DOCSLIB.ORG

Explain the Similarities and Differences Between Viruses and Living

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Explain the Similarities and Differences Between Viruses and Living Module 2B –Viruses– Viruses Objective # 9 Viruses are not complete living organisms. They are smaller and simpler in structure than even the Explain the similarities and simplest prokaryotic cells. differences between viruses However, because they have some and living organisms. characteristics of life, they are important subjects of research for biologists. 1 2 Objective 9 Objective # 10 Like living organisms, viruses contain Describe the structure of a genetic instructions. However, they lack the machinery needed to carry out typical virus. Be sure to these instructions. discuss the following: On their own, they are inert chemicals and cannot perform any life functions. nucleic acid core, protein However, if they enter a living host coat or capsid, envelope, cell, they can use the cell’s machinery to replicate. viralviral--specificspecific enzymes. 3 4 Objective 10 Objective 10 A virus consists of a nucleic acid core All viruses contain at least 2 parts: surrounded by a protective coat. 1) Nucleic acid core or Genome Here is a photo of the Influenza virus: ¾ May be DNA or RNA but not both ¾ Usually only 1 or 2 molecules ¾ DNA or RNA may be linear or circular, and either single-single-strandedstranded or double-double-strandedstranded ¾ Functions as the genetic material 5 6 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Objective 10 Objective 10 2) Protein coat or Capsid Viruses with helical and icosahedral capsids: ¾ Surrounds and protects the nucleic RNA acid core Capsid DNA ¾ Composed of one or a few proteins repeated many times Structure ¾ Shape is usually helicalor icosahedralicosahedral.. Capsid An icosahedron may look spherical on lower power, but is actually composed Virus Plant virus (TMV) Animal virus (Adenovirus) Viral shape Helical capsid Icosahedral capsid of 20 equilateral triangular facets: 7 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 8 Objective 10 Head DNA Complex ¾ Some viruses have a complex capsid Capsid (protein sheath) capsid of a with binal (two(two--fold)fold) symmetry that is TT--eveneven phage Collar neither purely icosahedral nor helical consists of an Tail ¾ For examppple, the capsid of T-T-eveneven Whiskers icosahedral bacteriophages consists of a head that head attached is an elongated icosahedron attached to a helical tail to a tail that is helical. Tail fibers and a with tail fibers base plate are also present: and base plate Base plate Tail fiber 9 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 10 Permission required for reproduction or display. Objective 10 Objective 10 In addition to a genome and capsid, some viruses also have: 4) Viral- Viral-specificspecific enzymes 3) Envelope ¾ Enzymes the virus needs, but that ¾ Surrou nds the caps id are not supplied by the host cell ¾ ¾ Rich in lipids, proteins, and glycolipids Coded by the viral genome ¾ ¾ Derived from the host’s cell Stored inside the capsid membrane, but also contains proteins coded by viral genes 11 12 2 Envelope protein Viral Diversity Envelope VIRUS VIRUS Flavivirus VIRUS Poliovirus VIRUS Adenovirus (causes VIRUS Influenza 30 nm yellow BACTERIUM HIV 75 nm Streptococcus 100 nm fever) VIRUS 110 nm 22 nm 1 µm Rabies VIRUS 125 nm Herpes simplex Capsid 150 nm VIRUS Poxvirus PROTEIN 250 nm VIRUS Hemoglobin T2 bacteriophage 15 nm 65 nm BACTERIUM Viral-specific EUKARYOTE E. coli Yeast cell 2 mm long Enzyme 7 mm long RNA Enveloped virus Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 13 14 Objective # 11 Objective 11 Head Bacteriophages, DNA called phages Capsid Explain what a bacteriophage (protein sheath) for short, are is, and be able to name and Collar viruses that Tail describe the 2 types of infect bacteria. Whiskers reproductive cycles found in bacteriophages. Base plate Tail fiber 15 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 16 Permission required for reproduction or display. Objective 11 Two types of reproductive cycles are found in bacteriophages: 1) Lytic cycle: ¾ Phage exists free in the host cell’s cytoplasm. ¾ Phage replicates and the new phages are released by lysis(bursting) of the host cell. 17 18 3 Objective 11 Lytic Cycle Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Attachment: virus attaching Bacterial to cell wall chromosome Bacteriophage Penetration: 2) Lysogenic cycle: viral DNA injected ¾ Phage DNA is integrated into the into cell Life Cycles host cell’s DNA. Release: lysis of cell Lysogenic Cycle ¾ Integration of genome PPageDNcahage DNA can re ma in inact actveadive and Synthesis: ldleads to prop hage protein and Propagation of nucleic acid be replicated