Signature Redacted

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Signature Redacted The Ruins of Science I ~CHtVE8 Whatever Happened to the Tevatron? MASSACHU OF TECHNOLOGy by JUN 3 0 2014 Suzanne E. Jacobs LIBRARIES B.S. Physics The University of Michigan, 2011 SUBMITTED TO THE PROGRAM IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES/WRITING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN SCIENCE WRITING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2014 02014 Suzanne E. Jacobs. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature redacted Signature of Author: Program in Comparative Media Studies/Writing June 13, 2014 3i gnature redacted Certified by: Corby Kummer Senior Editor, The Atlantic Signature redacted Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Thomas Levenson Professor of Science Writing Director, Graduate Program in Science Writing ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I want to thank my parents, Cathy and Andy Jacobs. I'm here because of you. I couldn't have asked for better role models and friends. Your endless support and love keeps me going. I also want to thank my brother, Charlie, for always being just a phone call away. Chatting and joking around with you never failed to relax me when I was feeling stressed or overwhelmed. And of course, Brian Nord, my partner in crime and photographer. You were there for me from the moment I came up with my thesis topic to the final edits. Thank you. To my thesis advisor, Corby Kummer, thank you for your guidance. You kept me focused from day one, when I came to you with enough ideas to fill a book. I also want to thank Marcia Bartusiak and Seth Mnookin for giving me feedback on early drafts of my thesis and the rest of the science writing department - Tom Levenson, Alan Lightman, Phil Hilts and Shannon Larkin - for an unforgettable year. It was a whirlwind, but I learned a lot, wrote a lot and grew a lot as a journalist. Abi, Alix, Emma, Jenny, Julie, Lindsay and Sam, I was lucky to have every one of you by my side through it all. 3 4 The Ruins of Science Whatever Happened to the Tevatron? by Suzanne E. Jacobs Submitted to the Program in Comparative Media Studies/Writing On June 13, 2014 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Science Writing ABSTRACT The Tevatron was the world's highest energy particle accelerator for more than two decades. Built at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois in the early 1980s, the machine accelerated protons and antiprotons through its 4.26-mile ring of magnets and smashed them together in one of two 5,000 ton detectors that traced and measured the collision debris. Scientists then analyzed the results in search of new fundamental particles or a deeper understanding of existing ones, and in 1995, they discovered the top quark, one of only 17 known fundamental particles in the universe. The discovery made headlines around the world and became the Tevatron's crowning achievement. When the U.S. Department of Energy decided to shut the Tevatron down in 2011 after a more powerful collider began running in Europe, the old machine entered a kind of limbo. Its life in the world of experimental particle physics was over, but there were no plans for its remains. Using the Tevatron as a case study, this thesis asks the fundamental question: what can and should be done with the ruins that lie in the wake of progress? In doing so, it examines a difficult challenge facing today's science and technology museum curators, namely how to preserve the historical and scientific value of important artifacts amid the acceleration of scientific progress and the growing prevalence of big science. Thesis Supervisor: Corby Kummer Title: Senior Editor, The Atlantic 5 6 THE TEVATRON, LEGENDARY PARTICLE COLLIDER, SHUTS DOWN AT 28 October 1, 2011 The most powerful particle collider in the United States and the second most powerful particle collider in the world shut down yesterday. The Tevatron, located about 40 miles west of Chicago near Geneva, IL, was 28 years old. A 4.26-mile ring of more than 1,000 long, boxy magnets lined up end-to-end, the subterranean beast's full expanse was only visible from a bird's eye view. And even then, the nearly perfect circle of raised earth only hinted at the scientific marvel lying below the prairie fields of Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. Scientists built the Tevatron in the early This aerial view of Fermilab reveals the 4.26-mile ring of the 1980s to uncover the fundamental components Tevatron (Fermilab). of our universe. It smashed together protons In 1986 the Illinois Society of and antiprotons moving at nearly the speed of