Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for the City of York
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for the City of York December 2000 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are statutorily required to review periodically the electoral arrangements – such as the number of councillors representing electors in each area and the number and boundaries of wards and electoral divisions – of every principal local authority in England. In broad terms our objective is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, and the number of councillors and ward names. We can also make recommendations for change to the electoral arrangements of parish and town councils in the district. © Crown Copyright 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page SUMMARY v 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 5 3 REPRESENTATIONS RECEIVED 9 4 ANALYSIS AND DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 15 5 NEXT STEPS 39 APPENDICES A Draft Recommendations for the City of York: Detailed Mapping 41 B City of York Council’s Proposed Electoral Arrangements 45 C The Statutory Provisions 47 A large map illustrating the existing and proposed ward boundaries for York is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND SUMMARY The Commission began a review of the electoral arrangements for the City of York on 16 May 2000. • This report summarises the representations we received during the first stage of the review, and makes draft recommendations for change. We found that the existing electoral arrangements provide unequal representation of electors in the City of York: • in 15 of the 29 wards the number of electors represented by each councillor varies by more than 10 per cent from the average for the city, and three wards vary by more than 20 per cent from the average; • by 2005 this unequal representation is expected to continue, with the number of electors per councillor forecast to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average in 14 wards and by more than 20 per cent in four wards. Our main draft recommendations for future electoral arrangements (Figures 1 and 2 and paragraphs 144–145) are that: • City of York Council should have 47 councillors, six fewer than at present; • there should be 21 wards, instead of 29 as at present; • the boundaries of 25 of the existing wards should be modified, resulting in a net reduction of eight, and four wards should retain their existing boundaries; • elections should continue to take place every four years. These draft recommendations seek to ensure that the number of electors represented by each city councillor is as nearly as possible the same, having regard to local circumstances. • In 16 of the proposed 21 wards the number of electors per councillor would vary by no more than 10 per cent from the city average. • This improved level of electoral equality is expected to improve further, with the number of electors per councillor in 20 wards expected to vary by no more than 10 per cent from the average for the city in 2005. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND v Recommendations are also made for changes to town council electoral arrangements which provide for: • revised warding arrangements and the redistribution of councillors for Haxby Town Council. This report sets out our draft recommendations on which comments are invited. • We will consult on our draft recommendations for ten weeks from 12 December 2000. Because we take this consultation very seriously, we may move away from our draft recommendations in the light of Stage Three responses. It is therefore important that all interested parties let us have their views and evidence, whether or not they agree with our draft recommendations. • After considering local views, we will decide whether to modify our draft recommendations and then make our final recommendations to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions. • It will then be for the Secretary of State to accept, modify or reject our final recommendations. He will also determine when any changes come into effect. You should express your views by writing directly to the Commission at the address below by 19 February 2001: Review Manager City of York Review Local Government Commission for England Dolphyn Court 10/11 Great Turnstile London WC1V 7JU Fax: 020 7404 6142 