along with the host prophage along with DNA for many generations. host genome ¾ Under certain conditions, phage will Cell stress Reproduction of enter lytic cycle and lyse the host lysogenic bacteria Assembly: involves Induction: prophage exits the spontaneous assembly of bacterial chromosome, viral genes cell. 19 capsid and enzyme to insert DNA are expressed Objective # 12 Objective 12 One group of animal viruses are the Describe the life cycle of a retrovirusesretroviruses.. representative animal virus, such Retroviruses are enveloped viruses that as HIV. have an RNA genome. Once inside a host cell, they use thethe enzyme reverse transcriptase to make a DNA copy of their RNA genome. HIV is an example of a retrovirus. 21 22 23 24 4 25 26 27 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inhibition of Chloroplast DNA Recombination and Repair by Dominant Negative Mutants of Escherichia Coli Reca
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Center for Plant Science Innovation Plant Science Innovation, Center for June 1995 Inhibition of Chloroplast DNA Recombination and Repair by Dominant Negative Mutants of Escherichia coli RecA Heriberto D. Cerutti University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Anita M. Johnson Duke University, Durham, North Carolina John E. Boynton Duke University, Durham, North Carolina Nicholas W. Gillham Duke University, Durham, North Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/plantscifacpub Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Cerutti, Heriberto D.; Johnson, Anita M.; Boynton, John E.; and Gillham, Nicholas W., "Inhibition of Chloroplast DNA Recombination and Repair by Dominant Negative Mutants of Escherichia coli RecA" (1995). Faculty Publications from the Center for Plant Science Innovation. 8. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/plantscifacpub/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant Science Innovation, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Center for Plant Science Innovation by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, June 1995, p. 3003–3011 Vol. 15, No. 6 0270-7306/95/$04.0010 Copyright q 1995, American Society for Microbiology Inhibition of Chloroplast DNA Recombination and Repair by Dominant Negative Mutants of Escherichia coli RecA HERIBERTO CERUTTI, ANITA M. JOHNSON, JOHN E. BOYNTON,* AND NICHOLAS W. GILLHAM Developmental, Cell and Molecular Biology Group, Departments of Botany and Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Received 7 December 1994/Returned for modification 12 January 1995/Accepted 28 February 1995 The occurrence of homologous DNA recombination in chloroplasts is well documented, but little is known about the molecular mechanisms involved or their biological significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Prophage Gene Revealed Population Variation Of
    Evaluation of Prophage Gene Revealed Population Variation of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter Asiaticus’: Bacterial Pathogen of Citrus Huanglongbing (HLB) in Northern Thailand Jutamas Kongjak Chiang Mai University Angsana Akarapisan ( [email protected] ) Chiang Mai University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0506-8675 Research Article Keywords: Citrus, Prophage, Bacteriophage, Huanglongbing, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Posted Date: August 24th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-822974/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/15 Abstract ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ is a non-culturable bacterial pathogen, the causal agent of Huanglongbing (HLB, yellow shoot disease, also known as citrus greening disease), a highly destructive disease of citrus (Rutaceae). The pathogen is transmitted by the Asian citrus psyllid: Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Recent studies, have shown that the HLB pathogen has two prophages, SC1 that has a lytic cycle and SC2 associated with bacterial virulence. This study aimed to search for SC1 and SC2 prophages of HLB in mandarin orange, sweet orange, bitter orange, kumquat, key lime, citron, caviar lime, kar lime, pomelo and orange jasmine from ve provinces in Northern Thailand. A total of 216 samples collected from Northern Thailand during 2019 and 2020 were studied. The results revealed that 62.04% (134/216) citrus samples were infected with the ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ the bacterial pathogen associated with citrus HLB. The prophage particles are important genetic elements of bacterial genomes that are involved in lateral gene transfer, pathogenicity, environmental adaptation and interstrain genetic variability. Prophage particles were evaluated in the terminase gene of SC1 and SC2-type prophages.
