DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting Agenda 20-23 April 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting Agenda 20-23 April 2004 ICES-Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics, Science and Technology Meeting Agenda 20-23 April 2004 DRAFT (8 April 2004) Sea Fisheries Institute (Demel Room) Gdynia, Poland Dr David Demer, USA, Chair April 20th 0900 Opening: host greeting, adoption of agenda, selection of rapporteur FAST Topic 1: Effectiveness of noise-reduced platforms (topic discussion leaders: Alex De Robertis and Ian H. McQuinn) 0930 Ron Mitson (presented by Paul G. Fernandes). “Underwater noise; a brief history of noise in fisheries.” (topic review) 1000 Paul G. Fernandes, Andrew S. Brierley, and F. Armstrong. “Examination of herring at the surface of the North Sea.” 1020 Coffee break 1040 Grazyna Grelowska and Ignacy Gloza. “The acoustic transmissions of a moving ship and a grey seal.” 1100 Pall Reynisson. “Noise reduced vessels; the Icelandic experience.” 1120 Janusz Burczynski. “New Deployment Options for Digital Sonar.” 1140 Martyn Simmons or Steve Goodwin. “TONES - an overview” 1200 Lunch 1330 Ron Mitson (presented by D. Van Holliday). “Does ICES CRR 209 need revision?” 1350 Discussion (topic discussion leaders: Alex De Robertis and Ian H. McQuinn) FAST Topic 2: Using acoustics for evaluating ecosystem structure, with emphasis on species identification (topic discussion leaders: Rudy Kloser and Rolf Korneliussen) 1430 John Horne. “Challenges and trends in acoustic species identification.” (topic review) 1500 Coffee break 1520 Michael Jech and William Michaels. “Multi-frequency analyses of acoustical survey data.” 1540 Paul G. Fernandes. “Determining the quality of a multifrequency identification algorithm.” 1600 A. Mair and Paul G. Fernandes. “Examination of plankton samples in relation to multifrequency echograms.” 1620 Valerie Mazauric and Laurent Berger. “The numerical tool OASIS for echograms simulation.” 1640 Valerie Mazauric and John Dalen. “A Multibeam Echosounder and a Multibeam Sonar based on Simrad’s new Scientific Multibeam Systems.” 1710 Rolf J. Korneliussen. “Recommendations for collection of acoustic multi-frequency data to be used for generation of combined-frequency data.” 1730 Adjourn TBD “Status on the ER60/EK60 and further plans” April 21st FAST Topic 2 (continued): Using acoustics for evaluating ecosystem structure, with emphasis on species identification (topic discussion leaders: Rudy Kloser and Rolf Korneliussen) 0900 Rolf J. Korneliussen, Egil Ona, Hans P. Knudsen, K. Røang, I. K. Elliassen, Y. Heggelund and D. Patel. “KORONA; a toolbox for acoustic categorisation and species identification.” 0920 Rolf J. Korneliussen, Egil Ona, and Natalia Gorska. “Verified acoustic identification of Atlantic mackerel.” 0940 Kjell Kr. Olsen and Geir Antonsen. “Broadband echo signals used for species identification.” 1000 James H. Churnside, David A. Demer, John R. Hunter, Jr., and David A. Griffith. “Improved efficiency in direct sampling and species identification by incorporating LIDAR into echo sounder and trawl surveys.” 1020 Coffee break 1040 Rudy Kloser, Nick Mortimer and Tim Ryan. “Echo-system to ecosystem, progress and challenges to date.” 1100 Anne Lebourges-Dhaussy, “TBD” 1120 Discussion (topic discussion leaders: Rudy Kloser and Rolf Korneliussen) 1200 Lunch FAST Topic 3: Topic 3 Statistical characterisation and utilisation of target strength. (topic discussion leaders: John Horne and Gavin Macaulay) 1330 David Demer, Stéphane Conti, and Andrew Brierley. “Considering target strength as a stochastic variable.” (topic review) 1400 Joanna Szczucka. “Diel vertical migration and target strength variability observed via multi- hour echosounding conducted at a fixed point.” 1420 Marek Moszyski, Krzysztof Bikonis, and Andrzej Stepnowski. “Virtual reality 3D visualisation of fish movement from split-beam data.” 1440 Geir Pedersen and Egil Ona. “Calibration of split-beam echo sounders; models for beam pattern correction.” 