LOCAL STREETS and ROADS WORKING GROUP Meeting Agenda – December 3, 2009 Page 2 of 2

LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS WORKING GROUP 101 - 8th St., 1st Floor, Room 171 Thursday, December 3, 2009 8:30 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. - SPIR 9:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. - LSRWG

AGENDA Estimated Topic Time

1. Introductions (Fernando Cisneros, Chair) 5 min

2. Review of November 5, 2009 Minutes* (Fernando Cisneros, Chair) 5 min

3. Programming Updates: A. Report of Federal Inactive Obligations – September 2009 Quarterly Review* (Marcella Aranda) 5 min B. Local Safety Programs Delivery Update* (Marcella Aranda) 5 min

4. Standing Updates: A. Legislative Update (Rebecca Long) 5 min B. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Update 30 min 1. ARRA LA-ODIS Reporting and Delivery Update (Monthly/Weekly)* (Craig Goldblatt) 2. ARRA Cost Savings Update (Craig Goldblatt) 3. LAO Report - Using Federal Economic Stimulus Funds for Transportation* (Theresa Romell) 4. ARRA Considerations (Jean Mazur, FHWA) 30 min

5. Discussion Items: A. New Federal Act – 30 min 1. Updated Staff Proposal* (Craig Goldblatt) 2. LSRWG Proposal* (Fernando Cisneros) 3. Funds Distribution Policy (Craig Goldblatt) B. Draft 2008/2009 Regional Pavement Condition Report** (Sui Tan) C. Draft Local Streets and Roads Shortfall Projections* (Theresa Romell) 15 min D. P-TAP Round 11 Conditional Grant Awards List** (Amy Burch) 10 min

6. Informational Items: A. TIP Update* (Sri Srinivasan) 5 min (The current TIP and subsequent TIP Amendments are available online at: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/tip) B. 2011 TIP Development (Sri Srinivasan) 10 min 1. Data Cleanup C. Strategic Plan Implementation Subcommittee Report (Theresa Romell) 10 min D. 2010 Summer High School Internship Program* (Memo Only) (MTC will be sponsoring its High School Internship Program for 2010. Agencies willing to participate in this educational program may download the Intern Request Form at http://www.mtc.ca.gov/jobs/high school and email it to Ann Macaulay at [email protected] by Thursday, December 10, 2009.) E. CY 2010 - January - June Tentative LSRWG Meeting Schedule* (Memo Only) F. PMP Certification Status* (Memo Only) (Current PMP Certification status is available online at: http://www.mtcpms.org/ptap/cert.html)

7. Caltrans Items: A. Caltrans Division of Local Assistance Web Update Announcements (DLAWUA)* (Memo Only) (Caltrans Division of Local Assistance has posted program updates/announcements to their website. Jurisdictions are encouraged to review the bulletins for program changes.)

Chair: Fernando Cisneros, City and County of San Francisco MTC Staff Liaison: Theresa Romell Vice-Chair: Seana Gause, Sonoma County Transportation Authority J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Agendas\10_Dec 03 09 LS&RWG Agenda.doc (20) 12.01.09LSRWG 120309 - Page 1 of 118 LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS WORKING GROUP Meeting Agenda – December 3, 2009 Page 2 of 2

i. [DLAWUA] Announcement: New COIN #4--Do Not Use Local Hiring Preferences* (Memo Only) ii. [DLAWUA] Announcement: FHWA/Caltrans Local Oversight Action PlanFFY2009 (LOAP)* (Memo Only)

8. Recommended Agenda Items for Next Meeting: (All) 5 min

Proposed Next Meeting: Thursday, January 7, 2009 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. MetroCenter, 3rd Floor, Fishbowl 101-8th Street, Oakland 94607 * = Attachment in Packet ** = Handouts Available at Meeting Contact MTC staff liaison, Theresa Romell, at 510.817.5772 if you have questions regarding this agenda.

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Agendas\10_Dec 03 09 LS&RWG Agenda.doc (20) LSRWG 12030912.01.09 - Page 2 of 118 LOCAL STREETS & ROADS WORKING GROUP MINUTES November 5, 2009 Page 1 of 3

1. Introductions Fernando Cisneros (City/County of San Francisco and Chair) requested introductions.

2. Minutes of October 2, 2009 LS&R Working Group Meeting The minutes of the October 2, 2009 LS&R Working Group meeting were accepted.

3. Programming Updates a. Local Safety Programs Delivery Update Marcella Aranda (MTC) reported that Caltrans has recently requested the RTPAs to assist them in improving the delivery rate for various Caltrans-administered federal local programs including the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), High Risk Rural Roads Program (HR3), Safe Routes to School (SR2S) and Local Highway Bridge Program (HBP). Therefore, moving forward, the region will be tracking the obligations of these projects on a regular basis to improve upon our own regional delivery, currently 34% for HSIP and 17% for HR3. Suggestions for elevating delivery performance for these programs is to require jurisdictions requesting STP/CMAQ funds to provide an explanation of any delivery issues for these safety programs. Other suggestions included applying STP/CMAQ delivery policies to the other federal local programs within the region. The Group agreed that staff should work with the CMAs to determine any common delivery issues before deciding on which approach to take to improve delivery. Staff will send out a request for information to the CMAs to determine any delivery issues. Feedback will be discussed at a future meeting. b. Report of Federal Inactive Obligations Marcella Aranda (MTC) reported that the September 2009 Inactive List was released on October 23, 2009 and noted that the December 2009 Look Ahead report was also included in the packet. Projects on the September list must submit an invoice or justification and appropriate documentation by November 25, 2009. Projects that do not meet these deadlines will be deobligated by FHWA. The projects on the December Look Ahead Report will be considered inactive if a valid FMIS transaction (meaning FHWA reimburses Caltrans) has not occurred by December 31.The December 2009 Inactive List is expected to be released by the end of January, and will be distributed via email to the Working Group shortly thereafter. MTC staff encourages all CMAs to contact their local agencies to make sure that all inactive obligation justifications and deobligation requests have been submitted to the Caltrans’ District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) as well as complete justification forms with backup documentation for projects that do not have eligible expenditures. Invoice status can be checked online via LPAMS, http://lpams.dot.ca.gov. Sponsors were reminded of the new invoicing procedures that became effective October 1, 2009 (September 1 was the soft effective date). All invoices must now be submitted directly to Caltrans Local Assistance, instead of directly to Accounting. The Quarterly Review of Inactive Obligations report is online at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/InactiveProjects.htm.

4. Standing Updates a. Legislative Update Rebecca Long (MTC) provided a legislative update, reporting that a one-month extension of SAFETEA-LU has been approved and a longer extension is likely to be proposed. The CTA and the League have joined together to form the group Californians to Protect Local Taxpayers which is advocating to protect the gas tax subvention funding from future raids, prevents deferment of such funds, and protects all taxes for local government or voter-approved taxes. Regarding the repayment of STA funds, the CTA is discussing repayment with the DOF; the CTA is to write out a proposed order for repayment for the court’s approval. The General Obligation Bond sale didn’t bring in as much revenue as expected; a mid-year budget revision is anticipated. Rebecca reported that SB 83 (Hancock) authorizes the CMAs to put a $10 VRF on the ballot for various transportation-related improvements, providing potentially approximately $60M in new revenues for the region. b. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Minutes\09_Nov 05 09 LS&R minutes.doc LSRWG 120309 - Page 3 of 118 LOCAL STREETS & ROADS WORKING GROUP MINUTES November 5, 2009 Page 2 of 3

Craig Goldblatt (MTC) summarized the monthly delivery monitoring and reminded sponsors that the deadline to obligate State ARRA funds is November 30, 2009. Staff emailed detailed instructions to the CMAs instructing them on how to proceed with redistribution of cost savings at time of award. When dealing with projects with cost savings at time of close-out, staff recommends applying those savings to existing federalized projects should time allow. Group members expressed concerns over the State’s policy of automatically deobligating any savings, thus hindering any opportunity to reobligate those funds. Staff reported that Caltrans HQ is required to deobligate any savings within 60 days of award and/or are over $250,000; therefore, the CMAs must find projects that can use the funds by December 31, 2009. In addition, all sponsors must submit their E-76 package by December 15, 2009 in order to avoid redistribution of funds. Redistributed funds are likely to be applied to ready-to-go projects. Sponsors were advised to notify Sylvia Fung at Local Assistance as soon as savings are realized. Caltrans has requested that sponsors report data accurately and/or in a timely basis and is requesting award information from each jurisdiction along with target dates. Data should be submitted to Bakari Akil at [email protected].

5. Discussion Items a. New Federal Act Craig Goldblatt (MTC) summarized the most current staff proposal for Cycle 1 of the New Federal Act. The STP- CMAQ payback was reduced, freeing up an additional $14M in new capacity which is proposed to be applied to the Climate Initiative Programs. The Group concurred with the currently Cycle 1 staff proposal and will advocate for a proportional share of anticipated funds as outlined in T2035. The Group discussed outreach and advocacy methods for local streets and roads. Suggestions included: 1) obtaining clarification on what is defined as unanticipated and anticipated funds as outlined in T2035; 2) using visual advocacy (technology); 3) public outreach; 4) gaining the support of MTC’s advocacy committees. b. Proposed Funds Distribution Policy for STP-CMAQ Programs Craig Goldblatt (MTC) reported that the Commission directed MTC to enhance Priority Development Areas (PDA) across all eligible programs, resulting in a proposed funds distribution policy utilizing the existing distribution policy. The Plan is due March 1, 2010. Craig summarized the proposed formula methodology to enhance PDAs and funds distribution. It is proposed that counties under 1M meet a minimum project threshold of $250,000, and counties over 1M, meet a minimum threshold of $500,000. The plan will include a Complete Streets Policy. c. Local Streets and Roads Working Group Proposed 2010 Meeting Schedule Staff put forth a motion to reschedule the January through June 2010 LSRWG meeting dates to the 1st Thursday in lieu of the 1st Friday of the month to accommodate those impacted by the Friday furloughs. The Group agreed. The meeting schedule for the July through December meetings will be revisited in June to determine if the meetings will continue to be held on the 1st Thursday or revert back to the 1st Friday schedule.

6. Informational Items a. TIP Update Sri Srinivasan (MTC) reminded the Group that MTC will be resuming its original TIP revision schedule of one revision per month provided a current status update for pending TIP modifications and/or amendments. b. 2011 TIP Development Sri Srinivasan (MTC) stated that in preparation for the 2011 TIP Development, sponsors are requested to review all their projects currently in the TIP and archive old projects accordingly. The deadline to review and archive projects is November 30, 2009. c. Strategic Plan Implementation Reform (SPIR) Subcommittee Update Theresa Romell (MTC) provided an update on the SPIR Subcommittee meeting, which included a detailed discussion about elevating delivery of the local safety programs. Jason Nutt (City of Santa Rosa) provided a brief overview of a new safety reporting tool being developed by a UC Berkeley professor. The group would like to host a presentation on

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Minutes\09_Nov 05 09 LS&R minutes.doc LSRWG 120309 - Page 4 of 118 LOCAL STREETS & ROADS WORKING GROUP MINUTES November 5, 2009 Page 3 of 3

this new tool, possibly in February. The next SPIR meeting is scheduled for December 3 prior to the LSRWG meeting. d. PMP Certification Status P-TAP Round 10 recipients were reminded that the deadline to submit certifications was September 30, 2009; jurisdictions who have failed to submit their certification by this deadline should review to see if their certification has expired. Those jurisdictions eligible for the one-year extension should formally request one as soon as possible to avoid any lapse in certification. PMP certification status is available online at www.mtcpms.org/ptap/cert.html.

7. Recommended Agenda Items for Next Meeting ¾ New Authorization

Proposed Next Meeting: Thursday, December 3, 2009 8:30 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. - SPIR 9:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. – LSRWG MetroCenter, 1st Floor, Room 171 101-8th Street, Oakland 94607

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Minutes\09_Nov 05 09 LS&R minutes.doc LSRWG 120309 - Page 5 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A

TO: Local Streets and Roads Working Group DATE: December 3, 2009

FR: Marcella Aranda

RE: Federal Inactive Obligations List – September 2009 List and December 2009 Look Ahead

Federal regulations require that agencies receiving federal funds invoice against their obligations at least once every six months. Projects that do not have invoicing activity over a six-month period are placed on the Inactive Obligation list, and those projects are at risk of deobligation of federal funds if Caltrans and the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) do not receive either an invoice or a valid justification for inactivity. A final list of projects to be deobligated as a result of the June 10, 2009 quarterly review meeting is available online at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/Inactiveprojects.htm. Previous memos included additional information on how to justify project delays to Caltrans and FHWA, as well as how to check the status of your invoice (via LPAMS, http://lpams.dot.ca.gov). Caltrans Local Assistance posts the quarterly inactive list, as well as future at-risk look-ahead reports online at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/Inactiveprojects.htm. The September 2009 Inactive List was released on October 23, 2009 and most recently updated on November 19, 2009; projects on the September list should have submitted an invoice or justification and appropriate documentation by November 25, 2009. FHWA is required to deobligate federal funds if they do not receive an invoice or justification within the prescribed timeframe. The December 2009 Inactive List is expected to be released by the end of January, and will be distributed via email to the Working Group shortly thereafter. Also attached for review is the Look Ahead report for December 2009. The Inactive Projects list is created from projects that meet the criteria on the first day of the quarter. The projects on the December Look Ahead Report will be considered inactive if a valid FMIS transaction (meaning FHWA reimburses Caltrans) has not occurred by December 31. Please ensure that your jurisdictions’ projects do not end up on this list. New procedures were implemented associated with the review and approval of local agency invoices for federal and state funded local transportation projects administered by Caltrans that went into effect September 1, 2009. Effective September 1, 2009, all invoice packages for Caltrans - District 4 are to be submitted to the attn. of Mr. Bakari Akil @ Caltrans - Office of Local Assistance, Mail Station 10-B, P.O. Box 23660, Oakland, CA 94623 - 0660.

If you have any questions regarding inactive obligations and invoicing, please contact MTC or Caltrans Local Assistance staff.

Attachments: i. Email from Sylvia Fung re: New Procedure-Invoice Package Submittals, September 9, 2009 ii. Letter from Denix Anbiah re: September 2009 Inactive Obligation Listing, October 23, 2009 iii. Bay Area Region Inactive Project Listing for September 2009, revised November 19, 2009 iv. Bay Area Region Inactive Project Listing Look Ahead for December 2009, October 29, 2009

LSRWG 120309 - Page 6 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A

----- Forwarded by Sylvia Fung/D04/Caltrans/CAGov on 09/09/2009 04:08 PM -----Bakari Akil/D04/Caltrans /CAGov To Local Assistance - Public Works Directors 09/09/2009 03:48 PM

Subject New Procedure - Invoice Package Submittals

Dear Directors,

As you may be aware of, new procedures were implemented associated with the review and approval of local agency invoices for federal and state funded local transportation projects administered by Caltrans that went into effect September 1, 2009.

The purpose of this communication is to establish the procedure for handling the review and approval of invoices with Caltrans District 4.

There have been no changes to the existing requirements arising from the new procedures for the submittal of your invoices. Please refer to DLA- OB 09-05 (Local Agency Invoice Review) @ http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/DLA_OB/DLA_OB.htm for details. Caltrans expects the following procedure to be adhered to by local agencies when submitting invoice packages:

¾ Effective September 1, 2009, all invoice packages for Caltrans - District 4 are to be submitted to the attn. of Mr. Bakari Akil @ Caltrans - Office of Local Assistance, Mail Station 10-B, P.O. Box 23660, Oakland, CA 94623 - 0660. ¾ Perform work and/or make progress estimates and payments to contractors/consultant. ¾ Prepare timely and accurate progress invoices (ensuring support documentation and a certification affirming the accuracy of the invoice package is included). ¾ Submit an original signed invoice on agency letterhead with 2 copies of the original invoice and 2 copies of your supporting documentation. ¾ Submit a copy of Exhibit 15-G2 "Local Agency Bidder DBE Information" (Construction Contracts) within 15 days of contract execution. Failure to submit this may result in deobligation of funds for your project. ¾ Submit a copy of the contract Award Package to DLAE within 60 days of contract award. Failure to submit the Award Package will delay the payment of the first construction invoice. (Please note that invoices that are received prior to or without the submission of an Award Package will be returned). ¾ Submit a contract Bid Summary/Cost to Date form to verify that the completed work is consistent with the total Federal/State funds invoiced. ¾ For consultant service contracts, submit a copy of the executed agreement and substantiation of the consultant selection process being in compliance with the requirements stipulated in Chapter 10 "Consultant Selection" of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual along with the first invoice. ¾ Submit an invoice a minimum of every 6 months to avoid placement on inactive projects list.

Feel free to contact me should you have additional questions or concerns.

Bakari Akil Office of Local Assistance 510 622-5912 510 286-5240 Fax [email protected]

LSRWG 120309 - Page 7 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A

LSRWG 120309 - Page 8 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A

LSRWG 120309 - Page 9 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A

LSRWG 120309 - Page 10 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A Inactive List for September 2009 Quarterly Review (Review Period 07/01/09 - 09/30/09) Local and State Administered and Locally Funded Projects

Project No + Prefix County Responsible Description Auth Date Expenditure Last Action Total Proj Cost Federal Funds Expended Unexpended First Qtrly LPAMS Action FMIS Action: Documentation Agency Action Required Prog Code Agency Date Date Funds Review I=Invoiced F= C= Closed D=De- Received (as of 11/19/09) Appearanc In Final Voucher Obligated I=Progress Invoice e (yyyy- Process R= E=FMIS Error D=De-obligation mm) Rejected Invoice I=Invoiced J=Justification A = Approved W=Withdrawn N/A=Docs. not Invoice (as of 11/19/09) reqd. (as of 11/19/09) X=Docs. Needed (as of 11/19/09)

OAKLAND ESTUARY (FRUITVALE No documentation AV) BR NO 33C-0147, SEISMIC received;submit copy of invoice 593302833D0 SEISMIC Ala Alameda County RETROFIT 9/1/1996 7/11/2006 7/11/2006 $25,000 $22,132 $16,841 $5,291 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE STATE COMMENTS), SEISMIC Invoice rejected;correct and 593303033D0 STPLZ Ala Alameda County RETROFIT 9/1/1996 7/7/2006 7/7/2006 $50,000 $44,265 $15,665 $28,600 2009-09 R N/A X return to LPA by 11/25/09. VASCO RD BETWEEN LIVERMORE AND CC COUNTY Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting LINE , ROADWAY ALIGNMENT approval; monitor for FMIS 5933074H240 STPL Ala Alameda County AND ROW . 5/12/2005 2/22/2008 6/20/2008 $5,400,000 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 $0 2009-03 I N/A N/A transaction. VASCO RD BETWEEN LIVERMORE AND CC COUNTY Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting LINE , ROADWAY ALIGNMENT approval; monitor for FMIS 5933074HY10 STPL Ala Alameda County AND ROW . 5/12/2005 2/22/2008 6/20/2008 $286,382 $136,876 $0 $136,876 2009-03 I N/A N/A transaction. VASCO RD BETWEEN LIVERMORE AND CC COUNTY Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting LINE , ROADWAY ALIGNMENT approval; monitor for FMIS 5933074L240 STPL Ala Alameda County AND ROW . 5/12/2005 2/22/2008 6/20/2008 $19,562,764 $9,350,000 $0 $9,350,000 2009-03 I N/A N/A transaction. VASCO RD BETWEEN LIVERMORE AND CC COUNTY Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting LINE , ROADWAY ALIGNMENT approval; monitor for FMIS 5933074LY10 STPL Ala Alameda County AND ROW . 5/12/2005 2/22/2008 6/20/2008 $1,190,926 $433,202 $0 $433,202 2009-03 I N/A N/A transaction.

AT VARIOUS SPOT No documentation INTERSECTIONS, TRAFFIC received;submit copy of invoice 5322025Q400 CML Ala Fremont SIGNAL CONTROLLERS 7/1/2001 1/3/2006 1/3/2006 $720,000 $312,000 $282,779 $29,221 2009-03 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. DOWNTOWN LIVERMORE PEDESTRIAN TRANSIT CENTER , Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting LANDSCAPED PED. WALKWAY/ approval; monitor for FMIS 5053016L400 CMAQ Ala Livermore PATH 11/9/2007 9/4/2008 3/30/2009 $1,161,539 $1,028,309 $16,340 $1,011,969 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. Metropolitan Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting Transportation BAY AREA , CMA PLANNING approval; monitor for FMIS 6084101H230 RSTP Ala Commission ACTIVITIES FY 04/05 . 8/12/2004 7/3/2007 7/3/2007 $3,656,390 $3,237,000 $3,118,020 $118,980 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. Metropolitan Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting Transportation BAY AREA, CMA PLANNING approval; monitor for FMIS 6084101Q230 RSTP Ala Commission ACTIVITIES FY 04/05 . 8/12/2004 7/3/2007 7/3/2007 $946,573 $838,000 $806,980 $31,020 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction.

I-580 FROM I-238 TO GREENVILLE No documentation R. DBLN,PLE,LI , UPRADE received;submit copy of invoice 5101013Q240 CML Ala Pleasanton INTEGRATION OF FWY & LOCAL 3/26/2000 6/19/2006 6/19/2006 $2,912,288 $2,167,818 $2,159,636 $8,182 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

I-580 FROM I-238 TO GREENVILLE No documentation R. DBLN,PLE,LI , UPRADE received;submit copy of invoice 5101013Q400 CML Ala Pleasanton INTEGRATION OF FWY & LOCAL 3/26/2000 6/19/2006 6/19/2006 $1,201,620 $1,055,182 $1,024,285 $30,897 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. In Final Voucher process; E. 14TH ST. , MEDIAN awaiting decision if more docs 5041022Q920 HP21L Ala San Leandro IMPROVEMENT & LIGHTING 9/12/2002 5/25/2006 5/25/2006 $100,000 $80,000 $80,000 $0 2009-06 F N/A N/A req'd; monitor progress.

No documentation E. 14TH ST. , MEDIAN received;submit copy of invoice 5041029Q920 HP21L Ala San Leandro IMPROVEMENT & LIGHTING 11/27/2007 11/29/2007 11/29/2007 $858,615 $623,629 $0 $623,629 2008-12 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

Data as of: 11/19/09 Page 1 of 5 LSRWGDate 120309 Printed: -11/30/2009 Page 11 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A Inactive List for September 2009 Quarterly Review (Review Period 07/01/09 - 09/30/09) Local and State Administered and Locally Funded Projects

SR4; BAILEY TO SR4/160 I/C & ADJ. ARTERIALS , SR4 CORRIDOR SIGNAL Confirmed FMIS Deobligation 5038011Q240 CML CC Antioch INTERCONNECT 9/5/2000 4/26/2007 4/26/2007 $285,781 $253,002 $167,429 $85,573 2009-06 I D N/A 10/09/09. SR4; BAILEY TO SR4/160 I/C & ADJ. ARTERIALS , SR4 CORRIDOR SIGNAL Confirmed FMIS Deobligation 5038011Q400 CML CC Antioch INTERCONNECT 9/5/2000 4/26/2007 4/26/2007 $956,737 $846,998 $692,906 $154,092 2009-06 I D N/A 10/109/09. 04-CC-242-R1.2/2.4, CITY OF Justification form submitted and CONCORD, CONCORD , AVE TO reviewed; will present to FHWA 513500333C0 STPLN CC Concord GRANT, MOD. I/C, ADD AUX. LN 3/1/1994 10/16/2006 10/16/2006 $8,034,920 $6,000,000 $5,899,828 $100,172 2008-12 N/A N/A J at quarterly meeting.

No documentation Contra Costa DELTA ROAD BRIDGE @ ROCK received;submit copy of invoice 59280321170 HBRR CC County SLOUGH, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 9/1/1997 9/26/2006 9/26/2006 $746,000 $596,800 $575,782 $21,018 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

No documentation Contra Costa DELTA ROAD BRIDGE @ ROCK received;submit copy of invoice 5928032Q110 HBRR CC County SLOUGH, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 9/1/1997 9/26/2006 9/26/2006 $204,000 $163,200 $162,902 $298 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

SAN PABLO AVE SYCAMORE No documentation AVE, WILLOW AVE , AC OVERLAY received;submit copy of invoice 5117007L230 STPL CC Hercules REHAB 8/23/2006 8/28/2007 8/28/2007 $677,737 $600,000 $543,646 $56,354 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. MARTINEZ MARINA; FOOT OF NORTH COURT STREET. , No documentation CONSTRUCT PASSENGER received;submit copy of invoice 50240093270 FBD CC Martinez SHELTER. 8/1/1996 4/5/2007 4/5/2007 $309,613 $247,690 $19,000 $228,690 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

BR @ GREEN ST (28C-0370) & No documentation WARD ST (28C-0406), BRIDGE received;submit copy of invoice 5024016Q240 STPLX CC Martinez RAIL REPLACEMENT 12/1/2000 7/28/2006 7/28/2006 $17,000 $15,050 $2,145 $12,905 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. WESTSIDE OF RICHMOND BART/AMTRAK STATION, No documentation CONSTRUCT NEW PEDESTRIAN received;submit copy of invoice 5137021Q400 CML CC Richmond PLAZA 3/1/2000 12/9/2005 4/29/2009 $730,000 $646,269 $646,269 $0 2007-12 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. FILBERT ST. FROM CHESLEY AVE. TO VERNON AVE. , No documentation SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY received;submit copy of invoice 5137026H230 STPLER CC Richmond IMPROVEMENT 4/18/2003 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 $353,081 $275,000 $242,821 $32,179 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. FILBERT ST. FROM CHESLEY AVE. TO VERNON AVE. , No documentation SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY received;submit copy of invoice 5137026H400 STPLER CC Richmond IMPROVEMENT 4/18/2003 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 $1,879,620 $1,431,000 $1,231,960 $199,040 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. FILBERT ST. FROM CHESLEY AVE. TO VERNON AVE. , No documentation SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY received;submit copy of invoice 5137026Q220 STPLER CC Richmond IMPROVEMENT 4/18/2003 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 $332,091 $294,000 $155,801 $138,199 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. RICHMOND BART ST MACDONALD AVE AND 16TH ST. , Copy of invoice rec'd by Agency; IMPROVEMENT BUS SHELTER & will provide to FHWA at quarterly 5137032H230 STPL CC Richmond PARKING 12/14/2004 5/13/2008 5/13/2008 $977,636 $865,500 $8,853 $856,647 2009-06 N/A N/A I meeting.

Data as of: 11/19/09 Page 2 of 5 LSRWGDate 120309 Printed: -11/30/2009 Page 12 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A Inactive List for September 2009 Quarterly Review (Review Period 07/01/09 - 09/30/09) Local and State Administered and Locally Funded Projects

SFD BLVD., MARIN & OAK TREE LANE , INSTALL LIGHTING, 5277018H210 STPLH Mrn Fairfax BEACONS SIGNINGS 6/27/2007 7/9/2007 7/9/2007 $120,175 $108,157 $0 $108,157 2009-06 A I N/A Confirm FMIS Invoice 10/27/09. IN NAPA & SOLANO CNTYS SR12 BET SR29 & I-80 , REHAB & No documentation EXPAND FR TWO TO FOUR received;submit copy of invoice 6204065HY10 HPLUL Nap Caltrans LANES 3/18/2008 5/28/2008 9/23/2009 $1,368,756 $1,095,005 $0 $1,095,005 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. IN NAPA & SOLANO CNTYS SR12 BET SR29 & I-80 , REHAB & No documentation EXPAND FR TWO TO FOUR received;submit copy of invoice 6204065L230 HPLUL Nap Caltrans LANES 3/18/2008 5/28/2008 9/23/2009 $9,281,385 $2,500,000 $1,400,000 $1,100,000 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. IN NAPA & SOLANO CNTYS SR12 BET SR29 & I-80 , REHAB & No documentation EXPAND FR TWO TO FOUR received;submit copy of invoice 6204065LY10 HPLUL Nap Caltrans LANES 3/18/2008 5/28/2008 9/23/2009 $12,550,342 $4,664,355 $0 $4,664,355 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

FIRST ST BRIDGE @ NAPA CRK No documentation (BR # 21C-0096) , BRIDGE received;submit copy of invoice 5042012H100 BRLO Nap Napa REPLACEMENT 7/30/1996 6/11/2007 9/18/2007 $784,514 $627,611 $604,233 $23,378 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

FIRST ST BRIDGE @ NAPA CRK No documentation (BR # 21C-0096) , BRIDGE received;submit copy of invoice 5042012L1C0 BRLO Nap Napa REPLACEMENT 7/30/1996 6/11/2007 9/18/2007 $186,325 $149,060 $0 $149,060 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

FIRST ST BRIDGE @ NAPA CRK No documentation (BR # 21C-0096) , BRIDGE received;submit copy of invoice 5042012Q100 BRLO Nap Napa REPLACEMENT 7/30/1996 6/11/2007 9/18/2007 $8,943,932 $7,095,146 $7,074,588 $20,558 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. MONTEREY RD. AND CENTRAL AVE.INTERSECTION , PED In Final Voucher process; SAFETY IMRPOVE, RADAR awaiting decision if more docs 5152014Q210 STPLHSR SCl Morgan Hill SPEED DIS 7/8/2005 5/9/2006 5/9/2006 $188,100 $169,290 $169,290 $0 2009-06 F N/A N/A req'd; monitor progress. STEVENS CRK. BR. ON STEVENS Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting Santa Clara CANYON RD.37C-576 , BRIDGE approval; monitor for FMIS 59370461170 HBRR SCl County REPLACEMENT 12/11/1997 7/23/2008 3/24/2009 $75,000 $60,000 $60,000 $0 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. STEVENS CRK. BR. ON STEVENS Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting Santa Clara CANYON RD.37C-576 , BRIDGE approval; monitor for FMIS 5937046L110 HBRR SCl County REPLACEMENT 12/11/1997 7/23/2008 3/24/2009 $1,915,100 $1,684,435 $0 $1,684,435 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. STEVENS CRK. BR. ON STEVENS Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting Santa Clara CANYON RD.37C-576 , BRIDGE approval; monitor for FMIS 5937046Q110 HBRR SCl County REPLACEMENT 12/11/1997 7/23/2008 3/24/2009 $176,000 $140,800 $140,800 $0 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. STEVENS CRK. BR. ON STEVENS Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting Santa Clara CANYON RD.37C-577 , BRIDGE approval; monitor for FMIS 59370471170 HBRR SCl County REPLACEMENT 12/11/1997 7/23/2008 3/24/2009 $75,000 $60,000 $60,000 $0 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. STEVENS CRK. BR. ON STEVENS Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting Santa Clara CANYON RD.37C-577 , BRIDGE approval; monitor for FMIS 5937047L110 HBRR SCl County REPLACEMENT 12/11/1997 7/23/2008 3/24/2009 $2,029,800 $1,783,419 $0 $1,783,419 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. STEVENS CRK. BR. ON STEVENS Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting Santa Clara CANYON RD.37C-577 , BRIDGE approval; monitor for FMIS 5937047Q110 HBRR SCl County REPLACEMENT 12/11/1997 7/23/2008 3/24/2009 $146,000 $116,800 $116,800 $0 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction.

Data as of: 11/19/09 Page 3 of 5 LSRWGDate 120309 Printed: -11/30/2009 Page 13 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A Inactive List for September 2009 Quarterly Review (Review Period 07/01/09 - 09/30/09) Local and State Administered and Locally Funded Projects

Golden Gate Bridge, Highway And Transportation GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE , SEISMIC Confirmed FMIS invoice 6003017H070 DBF SF Distri RETROFIT PHASE III 9/7/2001 9/12/2008 9/25/2009 $2,609,513 $2,609,513 $2,576,937 $32,576 2009-09 A I N/A 11/12/09. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway And Transportation GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE , SEISMIC Confirmed FMIS invoice 6003017LE20 DBF SF Distri RETROFIT PHASE III 9/7/2001 9/12/2008 9/25/2009 $23,237,500 $23,237,500 $0 $23,237,500 2009-09 A I N/A 11/12/09. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway And Transportation GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE , SEISMIC Confirmed FMIS invoice 6003017LY10 DBF SF Distri RETROFIT PHASE III 9/7/2001 9/12/2008 9/25/2009 $5,662,027 $5,662,027 $0 $5,662,027 2009-09 A I N/A 11/12/09. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway And Transportation GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE , SEISMIC Confirmed FMIS invoice 6003017Q070 DBF SF Distri RETROFIT PHASE III 9/7/2001 9/12/2008 9/25/2009 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,974,347 $25,653 2009-09 A I N/A 11/12/09.

CIVIC CENTER PLAZA Project cancelled; investigating San Francisco BET.LEAVENWORTH AND HYDE , status. No agency action 5934097Q680 TCSE002 SF County LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, ETC. 8/18/2000 9/26/2006 9/26/2006 $936,325 $936,325 $936,325 $0 2009-09 N/A N/A N/A required. In Final Voucher process; San Francisco METRO EAST LINE RAIL awaiting decision if more docs L089804CR10 M SF County MAINT/STORAGE, PE 6/1/1993 6/28/1993 6/28/1993 $15,000,000 $1,288,050 $0 $1,288,050 2009-09 F N/A N/A req'd; monitor progress. SR101 FROM RALSTON AVE TO In Final Voucher process; HILLSDALE BLVD, CONSTRUCT awaiting decision if more docs 6204038Q230 STPLN SM Caltrans NB AUXILIARY LANE 7/25/2000 5/25/2007 5/25/2007 $9,350,312 $4,832,422 $4,416,436 $415,986 2009-06 F N/A N/A req'd; monitor progress.

PARKWAY BLVD AND UPRR No documentation CROSSING , GRADE received;submit copy of invoice 00140053610 DPC Sol Dixon SEPARATION 6/18/2003 7/28/2008 8/4/2009 $1,325,000 $1,060,000 $432,000 $628,000 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. WOOLNER AVE.FROM ENTERPRISE DR. TO SHELDON 5132026H210 STPLHSR Sol Fairfield ES , SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT 9/12/2007 9/14/2007 9/14/2007 $65,000 $53,100 $0 $53,100 2009-09 A I N/A Confirmed FMIS Invoice 11/2/09. 04-SOL-0-STA, RELIEVER ROUTE Solano FROM SR 12 TO 80 , No documentation Transportation PREPARATION OF CORRIDOR received;submit copy of invoice 6249004Q240 OCALROA Sol Authority EIS/EIR 4/23/1999 10/6/2006 8/5/2009 $1,321,000 $1,169,481 $1,169,481 $0 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. 04-SOL-0-STA, RELIEVER ROUTE Solano FROM SR 12 TO 80 , No documentation Transportation PREPARATION OF CORRIDOR received;submit copy of invoice 6249004Q920 OCALROA Sol Authority EIS/EIR 4/23/1999 10/6/2006 8/5/2009 $894,080 $715,263 $185,000 $530,263 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

HEALDSBURG AVENUE , No documentation HEALDSBURG AVENUE received;submit copy of invoice 5027009L230 STPL Son Healdsburg REHABILITATION 7/11/2007 7/17/2007 7/17/2007 $374,080 $240,000 $0 $240,000 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

Data as of: 11/19/09 Page 4 of 5 LSRWGDate 120309 Printed: -11/30/2009 Page 14 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A Inactive List for September 2009 Quarterly Review (Review Period 07/01/09 - 09/30/09) Local and State Administered and Locally Funded Projects

VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE No documentation STATE COMMENTS), SEISMIC received;submit copy of invoice 592002833D0 BRLZ Son Sonoma County RETROFIT 9/1/1996 5/25/2004 5/25/2004 $70,000 $44,265 $44,265 $0 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE No documentation STATE COMMENTS), SEISMIC received;submit copy of invoice 5920028Q120 BRLZ Son Sonoma County RETROFIT 9/1/1996 5/25/2004 5/25/2004 $200,000 $160,000 $160,000 $0 2009-06 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09. VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting STATE COMMENTS) , SEISMIC approval; monitor for FMIS 592003033D0 SEISMIC Son Sonoma County RETROFIT 9/1/1996 9/12/2008 9/18/2009 $50,000 $44,265 $44,265 $0 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting STATE COMMENTS) , SEISMIC approval; monitor for FMIS 5920030L1C0 SEISMIC Son Sonoma County RETROFIT 9/1/1996 9/12/2008 9/18/2009 $211,400 $187,150 $178,299 $8,851 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting STATE COMMENTS) , SEISMIC approval; monitor for FMIS 5920030L240 SEISMIC Son Sonoma County RETROFIT 9/1/1996 9/12/2008 9/18/2009 $1,773,134 $1,569,758 $0 $1,569,758 2009-09 I N/A N/A transaction. VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE Invoice rec'd by State, awaiting STATE COMMENTS), SEISMIC approval; monitor for FMIS 592003433D0 STPLZ Son Sonoma County RETROFIT 9/1/1996 6/7/2006 6/7/2006 $50,000 $44,265 $39,839 $4,427 2009-06 I N/A N/A transaction. SONOMA CREEK (WATMAUGH In Final Voucher process; ROAD) (BR NO 20C-0017) , awaiting decision if more docs 592003633D0 STPLZ Son Sonoma County SEISMIC RETROFIT 9/4/1996 12/28/2005 12/28/2005 $25,000 $22,132 $22,132 $0 2008-12 F N/A N/A req'd; monitor progress. SONOMA CREEK (WATMAUGH In Final Voucher process; ROAD) (BR NO 20C-0017) , awaiting decision if more docs 5920036Q100 STPLZ Son Sonoma County SEISMIC RETROFIT 9/4/1996 12/28/2005 12/28/2005 $115,000 $92,000 $44,000 $48,000 2008-12 F N/A N/A req'd; monitor progress. DUTCHER CREEK RD. ON In Final Voucher process; DUTCHER CREEK, REPLACE BR awaiting decision if more docs 592004333D0 STPLX Son Sonoma County RAIL & WIDEN(20C-0411) 12/1/1997 6/9/2006 6/9/2006 $9,000 $7,967 $7,967 $0 2009-06 F N/A N/A req'd; monitor progress. DUTCHER CREEK RD. ON In Final Voucher process; DUTCHER CREEK, REPLACE BR awaiting decision if more docs 5920043Q240 STPLX Son Sonoma County RAIL & WIDEN(20C-0411) 12/1/1997 6/9/2006 6/9/2006 $8,000 $7,082 $7,082 $0 2009-06 F N/A N/A req'd; monitor progress.

No documentation KINLEY DRIVE , UPGRADE METAL received;submit copy of invoice 5920101Q210 HES Son Sonoma County BEAM GUARDRAIL 4/4/2006 8/17/2007 8/17/2007 $170,600 $131,400 $22,500 $108,900 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

No documentation VARIOUS LOCATIONS , DEVELOP received;submit copy of invoice 5920102L1C0 HBRR Son Sonoma County BPMP 9/8/2006 9/13/2006 9/13/2006 $15,000 $13,279 $0 $13,279 2009-09 N/A N/A X or justification by 11/25/09.

TOTAL - D4 $156,888,713 $101,844,244 $43,656,473 $58,187,771

Data as of: 11/19/09 Page 5 of 5 LSRWGDate 120309 Printed: -11/30/2009 Page 15 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3A

Three Month Look Ahead Report (Dec-09) September Quarterly Review

Proj No Prefix Agency County Description Expenditure Auth Date Last Action Total Cost Federal Funds Expenditure Unexpended LPAMS Action Date Date Amount Balance I=Invoiced F= In Final Voucher Process R= Rejected Invoice A = Approved Invoice

333 MARITIME ST, PORT OF OAKLAND. , PURCHASE LNG 6057011 CML Port Of Oakland Ala EQUIPMENT . 12/4/2008 6/5/2007 12/4/2008 $3,014,500.00 $1,750,000.00 $266,362.95 $1,483,637.05 N/A DORMAN DR./ GARRARD TUNNEL, TUNNEL REPAIR AND 5137029 IBRLO2 Richmond CC POST CN MONITORIN 12/31/2007 9/11/2002 12/31/2007 $800,000.00 $500,000.00 $30,199.11 $469,800.89 N/A On State Rte. 242 from Concord Ave to Grant St./Solano Way (04- 5135003 STPLN Concord CC CC-R-111.2/R2.4 10/16/2006 3/1/1994 10/16/2006 $8,034,920.00 $6,000,000.00 $5,899,828.48 $100,171.52 R 3RD STREET,JEFFERSON STREET AND REDWOOD ROAD , 5042044 STPL Napa Nap REHABILITATION 12/13/2007 6/30/2006 12/13/2007 $2,233,142.00 $1,977,000.00 $1,748,223.77 $228,776.23 N/A ROBERTS RD 0.10 MILE SOUTH OF BLOSSOM HILL RD , 5067012 BRLO Los Gatos SCl REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE 37C-0343 10/20/2008 1/15/1999 9/1/2009 $509,456.00 $451,021.00 $0.00 $451,021.00 N/A ROBERTS RD 0.10 MILE SOUTH OF BLOSSOM HILL RD , 5067012 BRLO Los Gatos SCl REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE 37C-0343 10/20/2008 1/15/1999 9/1/2009 $292,000.00 $258,507.00 $211,296.76 $47,210.24 N/A ROBERTS RD 0.10 MILE SOUTH OF BLOSSOM HILL RD , 5067012 BRLO Los Gatos SCl REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE 37C-0343 10/20/2008 1/15/1999 9/1/2009 $2,445,989.00 $2,165,433.00 $0.00 $2,165,433.00 N/A ROBERTS RD 0.10 MILE SOUTH OF BLOSSOM HILL RD , 5067012 BRLO Los Gatos SCl REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE 37C-0343 10/20/2008 1/15/1999 9/1/2009 $188,000.00 $166,437.00 $0.00 $166,437.00 N/A ROBERTS RD 0.10 MILE SOUTH OF BLOSSOM HILL RD , 5067012 BRLO Los Gatos SCl REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE 37C-0343 10/20/2008 1/15/1999 9/1/2009 $254,549.00 $225,352.00 $0.00 $225,352.00 N/A SIERRA RD (FELTER RD TO 4.3 MILES SOUTHWEST) , WIDEN 5937114 HRRRL Santa Clara County SCl OR IMPROVE SHOULDER 11/1/2007 10/11/2007 11/1/2007 $90,000.00 $81,000.00 $0.00 $81,000.00 N/A Metropolitan Transporation 6084134 HPLUL Commission Various CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CITY CAR SHARE 11/1/2007 10/11/2007 11/1/2007 $368,490.00 $294,792.00 $0.00 $294,792.00 N/A Metropolitan Transporation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, STATION AREA PLANNING 6084146 STPL Commission Various GRANT PROGRAM 11/13/2008 10/20/2008 11/13/2008 $12,568,750.00 $10,055,000.00 $0.00 $10,055,000.00 N/A

Data as of 10/30/09 Page 1 of 1 Date Printed: 11/3/2009

LSRWG 120309 - Page 16 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3B

TO: Local Streets and Roads Working Group DATE: December 3, 2009 FR: Marcella Aranda

RE: Local Safety Programs Delivery Update

Caltrans has recently requested the RTPAs to assist them in improving the delivery rate for various Caltrans-administered federal local programs including the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), High Risk Rural Roads Program (HR3), Safe Routes to School (SR2S) and Local Highway Bridge Program (HBP). Considering that funds not delivered within established deadlines are lost to the State, as well as to the region, it is important that projects are delivered in a timely manner. Therefore, from now on, the region will be tracking the obligations of these projects on a regular basis to improve upon our own regional delivery, which is currently 34% for HSIP and 17% for HR3 (information on SR2S is expected to be available in January). If this low delivery rate is elevated and delivery priorities are established for these projects, the region should be able to achieve a similar delivery rate as the STP and CMAQ programs, which is over 100% delivery by April 30 of each year.

One possible way of elevating the importance of delivering these projects is to require any jurisdiction requesting STP/CMAQ funds to explain any delay in delivering HSIP, HR3, SR2S and Local HBP projects prior to programming STP/CMAQ funds in the TIP. Another possibility is to apply the STP/CMAQ delivery policies to the other federal local programs within the region.

In the interim, we have requested that jurisdictions report any delivery issues to their CMAs, who in turn will report back to the Working Group. The CMAs should submit their comments to Marcella Aranda via email to [email protected] by December 31, 2009.

We welcome any suggestions and insight in improving the delivery of these federal programs. With a little effort we can greatly improve delivery rate in this region.

Additional information regarding these programs is available online at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/HSIP/delivery_status.htm

Attachments: i. [DLAWUA] Announcement: Bridge and Safety Programs - New Web Page Announcement ii. HR3 Update iii. HSIP Update

LSRWG 120309 - Page 17 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3B

From: Frank Cao To: CC: Randy Ronning Date: 10/14/09 7:55 AM Subject: [DLAWUA] Announcement: Bridge and Safety Programs - New Web Page Announcement

Announcement:

The Office of Bridge and Safety Programs has developed new Safety Program Delivery Status Reports for the HSIP and HR3 programs. These reports are available on the Local Assistance website at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/HSIP/delivery_status.htm. There is a report by Overall Program, by Agency, by MPO and by Individual Project. The plan is to update these reports quarterly. The intent of these reports is to draw more attention to and improve the project delivery of federal-aid safety projects. Similar reports for the Federal Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program will be added to the next round of updates in January 2010.

If you have any questions about this announcement, please contact Randy Ronning at 916-653-4727.

Frank Cao Sr. Transportation Engineer, Ph.D. ITS Coordinator Division of Local Assistance, HQ Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916-653-0341 CALNET 453-0341 Fax: 916-654-2409

______DLA-Website-Updates-Announce mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dot.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/dla-website-updates-announce

LSRWG 120309 - Page 18 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3B High Risk Rural Road (HR3) Project List - District 4- Sorted by Agency Data as of 10/1/2009

General Project Information Baseline information Actual Project Delivery information Tracking of Project Delivery Milestones

Project District Agency MPO RTPA Project Location Description of Work Current Total Current Cycle PE Auth ROW Constructi Closed Obligated Last Invoice Expended Federal For Projects with no For Projects in For Projects in All Projects: Number Project Cost Programmed Date Auth on Auth out Date Federal Amt Payment Amt authorization: PE Phase: CON Phase: Have less than 6 Estimate Federal Funds Date Date ($) Date ($) Have less than 6 Have less than 2 Have less than 2 months elapsed COMMENTS ($) ($) months elapsed years elapsed since years elapsed since since last 'paid' since FTIP PE Authorization? CON Authorization? invoice or Approval? Authorization?

Metropolitan Patterson Pass Road at milepost 5933(089) 04 Alameda County MTC Transportation 6.4 in unincorporated Alameda Widen or Improve Shoulder $ 909,000 $ 818,100 1 12/19/08 $ 100,800 $ - 5 9 Commission County Metropolitan Alhambra Valley Road: 4700 to Contra Costa 5928(083) 04 MTC Transportation 6350 feet east of Castro Ranch Widen or Improve Shoulder $ 1,661,000 $ 900,000 1 1/3/08 $ 338,400 8/5/09 $ 213,479 County 55 Commission Road

Metropolitan Dear Valley Road from Marsh Creek Contra Costa 5928(084) 04 MTC Transportation Road to Briones Valley Road in east Widen or Improve Shoulder $ 1,001,000 $ 900,000 1 3/2/08 $ 131,400 4/8/09 $ 131,400 County 55 Commission Contra Costa County

Metropolitan Contra Costa Marsh Creek Road - west of Round 5928(085) 04 MTC Transportation Widen or Improve Shoulder $ 2,492,000 $ 900,000 1 2/24/08 $ 234,000 9/23/09 $ 234,000 County Valley Park to Lydia Lane 55 Commission

Metropolitan Realign and widen roadway and Marsh Creek Road from 2.0 to 2.5 5928(095) 04 Contra Costa County MTC Transportation shoulders; relocate utilities; improve $ 1,050,000 $ 900,000 2 7/16/09 $ 150,000 $ - miles west of Deer Valley Road 55 Commission highway signage and drainage

On Marsh Creek Road from 1 mile Widen roadway and shoulders; Metropolitan east of Russelmann Park Road to install guardrail; eliminate roadway 5928(096) 04 Contra Costa County MTC Transportation $ 900,000 $ 810,000 2 $ - $ - 3/4 mile west of Morgan Territory obstacles; install signs, stripes and 9 Commission Road pavement markers

Metropolitan Alhambra Valley Road from Bear 5928(098) 04 Contra Costa County MTC Transportation Creek Road to approximately 2200 Realign and widen roadway$ 900,000 $ 810,000 2 9/1/09 $ 200,000 $ - 5 Commission feet east Metropolitan Along Point Reyes Petaluma Road 04 Marin County MTC Transportation Upgrade guardrail $ 197,000 $ 177,300 2 $ - $ - near Nicasio Road 9 Commission Metropolitan Lucas Valley Road from Mile Post 04 Marin County MTC Transportation Install guardrail $ 115,500 $ 103,950 2 $ - $ - 4.7 to 4.8 9 Commission Metropolitan Wooden Valley Road from Solano Install guardrail, pavement markers, 04 Napa County MTC Transportation County Line (PM 0.0) to Highway $ 259,700 $ 233,730 2 $ - $ - and delineators 9 Commission 121 (PM 6.7) Metropolitan Upgrade guardrail; improve signs 04 Napa County MTC Transportation North Kelly Road at PM 1.50 $ 24,200 $ 21,780 2 $ - $ - and delineation 9 Commission Metropolitan Hicks Road from Shannon Road to Upgrade Guardrail (include new 5937(113) 04 Santa Clara County MTC Transportation $ 264,000 $ 237,600 1 10/12/07 3/19/09 $ 237,600 $ - Alamitos Road guardrail) 5 9 Commission Metropolitan Sierra Road from Felter Road to 4.3 5937(114) 04 Santa Clara County MTC Transportation Widen or Improve Shoulder $ 985,000 $ 886,500 1 10/11/07 $ 81,000 $ - miles southwest of Felter Road 5 9 Commission

Metropolitan Widen shoulders at spot locations; Felter Road between Calaveras 5937(129) 04 Santa Clara County MTC Transportation install guardrail, signs, stripes and $ 560,000 $ 504,000 2 4/3/09 $ 45,000 $ - Road and Sierra Road 5 9 Commission pavement markers

Metropolitan Gibson Canyon Road. 0.4 miles 5923(081) 04 Solano County MTC Transportation north of Pamela Lane to 0.65 miles Realign Roadway $ 468,050 $ 421,245 1 12/5/07 $ 84,600 7/9/09 $ 80,463 55 Commission north of Pamela Lane. Metropolitan Adobe Road at East Washington Install traffic signal; add turn lanes; 5920(113) 04 Sonoma County MTC Transportation $ 2,695,000 $ 900,000 2 12/19/08 $ 49,500 8/3/09 $ 49,500 Street widen roadway and shoulders 55 Commission

LSRWG 120309 - Page 19 of 118 Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3B Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Project List - Sorted by District and Agency Data as of 10/1/2009

General Project Information Baseline information Actual Project Delivery information Tracking of Project Delivery Milestones

Project District Agency MPO RTPA Project Location Description of Work Current Total Current Cycle PE Auth ROW Constructi Closed Obligated Last Invoice Expended Federal For Projects with no For Projects in For Projects in All Projects: Number Project Cost Programmed Date Auth on Auth out Date Federal Amt Payment Amt authorization: PE Phase: CON Phase: Have less than 6 Estimate Federal Funds Date Date ($) Date ($) Have less than 6 Have less than 2 Have less than 2 months elapsed COMMENTS months elapsed years elapsed since years elapsed since since last 'paid' since FTIP PE Authorization? CON Authorization? invoice or Approval? Authorization?