    [Show full text]
  • P1 Bacteriophage and Tol System Mutants
    P1 BACTERIOPHAGE AND TOL SYSTEM MUTANTS Cari L. Smerk A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2007 Committee: Ray A. Larsen, Advisor Tami C. Steveson Paul A. Moore Lee A. Meserve ii ABSTRACT Dr. Ray A. Larsen, Advisor The integrity of the outer membrane of Gram negative bacteria is dependent upon proteins of the Tol system, which transduce cytoplasmic-membrane derived energy to as yet unidentified outer membrane targets (Vianney et al., 1996). Mutations affecting the Tol system of Escherichia coli render the cells resistant to a bacteriophage called P1 by blocking the phage maturation process in some way. This does not involve outer membrane interactions, as a mutant in the energy transucer (TolA) retained wild type levels of phage sensitivity. Conversely, mutations affecting the energy harvesting complex component, TolQ, were resistant to lysis by bacteriophage P1. Further characterization of specific Tol system mutants suggested that phage maturation was not coupled to energy transduction, nor to infection of the cells by the phage. Quantification of the number of phage produced by strains lacking this protein also suggests that the maturation of P1 phage requires conditions influenced by TolQ. This study aims to identify the role that the TolQ protein plays in the phage maturation process. Strains of cells were inoculated with bacteriophage P1 and the resulting production by the phage of viable progeny were determined using one step growth curves (Ellis and Delbruck, 1938). Strains that were lacking the TolQ protein rendered P1 unable to produce the characteristic burst of progeny phage after a single generation of phage.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Prophage Mu DNA Upon Induction (Bacteriophage Mu/Bacteriophage X/DNA Insertion/DNA Excision/Transposable Elements) E
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 74, No. 8, pp. 3143-3147, August 1977 Biochemistry State of prophage Mu DNA upon induction (bacteriophage Mu/bacteriophage X/DNA insertion/DNA excision/transposable elements) E. LjUNGQUIST AND A. I. BUKHARI Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724 Communicated by J. D. Watson, April 18, 1977 ABSTRACT We have compared the process of prophage different host sequences. Yet, a form of Mu DNA free of host A induction with that of prophage Mu. According to the DNA has remained undetected. Campbell model, rescue of A DNA from the host DNA involves In its continuous association with host DNA, Mu resembles reversal of X integration such that the prophage DNA is excised from the host chromosome. We have monitored this event by another class of insertion elements, referred to as the trans- locating the prophage DNA with a technique in which DNA of posable elements. The transposable elements are specific the lysogenic cells is cleaved with a restriction endonuclease stretches of DNA that can be translocated from one position to and fractionated in agarose gels. The DNA fragments are de- another in host DNA (7). Mu undergoes multiple rounds of natured in gels, transferred to a nitrocellulose paper, and hy- transposition during its growth, far exceeding the transposition bridized with 32P-labeled mature phage DNA. The fragments frequency of the bonafide transposable elements. When a Mu containing prophage DNA become visible after autoradiogra- lysogen, carrying a single Mu prophage at a given site on the phy. Upon prophage A induction, the phage-host junction fragments disappear and the fragment containing the A att site host chromosome, is induced, many copies of Mu DNA are appears.