1500 Coffee Break 1520 Xianyong Zhao. “Depth dependence of the target strength of anchovy measured in situ.” 1540 Egil Ona, I. Svellingen, J.E. Fosseidengen, and R. Pedersen. ”Seasonal variability in the acoustic target strength of cod.” 1600 Hector Peña A. “Target strength investigations on Chilean Jack Mackerel (Trachurus symmetricus murphyi) from commercial vessels equipped with a scientific echosounder.” 1620 Pavel Gasyukov and Svetlana M. Kasatkina, “Sensitivity study of some methods of target strength equation parameters estimation.” 1640 Discussion (topic discussion leaders: John Horne and Gavin Macaulay) 1730 Adjourn April 22nd 0900 FAST/FTFB Opening FAST/FTFB Joint Session Topic 1: The questions raised at the ICES Symposium on Fish Behaviour in Exploited Ecosystems, held in Bergen in June 2003. 0920 Steve Walsh, “The questions raised at the ICES Symposium on Fish Behaviour in Exploited Ecosystems, held in Bergen in June 2003.” 0940 Discussion FAST/FTFB Joint Session Topic 2: Methods for estimating abundance of semi-demersal species, including combining trawl and acoustic estimates 1000 Andrzej Orlowski. “Acoustic revision of fish distribution and its correlation to environmental factors in the demersal zone.” 1020 Coffee break 1040 Ian H. McQuinn and Pierre Nellis. “A combined acoustic/trawl survey of lake (Acipenser fulvescens) and Atlantic (A. oxyrhynchus) sturgeon." 1100 Noël Diner and Laurent Berger. “Trawled layers echo-integration: a tool for improving fish identification by a trawl.” 1120 Carla Scalabrin, Patrick Danel and Laurent Berger. “Relationship between bottom trawl results and acoustic density estimates of trawled sample volume.” 1140 Svetlana M. Kasatkina. “Some methodological problems of quantitative assessment of semi- pelagic fishes (by the example of icefish survey results).” 1200 Lunch 1330 Discussion FAST/FTFB Joint Session Topic 3: Methods to observe fish behaviour in relation to fishing gears. 1400 Alex De Robertis and Christopher Wilson, “Do walleye pollock react to trawling operations?” 1420 Yvan Simard and Nathalie Roy. “Distant shipping noise: Should fish care?” 1440 Discussion 1500 Coffee break 1520 TBD. “Report from the SG on survey gears for use in southern and western areas.” 1550 Ken Weinberg, “Variations in trawl geometry due to unequal warp length.” 1610 Stan Kotwiki, “The effect of autotrawl on the bottom – tending performance of a survey trawl.” 1630 AOB; recommendations and conclusion 1730 Adjourn April 23rd FAST Topic 4: Error assessment for acoustic biomass estimates (topic discussion leader: John Simmonds) 0900 David Demer. “Estimating uncertainty in acoustical surveys.” (topic review) 0920 Cathy Goss. “Sources of uncertainty in annual surveys for Antarctic krill.” 0940 Dezhang Chu, Peter H. Wiebe, Gareth L. Lawson, Nancy J. Copley. “Error assessment for acoustic biomass estimates.” 1000 Robert Kieser and Lars Nonboe Andersen. “Signal processing at low sample rate and its possible effect on EK60 calibration, TS measurement and resampling of its sample data.” 1020 Coffee break 1040 Tim Ryan and Rudy Kloser. “Improving the precision of ES60 and EK60 echo sounder applications.” 1100 John Simmonds. “Spatial effort allocation for a complex survey objective.” 1120 Discussion (topic discussion leader: John Simmonds) 1200 Lunch 1330 Discussion continued (topic discussion leader: John Simmonds) 1350 John Anderson. “Review of the report of the Study Group on Acoustic Seabed Classification (SGASC).” 1410 Bill Karp. “Review of the report of the Study Group on Acoustics on Fishing Vessels (SGAFV).” 1430 Bo Lundgren. “Review of the report of the Study Group on Baltic Herring TS (SGTSEB).” 1440 David Reid. “Review of the report of the Planning Group on HAC common data exchange format (PGHAC).” 1500 Coffee Break 1520 2005 WGFAST; ToR and venue. 1540 ICES ASC Theme Sessions; 2004-2007. 1610 2007 Symposium on Fisheries Acoustics and Complementary Assessment Technologies; title, topics, committee, and venue. 1700 AOB; recommendations and conclusion 1730 Adjourn .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Significance of Beating Observed in Earthquake Responses of Buildings