Metropolitan INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND 5933(096) 04 Alameda County MTC Transportation CASTRO VALLEY BLVD AND PROVIDE FRONTAGE $ 776,000 $ 698,400 2 8/14/09 $ 58,500 $ - 55 Commission WISTERIA ST. IMPROVEMENTS Metropolitan 5933(097) 04 Alameda County MTC Transportation $ 539,000 $ 485,100 2 2/23/09 $ 58,500 $ - 5 9 Commission FOOTHILL ROAD BETWEEN CAST REMOVE PERMANENT OBSTACK Metropolitan INTERSECTION OF HAMILTON INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL WITH 5306(014) 04 Campbell MTC Transportation $ 380,000 $ 342,000 1 12/7/07 9/12/08 $ 342,000 7/14/09 $ 33,363 AVE AND PHOENIX DR. INTERCONNECT. 55 Commission Metropolitan 5306(015) 04 Campbell MTC Transportation INSTALL COUNT DOWN $ 36,000 $ 32,400 2 8/25/09 $ 32,400 $ - 55 Commission VARIOUS LOCATIONS PEDESTRIAN HEADS Metropolitan 5306(016) 04 Campbell MTC Transportation $ 360,000 $ 324,000 2 $ - $ - 9 Commission CAMPBELL AVE AND LEIGH AVE INSTALL NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL REALIGN HORIZONTAL CURVE; Metropolitan WIDEN TRAVEL LANES, Contra Costa 5928(089) 04 MTC Transportation DEER VALLEY ROAD, 1/4 MILE SHOULDERS, AND BACKING; $ 1,300,000 $ 900,000 2 2/9/09 $ 170,000 9/9/09 $ 50,948 County 55 Commission TO 1/2 MILE SOUTH OF IMPROVE SIGNING AND CHADBOURNE RD. STRIPING

Metropolitan VARIOUS LOCATIONS ON THE 04 El Cerrito MTC Transportation OHLONE GREENWAY BIKE AND $ 588,100 $ 529,290 2 $ - $ - 9 Commission PED PATH BETWEEN FAIRMOUNTINSTALL IN-PAVEMENT AVE AND CUTTING BLVD. CROSSWALK LIGHTS. Metropolitan 5239(012) 04 El Cerrito MTC Transportation FAIRMONT AVE AND ASHBURY $ 692,100 $ 622,890 2 1/29/09 $ 83,252 $ - 5 9 Commission AVE INTERSECTION UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS; Metropolitan MODIFY CHANNELIZATION; 5239(013) 04 El Cerrito MTC Transportation $ 649,900 $ 584,910 2 8/27/09 $ 83,253 $ - PORTRERO AVE. BETWEEN EXTEND LEFT-TURN LANE; 55 Commission SOUTH 55TH ST AND 56 ST REMOVE RIGHT-TURN ISLAND Metropolitan INSTALL MEDIAN BARRIER; MOWRY AVE. EAST AND WEST 5322(030) 04 Fremont MTC Transportation INSTALL RAISED MEDIAN; $ 221,100 $ 198,990 1 11/28/07 $ 35,100 $ - OF OVERACKER AVE. 5 9 Commission IMPROVE DELINEATION.

Metropolitan PASEO PADRE PARKWAY FROM 5322(036) 04 Fremont MTC Transportation DECOTO RD. TO FREMONT REPLACE CONCRETE POLES $ 332,200 $ 298,980 2 4/8/09 $ 35,100 $ - 55 Commission BLVD. AND FROM THORNTON WITH ALUMINUM POLES WITHIN AVE. TO WALNUT AVE. MEDIAN Metropolitan CARLOS BEE BLVD. BETWEEN 5050(035) 04 Hayward MTC Transportation WEST LOOP RD. AND MISSION $ 805,000 $ 724,500 2 2/23/09 $ 72,000 $ - 5 9 Commission BLVD. REALIGN ROADWAY Metropolitan 04 Healdsburg MTC Transportation HEALDSBURG AVE. PIPER AND INSTALL IN-PAVEMENT $ 104,800 $ 83,800 2 $ - $ - 9 Commission PLAZA ST. CROSSWALK LIGHTS. Metropolitan CONSTRUCT NEW CURB AND 5404(017) 04 Lafayette MTC Transportation THE WARNER COURT CURVE. GUTTER AND REGRADE SIDE $ 71,500 $ 67,500 1 10/12/07 3/9/09 $ 82,462 9/16/09 $ 51,609 55 Commission SLOPES. Metropolitan S-CURVE PARALLEL TO RELIEZ 5404(018) 04 Lafayette MTC Transportation VALLEY CREEK NEAR INSTALL 250 LF OF GUARD RAIL $ 45,500 $ 40,950 1 3/8/08 3/8/08 7/9/09 $ 25,988 4/13/09 $ 25,988 Commission LAFAYETTE HIGH SCHOOL Metropolitan POINT REYES PETALUMA RD. INSTALL APPROX. 200FT 5927(060) 04 Marin County MTC Transportation SOUTH OF PLATFORM BRIDGE, $ 44,000 $ 39,600 1 10/28/08 $ 13,500 7/14/09 $ 1,819 GUARDRAIL 55 Commission MP 11.92 - MP 12.03.

BOLSA AVE (ABOVE 164 HILLSIDE AVE), CAMINO ALTO Metropolitan (950FT N/O AZALEA DR) , 522 INSTALL GUARDRAIL AT 5113(008) 04 Mill Valley MTC Transportation $ 389,300 $ 350,370 1 6/2/09 6/3/09 $ 350,370 $ - CASCADE AVE, 312 EDGEWOOD VARIOUS LOCATIONS. 55 Commission AVE, 160 ROSE AVE, AND 580 EDGEWOOD AVE.

INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL; Metropolitan INTERSECTION OF MORAGA RD CONSTRUCT RAISED MEDIAN; 5415(007) 04 Moraga MTC Transportation $ 668,300 $ 601,470 1 9/12/07 7/3/08 $ 601,470 7/9/09 $ 534,615 AND ASCOT DR. INSTALL PED/BIKE 55 Commission IMPROVEMENTS.

LSRWG 120309 - Page 20 of 118 Page 1 of 3 Printed On: 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3B Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Project List - Sorted by District and Agency Data as of 10/1/2009

General Project Information Baseline information Actual Project Delivery information Tracking of Project Delivery Milestones

Project District Agency MPO RTPA Project Location Description of Work Current Total Current Cycle PE Auth ROW Constructi Closed Obligated Last Invoice Expended Federal For Projects with no For Projects in For Projects in All Projects: Number Project Cost Programmed Date Auth on Auth out Date Federal Amt Payment Amt authorization: PE Phase: CON Phase: Have less than 6 Estimate Federal Funds Date Date ($) Date ($) Have less than 6 Have less than 2 Have less than 2 months elapsed COMMENTS months elapsed years elapsed since years elapsed since since last 'paid' since FTIP PE Authorization? CON Authorization? invoice or Approval? Authorization?

Metropolitan 04 Napa County MTC Transportation DEER PARK ROAD AND INSTALL SOLAR POWERED $ 19,300 $ 17,370 2 $ - $ - 9 Commission SUNNYSIDE ROAD SPEED SIGNS. WEST GRAND AVE. AT MARKET INSTALL PROTECTED LEFT- Metropolitan ST.; MACARTHUR BLVD. AT TURN PHASE WITH NEW LEFT 5012(096) 04 Oakland MTC Transportation $ 247,700 $ 222,930 2 $ - $ - FRUITVALE AVE.; MARKET ST. AT TURN LANE; INSTALL VIDEO AND 9 Commission 55TH ST. PEDESTRIAN DETECTION Metropolitan 5012(097) 04 Oakland MTC Transportation INSTALL COUNT-DOWN $ 89,600 $ 80,640 2 $ - $ - 9 Commission VARIOUS INTERSECTIONS PEDESTRIAN HEADS

RECONSTRUCT MEDIAN Metropolitan CHANNELIZATION; CONSTRUCT 04 Palo Alto MTC Transportation CURB RAMPS; UPGRADE $ 1,464,100 $ 900,000 2 $ - $ - 9 Commission SIGNALS; OVERLAY AND SAN ANTONIO RD. FROM SR 101 RESTRIPE RDWY; LENGTHEN TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT LEFT-TURN POCKETS REMOVE, REPLACE, REPAIR MBGR; INSTALL SIGNS, STRIPES, AND PAVEMENT Metropolitan MARKINGS; UPGRADE 04 Palo Alto MTC Transportation PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES; $ 2,211,000 $ 900,000 2 $ - $ - 9 Commission UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS; ALMA ST. FROM COLORADO LENGTHEN LEFT-TURN AVE. TO CITY LIMITS AT POCKETS; RESTORE CURB AND MOUNTAIN VIEW GUTTER Metropolitan CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN 5022(043) 04 Petaluma MTC Transportation EAST WASHINGTON ST. AND THE CROSSING AND INSTALL $ 565,900 $ 509,310 2 12/19/08 $ 116,100 6/23/09 $ 555 55 Commission PETALUMA RING TRAIL FLASHING BEACONS INSTALL PEDESTRIAN POWER AVE., APPROX. 700' ACTIVATED FLASHING Metropolitan WEST OF ANDREW AVE.; BEACONS; INSTALL IN- 5127(019) 04 Pittsburg MTC Transportation $ 127,200 $ 108,880 1 5/22/08 $ 10,888 $ - STONEMAN AVE AT PAVEMENT CROSSWALK 5 9 Commission MEADOWBROOK CIRCLE. LIGHTS AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS. Metropolitan 5127(022) 04 Pittsburg MTC Transportation WILLOW PASS ROAD AND $ 220,600 $ 198,540 2 3/19/09 9/2/09 $ 198,540 $ - 55 Commission BALCLUTHA TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT Metropolitan RELOCATE SIGNAL POLE AND 04 Pleasant Hill MTC Transportation PLEASANT HILL ROAD AND CONSTRUCT INTERSECTION $ 352,000 $ 316,800 2 $ - $ - 9 Commission GEARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. Metropolitan CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK; CONTRA COSTA BLVD. BETWEEN 5375(017) 04 Pleasant Hill MTC Transportation INSTALL COUNT DOWN $ 163,400 $ 147,060 1 12/19/08 $ 147,060 $ - TAYLOR BLVD. AND HARRIET DR. 5 9 Commission PEDESTRIAN HEADS. Metropolitan 5375(020) 04 Pleasant Hill MTC Transportation OAK PARK BLVD AND UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND $ 325,600 $ 293,040 2 4/14/09 $ 54,000 $ - 55 Commission PATTERSON BLVD PROVIDE LEFT-TURN LANE. VARIOUS LOCATIONS: TWIN PEAKS BLVD; O'SHAUGHNESSY Metropolitan BLVD AT DEL VALLE AVE; UPGRADE GUARDRAILS AND 5934(141) 04 San Francisco MTC Transportation $ 535,600 $ 482,040 1 3/2/08 6/16/09 $ 235,923 2/10/09 $ 235,923 PORTOLA DR. NORTH OF INSTALL END TREATMENTS. Commission BURNETT AVE. AND WEST OF BURNETT AVE. Metropolitan 6328(026) 04 San Francisco MTC Transportation FULTON ST. BETWEEN 8TH AVE $ 269,500 $ 242,550 2 1/15/09 $ 14,281 $ - 5 9 Commission AND 25TH AVE. RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMPS.

Metropolitan INSTALL EMERGENCY VEHICLE 6328(028) 04 San Francisco MTC Transportation $ 850,000 $ 765,000 2 9/1/09 $ 765,000 $ - VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE PRIORITY SYSTEM AT EXISTING 55 Commission TENDERLOIN AREA TRAFFIC SIGNALS Metropolitan 6328(031) 04 San Francisco MTC Transportation BAYSHORE BLVD. AND PAUL $ 360,000 $ 324,000 2 8/25/09 $ 40,500 $ - 55 Commission AVE. INTERSECTION UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNAL

LSRWG 120309 - Page 21 of 118 Page 2 of 3 Printed On: 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 3B Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Project List - Sorted by District and Agency Data as of 10/1/2009

General Project Information Baseline information Actual Project Delivery information Tracking of Project Delivery Milestones

Project District Agency MPO RTPA Project Location Description of Work Current Total Current Cycle PE Auth ROW Constructi Closed Obligated Last Invoice Expended Federal For Projects with no For Projects in For Projects in All Projects: Number Project Cost Programmed Date Auth on Auth out Date Federal Amt Payment Amt authorization: PE Phase: CON Phase: Have less than 6 Estimate Federal Funds Date Date ($) Date ($) Have less than 6 Have less than 2 Have less than 2 months elapsed COMMENTS months elapsed years elapsed since years elapsed since since last 'paid' since FTIP PE Authorization? CON Authorization? invoice or Approval? Authorization?

INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH Metropolitan INTERCONNECT; REMOVE PORK INTERSECTION OF WASHINGTON 5041(031) 04 San Leandro MTC Transportation CHOP ISLAND; RELOCATE $ 465,800 $ 419,220 1 3/2/08 4/14/09 $ 419,220 5/19/09 $ 57,993 AVE AND ESTABROOK ST. 55 Commission UTILITY POLE; INSTALL CURB RAMPS.

4 INTERSECTIONS WITH SAN Metropolitan MODIFY EXISTING MEDIAN; RAMON BLVD: MONTEVIDEO DR., 5437(016) 04 San Ramon MTC Transportation INSTALL REFUGE LANE; EXTEND $ 700,000 $ 630,000 1 10/29/07 4/27/08 $ 630,000 3/20/09 $ 407,736 WESTSIDE DR., TALAVERA DR., 5 9 Commission LEFT-TURN LANE. WOODBOROUGH WAY.

Metropolitan 5437(021) 04 San Ramon MTC Transportation ALCOSTA BLVD AND DAVONA DR $ 320,000 $ 288,000 2 8/25/09 $ 58,500 $ - 55 Commission INTERSECTION UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCT SHOULDER Metropolitan IMPROVEMENT; INSTALL MBGR; 04 Santa Clara County MTC Transportation $ 590,000 $ 531,000 2 $ - $ - BLACK RD. FROM SR 17 TO UPGRADE STRIPING AND 9 Commission SKYLINE BLVD. SIGNAGE Metropolitan UPGRADE TRAFFIC CONTROL CAPITAL EXPRESSWAY FROM 5937(117) 04 Santa Clara County MTC Transportation SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS $ 308,000 $ 277,200 1 12/7/07 1/12/09 $ 231,797 7/30/09 $ 45,580 HWY 680 TO HWY 87. 55 Commission AND DELINEATION.

Metropolitan INSTALL AND UPGRADE METAL QUIMBY RD FROM DEEDHAM DR. 5937(118) 04 Santa Clara County MTC Transportation BEAM GUARDRAIL; UPGRADE $ 258,500 $ 232,650 1 12/18/07 3/30/09 $ 232,650 $ - TO MT. HAMILTON RD (SR130). 5 9 Commission SIGNING AND STRIPING.

Metropolitan 04 Santa Rosa MTC Transportation SONOMA AVE BETWEEN SANTA RECONFIGURE ROADWAYS $ 580,000 $ 390,000 2 $ - $ - 9 Commission ROSA AVE AND HAHMAN DR. FOR BIKE LANES. CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS AND SARATOGA-LOS GATOS RD (SR Metropolitan CURB RAMPS; RELOCATE 9) BETWEEN BIG BASIN WAY IN 5332(011) 04 Saratoga MTC Transportation UTILITY POLE; SIGNING AND $ 1,020,000 $ 900,000 1 3/31/08 $ - $ - SARATOGA AND LOS GATOS 5 9 Commission STRIPING; CONSTRUCT BLVD IN LOS GATOS PED/BIKE BRIDGE. VARIOUS LOCATIONS ALONG Metropolitan CANTELOW RD, DIXON AVE, 5923(087) 04 Solano County MTC Transportation $ 382,000 $ 343,800 2 10/28/08 7/7/09 $ 343,800 7/9/09 $ 21,540 HALLEY RD, LYON RD, & 55 Commission ROCKVILLE RD. UPGRADE GUARDRAILS

LSRWG 120309 - Page 22 of 118 Page 3 of 3 Printed On: 11/30/2009 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

LSRWG 120309 - Page 23 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

LSRWG 120309 - Page 24 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

DIVISION OF LOCAL ASSISTANCE Guidelines and Timelines for Managing Local Assistance American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) Funding August 12, 2009

BACKGROUND

On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). Among its many provisions, Recovery Act provides California approximately $2.57 billion in federal apportionments for its Highway Infrastructure Investment Program.

Recovery Act specifies a sub-allocation of 30 percent of these funds to the regional planning agencies (Regions) through the Surface Transportation Program (STP) process which is “based on population”, and does not require sub-allocation of the remaining 70 percent (“any area” funds) designated to the State. The State had 120 days from the date of apportionment by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to obligate half of the “any area” funds. Any funds not obligated within the first 120 days were to be redistributed to states that were able to meet the deadline. California had approximately $900 million subject to the federal 120-day requirement that was required to be obligated by June 30, 2009.

On March 27, 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill (AB) x3 20. This new law established the distribution formula of federal economic stimulus funds, 62.5 percent to the Regions and 37.5 percent to the State. This additional influx of “any area” funding to the Regions was subject to the federal 120-day deadline of June 30, 2009. On April 3, 2009, the California Department of Transportation’s (Department) Division of Transportation Programming released final Recovery Act fund apportionment levels for the Regions. This includes Recovery Act funds sub-allocated “based on population” and the additional “any area” funds.

Description of Recovery Act Apportionments: The specific Recovery Act fund types that may be received by the Regions are:

“Based on Population” • C200 – Areas with Population equal to or less than 200,000 • C230 – Urbanized Areas over 200,000 Population • C250 – Rural Areas with Population under 5,000

“Any Area” • C220 – Transportation Enhancements • C240 – Available for Use in Any Area (flexible)

The federal reimbursement rate for projects using Recovery Act funds can be up to 100 percent, at the discretion of the Regions receiving the funding.

- 1 -

LSRWG 120309 - Page 25 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

DEADLINES

The following dates apply to the Regions based on the specific Recovery Act Highway Infrastructure Investment fund types:

• June 30, 2009 – Marks 120 days from March 2, 2009, the apportionment date of the Recovery Act funding by FHWA. A minimum and aggregate total of 50 percent of apportionments in “any area” must be obligated by the Regions and the State by this date. - California met this requirement by May 2009. - Following the June 30, 2009, deadline, there were no Recovery Act funds redistributed from the other states to California.

• March 2, 2010 – All remaining funding in Recovery Act apportionments “based on population” and the “any area” funds must be obligated by the Regions and the State. - Recovery Act funds not obligated by this deadline will be lost by that state and redistributed to other states that are able to obligate all of their Recovery Act funds.

• September 30, 2010 – Recovery Act funds not obligated by this date will lapse. - Recovery Act funds can not be obligated after September 30, 2010. - This date applies to Recovery Act funds that are redistributed, as well as Recovery Act funds deobligated from projects.

• September 30, 2015 – Final Recovery Act fund deadline. - Recovery Act funds not expended by this time will expire.

RESPONSIBILITES

Department: 1. Distribution of Recovery Act apportionments to the Regions. 2. Oversee and monitor the use of local Recovery Act funds. The Department will provide online delivery and monthly activity reports for District Local Assistance Engineers (DLAE) and the Regions. 3. Work closely with Regions and Local Agencies in the obligation of their Recovery Act funds. Regions (MPOs/RTPAs): 1. Ensure that projects using Recovery Act funds are programmed in the FTIP – including back-up projects and/or projects that may use redistributed Recovery Act funds, if any. 2. Ensure that any Recovery Act funding programmed is obligated in accordance with the deadlines of Recovery Act. 3. To expedite obligation of Recovery Act funds, Regions may consider swapping the recovery funds on projects that are already programmed in the FTIP through FTIP administrative modifications. Projects programmed in any of the four years of the FTIP may be advanced for delivery using Recovery Act funds.

- 2 -

LSRWG 120309 - Page 26 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

Local Agencies: 1. Submit any requests for authorization (RFA) for projects using Recovery Act funds in a timely manner and in accordance with the local assistance procedures manual (LAPM). 2. Ensure that all Federal and State requirements as set forth in the LAPM are being adhered to when submitting an RFA. [This includes, but is not limited, to the new federal Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) requirements.]

GUIDELINES

These guidelines will be implemented effective March 2, 2009.

Obligating Recovery Act Funding: 1. As of May 2009, the Department and Regions collectively obligated more than the required $900 million of the “any area” Recovery Act funds, approximately 60 days prior to the June 30, 2009 deadline. 2. The remaining Recovery Act funding will need to be obligated by March 2, 2010. 3. Each Region is strongly encouraged to obligate their share of Recovery Act funding as expeditiously as possible. 4. Any Region that will be unable to use their share of Recovery Act funding received in a timely manner may transfer their share to another Region. In such case, the Department’s Division of Local Assistance (DLA) Headquarters will need to receive a letter, co-signed by both Regions, agreeing to transfer of Recovery Act funds. It will be the responsibility of the donating and receiving agencies of the transfer, to adjust the programming amounts appropriately in the FTIP; the donating agency will have a decrease in programming capacity and the receiving agency will have an increase in programming capacity. Any replacement funding, as a result of this transfer of Recovery Act funding, will be outside the scope of oversight and responsibility of the Department as it relates to the Recovery Act funds. 5. ABx3 20 requires that Regions report to the Department for any Recovery Act funds that will not be obligated within the one year deadline. 6. ABx3 20 also authorizes the Department to redistribute the funds to other projects to ensure that California will continue to compete for additional funds through federal redistribution of Recovery Act funds. 7. The least flexible Recovery Act funds within each Region should be obligated first (such as C230 and C250). The most flexible Recovery Act funds (C240) should be obligated last. Therefore, if a Region is not able to use 100 percent of their Recovery Act funds, by any of the applicable deadlines, then the necessary redistribution of funds will be of the most flexible Recovery Act funds. 8. In order to avoid lost Recovery Act funds from later project savings, it is recommended that Regions use mixed federal funding for the projects that are using Recovery Act funds. Therefore, any cost savings can be applied to the non-Recovery Act funding, so as to keep the Recovery Act fund usage at 100 percent (particularly after the September 30, 2010 deadline).

Any additional funding received by California will be redistributed per timeline below.

- 3 -

LSRWG 120309 - Page 27 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

TIMELINES

June 30, 2009 • The 120th day from the receipt of the Recovery Act apportionments from FHWA. At this mark, a minimum of 50% of “any area” apportionments to states must be obligated or lost. ►Goal achieved by California as of May 4, 2009. ►Following the June 30, 2009, deadline, there were no Recovery Act funds redistributed from the other states to California.

November 1, 2009 • Regions MUST submit to the Department’s DLA Headquarters a report, with the amount of Recovery Act funds they plan to obligate. o Report shall include a list of Recovery Act funded projects that will be obligated by January 1, 2010, and specify ANY Recovery Act funds that will not be obligated by January 1, 2010. o Report should include a list of back-up Recovery Act funded projects that could be obligated if other projects are not ready or if any redistributed Recovery Act funds become available. Back-up projects will need to be obligated by January 1, 2010, as well and therefore must be programmed in the FTIP. To maintain financial constraints of the FSTIP, the back-up projects may initially be programmed using other funds and reconciliation can be done through an FTIP administrative modification. Regions and Local Agencies need to work with their DLAEs and the Department’s Division of Transportation Programming, as necessary, to ensure appropriate programming and use of the Recovery Act funds within the specified timelines. o The Department will provide a sample format of this report to the Regions.

December 1, 2009 • Local Agencies MUST submit “Draft” RFA to DLAEs.

December 15, 2009 • Local Agencies MUST submit “Final” project RFAs funded with Recovery Act funds to DLAEs. • After this date, the Department will not deobligate any funds until after March 2, 2010.

December 31, 2009 • Districts MUST submit RFAs for DLA Recovery Act funded projects to DLA Headquarters.

- 4 -

LSRWG 120309 - Page 28 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

January 1, 2010 • The Department’s DLA will redistribute any local Recovery Act funds that will not be used by Regions based on the “Final” RFAs. • Recovery Act funds will be distributed to: o Regions that will obligate 100 percent of their Recovery Act funds including the “Final” RFAs. o Regions that have back-up projects identified and programmed in the FTIPs (see November 1, 2009, of these timelines). • The redistribution will: o Be based on the ratio of the obligated funds of the eligible Region to the total obligated amount of all eligible Regions, depending on the amount of available funds to redistribute, if sufficient. o Ensure that DLA will use these funds on Local Assistance funded projects and continue to compete for and receive Recovery Act funds during the federal redistribution of Recovery Act funds.

January 2010 • The Department’s DLA Headquarters submits all timely and complete electronic RFAs (E76s) to FHWA; this includes RFAs for all redistributed funds, if any.

February 1, 2010 • The Department’s DLA notifies the Department’s Federal Resources Office of any Recovery Act funds that will not be obligated by DLA.

March 2, 2010 - One year date from March 2, 2009. • On this date, all remaining Recovery Act fund apportionments to the states must be obligated or lost to other states. • Obligation as used in these timelines is the date of FHWA approval.

March 2010 • FHWA Redistribution --FHWA Redistribution of Recovery Act funds from states that did not meet the March 2, 2010, obligation deadline.

If additional Recovery Act funds are received from FHWA: • Recovery Act funds will be split between the Regions and State per the same ratio in ABx3 20. • Recovery Act funds will be distributed to: o Regions that obligated 100 percent of their Recovery Act funds by the March 2, 2010, deadline. o The redistribution will be based on the ratio of the obligated funds of the eligible Region to the total obligated amount of all eligible Regions on March 2, 2010. • The Department’s Division of Transportation Programming will update Distribution Sheets, if necessary.

- 5 -

LSRWG 120309 - Page 29 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

July 1, 2010 • Local agencies MUST submit RFAs for Recovery Act funded projects to their DLAEs. • Regions MUST submit to the Department’s DLA Headquarters a report with the amount of any Recovery Act apportionments that they intend to obligate. o This report shall include a list of Recovery Act funded projects that will be obligated by August 1, 2010, and specify ANY Recovery Act funds that will not be obligated by August 1, 2010. o This report shall include a list of back-up Recovery Act funded projects that may be obligated if other projects are not ready for obligation or if any redistributed Recovery Act funds become available. Back-up projects will need to be obligated by August 1, 2010, as well and therefore must be programmed in the FTIP.

July 31, 2010 • Districts MUST submit RFAs for DLA Recovery Act funded projects to DLA Headquarters.

August 2010 • The Department’s DLA Headquarters submits all timely and complete electronic RFAs (E76s) to FHWA.

September 1, 2010 • The Department’s DLA notifies the Department’s Federal Resources Office of any Recovery Act funds that will not be obligated by DLA.

September 30, 2010 --Any Recovery Act funds not obligated will lapse. • Any Recovery Act funds deobligated after this date will not be available for future obligation. Recovery Act funds can not be obligated after September 30, 2010.

September 30, 2015 --Unexpended Recovery Funds will expire.

J:\PROJECT\Funding\ARRA\ARRA Obligations and Project Delivery\ARRA Cost Savings and Caltrans ARRA Funding Guidance\Caltrans ARRA Fund Mgmt Guidelines and Timelines 08-12-09.doc

- 6 -

LSRWG 120309 - Page 30 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

Program Supplement Sent to Local Agency but not Received Back As of 04-NOV-09 SF Bay Area November 4, 2009 Sent To District Project Local ARRA No. County Agency Name Project Title Prefix Number Agency Amnt

04 Alameda Alameda County Alameda County - Various Central County Roadways Rehab ESPL 5933(098) 07/15/09 1,496,782 04 Alameda Alameda County Alameda County - Various Eastern County Roadways Rehab ESPL 5933(099) 09/14/09 2,200,000 04 Alameda Berkeley Berkeley - University Avenue Paving - Phase 3 ESPL 5057(033) 10/21/09 1,200,000 04 Alameda San Leandro San Leandro - Springlake Drive Pavement Rehabilitation ESPL 5041(034) 09/28/09 559,000 04 Contra Costa Concord Concord - Monument Blvd Pedestrian Imps ESPLE 5135(038) 09/09/09 4,002,427 04 Contra Costa Martinez Martinez - Various Arterials Pavement Rehabilitation ESPL 5024(023) 08/10/09 663,000 04 Contra Costa Martinez Martinez - Marina Vista Streetscape ESPLE 5024(024) 09/09/09 157,000 04 San Mateo Redwood City Redwood City - El Camino Real/Broadway Streetscape ESPL 5029(021) 10/26/09 728,000 04 San Mateo San Bruno San Bruno - Various Roadway Resurfacing and Overlays ESPL 5226(016) 08/18/09 523,000 04 San Mateo San Carlos San Carlos - Various Streets Pedestrian Improvements ESPL 5267(013) 07/15/09 659,000 04 Santa Clara Campbell Campbell - East Campbell Ave Downtown Enhancements ESPLE 5306(013) 10/30/09 289,053 04 Santa Clara Gilroy Gilroy - Citywide Sidewalk Rehabilitation ESPL 5034(020) 07/08/09 218,000 04 Santa Clara Palo Alto Palo Alto - Lytton Avenue Resurfacing ESPL 5100(011) 07/08/09 850,000 04 Solano Dixon Dixon - Stratford Avenue Rehabilitation ESPL 5056(017) 10/15/09 500,000 04 Solano Vallejo Vallejo - Downtown Vallejo Streetscape ESPL 5030(048) 07/01/09 350,000 04 Sonoma Cotati Cotati - Old Redwood Highway Rehabilitation - South (Seg 1) ESPL 5383(007) 07/01/09 400,000 04 Sonoma Petaluma Petaluma - McDowell Blvd North Rehabilitation ESPL 5022(045) 10/15/09 580,000

J:\PROJECT\Funding\ARRA\ARRA Obligations and Project Delivery\[PSA Sent to Agency But Not Returned 11-04-09.xls]SFBay Area PSAs

LSRWG 120309 - Page 31 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Remaining ARRA FHWA Funds without E-76 Obligation November 17, 2009 MTC Regional E-76 Status/ Obligation County Local Agency Project Location/Description Project Number Location ARRA Amount Deadline Comments TOTAL $49,391,024 4 Alameda Alameda County CMA ACCMA - I-580 EB HOT Lane ESPL-6273(056) CT-HQ $7,500,000 11/30/2009 4 Alameda Caltrans Caltrans - SR-24 Realignment of WB SR 25 to NB SR 13 ARRAL-P024(031) CT ? $97,000 6/30/2009 4 Alameda Caltrans Caltrans - SR-24 Kay Street Widening and Signalization ARRAL-P024(032) CT ? $67,000 6/30/2009 4 Alameda City of Alameda Alameda City - Certain Streets Rehabilitation ESPL-5014(033) CT-HQ $350,000 11/30/2009 4 Alameda City of Livermore Livermore - Various Arterial Street Resurfacing ESPL-5053(020) FHWA-FMIS $350,000 11/30/2009 Submitted to FHWA on November 9, 2009 4 Alameda City of Oakland Oakland - Various Streets and Roads Preventive Maintenance ESPL-5012(101) FHWA-FMIS $1,255,000 11/30/2009 Submitted to FHWA on November 9, 2009 4 Alameda City of Pleasanton Pleasanton - Bernal Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation ESPL-5010(023) CT-HQ $370,000 11/30/2009 4 Alameda County of Alameda Alameda County - Various San Lorenzo/ Ashland Roadways Rehab ESPL-5933(101) CT-HQ $420,000 11/30/2009 4 Contra Costa County of Contra Costa Contra Costa County - Vasco Road Safety Imps ESPL-5928(093) CT-HQ $11,179,083 11/30/2009 4 Napa County of Napa Napa County - Silverado Trail Phase C Rehabilitation ESLP-5921(048) CT-HQ $380,000 11/30/2009 4 Napa Yountville Yountville - SR 29 Bicycle Safety Improvements ESPL-5395(001) CT-D4 ? $1,000,000 12/31/2009 Regional Obligation Deadline Extended to 12/31/09 4 San Francisco San Francisco MTA San Francisco - Pedestrian Signal Upgrade ESPLE-6328(029) Not Submitted $589,295 12/31/2009 Regional Obligation Deadline Extended to 12/31/09 4 San Mateo Caltrans Caltrans - FPI, San Mateo I-280: I-380 to SR 1 (CON) ARRAL-2801(125) CT ? $6,317,500 12/31/2009 Regional Obligation Deadline Extended to 12/31/09 4 San Mateo City of Belmont Belmont - US 101 Bike Bridge Overcrossing ESPLEHP-5268(004) CT-D4 ? $147,806 6/30/2009 4 Santa Clara Caltrans Caltrans - FPI, Santa Clara SB I-280: W of US 101 to E of I-880(CON) ARRAL-2801(124) CT ? $6,350,000 12/31/2009 Regional Obligation Deadline Extended to 12/31/09 4 Santa Clara Caltrans Caltrans - FPI, Santa Clara NB I-280: W of US 101 to E of I-880 (CON) ARRAL-2801(123) CT ? $4,480,000 12/31/2009 Regional Obligation Deadline Extended to 12/31/09 4 Santa Clara City of Morgan Hill Morgan Hill - Peak Avenue and Church Street Resurfacing ESPl-5152(020) Not Submitted $107,000 11/30/2009 E-76 RFA not yet submitted to Caltrans D-4 4 Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Palo Alto - Alma Street Concrete Restoration ESPL-5100(013) Not Submitted $209,000 11/30/2009 E-76 RFA not yet submitted to Caltrans D-4 4 Santa Clara City of San Jose San Jose - Various Streets Resurfacing and Rehabilitation ESPL-5005(099) Not Submitted $2,443,000 11/30/2009 E-76 RFA not yet submitted to Caltrans D-4 4 Santa Clara City of Saratoga Saratoga - Saratoga Ave and Fruitvale Ave Overlay and Rehab ESPL-5332(015) Not Submitted $137,000 11/30/2009 E-76 RFA not yet submitted to Caltrans D-4 4 Santa Clara Santa Clara VTA Santa Clara VTA - SR 85 Express HOT Lanes ESPL-6264(044) CT-D4 ? $3,300,000 11/30/2009 4 Santa Clara Town of Los Gatos Los Gatos - Prospect Area Street Rehabilitation ESPL-5067(015) Not Submitted $102,000 11/30/2009 E-76 RFA not yet submitted to Caltrans D-4 4 Solano City of Fairfield Fairfield - Suisun Valley Road Rehabilitation ESPL-5132(036) Not Submitted $538,000 11/30/2009 E-76 RFA not yet submitted to Caltrans D-4 4 Solano City of Fairfield Fairfield - GFI Fareboxes purchase and implementation FTAESPL-5132(037) FHWA $172,340 11/30/2009 Submitted to FHWA on October 15, 2009 4 Solano City of Suisun City Suisun City - Main Street Rehabilitation ESPL-5032(024) Not Submitted $170,000 11/30/2009 E-76 RFA not yet submitted to Caltrans D-4 4 Solano County of Solano Solano County - Various Streets Overlay Phase 2 ESPL-5923(093) CT-HQ $360,000 11/30/2009 4 Sonoma City of Santa Rosa Santa Rosa - Mendocino Avenue ITS Improvements ESPL-5028(054) CT-HQ $1,000,000 11/30/2009 TOTAL $49,391,024 J:\PROJECT\Funding\ARRA\ARRA Obligations and Project Delivery\[ARRA Unobligated Projects - 11-17-09.xls]ARRA Remaining Obligations

LSRWG 120309 - Page 32 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

SF Bay Area ARRA Project Status November 18, 2009 (amounts in millions) $300

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

$0 Strategic Investments, Including: Local Road Maintenance Transit Maintenance Transit Train to Plane State Funded Hwy Smart Hwy - FPI & HOT, TE (134 Projects) (80 Projects) Oakland Airport Connector Including Caldecott Safety and Caldecott $145 Million $286 Million (1 Project) and Doyle Drive (27 Projects) $70 Million (12 Projects) $160 Million SF Bay Area ARRA Funding Categories $199 Million

Available/Programmed Obligated/FTA Grant Awarded Contract Awarded Total Available: 254 Projects totalling $861 Million Obligations to Date: 223 Projects totalling $682 Million (79%) Awarded Contracts to Date: 177 Projects totalling $593 Million (69%)

LSRWG 120309 - Page 33 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

SF Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Highway Strategic Investments, Prop 1B Backfill, Smart Highways, Safety and Transportation Enhancements November 18, 2009 Contract Project 1511 1511 Total ARRA Obligation Remaining Obligation Contract Award Contract Award County Implementing Agency Project Title Type TIP ID No. Cert # Cert Date Federal Project ID Funding Obligation Amount Date Balance Deadline Amount Award Date Deadline

27 MTC - Strategic Investments $160,106,295 $119,257,694 $40,848,601 18 $99,657,000 1 MTC - Regional Element ARRA - Highway Strategic Investments - Safety and Smart Hwys $32,000,000

Contra Costa County of Contra Costa Contra Costa County - Vasco Road Safety Imps Safety CC-050030 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPLDEMO-5928(093) $10,000,000 Pending - HQ $10,000,000 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 Napa Yountville Yountville - SR 29 Bicycle Safety Improvements Safety NAP090001 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5395(001) $1,000,000 $1,000,000 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 San Mateo Caltrans FPI, San Mateo - I-280 PM 20.3 TO 27.3, Install Ramp Metering Elements (PE) Smart Hwys REG090003 Cert #7 7/28/2009 ARRAL-2801(125) $682,500 $682,500 9/2/2009 $0 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 San Mateo Caltrans Caltrans - FPI, San Mateo I-280: I-380 to SR 1 (CON) Smart Hwys REG090003 Cert #7 7/28/2009 ARRAL-2801(125) $6,317,500 $6,317,500 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 Santa Clara Caltrans FPI, Santa Clara , I-280 From PM 1.0 TO PM 4.5, New TOS & Ramp Metering Equipment (PE) Smart Hwys REG090003 Cert #7 7/28/2009 ARRAL-2801(124) $650,000 $650,000 8/29/2009 $0 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 Santa Clara Caltrans Caltrans - FPI, Santa Clara I-280: I-280 From PM 1.0 TO PM 4.5 (CON) Smart Hwys REG090003 Cert #7 7/28/2009 ARRAL-2801(124) $6,350,000 $6,350,000 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 Santa Clara Caltrans FPI, Santa Clara , I-280 From PM 2 TO PM 5, New TOS & Ramp Metering Equipment (PE) Smart Hwys REG090003 Cert #7 7/28/2009 ARRAL-2801(123) $520,000 $520,000 8/29/2009 $0 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 Santa Clara Caltrans Caltrans - FPI, Santa Clara I-280 From PM 2 TO PM 5 (CON) Smart Hwys REG090003 Cert #7 7/28/2009 ARRAL-2801(123) $4,480,000 $4,480,000 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 Solano Fairfield Solano County - McGary Road Safety Improvements Safety SOL090004 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5132(032) $1,000,000 $1,000,000 9/24/2009 $0 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 Sonoma Santa Rosa Santa Rosa - Mendocino Avenue ITS Improvements Safety SON090006 Cert #7 7/28/2009 ESPL-5028(054) $1,000,000 Pending - HQ $1,000,000 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 SUBTOTAL $32,000,000 $2,852,500 $29,147,500 $0

MTC - State Element ARRA - Highway Strategic Investments - Prop 1B Backfill and Smart Hwys $118,457,000

ALA/CC Caltrans Caltrans - SR-24 Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore Prop 1B Backfill CC-010002 4/28/2009 4/28/2009 SARRA-P024(030) $99,657,000 $99,657,000 5/2/2009 $0 6/30/2009 $99,657,000 11/10/2009 12/31/2009 Alameda Caltrans Caltrans - SR-24 Realignment of WB SR 25 to NB SR 13 Prop 1B Backfill CC-010002 4/28/2009 4/28/2009 ARRAL-P024(031) $4,700,000 $4,603,000 9/24/2009 $97,000 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 Alameda Caltrans Caltrans - SR-24 Kay Street Widening and Signalization Prop 1B Backfill CC-010002 4/28/2009 4/28/2009 ARRAL-P024(032) $600,000 $533,000 9/24/2009 $67,000 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 Alameda Alameda County CMA ACCMA - I-580 EB HOT Lane Smart Hwys ALA070020 Cert #10 8/31/2009 ESPL-6273(056) $7,500,000 Pending - HQ $7,500,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Santa Clara Santa Clara VTA Santa Clara VTA - SR 237 - I-880 HOT Connector Smart Hwys SCL090029 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPL-6264(042) $2,700,000 $2,700,000 9/22/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Santa Clara Santa Clara VTA Santa Clara VTA - SR 85 Express HOT Lanes Smart Hwys SCL090030 Cert #10 8/31/2009 ESPL-6264(044) $3,300,000 $3,300,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 SUBTOTAL $118,457,000 $107,493,000 $10,964,000 $99,657,000

MTC - State Element TE ARRA - Transportation Enhancement Projects $9,649,295

Alameda Oakland Oakland - West Oakland 7th Street TOD TE-Bike/Ped ALA050080 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPL-5012(100) $1,300,000 $1,300,000 8/4/2009 $0 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 Contra Costa Concord Concord - Monument Blvd Pedestrian Imps TE-Bike/Ped CC-070083 Cert #5 6/11/2009 ESPL-5135(038) $1,000,000 $1,000,000 8/7/2009 $0 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 Contra Costa Martinez Martinez - Marina Vista Streetscape TE-Bike/Ped CC-070085 Cert #5 6/11/2009 ESPL-5024(024) $127,000 $127,000 8/7/2009 $0 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 San Francisco SFMTA San Franciso - Inner Sunset Traffic Calming and Enhancements TE-Enhancement SF-070033 Cert #5 6/11/2009 ESPLE-6328(030) $632,295 $343,000 9/9/2009 $289,295 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 San Francisco SFMTA San Francisco - Pedestrian Signal Upgrade TE-Bike/Ped SF-090029 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPLE-6328(029) $300,000 $300,000 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 San Mateo Belmont Belmont - US 101 Bike Bridge Overcrossing TE-Bike/Ped SM-070005 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPLEHP-5268(004) $2,100,000 $1,952,194 9/3/2009 $147,806 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 Santa Clara Campbell Campbell - East Campbell Ave Downtown Enhancements TE-Bike/Ped SCL070022 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPLE-5306(013) $2,160,000 $2,160,000 8/22/2009 $0 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 Solano Benicia Benicia - I-780 State Park Overcrossing TE-Bike/Ped SOL070005 Cert #5 6/11/2009 STPLE-5003(023) $320,000 $320,000 7/2/2009 $0 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 Solano City of Fairfield Farifield - McGary Road Enhancements TE-Bike/Ped SOL090004 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5132(032) $640,000 $640,000 9/24/2009 $0 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 Solano County of Solano Solano County - Old Town Cordelia Improvements Phase 2 TE-Bike/Ped SOL050046 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPLE-5923(092) $800,000 $800,000 8/5/2009 $0 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 Sonoma Windsor Windsor - Old Redwood Hwy Pedestrian Enhancements TE-Bike/Ped SON070005 Cert #5 6/11/2009 ESPLE-5472(014) $270,000 $270,000 8/22/2009 $0 6/30/2009 12/31/2009 SUBTOTAL $9,649,295 $8,912,194 $737,101 $0

MTC - Hwy, Safety and TE - TOTAL $160,106,295 $119,257,694 $40,848,601 $99,657,000

J:\PROJECT\Funding\ARRA\ARRA Obligations and Project Delivery\[MTC-SFBayArea ARRA Obligations Status 11-18-09.xls]State Discretionary

LSRWG 120309 - Page 34 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

SF Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Local Streets and Roads System Preservation Projects November 18, 2009 Anticipated Contract Award + Anticipated Contract Project 1511 1511 Total ARRA Obligation Remaining Obligation Contingencies + Contract Award County Implementing Agency Project Title Type TIP ID No. Cert # Cert Date Federal Project ID Funding Obligation Amount Date Balance Deadline Support Award Date Deadline

134 MTC - Local Streets and Roads System Preservation $145,480,410 $139,893,842 $5,586,568 122 $115,728,171 111 ALAMEDA $29,380,000 Alameda City of Alameda Alameda City - Various Streets Rehabilitation Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5014(032) $1,304,000 $1,304,000 6/24/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,304,000 7/21/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda City of Alameda Alameda City - Certain Streets Rehabilitation Rehab REG090025 Cert #7 7/28/2009 ESPL-5014(033) $350,000 Pending - HQ $350,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Alameda County of Alameda Alameda County - Various Central County Roadways Rehab Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5933(098) $2,200,000 $2,200,000 6/18/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,488,903 9/29/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda County of Alameda Alameda County - Various Eastern County Roadways Rehab Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5933(099) $1,200,000 $1,200,000 6/24/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,200,000 9/15/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda County of Alameda Alameda County - Various San Lorenzo/ Ashland Roadways Rehab Rehab REG090025 Cert #10 8/31/2009 ESPL-5933(101) $420,000 $420,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Alameda City of Berkeley Berkeley - University Ave from San Pablo to Sacramento Rehab Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5057(032) $1,619,000 $1,619,000 4/30/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,619,000 9/17/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda City of Berkeley Berkeley - University Avenue Paving - Phase 3 Rehab REG090025 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPL-5057(033) $400,000 $400,000 9/19/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Alameda City of Fremont Fremont - Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5322(035) $6,677,000 $6,677,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $5,907,000 7/14/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda City of Hayward Hayward - Local Streets and Roads Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5050(036) $2,037,000 $2,037,000 5/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,037,000 6/30/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda City of Hayward Hayward - Industrial Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090025 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPL-5050(037) $475,000 $475,000 8/6/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Alameda City of Livermore Livermore - Various Arterial Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5053(018) $1,479,000 $1,479,000 6/24/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,479,000 7/27/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda City of Livermore Livermore - Various Arterial Street Resurfacing Rehab REG090025 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5053(020) $350,000 $350,000 11/18/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Alameda City of Oakland Oakland - Various Streets and Roads Rehabilitation Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5012(099) $4,774,000 $4,774,000 5/13/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $3,857,444 9/22/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda City of Oakland Oakland - Citywide Curb Ramp and Sidewalk Repair Bike/Ped REG090007 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5012(098) $1,194,000 $1,194,000 5/14/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,118,831 9/22/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda City of Oakland Oakland - Various Streets and Roads Preventive Maintenance Rehab REG090025 Cert #10 8/31/2009 ESPL-5012(101) $1,255,000 $1,255,000 11/18/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Alameda City of Pleasanton Pleasanton - Various City Streets Overlay Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5101(022) $1,588,000 $1,588,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,216,711 8/18/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda City of Pleasanton Pleasanton - Bernal Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090025 Cert #10 8/31/2009 ESPL-5101(023) $370,000 Pending - HQ $370,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Alameda City of San Leandro San Leandro - Aladdin Ave and Washington Ave Rehab Rehab REG090025 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5041(033) $1,338,000 $1,338,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,131,021 7/9/2009 9/30/2009 Alameda City of San Leandro San Leandro - Springlake Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090025 Cert #7 7/28/2009 ESPL-5041(034) $350,000 $350,000 9/9/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 SUBTOTAL $29,380,000 $28,240,000 $1,140,000 $22,358,910