    [Show full text]
  • Philympics 2021: Prophage Predictions Perplex Programs
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.03.446868; this version posted June 3, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Philympics 2021: Prophage 2 Predictions Perplex Programs 3 Michael J. Roach1*, Katelyn McNair2, Sarah K. Giles1, Laura Inglis1, Evan Pargin1, Przemysław 4 Decewicz3, Robert A. Edwards1 5 1. Flinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, Flinders University, 5042, SA, Australia 6 2. Computational Sciences Research Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, 92182, CA, USA 7 3. Department of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty 8 of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02-096, Poland 9 10 *Corresponding Author: [email protected] 11 12 Abstract 13 Most bacterial genomes contain integrated bacteriophages—prophages—in various states of decay. 14 Many are active and able to excise from the genome and replicate, while others are cryptic 15 prophages, remnants of their former selves. Over the last two decades, many computational tools 16 have been developed to identify the prophage components of bacterial genomes, and it is a 17 particularly active area for the application of machine learning approaches. However, progress is 18 hindered and comparisons thwarted because there are no manually curated bacterial genomes that 19 can be used to test new prophage prediction algorithms. 20 Here, we present a library of gold-standard bacterial genome annotations that include manually 21 curated prophage annotations, and a computational framework to compare the predictions from 22 different algorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • First Description of a Temperate Bacteriophage (Vb Fhim KIRK) of Francisella Hispaniensis Strain 3523
    viruses Article First Description of a Temperate Bacteriophage (vB_FhiM_KIRK) of Francisella hispaniensis Strain 3523 Kristin Köppen 1,†, Grisna I. Prensa 1,†, Kerstin Rydzewski 1, Hana Tlapák 1, Gudrun Holland 2 and Klaus Heuner 1,* 1 Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Cellular Interactions of Bacterial Pathogens, ZBS 2, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (G.I.P.); [email protected] (K.R.); [email protected] (H.T.) 2 Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy, ZBS 4, Robert Koch Institute, D-13353 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-30-18754-2226 † Both authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Here we present the characterization of a Francisella bacteriophage (vB_FhiM_KIRK) includ- ing the morphology, the genome sequence and the induction of the prophage. The prophage sequence (FhaGI-1) has previously been identified in F. hispaniensis strain 3523. UV radiation induced the prophage to assemble phage particles consisting of an icosahedral head (~52 nm in diameter), a tail of up to 97 nm in length and a mean width of 9 nm. The double stranded genome of vB_FhiM_KIRK contains 51 open reading frames and is 34,259 bp in length. The genotypic and phylogenetic analysis indicated that this phage seems to belong to the Myoviridae family of bacteriophages. Under the Citation: Köppen, K.; Prensa, G.I.; conditions tested here, host cell (Francisella hispaniensis 3523) lysis activity of KIRK was very low, and Rydzewski, K.; Tlapák, H.; Holland, the phage particles seem to be defective for infecting new bacterial cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Model for the Transposition and Replication of Bacteriophage
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 1933-1937, April 1979 Genetics Molecular model for the transposition and replication of bacteriophage Mu and other transposable elements (DNA insertion elements/nonhomologous recombination/site-specific recombination/replicon fusion/topoisomerases) JAMES A. SHAPIRO Department of Microbiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 Communicated by Hewson Swift, December 11, 1978 ABSTRACT A series of molecular events will explain how B genetic elements can transpose from one DNA site to another, B y generate a short oligonucleotide duplication at both ends of the I % new insertion site, and replicate in the transposition process. I These events include the formation of recombinant molecules A a% /; C which have been postulated to be intermediates in the trans- position process. The model explains how the replication of bacteriophage Mu is obligatorily associated with movement to z x x new genetic sites. It postulates that all transposable elements replicate in the transposition process so that they remain at their z original site while moving to new sites. According to this model, the mechanism of transposition is very different from the in- V sertion and excision of bacteriophage X. y FIG. 1. Replicon fusion. The boxes with an arrow indicate copies Recent research on transposable elements in bacteria has pro- of a transposable element. The letters mark arbitrary regions of the vided important insights into the role of nonhomologous re- two replicons to indicate the relative positions of the elements in the combination in genetic rearrangements (1-4). These elements donor and cointegrate molecules. include small insertion sequences (IS elements), transposable resistance determinants (Tn elements), and bacteriophage Mu results in the duplication of a short oligonucleotide sequence (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Module1: General Concepts