Professional Engineers named the entire light, creating tiny microcosms of Big Bang- machine one of the top 10 engineering like conditions. In one second, millions of achievements of the previous 100 years. these collisions would send showers of particle All in all, the Tevatron left a mark on debris flying through one of two three-story, history comparable to its mark on the Illinois 5000-ton detectors called the Collider Detector prairie. More than 1,000 physicists earned their at Fermilab (CDF) and DZero. PhDs working on the Tevatron, and the To control such energetic particles, the technological advances it spurred paved the Tevatron employed special magnets way for future accelerators. containing superconducting cables that, when The Tevatron's most notable discovery cooled to around negative 450 degrees came in 1995, when scientists announced that Fahrenheit, conducted electric current with amid collision debris, they found the last of a zero resistance, generating extraordinarily group of fundamental particles known as powerful magnetic fields. The demand for so quarks. Quarks are tiny building blocks that many of these cables gave rise to an entire bind together to form particles called hadrons, industry surrounding superconductors, and which include the protons and neutrons in the from that industry sprang MRI technology. nuclei of atoms. In the 1960s, theorists The cryogenic cooling system Fermilab predicted the existence of six types or "flavors" developed to maintain such cold temperatures of quarks that, for various reasons, became was named an International Historic known as up, down, strange, charm, top and Mechanical Engineering Landmark by the bottom quarks. By 1977, all but the top quark American Society of Mechanical Engineers in had graduated from theory to reality through 1993. direct observation. The top quark, it would turn out, was so heavy that only a machine as powerful as the Tevatron could create it. 7 In an interview with the Los Angeles Fermilab scientists would have to leave the Times a few days before the shut-down, Higgs search to the LHC. physicist Giovanni Punzi discussed the Hundreds of people who had worked importance of that discovery. with the Tevatron over the years flocked to "The top quark was crucial because Fermilab from all over this week to say their without it, all of our theories of how subatomic final goodbyes. particles behave wouldn't work," he said. The two detectors were turned off first. "Physicists knew there had to be a sixth quark. Ben Kilminster, one of the scientists who Everybody was puzzled by the fact that we worked on CDF, said a somber goodbye to the couldn't find it. The reason we couldn't find it 12-meter high behemoth. is because its mass was so large that scientists "For many of us, CDF is more than a could not produce it until the Tevatron came machine," Kilminster said. "It's a living along. It was a very long search. If we had not creature that has the superhuman ability to see found the top quark, understanding all of the the microscopic quantum world. So it's going rest of physics would have been a problem." to be with heavy hearts that many of us watch The Tevatron made a whole host of it close its eyes to this world that has captivated contributions to particle physics, and in its last us for so long." few years had turned its attention toward the After the detectors were turned off, Higgs boson, a particle that physicists have Helen Edwards, who was instrumental in been theorizing about for decades. Unsure how building the machine, had the honor of heavy the Higgs will be, Fermilab scientists, powering it down. She also had the burden of like explorers hunting for buried treasure, had ending an era in U.S. particle physics. been systematically testing different collision Over the next week, the Tevatron's energies, hoping to eventually pinpoint the magnets will slowly emerge from their deep right one that would yield the elusive particle. freeze. When they reach room temperature, Finding the Higgs would have solved the Fermilab scientists will remove the cooling biggest mystery in particle physics today and liquids and gases. certainly would have been a fitting sendoff to It's unclear what will happen to the what was the world's highest-energy collider Tevatron's remains. The monstrous corpse is for more than two decades. too big to ship off to a museum and would cost Instead, that search will continue at too much to dismantle. For curators and Europe's Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a 17- historians, this will be a kind of case study in mile ring that's more than twice as powerful as how to deal with the ever increasing size of the Tevatron.