CONTRA COSTA $21,290,000 Contra Costa City of Antioch Antioch - Hillcrest Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5038(021) $1,605,000 $1,605,000 6/6/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,605,000 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Brentwood Brentwood - Balfour Road Overlay Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5300(008) $1,074,000 $1,074,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,074,000 7/28/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Clayton Clayton - Various Arterials Overlay Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5386(009) $554,000 $554,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $508,687 8/4/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Concord Concord - Clayton Rd from Market St to Oakland Ave Rehab Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5135(036) $1,270,000 $1,270,000 5/28/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,270,000 9/14/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Concord Concord - Clayton Road Intersection Improvements Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5135(037) $584,000 $584,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $584,000 7/27/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa County of Contra Costa Contra Costa County - Vasco Road Overlay, Segments 3, 4 & 5 Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5928(091) $2,762,000 $2,762,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,945,770 7/21/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa Town of Danville Danville - Diablo Road/Green Valley Road Rehabilitation Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5434(18) $971,000 $971,000 7/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $971,000 9/1/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of El Cerrito El Cerrito - Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Project Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5239(014) $678,000 $678,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $678,000 7/31/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Hercules Hercules - San Pablo Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5117(008) $671,000 $671,000 7/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $671,000 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Lafayette Lafayette - Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5404(020) $744,000 $744,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $744,000 7/9/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Martinez Martinez - Various Arterials Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5024(23) $850,000 $850,000 7/10/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $850,000 9/2/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa Town of Moraga Morgaga - Moraga Rd Pavement Resurfacing Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5415(010) $609,000 $609,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $609,000 7/22/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Oakley Oakley - Oakley Road Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5477(003) $402,000 $402,000 7/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $402,000 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Oakley Oakley - Delta Road Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5477(004) $403,000 $403,000 6/12/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $380,352 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa Town of Orinda Orinda - Charles Hill /Honey Hill /Miner Road Pavement Rehab Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5444(013) $694,000 $694,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $399,108 7/21/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Pinole Pinole - San Pablo Ave Fern/Alvarez/Quinan Crosswalk Safety Imps Bike/Ped REG090007 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5126(010) $214,000 $214,000 7/9/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $214,000 8/18/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Pinole Pinole - Appian Way Pavement Overlay Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5126(012) $420,000 $420,000 7/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $420,000 8/18/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Pittsburg Pittsburg - Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5127(023) $1,103,000 $1,103,000 7/10/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,103,000 9/21/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Pleasant Hill Pleasant Hill - Contra Costa Boulevard Pavement Rehab Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5375(021) $842,000 $842,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $842,000 7/31/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Richmond Richmond - Carlson Boulevard Improvements Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5137(037) $1,578,000 $1,578,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,578,000 9/22/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of San Pablo San Pablo - San Pablo Avenue Overlay Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5303(013) $694,000 $694,000 7/17/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $694,000 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of San Ramon San Ramon - San Ramon Valley Blvd: Norris to Bollinger Canyon Rehab Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5437(022) $1,122,000 $1,122,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,122,000 7/28/2009 9/30/2009 Contra Costa City of Walnut Creek Walnut Creek - Civic Dr. from Arroyo Way to Walden Rd Rehab Rehab REG090026 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5225(022) $1,446,000 $1,446,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,009,136 7/21/2009 9/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $21,290,000 $21,290,000 $0 $19,674,053

MARIN $5,730,410 Marin Town of Corte Madera Corte Madera - Pavement Resurfacing Rehab REG090027 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5232(009) $174,000 $174,000 7/10/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $125,100 9/15/2009 9/30/2009 Marin Town of Fairfax Fairfax - Sir Francis Drake Blvd Resurfacing Rehab REG090027 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5277(024) $167,000 $167,000 7/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $167,000 9/3/2009 9/30/2009 Marin City of Larkspur Larkspur - Various Streets Resurfacing Rehab REG090027 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5166(022) $236,000 $236,000 7/17/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $236,000 9/2/2009 9/30/2009 Marin County of Marin Marin County - Various Roads Phase A Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090027 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5927(068) $2,097,410 $2,097,410 8/6/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,993,435 9/25/2009 9/30/2009 Marin City of Mill Valley Mill Valley - Edgewood Avenue Rehabilitation Rehab REG090027 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5113(010) $335,000 $335,000 7/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $286,439 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 Marin City of Novato Novato - Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090027 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5361(022) $1,062,000 $1,062,000 7/17/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,062,000 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 Marin Town of San Anselmo San Anselmo - Saunders Ave Rehabilitation Rehab REG090027 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5159(014) $267,000 $267,000 7/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $242,000 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 Marin City of San Rafael San Rafael - Various Streets Resurfacing Rehab REG090027 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5043(030) $1,188,000 $1,188,000 7/10/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,188,000 9/10/2009 9/30/2009 Marin Town of Tiburon Tiburon - Reed Ranch Road and Ridge Road Overlay Rehab REG090027 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5388(008) $204,000 $204,000 7/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $204,000 8/19/2009 9/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $5,730,410 $5,730,410 $0 $5,503,974

NAPA $3,800,000 Napa City of American Canyon American Canyon - Various Streets and Roads Rehabilitation Rehab REG090028 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPLSTP-5470(007) $320,000 $320,000 8/26/2009 $0 5/31/2009 9/30/2009 Napa City of Napa Napa City - Various Streets and Roads Rehabilitation Rehab REG090028 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5042(049) $1,600,000 $1,600,000 7/17/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,600,000 8/19/2009 9/30/2009 Napa County of Napa Napa County - Silverado Trail Phase A & B Rehabilitation Rehab REG090028 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5921(046) $725,000 $725,000 7/10/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $570,905 9/15/2009 9/30/2009 Napa County of Napa Napa County - Hardman Ave Rehabilitation Rehab REG090028 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5921(045) $775,000 $775,000 7/9/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $514,187 9/15/2009 9/30/2009 Napa County of Napa Napa County - Silverado Trail Phase C Rehabilitation Rehab REG090028 Cert #5 6/11/2009 ESLP-5921(048) $380,000 Pending - HQ $380,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 SUBTOTAL $3,800,000 $3,420,000 $380,000 $2,685,092

SAN FRANCISCO $13,540,000 San Francisco San Francisco DPW San Francisco - Jones Street Pavement Renovation Rehab REG090029 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5934(147) $2,066,000 $2,066,000 4/30/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,410,277 7/20/2009 9/30/2009 San Francisco San Francisco DPW San Francisco - Turk Street Pavement Renovation Rehab REG090029 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5934(148) $1,549,000 $1,549,000 4/30/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,195,042 7/21/2009 9/30/2009 San Francisco San Francisco DPW San Francisco - Divisadero Street Pavement Renovation Rehab REG090029 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPLCM-5934(149) $3,227,000 $3,227,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,395,830 8/10/2009 9/30/2009 San Francisco San Francisco DPW San Francisco - 7th Ave & Laguna Honda Pavement Renovation Rehab REG090029 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5934(150) $3,840,000 $3,840,000 4/30/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,787,467 8/19/2009 9/30/2009 San Francisco San Francisco DPW San Francisco - Geary Boulevard Intersections Paving Rehab REG090029 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5934(151) $668,000 $668,000 4/30/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $524,462 7/15/2009 9/30/2009

LSRWG 120309 - Page 35 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

134 MTC - Local Streets and Roads System Preservation $145,480,410 $139,893,842 $5,586,568 122 $115,728,171 111 San Francisco San Francisco DPW San Francisco - Bush Street Pavement Renovation Rehab REG090029 Cert #5 6/11/2009 ESPL-5934(152) $1,115,000 $1,115,000 9/24/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 San Francisco San Francisco DPW San Francisco - Various Curb Ramps Accessiblity Imps #1 Rehab REG090029 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPL-5934(153) $1,075,000 $1,075,000 9/24/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 SUBTOTAL $13,540,000 $13,540,000 $0 $8,313,079 SAN MATEO $13,210,000 San Mateo City of Atherton Atherton - Various Roadways Rehabilitation Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5261(006) $468,000 $468,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $463,000 7/15/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Belmont Belmont - Various Streets Overlay Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5268(015) $464,000 $464,000 6/12/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $464,000 8/14/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Brisbane Brisbane - Bayshore Blvd Overlay Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5376(008) $131,000 $131,000 5/28/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $131,000 7/6/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Burlingame Burlingame - Various Streets Resurfacing Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5171(016) $551,000 $551,000 5/13/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $551,000 7/20/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Colma Colma - Serramonte Blvd Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5264(003) $131,000 $131,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $131,000 8/19/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Daly City Daly City - Various Streets Resurfacing Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5196(032) $1,363,000 $1,363,000 6/3/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,045,000 8/24/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of East Palo Alto East Palo Alto - Various Streets Rehab and Resurfacing Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5438(008) $421,000 $421,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $421,000 9/22/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Foster City Foster City - Foster City Blvd Resurfacing Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5409(015) $440,000 $440,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $440,000 8/3/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Half Moon Bay Half Moon Bay - Downtown Streets Rehabilitation Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5357(005) $210,000 $210,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $210,000 8/4/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Hillsborough Hillsborough - Various Streets Overlay Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5191(004) $392,000 $392,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $392,000 8/10/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Menlo Park Menlo Park - Various Streets Resurfacing Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5273(020) $635,000 $635,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $635,000 7/24/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Millbrae Millbrae - Various Streets Rehabilitation Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5299(011) $382,000 $382,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $382,000 8/10/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Pacifica Pacifica - Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5350(016) $677,000 $677,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $677,000 7/14/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Portola Valley Portola Valley - Various Streets Resurfacing Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5390(004) $196,000 $196,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $196,000 9/17/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Redwood City Redwood City - Various Streets Overlay Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5029(020) $736,000 $736,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $736,000 7/27/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of Redwood City Redwood City - El Camino Real/Broadway Streetscape Bike/Ped REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5029(021) $523,000 $523,000 5/1/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $523,000 9/14/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of San Bruno San Bruno - Various Roadway Resurfacing and Overlays Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5226(016) $659,000 $659,000 7/23/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $659,000 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of San Carlos San Carlos - Various Streets Pedestrian Improvements Bike/Ped REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5267(013) $559,000 $559,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $264,000 9/14/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of San Mateo San Mateo City - Various Streets Rehabiliation Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5102(034) $1,545,000 $1,545,000 5/28/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,196,775 7/30/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo City of South San Francisco South San Francsico - Various Streets Resurfacing Rehab REG090007 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5177(022) $1,001,000 $1,001,000 5/13/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $816,451 8/25/2009 9/30/2009 San Mateo County of San Mateo San Mateo County - Various Streets Resurfacing Rehab REG090030 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5935(054) $1,726,000 $1,726,000 5/28/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,726,000 7/22/2009 9/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $13,210,000 $13,210,000 $0 $12,059,226

SANTA CLARA $31,550,000 Santa Clara City of Campbell Campbell - Citywide Arterials Phase 1 Surfacing Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5306(018) $694,000 $694,000 6/17/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $594,000 8/17/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Cupertino Cupertino - Homestead Road Rehabilitation Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5318(025) $757,000 $757,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $707,000 9/1/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Gilroy Gilroy - Citywide Sidewalk Rehabilitation Bike/Ped REG090007 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5034(020) $663,000 $663,000 6/12/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $663,000 9/21/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Los Altos Los Altos - San Antonio Road Resurfacing Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5309(013) $253,000 $253,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $100,000 9/8/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara Town of Los Altos Hills Los Altos Hills - Moody Rd and Page Mill Rd Rehabilitation Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5324(005) $316,000 $316,000 5/28/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $316,000 7/6/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara Town of Los Gatos Los Gatos - Blossom Hill/University Intersection Imps Signal REG090008 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5067(014) $529,000 $529,000 4/24/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $453,295 7/9/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara Town of Los Gatos Los Gatos - Prospect Area Street Rehabilitation Rehab REG090031 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5067(015) $102,000 $102,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Santa Clara City of Milpitas Milpitas - South Park Victoria Drive Resurfacing Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5314(007) $1,136,000 $1,136,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $772,000 8/4/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Monte Sereno Monte Sereno - Daves Avenue Rehabilitation Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5339(001) $94,000 $94,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $94,000 8/4/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Morgan Hill Morgan Hill - East Dunne Avenue Resurfacing Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5152(019) $556,000 $556,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $456,000 7/22/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Morgan Hill Morgan Hill - Peak Avenue and Church Street Resurfacing Rehab REG090031 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPl-5152(020) $107,000 $107,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Santa Clara City of Mountain View Mountain View - Various Arterials & Collectors Resurfacing Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5124(027) $851,000 $851,000 6/24/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $724,814 8/19/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Palo Alto - San Antonio Avenue Resurfacing Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5100(012) $505,000 $505,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $505,000 9/14/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Palo Alto - Lytton Avenue Resurfacing Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5100(011) $580,000 $580,000 6/18/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $580,000 9/14/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Alma Street Concrete Restoration Rehab REG090031 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5100(013) $209,000 $209,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Santa Clara City of San Jose San Jose - Various Streets Resurfacing and Rehabiliation Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5005(096) $12,701,000 $12,701,000 6/27/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $9,302,466 8/24/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of San Jose San Jose - Various Streets Resurfacing and Rehabilitation Rehab REG090031 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5005(099) $2,443,000 $2,443,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Santa Clara City of Santa Clara Santa Clara City - Citywide Street Resurfacing Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5019(022) $962,000 $962,000 6/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $962,000 8/3/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Santa Clara Santa Clara City - Monroe Street Traffic Signal Interconnect Signal REG090008 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5019(023) $553,000 $553,000 7/9/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $404,585 8/18/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara County of Santa Clara Santa Clara County - Montague Expressway Phase 3 Rehab Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5937(132) $3,054,000 $3,054,000 5/13/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,684,000 6/24/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara County of Santa Clara Santa Clara County - Unincorporated Roads Phase 1 Rehab Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5937(133) $889,000 $889,000 6/20/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $889,000 8/18/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Saratoga Saratoga - Saratoga Ave Overlay & Rehabilitation Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5332(014) $714,000 $714,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $714,000 9/16/2009 9/30/2009 Santa Clara City of Saratoga Saratoga - Saratoga Ave and Fruitvale Ave Overlay and Rehab Rehab REG090031 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5332(015) $137,000 $137,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Santa Clara City of Sunnyvale Sunnyvale - Wolfe Road Caltrain Overcrossing Rehabilitation Rehab REG090031 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5213(032) $2,745,000 $2,745,000 5/9/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,225,635 7/14/2009 9/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $31,550,000 $28,552,000 $2,998,000 $22,146,795

SOLANO $11,600,000 Solano City of Benicia Benicia - East 2nd Street Overlay Rehab REG090032 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5003(024) $400,000 $400,000 7/14/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $290,200 9/15/2009 9/30/2009 Solano City of Dixon Dixon - Various Streets and Roads Rehabilitation Rehab REG090032 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5056(016) $300,000 $300,000 6/6/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $300,000 8/25/2009 9/30/2009 Solano City of Dixon Dixon - Stratford Avenue Rehabilitation Rehab REG090032 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5056(017) $218,000 $218,000 9/24/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Solano City of Fairfield Fairfield - Gateway Boulevard Resurfacing Rehab REG090032 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5132(033) $900,000 $900,000 6/6/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $692,900 8/18/2009 9/30/2009 Solano City of Fairfield Fairfield - East Tabor Ave Resurfacing Rehab REG090032 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5132(034) $900,000 $900,000 6/18/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $475,400 8/18/2009 9/30/2009 Solano City of Fairfield Fairfield - Suisun Valley Road Rehabilitation Rehab REG090032 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5132(036) $538,000 $538,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Solano County of Solano Solano County - Various Streets Overlay Phase 1 Rehab REG090032 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5923(088) $2,000,000 $2,000,000 4/30/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,000,000 6/16/2009 9/30/2009 Solano County of Solano Solano County - Various Streets Overlay Phase 2 Rehab REG090032 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5923(093) $360,000 Pending - HQ $360,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Solano City of Suisun City Suisun City - Sunset Avenue Road Rehabilitation Rehab REG090032 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5032(022) $700,000 $700,000 6/6/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $700,000 8/18/2009 9/30/2009 Solano City of Suisun City Suisun City - Main Street Rehabilitation Rehab REG090032 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5032(024) $170,000 $170,000 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Solano City of Vacaville Vacaville - Peabody Road/Marshall Rd Pedestrian Safety Imps Bike/Ped REG090007 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5094(049) $260,000 $260,000 5/23/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $260,000 5/26/2009 9/30/2009 Solano City of Vacaville Vacaville - Various Streets Overlay Rehab REG090032 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5094(052) $1,376,000 $1,376,000 6/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,376,000 8/25/2009 9/30/2009 Solano City of Vacaville Vacaville - Opticom Pre-emption project Signal REG090008 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5094(053) $320,000 $320,000 6/6/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $320,000 10/8/2009 9/30/2009 Solano City of Vallejo Vallejo - Downtown Vallejo Streetscape Bike/Ped REG090007 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5030(048) $2,138,000 $2,138,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,138,000 9/22/2009 9/30/2009 Solano City of Vallejo Vallejo - Various Streets Overlay Rehab REG090032 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5030(049) $1,020,000 $1,020,000 6/24/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,020,000 9/15/2009 9/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $11,600,000 $10,532,000 $1,068,000 $9,572,500

LSRWG 120309 - Page 36 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

134 MTC - Local Streets and Roads System Preservation $145,480,410 $139,893,842 $5,586,568 122 $115,728,171 111 SONOMA $15,380,000 Sonoma City of Cloverdale Cloverdale - Various Streets Rehabilitation Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5039(021) $500,000 $500,000 6/3/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $467,400 7/22/2009 9/30/2009 Sonoma City of Cotati Cotati - Old Redwood Highway Rehabilitation - South (Seg 1) Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5383(007) $500,000 $500,000 6/5/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $500,000 9/18/2009 9/30/2009 Sonoma City of Healdsburg Healdsburg - Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5027(014) $500,000 $500,000 6/3/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $500,000 8/17/2009 9/30/2009 Sonoma City of Petaluma Petaluma - Various Streets Rehabilitation Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5022(044) $1,109,000 $1,109,000 4/25/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $614,000 7/20/2009 9/30/2009 Sonoma City of Petaluma Petaluma - McDowell Blvd North Rehabilitation Rehab REG090033 Cert #11 9/14/2009 ESPL-5022(045) $233,000 $233,000 9/24/2009 $0 11/30/2009 6/30/2010 Sonoma City of Rohnert Park Rohnert Park - Various Streets Rehabilitation Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5379(017) $869,000 $869,000 6/17/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $869,000 7/28/2009 9/30/2009 Sonoma City of Santa Rosa Santa Rosa - West College Ave and Summerfield Rd Overlay Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5028(053) $3,696,000 $3,696,000 6/3/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $3,088,142 8/11/2009 9/30/2009 Sonoma City of Sebastopol Sebastopol - Various Streets Overlays Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5123(014) $500,000 $500,000 6/6/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $500,000 9/1/2009 9/30/2009 Sonoma City of Sonoma City of Sonoma - 5th Street West Rehabilitation Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5114(014) $500,000 $500,000 6/6/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $500,000 8/19/2009 9/30/2009 Sonoma County of Sonoma Sonoma County - Roadway & Bridge Surface Preservation Program Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5920(116) $6,376,000 $6,376,000 7/2/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $6,376,000 8/31/2009 9/30/2009 Sonoma Town of Windsor Windsor - Los Amigos Road Pavement Resurfacing Rehab REG090033 Cert #1 4/10/2009 ESPL-5472(012) $597,000 $596,432 6/4/2009 $568 5/31/2009 9/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $15,380,000 $15,379,432 $568 $13,414,542

ARRA - LS&R System Preservation Total $145,480,410 $139,893,842 $5,586,568 $115,728,171

J:\PROJECT\Funding\ARRA\ARRA Obligations and Project Delivery\[MTC-SFBayArea ARRA Obligations Status 11-18-09.xls]State Discretionary

LSRWG 120309 - Page 37 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

SF Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Transit - System Preservation November 18, 2009 FTA Grant FTA Grant Contract Project 1511 Cert Total ARRA FTA Grant Executed Remaining Award Contract Award Contract Remaining Award County Implementing Agency Project Title Type TIP ID No. 1511 Cert # Date FTA Grant Number Funding Executed Amount Date Balance Deadline Amount Award Date Balance Deadline

80 MTC - Transit System Preservation $287,097,589 $276,802,655 $287,097,589 74 $242,664,657 55 $34,137,998 0 MTC - State Element ARRA - Transit Preservation $15,300,000 $5,005,066 $10,294,934

Various BART Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres SM050005 Cert #9 8/31/2009 CA-66-X004 $5,856,326 $5,856,326 11/30/2009 $0 6/30/2010 San Francisco SFMTA Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres SF090031 Cert #8 Pending CA-66-X008-00 $4,534,543 $4,534,543 9/29/2009 $0 11/30/2009 $4,534,543 6/30/2010 San Mateo Caltrain Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres SM090025 Cert #8 Pending CA-66-X011 $1,033,836 $1,033,836 11/30/2009 $0 6/30/2010 Santa Clara VTA Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres SCL990046 Cert #8 Pending CA-66-X015 $2,677,890 $2,677,890 11/30/2009 $0 6/30/2010 Solano City of Fairfield GFI Fareboxes purchase and implementation Sys Pres SOL09008 Cert #8 Pending CA-96-X088 $172,340 $172,340 11/30/2009 $0 6/30/2010 Napa NCTPA Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres NAP97AM58 Cert #8 Pending CA-66-X012 $157,658 $157,658 9/29/2009 $0 11/30/2009 $157,658 6/30/2010 Sonoma Santa Rosa CityBus Hybrid Bus Purchase Sys Pres SON070020 Cert #8 Pending CA-66-X010 $312,865 $312,865 9/28/2009 $0 11/30/2009 $312,865 6/30/2010 Solano City of Vacaville Electronic Fareboxes Sys Pres SOL991099 Cert #8 Pending CA-66-X013 $115,330 $115,330 11/30/2009 $0 6/30/2010 Solano City of Vallejo The Vallejo Station Bus Transit Center at York Street Sys Pres SOL950035 Cert #8 Pending CA-66-X014 $439,212 $439,212 11/30/2009 $0 6/30/2010 SUBTOTAL $15,300,000 $5,005,066 $10,294,934 $0 $5,005,066

MTC - Regional Element ARRA - Transit Preservation $25,738,903 AC TRANSIT Various AC Transit Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X004 $23,165,013 $23,165,013 6/25/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $23,165,013 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 Various AC Transit ADA Paratransit Operations Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X004 $2,573,890 $2,573,890 6/25/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,573,890 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $25,738,903 $25,738,903 $0 $25,738,903 $0

BART Various BART Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090023 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-56-0003 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 5/21/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $10,000,000 8/20/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various BART 480V Switchgear Replacement Sys Pres REG090023 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-56-0003 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 5/21/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $20,000,000 10/7/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various BART Pleasant Hill Crossover Project Sys Pres REG090023 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-56-0003 $13,000,000 $13,000,000 5/21/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $13,000,000 7/15/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various BART Balboa Station Walkway Safety Project Sys Pres REG090019, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X001 / CA-56-0003 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 5/21/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,000,000 7/22/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various BART Replacement of Anodes and Anode Cables on the Transbay Tube Sys Pres REG090021, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X001 / CA-56-0003 $5,184,119 $5,184,119 5/21/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $5,184,119 11/30/2009 Various BART Third Rail Coverboards Replacement Sys Pres REG090020 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X001 $4,184,120 $4,184,120 6/23/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $4,184,120 10/22/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various BART Capacity Interior Reconfiguration for 105 cars Sys Pres REG090020 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X001 $1,050,000 $1,050,000 6/23/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,050,000 7/23/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various BART Floor and Seat Cushion Replacement for 50 cars Sys Pres REG090019, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X001 / CA-56-0003 $2,550,000 $2,550,000 5/21/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,550,000 8/27/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various BART Replacement of Auxilliary Power Supply Equipment (APSE) on 30 C-1 cars Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X001 $4,800,000 $4,800,000 6/23/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $4,800,000 11/30/2009 Various BART Between-Car Barriers Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X001 $2,300,000 $2,300,000 6/23/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,300,000 8/27/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various BART Project Development for Concord Shop Wheel Truing Machine Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X001 $300,000 $300,000 6/23/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $300,000 8/15/2009 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $65,368,239 $65,368,239 $0 $55,384,120 $9,984,119 CALTRAIN Various Caltrain Track and Infrastructure Rehabilitation Sys Pres REG090011, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X022 / CA-56-006 $7,309,632 $7,309,632 6/19/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $7,309,632 7/1/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various Caltrain Replacement of Operations Control Center System Sys Pres REG090011 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X022 $2,900,000 $2,900,000 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,900,000 11/30/2009 Various Caltrain Bike Racks Sys Pres REG090011 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X022 $200,000 $200,000 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $200,000 3/20/2009 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $10,409,632 $10,409,632 $0 $7,509,632 $2,900,000

GGBHTD Various GGBHTD Refurbish One Ferry Boat Sys Pres REG090019, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X028 $8,566,469 $8,566,469 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $8,566,469 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $8,566,469 $8,566,469 $0 $0 $8,566,469 MCTD Various MCTD Automated Vehicle Location System Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X028 $250,000 $250,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $250,000 10/19/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various MCTD Mobile Data Terminals for Paratransit Fleet Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X028 $360,000 $360,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $360,000 8/17/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Various MCTD Data Management System Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X028 $250,000 $250,000 6/16/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $250,000 9/21/2009 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $860,000 $860,000 $0 $860,000 $0 SFMTA San Francisco SFMTA LRV Doors and Steps Reconditioning Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $9,000,000 $9,000,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $9,000,000 10/20/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Motor Coach Component Life-Cycle Rehabilitation Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $15,355,979 $15,355,979 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $15,355,979 8/11/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Operating Assistance Sys Pres CA-96-X014 $6,700,000 $6,700,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $6,700,000 10/1/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Central Control & Communications Interim Line Management Center Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $400,000 $400,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $400,000 8/18/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA ATCS Inductive Loop Cable In The Muni Metro Subway Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,000,000 9/29/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Capital Planning and Grant Management Application Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $250,000 $250,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $250,000 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Bus Yard Workstation Station Replacement Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $100,000 $100,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $100,000 6/26/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Cable Car Kiosks Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $350,000 $350,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $350,000 10/20/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Change Machines Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $40,000 $40,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $40,000 9/23/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Miscellaneous Preventive Maintenance of Track Switches Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,000,000 9/10/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Replace Fare Collection Equipment Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $11,000,000 8/31/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Infrastructure & Facility Enhancement and Maintenance Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $4,050,001 $4,050,001 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $4,050,001 7/13/2009 $0 11/30/2009 San Francisco SFMTA Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X014 $18,000,000 $18,000,000 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $18,000,000 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $67,245,980 $67,245,980 $0 $66,995,980 $250,000 SAMTRANS San Mateo SamTrans Replacement of up to 132 buses Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X021 $3,090,442 $3,090,442 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $3,090,442 10/16/2008 $0 11/30/2009 San Mateo SamTrans Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X021 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $4,000,000 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 San Mateo SamTrans ADA Paratransit Set-Aside Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X021 $787,827 $787,827 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $787,827 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $7,878,269 $7,878,269 $0 $7,878,269 $0 VTA Santa Clara VTA 107 Hybrid 40’ Bus Replacements Sys Pres REG090011, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X029 $42,402,372 $42,402,372 7/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $42,402,372 8/6/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Santa Clara VTA Bus Stop Enhancements Sys Pres REG090011 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X029 $351,844 $351,844 7/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $351,844 8/7/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Santa Clara VTA Operating Assistance Sys Pres REG090011, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X029 $4,750,468 $4,750,468 6/15/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $4,750,468 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $47,504,684 $47,504,684 $0 $47,504,684 $0

ACE Various ACE Midlife Overhaul of 5 ACE locomotives Sys Pres REG090024 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-56-002 $2,954,552 $2,954,552 6/10/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,954,552 6/26/2009 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $2,954,552 $2,954,552 $0 $2,954,552 $0

LSRWG 120309 - Page 38 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

80 MTC - Transit System Preservation $287,097,589 $276,802,655 $287,097,589 74 $242,664,657 55 $34,137,998 0 CCCTA Contra Costa CCCTA Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090020 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X036 $4,265,594 $4,265,594 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $4,265,594 7/1/2009 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $4,265,594 $4,265,594 $0 $4,265,594 $0

ECCTA Contra Costa ECCTA Preventive Maintenance FY09/10 Sys Pres REG090021 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X055 $2,811,232 $2,811,232 8/5/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,811,232 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 Contra Costa ECCTA Replace Support Vehicles w/Hybrids Sys Pres REG090021 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X055 $252,000 $252,000 8/5/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $252,000 11/30/2009 Contra Costa ECCTA IT Structure - Replace all Office Hardware & Software Sys Pres REG090021 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X055 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 8/5/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,000,000 10/30/2009 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $4,063,232 $4,063,232 $0 $3,811,232 $252,000

FAIRFIELD Solano City of Fairfield FAST Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090018 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X023 $826,080 $826,080 6/25/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $826,080 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 Solano City of Fairfield Bus Purchase/replacements (3) Sys Pres REG090018 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X023 $417,747 $417,747 6/25/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $417,747 11/30/2009 Solano City of Fairfield GFI Fareboxes/counters for transit vehicles Sys Pres REG090018 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X023 $1,577,660 $1,577,660 6/25/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,577,660 11/30/2009 Solano City of Fairfield Operating Assistance Sys Pres CA-96-X023 $313,498 $313,498 6/25/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $313,498 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $3,134,985 $3,134,985 $0 $1,139,578 $1,995,407

LAVTA Alameda LAVTA Rehabilitation Projects Sys Pres REG090017 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X024 $1,023,000 $1,023,000 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,023,000 4/6/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Alameda LAVTA Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090017, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X024 $1,678,997 $1,678,997 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,678,997 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 Alameda LAVTA ADA Paratransit Sys Pres REG090020 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X024 $300,222 $300,222 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $300,222 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $3,002,219 $3,002,219 $0 $3,002,219 $0

NCTPA Napa NCTPA VINE Capital Rolling Stock Sys Pres REG090013, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X069 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 8/4/2009 $1,959,971 5/31/2009 $2,000,000 9/16/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Napa NCTPA Trancas/29 Park & Ride Lot - Napa Sys Pres REG090016 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X069 $779,727 $779,727 8/4/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $779,727 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $2,779,727 $2,779,727 $1,959,971 $2,000,000 $779,727

SANTA ROSA CITY BUS Sonoma Santa Rosa City Bus Operating Assistance Sys Pres REG090012 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X035 $200,851 $624,418 7/13/2009 ($423,567) 5/31/2009 $624,418 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 Sonoma Santa Rosa City Bus ADA Paratransit Operations Sys Pres REG090012 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X035 $428,913 $428,913 7/13/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $428,913 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 Sonoma Santa Rosa City Bus Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090012 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X035 $3,596,927 $3,173,360 7/13/2009 $423,567 5/31/2009 $3,173,360 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 Sonoma Santa Rosa City Bus Transit Enhancements Sys Pres REG090012 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X035 $62,442 $62,442 7/13/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $62,442 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $4,289,133 $4,289,133 $0 $4,226,691 $62,442

SONOMA COUNTY TRANSIT Sonoma Sonoma County Transit Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090012 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X031 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 5/27/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,350,000 7/1/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Sonoma Sonoma County Transit CNG Bus Purchase Sys Pres REG090012 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X031 $605,044 $605,044 5/27/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $605,044 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $1,955,044 $1,955,044 $0 $1,350,000 $605,044

UNION CITY Alameda Union City Replacement Buses (2) Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X048 $297,060 $297,060 6/22/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $297,060 6/30/2009 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $297,060 $297,060 $0 $297,060 $0

VACAVILLE Solano City of Vacaville Fixed Route bus replacement Sys Pres REG090015 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X002 $1,734,372 $1,734,372 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $1,734,372 3/31/2009 $0 11/30/2009 Solano City of Vacaville Vacaville Intermodal Station Sys Pres REG090015 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X002 $482,702 $482,702 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $482,702 11/11/2009 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $2,217,074 $2,217,074 $0 $2,217,074 $0 VALLEJO Solano City of Vallejo Rehab/Preventative Maintenance Sys Pres REG090016, Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X034 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 6/22/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $4,000,000 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 Solano City of Vallejo Ferry Terminal ADA, Rehab Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X034 $800,000 $800,000 6/22/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $800,000 11/30/2009 Solano City of Vallejo Bus Maintenance Facility Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X034 $812,324 $812,324 6/22/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $812,324 11/30/2009 Solano City of Vallejo Repower Ferry Engines Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X034 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 6/22/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $2,000,000 11/30/2009 Solano City of Vallejo Operating Assistance Sys Pres CA-96-X034 $761,232 $761,232 7/13/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $761,232 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $8,373,556 $8,373,556 $0 $4,761,232 $3,612,324

BENICIA Solano City of Benicia Fueling Station Upgrade Sys Pres REG090016 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X068 $57,000 $57,000 7/17/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $57,000 11/30/2009 Solano City of Benicia Replace 12 Bus Shelters Sys Pres REG090016 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X068 $68,400 $68,400 7/17/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $68,400 11/30/2009 Solano City of Benicia Operating Assistance Sys Pres CA-96-X068 $6,600 $6,600 7/13/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $6,600 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $132,000 $132,000 $0 $6,600 $125,400

WESTCAT Contra Costa WestCat Preventive Maintenance Sys Pres REG090019 Cert #4 4/28/2009 CA-96-X067 $761,237 $761,237 6/11/2009 $0 5/31/2009 $761,237 10/1/2008 $0 11/30/2009 SUBTOTAL $761,237 $761,237 $0 $761,237 $0

MTC - Regional Element ARRA - Transit SystemPreservation - Total $271,797,589 $271,797,589 $1,959,971 $242,664,657 $29,132,932

MTC - ARRA - Transit System Preservation TOTAL $287,097,589 $276,802,655 $12,254,905 $242,664,657 $34,137,998 J:\PROJECT\Funding\ARRA\ARRA Obligations and Project Delivery\[MTC-SFBayArea ARRA Obligations Status 11-18-09.xls]State Discretionary

LSRWG 120309 - Page 39 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

SF Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Transit - Train to Plane November 18, 2009 FTA Grant FTA Grant Contract Project 1511 Cert Total ARRA FTA Grant Executed Remaining Award Contract Award Contract Award County Implementing Agency Project Title Type TIP ID No. 1511 Cert # Date FTA Grant Number Funding Executed Amount Date Balance Deadline Amount Award Date Deadline

1 MTC Transit - Train to Plane $70,000,000 $0 $70,000,000 0$000 Transit - Train to Plane $70,000,000

Alameda BART Oakland Airport Connector (OAC) Train to Plane BRT990002 None None CA-96-X087 $70,000,000 $70,000,000 11/30/2009 12/31/2009 SUBTOTAL $70,000,000 $0 $70,000,000 $0

MTC - ARRA - Transit - Transit - Train to Plane TOTAL $70,000,000 $0 $70,000,000 $0

J:\PROJECT\Funding\ARRA\ARRA Obligations and Project Delivery\[MTC-SFBayArea ARRA Obligations Status 11-18-09.xls]State Discretionary

LSRWG 120309 - Page 40 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

SF Bay Area Caltrans American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) State Discretionary Funded Highway Projects November 18, 2009 Anticipated Contract Award + Anticipated Contract Project Total ARRA Obligation Remaining Obligation Contingencies + Contract Award County Implementing Agency Project Title Type TIP ID No. 1511 Cert # 1511 Cert Date Federal Project ID Funding Obligation Amount Date Balance Deadline Support Award Date Deadline

12 State - Discretionary Projects $224,319,234 $157,510,876 $75,451,423 11 $135,403,900 10 Caltrans State ARRA - Prop 1B Backfill $92,700,000

1 ALA/CC Caltrans Caltrans - Alameda/Contra Costa SR-24 - Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore Prop 1B CC-010002 4/28/2009 4/28/2009 SARRA-P024(030) $92,700,000 $92,700,000 5/2/2009 $0 3/2/2010 $92,700,000 11/10/2009 8/29/2010 SUBTOTAL $92,700,000 $92,700,000 $0 $92,700,000

Caltrans State ARRA - SHOPP, Hwy Maintenance $127,026,234

1 San Francisco Caltrans Caltrans - San Francisco US 101 - Doyle Drive Replacement SHOPP SF-991030 3/16/2009 3/16/2009 $50,000,000 $50,000,000 3/2/2010 8/29/2010 2 Alameda Caltrans Caltrans - Alameda I-880 in Oakland - Rehabilitate Fruitvale Ave Bridge Deck SHOPP ALA090029 3/16/2009 3/16/2009 SARRA-8801(058) $12,629,000 $9,400,494 3/31/2009 $3,216,981 6/30/2009 $8,150,000 6/15/2009 12/27/2009 3 Solano Caltrans Caltrans - Solano I-80 in Fairfield - Rehabilitate Roadway SHOPP SOL050031 3/16/2009 3/16/2009 SARRA-0802(356) $21,348,234 $27,721,900 3/20/2009 $1,778,100 6/30/2009 $16,470,000 4/21/2009 12/27/2009 4 Santa Clara Caltrans Caltrans - Santa Clara I-280 in San Jose - Rehabilitate Roadway SHOPP SCL090033 3/16/2009 3/16/2009 SARRA-2801(119) $33,019,000 $15,008,682 4/9/2009 $18,010,318 6/30/2009 $9,599,000 6/19/2009 12/27/2009 5 San Mateo Caltrans Caltrans - San Mateo County: Install TMS Elements SHOPP SM-090023 5/8/2009 5/8/2009 SARRA-2801(122) $2,880,000 $2,495,500 7/2/2009 $1,065,927 6/30/2009 $1,431,500 9/9/2009 12/27/2009 6 Napa Caltrans Caltrans - Napa SR 29 near Calistoga - Hwy Maintenance Hwy Maint REG090034 4/10/2009 4/10/2009 SARRA-P029(105) $660,000 $690,000 5/2/2009 ($30,000) 6/30/2009 $584,100 6/29/2009 12/27/2009 7 Sonoma Caltrans Caltrans - Sonoma SR 1 near Fort Ross & Gualala - Hwy Maintenance Hwy Maint REG090034 4/10/2009 4/10/2009 SARRA-P001(540) $550,000 $575,000 5/2/2009 $25,831 6/30/2009 $446,800 7/20/2009 12/27/2009 7 San Mateo Caltrans Caltrans - San Mateo US 101 near South San Francisco - Hwy Maintenance Hwy Maint REG090034 4/10/2009 4/10/2009 SARRA-Q101(152) $4,400,000 $2,716,300 5/2/2009 $1,265,488 6/30/2009 $2,715,000 7/20/2009 12/27/2009 8 Santa Clara Caltrans Caltrans - Santa Clara SR 35 near Los Gatos - Hwy Maintenance Hwy Maint REG090034 4/10/2009 4/10/2009 SARRA-S035(007) $1,540,000 $1,610,000 5/1/2009 $118,778 6/30/2009 $1,207,500 7/16/2009 12/27/2009 SUBTOTAL $127,026,234 $60,217,876 $75,451,423 $40,603,900

Caltrans State TE ARRA - Transportation Enhancement (TE) $4,593,000

1 Marin Caltrans Caltrans - Marin US 101 HOV Gap Closure - Bike Path TE-Bike/Ped MRN990001 4/20/2009 4/20/2009 SARRA-Q101(155) $2,100,000 $2,100,000 5/21/2009 $0 3/2/2010 $2,100,000 8/15/2007 8/29/2010 2 San Mateo Belmont Belmont - US 101 Bike Bridge Overcrossing TE-Bike/Ped SM-070005 Cert #6 7/17/2009 ESPLEHP-5268(016) $2,493,000 $2,493,000 9/9/2009 $0 3/2/2010 8/29/2010 SUBTOTAL $4,593,000 $4,593,000 $0 $2,100,000

State Caltrans ARRA - TOTAL $224,319,234 $157,510,876 $75,451,423 $135,403,900 J:\PROJECT\Funding\ARRA\ARRA Obligations and Project Delivery\[MTC-SFBayArea ARRA Obligations Status 11-18-09.xls]State Discretionary

LSRWG 120309 - Page 41 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

From: Denix D Anbiah Date: 11/24/09 4:44 PM Subject: Fwd: [CalRTPA] ARRA delivery Attachments: Recovery Funding-MASTER OA plan .xls; ARRA Project with Award Dates 11-17- 09 A.xls; ARRA Project PSAs Not back from local agency 11-23-09.xls

>>> Denix D Anbiah 11/24/2009 4:18 PM >>>

I am sure most of you have seen the LAO report that was released yesterday that said "local road agencies have been slower to use their obligated ARRA transportation funds, with contracts for only one–third of their funds out to bid". I believe more projects have been out to bid and awarded and funds are expended, but not yet reported. We appreciate any assistance you can provide with the following 3 action items. Thank you.

1. See attached file: Recovery Funding-MASTER OA plan .xls)

The document above is the obligation plan submitted by all the RTPAs. Please make sure the local agencies submit the E76 for all the projects in this list, to the DLAE by December 15, 2009. We still have about $250 million for which we need to receive the E76 by Dec 15. If the E76 cannot be submitted to the DLAEs timely, contact the DLAEs immediately to discuss options.

2. (See attached file: ARRA Project with Award Dates 11-17-09 A.xls)

The document above is the list of ARRA projects previously obligated for construction. The last 2 columns are the award information (date and amount) reported by the local agency through the on-line data input system (LA-ODIS). The previous 2 columns are from the hard copy documents submitted by the local agencies. They are supposed to be the same. But as you can see, in most cases, they are not the same. The local agencies need to report the award information through LAODIS timely and accurately, because this information gets captured and reported to FHWA way before we get the hard copy.

Also the above document shows the expenditure information. If a project is awarded back in July or August, I would expect to see some expenditures by now (unless the project is suspended for the winter, etc.). The column titled "FMIS EXPEND AMT" is the expenditure we have reported to FHWA. As you can see some projects awarded as early as July still has no expenditure. Please encourage the local agencies to submit the invoices timely.

3. (See attached file: ARRA Project PSAs Not back from local agency 11-23-09.xls)

The above document shows the list of Program Supplement Agreements (PSAs) sent to the local agencies but not received back. Execution of the PSA is required before invoices can be paid. Please encourage the local agencies to send these PSAs back to us as soon as possible. If they cannot find the original (lost in the mail), they can contact us and we could send them new ones.

Denix Anbiah, Chief Division of Local Assistance Department of Transportation 916-653-1776 (phone) 916-799-3092 (cell)

LSRWG 120309 - Page 42 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1 Attachment Recovery Fund Obligation Plan

Due: November 1, 2008

Alameda ESPL-6273(056) Alameda County ACCMA - I-580 EB HOT Lane CT-HQ $7,500,000 7,500,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of ALA County CMA 11/30/2009 Caltrans ARRAL-P024(031) Oakland Caltrans - SR-24 Realignment of WB SR CT $97,000 97,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of ALA 25 to NB SR 13 11/30/2009 Caltrans ARRAL-P024(032) Oakland Caltrans - SR-24 Kay Street Widening and CT $67,000 67,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of ALA Signalization 11/30/2009 City of ESPL-5014(033) Alameda City Alameda City - Certain Streets CT-HQ $350,000 350,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of ALA Alameda Rehabilitation 11/30/2009 City of ESPL-5053(020) Livermore Livermore - Various Arterial Street CT-HQ $350,000 350,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of ALA Livermore Resurfacing 11/30/2009 City of ESPL-5012(101) Oakland Oakland - Various Streets and Roads $1,255,000 1,255,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of ALA Oakland Preventive Maintenance 11/30/2009 City of ESPL-5010(023) Pleasanton Pleasanton - Bernal Avenue Pavement CT-HQ $370,000 370,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of ALA Pleasanton Rehabilitation 11/30/2009 County of ESPL-5933(101) Alameda County Alameda County - Various San Lorenzo/ $420,000 420,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of ALA Alameda Ashland Roadways Rehab 11/30/2009 County of ESPL-5928(093) Contra Costa Contra Costa County - Vasco Road Safety CT-HQ $10,000,000 Demo 10,000,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of CC Contra County Imps 11/30/2009 Costa County of ESLP-5921(048) Napa County Napa County - Silverado Trail Phase C CT-HQ $380,000 380,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of NAP Napa Rehabilitation 11/30/2009 Yountville ESPL-5395(001) Yountville Yountville - SR 29 Bicycle Safety $1,000,000 1,000,000 Yes Yes Regional Obligation Deadline NAP Improvements Extended to 12/31/09 Caltrans ARRAL-2801(123) Santa Clara Caltrans - FPI, Santa Clara NB I-280: W CT $4,480,000 4,480,000 Yes Yes Regional Obligation Deadline SCL of US 101 to E of I-880 (CON) Extended to 12/31/09 Caltrans ARRAL-2801(124) Santa Clara Caltrans - FPI, Santa Clara SB I-280: W of CT $6,350,000 6,350,000 Yes Yes Regional Obligation Deadline SCL US 101 to E of I-880(CON) Extended to 12/31/09 City of Morgan Hill Morgan Hill - Peak Avenue and Church $107,000 107,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SCL Morgan Hill Street Resurfacing 11/30/2009 City of Palo Palo Alto Palo Alto - Alma Street Concrete $209,000 209,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SCL Alto Restoration 11/30/2009 City of San San Jose San Jose - Various Streets Resurfacing $2,443,000 2,443,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SCL Jose and Rehabilitation 11/30/2009 City of Saratoga Saratoga - Saratoga Ave and Fruitvale $137,000 137,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SCL Saratoga Ave Overlay and Rehab 11/30/2009 Santa Clara Santa Clara Santa Clara VTA - SR 85 Express HOT $3,300,000 3,300,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SCL VTA Lanes 11/30/2009 Town of Los Los Gatos Los Gatos - Prospect Area Street $102,000 102,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SCL Gatos Rehabilitation 11/30/2009 San ESPLE-6328(029) San Francisco San Francisco - Pedestrian Signal $589,295 589,295 Yes Yes Regional Obligation Deadline SF Francisco Upgrade Extended to 12/31/09 MTA Caltrans ARRAL-2801(125) San Mateo Caltrans - FPI, San Mateo I-280: I-380 to CT $6,317,500 6,317,500 Yes Yes Regional Obligation Deadline SM SR 1 (CON) Extended to 12/31/09 City of ESPLEHP- Belmont Belmont - US 101 Bike Bridge CCAG $147,806 State ARRA 147,806 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SM Belmont 5268(004) Overcrossing 11/30/2009 City of Fairfield Fairfield - Suisun Valley Road $538,000 538,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SOL Fairfield Rehabilitation 11/30/2009 City of Suisun Suisun City - Main Street Rehabilitation $170,000 170,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SOL Suisun City 11/30/2009 County of ESPL-5923(093) Solano County Solano County - Various Streets Overlay CT-HQ $360,000 360,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SOL Solano Phase 2 11/30/2009 City of Santa ESPL-5028(054) Santa Rosa Santa Rosa - Mendocino Avenue ITS CT-HQ $1,000,000 1,000,000 Yes Yes MTC Regional Oblig Deadline of SON Rosa Improvements 11/30/2009 # of Projects 26 Total for MTC Total $ 48,039,601

11/30/2009 (Please do not change, alter or modify this template)

LSRWG 120309 - Page 43 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1 Attachment Recovery Fund Obligation Plan

Due: November 1, 2008

Local Project Number Project Location Project Scope / Description Planned Date Federal Fund Type FTIP Amendment 1511 Certification Remarks (enter as: STP 1234(567); Provide location of project- Provide a brief discription and scope of project for Submitting Other If no, when Agency Amendment has Cerfitication has If no, when expect if not known please provide street name, highway, cross- of RFA (E-76) Funding/Source expect to the project FTIP or PPNO street, etc. ARRA $ Total Obligation $ been done (yes been completed to complete Enter any comments or additional information and (MM/DD/YY) Type (CMAQ, RSTP, complete? number) or no) (yes or no) (MM/DD/YY) provide a contact, with a name & phone number, for HBP, etc) (MM/DD/YY) questions

I-80 SFOBB Yerba I-80 SFOBB Yerba Buena Island Caltrans TIP ID SF-070027 1/30/2010 $200,000,000$ 200,000,000 Yes No 12/15/2010 Amount is scalable. SF Buena Island Transition Structure US 101 - San US 101 Doyle Drive Replacement - Already has State ARRA funds. Caltrans TIP ID SF-991030 Francsico Doyle 1/1/2010 $7,000,000 $ 7,000,000 Yes Yes SF Contract 1.5 - Environmental Mitigation Contract 1.5. Amount is Scalable Drive US 101 - San US 101 Doyle Drive Replacement - Already has State ARRA funds. Caltrans TIP ID SF-991030 Francsico Doyle Contract 4 - SB Battery Tunnel, at Grade 1/1/2010 $50,000,000 $ 50,000,000 Yes Yes Contract 4. Amount is Scalable from SF Drive Detour $1M to $100M $257,000,000

City of Osgood Road Osgood Road between Washington 12/15/2009 12/15/2010 Fremont ESPL-5322() Rehabilitation Boulevard and South Grimmer Blvd. $770,000 $ 770,000 No 11/12/2009 No ALA Oakland - Various Streets 12/15/2009 12/15/2010 City of Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation of approximately additional Oakland ESPL-5012() Phase 2 Federal-aid eligible street segments $991,725 $ 991,725 No 11/12/2009 No ALA Santa Rita Road City of Pavement Resurfacing of Santa Rita Road from 12/15/2009 12/15/2010 Pleasanton ESPL-5101() Rehabilitation Valley Avenue to Jensen Street $386,289 $ 386,289 No 11/12/2009 No ALA Bancroft Avenue City of San Street Reconstruct street surface of Bancroft 12/15/2009 12/15/2010 Leandro ESPL-5041() Rehabilitation Avenue from 138th Ave to 148th Ave $206,979 $ 206,979 No 11/12/2009 No ALA San Miguel County of Sidewalk Sidewalk improvements along in 12/15/2009 12/15/2010 Alameda ESPL-5933() Improvements Unincorporated Alameda County $711,097 $ 711,097 No 11/12/2009 No ALA City of Walnut Creek REG090026 City of Walnut Creek Walnut Creek - Ygnacio Valley Rd Pike/Ped Trail 12/15/2009 436864 $ 436,864 No 11/12/2009 No 12/15/2010 CC Camino Contra Tassajara/Crow Camino Tassajara/Crow Canyon Road 12/15/2009 12/15/2010 CC Costa REG090026 Canyon Road Pavement Rehabilitation $110,665 $ 110,665 No 11/12/2009 No County of Contra Costa ESPLDEMO-5928(09 County of Contra Costa Contra Costa County - Vasco Road Safety Imps 12/15/2009 1179083 $ 1,179,083 No 11/12/2009 No 12/15/2010 CC Danville - Camino Tassajara/Crow Canyon Road Rehab Town of Danville REG090026 Town of Danville 12/15/2009 110665 $ 110,665 No 11/12/2009 No 12/15/2010 CC County of Marin - 2009 Pavement Rehab County of MaTIP ID REG090027 County of Marin 11/30/2009 $1,500,000 No No 12/15/2010 MRN Program - Phase "C" Resurfacing $ 1,500,000 11/12/2009 Town of Sir Francis Drake Sir Francis Drake - Town Limits to Town ESPL-5277(024) 12/15/2009 $226,436 No No 12/15/2010 MRN Ross Blvd Resurfacing Limits $ 226,436 11/12/2009 County of Napa County of Silverado Trail Phase D - Larkmead Ln to REG090028 Silverado Trail 12/15/2009 $414,908 No No 12/15/2010 NAP Napa Bale Ln Phase D Rehab $ 414,908 11/12/2009 E Campbell Ave City of East Campbell Ave from Railroad Ave to STPLE-5306(013) Downtown 11/30/2009 $100,000 No No 12/15/2010 SCL Campbell Union Ave Enhancements $ 100,000 11/12/2009 City of Abbott Avenue Abbott Avenue between San Andreas REG090031 12/15/2009 $1,040,816 No No 12/15/2010 Milpitas Resurfacing Drive and Valley Way $ 1,040,816 11/12/2009 SCL