    SIGNIFICANCE OF BEATING OBSERVED IN EARTHQUAKE RESPONSES OF BUILDINGS Mehmet Çelebi1, S. Farid Ghahari2, and Ertuğrul Taciroǧlu2 U.S. Geological Survey1 and University of California, Los Angeles2 Menlo Park, California, USA1 and Los Angeles, California, USA2 Abstract The beating phenomenon observed in the recorded responses of a tall building in Japan and another in the U.S. are examined in this paper. Beating is a periodic vibrational behavior caused by distinctive coupling between translational and torsional modes that typically have close frequencies. Beating is prominent in the prolonged resonant responses of lightly damped structures. Resonances caused by site effects also contribute to accentuating the beating effect. Spectral analyses and system identification techniques are used herein to quantify the periods and amplitudes of the beating effects from the strong motion recordings of the two buildings. Quantification of beating effects is a first step towards determining remedial actions to improve resilient building performance to strong earthquake induced shaking. Introduction In a cursory survey of several textbooks on structural dynamics, it can be seen that beating effects have not been included in their scopes. On the other hand, as more earthquake response records from instrumented buildings became available, it also became evident that the beating phenomenon is common. As modern digital equipment routinely provide recordings of prolonged responses of structures, we were prompted to visit the subject of beating, since such response characteristics may impact the instantaneous and long-term shaking performances of buildings during large or small earthquakes. The main purpose in deploying seismic instruments in buildings (and other structures) is to record their responses during seismic events to facilitate studies understanding and assessing their behavior and performances during and future strong shaking events.
    [Show full text]
  • Echo Eliminator Ceiling & Wall Panels
    Echo Eliminator Ceiling & Wall Panels Echo Eliminator, or Bonded Acoustical Cotton (B.A.C.), is the most cost-effective acoustical absorbing material on the market. It is a high-performance panel manufactured from recycled cotton, and is ideal for noise control applications. Echo Eliminator can easily be installed as acoustical wall panels or hanging baffles. • No VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) • No formaldehyde, requires no warning labels • Fungi-, mold-, and mildew-resistant • Class A Fire Rated (Non-flammable per ASTM E-84) ACOUSTICAL SURFACES, INC. CELEBRATING 35 YEARS – SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION SPECIALISTS! ™ 952.448.5300 • 800.448.0121 • [email protected] • www.acousticalsurfaces.com Echo Eliminator APPLICATIONS Residential, commercial, industrial; schools, restaurants, classrooms, Ceiling & Wall Panels houses of worship, community centers, offices, conference rooms, music rooms, recording studios, theaters, public spaces, medical facilities, audi- toriums, arenas/stadiums, warehouses, manufacturing plants, and more. Acoustics and Expected Performance: Absorbing sound and reducing echo / reverberation can be challeng- ing. Echo Eliminator offers a high Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC) to reduce the amount of sound within a room. One-inch thick panels are appropriate for areas wher e the main issue is understanding speech. Rooms with more mid-and-low frequency noise, or where music is present, benefit from using two-inch thick panels. SIZES & OPTIONS Standard Size: 24" x 48" (minimum quantities apply, call for details); options: 12" x 12", 24" x 24", 48" x 48", 48" x 96". Note: All sizes are nominal and subject to manufacturing tolerances that may vary +/- 1/8". Thickness/Density: 1" thick / 3 lb. per cubic foot (pcf); 1" thick/6 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Can You Reflect Sound? ECHO TUBE