Recommended publications
  • After Dinner Speech by Dr
    1 After Dinner Speech by Dr. Josef Rembser CERN, Geneva 14 September 2009 Celebration in honour of Professor Herwig Schopper’s 85 th Birthday I. Dear Friends, honourable, dear Professor Schopper! On 28 February of this year, you celebrated your 85th Birthday. This evening we are looking back on this memorable date, wishing you many happy returns of the day. You have been blessed with a life full of harmony and accomplishments, always keeping young physically and intellectually. This is a special blessing granted to a person: Love and family, friendships and encounters, giving and receiving, working and achieving acknowledgements and honours in a fulfilling profession and in challenging missions. Tomorrow, a scientific Colloquium will honour you as researcher and scientific teacher . Today, on the eve of the colloquium, I would like to speak about Herwig Schopper as a research politician and a research manager . My personal remarks and remembrances will focus, dear Herwig Schopper, on the guiding contributions you made in shaping, promoting and advancing science and research and their relevant policies in Germany and in Europe. 2 Professor Heuer, I am grateful for your invitation. It is a pleasure for me to give today's After-Dinner speech in honour of our jubilee. For many years during my service in the German Ministry of Research and Technology (BMFT) in Bonn I had close personal and professional connections with you, dear Professor Schopper, regarding German science and research policy including CERN. II. In 1945, with the end of the 2 nd World War, Germany as guilty party and loser plunged the world and its own country into destruction and suffering, thus experiencing a historical catastrophe.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter
    Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 Volume 5 • Number 1 worldscinet.com/appn Takaaki Kajita 2015 Physics Nobel Laureate published by Institute of Advanced Studies, Nanyang Technological University (IAS@NTU) and South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association (SEATPA) South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 • Volume 5 • Number 1 A publication of the IAS@NTU Singapore and SEATPA Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter publishes articles reporting frontier discoveries in EDITORIAL physics, research highlights, and news to facilitate interaction, collaboration and 3 cooperation among physicists in Asia Pacific physics community. PEOPLE Editor-in-Chief 4 “Observing the Distant Supernova” — Interview with Kok Khoo Phua Nobel Laureate Prof Brian Schmidt Associate Editor-in-Chief “Discovering the W and Z Bosons” — Interview with Swee Cheng Lim Nobel Laureate Prof Carlo Rubbia SEATPA Committee Christopher C Bernido Phil Chan Leong Chuan Kwek Choy Heng Lai Swee Cheng Lim Ren Bao Liu Hwee Boon Low Anh Ký Nguyên Choo Hiap Oh OPINION AND COMMENTARY Kok Khoo Phua 10 China’s Great Scientific Leap Forward: Completion of a Roh Suan Tung Preecha Yupapin planned ‘Great Collider’ would transform particle physics Hishamuddin Zainuddin Freddy Zen Editorial Team NEWS Sen Mu 12 CityU’s Institute for Advanced Study will Champion Bold New Han Sun Chi Xiong Research Initiatives Case made for 'Ninth Planet' Graphic Designers Chuan Ming Loo Erin Ong Cover Photo: "Takaaki Kajita 5171- 2015" by Bengt Nyman - Own work.
    [Show full text]
  • Polite Debate
    4 Nature Vol. 286 3 July 1980 High-energy physics Schopper, would be able to organize and prototype vitrification plant operating at draw on talent throughout CERN, for Windscale by 1990 if the go-ahead for the short and long periods, avoiding the career plant can be given some time this year. LEP leaps ahead problems and inflexibility that would come The decision for British Nuclear Fuels, THE European Centre for Nuclear with a new "LEP division". "We will which runs Windscale, will not be easy, Research (CERN) last week made a firm bring the work to the people", he said. however; it will have to choose between its proposal lo its 12 member states for a new The CERN Council has adopted a own HARVEST process and the French accelerator to be built in the 1980s. The "firm" budget for 1981 of 596 million equivalent (A VM) which has been machine, called LEP, is a 30 km circum­ Swiss francs (£156 million), but this operating commercially since 1978. ference ring for accelerating, storing and includes no provision for the construction Officials are keen to point out that a colliding very high energy beams of of LEP. Schopper will propose a running decision to opt for A VM would not mean electrons. The proposal already bears the budget which will include LEP in six the end of HAR VEST, which should be mark of CERN's firebrand director­ months' time: he expects it to be a little kept going to keep later options open. general-designate, German Professor larger than the 198 I budget "but we are The government plans to start producing Herwig Schopper: LEP is now cheaper only talking of a per cent or two".