11/30/2009 (Please do not change, alter or modify this template)

LSRWG 120309 - Page 44 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1 Attachment Recovery Fund Obligation Plan

Due: November 1, 2008

Please include any back up projects that will be using any potential ARRA Redistribution funding Local Project Number Project Location Project Scope / Description Planned Date Federal Fund Type FTIP Amendment 1511 Certification Remarks (enter as: STP 1234(567); Provide location of project- Provide a brief discription and scope of project for Submitting Other If no, when if not known please provide street name, highway, cross- of RFA (E-76) Amendment has Cerfitication has If no, when expect the project FTIP or PPNO street, etc. Funding/Source expect to Agency (MM/DD/YY) ARRA $ Total Obligation $ been done (yes been completed to complete number) Type (CMAQ, RSTP, complete? Enter any comments or additional information and (yes or no) (MM/DD/YY) HBP, etc) or no) (MM/DD/YY) provide a contact, with a name & phone number, for questions Church Street City of Roadway Resurfacing of Church Street REG090031 (Dunne to San 12/15/2009 $207,000 No No 12/15/2010 Morgan Hill (Dunne to San Pedro) Pedro) $ 207,000 11/12/2009 SCL City of San San Jose - Various San Jose Various Streets Resurfacing & REG090031 12/15/2009 $5,841,534 No No 12/15/2010 SCL Jose Streets Rehabilitation Project $ 5,841,534 11/12/2009 City of Santa Clara City of Santa Citywide street pavement repair and ESPL-5019(022) Citywide Street 12/31/2009 $1,110,415 No No 12/15/2010 SCL Clara sealing: Resurfacing $ 1,110,415 11/12/2009 Homestead Rd City of Homestead Rd between De Anza Blvd and REG090031 Asphalt Overlay, 12/15/2009 $869,365 No No 12/15/2010 SCL Sunnyvale Wolfe Rd Phase II $ 869,365 11/12/2009 Sunnyvale Ave, City of Sunnyvale Ave; Evelyn Ave and Fair Oaks REG090031 Evelyn Ave and 12/15/2009 $650,000 No No 12/15/2010 SCL Sunnyvale Ave Resurfacing Maria Lane $ 650,000 11/12/2009 County County of County Unincorporated Roads Pavement ESPL-5014(033) Unincorporated 12/15/2009 $959,000 No No 12/15/2010 SCL Santa Clara Rehabilitation Phase 1 Areas $ 959,000 11/12/2009 Central Expressway County of Central Expressway from Fair Oaks to REG090031 Auxillary Lanes 12/15/2009 $300,000 No No 12/15/2010 SCL Santa Clara Mathilda (scl070049) $ 300,000 11/12/2009 Town of Los Prospect Street REG090031 Prospect Road 12/15/2009 $177,705 No No 12/15/2010 SCL Gatos Rehabilitation $ 177,705 11/12/2009 San Bush Street Francisco Pavement 12/15/2010 DPW ESPL-5934(152) Renovation Bush Street Pavement Renovation 11/30/2009 $2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 No 11/12/2009 No SF San Francisco Various Locations 12/15/2010 DPW REG090029 Curb Ramps Various Locations 11/30/2009 $1,075,000 $ 1,075,000 No 11/12/2009 No SF San Williams Avenue Williams Avenue from 3rd Street to Francisco REG090029 Pavement 11/30/2009 $1,500,000 No No 12/15/2010 Phelps Street. DPW Renovation $ 1,500,000 11/12/2009 SF San Various Locations Francisco REG090029 Various locations 11/30/2009 $651,921 No No 12/15/2010 Curb Ramps #2 DPW $ 651,921 11/12/2009 SF Street Resurfacing Daly City REG090030 Crocker Ave and Carter St 12/31/2009 $318,000 No No 12/15/2010 SM 2010 (Phase I) $ 318,000 11/12/2009 2009 Pedestrian Various streets within the City of San San Carlos ESPL-5267(013) Improvement 12/15/2009 $295,000 No No 12/15/2010 SM Carlos Project $ 295,000 11/12/2009 Campus Dr. - San Mateo REG090030 Pavement Rehabilitation 11/30/2009 $452,500 No No 12/15/2010 SM Various Locations $ 452,500 11/12/2009 Grand Avenue and South San South San Francsico FY 2009-10 Various REG090030 Utah Avenue 12/15/2009 $327,800 No No 12/15/2010 SM Francisco Streets Resurfacing Resurfacing $ 327,800 11/12/2009 Sacramento St , Sacramento Street Virgina Street and Vallejo ESPL-5030(048) Virgina St, Marin St 12/15/2009 $2,207,700 No No 12/15/2010 SOL Marin Street Rehabilitation Rehab $ 2,207,700 11/12/2009 City of McDowell Bl. North McDowell Bl. North from Lynch Creek Dr. REG090033 12/15/2009 $728,000 No No 12/15/2010 SON Petaluma Rehabilitation to Dynamic Street. $ 728,000 11/12/2009 City of Sebastopol ESPL-5123(014) Sebastopol Overlays 2009 12/15/2009 $575,000 No No 12/15/2010 SON Sebastopol Overlays 2009 $ 575,000 11/12/2009 # of Projects 36 Total for MTC Total $285,431,467

11/30/2009 (Please do not change, alter or modify this template)

LSRWG 120309 - Page 45 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

Award Status of Local Agency ARRA Funded Projects as of 11/17/09

CONST_OBLG FEDERAL ARRA FMIS EXPEND LP2000 Award LP20000 Award LA-ODIS Award LA-ODIS Award PROJ NO EA Agency Name DESCRIPTION DT TOTAL COST FUNDS AMT Date Amount Date Amount IN ALAMEDA: CENTRAL AV:WEBSTER ST-PACIFIC AV, ROAD 5014(032) 04925418L Alameda WAY REHABILITATION 6/23/2009 1,703,874.00 1,304,000.00 0 7/21/2009 1,247,039.00 8-Sep-09 250,000.00 REDWOOD RD.-CASTRO VALLEY BL TO CAMINO ALTA M, 5933(098) 04925419L Alameda County PAVEMENTS REHAB AND CONST.ADA RAMP. 6/16/2009 2,200,000.00 2,200,000.00 0 9/15/2009 1,399,967.70 3-Aug-09 493,000.00 ALTAMONT PASS ROAD- GRANT LN TO LANDFILL ENTR, 5933(099) 04925420L Alameda County PAVEMENTS REHAB AND SHOULDER BACK. 6/23/2009 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 0 9/15/2009 1,311,937.00 8-Sep-09 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN CANYON RD WEST:JAMES DR - CHAUCER LN, 5470(007) 04925409L American Canyon REHABILITATION 8/25/2009 320,000.00 320,000.00 0 5038(021) 04925459L Antioch HILLCREST AVE., PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 6/5/2009 2,800,000.00 1,605,000.00 0 25-Aug-09 3,050,000.00

5261(006) 04925486L Atherton ATHERTON AVENUE FROM STERN TO ELENA, AC OVERLAY 6/1/2009 641,574.00 468,000.00 0 7/15/2009 429,291.00 1-Feb-10 650,000.00 OVERCROSS SR101 NORTH RALSTON EXIT, PEDESTRIAN 5268(004) 04923566L Belmont OVERCROSSING 8/21/2009 1,952,194.00 1,952,194.00 0 1)SIXTH: O'NEILL TO HARBOR, 2)CARLMONT: HASTI, AC 5268(015) 04925444L Belmont OVERLAY 6/11/2009 502,809.00 464,000.00 0 8/14/2009 420,743.42 28-Jul-09 1,070,000.00 OVERCROSS SR101 NORTH RALSTON EXIT, PEDESTRIAN 5268(016) 040A8608L Belmont OVERCROSSING 8/14/2009 2,493,000.00 2,493,000.00 0 ROUTE 780 AT STATE PARK RD O.C., WIDEN OC FOR CLASS 1 5003(023) 043A4308L Benicia BIKE PATH 7/1/2009 538,907.00 320,000.00 0 10/20/2009 1,812,135.00 E. 2ND ST. FROM LAKE HERMAN RD. TO WANGER ST, A C 5003(024) 04925461L Benicia OVERLAY 7/13/2009 401,000.00 400,000.00 0 UNIVERSITY AVE.-SAN PABLO AV. TO SACRAMENTO S, 5057(032) 04925421L Berkeley ROADWAY REHABILITATION 4/29/2009 1,619,000.00 1,619,000.00 0 9/17/2009 1,750,550.00 14-Sep-09 2,000,000.00 UNIVERSITY AVE: SACRAMENTO ST - MCGEE AVE., PAVEMENT 5057(033) 04925587L Berkeley REHAB 9/18/2009 745,898.00 400,000.00 0 5300(008) 04925460L Brentwood BALFOUR ROAD, ROAD OVERLAY 6/1/2009 1,123,000.00 1,074,000.00 0 7/28/2009 978,987.00 1-Sep-09 761,000.00 BAYSHORE BLVD-NORTHERN TO SOUTHERN CITY LIMIT, AC 5376(008) 04925430L Brisbane OVERLAY 5/27/2009 131,000.00 131,000.00 0 7/6/2009 100,031.50 18-Aug-09 10,402,000.00 AIRPORT BLVD:ANZA-411 AIRPORT AND TROUSDALE:T, AC 5171(016) 04925487L Burlingame OVERLAY 5/12/2009 800,855.00 551,000.00 0 7/20/2009 660,731.00 15-Sep-09 500,000.00 EAST CAMPBELL AVE (RAILWAY AVE - UNION AVE), 5306(013) 04074364L Campbell PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLIST ACCESS 8/21/2009 2,786,859.00 2,160,000.00 0 S.BASCOM AVENUE (CAMPISI WY - EL SOLYO AVE), ROAD 5306(018) 04925507L Campbell REHABILITATION 6/16/2009 826,691.00 694,000.00 0 8/17/2009 540,237.00 4-Aug-09 1,399,000.00

City & County of San Francisco, MTA/Parking & SAN FRANCISCO INNER SUNSET AREA, TRAFFIC CALMING 6328(030) 04925605L Traffic MEASURES 9/8/2009 505,140.00 343,000.00 0 CLAYTON ROAD AND OAKHURST DRIVE, ROAD 5386(009) 04925415L Clayton REHABILITATION 6/3/2009 554,000.00 554,000.00 0 8/4/2009 442,337.50 22-Sep-09 674,000.00 S. FRANKLIN ST. AND S. CLOVERDALE BLVD., SLURRY SEAL, 5039(021) 04925433L Cloverdale ROAD REHABILITATION 6/2/2009 500,000.00 500,000.00 0 7/22/2009 335,571.70 20-Oct-09 2,250,000.00 IN COLMA: SERRAMONTE BLVD FR COLLINS TO ECR, AC 5264(003) 04925485L Colma OVERLAY 6/1/2009 349,910.00 131,000.00 0 8/19/2009 190,367.00 1-Jul-09 7,275,000.00 5135(036) 04925450L Concord CLAYTON ROAD, A. C. OVERLAY 5/27/2009 1,474,000.00 1,270,000.00 0 9/14/2009 884,111.06 18-Aug-09 3,700,000.00 CLAYTON ROAD INTERSECTIONS, A. C. OVERLAY & 5135(037) 04925451L Concord IMPROVEMENTS 6/3/2009 1,264,000.00 584,000.00 0 7/27/2009 695,881.00 21-Sep-09 2,422,000.00 TWO LOCATIONS- MONUMENT BLVD AND MEADOW LANE, 5135(038) 04925581L Concord SIDEWALK & PEDESTRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 8/6/2009 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0 Contra Costa 5928(091) 04925412L County VASCO ROAD, A.C. OVERLAY 6/3/2009 3,058,000.00 2,762,000.00 0 7/21/2009 1,996,155.00 21-Sep-09 1,900,000.00 1) CASA BUENA DR: SANFORD TO CONOW; 2) TAMAL, 5232(009) 04925484L Corte Madera REHABILITATION 7/9/2009 175,000.00 174,000.00 0 9/15/2009 104,250.00

5383(007) 04925434L Cotati OLD REDWOOD HIGHWAY, ROADWAY REHABILITATION 6/4/2009 528,659.00 500,000.00 0 9/23/2009 507,300.00 23-Jun-09 606,000.00

Page 1 of 5 Status as of 11/17/09

LSRWG 120309 - Page 46 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

CONST_OBLG FEDERAL ARRA FMIS EXPEND LP2000 Award LP20000 Award LA-ODIS Award LA-ODIS Award PROJ NO EA Agency Name DESCRIPTION DT TOTAL COST FUNDS AMT Date Amount Date Amount HOMESTEAD RD (MARY DR TO FRANCO CT), ROAD 5318(025) 04925504L Cupertino REHABILITATION 6/1/2009 940,000.00 757,000.00 0 9/1/2009 707,000.00 20-Aug-09 200,000.00 CALLAN,MISSION,GLNWD,CARTR,HLLSDE,JDALY BLVD, AC 5196(032) 04925490L Daly City OVERLAY 6/3/2009 1,045,000.00 1,045,000.00 0 8/24/2009 908,492.00 21-Sep-09 2,480,000.00 5434(018) 04925453L Danville DIABLO RD. & GREEN VALLEY RD., PAVEMENT OVERLAY 7/1/2009 1,071,000.00 971,000.00 0 8/18/2009 807,142.25

5056(016) 04925463L Dixon N. ALMOND ST. FROM A ST. TO H STREET, A C OVERLAY 6/5/2009 300,000.00 300,000.00 0 8/25/2009 300,000.00 24-Sep-09 1,444,000.00 STRATFORD REHAB. BET. PITT SCHOOL AND WEYAND, CURB 5056(017) 04925464L Dixon GUTTER SIDEWALK SURFACE IMPROV 9/23/2009 218,000.00 218,000.00 0 5438(008) 04925518L East Palo Alto BAY RD, PULGAS AVE, WOODLAND AVE, AC OVERLAY 6/15/2009 529,600.00 421,000.00 0 9/22/2009 444,444.00 2-Sep-09 2,110,000.00 MOESER,ASHBURY,SEAVIEW,BUCKINGHAM,KING, ROAD 5239(014) 04925413L El Cerrito REHABILITATION 6/3/2009 984,000.00 678,000.00 0 7/31/2009 732,032.00 22-Jul-09 5,088,000.00 SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BLVD: JUNE CT - WEST TOWN L, 5277(024) 04925483L Fairfax PAVEMENT RESURFACING 7/1/2009 442,870.00 167,000.00 0 9/28/2009 256,314.50 MCGARY RD BET RED TOP RD AND LYNCH CANYON RD, 5132(032) 04925329L Fairfield REPAIR/REPLACE RD WITH CLASS 2 BIKE 9/23/2009 1,640,000.00 1,640,000.00 0 GATEWAY BLVD. FROM TRAVIS BD TO PENNSYLVANIA, 5132(033) 04925465L Fairfield PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 6/3/2009 1,032,249.00 900,000.00 0 21-Oct-09 3,167,222.00 E. TABOR AVE. FROM VILLA CT TO WALTERS RD., PAVEMENT 5132(034) 04925466L Fairfield REHABILITATION 6/17/2009 900,000.00 900,000.00 0 8/18/2009 431,247.50 6-Oct-09 15,093,000.00 FOSTER CITY BLVD FR BEACH PARK TO BRIDGE LIMT, AC 5409(015) 04925445L Foster City OVERLAY 6/1/2009 471,634.00 440,000.00 0 8/3/2009 406,634.39 1-Sep-09 93,000.00 13 STREETS LOCATED IN CITY, PAVEMENTS REHAB AND 5322(035) 04925422L Fremont CONST.ADA RAMP. 6/1/2009 7,403,578.00 6,677,000.00 0 7/14/2009 5,833,856.20 1-Dec-09 2,086,000.00 CITYWIDE SIDEWALK REHABILITATION, ROAD 5034(020) 04925497L Gilroy REHABILITATION 6/11/2009 779,241.00 663,000.00 0 9/21/2009 387,209.00 28-Oct-09 900,000.00 HALF MOON BAY-MAIN ST; CORREAS TO N/O MILL ST, AC 5357(005) 04925515L Half Moon Bay OVERLAY 6/15/2009 268,620.00 210,000.00 0 8/4/2009 235,481.00 2-Oct-09 305,000.00 CYPRUS,HUNTWOOD,CLAIWITER AND "D" STREET., 5050(036) 04925423L Hayward PAVEMENTS REHAB FOR LOCAL ST. & RDS 5/12/2009 2,536,255.00 2,037,000.00 0 6/30/2009 2,205,743.60 16-Jun-09 699,000.00 1) INDUSTRIAL BLVD: CRYER ST - WEST TENNYSON, 5050(037) 04925586L Hayward PAVEMENT OVERLAY. 8/6/2009 819,646.00 475,000.00 0 10/28/2009 756,736.00 VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN CITY'S LIMIT, ROAD 5027(014) 04925436L Healdsburg REHABILITATION 6/2/2009 520,465.00 500,000.00 0 8/17/2009 509,188.92 20-Oct-09 1,893,157.00 SAN PABLO AVE: JOHN MUIR PKWAY - NORTHERN CIT, A.C. 5117(008) 04925447L Hercules OVERLAY 7/1/2009 805,000.00 671,000.00 0 5191(004) 04925516L Hillsborough RALSTON,BLACK MNTN, TARTAN, AC OVERLAY 6/1/2009 460,917.00 392,000.00 0 8/10/2009 460,917.00 19-Aug-09 461,000.00 DEER HILL RD: FIRST ST - PLEASANT HILL RD AND, 5404(020) 04925414L Lafayette PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 6/1/2009 745,000.00 744,000.00 0 7/17/2009 663,091.05 1-Jul-09 7,275,000.00 MAGNOLIA AVE FROM DOHERTY DR TO WARD ST, 5166(022) 04925481L Larkspur REHABILITATION 7/16/2009 236,000.00 236,000.00 0 9/2/2009 180,529.51 EAST AVE.,PORTOLA ST., AND EAST STANLEY BLVD., 5053(018) 04925424L Livermore PAVEMENT REHAB AND STREET REPAIR.. 6/23/2009 2,006,655.00 1,479,000.00 0 7/27/2009 1,364,348.00 8-Sep-09 4,118,000.00 SAN ANTONIO ROAD REHABILITATION, ROAD 5309(013) 04925505L Los Altos REHABILITATION 6/15/2009 643,454.00 253,000.00 0 9/8/2009 100,000.00 28-Sep-09 1,850,000.00

5324(005) 04925495L Los Altos Hills MOODY RO AND PAGE MILL RD, ROAD REHABILITATION 5/27/2009 414,106.00 316,000.00 0 7/6/2009 311,194.00 18-Aug-09 630,982.00 UNIVERSITY AVE/BLOSSOM HILL RD, SIGNAL UPGRADE & 5067(014) 04925514L Los Gatos ROAD SLURRY 4/23/2009 576,544.00 529,000.00 0 7/9/2009 373,295.00 14-Jul-09 3,929,000.00 VARIOUS STREETS IN MARIN COUNTY (SEE SCOMMENT, 5927(068) 04925476L Marin County REHABILITATION 8/5/2009 2,530,000.00 2,097,410.00 0 9/22/2009 1,575,838.00

5024(023) 04925456L Martinez VARIOUS STREETS IN CITY OF MARTINEZ, SLURRY SEAL 7/9/2009 850,000.00 850,000.00 0 9/2/2009 982,979.00 MARINA VISTA- ESCOBAR "Y" TO BERRELLESA ST., 5024(024) 04925580L Martinez PEDESTRAIN STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 8/6/2009 127,000.00 127,000.00 0 HAVEN,MONTE ROSA,LIVE OAK AVENUES, AC OVERLAY 5273(020) 04925523L Menlo Park REHABILITATION 6/1/2009 924,554.00 635,000.00 0 8/10/2009 582,476.00 1-Sep-09 600,000.00 EDGEWOOD AVE: MARION AVE - SEQUOIA VALLEY RD, 5113(010) 04925479L Mill Valley REHABILITATION 7/1/2009 438,453.00 335,000.00 0 9/21/2009 226,239.72 5299(011) 04925517L Millbrae BROADWAY AND MAGNOLIA, AC OVERLAY 6/1/2009 560,387.00 382,000.00 0 8/10/2009 407,316.20 19-Aug-09 813,000.00

Page 2 of 5 Status as of 11/17/09

LSRWG 120309 - Page 47 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

CONST_OBLG FEDERAL ARRA FMIS EXPEND LP2000 Award LP20000 Award LA-ODIS Award LA-ODIS Award PROJ NO EA Agency Name DESCRIPTION DT TOTAL COST FUNDS AMT Date Amount Date Amount S.PARK VICTORIA DR(BIG BASIN DR-YOSEMITE DR), ROAD 5314(007) 04925496L Milpitas REHABILITATION 6/3/2009 1,239,731.00 1,136,000.00 0 8/4/2009 772,000.00 22-Sep-09 5,600,000.00 5339(001) 04925493L Monte Sereno DAVES AVE (SEE STATE REMARK), ROAD RESURFACING 6/15/2009 195,536.00 94,000.00 0 8/4/2009 99,379.00 2-Nov-09 24,000,000.00 5415(010) 04925446L Moraga MORAGA ROAD, RUBERIZED CAPE SEAL 6/1/2009 660,000.00 609,000.00 0 7/22/2009 541,176.30 1-Jul-09 4,632,000.00 MORGAN HILL-EAST DUNNE AV; BUTTERFIELD TO 101, AC 5152(019) 04925509L Morgan Hill OVERLAY 6/1/2009 556,000.00 556,000.00 0 7/22/2009 456,000.00 1-Jul-09 7,275,000.00 CASTRO ST, MOFFETT BLVD AND FRANKLIN ST, ROAD 5124(027) 04925519L Mountain View REHABILITATION 6/23/2009 871,600.00 851,000.00 0 8/19/2009 724,814.00 8-Sep-09 655,725.00 1) SHURTLEFF AVE: SEVILLE DR - SHETLER AVE; 2, 5042(049) 04925408L Napa REHABILITATION/RESURFACING 7/16/2009 2,096,258.00 1,600,000.00 0 8/18/2009 1,297,969.00 1) HARDMAN AVE: SILVERADO TRAIL - ATLAS PEAK, AC 5921(045) 04925410L Napa County OVERLAY 7/7/2009 775,000.00 775,000.00 0 9/15/2009 406,472.14 1) SILVERADO TRAIL: LARKMEAD LN - GLASS MOUNT, AC 5921(046) 04925522L Napa County OVERLAY 7/9/2009 725,000.00 725,000.00 0 9/15/2009 451,308.05 DELONG,IGNACIO,REDWOOD, ROWLAND, S NOVATO, SU, 5361(022) 04925478L Novato REHABILITATION 7/16/2009 1,292,597.00 1,062,000.00 0 9/8/2009 980,577.75 VARIOUS STREETS AND ROADS - CITYWIDE., CURB RAMPS 5012(098) 04925425L Oakland AND SIDEWALK REPAIR. 5/13/2009 1,229,030.00 1,194,000.00 0 9/22/2009 895,065.00 16-Sep-09 6,087,000.00 VARIOUS STREETS AND ROADS - CITYWIDE., STREETS AND 5012(099) 04925426L Oakland ROADS REHAB.. 5/12/2009 4,774,000.00 4,774,000.00 0 9/22/2009 3,085,955.00 16-Jun-09 2,923,000.00 7TH STREET FROM UNION TO PERALTA STREETS, 5012(100) 04925585L Oakland PEDESTRAIN STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 8/4/2009 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 0 5477(003) 04925416L Oakley OAKLEY ROAD, A.C. OVERLAY 7/1/2009 515,845.00 402,000.00 0 5477(004) 04925417L Oakley DELTA ROAD, A.C. OVERLAY 6/11/2009 494,790.00 403,000.00 0 28-Sep-09 142,000.00

5444(013) 04925452L Orinda CHARLES HILL RD/HONEY HILL RD/MINER RD, AC OVERLAY 6/3/2009 705,345.00 694,000.00 0 7/21/2009 317,261.30 22-Sep-09 600,000.00 5350(016) 04925491L Pacifica MANOR, MONTEREY, ODDSTAD, AC OVERLAY 6/1/2009 1,141,200.00 677,000.00 0 7/13/2009 764,034.20 1-Sep-09 1,625,522.00 LYTTON AVE (FLORENCE ST TO GUINDA ST), ROAD 5100(011) 04925502L Palo Alto REHABILITATION 6/3/2009 741,535.00 580,000.00 0 9/14/2009 580,000.00 20-Oct-09 676,000.00 SAN ANTONIO RD (ALMA ST-MIDDLEFIELD RD), ROAD 5100(012) 04925503L Palo Alto REHABILITATION 6/3/2009 732,757.00 505,000.00 0 9/14/2009 505,000.00 20-Oct-09 1,270,736.00 ELY RD: SONOMA MTN PARKWAY - CORONA RD AND, 5022(044) 04925437L Petaluma REHABILITATION 4/24/2009 1,109,000.00 1,109,000.00 0 7/20/2009 496,188.45 14-Sep-09 1,423,000.00 MCDOWELL BLVD NORTH: LYNCH CREEK WY - DYNAMIC, 5022(045) 04925584L Petaluma ROADWAY REHABILITATION 9/23/2009 956,000.00 728,000.00 0 5126(009) 04924826L Pinole IN CITY OF PINOLE ON APPIAN WAY, AC RESURFACING 1/15/2009 0 0 0 13-Oct-09 2,235,000.00 SAN PABLO AVE.@ FERN/ALVAREZ AND QUINAN, CROSSWALK 5126(010) 04925458L Pinole SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 7/7/2009 236,317.00 214,000.00 0

5126(012) 04925592L Pinole APPIAN WAY FROM SAN PABLO TO TARA HILLS, AC OVERLAY 7/1/2009 420,000.00 420,000.00 0 1) POWER AVE: 300 FT W/O CASE DR - DAVI AVE;2, AC 5127(023) 04925448L Pittsburg OVERLAY 7/9/2009 1,641,736.00 1,103,000.00 0 9/21/2009 1,058,850.00 CONTRA COSTA BL. - 2ND AVE. TO GOLF CLUB DR., A.C. 5375(021) 04925455L Pleasant Hill OVERLAY 6/3/2009 842,000.00 842,000.00 0 22-Jul-09 661,000.00 SANTA RITA ROAD AND STONERIDGE DRIVE., AC OVERLAY, 5101(022) 04925427L Pleasanton ADA, REHAB. 6/3/2009 1,689,000.00 1,588,000.00 0 8/18/2009 979,749.00 21-Jul-09 1,782,000.00 5390(004) 04925520L Portola Valley PORTOLA, CERVANTES, WESTRIDGE, AC OVERLAY 6/15/2009 249,390.00 196,000.00 0 9/17/2009 220,000.00 28-Sep-09 1,500,000.00 5029(020) 04925489L Redwood City JEFFERSON, ROOSEVELT, AC OVERLAY 6/1/2009 736,000.00 736,000.00 0 7/27/2009 578,096.39 1-Sep-09 1,035,000.00 SR82 FROM BROADWAY TO BREWSTER, RECONSRTC ROAD, 5029(021) 04099878L Redwood City SIDEWALK. LIGHT 4/30/2009 703,937.00 523,000.00 0 9/14/2009 1,413,582.80 15-Dec-09 700,000.00 5137(037) 04925457L Richmond CARLSON BLVD., PAVEMENT REHAB. 6/3/2009 5,444,000.00 1,578,000.00 0 7/27/2009 695,881.15 21-Sep-09 800,000.00 9 LOCATIONS: 1) REDWOOD DR: 400 FT NORTH OF, CHIP 5379(017) 04925438L Rohnert Park SEAL AND MAINTENANCE WORKS 6/16/2009 1,153,306.00 869,000.00 0 7/28/2009 1,004,740.00 4-Aug-09 3,227,000.00 SAUNDERS AVE: SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BLVD-CENTER B, 5159(014) 04925480L San Anselmo PAVEMENT RESURFACING 7/1/2009 366,030.00 267,000.00 0 9/17/2009 196,241.00 CITYPRK,CRESTWOOD,JENVEIN,CRESTMOOR IN SNBRNO, AC 5226(016) 04925492L San Bruno OVERLAY 7/22/2009 1,624,195.00 659,000.00 0 9/8/2009 692,228.00 VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN SAN CARLOS, ADA INSTALL AND 5267(013) 04925521L San Carlos UPGRADE 6/16/2009 559,000.00 559,000.00 0 9/14/2009 268,063.82 4-Nov-09 302,000.00

Page 3 of 5 Status as of 11/17/09

LSRWG 120309 - Page 48 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

CONST_OBLG FEDERAL ARRA FMIS EXPEND LP2000 Award LP20000 Award LA-ODIS Award LA-ODIS Award PROJ NO EA Agency Name DESCRIPTION DT TOTAL COST FUNDS AMT Date Amount Date Amount San Francisco JONES STREET FROM MARKET TO CALIFORNIA, 4R PAVING, 5934(147) 04925401L County GRADE, SIDEWALK 4/29/2009 2,066,000.00 2,066,000.00 0 7/20/2009 1,074,179.50 14-Sep-09 3,515,000.00 San Francisco TURK STREET FROM MARKET ST TO VAN NESS AVE, 5934(148) 04925402L County PAVEMENT RENOVATION 4/29/2009 1,549,000.00 1,549,000.00 0 7/21/2009 901,456.50 14-Sep-09 709,000.00 San Francisco DIVISADERO ST: WALLER ST - GEARY BLVD, SEE STATE 5934(149) 04925403L County COMMENTS SCREEN 6/1/2009 3,227,000.00 3,227,000.00 0 8/10/2009 4,342,441.50 1-Sep-09 1,017,998.00 San Francisco 7TH AVE, LAGUNA HONDA BLVD - SEE SCOMMENT, PAVING 5934(150) 04925404L County RENOVATION 4/29/2009 3,840,000.00 3,840,000.00 0 8/19/2009 2,082,770.40 14-Sep-09 532,125.00 San Francisco GEARY BLVD VARIOUS INTERSECTION - SEE SCOMMEN, 5934(151) 04925405L County PAVING RENOVATION 4/29/2009 668,000.00 668,000.00 0 7/15/2009 394,990.00 14-Sep-09 683,000.00 San Francisco EUCLID AVE AND BUSH STREET, SEE SCOMMENT, PAVEMENT 5934(152) 04925406L County RENOVATION 9/23/2009 2,901,550.00 2,000,000.00 0 San Francisco SAN FRANCISCO VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CURB RAMP AND 5934(153) 04925560L County SIDEWALK REHAB/RECON 9/23/2009 1,075,000.00 1,075,000.00 0 VARIOUS STREETS (SEE STATE REMARK), ROAD 5005(096) 04925494L San Jose REHABILITATION 6/26/2009 12,701,000.00 12,701,000.00 0 ALADDIN AVE & WASHINGTON AVE IN SAN LEANDRO, 5041(033) 04925428L San Leandro PAVEMENTS REHAB AND CONST.ADA RAMP. 6/1/2009 1,361,804.00 1,338,000.00 0 7/9/2009 1,692,199.00 1-Sep-09 300,000.00 SPRINGLAKE DR- WASHINGTON AVE TO ACFCD CANAL, 5041(034) 04925597L San Leandro ROADWAY RECONSRUCTION 9/8/2009 454,161.00 350,000.00 0

5102(034) 04925443L San Mateo VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN CITY OF SAN MATEO, AC OVERLAY 5/27/2009 1,196,775.00 1,196,775.00 0 7/24/2009 989,070.00 18-Aug-09 1,045,000.00

5935(054) 04925429L San Mateo County VARIOUS STREETS IN SAN MATEO COUNTY, AC OVERLAY 5/27/2009 2,305,000.00 1,726,000.00 0 8/25/2009 1,691,366.00 19-Aug-09 828,000.00 5303(013) 04925548L San Pablo SAN PABLO AVE., PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 7/16/2009 694,000.00 694,000.00 0 9/8/2009 1,404,765.00 1) NOVA ALBION WY: LAS GALLINAS AVE - NORTHGA, 5043(030) 04925477L San Rafael REHABILITATION 7/9/2009 2,095,659.00 1,188,000.00 0 9/8/2009 1,137,285.30 5437(022) 04925449L San Ramon SAN RAMON VALLEY BLVD., A. C. OVERLAY 6/3/2009 1,749,500.00 1,122,000.00 0 7/28/2009 961,479.35 22-Sep-09 5,000,000.00 CITYWIDE STREET RESEAL (SEE STATE REMARK), STREET 5019(022) 04925510L Santa Clara SURFACE RESURFACING 6/1/2009 1,000,273.00 962,000.00 0 8/3/2009 1,110,415.00 1-Sep-09 320,000.00 5019(023) 04925513L Santa Clara MONROE STREET, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT 7/8/2009 580,900.00 553,000.00 0 8/18/2009 404,585.00 Santa Clara MONTAGUE EXPSWY: 1)HWY 101 - MISSION ST; 2)ZA, ROAD 5937(132) 04925473L County REHABILITATION 5/12/2009 3,054,000.00 3,054,000.00 0 6/24/2009 2,684,000.00 16-Sep-09 828,000.00 Santa Clara 1) MOORPARK AVE: 0.37 MI FROM THORNTON TO S B, ROAD 5937(133) 04925474L County REHABILITATION 6/19/2009 985,000.00 889,000.00 0 8/18/2009 883,202.00 8-Sep-09 2,862,000.00 WEST COLLEGE AVENUE AND SUMMERFIELD ROAD, ROAD 5028(053) 04925435L Santa Rosa REHABILITATION 6/2/2009 3,935,159.00 3,696,000.00 0 8/11/2009 2,595,527.85 20-Oct-09 684,000.00 SARATOGA AVE (SEAGRAVES WY-NE CITY LIMITS), ROAD 5332(014) 04925506L Saratoga REHABILITATION 6/3/2009 714,980.00 714,000.00 0 9/16/2009 701,768.00 21-Jul-09 2,956,000.00 1) BODEGA AVE: PLEASANT HILL AVE - 270 FT W/O, STREET 5123(014) 04925439L Sebastopol REHABILITATION 6/5/2009 641,210.00 500,000.00 0 9/1/2009 532,616.00 23-Sep-09 785,000.00 ALLENDALE RD, CANTELOW RD. AND VARIOUS STREET, 5923(088) 04925467L Solano County PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 4/29/2009 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,622,985.77 6/16/2009 1,764,020.55 14-Sep-09 2,170,000.00 CORDELIA RD. LOPES-CENTRAL & BRDGPORT-PITTMAN, 5923(092) 04925556L Solano County PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AND ENHANCEMENT 8/4/2009 800,000.00 800,000.00 0 5114(014) 04925441L Sonoma 5TH STREET, ROAD REHABILITATION 6/5/2009 600,087.00 500,000.00 0 8/19/2009 484,384.00 24-Aug-09 791,000.00 VARIOUS ROADS AND BRIDGES WITHIN CR LIMITS, CHIP 5920(116) 04925440L Sonoma County SEALING ROADS AND BRIDGES 7/1/2009 6,376,000.00 6,376,000.00 0 9/16/2009 5,422,612.99 South San EAST GRAND AVENUE FR GATEWAY TO HASKINS, AC 5177(022) 04925431L Francisco OVERLAY RECONSTRUCT 5/12/2009 816,451.00 816,451.00 0 7/22/2009 680,410.00 16-Jul-09 670,000.00 SUNSET AVE. FROM SR12 TO RAILROAD AVE., PAVEMENT 5032(022) 04925468L Suisun City REHABILITATION 6/5/2009 700,000.00 700,000.00 0 8/18/2009 632,515.00 25-Aug-09 2,419,896.00 WOLFE RD OVERHEAD 0.3 MI S/O CENTRAL EXPSWY, 5213(032) 04925475L Sunnyvale REHABILITATION 5/8/2009 3,641,000.00 2,745,000.00 0 7/14/2009 1,022,168.00 15-Sep-09 908,000.00 RIDGE RD: VISTAZO WEST ST - STRAIGHTS VIEW DR, 5388(008) 04925482L Tiburon OVERLAY 7/1/2009 270102 204000 0 9/2/2009 318,932.90 PEABODY RD/MARSHALL RD. I/S IN VACAVILLE, SIGNAL MOD, 5094(049) 04925344L Vacaville PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT 5/22/2009 260,000.00 260,000.00 0 5/26/2009 334,713.25 17-Sep-09 6,393,000.00 ALLISON DR,ALAMO DR,PEABODY RD,HELEN POWER DR, 5094(052) 04925470L Vacaville PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 6/3/2009 2,343,000.00 1,376,000.00 0 21-Sep-09 670,000.00

Page 4 of 5 Status as of 11/17/09

LSRWG 120309 - Page 49 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

CONST_OBLG FEDERAL ARRA FMIS EXPEND LP2000 Award LP20000 Award LA-ODIS Award LA-ODIS Award PROJ NO EA Agency Name DESCRIPTION DT TOTAL COST FUNDS AMT Date Amount Date Amount VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN CITY OF VACAVILLE, GPS 5094(053) 04925511L Vacaville EMERGENCY VEHICLE SIGNAL PREMPT 6/5/2009 320,000.00 320,000.00 0 25-Aug-09 355,000.00 SACRAMENTO ST, VIRGINIA ST, MARIN ST., STREETSCAPE & 5030(048) 04925471L Vallejo PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMNT 6/15/2009 4,452,803.00 2,138,000.00 0 2-Mar-10 650,000.00

5030(049) 04925472L Vallejo SERENO DR, TENNESSEE ST, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 6/23/2009 1,161,883.00 1,020,000.00 0 8-Sep-09 1,077,800.00 CIVIC DRIVE FROM ARROYO WAY TO WALDEN ROAD, ROAD 5225(022) 04925454L Walnut Creek REHAB 6/1/2009 1,495,000.00 1,446,000.00 0 7/21/2009 797,736.55 1-Jul-09 7,275,000.00

5472(012) 04925442L Windsor LOS AMIGOS ROAD, LOS AMIGOS ROAD PAVEMENT REHAB. 6/3/2009 596,432.00 596,432.00 0 8/5/2009 376,485.00 22-Sep-09 604,000.00 OLD REDWOOD HIGHWAY FROM JOE RODOTA TO BELL, 5472(014) 04925638L Windsor PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY 8/21/2009 379,263.00 270,000.00 0

TOTAL - D4 $178,199,725 $151,223,262 $1,622,986 $94,856,095 $211,338,163

Page 5 of 5 Status as of 11/17/09

LSRWG 120309 - Page 50 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.1

ARRA Program Supplement Not Received back from local agencies as of 23-NOV-09

Receive From District Project Project Sent To Local Local Agency No. Agency Name Prefix Number Agency Date Date Days Out

04 Alameda County ESPL 5933(098) 07/15/09 128 City & County of San Francisco, MTA/Parking & 04 Traffic ESPLE 6328(030) 11/10/09 13

04 Concord ESPLE 5135(038) 09/09/09 74

04 Cotati ESPL 5383(007) 07/01/09 142

04 Dixon ESPL 5056(017) 10/15/09 38

04 Gilroy ESPL 5034(020) 07/08/09 135

04 Palo Alto ESPL 5100(011) 07/08/09 135

04 Petaluma ESPL 5022(045) 10/15/09 38

04 Redwood City ESPL 5029(021) 10/26/09 27

04 San Bruno ESPL 5226(016) 08/18/09 95

04 San Carlos ESPL 5267(013) 07/15/09 128

04 San Leandro ESPL 5041(034) 09/28/09 55

04 Vallejo ESPL 5030(048) 07/01/09 142

LSRWG 120309 - Page 51 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.2

TO: Local Streets and Roads Working Group DATE: December 3, 2009 FR: Ross McKeown

RE: ARRA Cost Savings Update

At the December 9, 2009 Programming and Allocations Committee (PAC) meeting, MTC staff will recommend for adoption a modification to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Programming Policies, MTC Resolution No. 3885, Attachment A, Item 14; “Cost Savings and Redirection of Unused FHWA Funds”. The proposed revision is in response to Caltrans’ established deadlines to ensure that all regional ARRA funds meet the January 2010 obligation deadline. The proposed language is as follows:

“Cost Savings and Redirection of Unused FHWA Funds. The ARRA set strict deadlines for the use of funds, with the requirement that all funds be obligated by March 2, 2010. To ensure funds are not lost to the state, Caltrans established deadlines in advance of the federal deadline, with all regional ARRA funds required to be obligated or ready for obligation by December 31, 2009. Any remaining funds are subject to redirection by the state. MTC has established deadlines in advance of the state and federal deadlines, with all funds to be obligated by November 30, 2009.

As a result of the continued downturn in the economy, many project sponsors have experienced significant reductions in project costs. Although cost savings are good news overall, the project savings, and subsequent required de-obligation of these funds, can be problematic considering the tight state deadline for delivering the ARRA program by December 31, 2009. Any funds made available as a result of cost savings, must be used within the state and federal deadlines, or they will be lost.

To ensure funds are not lost to the region, any funds remaining un-obligated after the regional obligation deadline, unless extended by the Commission, will be made available for redirection to projects that can demonstrate they can use the funds by the state deadlines. Any funds made available in the local streets and roads or transit system preservation programs will remain within those programs to the extent possible until December 31, 2009.

All other cost savings, and any funds remaining and subject to redirection after December 31, 2009, will be directed to the US 101 Doyle Drive Replacement project, which has already met the federal requirements for funding, so can quickly utilize any redirected funds.”

Comments regarding the proposed language should be directed to Ross McKeown at [email protected] by Friday, December 4, 2009.

RM:ma

LSRWG 120309 - Page 52 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

An Update: Using Federal Economic Stimulus Funds for Transportation

M A C T a y l o r • L e g i s l at i v e A n a l y s t • N o v e m b e r 2 3 , 2 0 0 9

LSRWG 120309 - Page 53 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

LAO Publications This report was prepared by Jessica Digiambattista and Eric Thronson, and reviewed by Dana Curry. The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) is a nonpartisan office which provides fiscal and policy information and advice to the Legislature. To request publications call (916) 445-4656. This report and others, as well as an E-mail subscription service, are available on the LAO’s Internet site at www.lao.ca.gov. The LAO is located at 925 L Street, Suite 1000, Sacramento, CA 95814.

2 L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e

LSRWG 120309 - Page 54 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

Executive Summary The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) provides California with about $3.7 billion in one-time funding for transportation programs, based on formulas. In order to create jobs and stimulate the economy, ARRA focuses on funding “shovel-ready” projects that can begin construction quickly. The federal act also provides funds for various transportation purposes on a discretionary, competitive basis. We reviewed the progress of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), local road agencies, and transit operators in their use of ARRA funds in the months since the enact- ment of the federal stimulus programs and found the following: ➢ Caltrans has made good progress in the use of almost $1 billion made available to the department, already putting out to bid contracts for 92 percent of the funds.

➢ Local road agencies have been slower to use their obligated ARRA transportation funds, with contracts for only one-third of their funds out to bid.

➢ The progress of transit system operators is unclear due to a lack of complete information. From the data we were able to compile, however, the operators appear to be making good progress. The state is competing for discretionary grants, but the amount the state will ultimately receive is not yet fully known. We also found that complete information on the job creation impact of ARRA’s transportation programs is not yet available. We recommend that the Legislature hold oversight hearings on the use of ARRA transportation funds. This would help the Legislature determine if any actions are necessary to ensure that California meets various ARRA deadlines. In addition, the information we recommend be provided in oversight hearings would inform future legislative decisions about providing state funding for transportation programs.

L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e 3

LSRWG 120309 - Page 55 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

4 L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e

LSRWG 120309 - Page 56 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

In February 2009, Congress enacted and their use (such as vehicle miles traveled). Cali- President Obama signed into law ARRA to stimu- fornia’s share of funding includes about $2.6 bil- late the economy. The act provides $787 billion for highways and roads (certain transit and lion in funding for various purposes, including rail-related projects are also eligible for these $46.7 billion for transportation nationwide. funds), and about $1.1 billion for transit pro- These funds are made available to states and grams. The amount of funding that California other recipient agencies via a combination of will receive from discretionary programs is not formula-based programs and discretionary grant yet fully known. This report provides an update programs. focusing mainly on the implementation and use California will receive about $3.7 billion from of the $3.7 billion in highway and transit formula ARRA’s formula-based transportation programs. funds that the state has already begun receiv- These provide funding based on various factors, ing. We also comment on the available evidence including population and the size of each state’s about the effect of these expenditures in terms of transportation systems and various measures of stimulating California’s economy.

Background Major Features of ARRA the act focuses on funding shovel-ready proj- Funds for Transportation ects—projects that are fully (or near fully) de- Focus on Shovel-Ready Projects. As summa- signed and developed and are ready to proceed rized in Figure 1, ARRA has several requirements to construction. to ensure that transportation funds are spent in a Matching Funds Not Required. The ARRA timely manner in order to create jobs and stimu- transportation funds also differ from regularly late the economy. By establishing short timelines, provided federal funding in another way. Federal

Figure 1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Establishes Timelines on the Use of Transportation Funds Highway/Road Formula Funds • Each state must obligate 35 percent of the total funds received by the state by June 30, 2009. • Each state’s total share of funds must be obligated by March 2, 2010. Any funds not obligated by this date will be redistributed to other states that have used all their ARRA highway/road funds. • Any funds that are redistributed must be obligated by September 30, 2010. • Funds that have been obligated are available for expenditure until September 30, 2015. Transit Formula Funds • Each recipient must obligate 50 percent of the total funds received by September 1, 2009. • The balance of the recipients total share of funds must be obligated by March 5, 2010. Any funds not obligated by this date will be redistributed to other entities that have obligated all their ARRA transit funds. • Any funds that are redistributed must be obligated by September 30, 2010. • Funds that have been obligated are available for expenditure until September 30, 2015.

L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e 5

LSRWG 120309 - Page 57 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

transportation programs usually require states or Federal Funding Process local governments to provide funds as a “match” Involves Several Steps for each project, generally from 5 percent to In March 2009, FHWA and FTA apportioned 12 percent of the project’s cost. The ARRA, federal economic stimulus funds to recipient however, does not require any matching funds. states and local agencies. (Apportionment is the This, in theory, allows recipients to use ARRA federal process for determining how much is dollars to get projects under construction quickly available to each recipient and then making those without having to come up with any matching funds available.) After funds were apportioned, funds from other sources. states and local agencies must take a series of Extensive Reporting for Accountability. In steps described below to use the funds on eligible addition, ARRA contains extensive reporting projects. (Eligible projects must [1] be included in requirements. From the time a project is selected the appropriate federal transportation program, (a process known as certification) through the if applicable, [2] have completed the federal completion of the project, the Federal Highway environmental review process, and [3] meet other Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit federal guidelines.) These steps are: Administration (FTA) require regular reports on ➢ Certification. Fund recipients (states, lo- the progress of each project. In addition, recipi- cal agencies, and transit operators) must ents of ARRA transportation funds are also re- first identify and certify with the respec- quired to report on the use of funds to the House tive federal agencies a list of qualifying of Representatives Committee on Transportation projects that the recipient plans to fund. and Infrastructure (T&I Committee). The reports call for information about projects that is not ➢ Obligation. In order to obligate, or com- typically required for federally funded projects, mit, federal funds to a specific project, a such as progress in advertising and awarding project must be fully designed (unless the contracts, and staffing levels of contractors who project uses a design-build procurement are working on the projects. process), have completed environmental Because California’s share of the formula- review and rights-of-way certification, based highway and road funds flow through and be ready to proceed to construction. Caltrans, all reports are compiled by Caltrans For highway and road projects, obligation before being submitted to FHWA and the T&I requests are processed through Caltrans. Committee. In contrast, nearly all the funding For transit projects, obligation requests for transit goes directly to regional agencies and are made directly to FTA. local transit operators. Thus, transit recipients report directly to the federal government and are ➢ Contract Advertisement. Once funding not required to report project status to the state. has been obligated, the project sponsor is authorized to advertise the project and

6 L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e

LSRWG 120309 - Page 58 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

accept bids from interested contractors. ments than is required by ARRA. Figure 2 shows Large to medium projects are typically the allocation of funds under Chapter 21. If local advertised for about 60 to 80 days, while agencies do not use their funds in a timely man- smaller projects are usually advertised for ner, they are to be redistributed within the region about 30 days. or the state. In order to monitor local agencies’ progress on the use of funds, Chapter 21 requires ➢ Contract Award. Once the advertisement regional and county transportation agencies period has ended, bids are evaluated to report to Caltrans the amount of funds that and a contractor is selected to build the would not be obligated by February 1, 2010. Any project (usually the lowest priced bidder). funds that a local agency does not plan to have Selecting a contractor can take as little as obligated by February 1 are to be redistributed one day for small projects and up to one by Caltrans for other projects. While Chapter 21 month or more for medium and large does not specify a deadline for this report, projects. Typically once work begins Caltrans has asked local agencies to submit their on a project, the contractor will receive ARRA-related documents, including obligation progress payments. In general, it isn’t requests, by December 15, 2009. until after the award of a contract that the stimulus impact of ARRA funds on job Figure 2 creation and retention would ordinarily be felt. State Implementation of ARRA Highway and Road Funds (Dollars in Millions) State Legislation Allocates Mix Of Highway and Road Funds Recipient Amount Percentage Local agencies $1,606 62.5% The $2.6 billion that ARRA provides to Cali- Caltrans 964 37.5 fornia for highways and roads can fund improve- Totals $2,570 100% ments and repairs to the state’s highways as well as projects on certain major local roads. Under ARRA, the state must allocate at least 30 percent State’s Share to Be Spent Mainly on High- of these funds to county and regional transpor- way Repairs. Chapter 21 requires that the tation agencies for projects they select (mainly $964 million in ARRA funds made available local road projects). The remaining funds are to Caltrans be used mainly for highway repair available to fund projects selected by the state projects in the State Highway Operation and (typically state highway projects). In March 2009, Protection Program (SHOPP). (The SHOPP is the Legislature enacted Chapter 21, Statutes of the state’s program that funds highway repairs 2009 (ABX3 20, Bass), to direct the use of funds and rehabilitation.) This is because the SHOPP as described below. has many projects that are shovel-ready, includ- Large Portion of Funds Allocated to Local ing $800 million worth of projects we identified Agencies. Chapter 21 provided a greater share of that could be advanced to provide economic the $2.6 billion of stimulus funds to local govern- stimulus (please see our December 2008 report,

L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e 7

LSRWG 120309 - Page 59 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

Advancing Transportation Projects to Stimulate construction on certain non-SHOPP projects in the Economy). In addition, Chapter 21 allows the the state’s Proposition 1B programs. These funds department to use up to $310 million of its ARRA would eventually be repaid and used for projects funds to provide interim cash flow to begin in the SHOPP.