    Exhibit Sheet Can you reflect sound? ECHO TUBE (Type) Ages Topic Time Science 7-14 Sound <10 mins background Skills used Observation, Curiosity Overview for adults Echo Tube is a 15 metre hollow tube. When you shout or make a sound into the tube, it is reflected off the end of the tube and comes back to you. You hear this as an echo. The tube has two flaps within it that you can open or close, changing the length of the tube and the length of time it takes the echo to bounce back to you. What’s the science? Sound travels through the air as sound waves. When these sound waves meet a surface, they are reflected back to where they came from. Sound travels at 330 meters per second in air, which is much slower than light. This means that when light is reflected, we see its reflection instantly but when sound is reflected, we can hear the delay as an echo. The surface that the sound bounces off doesn’t have to be solid. The echo tube is open at both ends. The air pressure inside the tube is higher than the air pressure outside. When the sound wave meets the open end of the tube, this change in pressure causes a wave to be reflected down the tube from the open end. Science in your world Echoes from the open ends of tubes are what make musical instruments such as horns and trumpets work. The sound wave reflects up and down the tube from the open ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Halo Insulation Work As Soundproofing?
    Does Halo Insulation Work as Soundproofing? You’re probably familiar with Halo’s strengths as an insulation product that slashes energy costs by keeping room temperatures at a comfortable level. But what about noise control — can Halo also add comfort by reducing sound transmission? It turns out that it can, although Halo’s performance as a soundproofing material is not as impressive as its array of thermal benefits. This post will talk about the several ways in which Halo’s products can be used to manage sound in a building. Managing Sound Transmission vs. Echo © 2018 Logix Insulated Concrete Forms LTD | 855-350-4256 (HALO) Does Halo Insulation Work as Soundproofing? Soundproofing and sound absorption are 2 distinct processes. Soundproofing means blocking soundwaves from traveling from one space to the next, whereas sound absorption refers to reducing echo. One of the ways to soundproof a space is by decoupling the partition. This practice requires two layers of solid material — gypsum, concrete, or glass — with an air gap between them. The solid layer facing the sound’s origin acts as a conductor to the soundwaves until they reach the air cavity, interrupting the waves’ direct path. This way, the soundwaves are far weaker when they reach the solid layer on the other side of the partition. Unfortunately, decoupling alone is not enough to block soundwaves of all frequencies. That’s why other strategies, like adding mass, damping the partitions, and improving absorption, are crucial to sound control. Absorption, for instance, boosts the soundproofing performance of decoupled walls and improves the sound quality in the space from which the noise is coming.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrast Echo on Evaluation of Cardiac Function – Basic Principles