    NPTEL – Biotechnology – General Virology Module1: General Concepts Lecture 1: Virus history The history of virology goes back to the late 19th century, when German anatomist Dr Jacob Henle (discoverer of Henle’s loop) hypothesized the existence of infectious agent that were too small to be observed under light microscope. This idea fails to be accepted by the present scientific community in the absence of any direct evidence. At the same time three landmark discoveries came together that formed the founding stone of what we call today as medical science. The first discovery came from Louis Pasture (1822-1895) who gave the spontaneous generation theory from his famous swan-neck flask experiment. The second discovery came from Robert Koch (1843-1910), a student of Jacob Henle, who showed for first time that the anthrax and tuberculosis is caused by a bacillus, and finally Joseph Lister (1827-1912) gave the concept of sterility during the surgery and isolation of new organism. The history of viruses and the field of virology are broadly divided into three phases, namely discovery, early and modern. The discovery phase (1886-1913) In 1879, Adolf Mayer, a German scientist first observed the dark and light spot on infected leaves of tobacco plant and named it tobacco mosaic disease. Although he failed to describe the disease, he showed the infectious nature of the disease after inoculating the juice extract of diseased plant to a healthy one. The next step was taken by a Russian scientist Dimitri Ivanovsky in 1890, who demonstrated that sap of the leaves infected with tobacco mosaic disease retains its infectious property even after its filtration through a Chamberland filter.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Groups: Viruses (C) 1988, American Biological Safety Association
    Rev.: 1.0 Risk Groups: Viruses (c) 1988, American Biological Safety Association BL RG RG RG RG RG LCDC-96 Belgium-97 ID Name Viral group Comments BMBL-93 CDC NIH rDNA-97 EU-96 Australia-95 HP AP (Canada) Annex VIII Flaviviridae/ Flavivirus (Grp 2 Absettarov, TBE 4 4 4 implied 3 3 4 + B Arbovirus) Acute haemorrhagic taxonomy 2, Enterovirus 3 conjunctivitis virus Picornaviridae 2 + different 70 (AHC) Adenovirus 4 Adenoviridae 2 2 (incl animal) 2 2 + (human,all types) 5 Aino X-Arboviruses 6 Akabane X-Arboviruses 7 Alastrim Poxviridae Restricted 4 4, Foot-and- 8 Aphthovirus Picornaviridae 2 mouth disease + viruses 9 Araguari X-Arboviruses (feces of children 10 Astroviridae Astroviridae 2 2 + + and lambs) Avian leukosis virus 11 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 3 (wild strain) + (ALV) 3, (Rous 12 Avian sarcoma virus Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 sarcoma virus, + RSV wild strain) 13 Baculovirus Viral vector/Animal virus 1 + Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 14 Barmah Forest 2 A Arbovirus) 15 Batama X-Arboviruses 16 Batken X-Arboviruses Togaviridae/ Alphavirus (Grp 17 Bebaru virus 2 2 2 2 + A Arbovirus) 18 Bhanja X-Arboviruses 19 Bimbo X-Arboviruses Blood-borne hepatitis 20 viruses not yet Unclassified viruses 2 implied 2 implied 3 (**)D 3 + identified 21 Bluetongue X-Arboviruses 22 Bobaya X-Arboviruses 23 Bobia X-Arboviruses Bovine 24 immunodeficiency Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 3 (wild strain) + virus (BIV) 3, Bovine Bovine leukemia 25 Viral vector/Animal retrovirus 1 lymphosarcoma + virus (BLV) virus wild strain Bovine papilloma Papovavirus/
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Viroids and Prions