Progress to Date on the Use of Funds California’s progress to date in the use of State Progresses on Highway Projects ARRA transportation funds—specifically, regard- Overall Progress on Use of Highway Funds. ing how quickly ARRA fund recipients in the Figure 3 shows Caltrans’ overall progress in state are moving through the federal funding each major step of using federal ARRA funds for process and using the stimulus dollars—is mixed highway projects based on data available as of overall. As described below, Caltrans is moving mid-November 2009. quickly to use its ARRA funds, while local road Project Certifications Essentially Complete. agencies are experiencing some delays. The As Figure 3 shows, Caltrans has certified to progress of transit system operators is unclear FHWA the selection of projects for its $964 mil- due to a lack of complete information but, from lion in ARRA highway funds. Caltrans staff the data we were able to compile, the operators indicates that the department has also certified appear to be making good progress. additional projects for its share of funds so that Figure 3 projects will be ready to Caltrans’ Progress on Use of ARRA Highway Funds go quickly in the event (In Millions) that some contracts

$1,200 are awarded below their estimated cost. As required by Chap- 1,000 ter 21, Caltrans is funding mainly small- and 800 medium-sized highway repair projects and a 600 few larger Proposi- tion 1B projects with its 400 share of ARRA funds. In total, Caltrans has certi-

200 fied the following types of highway projects:

Total Available Certified Obligated Advertised Awarded

8 L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e

LSRWG 120309 - Page 60 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

➢ $512 million for roadway reconstruction, constructed, but have not been funded due to rehabilitation, and resurfacing. the limited state funding that has been available. (Please see our Analysis of the 2008‑09 Budget ➢ $271 million for new roadway capacity. Bill, page A-32.) In addition, Caltrans has exten- ➢ $128 million for bridge replacement and sive experience with using federal funds and rehabilitation. meeting the various requirements that accom- pany the use of those funds. Based on discus- ➢ $84 million for operational and safety sions with departmental staff, familiarity with improvements. the federal process also appears to have assisted Caltrans in getting projects under way quickly. ➢ $38 million for transportation enhance- Caltrans Benefitting From Competitive Bid- ments (such as bicycle lanes, pedestrian ding Environment. Discussions with Caltrans facilities, and landscaping). staff indicate that the state is also benefitting Caltrans Getting Projects Under Way from a highly competitive bidding environment. Around the State. We also examined the feder- For instance, Caltrans currently receives, on ally required reports to determine how expedi- average, seven to eight bids per project that it tiously recipient agencies are advertising and advertises. This increased competition results in awarding contracts for highway and road work. lower prices for awarded contracts. In July 2009, Our review found that, with regard to its share Caltrans reports that it received bids an average of funds, Caltrans has been able to put many of 33 percent below the department’s project projects out to bid quickly. As shown in Fig- cost estimates. As a result, the department will ure 3, Caltrans has put a total of $883 million be able to construct more transportation proj- (or 92 percent) of its ARRA funds out to bid. ects than first estimated. In anticipation of such This includes the award of 52 contracts of about $400 million in ARRA funds. Contracts have Figure 4 been awarded in locations across California, as Regional Distribution of ARRA shown in Figure 4. An additional 18 projects Contracts Awarded by Caltrans involving $483 million in ARRA funds have (Dollars in Millions) been advertised, but not yet awarded. Because it Number of Amount of typically takes about 60 to 90 days from adver- Region of California Projects ARRA Funds tisement to the award of a contract for highway Northern 6 $61 projects, it is reasonable to expect that these Bay Area 7 50 advertised contracts will be awarded and con- Sacramento/Tahoe 9 93 struction begun by January 2010. Central Valley 11 47 Why Is Caltrans Succeeding in Moving Central Coast 3 15 Ahead? Caltrans has been able to move relatively Los Angeles/Ventura/ 6 27 Orange County quickly with ARRA money mainly because it Inland Empire/Eastern 8 16 has a “shelf” of highway repair and reconstruc- San Diego/Imperial 2 91 tion projects in the SHOPP that are ready to be Totals 52 $399

L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e 9

LSRWG 120309 - Page 61 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

potential savings, Caltrans has identified an ad- ➢ $50 million for 10 transit and rail-related ditional group of projects that now will be able projects (certain transit, rail, and grade to proceed using ARRA funds. separation projects that are eligible for this funding). Local Agencies Slow to Use Obligated Funds for Transportation ➢ $13 million to replace and rehabilitate Figure 5 shows local agencies’ overall prog- 11 bridges. ress in moving through the federal funding Local Agencies Slow to Advertise and Award process as of mid-November 2009. Their prog- Contracts With Obligated Funds. As mentioned ress on specific steps in the use of ARRA funds is above, Chapter 21 directed a large portion of described below. California’s ARRA road funds to local agencies. Certification Essentially Complete. Local However, our review shows that even though agencies have certified to FHWA the selection they have obligated over half of their ARRA of about $1.6 billion in projects for use of their money, local agencies have generally been slow ARRA funds. The types of projects selected by to get projects under way using the obligated local agencies include: funds. As shown in Figure 5, local agencies have ➢ Just over $1 billion for 549 projects to put a total of about $530 million (or 33 percent) reconstruct, rehabilitate, and resurface of their ARRA road funds out to bid. This in- roadways. cludes contracts awarded for $444 million, and

➢ $301 million for Figure 5 7 projects to California’s Progress on Use of ARRA build new road- Local Road Funds way capacity. (In Millions) ➢ $156 million for $1,800 68 projects that would improve 1,600

roadway opera- 1,400 tions and safety. 1,200 ➢ $87 million for 1,000 109 projects that provide 800 transportation 600 enhancements 400 (such as bicycle lanes, pedestrian 200 facilities, and landscaping). Total Available Certified Obligated Advertised Awarded

10 L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e

LSRWG 120309 - Page 62 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

$87 million in ARRA funded work advertised, federal environmental review, among but not yet awarded. The contracts awarded in- other problems. clude one very large project (for high occupancy ➢ No Requirement to Advertise Contracts vehicle lanes on I-405 in Los Angeles) that will Quickly After Obligation. After a local use about $190 million in ARRA funds (account- agency has obligated the funds for a proj- ing for about 40 percent of all local ARRA dol- ect, it is the responsibility of that agency lars awarded), and various smaller projects using to advertise and then award the con- $254 million in ARRA funds. struction contract. (For small-to medium- Slow Progress Likely Due to Various Fac- sized road projects this typically takes tors. We contacted a number of local agencies about 30 to 60 days.) However, once throughout the state to attempt to determine funds have been obligated, there is no what factors are slowing progress in the use of requirement that the project be put out ARRA funds. The information provided in these to bid quickly. In fact, discussions with discussions, while not necessarily representative Caltrans staff indicate that local project of all local agencies, points to several potential sponsors typically have at least one year reasons: to advertise and award a contract before ➢ Some Projects Were Not Truly Shovel- the obligation becomes inactive. These Ready. Multiple local agencies indicated agencies are in compliance with ARRA that some of the projects they have time requirements, but are clearly not in planned to fund with ARRA dollars were line with federal or state policy goals to not fully designed and/or did not have a create an immediate economic stimulus. completed federal environmental review Local agencies indicated that, at least in at the time that ARRA funds became some instances, the delays reflect the available. Design and environmental preferences of the local agencies, such review must be completed before funds as concerns about constructing during can be obligated. winter weather or the ability of their staff ➢ Lack of Experience in Using Federal to handle increased workload. Funds. Unlike Caltrans, many cities and Caltrans Not Responsible for Local Delays. counties do not frequently receive federal Based on our discussions, it appears that Cal- transportation funds. Consequently, these trans is not responsible for local agencies’ slow agencies must spend extra time relearn- progress. In fact, almost all agencies we talked to ing a complex federal process each time indicated that Caltrans has been quick to provide they spend federal dollars on a transpor- technical assistance and to process requests to tation project. This situation is contribut- obligate funds and certify environmental reviews ing to confusion about which types of for local projects. Similarly, Caltrans reports that projects are eligible for ARRA funding, it is processing all ARRA-related requests expe- the process for getting a project into the ditiously and there are currently no backlogs in federal program, and how to obtain a responding to local requests for ARRA-funded

L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e 11

LSRWG 120309 - Page 63 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

projects. Because advertising and awarding con- The information provided to the T&I Committee, tracts for local projects are the responsibilities in contrast, must include these details. However, of the local sponsors, Caltrans has no ability to the committee’s Web site only summarizes each speed up the process and get these projects out recipient’s progress in the aggregate for all of its to bid and under construction. projects, including the amounts of funding obligated, advertised, and awarded each month. This Information Incomplete but Suggests summary does not include information on the Transit Operators Are Spending Funds progress of individual projects. As mentioned earlier, California receives Because the reports to Congress potentially roughly $1.1 billion in formula transit funding could provide us with more detailed informa- under ARRA. Nearly all of this funding is being tion, we contacted the T&I Committee to request distributed directly to the regional agencies and copies of the reports submitted by individual local operators in the state, including $968 mil- California recipients. However, we were unable lion for bus, rail and related capital assistance, to obtain this information at the time this report and $66 million for light and commuter rail was prepared. Thus, our analysis relied upon the systems. Caltrans is directly administering only summary information available on the commit- $34 million for use in nonurbanized areas. The tee’s Web site. We also directly contacted ARRA initially required all of the transit funding 28 of the largest operators throughout the state for to be used for capital expenditures. Congress copies of their reports to the T&I Committee. We subsequently adopted language to allow transit received project-specific information from 22 of operators to use up to 10 percent of their alloca- these operators, comprising roughly $705 million tions for operating expenditures. (66 percent) of all transit funds distributed to the Complete Information Difficult to Obtain. state. Based on the information described above, As direct recipients of ARRA funds, transit agen- we were able to draw the following conclusions. cies report directly to FTA as well as the Transit Operators Appear on Track With T&I Committee, with the two reports each Use of Funds. According to the FTA, recipi- requiring slightly different information. The re- ents in the state are making significant progress cipients are not required to provide information toward obligating their transit funding. As of Sep- to any state-level entity concerning the use of tember 10, $988 million (93 percent) of the tran- their funds. Consequently, it is difficult to com- sit dollars received by California operators have prehensively track the state’s progress in the use been obligated. At this rate, the state should have of ARRA transit funding. For instance, Caltrans no problem meeting the ARRA requirement to indicates that it only tracks the use by recipients obligate all transit funds by March, 2010. Of the for the $34 million it directly administers. The funds obligated, the T&I Committee’s summary FTA tracks projects submitted for funding, but its report shows that, as of September 30, $498 mil- reports indicate only the date at which funds are lion worth of projects have been advertised to obligated and when the money is subsequently bid. This indicates the state’s operators have put spent. Recipients are not required to report to out to bid nearly 47 percent of the total funding FTA when contracts are advertised or awarded. in less than six months. Given their progress so

12 L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e

LSRWG 120309 - Page 64 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

far, it appears likely that the state’s ARRA transit California Competing for grant recipients will be able to spend all of their Discretionary Grants funds by the 2015 deadline. In addition to the various types of transporta- Funds Used for a Variety of Purposes. From tion funding programs discussed above that are the operators who provided project-specific in- allocated among states by formula, ARRA also formation, we were able to roughly ascertain the created several new programs to provide trans- types of projects being funded by ARRA. Spe- portation grants on a discretionary, or competi- cifically, these recipients plan to use 32 percent tive, basis. The state’s status in competing for of their funding ($222 million) for operating and these funds is briefly described below. maintenance expenses. This includes spending High-Speed Rail Funding Applications Sub- $161 million on preventive maintenance, such mitted. The ARRA provides $8 billion under the as bus and railcar repairs to extend the equip- High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program to ment’s useful life, and an additional $61 million fund two categories of rail projects: (roughly 8 percent of total funds received) on ➢ First, the applications for shovel-ready, operating expenditures, such as paying for vari- intercity passenger rail projects were due ous contracted services. The remaining funding from the states in August. California’s (68 percent) will be used for a wide range of $1.1 billion application included a request capital expenditures. These capital projects can for $400 million for the Transbay Terminal be divided roughly into three categories: and $744 million for 37 projects related to ➢ New construction projects, or projects the state’s intercity rail program. that add capacity to existing systems such as extending train lines or building new ➢ Second, applications for high-speed rail terminals. development programs, in which projects are not immediately ready for construc- ➢ New or replacement rolling stock, such tion but could be quickly, were due in as buses and train cars. October. The state’s High-Speed Rail ➢ Rehabilitation of current infrastructure Authority (HSRA) applied for more than and rolling stock as well as service up- $4.7 billion in funding for this second grades, such as new information technol- category and has indicated that it plans ogy or farebox collection systems. to use the federal dollars to match state Because respondents reported the total costs bond dollars for high-speed rail develop- of each project from all funding sources—includ- ment and construction. ing ARRA and non-ARRA funds—we were un- The Federal Railroad Administration expects to able to determine the exact amount of stimulus announce grant selection as early as January 2010. funding used for each category. The data avail- California Applied for TIGER Grants. The able on the T&I Committee Web site indicate ARRA also provides $1.5 billion nationwide for that transit operators in general plan to spend Grants for Transportation Investment Generating ARRA money for similar purposes. Economic Recovery (known as TIGER grants) for

L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e 13

LSRWG 120309 - Page 65 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

transportation projects that would have a signifi- $100 million for energy consumption reduction cant national economic impact. While the grants grants to transit operators on a competitive basis. will be awarded on a competitive basis, ARRA The Capital Investment Grants were awarded in limits the amount that any one state can receive July to 11 recipients across the country. Los Ange- to $300 million. Eligible entities in California, les County Metropolitan Transportation Authority such as Caltrans, regional governments, transit (LACMTA) received an award for $66.7 million operators, and port authorities, have submitted to partially fund the construction of a rail line applications for TIGER grants totaling at least extension from Union Station to East Los Ange- $2.3 billion for a variety of roadway, port, and les, the only award to a California agency. The rail projects. At the time we prepared this report, FTA awarded the energy consumption reduction however, the U.S. Department of Transportation grants in September to 43 recipients across the was still evaluating applications and selecting country. Four California operators were awarded projects. Thus, the amount that will be provided grants totaling $17.5 million, including $6.4 mil- for these projects in California is not yet known. lion for Alameda-Contra Costa Transit, $4.6 mil- California Operators Awarded Transit Dis- lion for the City of Santa Clarita, $4.5 million for cretionary Grants. The ARRA provides $750 mil- LACMTA, and $2 million to the North County lion nationwide for Capital Investment Grants and Transit District in San Diego County.

Economic Stimulus Still Unknown Stimulus From Highway Spending Past Estimates Indicate Many Jobs Related Unclear, but Should Be Significant to Highway Spending. While we do not have a ARRA Jobs Reports Not Yet Providing complete accounting of the ARRA transporta- Complete Information. As noted above, ARRA tion program’s economic impacts, some general requires recipients of highway and road funds to estimates on the number of jobs related to high- report each month on the number of jobs associ- way spending are available. The FHWA recently ated with each project. While these reports are estimated that $1 billion spent on highway in- currently available, the information reported to frastructure supports about 15,000 jobs directly, date does not appear to be consistent or com- and about another 15,000 jobs indirectly. While plete. For example, it is not clear whether the job we have not reviewed in detail FHWA’s method- counts are being reported on a consistent basis ology for developing these estimates, we believe for each contractor. The U.S. Government Ac- based on our past analysis of transportation countability Office noted recently that questions spending that these projections are a reasonable have been raised about the quality of the data rule of thumb to use in evaluating the success in the ARRA reports. However, some informa- of the ARRA programs. Thus, based on FHWA’s tion is available that permits us to provide some estimates, the nearly $1 billion in ARRA funds initial comments on the potential impact of these allocated to Caltrans for state highway projects activities on the state’s economy. We outline this could potentially, directly create or retain about information below. 15,000 jobs.

14 L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e

LSRWG 120309 - Page 66 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

Most Stimulus From Local Road the economic effect of ARRA transit spending on Spending Has Not Yet Materialized the state. The number of fund recipients, lack of Contracts Must Be Awarded Before Stimulus a centralized data source on these projects, and Will Be Felt. Similar to the highway program, the the lack of project-by-project details make it diffi- ARRA jobs report for local road projects have not cult to accurately determine the impact of ARRA yet provided the information necessary to deter- transit funding on California. Additionally, the mine the number of jobs created or retained by choice of projects made by local operators could funding these projects. In any event, the slow prog- greatly affect the timing and extent of any benefit ress in the award of construction contracts means to the state’s economy. For example, to the ex- that these projects are not yet providing much, if tent that the federal economic stimulus funds are any, economic stimulus to California’s economy. being used for the purchase of new rolling stock, While local road projects could potentially support the potential benefits to the state’s economy may many jobs in California’s construction sector and be delayed. This is because procurement of new related industries, this impact will not be fully felt buses and rail cars can often take several years, until these local projects move forward. and the new equipment may be manufactured outside the state. Similarly, other purchases made Magnitude of Stimulus From by transit operators from out-of-state vendors and Transit Spending Is Unclear manufacturers, such as for computer software, Some Economic Stimulus Benefits to Cali- spare parts, or other equipment, may have a lim- fornia May Be Delayed or Limited. At this time, ited stimulus effect for the California economy. it is very difficult to ascertain the magnitude of Legislative Hearings Would Increase Oversight In summary, our review found that local recommend that the Legislature conduct over- agencies, which control the largest portion of sight hearings on the state’s progress in using transportation stimulus funds, have been relative- ARRA funding for transportation and the eco- ly slow to use obligated ARRA funds to get their nomic stimulus resulting from the expenditures road projects under way. However, the reasons of those funds. This would help the Legislature for this are unclear. In addition, our assessment to be better informed of the progress and use of the state’s progress in using ARRA transit funds of ARRA funds for transportation, and how the is hampered by a lack of complete information. federal money is helping California’s transporta- Lastly, discretionary grant programs created by tion programs. Specifically, the Legislature should ARRA are still in various stages of development have agencies that are receiving ARRA funds and project selection, so information on the report on the following matters: funding available to California from these pro- ➢ Why Local Agencies Are Not Using grams is not yet fully known. ARRA Funds More Quickly. Local agen- Legislature Should Hold Oversight Hear- cies should report on any problems that ings. In light of these unanswered questions, we are holding up the use of ARRA funds.

L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e 15

LSRWG 120309 - Page 67 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 4B.3

A n L A O R e p or t

Specifically, local agencies should explain cally, transit operators should be asked why contracts are not being advertised to provide project-specific information and awarded more quickly for projects. that describes what projects are being In addition, local agencies should report funded with federal economic stimulus on how they will get on track to meet the funds and how the funding would impact February 1, 2010 deadline established in transit services in the state. In addition, Chapter 21 for them to obligate funds. For transit agencies should be requested instance, local agencies should explain to report on how much of the stimulus what steps they are taking to get projects funding is being used for operating and ready to go in order to meet both the maintenance expenses. This information federal and state deadlines. would assist the Legislature in making future decisions involving state funding of ➢ How Caltrans Plans to Redistribute transit capital and operations. Unobligated Funds. As noted above, Chapter 21 directs Caltrans to redistribute ➢ How High-Speed Rail Funds Would ARRA funds that local agencies will not Be Used. The Legislature should direct obligate by February 1, 2010. This gives the HSRA to provide an update on the the state about only one month to commit projects that would be funded with ARRA these funds to alternative projects prior funds. To the extent the funding will be to the funds becoming unavailable under used for rail projects along the planned ARRA on March 2, 2010. In light of these high-speed corridor, the authority should upcoming deadlines, Caltrans should re- identify the benefits that would be real- port on its efforts to monitor the progress ized as a result of the projects in the in- of local agencies and its plan for redis- terim period before the entire high-speed tributing these funds in the event that the train system would be completed. Further ARRA funds allocated to local agencies explanation of the authority’s planned ex- for road projects are not on track to be penditure of these federal funds would en- used. In particular, the department should able the Legislature to allocate future state report on whether it would fund addition- funding for the project more effectively. al SHOPP projects with the redistributed The oversight hearings that we propose funds, given Caltrans’ reports of a remain- would allow the Legislature to become better in- ing $270 million backlog in such projects formed about the progress in using ARRA funds that are now unfunded but shovel-ready. for transportation projects. This would help to ➢ How Transit Operators Are Progressing ensure that the state meets the ARRA deadlines With Their Projects. Given the difficulty as well as the overall policy goal of stimulating of obtaining data regarding the use of the state’s economy. Lastly, understanding how ARRA funds for transit, the Legislature ARRA funds are being spent in the state would should request that these recipients help inform future legislative decisions concern- report on a number of issues. Specifi- ing how much state funding to provide for transportation programs.

16 L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t ’ s O f f i c e

LSRWG 120309 - Page 68 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A.1 Agenda Item 5

TO: Bay Area Partnership DATE: December 1, 2009 FR: Alix Bockelman RE: New Federal Transportation Act – Update on Proposal for Cycle 1 Programming and Cycle 2 Framework

This memorandum provides an update on the development of the New Federal Transportation Act (New Act) Cycle 1 programming and Cycle 2 framework proposal. Staff will be taking the final proposal to the Programming and Allocations Committee and the Commission in December. The overall recommended programming proposal, included as Attachment A, has not changed since November. In summary, the proposed framework of the New Act follows the categories below: ¾ Required payback of Obligation Authority ($54 million) ¾ Maintain on-going programs ($206 million) ¾ Seize opportunity to deliver system-wide improvements ($222 million) ¾ Fund other core Transportation 2035 categories ($848 million) ¾ Fund strategic investments and regional commitments ($71 million)

Two areas that have been refined since November and are discussed in more detail below are the Climate Initiatives Program and the Congestion Management Agency Block Grant program administration.

Development of the Staff Recommended Proposal Starting in June 2009, staff presented an overall framework to direct roughly $1.1 billion of estimated funds through FY 2014-15. In September, staff presented an initial proposal to the Programming and Allocations Committee that reflected changes based on stakeholder input and increased the proposal to $1.4 billion. Additional comments, program developments and proposal revisions were presented at the October and November Committee meetings. Over a six month period, staff has consulted the Partnership working groups, commission advisory committees and heard comments from a variety of transportation stakeholders, resulting in three rounds of revisions to the proposal. The table on the following page compares the original proposal presented to the Partnership Board last June and the current proposal for both Cycle 1 and the ARRA Backfill funding commitments in the near-term (FY2010 through FY 2012); and the overall total new six-year commitment, including anticipated revenues.

LSRWG 120309 - Page 69 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A.1

Staff Proposal Comparisons: June 2009 and Final Versions Cycle 1 and ARRA Backfill Total New Commitment Initial Initial Final Draft Final Draft Partnership Change Partnership Change Proposal Proposal Programs Board Board SAFETEA OA Carryover 68 54 (14) 68 54 (14) Regional Planning 23 23 - 48 48 - Regional Operations 84 84 (0) 158 158 - Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) 136 105 (31) 222 222 - Climate Initiatives 52 80 28 88 162 74 Regional Bicycle Program 21 27 6 42 67 25 Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) 71 85 14 169 223 54 Transit Capital Rehabilitation - 115 164 49 Regional Streets and Roads Rehabilitation 72 100 28 163 232 69 Corridor Mobility (SCL I/C Imps) 32 32 - 32 32 - MTC Res 3814 Transit Payback Commitment 31 (31) 31 31 - Trade Corridor (Richmond Rail Connector) 8 8 - 8 8 - Total 598 598 (0) 1,144 1,401 257 Given the funding constraints and many competing demands, the proposal attempts to strike a balance among the various key Transportation 2035 programs and strategic investment areas. While the proposal does not achieve fully the stakeholder requested funding levels, it does reflect some significant revisions to that end in nearly all of the funding categories. It is also worth noting that there are synergies across program categories. In many cases, investments funded within one program lead to improvements that benefit other modes and program categories. For example the Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) program funds improvements that benefit bicycle projects (Regional Bicycle Program) and Safe Routes to Transit projects (Climate Initiatives). Projects funded in the Local Streets and Roads Rehabilitation Shortfall Program often result in travel condition improvements for pedestrians, buses, and bicyclists. Further, several programs not bearing the “climate change” label – such as TLC and Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) – fall in the same general range for cost-effective CO2 reduction as programs that are included in the new Climate Initiative Program.

Climate Initiatives Working Group The Climate Initiative Working Group held its last meeting on November 20th to finalize the Climate Initiatives Program concept. The working group included Commissioners Haggerty and Kinsey, MTC staff, and staff representatives from the Air District, Solano Transportation Authority (representing CMAs), County Connection (representing the transit operators), TransForm, and the Joint Policy Committee. The overall objective of the Climate Initiatives Program is to make short-term investments that reduce transportation-related emissions and vehicle miles traveled, and encourage the use of cleaner fuels. Another prime objective is building a knowledge base through evaluation that informs the most effective Bay Area strategies for the Sustainable Communities Strategy and next long-range plan.

The working group is recommending an $80 million Cycle 1 program with four primary elements: 1) Public Education / Outreach; 2) Safe Routes to Schools; 3) Innovative Grants; and 4) Climate Action Program Evaluation. Within the total program amount, $3 million is also proposed to fund CMAQ eligible projects in Eastern Solano County per an agreement that covers the Sacramento Air Basin. The table below presents the program components and grant amounts, followed by program descriptions:

LSRWG 120309 - Page 70 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A.1

Cycle 1 Climate Intiatives Program Components and Funding (million $s) Cycle 1 Program Components Program % 80 100% Eastern Solano CMAQ 3 Public Education / Outreach 10 13% Safe Routes to Schools 17 23% Innovative Grants 36 SFgo* 10 60% Climate Action Program Evaluation 4 5% Total 80 100% *Assumes SFgo partly funded in first cycle ($10M) and partly in second cycle ($10M)

Public Education / Outreach ($10 million): The objective of this program is to develop a regional campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, influence the public to make transportation choices to reduce these emissions, and evaluate the effectiveness of strategies used. The following specific tasks are included: • Launch a branded, Bay Area climate campaign in 2011; • Develop tools to encourage smart driving or other emission reduction strategies; and • Support school and youth programs to train the next generation. This program will be further developed by MTC staff in cooperation with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Safe Routes to Schools ($17 million): This element would further implement Safe Routes to Schools (SR2S) programs region-wide with the overall goal of significantly reducing emissions related to school-related travel. It would also increase the ability of Bay Area jurisdictions to compete for state and federal SR2S infrastructure grants. Within the SR2S program, $15 million would be distributed among the nine Bay Area counties based on K-12 school enrollment. An additional $2 million would be available on a competitive basis to one or more counties to expand implementation of creative school-related emission reduction strategies and to determine their effectiveness and potential replication throughout the Bay Area. Attachment B details the county distribution. Innovative Grant Program ($46 million - $36 million competitive and $10 million for SFGo): The purpose of Innovative Grant Program is to fund a smaller number of higher-cost/higher- impact/innovative projects on a broader geographic scale (i.e., citywide or countywide). The Innovative Grant Program would achieve two basic objectives: • Test the effectiveness of three strategies that have high potential for reducing emissions, but have not been sufficiently tested for replication on a larger scale throughout the Bay Area. Included in this category are: 1) Parking management/innovative pricing policies; 2) Acceleration of efforts to shift to cleaner, low GHG vehicles; and 3) Transportation demand management strategies. • Generate more Bay Area innovation and engage local communities by funding up to five major transportation-related projects that expand or combine strategies to measurably reduce emissions and showcase results at specific locations to increase understanding about whether these strategies result in cost-effective emission reduction and, if

LSRWG 120309 - Page 71 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A.1

successful, how the results could be replicated elsewhere. Included in this category are: 1) Initiatives defined in locally-adopted Climate Action Plans or plan equivalent; or 2) Expansion of other innovative ideas that have yet to be fully evaluated as to their cost- effectiveness This program would be regionally competitive, giving higher priority to projects that are located in priority development areas (PDAs) and projects that offer contributions from other sources to leverage the CMAQ investment and build partnerships. The process for soliciting projects would include regional workshops, an abbreviated request for interest, and a more involved request for project proposals from projects deemed most promising from the request for interest review. The staff proposal continues to include $20 million for the SFgo project as a component of the Climate Initiatives Program but recommends that the funding be split over the two cycles ($10 million in Cycle 1 and $10 million in Cycle 2) to provide more funding for the competitive innovative grant program. Should additional “anticipated” revenues become available, staff proposes to accelerate the remaining $10 million for SFGo. This transit priority measure project will decrease traffic congestion and improve transit operations by synchronizing intersections, and furnishing and installing traffic cameras and variable message signs for traffic monitoring and information dissemination.

Climate Action Program Evaluation: The evaluation element is intended to serve a twofold purpose: 1) provide additional data for ongoing evaluation efforts that estimate project/program greenhouse gas emission impacts, including co-benefits for other criteria pollutants; and 2) assess the overall effectiveness of projects and programs funded by the Climate Action Program, including public education/outreach, SR2S, and innovative grants.

While the Safe Routes to Transit (SR2T) program is not currently being recommended as a stand-alone program element, staff recommends that a focused assessment and marketing program be conducted for the RM2-funded SR2T program during Cycle 1. Staff intends to work closely with the East Bay Bicycle Coalition and TransForm to design a SR2T evaluation and marketing program that evaluates selected in-progress and approved future projects and promotes the benefits and availability of selected existing projects and projects currently under development.

Block Grant Program Administration Critical to the proposed programming framework is the administration and project selection for the program areas. The staff proposal identifies a lead agency for administration in each program area. In general, MTC is proposing to be the lead for program areas of regional scope or with a network impact and is proposing that the Congestion Management Agencies be the lead for programs with a local/community focus.

LSRWG 120309 - Page 72 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A.1

Transportation 2035 Core Programs Manager Block Grant Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) and MTC, Caltrans and CMAs the Regional Signal Timing Program. Climate Initiatives (Public Outreach/ MTC and Bay Area Air Quality Innovative Grants/ Evaluation) Management District

Climate Initiatives – Safe Routes to Schools County – TBD Regional Bicycle Program CMAs Yes TLC – Regional MTC TLC – County CMAs Yes Regional Streets and Roads Rehabilitation CMAs Yes Transit Capital Rehabilitation MTC

For three core programs managed by the CMAs, MTC will be making funding available to the CMAs by means of a “PDA block grant” to allow more flexibility and more strategic project selection. The PDA block grant will encompass the Regional Bicycle Program, County TLC Program, and the Local Streets and Roads Shortfall (LSR) Program, functioning as follows: • Planning Activities: Up to 4% of the block grant can be used by a CMA for planning purposes. • Flexibility Provision: Up to 20% of each program’s funds may be flexed from one Block Grant program to fund another in order to recognize practical project delivery considerations and unique county priorities. CMAs can request flexibility beyond the 20% through their Strategic Plan for consideration by the Commission. • PDA Block Grant Strategic Plan: By April 1, 2010, CMAs are asked to submit a Strategic Plan to MTC outlining their approach for programming their block grants. This Plan would include: o Amount of funds for CMA planning purposes and rationale behind any flexing of program amounts within the Block Grant Programs (beyond the 20% noted above). Examples might include flexibility to deliver on a complete streets approach or deliver investments that better support PDAs. This would be submitted to the Commission for approval. o Approach used to select LSR Shortfall Program amounts if it differs from the LSR regional distribution formula as discussed below. o Safe Routes to Schools Program recommended county approach, including lead agency for project selection and federal funding recipient, and any request for additional funding to expand implementation of creative school-related emission reduction strategies. o Complete Streets approach. o Priority Development Area priorities. • Call for Projects and Delivery Timeline: CMAs are requested to issue one unified call for projects addressing all of their respective Block Grant programs in early 2010. The final project list is due to MTC by July 30, 2010. Funds are to be programmed over a two- year period with 50 percent programmed in FY 2010-11 and 50 percent in FY 2011-12. Projects would need to be obligated no later than April 30th in the year of programming.

LSRWG 120309 - Page 73 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A.1

New Act Programming Page 6

• Fund Distribution: Attachment C summarizes the proposed distribution for the block grant programs by county based on the formula factors below. o County TLC program: based on county population share. o Local Streets and Roads Rehabilitation Shortfall Program: based on four factors, each weighted 25%, including population, lane mileage, arterial and collector shortfall, and preventive maintenance performance. The population and lane mileage factors result in the support of PDAs. To ensure this PDA emphasis, CMAs shall use the same allocation formula for streets and roads distribution within the counties. Acknowledging the competing objective above through grant minimums, CMAs may propose to defer some jurisdiction programming to Cycle 2 or use local funds. o Regional Bicycle Program: $19.5 million is distributed to each county based on a hybrid formula consisting of 50% population, 25% bikeway network capital cost, and 25% unbuilt bikeway network miles. The proposal also includes a partial payback to counties that did not receive their population share under the regionally competitive Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Program during SAFETEA with the remaining half of the payback proposed in Cycle 2. The $7.5 million in Transportation Enhancement portion of this program is subject to 2010 State Transportation Improvement Program rules.

Next Steps The revised funding proposal will be presented to PTAC next week. The overall New Act funding framework and Cycle 1 programming proposal will be presented to the Programming and Allocations Committee on December 9th and to the full Commission for approval on December 16th.

Attachments

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\BOARD\_2009 Partnership Board\03_PartnershipBoard_Dec2009\05_New_Act_Program.doc

LSRWG 120309 - Page 74 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A.1

Attachment A New Transportation Authorization Act-- STP/CMAQ with ARRA Backfill Outlay (amounts in millions $) New Commitments Program and Project Investments Committed ARRA Backfill Described in attached summary ARRA STP/CMAQ STP/CMAQ/TE & STP/ Anticipated Total New Programming ARRA1 Backfill Cycle 1 Cycle 2 CMAQ/TE Total Revenue2 Commitment 08/09 08/09 09/10 - 10/11 -11/12 12/13 - 13/14 - 14/15 09/10-14/15 Estimated Apportionment Revenues 662 113 485 568 1,166 235 1,401 Annual Programs 1 Required SAFETEA OA Carryover 54 54 54 2 On-Going Regional Planning 23 25 48 48 3 On-Going Regional Operations 84 74 158 158 Total 161 99 260 260 T 2035 Core Programs 4 Focus 1 Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) 19 74 31 86 191 31 222 5 Focus 2 Climate Initiatives3 80 34 114 48 162 6 Focus 2 Regional Bicycle Program 10 8 19 20 47 19 67 7 Focus 2 Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) 85 96 181 42 223 8 Focus 3 Transit Capital Rehabilitation 286 125 125 39 164 9 Focus 3 Regional Streets and Roads Rehabilitation4 145 100 77 177 55 232 Total 461 82 316 438 835 235 1,070 Strategic Investments 10 Safety Projects (Vasco Road and North Bay counties) 13 11 Express Lane Network (580 and 237/880) 14 12 Transit Expansion (Oakland Airport Connector) 70 13 Advance Prop 1B Construction (Caldecott Tunnel) 105 14 Corridor Mobility (SCL I/C Imps) 32 32 32 15 MTC Res 3814 Transit Payback Commitment 31 31 31 16 Trade Corridor (Richmond Rail Connector) 888 Total 201 32 8 31 71 71 Grand Total 662 114 485 568 1,166 235 1,401

1 $112.5 M in ARRA Backfill is included within the $661.9 M ARRA Programming Amount ($105 M for Caldecott Tunnel and $7.5M for TE). Some transit operators elected to fund non-maintenance projects (i.e. preventative maintenance, operations) in the system preservation category. 2 Anticipated revenues are based on a 10% annual authorization increase as compared to the assumed 4% in the base proposal over six years. Portion available for Cycle 1 programming is $60 million from apportionments over the first three years. 3 Includes $20M for SFgo 4 Includes PTAP and FAS of $28M

LSRWG 120309 - Page 75 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A.1

Attachment B Safe Routes to Schools Program Detail Total School Total Annual Estimated Cost of Program Percentage Total Funding Enrollment (K-12)1 Funding

Innovative Approaches TBD 666,667 2,000,000 Supplemental School Roll-out 5,000,000 15,000,000 Alameda 239,163 21% 1,073,184 3,219,553 Contra Costa 183,230 16% 822,199 2,466,597 Marin 35,260 3% 158,220 474,661 Napa 23,406 2% 105,029 315,086 San Francisco 80,177 7% 359,774 1,079,323 San Mateo 106,160 10% 476,367 1,429,100 Santa Clara 300,064 27% 1,346,462 4,039,387 Solano 69,972 6% 313,982 941,946 Sonoma 76,836 7% 344,782 1,034,347 Total 1,114,268 100% 5,000,000 15,000,000 Total Cost 5,666,667 17,000,000 Note: 1) These figures are from the California Department of Education's website for FY 2008-09 and include both public and private schools

LSRWG 120309 - Page 76 of 118 LSRWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A.1

New Act Programming Page 9 Attachment C New Act Cycle 1 STP/CMAQ CMA Block Grant Program

Initial Draft Amounts Available (thousands $)

Block Grant Program CMA Planning (max. 4%)

Regional Taken off the top Counties LS&R Rehab. County TLC Bicycle of all programs

Alameda $16,051 $5,962 $3,836 TBD Contra Costa $10,793 $4,152 $2,367 TBD Marin $2,453 $1,010 $1,649 TBD Napa $1,906 $540 $605 TBD San Francisco $7,863 $3,115 $1,368 TBD San Mateo $6,838 $2,878 $1,739 TBD Santa Clara $17,354 $7,121 $4,638 TBD Solano $6,436 $1,664 $1,349 TBD Sonoma $9,306 $1,891 $1,949 TBD

Totals $79,000 $28,333 $19,500 TBD

Notes LSR Rehab based on formula used for ARRA pending updated factors LSR Rehab Does not include PTAP/PMP/FAS TLC amount reflects one third of total TLC program - to be admininstered by County CMAs RBP distribution based on draft proposal (50% population/25% cost/25% miles with reconciliation) pending decision on formula to be used.

J:\PROJECT\Funding\T4 - New Act\T4 - STP-CMAQ \T4 New Act - Cycle Programming\T4 First Cycle\T4 Reauthorization Policy Development\Block Grants\[Revised Block Grant Amounts.xls]Dec 09 PAC memo

LSRWG 120309 - Page 77 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A(2)

STP/CMAQ Cycle 1 and 2 Programming Proposal Local Streets and Roads Working Group

What do increased transit ridership, efficient goods movement, bicycle and pedestrian access, Focused Growth, and any freeway congestion management program have in common? Their success all rest upon the foundation of a functioning street and road network. Maintenance of the existing street and road network is not about expanding roadway capacity in order to create an environment conducive for driving. It is about preserving the base upon which all modes of travel rely. If investment in the existing street and road network is continuously deferred in favor of enhancement programs or expansion projects, the foundation will continue to deteriorate—to the ultimate detriment of all other transportation priorities.

MTC has requested that the region’s transportation stakeholders serving in the various working groups that advise the Partnership Board develop proposals that reflect their preferred options for the programming of STP and CMAQ funds over the next six years. Attachment A is a proposal developed by the Local Street and Road Working Group (LSRWG) that reflects one of the main themes of the recently adopted Transportation 2035 plan—“Fix-it-First”. An explanation of the proposal is provided in detail below. Additional justification for the LSRWG framework is also provided.

LSRWG Proposal:

• Keep funding for the Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) whole at $222 million by providing $31 million in funding off the top of the “anticipated” revenue. Reduce funding for FPI in the first cycle from $62 million to $39 million and from $89 million to $78 million in the second cycle.

Rationale o The program consists of multiple IT projects at multiple, widely separated locations. While reducing the program in the first cycle, the $113 million ($39 million in Cycle 1 funds plus $74 million in ARRA Backfill funds) investment still represents a significant investment. o MTC staff includes $235 million in “anticipated” revenue in their latest programming framework. Staff proposal states “Portion available for Cycle 1 Programming is $60 million from apportionments over the first three years.” o Reducing the amount of CMAQ used for FPI in the first and second cycles would free up more of this fund source for other programs that can use it and in turn, would free STP funds to be used to further “Fix It First” goals.

LSRWG 120309 - Page 78 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A(2)

• Increase funding for Regional Streets and Roads Rehabilitation to $109 million in the first cycle and $91 million in the second cycle.

Rationale o Supports “Fix it First” philosophy o Recognizes need for early investment to maximize investment savings and minimize further deterioration of the region’s local streets and roads conditions o Recognizes a higher cost benefit through early investment o Recognizes proven track record of ability to deliver projects in a timely manner o Local Roads maintenance / rehabilitation did not receive a proportional share of ARRA funding

• Distribute “Anticipated” funding to reflect Transportation 2035 investment commitments which results in increasing the commitment of “anticipated” revenue for streets and roads to $89 million and transit rehabilitation to $74 million.

Rationale o Per Transportation 2035, 80 percent of “Anticipated” revenue should go towards maintenance of the existing system. Anticipated revenue represents funding above and beyond what was projected to be available from specified sources. These funds could take the form of existing programs. The MTC staff proposal indicates that the anticipated revenue included in the programming framework is based on more revenue becoming available than what had been projected in the Plan from the STP/CMAQ fund source. The LSRWG proposal appropriately distributes these funds according to the investment framework put forth in the Plan for anticipated revenues after deducting $31 million from the total in order to fund the FPI program at staff’s proposed level. o While funding is reduced in the LSRWG proposal for several of the core programs, additional funding for maintenance of the transit system and for the roadways required by transit, bicyclists and pedestrians, cannot be seen as being at cross-purposes with Climate Initiatives, TLC or the Regional Bike Program.

Further Justification for the LSRWG Proposal

Existing resources to fund the maintenance of the existing street and road network in the Bay Area fall short by more than $200 million per year. The California Assembly’s reversal of the recent proposed raid of local gas tax subvention funds to help cover the State budget deficit— while a welcome turn of events—merely keeps the region’s local street and road network at the same place it was at the time Transportation 2035 (T2035) was developed—underfunded by 50% of what is needed to bring conditions up to a pavement condition index (PCI) of 75 over the next 25 years. Without additional funding, the street and road network in the Bay Area is projected to deteriorate from the current PCI of 64, to 42 by the year 2032.

LSRWG 120309 - Page 79 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A(2)

Transportation 2035 MTC Commissioners recognized that it makes no sense to spend limited regional transportation resources to enhance or expand on an existing foundation that will continue to deteriorate if not addressed. The “Fix it First” philosophy that was made prominent in T2035 reflects that recognition.

During the T2035 investment trade-off discussions, local public works representatives stressed the need to invest early if the $7 billion dollar regional commitment to street and road maintenance were to be effective in preventing further deterioration of the region’s average street and road condition over the course of the Plan period. Early investment in street and road maintenance has been found to have a benefit to cost ratio of five to one. While other strategic investments in the Plan may have a higher calculated benefit cost ratio than maintenance of the existing system, the scale of the savings that can be realized by investing early in the existing infrastructure far exceeds anything else. The existing street and road capital maintenance funding shortfall is $18 billion. Every billion dollars that is invested in preservation of the system will save five billion in long-term costs associated with deferring needed maintenance. In addition to the enormous savings this represents for the region’s taxpayers, it also impacts the level of regional resources that will be available to invest in other transportation priorities.

While it has been said many times by MTC staff and it is understood that T2035 is a plan and not a programming document, it is difficult to see the point of such a plan when right out of the starting gate the priorities and actual funding streams deviate sharply from the framework established.

Also understood is the fact that funding sources often come with restrictions and will not necessarily flex to conform neatly to the goals and commitments outlined in the Plan. This is why it is critical that where flexible funding sources are available, that they are applied appropriately according to the priorities that the region has set and with consideration of the types of fund sources that are likely to be available in the future. To this end, the Congestion Management / Air Quality Program (CMAQ) funds currently proposed in the MTC Staff’s Plan for the Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) should be directed in larger proportions to programs uniquely eligible for these funds, such as the Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) Program. This would allow the Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds to be spent on Local Streets and Roads Maintenance to achieve the “Fix it First” goal. Because, outside of the recent American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) program, known regional discretionary revenue sources that can be applied against the local streets and roads maintenance shortfall consist of exactly one: Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. Therefore, it is our position that these funds be used to prioritize the “Fix it First” goals set forth in T2035, as opposed to programming funds into a strategic investment such as the Freeway Performance Initiative which is more rightly viewed as a long range goal.

Project Delivery The Bay Area Region, through MTC’s leadership, has been successful in meeting “timely use of funds” requirements by delivering street and road system preservation projects ahead of Federal deadlines. These efforts provided opportunities for our region to secure additional STP/CMAQ funding from other parts of the state that did not deliver their projects in a timely manner. The end results were additional streets and roads rehabilitation projects that provided Bay Area 3

LSRWG 120309 - Page 80 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A(2)

September 21, 2009

residents with pavement and safety improvements which includes such components as American with Disability Act curb ramp installations. We encourage that these policies continue and that Cycle 2 Funding allocations be conditioned on programs ability to deliver their projects in a timely manner.

Regional Investments since the Adoption of T2035 Prior to approval of the federal economic stimulus act, local jurisdictions submitted a list of approximately $1 billion “shovel-ready” projects that were deemed deliverable within the time frames being considered for the legislation. Of the $662 million in ARRA funding that was or will be at MTC’s discretion to distribute, $145 million has been obligated for street and road maintenance and rehabilitation. That amount is less than 22% of the total and far less than the 43% share of “anticipated” revenues that T2035 said would be going to fund the local street and road maintenance shortfall. While not all the region’s share of the ARRA funding was eligible for street and road maintenance expenditure, there were clearly opportunities to fund streets and roads at a far greater level than what has been achieved.

In addition to the ARRA funding, MTC staff’s proposal for the first and second cycles of STP/CMAQ funding falls short of targets identified in T2035.

Following is a comparison of the T2035 investment framework and the actual investment practice that has been applied with the ARRA funding and is being proposed by MTC staff for the ARRA backfill funding from the State in combination with the STP/CMAQ Cycles 1 & 2 program. It illustrates how far the region has strayed, the calculated difference between the investments identified in the Plan and the actual percentages that have been received or are being proposed for local streets and roads.

Transportation 2035 vs. Actual / Planned Investment Comparison Actual / Diff. In Dollars Funding Source T2035* Planned (Billions) Anticipated / Unspecified 43.4% 21.9% $ 0.142 STP/CMAQ* 25.5% 21.7% $ 0.030 Total Amount Behind / Needed to be On Par with Plan: $ 0.172

*Does not assume the front-loading of climate initiative funding

Therefore, if T2035 is to have any significance at all, actual funding practice should more closely resemble its investment framework.

LSRWG 120309 - Page 81 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 5A(2) Attachment A - LSRWG STP/CMAQ CYCLE 1 AND CYCLE 2 PROGRAMMING PROPOSAL September 21, 2009

(Amounts in Milliions) MTC Staff Proposal - 09/09/09 LSRWG Proposal - 09/21/09 ARRA Backfill ARRA Backfill Committed & & ARRA ARRA1 STP/CMAQ STP/CMAQ/TE STP/CMAQ/ Anticipated Total New ARRA1 STP/CMAQ STP/CMAQ STP/CMAQ Anticipated Total New Programming Backfill Cycle 1 Cycle 2 TE Total Revenue2 Commitment Backfill Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Total Revenue2 Commitment 08/09 08/09 09/10 - 10/11 - 11/12 12/13 - 13/14 - 14/15 09/10 - 14/15 Estimated Apportionment Revenues 662 113 485 568 1,166 235 1,401 113 485 568 1,166 235 1,401 Annual Programs 1 Required SAFETEA OA Carryover 68 68 68 68 68 68 2 On-Going Regional Planning 23 25 48 48 23 25 48 48 3 On-Going Regional Operations 84 74 158 158 84 74 158 158 Subtotal Annual Programs 0 0 175 99 274 0 274 0 175 99 274 0 274 T 2035 Core Programs 4 Focus 1 Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) 19 74 62 86 222 222 74 39 78 191 31 222 5 Focus 2 Climate Initiative3 59 34 93 55 148 59 34 93 18 111 6 Focus 2 Regional Bicycle Program 10 8 16 20 44 22 66 8162044751 7 Focus 2 Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) 78 96 174 49 223 78 96 174 16 190 8 Focus 3 Transit Capital Rehabilitation 286 119 119 45 164 119 119 74 193 9 Focus 3 Regional Streets and Roads Rehabilitation 4 145 86 83 169 63 232 109 91 200 89 289 Subtotal Core Programs 460 82 301 438 821 234 1055 82 301 438 821 235 1056 Strategic Investments 10 Safety Projects (Vasco Road and North Bay Counties) 13 11 Express Lane Network (580 and 237/880) 14 12 Transit Expansion -- Oakland Airport Connector 70 13 Advance Prop 1B (Caldecott Tunnel) 105 14 Corridor Mobility (SCL I/C Imps) 32 32 32 32 32 32 15 MTC Res. 3814 Transit Payback Commitment 31 31 31 31 31 31 16 Trade Corridor (Richmond Rail Connector) 8 8 8 888 Subtotal Strategic Investments 202 32 8 31 71 71 32 8 31 71 71

Grand Total 662 114 484 568 1,166 1,400 114 484 568 1,166 1,401 1$112.5 M in ARRA Backfill is included within the $661.9 M ARRA Programming Amount ($105 M for Caldecott Tunnel and $7.5M for TE) 2Anticipated revenues are based on a 10% annual authorization increase as compared to the assumed 4% in the base proposal over six years. Portions available for Cycle 1 programming is $60 milliion from apportionments over the first three years. 3Includes$20M for SFgo. 4Includes PTAP and FAS of $28M

LSRWG 120309 - Page 82 of 118 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO CHANGE LS&RWG -12/03/09: Item 5C

TO: Local Streets and Roads Working Group DATE: December 3, 2009 FR: Theresa Romell

RE: 25-Year Local Street and Road Shortfall Estimates & 1st Cycle Allocation

Over the last year, MTC’s Regional Streets and Roads staff has been working with the Local Streets and Roads (LSR) Working Group and local jurisdictions to update the 25-year estimate of capital maintenance shortfalls on the region’s streets and roads.