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation from Big Science: Enhancing Big Science Impact Agenda
    INNOVATION FROM BIG SCIENCE: ENHANCING BIG SCIENCE IMPACT AGENDA Erkko Autio, Imperial College Business School MARCH 2014 Innovation from Big Science: Enhancing Big Science Impact Agenda Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................. 4 Aims of the Study ............................................................................................................... 4 Findings ............................................................................................................................. 4 Big-Science Impact Agenda: Recommendations .................................................................... 5 Summary for Innovation ....................................................................................................... 7 Economic Impact of Big Science .......................................................................................... 7 Management and Governance Issues .................................................................................. 8 Case Study Evidence .......................................................................................................... 9 Research Agenda Going Forward ........................................................................................ 9 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 11 Big-Science Context ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MAIN INJECTOR Photo by Reidar Hahn
    FN EE RW MS I FERMILAB AU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LABORATORY SPECIAL ISSUE MAIN INJECTOR Photo by Reidar Hahn Volume 22 INSIDE: Tuesday, June 1, 1999 2 It Takes a Laboratory Number 11 6 Building the Main Injector f 8 Main Injector 10 On Time, On Budget 12 The Rundown on the Main Injector 14 The Science of Run II It Takes a Laboratory… by Sharon Butler Rome wasnÕt built in a day, and neither was the Main Injector. It took seven long years of planning, designing, estimating, calculating, budgeting, digging, razing, connecting, guiding, and finetuning to pull together the $260-million machine that will usher in a new era of particle physics at Fermilab. Needless to say, no one person took the project from dream to finish. Raising the Main Injector was the work of an army of Laboratory personnel Ñmanagers and technicians, secretaries and physicists, truckers and engineers. Space does not begin to allow us to name them all. Here are just a few. CIVIL CONSTRUCTION One was Dixon Bogert, associate head of the Beams Division, who oversaw the civil constructionÑthe excavation of the ground, the laying of the tunnel floor, the placement of one concrete block after another to create the two-mile tunnel for the Main Injector, the digging of cooling ponds, the building of a Photo by Reidar Hahn new substation, the creation of new service Dixon Bogert buildings. Working with Bogert were not only the contractors who handled the demolition and construction work but Fermilab workers who got their hands very dirty. More than 100 workers, for example, emptied out the magnets, pipes, cables, trays, buses, stands and radiofrequency modules from what is known as the F0 area of the old Main Ring so that the 638-foot tunnel space could be reconfigured to allow room for the new beamline from the Main Injector.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charm of Theoretical Physics (1958– 1993)?
    Eur. Phys. J. H 42, 611{661 (2017) DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80040-9 THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL H Oral history interview The Charm of Theoretical Physics (1958{ 1993)? Luciano Maiani1 and Luisa Bonolis2,a 1 Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Piazzale A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy 2 Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany Received 10 July 2017 / Received in final form 7 August 2017 Published online 4 December 2017 c The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract. Personal recollections on theoretical particle physics in the years when the Standard Theory was formed. In the background, the remarkable development of Italian theoretical physics in the second part of the last century, with great personalities like Bruno Touschek, Raoul Gatto, Nicola Cabibbo and their schools. 1 Apprenticeship L. B. How did your interest in physics arise? You enrolled in the late 1950s, when the period of post-war reconstruction of physics in Europe was coming to an end, and Italy was entering into a phase of great expansion. Those were very exciting years. It was the beginning of the space era. L. M. The beginning of the space era certainly had a strong influence on many people, absolutely. The landing on the moon in 1969 was for sure unforgettable, but at that time I was already working in Physics and about to get married. My interest in physics started well before. The real beginning was around 1955. Most important for me was astronomy. It is not surprising that astronomy marked for many people the beginning of their interest in science.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minutes Were Approved
    The Regents of the University of California COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LABORATORIES November 20, 2014 The Committee on Oversight of the Department of Energy Laboratories met on the above date at UCSF–Mission Bay Conference Center, San Francisco. Members present: Regents Atkins, De La Peña, Kieffer, Newsom, Pattiz, Reiss, and Sherman; Ex officio members Napolitano and Varner; Advisory member Gilly In attendance: Regents Engelhorn, Island, Leong Clancy, Makarechian, Ortiz Oakley, Pérez, Ruiz, Saifuddin, and Torlakson, Regents-designate Davis, Gorman, and Oved, Faculty Representative Hare, Secretary and Chief of Staff Shaw, General Counsel Robinson, Chief Compliance and Audit Officer Vacca, Provost Dorr, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Brostrom, Senior Vice Presidents Dooley and Stobo, Vice Presidents Budil, Duckett, Lenz, and Sakaki, Chancellors Block, Blumenthal, Gillman, Hawgood, Katehi, Wilcox, and Yang, and Recording Secretary McCarthy The meeting convened at 11:15 a.m. with Committee Chair Pattiz presiding. He informed the Regents that Bret Knapp, recently Interim Director of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), former Principal Associate Director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, and longtime UC employee, passed away November 18. Mr. Knapp was an exceptional leader and a renowned national expert in stockpile stewardship; his loss will be felt deeply. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Upon motion duly made and seconded, the minutes of the meeting of September 18, 2014 were approved. 2. UPDATE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LABORATORIES AND PRESENTATION ON LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY: SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ON A MISSION [Background material was provided to Regents in advance of the meeting, and a copy is on file in the Office of the Secretary and Chief of Staff.] Committee Chair Pattiz stated that on October 21 United States Secretary of Energy Moniz visited the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL).