    Contrast echo and evaluation of cardiac function: basic principles Y. Yotov University Hospital “St.Marina” Varna, Bulgaria EAE Teaching Corse, 5-7 April 2012, Sofia, Bulgaria Contrast in echocardiography: Why? • To delineate the endocardium by cavity opacification. – for assessment of global and regional systolic function, LV volumes and ejection fraction. – LV opacification (LVO) for improved visualisation of structural abnormalities – enhanced visualisation of wall thickening during stress echocardiography • To enhance Doppler flow signals from the cavities and great vessels. • To determine myocardial ischaemia and viability using myocardial perfusion contrast echocardiography (MCE) • Quantification of the coronary flow reserve, which has prognostic value in various disease conditions TISSUE: Incident frequency results in equal and opposite vibration (i.e. LINEAR RESPONSE) MICROBUBBLES: Can only become so small but can expand to a greater degree, resulting in unequal oscillation (i.e. NON-LINEAR RESPONSE) This results in asymmetrical vibrations which produce harmonic frequencies http://www.escardio.org/communities/EAE/contrast-echo-box/ TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING Principles of Contrast echocardiography Blood appears black on conventional two dimensional echocardiography, not because blood produces no echo, but because the ultrasound scattered by red blood cells at conventional imaging frequencies is very weak—several thousand times weaker than myocardium—and so lies below the displayed dynamic range. Stewart MJ. Heart. 2003; 89(3): 342–348. • It is a remarkable coincidence that gas bubbles of a size required to cross the pulmonary capillary vascular bed (1–5 mm) resonate in a frequency range of 1.5–7 MHz, precisely that used in diagnostic ultrasound. Stewart MJ. Heart. 2003; 89(3): 342–348.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Radio Frequency Echo Using Frequency Sweeping and Power Analysis Amar Zeher, Stéphane Binczak, Jerome Joli
    Characterization of Radio Frequency Echo using frequency sweeping and power analysis Amar Zeher, Stéphane Binczak, Jerome Joli To cite this version: Amar Zeher, Stéphane Binczak, Jerome Joli. Characterization of Radio Frequency Echo using fre- quency sweeping and power analysis. 2014 IEEE REGION 10 TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM, Apr 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pp.356-360, 10.1109/TENCONSpring.2014.6863057. hal-01463734 HAL Id: hal-01463734 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01463734 Submitted on 17 Feb 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Characterization of Radio Frequency Echo Using Frequency Sweeping and Power Analysis Amar Zeher Stephane´ Binczak Jerome´ Joli LE2I CNRS UMR 6306, Laboratory LE2I CNRS UMR 6306, SELECOM, Universite´ de Bourgogne, Universite´ de Bourgogne, ZA Alred Sauvy, 9 avenue Alain Savary, BP47870 9 avenue Alain Savary, BP47870 66500 Prades, France. 21078 Dijon cedex, France 21078 Dijon cedex, France Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Abstract—Coupling between repeater’s antennas, called Radio as Wiener Filter, Linear Prediction [4] or Non-linear Acoustic Frequency Echo (RFE) deteriorates signal quality and compro- Echo Cancellation Based on Volterra Filters [5].
    [Show full text]
  • The Suppression of Selected Acoustic Noise Frequencies In
    The Suppression of Selected Acoustic Noise Frequencies in MRI by XINGXIAN SHOU Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Adviser: Robert W. Brown, Ph.D. Department of Physics CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2011 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of ______________________________________________________XINGXIAN SHOU candidate for the ________________________________degreePh.D. *. (signed)_______________________________________________Robert W. Brown (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________Jeffrey Duerk ________________________________________________David Farrell ________________________________________________Harsh Mathur ________________________________________________Shmaryu Shvartsman ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________July 26, 2010 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. To my parents Jun Shou, Huiqin Bian and my fiancée Shuofen Li ii Table of Contents Chapter 1 An Overview of Magnetic Resonance Imaging ....................................................... 1 1.1 What Is MRI? .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Principles of Magnetic Resonance Imaging .................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Spin Precession and Larmor Frequency ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Echo Barrier
    Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. We Identify and SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ● Suite 201 ● Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 ● Fax (952) 448-2613 ● (800) 448-0121 Email: [email protected] Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com Sound Transmission Obscuring Products Soundproofing, Acoustics, Noise & Vibration TM Control Specialists We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problems Echo Barrier™ The Industry’s First Reusable, Indoor/ Outdoor Noise Barrier/Absorber • Superior acoustic performance • Industrial durability • Simple and quick installation system • Lightweight for easy handling • Unique roll-up design for compact storage and transportation • Double or triple up for noise ‘hot spots’ • Ability to add branding or messages • Range of accessories available • Weatherproof – absorbs sound but not water • Fire retardant • 1 person can do the job of 2 or 3 people Why is it all too often we see construction sites with fencing but no regard for sound issues created from the construction that is taking place? This is due to the fact that there has not been an efficient means of treating this type of noise that was cost effective until now. Echo Barrier temporary fencing is a reusable, outdoor noise barrier. Designed to fit on all types of temporary fencing. Echo Barrier absorbs sound while remaining quick to install, light to carry and tough to last. BENEFITS: Echo Barrier can help reduce noise complaints, enhance your company reputation, extend site operating hours, reduce project timescales & costs, and improve working conditions. APPLICATIONS: Echo Barrier works great for construction & demolition sites; rail maintenance & replacement; music, sports and other public events; road construction; utility/maintenance sites; loading and unloading areas; outdoor gun ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Nuclear Fuel Rod Testing Technique Using the Ultrasonic Resonance Phenomena
    KR9700258 KAERI/RR-1680/96 Development of Nuclear Fuel Rod Testing Technique Using the Ultrasonic Resonance Phenomena 29 - 0 j KAERI/RR-1680/96 Development of Nuclear Fuel Rod Testing Technique Using the Ultrasonic Resonance Phenomena M -? ts ffl % fir 1997 \i 2 € I7°i HEXT PA6E(S) left BLANK i. ^^pressurized water reactor: PWR)H 300 7fl^ ^^.^^-^(fuel bundle)!-^- ^ 200 <^7fl^ <23.-g-(fuel rod)^)-, ^ -^- :t.# fA5. ^^^i^-. ^S-^^r UO2 €3!, Zircaloy-4 ^ 4^:(cladding tube), #3^(plenum) >i^^ -f-^.^ ice inspection: ISI)°fl, 3-Z\3L 2iA}jL*]ig(post-irradiation examination: PIE) -f-ofl iii °) . H2flAi ^^(resonance scattering) , o] III. Ml* 3! ^^(acoustic resonance scattering: ARS)^ , O.?)JL 2 mm 7}< iation examination facility: PIEF)^ iv 4. (multilayered) ^"°fl £ 71*113. 7}^% S)^-^, 2)^-^4 « Afo^ 7^(gap)oH , ( ultrasound spectroscopy system: RUSS)# ^W. S.^:, ^^^ fl-S^l ^^-^ (leak-defective fuel rod detection system: LFRDS)- IV. £^ ^nr S!! ^(global matrix approach)^- M i?i#-i- a^7fl ^l(boundary matrix)"S VE ^, -2.^- ^Jfl^l-^ tfl^ ^l D-3 *!!•-£ (background) ^£-§- ^3* t}±= #£# A .Bnj^-1- 0>A}(analogous) -f oflHn]T^o] zero-frequency limit 3. cfl^s}-^ 3Mt)-. o] -n-^1 €^ zero-frequency limit 5.^ o] ^I, "JL-^afl^(inherent background)"AS. ai-fVti|) VI 1H tfl^ n 3J4 33-31 Oj AJ^ i^^S 5LEH turn table 4 2(x, y) ^ slide unit, monostatic pulse-echo bi-static pulse- echo «o^ 1.2 <>l*fl 3(x, y, z) ^ slide unit, A at 4. vii ISSXT FAGE(S) left BLANK SUMMARY I. Project Title Development of Nuclear Fuel Rod Inspection Technique Using Ultrasonic Resonance Phenomena II.