Attachment A contains the draft LSR shortfalls estimate for your review. The estimates are segmented into three components—pavement, non-pavement and total maintenance shortfall estimates. Each component lists the needs, revenues and shortfalls that exist on the Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) and non-MTS segments of the LSR network, by jurisdiction. The MTS consists of arterial and collector roadways.

Each jurisdiction’s proportionate share of the regional MTS shortfall is one of the four factors included in the allocation formula used to distribute regional funds for LSR maintenance. The other factors are population, lane mileage, and performance. Attachment B provides the draft distribution of the Cycle 1 Surface Transportation Program (STP) funding based on the allocation formula and including the updated shortfall estimate. Please note that the funding distribution assumes the level of funding for LSR maintenance that has been proposed for Cycle 1 by MTC staff, after deducting funds for the Federal Aid Secondary and the Pavement Technical Assistance Programs. The final figure may change based on on-going discussions with stakeholders and the Commission

The shortfall estimates and the distribution figures will be finalized following the December 3rd meeting of the LSR Working Group. Changes to the figures will not be possible after December 8, 2009, as MTC staff will be bringing the Cycle 1 program to its Programming and Allocations Commission on December 9th, for approval. Questions or requested corrections to the estimates should be directed to Theresa Romell at [email protected] or (510) 817-5772.

Following is information on the methodology used to derive the shortfall estimates. As a reminder, the Pavement and Non-Pavement Needs portions of the shortfall estimates were distributed to local jurisdictions for review and comment last July and September, respectively.

Pavement Needs In determining the pavement need portion of the maintenance shortfall, MTC staff used a combination of information on maintenance treatment costs derived from the latest survey of local jurisdictions and model runs performed on each jurisdiction's StreetSaver® pavement management system database. Average treatment costs were calculated for each of the nine counties and their jurisdictions based on survey responses. These costs were inserted into a

LSRWG 120309 - Page 83 of 118 LS&RWG -12/03/09: Item 5C

standardized, regional, “best practices” decision tree and imported into each jurisdiction’s StreetSaver® database prior to running the 25-year unconstrained pavement needs analysis. The costs for pavement maintenance needs were escalated at a 3% annual growth rate over the 25- year period. The pavement need information was categorized into MTS need, and non-MTS need based on the information provided by StreetSaver®.

Non-Pavement Needs The latest local street and road maintenance survey requested information on major non- pavement assets in the region including: Storm drains, sidewalks, curb and gutter, traffic signals, and street lights. The specific information requested included inventory, the expected useful life of those assets, and the approximate replacement costs associated with each asset type. MTC contracted with Nichols Consulting Engineers to develop a model for estimating non-pavement need based on the non-pavement asset survey information provided by local jurisdictions. The result of their work was a mathematical model that used the inventory of curb and gutter and streetlights to predict the total regional non-pavement replacement costs. The total regional non- pavement asset replacement cost was then divided by the average useful life for each of the major non-pavement asset groups in order to estimate an annual maintenance cost. The regional totals were then divided into city non-pavement need and county non-pavement need. The city need was distributed across all jurisdictions based on relative population share and the county need was distributed across the unincorporated jurisdictions based on total lane mileage. San Francisco was considered as a city only. The non-pavement need was categorized as MTS and non-MTS based on the same proportion of MTS and non-MTS to total pavement need.

Revenue Revenues for pavement and non-pavement maintenance were projected using information provided by local jurisdictions in the local street and road maintenance survey. The information was used to determine the amount of funding that was available for local street and road capital maintenance derived from local and county sources, as well as to determine the categorical split—pavement maintenance, non-pavement and operations/other—by which each jurisdiction expends revenues available for maintenance. For the local and county generated revenue sources, an annual average was determined based on five years worth of each jurisdiction’s budget data. The annual average was then split by expenditure category and grown over the 25- year period. The growth rate used for locally generated revenue was approximately 2% (based on information derived from historical state controller data) and the growth rate used for countywide sales tax measure revenue was based on information provided by the county sales tax authorities. Projections of statewide revenue traditionally used for local street and road maintenance including funds derived from the state gas tax subvention, Proposition 42, and Proposition 1B were prepared by MTC and split between expenditure categories according to the information provided by each jurisdiction on their survey. The nominal growth rate for gas tax revenue is approximately 1.2% annually, and for Proposition 42 funding, about 5% annually. Revenues were assigned to MTS and non-MTS categories based on the same proportion of MTS and non-MTS need, to total need.

Missing Revenue Information: Where local jurisdictions did not respond completely to survey questions regarding the availability of local funding for maintenance or how available funds were split among eligible street and road categories, MTC staff applied certain assumptions in order to estimate the revenue available. Below are some of the assumptions made in response to missing information:

• No revenue reported – if a jurisdiction did not report any revenue for LSR maintenance, that jurisdiction’s revenue was estimated by applying the average dollar amount per mile

LSRWG 120309 - Page 84 of 118 LS&RWG -12/03/09: Item 5C

in the county, to that jurisdiction’s total mileage. This was done for each of the fund sources.

• Did not specify categorical split for funding – if a jurisdiction included a revenue total but did not specify how the funding was distributed between pavement, non-pavement, operations, and other, MTC staff assumed the categorical split for each category to be equal to the average proportional split for the other jurisdictions in the county.

• Proposition 42—revenue was assumed to be split 50/50 between pavement and non- pavement maintenance, as this fund source can only be used for capital maintenance, not operations.

• Local measure sales tax— if jurisdictions did not show revenue coming from sales tax, MTC assumed an amount equal to the latest year’s worth of revenue as shown in the sales tax authorities’ annual reports. The categorical split for these funds was assumed to be equal to the average proportional split for the other jurisdictions in the county.

Shortfall Summary The capital maintenance shortfall for each jurisdiction was determined by subtracting the projected revenues from the projected needs. The shortfalls were further categorized into MTS and non-MTS shortfalls.

Where revenue exceeded need, no surplus was shown, as surpluses would not be available to be applied to the remaining need for other jurisdictions. In addition the shortfall figures do not include the cost of deferred maintenance, which increases the maintenance need dramatically, and makes the existence of actual surpluses, extremely unlikely.

Below is a summary of the draft LSR capital maintenance shortfalls, summed at the county level. The total regional 25-year shortfall of $17.6 billion reflects a 3% decrease from the last shortfall estimate that was completed two years ago, for the purpose of informing the regional transportation plan, Transportation 2035.

Jurisdiction Total Need Total Revenue Total Shortfall MTS Shortfall Non-MTS Shortfall Alameda $ 6,235,253,644 $ 2,972,161,282 $ 3,464,265,911 $ 1,878,347,954 $ 1,585,917,957 Contra Costa $ 4,323,068,848 $ 3,020,741,883 $ 1,647,973,672 $ 818,667,341 $ 829,306,332 Marin $ 1,132,250,206 $ 714,582,975 $ 442,834,323 $ 166,705,652 $ 276,128,671 Napa $ 964,816,083 $ 295,046,580 $ 672,886,277 $ 292,745,555 $ 380,140,721 San Francisco $ 4,142,150,095 $ 2,160,562,644 $ 1,981,587,451 $ 1,027,411,634 $ 954,175,817 San Mateo $ 2,632,378,854 $ 1,754,480,489 $ 1,240,312,481 $ 533,825,274 $ 706,487,207 Santa Clara $ 7,399,960,368 $ 3,807,592,843 $ 3,615,544,949 $ 1,442,242,457 $ 2,173,302,492 Solano $ 2,336,917,516 $ 670,970,600 $ 1,809,941,585 $ 779,302,060 $ 1,030,639,525 Sonoma $ 3,748,777,720 $ 959,734,176 $ 2,789,043,543 $ 1,319,890,311 $ 1,469,153,232 Total $ 32,915,573,333 16,355,873,472 $ 17,664,390,192 $ 8,259,138,237 $ 9,405,251,955

LSRWG 120309 - Page 85 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09:Attachment Item 05C(i) A DRAFT 2009 LS&R 25-YEAR SHORTFALLS -- November, 2009 In Escalated Dollars Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall County of Alameda $ 424,377,487 $ 241,883,607 $ 182,493,879 625,066,529 356,270,895 268,795,634 - - - $ - Alameda $ 323,300,450 $ 182,991,790 $ 140,308,660 114,452,817 64,781,617 49,671,200 208,847,633 118,210,173 90,637,459 $ 182,540,077 Albany $ 64,265,801 $ 30,618,374 $ 33,647,427 51,239,509 24,412,213 26,827,296 13,026,291 6,206,160 6,820,131 $ 21,296,678 Berkeley $ 455,055,188 $ 198,484,051 $ 256,571,137 243,484,372 106,201,986 137,282,387 211,570,816 92,282,065 119,288,751 $ 300,612,033 Dublin $ 158,863,387 $ 94,876,319 $ 63,987,069 31,956,812 19,085,232 12,871,580 126,906,575 75,791,086 51,115,489 $ 78,359,940 Emeryville $ 39,064,113 $ 34,061,958 $ 5,002,154 8,125,372 7,084,919 1,040,453 30,938,741 26,977,040 3,961,702 $ 16,507,243 Fremont $ 925,484,381 $ 611,118,835 $ 314,365,547 177,043,997 116,906,264 60,137,733 748,440,384 494,212,571 254,227,813 $ 719,258,053 Hayward $ 541,924,157 $ 213,582,117 $ 328,342,040 168,779,468 66,519,042 102,260,425 373,144,689 147,063,075 226,081,615 $ 287,140,120 Livermore $ 374,654,515 $ 150,530,713 $ 224,123,802 97,681,279 39,246,911 58,434,367 276,973,237 111,283,802 165,689,435 $ 226,468,193 Newark $ 207,365,796 $ 157,928,044 $ 49,437,752 50,991,260 38,834,514 12,156,746 156,374,537 119,093,530 37,281,007 $ 124,566,004 Oakland $ 1,730,722,282 $ 811,761,847 $ 918,960,435 884,330,836 414,778,293 469,552,543 846,391,446 396,983,555 449,407,891 $ 1,198,046,267 Piedmont $ 42,507,747 $ 14,655,541 $ 27,852,207 42,992,253 14,822,585 28,169,668 - - - $ - Pleasanton $ 311,209,073 $ 208,159,801 $ 103,049,272 163,687,257 109,486,226 54,201,031 147,521,815 98,673,575 48,848,241 $ 201,495,233 San Leandro $ 382,174,377 $ 169,586,354 $ 212,588,023 233,032,607 103,406,069 129,626,537 149,141,771 66,180,285 82,961,486 $ 229,035,930 Union City $ 254,284,890 $ 182,212,784 $ 72,072,106 79,296,914 56,821,746 22,475,168 174,987,976 125,391,038 49,596,938 $ 181,048,507 COUNTY TOTAL $ 6,235,253,644 $ 3,302,452,135 $ 2,932,801,510 2,972,161,282 1,538,658,513 1,433,502,769 $ 3,464,265,911 $ 1,878,347,954 $ 1,585,917,957 $ 3,766,374,278

Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall County of Contra Costa $ 489,774,763 $ 247,218,311 $ 242,556,452 424,785,224 214,414,244 210,370,980 64,989,539 32,804,067 32,185,472 $ - Antioch $ 451,593,698 $ 184,523,895 $ 267,069,803 255,964,766 104,588,740 151,376,027 195,628,931 79,935,155 115,693,776 $ 161,644,021 Brentwood $ 193,095,811 $ 77,796,005 $ 115,299,807 386,022,815 155,523,999 230,498,817 - - - $ 106,790,684 Clayton $ 51,681,816 $ 20,372,290 $ 31,309,526 9,348,133 3,684,911 5,663,223 42,333,682 16,687,379 25,646,303 $ 30,890,027 Concord $ 431,922,875 $ 175,962,451 $ 255,960,424 262,089,507 106,773,488 155,316,019 169,833,368 69,188,963 100,644,405 $ 116,248,027 Danville $ 182,922,300 $ 49,110,350 $ 133,811,950 220,125,825 59,098,624 161,027,200 - - - $ 71,307,728 El Cerrito $ 104,136,978 $ 37,192,747 $ 66,944,230 41,572,492 14,847,706 26,724,786 62,564,486 22,345,042 40,219,444 $ 66,574,729 Hercules $ 94,745,834 $ 46,898,957 $ 47,846,878 27,706,596 13,714,697 13,991,899 67,039,238 33,184,259 33,854,979 $ 60,372,617 Lafayette $ 106,107,583 $ 48,614,690 $ 57,492,893 100,513,932 46,051,880 54,462,052 5,593,651 2,562,810 3,030,841 $ 15,708,511 Martinez $ 152,127,833 $ 62,760,448 $ 89,367,385 44,714,948 18,447,184 26,267,764 107,412,884 44,313,263 63,099,621 $ 140,790,129 Moraga $ 98,202,567 $ 63,047,642 $ 35,154,925 27,331,575 17,547,315 9,784,260 70,870,992 45,500,327 25,370,665 $ 71,016,434 Oakley $ 135,973,524 $ 64,312,245 $ 71,661,278 38,070,980 18,006,669 20,064,311 97,902,544 46,305,577 51,596,967 $ 89,211,911 Orinda $ 113,759,346 $ 43,545,549 $ 70,213,797 85,472,406 32,717,688 52,754,718 28,286,940 10,827,860 17,459,080 $ 36,109,020 Pinole $ 80,083,141 $ 31,608,920 $ 48,474,221 56,619,208 22,347,675 34,271,533 23,463,933 9,261,245 14,202,688 $ 20,110,173 Pittsburg $ 272,156,020 $ 129,633,135 $ 142,522,885 192,533,783 91,707,536 100,826,247 79,622,237 37,925,600 41,696,638 $ 142,024,234 Pleasant Hill $ 133,414,477 $ 39,683,881 $ 93,730,596 91,365,982 27,176,637 64,189,345 42,048,495 12,507,245 29,541,251 $ 73,566,157 Richmond $ 514,906,660 $ 338,995,253 $ 175,911,406 224,939,177 148,091,527 76,847,650 289,967,482 190,903,727 99,063,756 $ 467,003,738 San Pablo $ 87,248,648 $ 50,304,837 $ 36,943,811 202,764,827 116,907,847 85,856,979 - - - $ 20,531,693 San Ramon $ 255,026,571 $ 112,180,931 $ 142,845,640 196,355,939 86,372,930 109,983,009 58,670,632 25,808,002 32,862,631 $ 46,842,189 Walnut Creek $ 374,188,401 $ 214,544,842 $ 159,643,559 132,443,767 75,938,022 56,505,745 241,744,635 138,606,820 103,137,814 $ 167,516,694 COUNTY TOTAL $ 4,323,068,848 $ 2,038,307,380 $ 2,284,761,468 3,020,741,883 1,373,959,318 1,646,782,565 $ 1,647,973,672 $ 818,667,341 $ 829,306,332 $ 1,904,258,714

Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall County of Marin $ 362,852,063 $ 102,756,802 $ 260,095,261 241,915,004 68,508,394 173,406,609 120,937,060 34,248,408 86,688,652 $ 257,975,502 Belvedere $ 8,822,980 $ 1,686,581 $ 7,136,400 13,096,377 2,503,473 10,592,904 - - - $ 572,788 Corte Madera $ 36,575,677 $ 11,596,741 $ 24,978,936 56,556,989 17,932,046 38,624,943 - - - $ 29,993,772 Fairfax $ 30,408,844 $ 19,164,699 $ 11,244,145 22,162,852 13,967,792 8,195,061 8,245,992 5,196,908 3,049,084 $ 23,517,815 Larkspur $ 64,452,943 $ 7,967,482 $ 56,485,460 16,925,756 2,092,312 14,833,444 47,527,187 5,875,170 41,652,016 $ 53,172,482 Mill Valley $ 70,475,138 $ 34,922,423 $ 35,552,714 45,012,735 22,305,083 22,707,652 25,462,403 12,617,341 12,845,062 $ 48,673,527 Novato $ 213,807,421 $ 93,697,349 $ 120,110,072 151,446,585 66,368,807 85,077,777 62,360,836 27,328,542 35,032,294 $ 202,699,936 Ross $ 12,119,234 $ 4,838,613 $ 7,280,621 13,031,616 5,202,882 7,828,734 - - - $ 3,325,286 San Anselmo $ 55,982,866 $ 30,666,679 $ 25,316,187 27,814,834 15,236,601 12,578,233 28,168,032 15,430,078 12,737,954 $ 26,131,468 San Rafael $ 214,581,254 $ 85,976,715 $ 128,604,539 80,016,101 32,060,217 47,955,884 134,565,153 53,916,498 80,648,654 $ 213,662,336 Sausalito $ 23,544,635 $ 23,517,813 $ 26,822 14,449,599 14,433,138 16,461 9,095,036 9,084,675 10,361 $ 15,251,561 Tiburon $ 38,627,152 $ 17,951,251 $ 20,675,901 32,154,527 14,943,219 17,211,308 6,472,625 3,008,032 3,464,593 $ 24,587,008 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,132,250,206 $ 434,743,147 $ 697,507,059 714,582,975 275,553,964 439,029,011 $ 442,834,323 $ 166,705,652 $ 276,128,671 $ 899,563,480

Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall County of Napa $ 367,419,313 $ 190,880,105 $ 176,539,208 160,950,683 83,616,408 77,334,275 206,468,630 107,263,697 99,204,934 $ 417,135,498 American Canyon $ 75,828,449 $ 33,962,486 $ 41,865,963 12,225,390 5,475,579 6,749,811 63,603,059 28,486,907 35,116,151 $ 60,994,464 Calistoga $ 20,861,301 $ 9,833,239 $ 11,028,062 13,735,767 6,474,528 7,261,239 7,125,534 3,358,711 3,766,823 $ 12,199,150 Napa $ 446,000,972 $ 163,383,985 $ 282,616,987 90,661,105 33,211,974 57,449,131 355,339,867 130,172,011 225,167,856 $ 339,183,899 St. Helena $ 42,463,741 $ 24,693,904 $ 17,769,837 2,114,554 1,229,675 884,879 40,349,186 23,464,229 16,884,957 $ 38,798,766 Yountville $ 12,242,307 $ 4,778,617 $ 7,463,690 15,359,082 5,995,208 9,363,874 - - - LSRWG$ 120309 12,333,717 - Page 86 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09:Attachment Item 05C(i) A COUNTY TOTAL $ 964,816,083 $ 427,532,336 $ 537,283,746 295,046,580 136,003,371 159,043,209 $ 672,886,277 $ 292,745,555 $ 380,140,721 $ 880,645,494

Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall San Francisco $ 4,142,150,095 $ 2,147,618,160 $ 1,994,531,935 2,160,562,644 1,120,206,526 1,040,356,117 1,981,587,451 1,027,411,634 954,175,817 $ 1,438,920,607 COUNTY TOTAL $ 4,142,150,095 $ 2,147,618,160 $ 1,994,531,935 2,160,562,644 1,120,206,526 1,040,356,117 $ 1,981,587,451 $ 1,027,411,634 $ 954,175,817 $ 1,438,920,607

Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall County of San Mateo $ 217,526,818 $ 82,183,576 $ 135,343,242 569,652,719 215,219,888 354,432,831 - - - $ - Atherton $ 34,183,527 $ 7,597,483 $ 26,586,044 44,471,742 9,884,097 34,587,645 - - - $ 2,700,659 Belmont $ 106,703,495 $ 41,441,683 $ 65,261,812 34,798,109 13,514,948 21,283,161 71,905,386 27,926,735 43,978,651 $ 78,274,093 Brisbane $ 21,869,274 $ 13,962,326 $ 7,906,948 10,617,361 6,778,600 3,838,761 11,251,912 7,183,726 4,068,186 $ 19,736,213 Burlingame $ 98,271,822 $ 62,455,769 $ 35,816,052 51,541,397 32,756,670 18,784,727 46,730,425 29,699,100 17,031,325 $ 69,325,204 Colma $ 15,266,685 $ 15,266,685 $ - 8,432,777 8,432,777 - 6,833,908 6,833,908 - $ 5,148,117 Daly City $ 292,360,284 $ 137,076,669 $ 155,283,616 113,804,047 53,358,409 60,445,638 178,556,237 83,718,259 94,837,978 $ 210,429,227 East Palo Alto $ 122,992,624 $ 39,840,827 $ 83,151,796 29,635,203 9,599,690 20,035,514 93,357,421 30,241,138 63,116,283 $ 90,200,979 Foster City $ 85,420,763 $ 46,781,427 $ 38,639,335 60,794,897 33,294,857 27,500,040 24,625,866 13,486,571 11,139,295 $ 34,582,391 Half Moon Bay $ 47,884,942 $ 11,322,477 $ 36,562,465 17,809,895 4,211,181 13,598,715 30,075,046 7,111,297 22,963,750 $ 41,319,058 Hillsborough $ 60,657,405 $ 34,633,279 $ 26,024,126 27,749,853 15,844,206 11,905,647 32,907,552 18,789,073 14,118,479 $ 30,751,347 Menlo Park $ 147,528,253 $ 37,658,212 $ 109,870,041 92,277,157 23,554,761 68,722,396 55,251,095 14,103,451 41,147,645 $ 68,677,273 Millbrae $ 83,350,308 $ 39,198,247 $ 44,152,061 30,735,134 14,454,216 16,280,918 52,615,174 24,744,031 27,871,143 $ 65,190,108 Pacifica $ 165,152,463 $ 47,738,250 $ 117,414,213 26,166,641 7,563,615 18,603,026 138,985,821 40,174,635 98,811,187 $ 114,335,327 Portola Valley $ 36,224,401 $ 18,914,472 $ 17,309,929 13,013,089 6,794,749 6,218,340 23,211,312 12,119,723 11,091,589 $ 27,992,708 Redwood City $ 232,586,000 $ 114,209,554 $ 118,376,445 139,119,713 68,313,658 70,806,055 93,466,286 45,895,896 47,570,390 $ 147,202,053 San Bruno $ 161,776,431 $ 73,937,574 $ 87,838,857 52,886,782 24,171,138 28,715,645 108,889,649 49,766,437 59,123,212 $ 131,634,860 San Carlos $ 114,056,914 $ 19,501,901 $ 94,555,013 112,478,599 19,232,034 93,246,565 1,578,315 269,867 1,308,448 $ 90,151,580 San Mateo $ 312,002,653 $ 96,400,425 $ 215,602,229 173,427,721 53,584,499 119,843,222 138,574,932 42,815,925 95,759,007 $ 183,099,012 So. San Francisco $ 229,733,398 $ 139,389,902 $ 90,343,496 100,328,358 60,873,866 39,454,492 129,405,040 78,516,036 50,889,003 $ 162,876,065 Woodside $ 46,830,395 $ 9,617,964 $ 37,212,431 44,739,291 9,188,496 35,550,795 2,091,103 429,468 1,661,635 $ 12,712,417 COUNTY TOTAL $ 2,632,378,854 $ 1,089,128,702 $ 1,543,250,151 1,754,480,489 690,626,355 1,063,854,134 $ 1,240,312,481 $ 533,825,274 $ 706,487,207 $ 1,586,338,694

Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall County of Santa Clara $ 608,232,296 $ 346,359,285 $ 261,873,010 405,772,481 231,068,077 174,704,405 202,459,814 115,291,209 87,168,606 $ 229,607,066 Campbell $ 149,099,035 $ 71,771,107 $ 77,327,928 51,227,886 24,659,329 26,568,558 97,871,148 47,111,778 50,759,370 $ 65,995,117 Cupertino $ 216,879,358 $ 76,726,929 $ 140,152,430 47,736,587 16,888,107 30,848,481 169,142,771 59,838,822 109,303,949 $ 204,801,994 Gilroy $ 192,768,828 $ 102,787,042 $ 89,981,785 24,645,571 13,141,364 11,504,207 168,123,257 89,645,678 78,477,579 $ 162,457,443 Los Altos $ 104,127,470 $ 18,966,973 $ 85,160,497 70,653,002 12,869,549 57,783,453 33,474,468 6,097,424 27,377,044 $ 56,641,443 Los Altos Hills $ 42,540,238 $ 21,072,462 $ 21,467,775 65,717,663 32,553,485 33,164,178 - - - $ 15,186,418 Los Gatos $ 146,925,152 $ 44,154,469 $ 102,770,683 26,826,342 8,061,948 18,764,395 120,098,809 36,092,521 84,006,288 $ 107,595,958 Milpitas $ 266,450,875 $ 144,922,270 $ 121,528,605 67,938,477 36,951,645 30,986,831 198,512,398 107,970,624 90,541,774 $ 220,512,341 Monte Sereno $ 20,171,008 $ 246,438 $ 19,924,570 3,370,425 41,178 3,329,246 16,800,584 205,260 16,595,323 $ 11,352,621 Morgan Hill $ 146,807,100 $ 73,297,097 $ 73,510,003 42,568,105 21,253,186 21,314,920 104,238,995 52,043,912 52,195,083 $ 146,633,589 Mountain View $ 241,167,650 $ 100,595,914 $ 140,571,736 179,140,013 74,722,930 104,417,083 62,027,637 25,872,985 36,154,653 $ 112,827,554 Palo Alto $ 158,744,359 $ 55,935,304 $ 102,809,055 92,841,658 32,713,770 60,127,888 65,902,701 23,221,535 42,681,166 $ 222,635,605 San Jose $ 4,085,067,234 $ 1,392,045,316 $ 2,693,021,918 2,310,410,355 787,305,503 1,523,104,852 1,774,656,879 604,739,813 1,169,917,066 $ 1,566,446,754 Santa Clara $ 370,034,271 $ 198,774,793 $ 171,259,478 124,367,298 66,807,552 57,559,746 245,666,974 131,967,241 113,699,733 $ 254,440,975 Saratoga $ 168,835,904 $ 60,914,394 $ 107,921,509 65,552,185 23,650,607 41,901,578 103,283,718 37,263,787 66,019,931 $ 57,991,998 Sunnyvale $ 482,109,590 $ 199,631,367 $ 282,478,223 228,824,795 94,751,500 134,073,295 253,284,795 104,879,868 148,404,928 $ 310,485,389 COUNTY TOTAL $ 7,399,960,368 $ 2,908,201,163 $ 4,491,759,205 3,807,592,843 1,496,392,600 2,311,200,243 $ 3,615,544,949 $ 1,442,242,457 $ 2,173,302,492 $ 3,745,612,265

Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall County of Solano $ 323,223,080 $ 296,225,550 $ 26,997,530 306,568,438 280,962,004 25,606,434 16,654,642 15,263,546 1,391,096 $ 317,558,126 Benicia $ 152,470,152 $ 45,630,586 $ 106,839,567 24,012,557 7,186,371 16,826,187 128,457,595 38,444,215 90,013,380 $ 105,512,359 Dixon $ 83,508,522 $ 30,585,255 $ 52,923,267 16,606,708 6,082,258 10,524,450 66,901,814 24,502,997 42,398,817 $ 70,323,497 Fairfield $ 492,371,632 $ 213,731,762 $ 278,639,870 152,096,311 66,022,919 86,073,392 340,275,321 147,708,843 192,566,479 $ 290,956,728 Rio Vista $ 50,734,020 $ 22,701,618 $ 28,032,402 6,910,986 3,092,413 3,818,572 43,823,034 19,609,205 24,213,829 $ 17,299,161 Suisun City $ 153,058,538 $ 94,901,059 $ 58,157,479 24,794,330 15,373,257 9,421,073 128,264,208 79,527,802 48,736,406 $ 138,658,136 Vacaville $ 374,035,276 $ 196,866,409 $ 177,168,867 75,205,606 39,583,052 35,622,555 298,829,670 157,283,357 141,546,312 $ 165,319,990 Vallejo $ 707,516,295 $ 267,684,611 $ 439,831,684 64,775,663 24,507,489 40,268,173 642,740,632 243,177,122 399,563,511 $ 737,831,121 COUNTY TOTAL $ 2,336,917,516 $ 1,168,326,851 $ 1,168,590,666 670,970,600 442,809,764 228,160,836 $ 1,665,946,917 $ 725,517,087 $ 940,429,829 $ 1,843,459,117

LSRWG 120309 - Page 87 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09:Attachment Item 05C(i) A

Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall County of Sonoma $ 2,076,638,307 $ 934,487,238 $ 1,142,151,069 417,719,581 187,973,811 229,745,769 1,658,918,726 746,513,427 912,405,299 $ 981,562,388 Cloverdale $ 44,980,411 $ 17,437,669 $ 27,542,741 43,248,474 16,766,245 26,482,229 1,731,937 671,424 1,060,513 $ - Cotati $ 39,020,352 $ 15,242,576 $ 23,777,776 2,439,549 952,964 1,486,584 36,580,803 14,289,611 22,291,192 $ 30,899,212 Healdsburg $ 62,762,832 $ 34,548,578 $ 28,214,253 21,418,794 11,790,241 9,628,554 41,344,037 22,758,338 18,585,700 $ 53,539,084 Petaluma $ 377,480,565 $ 191,614,207 $ 185,866,357 41,721,032 21,178,156 20,542,875 335,759,533 170,436,051 165,323,482 $ 231,259,288 Rohnert Park $ 184,851,109 $ 102,888,931 $ 81,962,179 52,210,604 29,060,649 23,149,955 132,640,506 73,828,282 58,812,224 $ 136,498,326 Santa Rosa $ 772,274,096 $ 392,885,455 $ 379,388,641 315,009,949 160,257,644 154,752,305 457,264,147 232,627,811 224,636,336 $ 585,879,650 Sebastopol $ 34,445,608 $ 17,591,504 $ 16,854,104 9,236,008 4,716,865 4,519,144 25,209,599 12,874,639 12,334,960 $ 29,185,606 Sonoma $ 48,819,106 $ 20,355,083 $ 28,464,022 40,374,938 16,834,295 23,540,643 8,444,168 3,520,788 4,923,380 $ - Windsor $ 107,505,336 $ 49,972,466 $ 57,532,870 16,355,248 7,602,526 8,752,722 91,150,088 42,369,940 48,780,147 $ 91,285,945 COUNTY TOTAL $ 3,748,777,720 $ 1,777,023,707 $ 1,971,754,012 959,734,176 457,133,396 502,600,780 $ 2,789,043,543 $ 1,319,890,311 $ 1,469,153,232 $ 2,140,109,499

Jurisdiction Total Need MTS Non-MTS Total Revenue MTS Non-MTS Total Shortfall MTS Non-MTS T2035 Shortfall Alameda $ 6,235,253,644 $ 3,302,452,135 $ 2,932,801,510 $ 2,972,161,282 $ 1,538,658,513 $ 1,433,502,769 $ 3,464,265,911 $ 1,878,347,954 $ 1,585,917,957 $ 3,766,374,278 Contra Costa $ 4,323,068,848 $ 2,038,307,380 $ 2,284,761,468 $ 3,020,741,883 $ 1,373,959,318 $ 1,646,782,565 $ 1,647,973,672 $ 818,667,341 $ 829,306,332 $ 1,904,258,714 Marin $ 1,132,250,206 $ 434,743,147 $ 697,507,059 $ 714,582,975 $ 275,553,964 $ 439,029,011 $ 442,834,323 $ 166,705,652 $ 276,128,671 $ 899,563,480 Napa $ 964,816,083 $ 427,532,336 $ 537,283,746 $ 295,046,580 $ 136,003,371 $ 159,043,209 $ 672,886,277 $ 292,745,555 $ 380,140,721 $ 880,645,494 San Francisco $ 4,142,150,095 $ 2,147,618,160 $ 1,994,531,935 $ 2,160,562,644 $ 1,120,206,526 $ 1,040,356,117 $ 1,981,587,451 $ 1,027,411,634 $ 954,175,817 $ 1,438,920,607 San Mateo $ 2,632,378,854 $ 1,089,128,702 $ 1,543,250,151 $ 1,754,480,489 $ 690,626,355 $ 1,063,854,134 $ 1,240,312,481 $ 533,825,274 $ 706,487,207 $ 1,586,338,694 Santa Clara $ 7,399,960,368 $ 2,908,201,163 $ 4,491,759,205 $ 3,807,592,843 $ 1,496,392,600 $ 2,311,200,243 $ 3,615,544,949 $ 1,442,242,457 $ 2,173,302,492 $ 3,745,612,265 Solano $ 2,336,917,516 $ 1,168,326,851 $ 1,168,590,666 $ 670,970,600 $ 442,809,764 $ 228,160,836 $ 1,665,946,917 $ 725,517,087 $ 940,429,829 $ 1,843,459,117 Sonoma $ 3,748,777,720 $ 1,777,023,707 $ 1,971,754,012 $ 959,734,176 $ 457,133,396 $ 502,600,780 $ 2,789,043,543 $ 1,319,890,311 $ 1,469,153,232 $ 2,140,109,499 Total $ 32,915,573,333 $ 15,293,333,582 $ 17,622,239,751 16,355,873,472 7,531,343,807 8,824,529,665 $ 17,520,395,524 $ 8,205,353,264 $ 9,315,042,259 $ 18,205,282,148

LSRWG 120309 - Page 88 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 05C(i) DRAFT 2009 LS&R 25-YEAR PAVEMENT SHORTFALLS In Escalated Dollars Jurisdiction Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Alameda $ 300,881,565 $ 171,494,296 $ 129,387,269 265,014,330 151,050,949 113,963,381 $ 35,867,234 $ 20,443,347 $ 15,423,888 Alameda $ 175,267,813 $ 99,203,607 $ 76,064,206 61,377,309 34,740,266 26,637,043 $ 113,890,503 $ 64,463,341 $ 49,427,163 Albany $ 30,799,241 $ 14,673,787 $ 16,125,454 32,710,509 15,584,379 17,126,130 $ (1,911,267) $ (910,591) $ (1,000,676) Berkeley $ 242,612,705 $ 105,821,785 $ 136,790,919 125,865,357 54,899,420 70,965,937 $ 116,747,347 $ 50,922,365 $ 65,824,982 Dublin $ 63,874,969 $ 38,147,379 $ 25,727,590 30,028,916 17,933,855 12,095,061 $ 33,846,053 $ 20,213,524 $ 13,632,529 Emeryville $ 19,070,202 $ 16,628,265 $ 2,441,937 4,255,130 3,710,261 544,869 $ 14,815,072 $ 12,918,004 $ 1,897,068 Fremont $ 498,062,267 $ 328,882,084 $ 169,180,183 143,202,935 94,560,224 48,642,711 $ 354,859,332 $ 234,321,860 $ 120,537,472 Hayward $ 242,861,877 $ 95,716,261 $ 147,145,616 137,125,957 54,043,821 83,082,136 $ 105,735,920 $ 41,672,440 $ 64,063,481 Livermore $ 207,343,522 $ 83,307,599 $ 124,035,923 82,136,175 33,001,116 49,135,060 $ 125,207,347 $ 50,306,484 $ 74,900,863 Newark $ 120,081,981 $ 91,453,425 $ 28,628,556 33,526,341 25,533,379 7,992,962 $ 86,555,640 $ 65,920,046 $ 20,635,594 Oakland $ 888,175,289 $ 416,581,459 $ 471,593,830 164,374,112 77,096,501 87,277,611 $ 723,801,177 $ 339,484,957 $ 384,316,219 Piedmont $ 20,377,083 $ 7,025,476 $ 13,351,607 25,871,069 8,919,656 16,951,412 $ (5,493,985) $ (1,894,180) $ (3,599,805) Pleasanton $ 172,266,559 $ 115,224,702 $ 57,041,857 97,917,402 65,494,449 32,422,952 $ 74,349,157 $ 49,730,252 $ 24,618,905 San Leandro $ 218,702,802 $ 97,047,351 $ 121,655,451 191,279,838 84,878,663 106,401,175 $ 27,422,964 $ 12,168,687 $ 15,254,277 Union City $ 107,651,648 $ 77,139,882 $ 30,511,766 48,235,457 34,564,055 13,671,402 $ 59,416,191 $ 42,575,827 $ 16,840,364 COUNTY TOTAL $ 3,308,029,522 $ 1,758,347,359 $ 1,549,682,163 1,442,920,838 756,010,997 686,909,841 $ 1,865,108,685 $ 1,002,336,363 $ 862,772,322

Jurisdiction Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Contra Costa $ 317,604,646 $ 160,313,863 $ 157,290,783 395,356,736 199,559,945 195,796,792 $ (77,752,090) $ (39,246,082) $ (38,506,009) Antioch $ 251,482,147 $ 102,757,114 $ 148,725,032 186,391,845 76,160,827 110,231,019 $ 65,090,301 $ 26,596,288 $ 38,494,014 Brentwood $ 90,206,558 $ 36,343,149 $ 53,863,409 291,412,518 117,406,636 174,005,882 $ (201,205,960) $ (81,063,487) $ (120,142,473) Clayton $ 30,147,778 $ 11,883,856 $ 18,263,921 7,737,692 3,050,096 4,687,596 $ 22,410,086 $ 8,833,760 $ 13,576,325 Concord $ 184,949,420 $ 75,347,139 $ 109,602,280 141,276,567 57,555,115 83,721,451 $ 43,672,853 $ 17,792,024 $ 25,880,829 Danville $ 97,604,774 $ 26,204,594 $ 71,400,180 88,365,312 23,724,015 64,641,297 $ 9,239,462 $ 2,480,579 $ 6,758,883 El Cerrito $ 57,675,467 $ 20,598,918 $ 37,076,549 37,852,492 13,519,100 24,333,392 $ 19,822,975 $ 7,079,818 $ 12,743,156 Hercules $ 46,222,891 $ 22,880,218 $ 23,342,673 22,673,669 11,223,411 11,450,258 $ 23,549,222 $ 11,656,807 $ 11,892,415 Lafayette $ 58,363,624 $ 26,740,120 $ 31,623,504 53,054,787 24,307,801 28,746,986 $ 5,308,837 $ 2,432,319 $ 2,876,518 Martinez $ 80,080,776 $ 33,037,382 $ 47,043,394 43,213,341 17,827,695 25,385,646 $ 36,867,436 $ 15,209,687 $ 21,657,748 Moraga $ 66,083,868 $ 42,426,916 $ 23,656,952 24,039,645 15,433,842 8,605,803 $ 42,044,222 $ 26,993,073 $ 15,051,149 Oakley $ 67,652,903 $ 31,998,215 $ 35,654,687 33,477,145 15,833,894 17,643,251 $ 34,175,758 $ 16,164,321 $ 18,011,436 Orinda $ 78,736,802 $ 30,139,390 $ 48,597,412 57,077,625 21,848,548 35,229,077 $ 21,659,177 $ 8,290,842 $ 13,368,335 Pinole $ 41,663,198 $ 16,444,518 $ 25,218,680 48,473,048 19,132,375 29,340,673 $ (6,809,850) $ (2,687,857) $ (4,121,993) Pittsburg $ 145,752,564 $ 69,424,743 $ 76,327,821 71,408,767 34,013,366 37,395,401 $ 74,343,797 $ 35,411,377 $ 38,932,420 Pleasant Hill $ 66,919,413 $ 19,905,052 $ 47,014,362 73,032,704 21,723,438 51,309,266 $ (6,113,291) $ (1,818,387) $ (4,294,904) Richmond $ 307,746,596 $ 202,608,829 $ 105,137,767 208,664,467 137,376,867 71,287,600 $ 99,082,129 $ 65,231,962 $ 33,850,167 San Pablo $ 24,200,536 $ 13,953,271 $ 10,247,265 113,736,509 65,576,908 48,159,601 $ (89,535,972) $ (51,623,637) $ (37,912,336) San Ramon $ 129,802,492 $ 57,097,440 $ 72,705,052 145,092,377 63,823,146 81,269,232 $ (15,289,885) $ (6,725,705) $ (8,564,180) Walnut Creek $ 243,644,241 $ 139,695,980 $ 103,948,262 111,250,479 63,786,628 47,463,851 $ 132,393,762 $ 75,909,351 $ 56,484,411 COUNTY TOTAL $ 2,386,540,693 $ 1,139,800,708 $ 1,246,739,986 2,153,587,726 1,002,883,653 1,150,704,073 $ 232,952,967 $ 136,917,055 $ 96,035,913

Jurisdiction Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Marin $ 253,961,513 $ 71,919,869 $ 182,041,643 145,965,680 41,336,313 104,629,367 $ 107,995,832 $ 30,583,556 $ 77,412,276 Belvedere $ 4,545,509 $ 868,909 $ 3,676,600 8,819,968 1,686,005 7,133,963 $ (4,274,459) $ (817,096) $ (3,457,363) Corte Madera $ 17,271,553 $ 5,476,145 $ 11,795,408 16,396,859 5,198,813 11,198,045 $ 874,695 $ 277,332 $ 597,363 Fairfax $ 15,673,568 $ 9,878,021 $ 5,795,546 15,897,387 10,019,080 5,878,307 $ (223,819) $ (141,058) $ (82,761) Larkspur $ 40,161,739 $ 4,964,675 $ 35,197,063 16,925,756 2,092,312 14,833,444 $ 23,235,983 $ 2,872,363 $ 20,363,619 Mill Valley $ 42,713,196 $ 21,165,596 $ 21,547,600 36,498,860 18,086,217 18,412,643 $ 6,214,336 $ 3,079,379 $ 3,134,957 Novato $ 108,910,253 $ 47,728,007 $ 61,182,246 95,353,764 41,787,113 53,566,651 $ 13,556,488 $ 5,940,893 $ 7,615,595 Ross $ 7,360,100 $ 2,938,525 $ 4,421,575 9,637,000 3,847,579 5,789,421 $ (2,276,899) $ (909,054) $ (1,367,846) San Anselmo $ 30,920,607 $ 16,937,903 $ 13,982,705 27,814,834 15,236,601 12,578,233 $ 3,105,773 $ 1,701,302 $ 1,404,471 San Rafael $ 98,897,245 $ 39,625,364 $ 59,271,881 65,174,985 26,113,796 39,061,189 $ 33,722,260 $ 13,511,568 $ 20,210,692 Sausalito $ 8,615,108 $ 8,605,294 $ 9,814 14,449,599 14,433,138 16,461 $ (5,834,491) $ (5,827,844) $ (6,647) Tiburon $ 20,904,781 $ 9,715,109 $ 11,189,673 23,175,345 10,770,311 12,405,034 $ (2,270,564) $ (1,055,202) $ (1,215,361) COUNTY TOTAL $ 649,935,172 $ 239,823,417 $ 410,111,755 476,110,037 190,607,278 285,502,759 $ 173,825,135 $ 49,216,139 $ 124,608,996

Jurisdiction Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Napa $ 251,808,372 $ 130,818,405 $ 120,989,967 103,590,163 53,816,717 49,773,446 $ 148,218,210 $ 77,001,688 $ 71,216,521 American Canyon $ 43,117,087 $ 19,311,531 $ 23,805,556 9,935,158 4,449,816 5,485,342 $ 33,181,929 $ 14,861,715 $ 18,320,214 Calistoga $ 10,294,479 $ 4,852,433 $ 5,442,045 12,323,360 5,808,772 6,514,588 $ (2,028,882) $ (956,339) $ (1,072,542) Napa $ 291,728,538 $ 106,869,209 $ 184,859,329 63,517,044 23,268,263 40,248,781 $ 228,211,494 $ 83,600,946 $ 144,610,547 St. Helena $ 30,650,148 $ 17,823,955 $ 12,826,193 1,866,993 1,085,711 781,282 $ 28,783,156 $ 16,738,245 $ 12,044,911 Yountville $ 5,774,564 $ 2,254,022 $ 3,520,542 12,744,587 4,974,675 7,769,911 $ (6,970,023) $ (2,720,653) $ (4,249,370) COUNTY TOTAL $ 633,373,188 $ 281,929,556 $ 351,443,632 203,977,305 93,403,954 110,573,351 $ 429,395,883 $ 188,525,602 $ 240,870,282 LSRWG 120309 - Page 89 of 118 TR 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 05C(i)

Jurisdiction Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS San Francisco $ 2,466,128,393 $ 1,278,635,974 $ 1,187,492,419 918,718,718 476,336,433 442,382,285 $ 1,547,409,675 $ 802,299,541 $ 745,110,134 COUNTY TOTAL $ 2,466,128,393 $ 1,278,635,974 $ 1,187,492,419 918,718,718 476,336,433 442,382,285 $ 1,547,409,675 $ 802,299,541 $ 745,110,134

Jurisdiction Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of San Mateo $ 135,416,671 $ 51,161,629 $ 84,255,043 348,192,388 131,550,196 216,642,192 $ (212,775,716) $ (80,388,567) $ (132,387,149) Atherton $ 19,380,858 $ 4,307,506 $ 15,073,352 35,492,388 7,888,385 27,604,003 $ (16,111,530) $ (3,580,879) $ (12,530,651) Belmont $ 54,672,152 $ 21,233,663 $ 33,438,490 32,640,127 12,676,827 19,963,299 $ 22,032,026 $ 8,556,835 $ 13,475,191 Brisbane $ 14,063,581 $ 8,978,822 $ 5,084,760 7,316,923 4,671,452 2,645,471 $ 6,746,658 $ 4,307,369 $ 2,439,289 Burlingame $ 40,670,648 $ 25,847,864 $ 14,822,785 48,824,885 31,030,215 17,794,670 $ (8,154,236) $ (5,182,351) $ (2,971,885) Colma $ 12,049,661 $ 12,049,661 $ - 4,761,299 4,761,299 - $ 7,288,362 $ 7,288,362 $ - Daly City $ 80,074,390 $ 37,543,850 $ 42,530,540 99,873,525 46,826,914 53,046,610 $ (19,799,134) $ (9,283,064) $ (10,516,070) East Palo Alto $ 57,236,900 $ 18,540,668 $ 38,696,232 20,717,777 6,711,080 14,006,697 $ 36,519,123 $ 11,829,588 $ 24,689,535 Foster City $ 25,106,031 $ 13,749,537 $ 11,356,493 30,042,311 16,452,934 13,589,376 $ (4,936,280) $ (2,703,397) $ (2,232,883) Half Moon Bay $ 21,704,753 $ 5,132,126 $ 16,572,626 13,554,877 3,205,074 10,349,803 $ 8,149,876 $ 1,927,052 $ 6,222,824 Hillsborough $ 38,070,847 $ 21,737,136 $ 16,333,711 24,467,415 13,970,047 10,497,368 $ 13,603,432 $ 7,767,089 $ 5,836,343 Menlo Park $ 84,367,159 $ 21,535,647 $ 62,831,512 71,069,585 18,141,295 52,928,291 $ 13,297,573 $ 3,394,352 $ 9,903,221 Millbrae $ 40,662,804 $ 19,123,032 $ 21,539,772 20,413,910 9,600,318 10,813,592 $ 20,248,894 $ 9,522,714 $ 10,726,180 Pacifica $ 85,876,519 $ 24,823,091 $ 61,053,427 13,686,901 3,956,276 9,730,625 $ 72,189,618 $ 20,866,816 $ 51,322,802 Portola Valley $ 26,965,796 $ 14,080,116 $ 12,885,679 6,577,484 3,434,415 3,143,069 $ 20,388,312 $ 10,645,701 $ 9,742,611 Redwood City $ 78,337,351 $ 38,466,950 $ 39,870,401 70,745,345 34,738,954 36,006,391 $ 7,592,007 $ 3,727,996 $ 3,864,011 San Bruno $ 74,936,617 $ 34,248,695 $ 40,687,921 44,613,614 20,390,006 24,223,608 $ 30,323,003 $ 13,858,689 $ 16,464,314 San Carlos $ 56,893,795 $ 9,727,925 $ 47,165,870 83,251,590 14,234,685 69,016,905 $ (26,357,795) $ (4,506,760) $ (21,851,036) San Mateo $ 120,612,546 $ 37,266,031 $ 83,346,515 151,313,586 46,751,827 104,561,760 $ (30,701,040) $ (9,485,795) $ (21,215,245) So. San Francisco $ 100,854,241 $ 61,192,943 $ 39,661,298 40,435,383 24,534,021 15,901,362 $ 60,418,857 $ 36,658,922 $ 23,759,936 Woodside $ 35,599,553 $ 7,311,389 $ 28,288,164 35,242,073 7,237,970 28,004,103 $ 357,480 $ 73,419 $ 284,061 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,203,552,874 $ 488,058,282 $ 715,494,592 1,203,233,386 462,764,191 740,469,194 $ 319,489 $ 25,294,091 $ (24,974,602)