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribuição De Chien Shiung Wu Para a Teoria Quântica
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ENSINO, FILOSOFIA E HISTÓRIA DAS CIÊNCIAS ANGEVALDO MENEZES MAIA FILHO PARA UMA HISTÓRIA DAS MULHERES NA CIÊNCIA: A CONTRIBUIÇÃO DE CHIEN SHIUNG WU PARA A TEORIA QUÂNTICA Salvador 2018 ANGEVALDO MENEZES MAIA FILHO PARA UMA HISTÓRIA DAS MULHERES NA CIÊNCIA: A CONTRIBUIÇÃO DE CHIEN SHIUNG WU PARA A TEORIA QUÂNTICA Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ensino, Filosofia e História das Ciências, da Universidade Federal da Bahia e da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana como requisito parcial para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Ensino, Filosofia e História das Ciências. Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Indianara Lima Silva Salvador 2018 ANGEVALDO MENEZES MAIA FILHO PARA UMA HISTÓRIA DAS MULHERES NA CIÊNCIA: A CONTRIBUIÇÃO DE CHIEN SHIUNG WU PARA A TEORIA QUÂNTICA Dissertação apresentada como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de mestre em 19 de abril de 2018, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino, Filosofia e História das Ciências, da Universidade Federal da Bahia e da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. 19 de abril de 2018 Banca Examinadora _______________________________________________ Professora Doutora Indianara Lima Silva _______________________________________________ Professora Doutora Maria Margaret Lopes _______________________________________________ Professor Doutor Olival Freire Júnior AGRADECIMENTOS Como não poderia deixar de ser, os agradecimentos revelam o quão importante são as pessoas que nos cercam e o quanto pode ser difícil, no meu caso, absolutamente impossível, realizar um trabalho individualmente. Agradeço a Josenice Assunção Maia e Angevaldo Maia, pessoas que tive a sorte de ter enquanto genitores me apoiando incondicionalmente desde sempre, confiando e acreditando nas minhas escolhas, a maior e inesgotável fonte de amor que pude encontrar na vida.