    [Show full text]
  • Book O Chapter 2 Sound PPT 2015.Pdf
    The Nature of Sound The blending of pitches through interference produces an instrument’s A. Sound quality B. Amplitude C. Echoes D. Resonance The blending of pitches through interference produces an instrument’s A. Sound quality B. Amplitude C. Echoes D. Resonance Longitudinal wave caused by vibrations and carried through a medium A. Sound wave B. Standing wave C. Overtones D. Tinnitus Longitudinal wave caused by vibrations and carried through a medium A. Sound wave B. Standing wave C. Overtones D. Tinnitus An echo is most likely to result when sound hits a surface that is A. Bumpy and lumpy B. Smooth and hard C. Smooth and soft D. Bumpy and soft An echo is most likely to result when sound hits a surface that is A. Bumpy and lumpy B. Smooth and hard C. Smooth and soft D. Bumpy and soft The motion of either the listener or the source of a sound causes A. Resonance B. Shock waves C. Echolocation D. The Doppler effect The motion of either the listener or the source of a sound causes A. Resonance B. Shock waves C. Echolocation D. The Doppler effect The amplitude of a sound’s waves determines the sound’s A. Pitch B. Sound quality C. Resonance D. Loudness The amplitude of a sound’s waves determines the sound’s A. Pitch B. Sound quality C. Resonance D. Loudness Frequencies two or more times the fundamental frequency A. Amplitude B. Echolocation C. Overtones D. Decibel Frequencies two or more times the fundamental frequency A. Amplitude B. Echolocation C. Overtones D.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourier Spectrum Pulse-Echo for Acoustic Characterization
    Fourier Spectrum Pulse-Echo for Acoustic Characterization Barnana Pal Saha Institute of nuclear Physics, Condensed Matter Physics Division, 1/AF, Bidhannagar, Kolkata-700064, India. e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Ultrasonic wave attenuation(α) measurement by pulse-echo method exhibits pronounced dependence on experimental conditions. It is shown to be an inherent characteristic of the method itself. Estimation of α from the component wave amplitudes in the frequency scale gives more accurate and consistent value. This technique, viz., the Fourier Spectrum Pulse-Echo (FSPE) is demonstrated to determine the ultrasonic velocity(v) and attenuation constant(α) in ultrapure de-ionized water at room temperature (250C) at 1MHz and 2 MHz wave frequency. Keywords: Fourier transform, pulse echo method, ultrasonic propagation constants. 1. Introduction: Fourier transform spectroscopic techniques in experimental research have been growing at a faster rate during past five decades only because of the fact that higher precision and better accuracy in measurement can be achieved from frequency domain analysis compared to that obtained from corresponding time domain measurements. Development of Fourier transform (FT) Raman spectroscopy [1,2], Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) [3], Fourier Transform Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (FTNMR) [4] are examples which are still in the process of further refinement. In the field of ultrasonics such attempts are rare though present day research on acoustic characterization of materials demand better accuracy and precision. More specifically, accuracy in the measurement of ultrasonic attenuation constant (α) is relatively poor and depends very much on experimental conditions. The dependence of α on experimental condition has been explained clearly in recent theoretical studies [5].
    [Show full text]
  • “The Alchemy of Tone”
    3 “The Alchemy of Tone” Jörg Mager and Electric Music Still more revealing would be a history of musical instruments written, not (as it always is) from the technical standpoint of tone-production, but as a study of the deep spiritual bases of the tone-colors and tone-effects aimed at.1 —Oswald Spengler During the same July 1926 festival in Donaueschingen where the sounds of “mechanical music” were unleashed upon the world, an inventor named Jörg Mager demonstrated a remarkable new instrument. He played a curious device consisting of an L-shaped handle that he turned on its axis around a semicircular metal panel; as the handle moved, a connected loudspeaker emitted a keening, disembodied tone that glided and swooped, sounding either out of tune or otherworldly. This device— the Spherophone—was intended to usher in a new kind of music based on microtonal pitch increments discernable to the ear but unattainable by most instruments. Though it was overshadowed by the more sen- sational concerts for mechanical piano and the Schlemmer-Hindemith Triadic Ballet, Mager’s demonstration of the Spherophone sent tremors through the audience. The journalist Herbert Weiskopf perceived in the instrument a phenomenon of profound significance for the history of music: “We do not wish to abandon ourselves to utopias,” he wrote, “but in this case the oft-misused term ‘epoch-making’ seems to be ap- propriate.” In his view, the Spherophone promised nothing less than the “alteration of the entire process of musical listening.”2 Paul Hindemith 52 “The Alchemy of Tone” | 53 noted that the Spherophone was still in an early stage of development 1 but declared it “the most revolutionary invention in the field of musical 2 instruments” and expressed his eagerness to compose for it.3 3 At the time of his 1926 demonstration in Donaueschingen, Mager’s 4 instrument was virtually the only one of its kind in Germany.
    [Show full text]