Jurisdiction Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Santa Clara $ 431,396,033 $ 245,659,467 $ 185,736,566 234,993,143 133,817,388 101,175,755 $ 196,402,890 $ 111,842,079 $ 84,560,811 Campbell $ 68,980,679 $ 33,204,907 $ 35,775,771 24,698,488 11,888,996 12,809,492 $ 44,282,190 $ 21,315,911 $ 22,966,279 Cupertino $ 106,196,305 $ 37,569,810 $ 68,626,495 19,290,570 6,824,560 12,466,010 $ 86,905,735 $ 30,745,250 $ 56,160,485 Gilroy $ 90,672,433 $ 48,347,813 $ 42,324,620 17,005,420 9,067,528 7,937,891 $ 73,667,013 $ 39,280,284 $ 34,386,729 Los Altos $ 47,719,549 $ 8,692,187 $ 39,027,362 33,279,964 6,061,995 27,217,969 $ 14,439,585 $ 2,630,192 $ 11,809,393 Los Altos Hills $ 24,920,938 $ 12,344,678 $ 12,576,260 34,418,444 17,049,302 17,369,142 $ (9,497,506) $ (4,704,624) $ (4,792,881) Los Gatos $ 86,475,634 $ 25,987,965 $ 60,487,669 26,826,342 8,061,948 18,764,395 $ 59,649,292 $ 17,926,017 $ 41,723,274 Milpitas $ 126,081,215 $ 68,575,402 $ 57,505,813 34,795,843 18,925,412 15,870,431 $ 91,285,372 $ 49,649,990 $ 41,635,382 Monte Sereno $ 12,997,620 $ 158,798 $ 12,838,822 2,505,332 30,609 2,474,724 $ 10,492,288 $ 128,189 $ 10,364,099 Morgan Hill $ 67,889,924 $ 33,895,734 $ 33,994,191 39,685,954 19,814,200 19,871,754 $ 28,203,970 $ 14,081,534 $ 14,122,436 Mountain View $ 92,978,423 $ 38,783,185 $ 54,195,239 141,625,300 59,074,783 82,550,517 $ (48,646,876) $ (20,291,598) $ (28,355,278) Palo Alto $ 30,927,633 $ 10,897,688 $ 20,029,944 56,161,787 19,789,217 36,372,569 $ (25,234,154) $ (8,891,529) $ (16,342,625) San Jose $ 2,089,259,912 $ 711,945,314 $ 1,377,314,598 622,103,033 211,990,541 410,112,492 $ 1,467,156,879 $ 499,954,773 $ 967,202,106 Santa Clara $ 137,643,467 $ 73,939,237 $ 63,704,230 73,544,190 39,506,425 34,037,765 $ 64,099,277 $ 34,432,812 $ 29,666,465 Saratoga $ 106,043,489 $ 38,259,486 $ 67,784,003 58,327,978 21,044,182 37,283,796 $ 47,715,511 $ 17,215,304 $ 30,500,207 Sunnyvale $ 206,936,139 $ 85,687,871 $ 121,248,268 190,771,239 78,994,328 111,776,910 $ 16,164,900 $ 6,693,543 $ 9,471,357 COUNTY TOTAL $ 3,727,119,393 $ 1,473,949,542 $ 2,253,169,851 1,610,033,027 636,713,556 973,319,471 $ 2,117,086,366 $ 812,008,128 $ 1,305,078,238

Jurisdiction Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Solano $ 170,464,541 $ 156,226,321 $ 14,238,221 294,738,857 270,120,500 24,618,357 $ (124,274,316) $ (113,894,180) $ (10,380,136) Benicia $ 97,015,643 $ 29,034,408 $ 67,981,235 23,425,733 7,010,749 16,414,984 $ 73,589,910 $ 22,023,659 $ 51,566,251 Dixon $ 48,676,264 $ 17,827,832 $ 30,848,431 14,355,608 5,257,786 9,097,822 $ 34,320,656 $ 12,570,047 $ 21,750,609 Fairfield $ 281,391,973 $ 122,148,390 $ 159,243,583 95,023,709 41,248,487 53,775,222 $ 186,368,264 $ 80,899,903 $ 105,468,360 Rio Vista $ 34,436,813 $ 15,409,214 $ 19,027,599 5,823,262 2,605,697 3,217,565 $ 28,613,550 $ 12,803,517 $ 15,810,033 Suisun City $ 95,861,723 $ 59,437,252 $ 36,424,470 18,607,935 11,537,499 7,070,436 $ 77,253,788 $ 47,899,753 $ 29,354,034 Vacaville $ 182,857,258 $ 96,243,467 $ 86,613,791 66,082,411 34,781,230 31,301,181 $ 116,774,847 $ 61,462,237 $ 55,312,610 Vallejo $ 467,567,567 $ 176,901,427 $ 290,666,140 62,718,914 23,729,331 38,989,583 $ 404,848,653 $ 153,172,096 $ 251,676,556 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,378,271,782 $ 673,228,312 $ 705,043,469 580,776,430 396,291,278 184,485,151 $ 797,495,352 $ 276,937,034 $ 520,558,318

LSRWG 120309 - Page 90 of 118 TR 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 05C(i)

Jurisdiction Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Sonoma $ 1,716,917,172 $ 772,612,727 $ 944,304,444 246,546,300 110,945,835 135,600,465 $ 1,470,370,872 $ 661,666,892 $ 808,703,980 Cloverdale $ 27,943,863 $ 10,833,068 $ 17,110,795 26,295,087 10,193,883 16,101,204 $ 1,648,776 $ 639,185 $ 1,009,591 Cotati $ 24,334,630 $ 9,505,871 $ 14,828,759 1,334,775 521,405 813,370 $ 22,999,854 $ 8,984,466 $ 14,015,388 Healdsburg $ 39,409,183 $ 21,693,273 $ 17,715,910 14,091,552 7,756,870 6,334,683 $ 25,317,631 $ 13,936,404 $ 11,381,227 Petaluma $ 263,033,415 $ 133,519,296 $ 129,514,119 38,052,188 19,315,802 18,736,386 $ 224,981,228 $ 114,203,494 $ 110,777,733 Rohnert Park $ 99,579,173 $ 55,426,200 $ 44,152,973 39,242,855 21,842,743 17,400,111 $ 60,336,318 $ 33,583,457 $ 26,752,861 Santa Rosa $ 452,165,386 $ 230,033,876 $ 222,131,510 251,454,790 127,924,697 123,530,093 $ 200,710,596 $ 102,109,179 $ 98,601,417 Sebastopol $ 19,115,688 $ 9,762,455 $ 9,353,233 9,236,008 4,716,865 4,519,144 $ 9,879,679 $ 5,045,590 $ 4,834,089 Sonoma $ 29,057,106 $ 12,115,335 $ 16,941,771 38,894,173 16,216,891 22,677,282 $ (9,837,067) $ (4,101,556) $ (5,735,511) Windsor $ 54,629,599 $ 25,393,863 $ 29,235,736 10,946,938 5,088,543 5,858,395 $ 43,682,661 $ 20,305,320 $ 23,377,340 COUNTY TOTAL $ 2,726,185,214 $ 1,280,895,964 $ 1,445,289,249 676,094,666 324,523,533 351,571,133 $ 2,050,090,547 $ 956,372,431 $ 1,093,718,116

Region Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS Alameda $ 3,308,029,522 $ 1,758,347,359 $ 1,549,682,163 $ 1,442,920,838 $ 756,010,997 $ 686,909,841 $ 1,865,108,685 $ 1,002,336,363 $ 862,772,322 Contra Costa $ 2,386,540,693 $ 1,139,800,708 $ 1,246,739,986 $ 2,153,587,726 $ 1,002,883,653 $ 1,150,704,073 $ 232,952,967 $ 136,917,055 $ 96,035,913 Marin $ 649,935,172 $ 239,823,417 $ 410,111,755 $ 476,110,037 $ 190,607,278 $ 285,502,759 $ 173,825,135 $ 49,216,139 $ 124,608,996 Napa $ 633,373,188 $ 281,929,556 $ 351,443,632 $ 203,977,305 $ 93,403,954 $ 110,573,351 $ 429,395,883 $ 188,525,602 $ 240,870,282 San Francisco $ 2,466,128,393 $ 1,278,635,974 $ 1,187,492,419 $ 918,718,718 $ 476,336,433 $ 442,382,285 $ 1,547,409,675 $ 802,299,541 $ 745,110,134 San Mateo $ 1,203,552,874 $ 488,058,282 $ 715,494,592 $ 1,203,233,386 $ 462,764,191 $ 740,469,194 $ 319,489 $ 25,294,091 $ (24,974,602) Santa Clara $ 3,727,119,393 $ 1,473,949,542 $ 2,253,169,851 $ 1,610,033,027 $ 636,713,556 $ 973,319,471 $ 2,117,086,366 $ 812,008,128 $ 1,305,078,238 Solano $ 1,378,271,782 $ 673,228,312 $ 705,043,469 $ 580,776,430 $ 396,291,278 $ 184,485,151 $ 797,495,352 $ 276,937,034 $ 520,558,318 Sonoma $ 2,726,185,214 $ 1,280,895,964 $ 1,445,289,249 $ 676,094,666 $ 324,523,533 $ 351,571,133 $ 2,050,090,547 $ 956,372,431 $ 1,093,718,116 Total $ 18,479,136,231 $ 8,614,669,115 $ 9,864,467,116 9,265,452,133 4,339,534,875 4,925,917,258 $ 9,213,684,099 $ 4,249,906,382 $ 4,963,777,716

LSRWG 120309 - Page 91 of 118 TR 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 05C(i) DRAFT 2009 LS&R 25-YEAR NON-PAVEMENT SHORTFALLS In Escalated Dollars Jurisdiction Non-Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Alameda $ 123,495,922 $ 70,389,311 $ 53,106,610 $ 360,052,198 $ 205,219,945 $ 154,832,253 $ (236,556,277) $ (134,830,634) $ (101,725,643) Alameda $ 148,032,637 $ 83,788,183 $ 64,244,454 $ 53,075,508 $ 30,041,351 $ 23,034,157 $ 94,957,129 $ 53,746,832 $ 41,210,297 Albany $ 33,466,559 $ 15,944,586 $ 17,521,973 $ 18,529,001 $ 8,827,835 $ 9,701,166 $ 14,937,558 $ 7,116,752 $ 7,820,807 Berkeley $ 212,442,484 $ 92,662,266 $ 119,780,218 $ 117,619,015 $ 51,302,565 $ 66,316,449 $ 94,823,469 $ 41,359,700 $ 53,463,768 Dublin $ 94,988,418 $ 56,728,939 $ 38,259,479 $ 1,927,896 $ 1,151,377 $ 776,519 $ 93,060,523 $ 55,577,562 $ 37,482,960 Emeryville $ 19,993,910 $ 17,433,693 $ 2,560,218 $ 3,870,242 $ 3,374,658 $ 495,584 $ 16,123,669 $ 14,059,035 $ 2,064,634 Fremont $ 427,422,115 $ 282,236,751 $ 145,185,364 $ 33,841,063 $ 22,346,040 $ 11,495,023 $ 393,581,052 $ 259,890,711 $ 133,690,341 Hayward $ 299,062,280 $ 117,865,857 $ 181,196,423 $ 31,653,511 $ 12,475,221 $ 19,178,289 $ 267,408,769 $ 105,390,635 $ 162,018,134 Livermore $ 167,310,993 $ 67,223,114 $ 100,087,879 $ 15,545,103 $ 6,245,795 $ 9,299,308 $ 151,765,890 $ 60,977,318 $ 90,788,571 Newark $ 87,283,815 $ 66,474,619 $ 20,809,197 $ 17,464,919 $ 13,301,135 $ 4,163,784 $ 69,818,897 $ 53,173,484 $ 16,645,413 Oakland $ 842,546,993 $ 395,180,388 $ 447,366,605 $ 719,956,724 $ 337,681,791 $ 382,274,933 $ 122,590,269 $ 57,498,597 $ 65,091,672 Piedmont $ 22,130,664 $ 7,630,064 $ 14,500,600 $ 17,121,185 $ 5,902,929 $ 11,218,256 $ 5,009,479 $ 1,727,135 $ 3,282,344 Pleasanton $ 138,942,514 $ 92,935,099 $ 46,007,415 $ 65,769,855 $ 43,991,776 $ 21,778,079 $ 73,172,659 $ 48,943,323 $ 24,229,336 San Leandro $ 163,471,575 $ 72,539,003 $ 90,932,572 $ 41,752,768 $ 18,527,406 $ 23,225,363 $ 121,718,807 $ 54,011,598 $ 67,707,209 Union City $ 146,633,242 $ 105,072,902 $ 41,560,340 $ 31,061,457 $ 22,257,691 $ 8,803,766 $ 115,571,785 $ 82,815,211 $ 32,756,575 COUNTY TOTAL $ 2,927,224,122 $ 1,544,104,775 $ 1,383,119,347 $ 1,529,240,444 $ 782,647,516 $ 746,592,928 $ 1,397,983,678 $ 761,457,259 $ 636,526,419

Jurisdiction Non-Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Contra Costa $ 172,170,117 $ 86,904,448 $ 85,265,669 $ 29,428,488 $ 14,854,299 $ 14,574,188 $ 142,741,630 $ 72,050,149 $ 70,691,481 Antioch $ 200,111,551 $ 81,766,781 $ 118,344,770 $ 69,572,921 $ 28,427,913 $ 41,145,008 $ 130,538,630 $ 53,338,868 $ 77,199,763 Brentwood $ 102,889,254 $ 41,452,856 $ 61,436,398 $ 94,610,298 $ 38,117,363 $ 56,492,935 $ 8,278,956 $ 3,335,493 $ 4,943,463 Clayton $ 21,534,038 $ 8,488,434 $ 13,045,604 $ 1,610,441 $ 634,815 $ 975,627 $ 19,923,597 $ 7,853,619 $ 12,069,978 Concord $ 246,973,455 $ 100,615,311 $ 146,358,144 $ 120,812,940 $ 49,218,373 $ 71,594,568 $ 126,160,515 $ 51,396,938 $ 74,763,577 Danville $ 85,317,526 $ 22,905,756 $ 62,411,770 $ 131,760,513 $ 35,374,609 $ 96,385,903 $ (46,442,987) $ (12,468,853) $ (33,974,133) El Cerrito $ 46,461,511 $ 16,593,829 $ 29,867,682 $ 3,720,000 $ 1,328,606 $ 2,391,394 $ 42,741,511 $ 15,265,223 $ 27,476,288 Hercules $ 48,522,943 $ 24,018,738 $ 24,504,205 $ 5,032,927 $ 2,491,286 $ 2,541,640 $ 43,490,016 $ 21,527,452 $ 21,962,564 Lafayette $ 47,743,960 $ 21,874,571 $ 25,869,389 $ 47,459,145 $ 21,744,079 $ 25,715,066 $ 284,814 $ 130,492 $ 154,323 Martinez $ 72,047,056 $ 29,723,065 $ 42,323,991 $ 1,501,608 $ 619,489 $ 882,118 $ 70,545,448 $ 29,103,576 $ 41,441,873 Moraga $ 32,118,700 $ 20,620,726 $ 11,497,973 $ 3,291,930 $ 2,113,472 $ 1,178,457 $ 28,826,770 $ 18,507,254 $ 10,319,516 Oakley $ 68,320,621 $ 32,314,030 $ 36,006,591 $ 4,593,835 $ 2,172,775 $ 2,421,060 $ 63,726,786 $ 30,141,256 $ 33,585,531 Orinda $ 35,022,544 $ 13,406,159 $ 21,616,385 $ 28,394,782 $ 10,869,141 $ 17,525,641 $ 6,627,763 $ 2,537,018 $ 4,090,744 Pinole $ 38,419,943 $ 15,164,401 $ 23,255,542 $ 8,146,160 $ 3,215,300 $ 4,930,860 $ 30,273,783 $ 11,949,101 $ 18,324,682 Pittsburg $ 126,403,456 $ 60,208,392 $ 66,195,064 $ 121,125,016 $ 57,694,169 $ 63,430,847 $ 5,278,440 $ 2,514,222 $ 2,764,218 Pleasant Hill $ 66,495,064 $ 19,778,830 $ 46,716,234 $ 18,333,278 $ 5,453,198 $ 12,880,079 $ 48,161,787 $ 14,325,631 $ 33,836,155 Richmond $ 207,160,064 $ 136,386,424 $ 70,773,639 $ 16,274,710 $ 10,714,659 $ 5,560,051 $ 190,885,353 $ 125,671,765 $ 65,213,588 San Pablo $ 63,048,112 $ 36,351,566 $ 26,696,546 $ 89,028,318 $ 51,330,939 $ 37,697,379 $ (25,980,206) $ (14,979,373) $ (11,000,833) San Ramon $ 125,224,079 $ 55,083,491 $ 70,140,588 $ 51,263,561 $ 22,549,784 $ 28,713,777 $ 73,960,518 $ 32,533,707 $ 41,426,811 Walnut Creek $ 130,544,160 $ 74,848,862 $ 55,695,298 $ 21,193,287 $ 12,151,394 $ 9,041,894 $ 109,350,872 $ 62,697,469 $ 46,653,404 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,936,528,154 $ 898,506,672 $ 1,038,021,482 $ 867,154,157 $ 371,075,665 $ 496,078,492 $ 1,069,373,997 $ 527,431,008 $ 541,942,990

Jurisdiction Non-Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Marin $ 108,890,551 $ 30,836,933 $ 78,053,618 $ 95,949,323 $ 27,172,081 $ 68,777,242 $ 12,941,228 $ 3,664,852 $ 9,276,375 Belvedere $ 4,277,472 $ 817,672 $ 3,459,800 $ 4,276,409 $ 817,469 $ 3,458,941 $ 1,063 $ 203 $ 859 Corte Madera $ 19,304,123 $ 6,120,595 $ 13,183,528 $ 40,160,130 $ 12,733,233 $ 27,426,897 $ (20,856,007) $ (6,612,638) $ (14,243,369) Fairfax $ 14,735,276 $ 9,286,678 $ 5,448,598 $ 6,265,465 $ 3,948,712 $ 2,316,754 $ 8,469,811 $ 5,337,966 $ 3,131,845 Larkspur $ 24,291,204 $ 3,002,807 $ 21,288,397 $ - $ - $ - $ 24,291,204 $ 3,002,807 $ 21,288,397 Mill Valley $ 27,761,942 $ 13,756,827 $ 14,005,115 $ 8,513,875 $ 4,218,866 $ 4,295,009 $ 19,248,067 $ 9,537,962 $ 9,710,106 Novato $ 104,897,168 $ 45,969,343 $ 58,927,825 $ 56,092,820 $ 24,581,694 $ 31,511,126 $ 48,804,348 $ 21,387,649 $ 27,416,699 Ross $ 4,759,133 $ 1,900,087 $ 2,859,046 $ 3,394,617 $ 1,355,303 $ 2,039,314 $ 1,364,517 $ 544,784 $ 819,733 San Anselmo $ 25,062,259 $ 13,728,776 $ 11,333,483 $ - $ - $ - $ 25,062,259 $ 13,728,776 $ 11,333,483 San Rafael $ 115,684,009 $ 46,351,351 $ 69,332,657 $ 14,841,116 $ 5,946,421 $ 8,894,695 $ 100,842,893 $ 40,404,931 $ 60,437,962 Sausalito $ 14,929,526 $ 14,912,519 $ 17,008 $ - $ - $ - $ 14,929,526 $ 14,912,519 $ 17,008 Tiburon $ 17,722,371 $ 8,236,142 $ 9,486,228 $ 8,979,182 $ 4,172,908 $ 4,806,274 $ 8,743,188 $ 4,063,234 $ 4,679,954 COUNTY TOTAL $ 482,315,034 $ 194,919,730 $ 287,395,304 $ 238,472,937 $ 84,946,685 $ 153,526,252 $ 243,842,096 $ 109,973,045 $ 133,869,051

Jurisdiction Non-Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Napa $ 115,610,941 $ 60,061,700 $ 55,549,241 $ 57,360,520 $ 29,799,691 $ 27,560,829 $ 58,250,421 $ 30,262,009 $ 27,988,412 American Canyon $ 32,711,362 $ 14,650,955 $ 18,060,407 $ 2,290,231 $ 1,025,762 $ 1,264,469 $ 30,421,130 $ 13,625,193 $ 16,795,938 Calistoga $ 10,566,822 $ 4,980,806 $ 5,586,016 $ 1,412,407 $ 665,756 $ 746,651 $ 9,154,415 $ 4,315,050 $ 4,839,365 Napa $ 154,272,434 $ 56,514,776 $ 97,757,658 $ 27,144,061 $ 9,943,711 $ 17,200,350 $ 127,128,374 $ 46,571,065 $ 80,557,309 St. Helena $ 11,813,592 $ 6,869,949 $ 4,943,644 $ 247,562 $ 143,964 $ 103,597 $ 11,566,031 $ 6,725,984 $ 4,840,046 Yountville $ 6,467,744 $ 2,524,595 $ 3,943,148 $ 2,614,495 $ 1,020,532 $ 1,593,963 $ 3,853,249 $ 1,504,063 $ 2,349,186 COUNTY TOTAL $ 331,442,895 $ 145,602,780 $ 185,840,114 $ 91,069,276 $ 42,599,417 $ 48,469,858 $ 240,373,619 $ 103,003,363 $ 137,370,256 LSRWG 120309 - Page 92 of 118 TR 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 05C(i)

Jurisdiction Non-Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS San Francisco $ 1,676,021,702 $ 868,982,186 $ 807,039,516 $ 1,241,843,926 $ 643,870,093 $ 597,973,833 $ 434,177,776 $ 225,112,093 $ 209,065,683 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,676,021,702 $ 868,982,186 $ 807,039,516 $ 1,241,843,926 $ 643,870,093 $ 597,973,833 $ 434,177,776 $ 225,112,093 $ 209,065,683

Jurisdiction Non-Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of San Mateo $ 82,110,146 $ 31,021,947 $ 51,088,199 $ 221,460,331 $ 83,669,692 $ 137,790,639 $ (139,350,185) $ (52,647,745) $ (86,702,440) Atherton $ 14,802,669 $ 3,289,977 $ 11,512,692 $ 8,979,355 $ 1,995,713 $ 6,983,642 $ 5,823,314 $ 1,294,265 $ 4,529,050 Belmont $ 52,031,342 $ 20,208,020 $ 31,823,322 $ 2,157,982 $ 838,121 $ 1,319,861 $ 49,873,360 $ 19,369,899 $ 30,503,460 Brisbane $ 7,805,692 $ 4,983,504 $ 2,822,188 $ 3,300,438 $ 2,107,148 $ 1,193,290 $ 4,505,254 $ 2,876,357 $ 1,628,898 Burlingame $ 57,601,173 $ 36,607,906 $ 20,993,268 $ 2,716,512 $ 1,726,455 $ 990,057 $ 54,884,661 $ 34,881,451 $ 20,003,210 Colma $ 3,217,024 $ 3,217,024 $ - $ 3,671,478 $ 3,671,478 $ - $ (454,454) $ (454,454) $ - Daly City $ 212,285,894 $ 99,532,819 $ 112,753,076 $ 13,930,523 $ 6,531,495 $ 7,399,028 $ 198,355,371 $ 93,001,324 $ 105,354,047 East Palo Alto $ 65,755,724 $ 21,300,159 $ 44,455,565 $ 8,917,426 $ 2,888,609 $ 6,028,817 $ 56,838,298 $ 18,411,550 $ 38,426,748 Foster City $ 60,314,732 $ 33,031,890 $ 27,282,842 $ 30,752,586 $ 16,841,923 $ 13,910,663 $ 29,562,146 $ 16,189,968 $ 13,372,178 Half Moon Bay $ 26,180,189 $ 6,190,351 $ 19,989,838 $ 4,255,019 $ 1,006,107 $ 3,248,912 $ 21,925,170 $ 5,184,244 $ 16,740,926 Hillsborough $ 22,586,558 $ 12,896,143 $ 9,690,415 $ 3,282,439 $ 1,874,159 $ 1,408,280 $ 19,304,119 $ 11,021,984 $ 8,282,135 Menlo Park $ 63,161,094 $ 16,122,565 $ 47,038,529 $ 21,207,572 $ 5,413,466 $ 15,794,106 $ 41,953,522 $ 10,709,099 $ 31,244,423 Millbrae $ 42,687,504 $ 20,075,215 $ 22,612,290 $ 10,321,224 $ 4,853,898 $ 5,467,326 $ 32,366,281 $ 15,221,317 $ 17,144,964 Pacifica $ 79,275,944 $ 22,915,158 $ 56,360,786 $ 12,479,740 $ 3,607,339 $ 8,872,401 $ 66,796,204 $ 19,307,819 $ 47,488,385 Portola Valley $ 9,258,606 $ 4,834,356 $ 4,424,250 $ 6,435,606 $ 3,360,334 $ 3,075,272 $ 2,823,000 $ 1,474,022 $ 1,348,978 Redwood City $ 154,248,648 $ 75,742,604 $ 78,506,044 $ 68,374,369 $ 33,574,704 $ 34,799,664 $ 85,874,280 $ 42,167,900 $ 43,706,380 San Bruno $ 86,839,815 $ 39,688,879 $ 47,150,935 $ 8,273,169 $ 3,781,132 $ 4,492,037 $ 78,566,646 $ 35,907,747 $ 42,658,899 San Carlos $ 57,163,119 $ 9,773,975 $ 47,389,144 $ 29,227,009 $ 4,997,349 $ 24,229,660 $ 27,936,110 $ 4,776,626 $ 23,159,484 San Mateo $ 191,390,107 $ 59,134,393 $ 132,255,714 $ 22,114,135 $ 6,832,673 $ 15,281,462 $ 169,275,972 $ 52,301,721 $ 116,974,252 So. San Francisco $ 128,879,157 $ 78,196,959 $ 50,682,198 $ 59,892,975 $ 36,339,844 $ 23,553,130 $ 68,986,182 $ 41,857,115 $ 27,129,068 Woodside $ 11,230,841 $ 2,306,575 $ 8,924,266 $ 9,497,218 $ 1,950,526 $ 7,546,692 $ 1,733,623 $ 356,049 $ 1,377,574 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,428,825,979 $ 601,070,420 $ 827,755,559 $ 551,247,103 $ 227,862,163 $ 323,384,940 $ 877,578,876 $ 373,208,257 $ 504,370,619

Jurisdiction Non-Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Santa Clara $ 176,836,262 $ 100,699,818 $ 76,136,444 $ 170,779,338 $ 97,250,688 $ 73,528,650 $ 6,056,924 $ 3,449,130 $ 2,607,795 Campbell $ 80,118,356 $ 38,566,199 $ 41,552,157 $ 26,529,398 $ 12,770,333 $ 13,759,066 $ 53,588,958 $ 25,795,867 $ 27,793,091 Cupertino $ 110,683,053 $ 39,157,118 $ 71,525,935 $ 28,446,017 $ 10,063,546 $ 18,382,470 $ 82,237,036 $ 29,093,572 $ 53,143,464 Gilroy $ 102,096,395 $ 54,439,230 $ 47,657,165 $ 7,640,151 $ 4,073,836 $ 3,566,316 $ 94,456,244 $ 50,365,394 $ 44,090,850 Los Altos $ 56,407,921 $ 10,274,787 $ 46,133,135 $ 37,373,038 $ 6,807,554 $ 30,565,484 $ 19,034,883 $ 3,467,232 $ 15,567,651 Los Altos Hills $ 17,619,299 $ 8,727,784 $ 8,891,515 $ 31,299,219 $ 15,504,183 $ 15,795,036 $ (13,679,919) $ (6,776,398) $ (6,903,521) Los Gatos $ 60,449,518 $ 18,166,504 $ 42,283,014 $ - $ - $ - $ 60,449,518 $ 18,166,504 $ 42,283,014 Milpitas $ 140,369,659 $ 76,346,868 $ 64,022,792 $ 33,142,633 $ 18,026,233 $ 15,116,400 $ 107,227,026 $ 58,320,634 $ 48,906,392 Monte Sereno $ 7,173,388 $ 87,641 $ 7,085,747 $ 865,092 $ 10,569 $ 854,523 $ 6,308,296 $ 77,071 $ 6,231,224 Morgan Hill $ 78,917,176 $ 39,401,363 $ 39,515,812 $ 2,882,151 $ 1,438,986 $ 1,443,166 $ 76,035,024 $ 37,962,378 $ 38,072,647 Mountain View $ 148,189,227 $ 61,812,730 $ 86,376,497 $ 37,514,713 $ 15,648,147 $ 21,866,566 $ 110,674,514 $ 46,164,583 $ 64,509,931 Palo Alto $ 127,816,726 $ 45,037,616 $ 82,779,110 $ 36,679,871 $ 12,924,552 $ 23,755,319 $ 91,136,855 $ 32,113,064 $ 59,023,791 San Jose $ 1,995,807,322 $ 680,100,002 $ 1,315,707,320 $ 1,688,307,322 $ 575,314,962 $ 1,112,992,360 $ 307,500,000 $ 104,785,040 $ 202,714,960 Santa Clara $ 232,390,805 $ 124,835,556 $ 107,555,248 $ 50,823,108 $ 27,301,127 $ 23,521,981 $ 181,567,697 $ 97,534,429 $ 84,033,268 Saratoga $ 62,792,415 $ 22,654,908 $ 40,137,507 $ 7,224,208 $ 2,606,426 $ 4,617,782 $ 55,568,207 $ 20,048,483 $ 35,519,725 Sunnyvale $ 275,173,452 $ 113,943,497 $ 161,229,955 $ 38,053,557 $ 15,757,172 $ 22,296,385 $ 237,119,895 $ 98,186,325 $ 138,933,570 COUNTY TOTAL $ 3,672,840,975 $ 1,434,251,621 $ 2,238,589,354 $ 2,197,559,817 $ 858,151,428 $ 1,339,408,388 $ 1,475,281,159 $ 618,753,307 $ 856,527,852

Jurisdiction Non-Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Solano $ 152,758,539 $ 139,999,230 $ 12,759,309 $ 11,829,581 $ 10,841,504 $ 988,078 $ 140,928,958 $ 129,157,726 $ 11,771,232 Benicia $ 55,454,509 $ 16,596,178 $ 38,858,331 $ 586,824 $ 175,622 $ 411,202 $ 54,867,685 $ 16,420,555 $ 38,447,129 Dixon $ 34,832,258 $ 12,757,423 $ 22,074,836 $ 2,251,100 $ 824,472 $ 1,426,628 $ 32,581,158 $ 11,932,950 $ 20,648,208 Fairfield $ 210,979,660 $ 91,583,372 $ 119,396,287 $ 57,072,602 $ 24,774,432 $ 32,298,169 $ 153,907,058 $ 66,808,940 $ 87,098,118 Rio Vista $ 16,297,207 $ 7,292,404 $ 9,004,803 $ 1,087,723 $ 486,716 $ 601,007 $ 15,209,484 $ 6,805,688 $ 8,403,796 Suisun City $ 57,196,816 $ 35,463,806 $ 21,733,009 $ 6,186,395 $ 3,835,757 $ 2,350,637 $ 51,010,421 $ 31,628,049 $ 19,382,372 Vacaville $ 191,178,017 $ 100,622,942 $ 90,555,076 $ 9,123,195 $ 4,801,822 $ 4,321,374 $ 182,054,822 $ 95,821,120 $ 86,233,702 Vallejo $ 239,948,729 $ 90,783,184 $ 149,165,545 $ 2,056,749 $ 778,159 $ 1,278,590 $ 237,891,980 $ 90,005,025 $ 147,886,954 COUNTY TOTAL $ 958,645,735 $ 495,098,539 $ 463,547,196 $ 90,194,170 $ 46,518,485 $ 43,675,685 $ 868,451,565 $ 448,580,053 $ 419,871,511

LSRWG 120309 - Page 93 of 118 TR 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 05C(i)

Jurisdiction 2009 Non-Pave Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS County of Sonoma $ 359,721,135 $ 161,874,511 $ 197,846,624 $ 171,173,281 $ 77,027,976 $ 94,145,304 $ 188,547,854 $ 84,846,534 $ 103,701,320 Cloverdale $ 17,036,548 $ 6,604,602 $ 10,431,946 $ 16,953,387 $ 6,572,362 $ 10,381,025 $ 83,161 $ 32,239 $ 50,922 Cotati $ 14,685,722 $ 5,736,705 $ 8,949,018 $ 1,104,773 $ 431,559 $ 673,214 $ 13,580,949 $ 5,305,146 $ 8,275,804 Healdsburg $ 23,353,649 $ 12,855,305 $ 10,498,343 $ 7,327,242 $ 4,033,371 $ 3,293,871 $ 16,026,407 $ 8,821,934 $ 7,204,472 Petaluma $ 114,447,149 $ 58,094,911 $ 56,352,238 $ 3,668,844 $ 1,862,355 $ 1,806,490 $ 110,778,305 $ 56,232,556 $ 54,545,749 Rohnert Park $ 85,271,937 $ 47,462,731 $ 37,809,206 $ 12,967,749 $ 7,217,905 $ 5,749,844 $ 72,304,188 $ 40,244,825 $ 32,059,363 Santa Rosa $ 320,108,710 $ 162,851,579 $ 157,257,131 $ 63,555,159 $ 32,332,947 $ 31,222,212 $ 256,553,551 $ 130,518,632 $ 126,034,919 Sebastopol $ 15,329,920 $ 7,829,049 $ 7,500,871 $ - $ - $ - $ 15,329,920 $ 7,829,049 $ 7,500,871 Sonoma $ 19,761,999 $ 8,239,748 $ 11,522,251 $ 1,480,764 $ 617,403 $ 863,361 $ 18,281,235 $ 7,622,345 $ 10,658,890 Windsor $ 52,875,737 $ 24,578,603 $ 28,297,134 $ 5,408,310 $ 2,513,983 $ 2,894,327 $ 47,467,427 $ 22,064,620 $ 25,402,807 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,022,592,506 $ 496,127,743 $ 526,464,763 $ 283,639,510 $ 132,609,863 $ 151,029,647 $ 738,952,996 $ 363,517,880 $ 375,435,116

Region Non-Pavement Need MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Revenue MTS Non-MTS Non-Pavement Shortfall MTS Non-MTS Alameda $ 2,927,224,122 $ 1,544,104,775 $ 1,383,119,347 $ 1,529,240,444 $ 782,647,516 $ 746,592,928 $ 1,397,983,678 $ 761,457,259 $ 636,526,419 Contra Costa $ 1,936,528,154 $ 898,506,672 $ 1,038,021,482 $ 867,154,157 $ 371,075,665 $ 496,078,492 $ 1,069,373,997 $ 527,431,008 $ 541,942,990 Marin $ 482,315,034 $ 194,919,730 $ 287,395,304 $ 238,472,937 $ 84,946,685 $ 153,526,252 $ 243,842,096 $ 109,973,045 $ 133,869,051 Napa $ 331,442,895 $ 145,602,780 $ 185,840,114 $ 91,069,276 $ 42,599,417 $ 48,469,858 $ 240,373,619 $ 103,003,363 $ 137,370,256 San Francisco $ 1,676,021,702 $ 868,982,186 $ 807,039,516 $ 1,241,843,926 $ 643,870,093 $ 597,973,833 $ 434,177,776 $ 225,112,093 $ 209,065,683 San Mateo $ 1,428,825,979 $ 601,070,420 $ 827,755,559 $ 551,247,103 $ 227,862,163 $ 323,384,940 $ 877,578,876 $ 373,208,257 $ 504,370,619 Santa Clara $ 3,672,840,975 $ 1,434,251,621 $ 2,238,589,354 $ 2,197,559,817 $ 858,151,428 $ 1,339,408,388 $ 1,475,281,159 $ 618,753,307 $ 856,527,852 Solano $ 958,645,735 $ 495,098,539 $ 463,547,196 $ 90,194,170 $ 46,518,485 $ 43,675,685 $ 868,451,565 $ 448,580,053 $ 419,871,511 Sonoma $ 1,022,592,506 $ 496,127,743 $ 526,464,763 $ 283,639,510 $ 132,609,863 $ 151,029,647 $ 738,952,996 $ 363,517,880 $ 375,435,116 Total $ 14,436,437,102 $ 6,678,664,467 $ 7,757,772,635 $ 7,090,421,340 $ 3,190,281,316 $ 3,900,140,023 $ 7,346,015,762 $ 3,531,036,264 $ 3,814,979,498

LSRWG 120309 - Page 94 of 118 TR 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 5C(ii) DRAFT LSR STP Cycle 1 Funding Distribution -- Assumes $79 Million Funding Level Attachment B

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share County of Alameda $ - $ 380,943 $ 474,037 $ 317,487 $ 1,172,467 Alameda $ 282,675 $ 205,107 $ 149,298 $ 248,584 $ 885,665 Albany $ 14,841 $ 45,654 $ 28,014 $ 34,536 $ 123,044 Berkeley $ 220,673 $ 288,624 $ 214,657 $ 282,482 $ 1,006,436 Dublin $ 181,239 $ 126,960 $ 108,087 $ 162,432 $ 578,717 Emeryville $ 64,510 $ 26,312 $ 22,314 $ 24,820 $ 137,956 Fremont $ 1,181,806 $ 577,567 $ 494,754 $ 469,091 $ 2,723,218 Hayward $ 351,671 $ 403,611 $ 291,991 $ 361,294 $ 1,408,567 Livermore $ 266,112 $ 226,155 $ 287,631 $ 304,311 $ 1,084,210 Newark $ 284,787 $ 118,677 $ 117,043 $ 203,098 $ 723,606 Oakland $ 949,303 $ 1,136,628 $ 935,536 $ 496,648 $ 3,518,116 Piedmont $ - $ 30,026 $ 37,056 $ 2,704 $ 69,786 Pleasanton $ 235,957 $ 187,700 $ 241,188 $ 259,418 $ 924,264 San Leandro $ 158,256 $ 221,413 $ 184,567 $ 220,162 $ 784,399 Union City $ 299,846 $ 198,558 $ 156,600 $ 255,579 $ 910,583 COUNTY TOTAL $ 4,491,676 $ 4,173,937 $ 3,742,773 $ 3,642,647 $ 16,051,033

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share County of Contra Costa $ 78,444 $ 469,529 $ 615,540 $ 453,995 $ 1,617,508 Antioch $ 191,148 $ 271,484 $ 279,760 $ 289,677 $ 1,032,070 Brentwood $ - $ 136,915 $ 176,180 $ 107,489 $ 420,584 Clayton $ 39,904 $ 29,172 $ 42,334 $ 43,472 $ 154,882 Concord $ 165,451 $ 334,824 $ 334,292 $ 325,642 $ 1,160,209 Danville $ - $ 115,315 $ 150,066 $ 92,924 $ 358,305 El Cerrito $ 53,433 $ 63,082 $ 65,264 $ 70,929 $ 252,710 Hercules $ 79,353 $ 65,798 $ 57,697 $ 79,150 $ 281,998 Lafayette $ 6,128 $ 64,819 $ 95,975 $ 65,132 $ 232,055 Martinez $ 105,966 $ 97,772 $ 112,006 $ 93,686 $ 409,430 Moraga $ 108,805 $ 43,655 $ 53,006 $ 80,171 $ 285,636 Oakley $ 110,730 $ 89,836 $ 97,145 $ 116,165 $ 413,876 Orinda $ 25,893 $ 47,453 $ 90,909 $ 55,918 $ 220,172 Pinole $ 22,146 $ 51,919 $ 56,053 $ 50,771 $ 180,888 Pittsburg $ 90,691 $ 172,184 $ 147,843 $ 46,875 $ 457,593 Pleasant Hill $ 29,908 $ 90,287 $ 114,896 $ 83,883 $ 318,975 Richmond $ 456,506 $ 280,184 $ 259,200 $ 388,590 $ 1,384,480 San Pablo $ - $ 84,371 $ 49,224 $ 24,645 $ 158,241 San Ramon $ 61,714 $ 159,605 $ 173,252 $ 49,871 $ 444,442 Walnut Creek $ 331,449 $ 176,658 $ 217,974 $ 283,312 $ 1,009,393 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,957,672 $ 2,844,862 $ 3,188,616 $ 2,802,299 $ 10,793,448

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share County of Marin $ 81,898 $ 188,831 $ 400,883 $ 207,899 $ 879,511 Belvedere $ - $ 5,846 $ 11,169 $ 6,639 $ 23,653 Corte Madera $ - $ 25,731 $ 29,834 $ 18,925 $ 74,490 Fairfax $ 12,427 $ 20,050 $ 25,020 $ 6,791 $ 64,288 Larkspur $ 14,049 $ 33,013 $ 29,536 $ - $ 76,598 Mill Valley $ 30,172 $ 37,668 $ 54,621 $ 6,597 $ 129,059 Novato $ 65,350 $ 142,658 $ 138,840 $ 27,034 $ 373,883 Ross $ - $ 6,473 $ 10,657 $ 2,293 $ 19,423 San Anselmo $ 36,898 $ 34,087 $ 37,904 $ 186 $ 109,074 San Rafael $ 128,930 $ 157,530 $ 157,287 $ 101,830 $ 545,578 Sausalito $ 21,724 $ 20,296 $ 24,859 $ 15,532 $ 82,411 Tiburon $ 7,193 $ 24,121 $ 31,521 $ 11,770 $ 74,606 COUNTY TOTAL $ 398,642 $ 696,304 $ 952,130 $ 405,498 $ 2,452,574

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share County of Napa $ 256,499 $ 77,950 $ 213,676 $ 6,544 $ 554,668 American Canyon $ 68,120 $ 44,074 $ 43,600 $ 50,124 $ 205,918 Calistoga $ 8,032 $ 14,342 $ 13,363 $ 11,245 $ 46,982 Napa $ 311,279 $ 208,578 $ 213,676 $ 251,603 $ 985,136 St. Helena $ 56,110 $ 16,025 $ 24,261 $ - $ 96,396 Yountville $ - $ 8,827 $ 7,662 $ - $ 16,489 COUNTY TOTAL $ 700,040 $ 369,795 $ 516,239 $ 319,515 $ 1,905,589

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share San Francisco $ 2,456,840 $ 2,230,405 $ 968,772 $ 2,206,940 $ 7,862,958 COUNTY TOTAL $ 2,456,840 $ 2,230,405 $ 968,772 $ 2,206,940 $ 7,862,958

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share County of San Mateo $ - $ 178,113 $ 303,112 $ 171,367 $ 652,592 Atherton $ - $ 20,220 $ 50,703 $ 27,674 $ 98,597 Belmont $ 66,781 $ 70,543 $ 64,013 $ 78,560 $ 279,898 Brisbane $ 17,178 $ 10,444 $ 27,958 $ 21,687 $ 77,267 Burlingame $ 71,019 $ 78,088 $ 77,191 $ 88,300 $ 314,598 Colma $ 16,342 $ 4,363 $ 10,889 $ 699 $ 32,293 Daly City $ 200,195 $ 287,715 $ 120,786 $ 237,509 $ 846,205 East Palo Alto $ 72,315 $ 88,989 $ 37,766 $ 70,680 $ 269,750 Foster City $ 32,250 $ 81,986 $ 57,327 $ 30,124 $ 201,687 Half Moon Bay $ 17,005 $ 35,290 $ 26,536 $ - $ 78,832 Hillsborough $ 44,930 $ 30,492 $ 77,713 $ 25,306 $ 178,440 Menlo Park $ 33,725 $ 85,183 $ 94,497 $ 38,271 $ 251,676 Millbrae $ 59,170 $ 57,854 $ 59,279 $ 68,792 $ 245,096 Pacifica $ 96,069 $ 107,164 $ 88,564 $ 113,857 $ 405,655 Portola Valley $ 28,982 $ 12,549 $ 33,691 $ 29,351 $ 104,573 Redwood City $ 109,750 $ 209,019 $ 167,271 $ 188,963 $ 675,004

LSRWG 120309 - Page 95 of 118 S:\Project\Pavement Management\Projects\Projections\2009\Allocation\STP_Cycle1.xls 11/20/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 5C(ii) DRAFT LSR STP Cycle 1 Funding Distribution -- Assumes $79 Million Funding Level Attachment B

San Bruno $ 119,006 $ 117,519 $ 84,157 $ 74,592 $ 395,275 San Carlos $ 645 $ 78,060 $ 82,688 $ 30,097 $ 191,491 San Mateo $ 102,385 $ 259,082 $ 193,879 $ 199,873 $ 755,219 So. San Francisco $ 187,755 $ 172,433 $ 141,683 $ 195,827 $ 697,697 Woodside $ 1,027 $ 15,216 $ 45,775 $ 24,199 $ 86,216 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,276,531 $ 2,000,322 $ 1,845,478 $ 1,715,729 $ 6,838,061

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share County of Santa Clara $ 275,695 $ 268,133 $ 732,109 $ 497,862 $ 1,773,799 Campbell $ 112,658 $ 108,639 $ 103,471 $ 13,017 $ 337,785 Cupertino $ 143,092 $ 150,270 $ 143,342 $ 17,679 $ 454,383 Gilroy $ 214,369 $ 138,427 $ 114,925 $ 182,501 $ 650,222 Los Altos $ 14,581 $ 76,529 $ 104,244 $ 76,226 $ 271,580 Los Altos Hills $ - $ 23,905 $ 51,328 $ 23,273 $ 98,506 Los Gatos $ 86,308 $ 81,953 $ 103,282 $ 30,104 $ 301,647 Milpitas $ 258,189 $ 187,784 $ 125,401 $ 130,841 $ 702,216 Monte Sereno $ 491 $ 9,681 $ 14,486 $ 6,573 $ 31,231 Morgan Hill $ 124,452 $ 106,088 $ 117,284 $ 135,719 $ 483,543 Mountain View $ 61,870 $ 199,992 $ 156,065 $ 79,534 $ 497,461 Palo Alto $ 55,529 $ 171,413 $ 187,837 $ 161,844 $ 576,623 San Jose $ 1,446,109 $ 2,676,665 $ 1,922,831 $ 2,358,955 $ 8,404,559 Santa Clara $ 315,572 $ 312,445 $ 286,830 $ 312,279 $ 1,227,126 Saratoga $ 89,109 $ 85,459 $ 133,064 $ 31,478 $ 339,109 Sunnyvale $ 250,798 $ 372,051 $ 243,847 $ 338,179 $ 1,204,875 COUNTY TOTAL $ 3,448,821 $ 4,969,433 $ 4,540,345 $ 4,396,064 $ 17,354,664

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share County of Solano $ 36,500 $ 54,597 $ 553,645 $ 223,676 $ 868,417 Benicia $ 90,325 $ 75,683 $ 89,810 $ 47,276 $ 303,094 Dixon $ 69,003 $ 47,547 $ 61,270 $ 69,384 $ 247,204 Fairfield $ 388,777 $ 288,775 $ 332,747 $ 394,212 $ 1,404,512 Rio Vista $ 24,190 $ 21,833 $ 21,546 $ - $ 67,569 Suisun City $ 227,786 $ 76,264 $ 68,851 $ 145,504 $ 518,405 Vacaville $ 314,003 $ 262,136 $ 249,533 $ 322,172 $ 1,147,843 Vallejo $ 712,955 $ 327,577 $ 311,087 $ 527,393 $ 1,879,011 COUNTY TOTAL $ 1,863,538 $ 1,154,412 $ 1,688,490 $ 1,729,616 $ 6,436,054

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share County of Sonoma $ 1,785,131 $ 411,099 $ 1,293,824 $ 1,361,796 $ 4,851,849 Cloverdale $ 1,606 $ 23,201 $ 30,090 $ 1,797 $ 56,694 Cotati $ 34,171 $ 20,375 $ 21,646 $ 14,075 $ 90,266 Healdsburg $ 54,422 $ 31,666 $ 43,216 $ 50,453 $ 179,756 Petaluma $ 407,562 $ 155,320 $ 180,653 $ 290,123 $ 1,033,658 Rohnert Park $ 176,545 $ 116,486 $ 97,264 $ 152,290 $ 542,585 Santa Rosa $ 556,281 $ 432,761 $ 512,476 $ 558,211 $ 2,059,729 Sebastopol $ 30,787 $ 20,867 $ 21,845 $ 3,968 $ 77,466 Sonoma $ 8,419 $ 26,897 $ 31,748 $ 2,379 $ 69,443 Windsor $ 101,319 $ 71,858 $ 74,396 $ 96,601 $ 344,173 COUNTY TOTAL $ 3,156,241 $ 1,310,530 $ 2,307,157 $ 2,531,692 $ 9,305,620

Jurisdiction MTS Shortfall Population Lane Mileage Performance Share Total Share % Share Alameda $ 4,491,676 4,173,937 3,742,773 3,642,647 16,051,033 20.3% Contra Costa $ 1,957,672 2,844,862 3,188,616 2,802,299 10,793,448 13.7% Marin $ 398,642 696,304 952,130 405,498 2,452,574 3.1% Napa $ 700,040 369,795 516,239 319,515 1,905,589 2.4% San Francisco $ 2,456,840 2,230,405 968,772 2,206,940 7,862,958 10.0% San Mateo $ 1,276,531 2,000,322 1,845,478 1,715,729 6,838,061 8.7% Santa Clara $ 3,448,821 4,969,433 4,540,345 4,396,064 17,354,664 22.0% Solano $ 1,863,538 1,154,412 1,688,490 1,729,616 6,436,054 8.1% Sonoma $ 3,156,241 1,310,530 2,307,157 2,531,692 9,305,620 11.8% Total $ 19,750,000 19,750,000 19,750,000 19,750,000 79,000,000 100.0%

LSRWG 120309 - Page 96 of 118 S:\Project\Pavement Management\Projects\Projections\2009\Allocation\STP_Cycle1.xls 11/20/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6A

TO: Local Streets and Roads Working Group DATE: December 3, 2009 FR: Sri Srinivasan

RE: TIP Update

2009 TIP Revisions

TIP Revision 09-33 – Pending Revision 09-33 is an amendment that revises 42 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $145.4 million. The amendment also serves to update the fiscal constraint demonstration of the TIP to show the loss in revenues, significant of which, is the loss of the $174 million in private funding and a 10% projected decrease in transit fare revenues. Other noteworthy project changes in the amendment are as follows: o Deletes 25 completed projects from the TIP (9 local streets and roads projects, 2 highway projects; and 14 transit projects) and one project because the proposed local funds for the project did not materialize (Gilroy - Railroad Ave. Streetscape project). o Updates the back-up list and project cost of the Caltrans managed Grouped Listing for Highway Bridge Program to include $166.7 million in new programming o Updates the funding plan for the BART Oakland Airport Connector project to remove $174 million in PVT funds and $36.2 million in Other Local funds; and add in $101.618 million in TIFIA funds; $47.2 million in RM2 funds; $20 million in SLPP funds; $12.8 million in PTMISEA funds and $12.719 million in XTRAN funds o Updates the funding plan for the Transbay Transit Center – TIFIA Loan Debt Service based on TIFIA loan agreement by $50.7 million o Transfers $17.5 million in CMAQ funds from the AC Transit sponsored Enhanced Bus - Telegraph/Intl/East 14th project (ALA050017) to the new AC Transit - Operating Service project (ALA090051). The changes made with this revision will not affect the air quality conformity or conflict with the financial constraint requirements. The MTC Commission is on schedule to approve the revision 09-33 on December 16, 2009 and final federal approval is expected in early March 2010.