    [Show full text]
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Panel Session
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory F-Conf-93/‘282 Panel Session- Part I In Flux-Science Policy and the Social Structure of Big Laboratories, 1964-1979 Catherine Westfall Michigan State University CEBAF, Newport News, Virigina Fermilab History Collaboration, P.O. Box 500, Batauia, Illinois 60510 Panel Session-Part II Some Sociological Consequences of High Energy Physicists’ Development of the Standard Model, 1964-1979 Mark Bodnarczuk National Renewable Energy Laboratory The University of Chicago Fermilab History Collaboration, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510 September 1993 To be published in the Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics: the Rise of the Standard Model, SLAC, June 1992 $ Operated by Universities Research Association Inc. under Contract No. DE-ACW76CH030W wih the United States Department of Energy Dwclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Gouernment. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof: The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • E4668-ISIDL.Pdf
    TFS-18445; No of Pages 11 Technological Forecasting & Social Change xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Technological Forecasting & Social Change Some remarks concerning the cost/benefit analysis applied to LHC at CERN Herwig Schopper CERN, Switzerland University of Hamburg, Germany article info abstract Article history: The cost/benefit analysis originally developed for infrastructures in the economic sector has recently been Received 16 September 2015 extended by Florio et al. to infrastructures of basic research. As a case study the large accelerator LHC at CERN Received in revised form 19 January 2016 and its experiments have been selected since as a paradigmatic example of frontier research they offer an excel- Accepted 5 February 2016 lent case to test the CBA model. It will be shown that in spite of this improved method the LHC poses serious dif- Available online xxxx ficulties for such an analysis. Some principle difficulties are due to the special character of scientific projects. Their fi Keywords: main result is the production of new basic scienti c knowledge whose net social value cannot be easily expressed Scientific research infrastructures in monetary terms. Other problems are related to the very strong integration of LHC into the general activities of Cost–benefit analysis CERN providing however, interesting observations concerning a new management style for global projects. Final- CERN ly the mission of CERN (including LHC) is unique since it was founded with two tasks—promote science and bring LHC nations together. No way has yet been developed to assess in economic terms success for the second objective.
    [Show full text]
  • How Little Science Became Big Science in the U.S.A. E
    HOW LITTLE SCIENCE BECAME BIG SCIENCE IN THE U.S.A. E. Goldwasser To cite this version: E. Goldwasser. HOW LITTLE SCIENCE BECAME BIG SCIENCE IN THE U.S.A.. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1982, 43 (C8), pp.C8-345-C8-355. 10.1051/jphyscol:1982823. jpa-00222383 HAL Id: jpa-00222383 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00222383 Submitted on 1 Jan 1982 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE CoZZoque C8, suppZe'ment au no 12, Tome 43, de'cenzbre 1982 page C8-345 HOW LITTLE SCIENCE BECAME BIG SCIENCE IN THE UnSnAn E.L. Goldwasser University of IZZinois, 107 CobZe Road, 801 South Wright Street, Champaign, IL 61820, 1I.S.A. How did little science become big science in the U.S.A. during the past half century? That question is really only one of a perplexing set of related questions which are of concern to most of us. Others are: Can science, as we have known it, survive the evolution from "little" to "big"? Has the character of science been changed? If it has, has it changed for the better or for the worse? And what has happened and what will happen to the creative scientist in the world of large and expensibe facilities, equipment, research, and research groups? These are all questions with which many of us have been concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan/Feb 2015
    I NTERNATIONAL J OURNAL OF H IGH -E NERGY P HYSICS CERNCOURIER WELCOME V OLUME 5 5 N UMBER 1 J ANUARY /F EBRUARY 2 0 1 5 CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the January/February 2015 issue of CERN Courier. CMS and the The coming year at CERN will see the restart of the LHC for Run 2. As the meticulous preparations for running the machine at a new high energy near their end on all fronts, the LHC experiment collaborations continue LHC Run 1 legacy to glean as much new knowledge as possible from the Run 1 data. Other labs are also working towards a bright future, for example at TRIUMF in Canada, where a new flagship facility for research with rare isotopes is taking shape. To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://cerncourier.com/cws/sign-up. To subscribe to the magazine, the e-mail new-issue alert, please visit: http://cerncourier.com/cws/how-to-subscribe. TRIUMF TRIBUTE CERN & Canada’s new Emilio Picasso and research facility his enthusiasm SOCIETY EDITOR: CHRISTINE SUTTON, CERN for rare isotopes for physics The thinking behind DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY JESSE KARJALAINEN/IOP PUBLISHING, UK p26 p19 a new foundation p50 CERNCOURIER www. V OLUME 5 5 N UMBER 1 J AARYN U /F EBRUARY 2 0 1 5 CERN Courier January/February 2015 Contents 4 COMPLETE SOLUTIONS Covering current developments in high-energy Which do you want to engage? physics and related fi elds worldwide CERN Courier is distributed to member-state governments, institutes and laboratories affi liated with CERN, and to their personnel.
    [Show full text]