    Harriet Wilson, Lecture Notes Bio. Sci. 4 - Microbiology Sierra College Introduction to Viroids and Prions Viroids – Viroids are plant pathogens made up of short, circular, single-stranded RNA molecules (usually around 246-375 bases in length) that are not surrounded by a protein coat. They have internal base-pairs that cause the formation of folded, three-dimensional, rod-like shapes. Viroids apparently do not code for any polypeptides (proteins), but do cause a variety of disease symptoms in plants. The mechanism for viroid replication is not thoroughly understood, but is apparently dependent on plant enzymes. Some evidence suggests they are related to introns, and that they may also infect animals. Disease processes may involve RNA-interference or activities similar to those involving mi-RNA. Prions – Prions are proteinaceous infectious particles, associated with a number of disease conditions such as Scrapie in sheep, Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) or Mad Cow Disease in cattle, Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in wild ungulates such as muledeer and elk, and diseases in humans including Creutzfeld-Jacob disease (CJD), Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome (GSS), Alpers syndrome (in infants), Fatal Familial Insomnia (FFI) and Kuru. These diseases are characterized by loss of motor control, dementia, paralysis, wasting and eventually death. Prions can be transmitted through ingestion, tissue transplantation, and through the use of comtaminated surgical instruments, but can also be transmitted from one generation to the next genetically. This is because prion proteins are encoded by genes normally existing within the brain cells of various animals. Disease is caused by the conversion of normal cell proteins (glycoproteins) into prion proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpesviral Latency—Common Themes
    pathogens Review Herpesviral Latency—Common Themes Magdalena Weidner-Glunde * , Ewa Kruminis-Kaszkiel and Mamata Savanagouder Department of Reproductive Immunology and Pathology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima Str. 10, 10-748 Olsztyn, Poland; [email protected] (E.K.-K.); [email protected] (M.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 January 2020; Accepted: 14 February 2020; Published: 15 February 2020 Abstract: Latency establishment is the hallmark feature of herpesviruses, a group of viruses, of which nine are known to infect humans. They have co-evolved alongside their hosts, and mastered manipulation of cellular pathways and tweaking various processes to their advantage. As a result, they are very well adapted to persistence. The members of the three subfamilies belonging to the family Herpesviridae differ with regard to cell tropism, target cells for the latent reservoir, and characteristics of the infection. The mechanisms governing the latent state also seem quite different. Our knowledge about latency is most complete for the gammaherpesviruses due to previously missing adequate latency models for the alpha and beta-herpesviruses. Nevertheless, with advances in cell biology and the availability of appropriate cell-culture and animal models, the common features of the latency in the different subfamilies began to emerge. Three criteria have been set forth to define latency and differentiate it from persistent or abortive infection: 1) persistence of the viral genome, 2) limited viral gene expression with no viral particle production, and 3) the ability to reactivate to a lytic cycle. This review discusses these criteria for each of the subfamilies and highlights the common strategies adopted by herpesviruses to establish latency.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Virus Ontology; Coordinating Across Databases
    viruses Article Bacterial Virus Ontology; Coordinating across Databases Chantal Hulo 1, Patrick Masson 1, Ariane Toussaint 2, David Osumi-Sutherland 3, Edouard de Castro 1, Andrea H. Auchincloss 1, Sylvain Poux 1, Lydie Bougueleret 1, Ioannis Xenarios 1 and Philippe Le Mercier 1,* 1 Swiss-Prot group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CMU, University of Geneva Medical School, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; [email protected] (C.H.); [email protected] (P.M.); [email protected] (E.d.C.); [email protected] (A.H.A.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (I.X.) 2 University Libre de Bruxelles, Génétique et Physiologie Bactérienne (LGPB), 12 rue des Professeurs Jeener et Brachet, 6041 Charleroi, Belgium; [email protected] 3 European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +41-22379-5870 Academic Editors: Tessa E. F. Quax, Matthias G. Fischer and Laurent Debarbieux Received: 13 April 2017; Accepted: 17 May 2017; Published: 23 May 2017 Abstract: Bacterial viruses, also called bacteriophages, display a great genetic diversity and utilize unique processes for infecting and reproducing within a host cell. All these processes were investigated and indexed in the ViralZone knowledge base. To facilitate standardizing data, a simple ontology of viral life-cycle terms was developed to provide a common vocabulary for annotating data sets. New terminology was developed to address unique viral replication cycle processes, and existing terminology was modified and adapted.
    [Show full text]