TIP Revision 09-31 – Pending Revision No. 09-31 is an amendment that revises 74 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $23.8 million. The significant changes in the amendment are as follows: • Deletes 63 completed projects from the TIP (42 local streets and roads projects, 2 highway projects; and 19 transit projects) • Adds one new MTC managed grouped listing for New Freedom funds for FY08 and FY09 for large urbanized areas totaling $5.8 million • Adds $6.4 million in ARRA TIGGER funds to the AC Transit sponsored Zero Emission Bus Advanced Demonstration project • Updates the funding plan for the San Mateo County Traffic Incident Management project to add $1M in RIP funds from the Willow Road Interchange project (SM010047); $500K in RIP funds, $2.3M in TLSP funds and $4M in Other Local funds • Updates back-up list and project cost of the Caltrans managed Grouped Listing for railroad crossings to include $6.6 million in Section 130 Funds in FY 2010. J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Memos\11_Dec 09 - LSR\06a_0_TIP Update Memo_111209.doc

LSRWG 120309 - Page 97 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6A

TIP revision Update December 3, 2009 Page 2 of 3

The changes made with this revision will not affect the air quality conformity or conflict with the financial constraint requirements. The MTC Commission approved revision 09-31 on November 18, 2009 and final federal approval is expected in early January 2009.

TIP Revision 09-30 – Pending Revision No. 09-30 is an amendment that revises 48 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $4.8 million. Among these changes, the amendment: Deletes thirty completed projects from the TIP (twenty local streets and roads projects and ten transit projects) and the Golden Gate Transit project to replace 34 - 1991 40' TMC buses (MRN050023) because all the funds ($8,293,951 in FY 2009 Section 5307 funds and $2,073,488 of corresponding local match) are being transferred to the Facilities Rehabilitation Project (MRN050025). Adds one new Caltrans managed SHOPP Grouped Listing for Highway Maintenance with four projects totaling $19.1 million. Updates the back-up list and project costs of four Caltrans managed SHOPP Grouped Listings. o Mandates and Prop 1B decrease by $52.9 million to remove a state cash funded project from the TIP, because it does not need federal reimbursement). o Emergency response increases by $23.9 million due increase in construction costs for various projects. o Collision Reduction increases by $17.9 million. o Mobility decreases by $6.3 million The changes made with this revision will not affect the air quality conformity or conflict with the financial constraint requirements. The MTC Commission approved revision 09-30 on October 28, 2009 and final federal approval is expected in early December 2009.

TIP Revision 09-29 - Approved. Revision No. 09-29 is an administrative modification that revises 58 projects with a net decrease in funding of approximately $807,000. Among other changes, the revision updates nine Grouped Listings funded with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds. These changes allow project sponsors to reinvest some of their cost savings and update the back-up list. Among other changes, the revision also updates 14 regional planning projects to reflect the commission approval of the STP/CMAQ programming for these projects. The changes made with this revision will not affect the air quality conformity or conflict with the financial constraint requirements

Revision 09-29 was approved by the MTC Deputy Executive Director on November 10, 2009 and final Caltrans approval was received on November 12, 2009.

TIP Revision 09-28 - Approved Revision No. 09-28 is an administrative modification that revises 25 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $1.7 million. Among other changes, the revision updates 11 Grouped Listings funded with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds. These changes allow project sponsors to reinvest some of their cost savings and use the recent FTA operations flexibility. The revision also updates the funding plans of various projects including changes in the US 101 Doyle Drive Replacement project ($12.2M in CON phase funds being reprogrammed to ROW phase to address corresponding change in cost for the phases) and I-580 TriValley Corridor - EB HOV/HOT Lanes project ($7.5M in CON phase funds being reprogrammed to PE phase). The changes made with this revision will not affect the air quality conformity or conflict with the financial constraint requirements.

Revision 09-28 was approved by the MTC Deputy Executive Director on September 16, 2009 and final Caltrans approval was received on September 17, 2009.

TIP Revision 09-27 - Approved

LSRWG 120309 - Page 98 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6A

TIP revision Update December 3, 2009 Page 3 of 3

Revision No. 09-27 is an amendment that revises 15 projects with a net decrease in funding of approximately $58.5 million. Among other changes, the amendment: • Adds three new projects into the TIP (two planning projects and one local road rehabilitation project) • Deletes two projects from the TIP: The Grand/MacArthur Blvd Corridor Improvements project because the funds are being used for the new Study Contra Flow Lanes on Bay Bridge project; and the Alameda- Oakland Ferry Main Street Barge project because the listing was a duplicate of an existing project. • Updates the back-up list and project costs of four Caltrans managed SHOPP Grouped Listings. o Collision Reduction increases by $62.9 million with the addition of several projects including safety projects on SR84 and SR152 totaling $60 million. o Emergency Response increases by $43.2 million with the addition of several projects including a $16 million safety project on Route 580. o Bridge Preservation decreases by $151.1 million to remove duplicate programming in the back- up listing of about $140 million; o Roadway Preservation decreases by $18.5 million. • Updates the back-up list and project cost of the Grouped Listing funded with FTA 5307 ARRA funds for the Concord Urbanized Area to add operating assistance projects. The changes made with this revision will not affect the air quality conformity or conflict with the financial constraint requirements.

Revision 09-27 was approved by the MTC Commission on September 23, 2009, Caltrans approval was received on September 28, 2009 and final federal approval was received on October 27, 2009.

TIP Revision 09-26 - Approved Revision No. 09-26 is an administrative modification that revises 17 projects with a net decrease in funding of approximately $3.6 million. Among other changes, the revision updates six Grouped Listings funded with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds. These changes allow project sponsors to reinvest some of their cost savings. The revision also updates six Caltrans managed Grouped Listings. Another significant change in this revision is the update to the funding plan of the Sonoma Marin Area Rail Corridor project by removing $5 million in FTA section 5309 funds that were not allocated. The changes made with this revision will not affect the air quality conformity or conflict with the financial constraint requirements.

Revision 09-26 was approved by the MTC Deputy Executive Director on August 20, 2009 and final Caltrans approval was received on August 20, 2009.

TIP Revision 09-25 - Approved Revision No. 09-25 is an administrative modification that makes revisions to 16 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $6.2 million. Among other changes, the revision updates the project costs of thirteen regional planning projects to include STP or CMAQ funds and updates the local matching funds. The funding plan of AC Transit’s Preventive Maintenance program was updated to include $1.8 million in FTA 5307 funds transferred in from the AC Transit Facilities Upgrade project. The changes made with this revision will not affect the air quality conformity or conflict with the financial constraint requirements.

Revision 09-25 was approved by the MTC Executive Director on August 6, 2009 and final Caltrans approval was received on August 10, 2009.

All prior revisions have been approved and projects in all the revisions can be viewed at: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/tip/revisions.htm The FMS system has also been updated to reflect the approvals received. If you have any questions regarding any TIP project, please contact Sri Srinivasan at (510) 817-5793 or [email protected].

LSRWG 120309 - Page 99 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6A TFWG Item 14

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) TENTATIVE 2009 TIP REVISION SCHEDULE (SUBJECT TO CHANGE) as of November 12, 2009

REVISION TIP REVISION REQUEST MTC APPROVAL REVISION TYPE NOTE STATE APPROVAL* FED. APPROVAL* NUMBER SUBMISSION DEADLINE APPROVAL* STATUS

Admin. Modification 09-01 First Admin Mod September 30, 2008 December 15, 2008 December 16, 2008 N/A APPROVED Amendment 09-02 First Amendment October 31, 2008 December 17, 2008 January 2, 2009 January 30, 2009 APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-03 Regular December 31, 2008 January 30, 2009 February 5, 2009 N/A APPROVED Amendment 09-04 Expedited January 16, 2009 February 25, 2009 March 6, 2009 March 17, 2009 APPROVED Amendment 09-05 ARRA - Revenues February 20, 2009 February 25, 2009 February 26, 2009 March 17, 2009 APPROVED Amendment 09-06 RTP AQ Conformity August 29, 2008 April 22, 2009 May 12, 2009 May 29, 2009 APPROVED Amendment 09-07 ARRA January 30, 2009 February 25, 2009 March 2, 2009 March 17, 2009 APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-08 ARRA February 28, 2009 March 17, 2009 March 18, 2009 N/A APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-09 Regular February 28, 2009 April 9, 2009 April 13, 2009 N/A APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-10 ARRA March 31, 2009 April 10, 2009 April 13, 2009 N/A APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-11 ARRA April 15, 2009 April 16, 2009 April 16, 2009 N/A APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-12 ARRA April 22, 2009 April 22, 2009 April 24, 2009 N/A APPROVED Amendment 09-13 ARRA February 28, 2009 April 22, 2009 May 27, 2009 June 10, 2009 APPROVED Amendment 09-14 Regular / UPP February 28, 2009 April 22, 2009 May 28, 2009 June 10, 2009 APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-15 Regular April 10, 2009 June 3, 2009 June 4, 2009 N/A APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-16 ARRA April 10, 2009 May 22, 2009 May 27,2009 N/A APPROVED Amendment 09-17 Annual Transit POP April 30, 2009 May 27, 2009 June 17, 2009 June 23, 2009 APPROVED Amendment 09-18 Regular April 30, 2009 May 27, 2009 June 18, 2009 July 8, 2009 APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-19 ARRA May 31, 2009 June 29, 2009 June 30, 2009 N/A APPROVED Amendment 09-20 Regular May 31, 2009 June 24, 2009 July 6, 2009 July 21, 2009 APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-21 STP/CMAQ July 7, 2009 July 13, 2009 July 13, 2009 N/A APPROVED Amendment 09-22 Regular June 15, 2009 July 22, 2009 August 5, 2009 August 21, 2009 APPROVED Amendment 09-23 Transit Only June 15, 2009 July 22, 2009 August 10, 2009 August 14, 2009 APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-24 Regular July 1, 2009 July 23, 2009 July 23, 2009 N/A APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-25 Regular July 31, 2009 August 6, 2009 August 10, 2009 N/A APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-26 Regular/ARRA August 19, 2009 August 20, 2009 August 20, 2009 N/A APPROVED Amendment 09-27 Regular/ARRA July 31, 2009 September 23, 2009 September 30, 2009 October 27, 2009 APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-28 ARRA September 15, 2009 September 16, 2009 September 17, 2009 N/A APPROVED Admin. Modification 09-29 Regular September 30, 2009 November 10, 2009 November 12, 2009 N/A APPROVED Amendment 09-30 Regular September 30, 2009 October 28, 2009 December 4, 2009 December 31, 2009 Pending Amendment 09-31 Regular September 30, 2009 November 18, 2009 December 4, 2009 December 31, 2009 In-Process Admin. Modification 09-32 Regular November 27, 2009 December 23, 2009 January 8, 2010 N/A TBD Amendment 09-33 Regular October 30, 2009 December 16, 2010 January 29, 2010 March 12, 2010 TBD Admin. Modification 09-34 Regular December 30, 2009 January 27, 2010 February 5, 2010 N/A TBD Admin. Modification 09-35 Regular January 29, 2010 February 26, 2010 March 12, 2010 N/A TBD Amendment 09-36 Regular January 29, 2010 March 10, 2010 April 16, 2010 May 21, 2010 TBD J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Memos\11_Dec 09 - LSR\[06a_1_2009 TIP Revision Schedule 11-12-09.xls]2009 TIP Schedule Kindly Note: * Future approval dates are expected dates and are subject to change * State approval required for all revision types. Federal approval required only for TIP Amendments

LSRWG 120309 - Page 100 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6B

TO: Local Streets and Roads Working Group DATE: December 3, 2009 FR: Sri Srinivasan

RE: 2011 TIP Development – Data Clean Up – RTP Data

Background:

The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a comprehensive listing of all Bay Area surface transportation projects that are to receive federal funding or are subject to a federally required action, or are considered regionally significant for Air Quality Conformity purposes, during the four-year period from FY 2008-09 through FY 2011-12. MTC is required to prepare and adopt an updated TIP every two years.

In order to make the TIP development process easier, we are looking to "clean up" the TIP in advance of the 2011 TIP development that will take place next year. This process will involve several steps; the first step was to archive projects from the TIP (Deadline was October 30, 2009).

The second step is to ensure that for all the projects that remain in the TIP, the data contained is valid. In light of the fact that the TIP is data intensive, the data cleanup process is a series of steps, the first of which is checking for RTP consistency.

Of the approximately 1263 active projects in the TIP, 199 projects have invalid/inconsistent RTP information, where the RTP Title is “Warning: This project is not part of T-2035 RTP” It is important to correct this information because federal regulations require that only projects consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) are to be included in the TIP. RTP consistency means that 1) the scope of the project in the TIP and the RTP title are consistent with one another and 2) the project costs in the TIP do not exceed those in the RTP’s financially constrained investment plan.

Next Steps:.

Attached is a list of all the active projects in the TIP with invalid RTP information. The steps to follow are listed below. 1) Log into FMS and go to the Project Search Page 2) Select the project 3) Review the RTP ID, RTP Title, RTP cost on the General Information page 4) If the title is inconsistent, please click on the link to the T-2035 RTP project list (it will open a PDF document) and identify the correct RTP ID. 5) Please choose the appropriate RTP ID in drop down menu

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Memos\11_Dec 09 - LSR\06b_0_data clean-up part 1.doc

LSRWG 120309 - Page 101 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6B

TIP Data Clean Up – RTP Data December 3, 2009 Page 2 of 2

6) This will automatically populate the RTP Title and RTP Cost fields. Please enter the RTP page number as well (as seen in the PDF). 7) Submit the revision by December 31, 2009

Link to T-2035 RTP Project List

Thank you for your continued efforts with the TIP. If you have any questions, please contact Sri Srinivasan at (510) 817-5793 or [email protected].

LSRWG 120309 - Page 102 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6B Projects with Invalid / Inconsistent RTP Information

Sl.No. County Sponsor TIP_ID Project Name 1 Alameda AC Transit ALA010060 AC Transit Welfare to Work Program 2 Alameda AC Transit ALA070047 TravelChoice-Berkeley 3 Alameda ACCMA ALA030042 East Bay Incident & Emergency Mgmt. System 4 Alameda ACCMA ALA050036 Alameda SMART Corridors Operations & Management 5 Alameda Alameda ALA070049 Signal Coordination: 8th St, Otis Dr, & Park St. 6 Alameda Alameda County ALA050035 Sidewalk Improv. in Cherryland/Ashland/CV 7 Alameda Alameda County ALA070008 Lewelling Blvd Widening 8 Alameda BART ALA070051 BART Station Electronic Bike Lockers, Ph. 2 9 Alameda Caltrans ALA010014 I-680 Sunol Grade NB HOV Lane 10 Alameda Caltrans ALA070003 I-880 Fifth Avenue Bridge Retrofit/Replacement 11 Alameda Caltrans ALA070005 I-580 Oakland Horton/Hollis St. Widening 12 Alameda Caltrans ALA070007 I-880 High Street Bridge Retrofit/Replacement 13 Alameda Dublin ALA050007 Dougherty Road Widening 14 Alameda Fremont ALA070050 Mowry Ave Arterial Management 15 Alameda Hayward ALA070052 Second Street New Sidewalk Construction 16 Alameda Oakland ALA050023 Oakland - Various Streets Rehabilitation 17 Alameda Oakland ALA070012 Oakland Coliseum TOD 18 Alameda Oakland ALA991081 42nd Ave. & High St. I-880 Access Improv. 19 Alameda Port of Oakland ALA070054 California Inter-regional Rail Intermodal Study 20 Alameda Port of Oakland MTC050019 LNG Infrastructure Implementation 21 Alameda San Leandro ALA070030 San Leandro - Traffic Signal System Improvements 22 Alameda San Leandro ALA070048 San Leandro ATMS Upgrade 23 Alameda SJRC ALA050043 ACE Signal System Rehabilitation 24 Alameda SJRC ALA050066 Signal Upgrade Project (Stockton to Lathrop) 25 Alameda SJRC ALA050067 GPS Train Tracking & Reporting System 26 Alameda Union City ALA070053 Three CNG Powered Replacement Trucks 27 Contra Costa Antioch CC-070008 Laurel Road Extension 28 Contra Costa BART CC-030009 BART Stations Bicycle Pavilions 29 Contra Costa Brentwood CC-070011 SR4/Brentwood Boulevard Widening - North 30 Contra Costa Brentwood CC-070012 SR4 (Brentwood Boulevard) Widening 31 Contra Costa Caltrans CC-070017 I-680 South Contra Costa Roadway Rehabilitation 32 Contra Costa CC County CC-010031 Delta DeAnza Trail Gap Closure 33 Contra Costa CC County CC-070019 SR 239 Construction 34 Contra Costa CC County CC-070020 Port Costa-Martinez Bike/Ped Trail 35 Contra Costa CC County CC-990046 Iron Horse Trail Over-crossing at Treat 36 Contra Costa CCCTA CC-050059 Martinez Intermodal Facility Restoration 37 Contra Costa CCCTA CC-070096 Facility Access Control Systems 38 Contra Costa CCCTA CC-070099 Basic Security Awareness Training 39 Contra Costa CCTA CC-030005 I-680 Auxiliary Lanes 40 Contra Costa CCTA CC-070022 I-680 NB HOV Gap Closure 41 Contra Costa Danville CC-050075 Crow Canyon/Camino Tassajara Intersection Improve. 42 Contra Costa EB Reg Park Dis CC-070033 Bike/Ped Trail Improvements in CC Parks 43 Contra Costa EB Reg Park Dis CC-070063 Atlas Road Bridge 44 Contra Costa EB Reg Park Dis CC-070069 Oakley - Big Break Regional Trail 45 Contra Costa ECCTA CC-070061 E. Leland Park and Ride Lot 46 Contra Costa Hercules CC-070040 Hercules Transit Center Relocation 47 Contra Costa Hercules CC-070051 SR4/Willow Avenue Ramps 48 Contra Costa Lafayette CC-070039 Lafayette Carpool Lots 49 Contra Costa Martinez CC-070037 Alhambra Avenue Widening 50 Contra Costa Martinez CC-070038 I-680/Marina Vista I/C Improvements 51 Contra Costa Martinez CC-090005 Court Street Overcrossing, Phase 1

LSRWG 120309 - Page 103 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6B Projects with Invalid / Inconsistent RTP Information

Sl.No. County Sponsor TIP_ID Project Name 69 Marin TAM MRN090014 Marin County: Street Resurfacing Program - SLPP 70 Marin TAM MRN090015 San Raphael: Street Resurfacing Program - SLPP 71 Napa Caltrans NAP010008 SR 12 (Jamieson Canyon Road) Widening 72 Napa Caltrans NAP050001 SR 29 - Trancas Street I/C Mitigation Planting 73 Napa Napa NAP070006 Napa - Soscol Avenue Rehabilitation 74 Napa Napa NAP070007 Napa - Soscol Road Rehabilitation Phase 2 75 Napa Napa County NAP070001 Napa - Las Amigas Class II Bicycle Lane 76 Regional BART BRT050004 BART: Core System Rehabilitation Program 77 Regional Caltrain JPB990004 Caltrain: N/S Terminal Track Upgrades 78 Regional Caltrain SM-030035 Train Tracking Information System 79 Regional Caltrain SM-03006B Caltrain: Systemwide Track Rehab & Related Struct. 80 Regional Caltrain SM-050041 Caltrain: Signal/Communication Rehab. & Upgrades 81 Regional Caltrans B-C030001 Carquinez Bridge Demolition 82 Santa Clara Caltrain SCL010013 San Jose to Santa Clara - 4th Main Track 83 Santa Clara Caltrain SCL050065 Installation of Fixed Fuel Facility 84 Santa Clara Caltrain SCL991060 Caltrain/ACE Santa Clara Train Station 85 Santa Clara Caltrans SCL030008 SR 87 Guadalupe Freeway Corridor 86 Santa Clara Caltrans SCL050006 Mathilda Avenue Bridge Replacement. 87 Santa Clara Caltrans SCL050011 SR 152 Runoff Pollution Control 88 Santa Clara Caltrans SCL050013 US 101 / SR 87-Trimble Road Landscaping 89 Santa Clara Caltrans SCL970002 SR 152 Truck Passing Lane - Part A 90 Santa Clara Caltrans SCL991023 Traffic Operating System Improvements 91 Santa Clara Gilroy SCL070006 Camino Arroyo Bridge and Gap Closure 92 Santa Clara Los Gatos SCL050042 SR 9 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements 93 Santa Clara Milpitas SCL050077 SR 237 - Calaveras Blvd Widening 94 Santa Clara Milpitas SCL070034 Tasman LRT Landscaping 95 Santa Clara Palo Alto SCL070023 El Camino Real/Stanford Ave Intersection Imps. 96 Santa Clara San Jose SCL050079 Silicon Valley TIMC 97 Santa Clara San Jose SCL050081 Lower Guadalupe River Trail 98 Santa Clara San Jose SCL050082 Bay Trail Reach 9 99 Santa Clara San Jose SCL050083 Coyote Creek Trail 100 Santa Clara San Jose SCL991007 Stevens Creek Blvd/Winchester Blvd ITS 101 Santa Clara Santa Clara SCL050010 San Tomas Aquino Creek Trail - Reach 3 102 Santa Clara Santa Clara SCL050073 Santa Clara - Tasman Dr. and Homestead Rd. Rehab 103 Santa Clara Santa Clara Co SCL050072 Santa Clara Co. - Capitol Expwy. Rehabilitation 104 Santa Clara Santa Clara Co SCL050075 Santa Clara Co. - Oregon/Page Mill Expwy Rehab 105 Santa Clara Santa Clara Co SCL050076 Santa Clara Co. - Various Non-Expressway Rehab 106 Santa Clara Santa Clara Co SCL050080 Oregon-Page Mill Expwy Improvements 107 Santa Clara Santa Clara Co SCL070042 San Tomas Bicycle Shoulder Delineation - Phase 2 108 Santa Clara Saratoga SCL070050 Highway 9 Safety Improvements 109 Santa Clara SJRC ALA050042 San Joaquin Rail Corridor: ADA Operating Set-aside 110 Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL991063 Borregas Ave/US 101/SR 237 Bike/Ped Bridges 111 Santa Clara VTA SCL010019 I-880 Coleman Avenue I/C Reconfiguration. 112 Santa Clara VTA SCL010035 I-280 Soundwall 113 Santa Clara VTA SCL010037 I-680 Soundwall -Capitol Expwy to Mueller 114 Santa Clara VTA SCL010038 I-880 Soundwall 115 Santa Clara VTA SCL010040 SR-152/SR-156 Interchange Improvements. 116 Santa Clara VTA SCL030012 Garvee Debt. Srv. - SCL010019, SCL990030-31 117 Santa Clara VTA SCL030015 Sunnyvale Transit Center Enhancement 118 Santa Clara VTA SCL030020 Francis St. Corridor Enhancement 119 Santa Clara VTA SCL030022 Tamien Caltrain Station Enhancements 120 Santa Clara VTA SCL050035 Caltrain Service Improvement Project in SCL 121 Santa Clara VTA SCL070003 SR 25/Santa Teresa Blvd/US 101 IC 122 Santa Clara VTA SCL070018 Santa Clara County HOT Lane Project 123 Santa Clara VTA SCL070035 FY2006 VPP Program - Studies 124 Santa Clara VTA SCL990002 I-880 - SR 237/Dixon Landing Replacement Planting 125 San Francisco BART SF-050021 Balboa Park Walkway & Access Improv. 126 San Francisco GGBHTD SF-070037 Golden Gate Bridge - Moveable Median Barrier 127 San Francisco MUNI SF-070030 SFGO-Corridor Management 128 San Francisco MUNI SF-950023 Replacement Paratransit Accessible Vans 129 San Francisco Natl Park Svc SF-030002 Golden Gate National Park Road Rehab 130 San Francisco Natl Park Svc SF-050045 Trails & Bikeways 131 San Francisco Natl Park Svc SF-090024 Prepare an EIS 132 San Francisco Natl Park Svc SF-090026 Implement Parking System to Fund Shuttle & Transit 133 San Francisco Natl Park Svc SF-090027 Design Accessible Bus Stop and Link to Transit 134 San Francisco Port of SF SF-010007 Illinois St Inter-modal Bridge 135 San Francisco Port of SF SF-050018 Downtown Ferry Terminal Public Pier 136 San Francisco Port of SF SF-070010 San Francisco Downtown Ferry Terminal LSRWG 120309 - Page 104 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6B Projects with Invalid / Inconsistent RTP Information

Sl.No. County Sponsor TIP_ID Project Name 137 San Francisco Port of SF SF-070011 Cargo Way Bay Trail Improvements 138 San Francisco Port of SF SF-070012 Fishermans Wharf Ferry Terminal Improvements 139 San Francisco Port of SF SF-070013 Freight Rail Tunnel Modifications 140 San Francisco Presidio SF-090025 PresidiGo Shuttle CNG Buses 141 San Francisco SF County TA SF-050044 S.F. Value Pricing Study & Pilot 142 San Francisco SF County TA SF-070027 Yerba Buena Island Ramp Improvements 143 San Francisco SF Dept of Park SF-010018 Oak and Fell Streets ITMS Project 144 San Francisco SF Dept of Park SF-050019 Shared Lane Pavement Marking 145 San Francisco SF Dept of Park SF-050030 Ped. Safety & Education Prog. 146 San Francisco SF DPW SF-050010 San Francisco - 16th Street Rehabilitation 147 San Francisco SF DPW SF-050011 San Francisco - Valencia Street Rehabilitation 148 San Francisco SF DPW SF-050020 San Francisco - Various Streets Rehabilitation 149 San Francisco SF DPW SF-050031 Stockton Tunnel Lighting & Ped. Imprv. 150 San Francisco SF DPW SF-050040 San Francisco - Cortland Avenue Rehabilitation 151 San Francisco SF DPW SF-050041 South of Market Various Streets Rehab. 152 San Francisco SF Int Airport SF-070017 Shuttle Bus Clean Air Retrofits 153 San Francisco SFMTA SF-090029 Pedestrian Signal Upgrades 154 San Mateo BART BRT975004 San Francisco Airport Extension 155 San Mateo Caltrain JPB991001 Diridon Stn:Track/Signal/Term Rehab Upgrade 156 San Mateo Caltrain SM-050040 Caltrain: ADA Operating Set-aside 157 San Mateo SamTrans SM-050051 SR 82 - El Camino Real Grand Boulevard Initiative 158 San Mateo San Mateo Co SM-050044 US 101 San Mateo Ramp Metering 159 Solano Benicia SOL010031 Benicia Intermodal Transportation Station 160 Solano Benicia SOL070022 Purchase Bus Shelters 161 Solano Caltrans SOL030006 SR 37/29 Interchange Landscaping 162 Solano Caltrans SOL050003 I-80/I-680 Aux Lanes Improvement Landscaping 163 Solano Caltrans SOL050004 SR 37 Planting Mitigation 164 Solano Caltrans SOL050006 SR 12 - Suisun Valley Rd Bridge Replacement 165 Solano Caltrans SOL070002 I-80 Alamo Creek On-Ramp and Bridge Widening 166 Solano Caltrans SOL070014 I-80/I-680 Mitigation Landscaping 167 Solano Caltrans SOL991103 SR 37 - Napa River to SR 29 Planting Mitigation 168 Solano CCJPA SOL010030 Capitol Corridor - Bahia Viaduct Track Upgrade 169 Solano Dixon SOL030001 Dixon Multimodal Transp. Center 170 Solano Dixon SOL050007 I-80 / Pedrick Road Interchange Modification 171 Solano Dixon SOL050010 SR 113 / I-80 Interchange Reconstruction 172 Solano Dixon SOL050011 I-80 / West A Street Interchange Reconfiguration 173 Solano Dixon SOL070046 SR113 Pedestrian Improvements 174 Solano Dixon SOL970009 I-80/Pitt School Road Interchange 175 Solano Dixon SOL970020 Four Signals on SR-113 176 Solano Fairfield SOL010023 Fairfield - Hilborn Road Rehabilitation 177 Solano Fairfield SOL990023 I-80 North Texas St. I/C Restoration - Phase 1 & 2 178 Solano Fairfield SOL991068 Fairfield Transportation Center-Phase II 179 Solano FHWA SOL030015 San Pablo Bay Entrance Rehabilitation 180 Solano Rio Vista SOL050062 SR12 - Rio Vista Bridge Study 181 Solano Solano County SOL050061 I-80 HOV Lanes Turner Overcrossing 182 Solano Solano County SOL070048 Travis AFB: North Gate Impr. Project 183 Solano STA SOL030003 I-80/I-680/SR12 North Connector 184 Solano STA SOL070020 I-80/I-680/SR 12 Interchange Project 185 Solano Vacaville SOL050060 Alternative Fuel Vehicle (AFV) Incentive Program 186 Solano Vacaville SOL070028 Vacaville Downtown Creekwalk Extension 187 Solano Vacaville SOL070029 Ulatis Creek Bike Path - Allison to I-80 188 Solano Vacaville SOL070047 Peabody Rd & Marshall Rd Pedestrian Improvements 189 Solano Vacaville SOL950024 Vacaville: Bus maintenance facility upgrades 190 Solano Vallejo SOL010027 Vallejo - Lemon Street Rehabilitation 191 Solano Vallejo SOL030026 Vallejo Transit: Replace 3 1995 Paratransit Vans 192 Solano Vallejo SOL050012 Vallejo Curtola Transit Center 193 Solano Vallejo SOL990017 Broadway Widening: Highway 37 to Mini Drive 194 Solano Vallejo SOL990019 SR 37 / Mare Island North Gate Interchange Imps. 195 Sonoma Caltrans SON070026 King Ridge Rd. Bridge Rehab. Project 196 Sonoma Caltrans SON990001 Son 101 HOV - SR 12 to Steele Lane 197 Sonoma SantaRosa Bus SON030011 Santa Rosa Bus: Operating Assistance 198 Sonoma Son Co Transit SON030015 Sonoma County Transit: CNG Bus Purchase 199 Sonoma Son Co Transit SON030016 Two CNG Bus Purchase

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Memos\11_Dec 09 - LSR\[06b_1_Invalid RTP Data Print version.xls]Print versio

LSRWG 120309 - Page 105 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6D

LSRWG 120309 - Page 106 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6D

LSRWG 120309 - Page 107 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6D

ATTACHMENT A

The job description you create is placed online for students to review. Below is an example of a well written description:

Assist with work related to bicycle planning, and pavement markings. Field work, such as bicycle and pedestrian counts, signage inspection, and trip hazard survey. Office work, such as data entry, mapping, and use of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is required. Use writing skills to write general reports, as well as helping with fliers and public notices. If interested student may assist with land use mapping and will have the opportunity to use specialized software, such as Geographic Information System (GIS), AutoCAD (drafting software), and Adobe Illustrator.

LSRWG 120309 - Page 108 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6D Metropolitan Transportation Commission 2010 High School Internship Program Intern Request Form

Instructions: 1) Double click on “xx” and type entry. 2) Email as an attachment to Ann Macaulay at [email protected]

X County: xxCOUNTYxx Agency: xxAGENCYxx Y Name of Person to Supervise Student: xxSUPERVISORxx Title: xxTITLExx Address: xxADDRESSxx City/Zip: xxCITYxx Phone: xxPHONExx Fax: xxFAXxx E-mail Address: xxEMAILxADDRESSxx

Z Location of intern work site, if different from above: Address: xxADDRESSxx City/Zip: xxCITYxx

[ Is the work site accessible by transit? xxYESxNOxx If so, what type of transit? xxTYPExx Walking Distance to transit? xxMILExORxFRACTIONxTHEREOFxx

\ Keep in mind: Jobs providing professional experiences in the field of transportation are given higher priority. Please describe the type of work the intern will be expected to perform; indicate any project(s) the student may work on. This information is important to ensure your agency is matched with a qualified student.

Job Student will be performing (See Attachment A for an example of a well written job description) xxOUTLINExTASKSxINxPARAGRAPHxFORMATxx

] List any minimum requirements or specific skills you would prefer the student to have.

1. xxSKILLxx 2. xxSKILLxx 3. xxSKILLxx

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Memos\11_Dec 09 - LSR\06d_2_MTC 2010 intern request form - SAMPLE.doc

LSRWG 120309 - Page 109 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6D

MTC High School Internship Program Intern Request Form — Page 2

^ Internship Requirement: Student candidates must be interviewed in person or by phone. Please indicate name of person to coordinate or participate in the interview: Name: xxNAMExx Phone: xxPHONExx E-mail Address: xxEMAILxADDRESSxx

AND HUMAN RESOURCES REPRESENTATIVE Name: xxNAMExx Phone: xxPHONExx E-mail Address: xxEMAILxADDRESSxx

_ Please Note: Interns are allocated a maximum of 300 hours to work for the summer. Most students will begin work in mid-June or early July, and continue through the end of August. Students may work full-time or part-time. Students will be paid a prevailing wage; they are not to work overtime and are not allowed to drive a vehicle during work hours or for any work related reason.

If you have specific preferences regarding work hours, please notify MTC prior to the selection and interview process.

¾ Has the agency participated in the MTC’s High School Summer Program? xxYESxNOxx If yes, when? xxDATExx

¾ Is your agency willing to hire additional students on your agency’s payroll? xxYESxNOxx

Name of person authorizing this intern request: xxNAMExx Title: xxTITLExx Phone: xxPHONExx E-mail Address: xxEMAILxADDRESSxx

SUBMIT Intern Request Form in MS Word format to MTC.

Email Intern Request Form to: For more information contact: Name: Ann Macaulay Name: Ann Macaulay Email: [email protected] Phone: 510-817-5741 Email Subject Line: MTC Intern Request Form Email: [email protected]

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership LS&R\_2009 LS&R\09 LSR Memos\11_Dec 09 - LSR\06d_2_MTC 2010 intern request form - SAMPLE.doc

LSRWG 120309 - Page 110 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 6E

LOCAL STREETS & ROADS WORKING GROUP (LSRWG) JANUARY – JUNE 2010 MEETING SCHEDULE - TENTATIVE

All Meetings 1st Thursday of each month (unless otherwise noted)

8:30 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. - STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION REFORM (SPIR) SUBCOMMITTEE 9:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. - LSRWG MTC MetroCenter, 101-8th Street, Oakland 94607 (subject to availability)

Thursday, January 7 Thursday, February 4 (Fishbowl, 3rd Floor) (Fishbowl, 3rd Floor)

Thursday, March 4 Thursday, April 1 (Fishbowl, 3rd Floor) (Fishbowl, 3rd Floor)

Thursday, May 6 Thursday, June 3 (Fishbowl, 3rd Floor) (Fishbowl, 3rd Floor)

LSRWG 120309 - Page 111 of 118 Metropolitan Transportation Commission - Pavement Management Program Page 1 of 4 LS&RWG - 12/07/09: Item 6F

P-TAP PMP Certification

Pavement Management Program Certification Listing

In accordance with section 2108.1 of the Streets and Highway Code, MTC requires cities and counties submitting pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects for funding to utilize a Pavement Management Program (PMP).

Section 2108.1 of the Streets and Highway Codes says:

By July 1, 1990, the City, County, State Cooperation Committee in the department shall develop and adopt a pavement management program to be utilized on local streets or highways that receive funding under the state transportation improvement program. The pavement management program shall be transmitted to every county or city for possible adoption or incorporation into an existing pavement management program. The City, County, State Cooperation Committee shall solicit recommendations from transportation planning agencies and any other entity the committee deems appropriate.

Based on the recommendation of the joint City, County, State Cooperation Committee, the MTC will grant certification to a jurisdiction when all of the following applies:

1. The Pavement Management Program used by the jurisdiction is capable of completing all the following:

z Storing inventory data for all roads within the jurisdiction z Assessing the pavement condition based on distress information z Identifying all pavement sections that need rehabilitation or replacement z Calculating budget needs for rehabilitating or replacing deficient pavement sections

2. The jurisdiction completes all the following:

z Reviews and updates the inventory information for all roads every two years. The review will include checking for road network completeness along with checking for the accuracy of the existing management sections. z Completes inspection of pavement sections for arterial and collector routes in the system every two years, and residential routes every 5 years. z Calculates budget needs for rehabilitating or replacing deficient pavement sections for the current year and the next three years.

To be certified please submit the following to MTC:

1. Your jurisdiction's latest updated pavement management database. If you are not using MTC PMP, please submit items #2 and #3 only. If you are using an MTC PMP software program please submit all files associated with the version of StreetSaver you are using. If you need assistance in accessing these files, please contact your PMP coordinator.

2. The following 3 budget scenarios reports: 1) a report showing sections selected for treatment over the next five years based on your jurisdiction's annual budget estimates, 2) a report showing what would need to be done to maintain your jurisdiction's existing PCI, and 3) a scenario depicting a five-point increase of your jurisdiction's current PCI over the next five years. (These types of reports are typically generated as part of the Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program (P-TAP) projects.)

3. A signed letter by the Public Works Director, or equivalent department head, stating that all of the requirements in parts 1 and 2 above have been met. "Sample letter"

MTC will post certification status updates of Bay Area jurisdictions on this page the first day of every month. The updated certification will have an expiration date two years from the date when the last inspection of arterials and collectors in your network was completed.

Temporary exemptions from the certification process

* A jurisdiction may apply for a one-year extension if the department head submits a letter stating that reinspection will occur within one year. Extensions may not continue beyond three years from the last major inspection date.

** A jurisdiction, whose certification is expiring, may apply for pending status if it is in the process of inspecting its network. You must

LSRWG 120309 - Page 112 of 118 http://www.mtcpms.org/ptap/cert.html 11/30/2009 Metropolitan Transportation Commission - Pavement Management Program Page 2 of 4 LS&RWG - 12/07/09: Item 6F

notify the MTC in writing of your request for pending status, and include a reasonable date when inspections will be completed, or your certification will be considered expired. Jurisdictions who received a pending status because of their participation with the Round-10 had until September 30, 2009 to submit their documentation or be considered expired.

NOTE: Failure to submit your PMP Certification letter and/or extension request by the above deadlines and/or your Certification Expiration Date will result in a lapse in compliance and any Pending status will revert back to its original expiration date.

The information should be forwarded to your PMP Contact.

Last Updated: November 23, 2009

Alameda County Contra Costa County Marin County Napa County San Francisco County

San Mateo County Santa Clara County Solano County Sonoma County

Note: An italicized status represents a certification expected to expire in ~ 60 days.

Alameda County Jurisdiction Last Major Inspection Certified Certification Expiration Date

County of Alameda 03/31/2009 Yes 04/01/2011 Alameda* 03/31/2007 Yes 04/01/2010* Albany* 07/31/2004 Pending Under contract* Berkeley 10/31/2008 Yes 11/01/2010 Dublin 09/30/2007 No 10/01/2009 Emeryville 01/31/2000 No 02/01/2002 Fremont 08/31/2009 Yes 09/01/2011 Hayward 01/31/2009 Yes 02/01/2011 Livermore 04/30/2008 Yes 05/01/2010 Newark* 05/30/2007 Yes 06/01/2010* Oakland 07/31/2008 Yes 08/01/2010 Piedmont 03/31/2009 Yes 04/01/2010 Pleasanton 10/31/2009 Yes 11/01/2011 San Leandro 02/28/2009 Yes 03/01/2011 Union City 11/30/2007 Yes 12/01/2009

» Back to Top

Contra Costa County Jurisdiction Last Major Inspection Certified Certification Expiration Date

Contra Costa County 08/31/2009 Yes 09/01/2011 Antioch 07/31/2008 Yes 08/01/2010 Brentwood 08/31/2009 Yes 09/01/2011 Clayton 04/30/2008 Yes 05/01/2010 Concord 02/28/2009 Yes 03/01/2011 Danville 12/31/2008 Yes 01/01/2011 El Cerrito 12/31/2007 Yes 01/01/2010 Hercules 09/30/2007 No 10/01/2009 Lafayette 01/31/2008 Yes 02/01/2010 Martinez* 07/31/2007 Yes 08/01/2010* Moraga* 06/30/2007 Yes 07/01/2010* Oakley* 06/30/2007 Yes 07/01/2010* Orinda 07/31/2008 Yes 08/01/2010 Pinole 03/31/2008 Yes 04/01/2010 Pittsburg 09/30/2007 No 10/01/2009 Pleasant Hill 01/31/2008 Yes 02/01/2010 Richmond 03/31/2008 Yes 04/01/2010 San Pablo 12/31/2007 Yes 01/01/2010 San Ramon 09/30/2009 Yes 10/01/2011

LSRWG 120309 - Page 113 of 118 http://www.mtcpms.org/ptap/cert.html 11/30/2009 Metropolitan Transportation Commission - Pavement Management Program Page 3 of 4 LS&RWG - 12/07/09: Item 6F

Walnut Creek 08/31/2009 Yes 09/01/2011 » Back to Top

Marin County Jurisdiction Last Major Inspection Certified Certification Expiration Date

Marin County 03/31/2009 Yes 04/01/2011 Belvedere 06/30/2009 Yes 07/01/2011 Corte Madera 09/30/2008 Yes 10/01/2010 Fairfax 04/30/2007 No 05/01/2009 Larkspur 06/30/2009 Yes 07/01/2011 Mill Valley 12/31/2007 Yes 01/01/2010 Novato 12/31/2008 Yes 01/01/2011 Ross 06/30/2009 Yes 07/01/2011 San Anselmo* 02/28/2007 Yes 03/01/2010* San Rafael 02/28/2009 Yes 03/01/2011 Sausalito 09/30/2008 Yes 10/01/2010 Tiburon 09/30/2008 Yes 10/01/2010 » Back to Top

Napa County Jurisdiction Last Major Inspection Certified Certification Expiration Date

Napa County 12/31/2008 Yes 01/01/2011 American Canyon* 01/31/2007 Yes 02/01/2010* Calistoga 12/31/2008 Yes 01/01/2011 Napa 07/31/2009 Yes 08/01/2011 St. Helena 06/30/2007 No 07/01/2009 Yountville 03/31/2009 Yes 04/01/2011 » Back to Top

San Francisco County Jurisdiction Last Major Inspection Certified Certification Expiration Date

San Francisco 08/31/2009 Yes 09/01/2011

Presidio Trust 05/31/2009 Yes 06/01/2011

» Back to Top

San Mateo County Jurisdiction Last Major Inspection Certified Certification Expiration Date San Mateo County 11/30/2008 Yes 12/01/2010 Atherton 09/30/2008 Yes 10/01/2010 Belmont* 07/31/2007 Yes 08/01/2010* Brisbane 01/31/2008 Yes 02/01/2010 Burlingame 09/30/2008 Yes 10/01/2010 Colma 03/31/2008 Yes 04/01/2010 Daly City 04/30/2009 Yes 05/01/2011 East Palo Alto* 06/30/2007 Yes 07/01/2010* Foster City 10/31/2008 Yes 11/01/2010 Half Moon Bay 04/30/2008 Yes 05/01/2010 Hillsborough* 08/31/2007 Yes 09/01/2010* Menlo Park 08/31/2009 Yes 09/01/2011 Millbrae 12/31/2008 Yes 01/01/2011 Pacifica 12/31/2008 Yes 01/01/2011 Portola Valley* 05/31/2006 Pending Under contract* Redwood City 09/30/2008 Yes 10/01/2010 San Bruno 04/30/2009 Yes 05/01/2011 San Carlos 08/31/2008 Yes 09/01/2010 San Mateo 04/30/2008 Yes 05/01/2010 South San Francisco 08/31/2008 Yes 09/01/2010 Woodside 07/31/2007 No 08/01/2009

LSRWG 120309 - Page 114 of 118 http://www.mtcpms.org/ptap/cert.html 11/30/2009 Metropolitan Transportation Commission - Pavement Management Program Page 4 of 4 LS&RWG - 12/07/09: Item 6F

» Back to Top

Santa Clara County Jurisdiction Last Major Inspection Certified Certification Expiration Date

Santa Clara County 09/30/2009 Yes 10/01/2011 Campbell 04/30/2009 Yes 05/01/2011 Cupertino 04/30/2008 Yes 05/01/2010 Gilroy 10/31/2008 Yes 11/01/2010 Los Altos 06/30/2009 Yes 07/01/2011 Los Altos Hills 01/31/2008 Yes 02/01/2010 Los Gatos 07/31/2009 Yes 08/01/2011 Milpitas 03/31/2009 Yes 04/01/2011 Monte Sereno 08/31/2008 Yes 09/01/2010 Morgan Hill 09/30/2008 Yes 10/01/2010 Mountain View 05/31/2008 Yes 06/01/2010 Palo Alto 11/30/2008 Yes 12/01/2010 San Jose 12/31/2007 Yes 01/01/2010 Santa Clara 07/31/2008 Yes 08/01/2010 Saratoga 06/30/2007 No 07/01/2009 Sunnyvale 05/31/2009 Yes 06/01/2011 » Back to Top

Solano County Jurisdiction Last Major Inspection Certified Certification Expiration Date

Solano County* 09/30/2007 Yes 10/01/2010* Benicia 04/30/2008 Yes 05/01/2010 Dixon* 05/30/2007 Yes 06/01/2010* Fairfield 03/31/2008 Yes 04/01/2010 Rio Vista 03/31/2006 Pending Under contract* Suisun City* 03/31/2007 Yes 04/01/2010* Vacaville 02/28/2009 Yes 03/01/2011 Vallejo 09/30/2008 Yes 10/01/2010

» Back to Top

Sonoma County Jurisdiction Last Major Inspection Certified Certification Expiration Date

Sonoma County 05/25/2005 Pending Under contract* Cloverdale 07/31/2008 Yes 07/31/2010 Cotati 11/30/2008 Yes 12/01/2010 Healdsburg 01/31/2008 Yes 02/01/2010 Petaluma 04/30/2009 Yes 05/01/2011 Rohnert Park 02/28/2008 Yes 03/01/2010 Santa Rosa 05/31/2007 No 06/01/2009 Sebastopol 06/30/2007 No 07/01/2009 Sonoma 06/30/2009 Yes 07/01/2011 Windsor 09/30/2008 Yes 10/01/2010 » Back to Top

(*) Indicates Extended Date

Contact PMP | Access Information | About Us Go To the MTC Site

LSRWG 120309 - Page 115 of 118 http://www.mtcpms.org/ptap/cert.html 11/30/2009 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 7A

TO: Local Streets and Roads Working Group DATE: December 3, 2009 FR: Marcella Aranda

RE: Caltrans Division of Local Assistance Web Update Announcements (DLAWUA)

Caltrans Division of Local Assistance has posted program updates/announcements to their website at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/. Jurisdictions are encouraged to review the bulletins for program changes.

If you have any questions regarding the posted bulletins, please contact the Caltrans Local Assistance staff referenced in the respective bulletin.

LSRWG 120309 - Page 116 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 7A

From: Frank Cao To: Date: 11/18/09 11:54 AM Subject: [DLAWUA] Announcement: FHWA/Caltrans Local Oversight Action PlanFFY2009 (LOAP)

Announcement: The FHWA/Caltrans Local Oversight Action Plan FFY2009 (LOAP) has been posted to the Local Assistance website at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/Reports_db.htm

Change: The purpose of the LOAP(FFY2009) is to identify and consolidate significant Caltrans and Local Agency activities, roles, and responsibilities using the Local Assistance Procedures Manual(LAPM) as a guide. In FFY2010, the remaining chapters of the LAPM, not included in LOAP(FFY2009), will be addressed.

Impacts: Applicable to all local agency Federal-aid projects.

Contact: Questions or comments regarding this change should be directed to: Eugene Shy at (916) 651-6552 or [email protected].

Frank Cao Sr. Transportation Engineer, Ph.D. ITS Coordinator Division of Local Assistance, HQ Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916-653-0341 CALNET 453-0341 Fax: 916-654-2409

______DLA-Website-Updates-Announce mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dot.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/dla-website-updates-announce

LSRWG 120309 - Page 117 of 118 LS&RWG - 12/03/09: Item 7A

From: Frank Cao To: CC: Eugene Shy Date: 11/10/09 10:56 AM Subject: [DLAWUA] Announcement: New COIN #4--DO NOT USE LOCAL HIRING PREFERENCES

Announcement: A new Construction Oversight Information Notice (COIN) has been posted to the Local Assistance website at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/COIN/index.htm

Change: COIN #4 "DO NOT USE LOCAL HIRING PREFERENCES" alerts local agencies that local hiring practices cannot be used on Federal-aid projects.

Impacts: Applicable to all local agency Federal-aid projects.

Contact: Questions or comments regarding this change should be directed to: Eugene Shy at (916) 651-6552 or [email protected].

Eugene R. Shy, PE Process Review Engineer, Sr. TE Division of Local Assistance, Caltrans HQ Tel. (916) 651-6552 Fax. (916) 654-2409

______DLA-Website-Updates-Announce mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dot.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/dla-website-updates-announce

LSRWG 120309 - Page 118 of 118