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lgce.gov.uk vi LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Figure 1: The Commission’s Draft Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map councillors reference 1 Acomb 3 Acomb ward; Beckfield ward (part); Westfield Map 2 and ward (part) large map 2 Bishopthorpe 1 Copmanthorpe ward (part – the parishes of Map 2 Acaster Malbis and Bishopthorpe) 3 Clifton 3 Bootham ward; Clifton ward (part) Map 2 and large map 4 Dunnington 1 Dunnington & Kexby ward (the parishes of Map 2 Dunnington and Kexby); Strensall ward (part – the parish of Holtby) 5 Fulford 1 Unchanged (the parish of Fulford) Map 2 and large map 6 Guildhall 3 Clifton ward (part); Fishergate ward (part); Map 2 and Guildhall ward; Heworth ward (part); Walmgate large map ward (part) 7 Haxby & 3 Haxby ward (the parish of Haxby); Wigginton Maps 2 and Wigginton ward (the parish of Wigginton) A2 8 Heslington 1 Unchanged (the parish of Heslington) Map 2 and large map 9 Heworth 3 Heworth ward (part); Monk ward (part) Map 2 and large map 10 Heworth Without 1 Heworth Without ward (the parish of Heworth Map 2 and Without); Monk ward (part) large map 11 Holgate 3 Beckfield ward (part); Bishophill ward (part); Map 2 and Holgate ward large map 12 Huntington & New 3 Unchanged (the parishes of Huntington and New Map 2 Earswick Earswick) 13 Knavesmire 3 Bishophill ward (part); Knavesmire ward (part); Map 2 and Micklegate ward (part) large map 14 Micklegate 3 Micklegate ward (part); Foxwood ward (part); Map 2 and Westfield ward (part) large map 15 Osbaldwick 1 Osbaldwick ward (the parish of Osbaldwick); Map 2 and Strensall ward (part – the parish of Murton) large map 16 Rural West York 3 Upper Poppleton ward (the parishes of Askham Map 2 Bryan, Askham Richard, Hessay, Nether Poppleton, Rufforth and Upper Poppleton); Copmanthorpe ward (part – the parish of Copmanthorpe) LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND vii Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map councillors reference 17 Skelton, Rawcliffe 3 Clifton Without ward (the parish of Clifton Map 2 and & Clifton Without Without); Rawcliffe & Skelton ward (the parishes large map of Rawcliffe and Skelton) 18 Strensall 2 Strensall ward (part – the parishes of Earswick, Map 2 Stockton-on-the-Forest, Strensall and Towthorpe) 19 Walmgate 3 Fishergate ward (part); Walmgate ward (part) Map 2 and large map 20 Westfield 2 Foxwood ward (part); Micklegate ward (part); Map 2 and Westfield ward (part) large map 21 Wheldrake 1 Unchanged (the parishes of Deighton, Elvington, Map 2 Naburn and Wheldrake) Notes: 1 The city of York itself is the only unparished area. 2 Map 2 and Appendix A, including the large map in the back of the report, illustrate the proposed wards outlined above. 3 We have made a number of minor boundary amendments to ensure that existing ward boundaries adhere to ground detail. These changes do not affect any electors. viii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Figure 2: The Commission’s Draft Recommendations for the City of York Ward name Number Electorate Number Variance Electorate Number of Variance of (2000) of electors from (2005) electors from councillors per average per average councillor % councillor % 1 Acomb 3 9,532 3,177 4 9,737 3,246 -1 2 Bishopthorpe 1 3,158 3,158 3 3,265 3,265 0 3 Clifton 3 9,223 3,074 0 9,848 3,283 0 4 Dunnington 1 2,971 2,971 -3 3,059 3,059 -6 5 Fulford 1 2,197 2,197 -28 3,284 3,284 0 6 Guildhall 3 9,185 3,062 0 9,968 3,323 2 7 Haxby & 3 10,449 3,483 14 10,668 3,556 9 Wigginton 8 Heslington 1 3,448 3,448 13 3,538 3,538 8 9 Heworth 3 9,579 3,193 4 9,868 3,289 1 10 Heworth Without 1 3,165 3,165 3 3,206 3,206 -2 11 Holgate 3 8,839 2,946 -4 9,926 3,309 1 12 Huntington & New 3 9,615 3,205 5 10,044 3,348 2 Earswick 13 Knavesmire 3 9,385 3,128 2 9,977 3,326 2 14 Micklegate 3 9,118 3,039 -1 9,505 3,168 -3 15 Osbaldwick 1 2,586 2,586 -15 3,378 3,378 3 16 Rural West York 3 8,186 2,729 -11 8,700 2,900 -11 17 Skelton, Rawcliffe 3 8,947 2,982 -3 10,167 3,389 4 & Clifton Without 18 Strensall 2 5,568 2,784 -9 6,219 3,110 -5 19 Walmgate 3 9,351 3,117 2 9,773 3,258 0 20 Westfield 2 6,302 3,151 3 6,365 3,183 -3 21 Wheldrake 1 3,009 3,009 -2 3,254 3,254 -1 Totals 47 143,813 – – 153,749 – – Averages – – 3,060 – – 3,271 – Source: Electorate figures are based on the City of York Council’s submission.