DOCSLIB.ORG

Populist Parties in Germany, France, and the UK: Growing Support for a Radical Rejection of Globalization?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Populist Parties in Germany, France, and the UK: Growing Support for a Radical Rejection of Globalization? International ResearchScape Journal Volume 3 Article 4 2015 Populist Parties in Germany, France, and the UK: Growing Support for a Radical Rejection of Globalization? Linda Brandt Bowling Green State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/irj Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, Other French and Francophone Language and Literature Commons, Other German Language and Literature Commons, Other Political Science Commons, Political History Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Brandt, Linda (2015) "Populist Parties in Germany, France, and the UK: Growing Support for a Radical Rejection of Globalization?," International ResearchScape Journal: Vol. 3 , Article 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25035/irj.03.01.04 Available at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/irj/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in International ResearchScape Journal by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Brandt: Populist Parties in Germany, France, and the UK Brandt 1 Populist Parties in Germany, France, and the UK: Growing Support for a Radical Rejection of Globalization? Linda Brandt International Studies Major Faculty Mentor: Irina Stakhanova 2015 Published by ScholarWorks@BGSU, 2015 International ResearchScape Journal, Vol. 3 [2015], Art. 4 Brandt 2 Abstract A mere look at electoral results on both the national and European level of many European countries shows that populist and right-wing parties’ support has been growing extensively. The French Front National (FN), which has made significant strides since Marine Le Pen took over the party’s leadership, is often seen as on the forefront of this movement, and is deemed to be a core part of the contemporary European extreme right. Although their individual agendas and rhetoric differ from that of the FN, the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and the German Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany, AfD) are often placed in the same party family. Disregarding this hotly debated terminology, however, this paper seeks to identify specific differences and overlaps among the three parties. Examining specific agenda points, most prominently their anti-immigration rhetoric and stance toward the EU, the party programs are used as a starting point to assess to what extent the three parties can justifiably be classified as part of an anti-globalization movement. Prior to examining the parties’ positions concerning specific issues, an influx in immigration, increased integration into the European Union, resulting in a transfer of some national powers to the supranational level, as well as growing xenophobia, Islamophobia, and anti-Americanism have sometimes been identified as consequences of globalization; negative attitudes toward this development, increased nationalism, and policy proposals designed to halt these effects were deemed as highly indicative of a radical rejection of globalization. Following a comparative analysis of the three parties’ positions, the discussion shows that the French “Front National” fulfills the given criteria to a much greater extent than the other two, and its ethnic-based, Francocentric rhetoric is much more extreme than that of its counterparts. Nevertheless, a future radicalization in the UK and Germany is conceivable, particularly since Islamophobia is especially pronounced in the three countries under investigation, and as refugee crises in the Mediterranean Sea are leading to an increased foreign presence in said countries, perhaps sparking similar ethnic intolerance as is propagated by the FN. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/irj/vol3/iss1/4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25035/irj.03.01.04 Brandt: Populist Parties in Germany, France, and the UK Brandt 3 Introduction & Rationale The issue of increasing political support for right-wing parties in Europe is important because it signals a distressing dissatisfaction with the current political system. It is especially important that such a movement, primarily directed against the cultural elements of globalization, is forming in Europe, where citizens of all member states benefit from freedom of movement and numerous other advantages of European integration. But clearly, national and regional identities have not been superseded by a common European identity, and thus continue to play an important role in national politics, especially in the language used by right-wing parties. Additionally, overcrowding and other negative effects associated with immigration, as well as the 2008 financial crisis, have further sown doubts about the European project. As a result, this project seeks to analyze to what extent a select few parties could be considered a part of this movement against globalization. In general, radical right-wing parties are continuing to cement their support in many European democracies, with France’s aggressive Front National (FN) being on the forefront of the discussion about this development. Up until recently, Germany was thought to be the exception to Europe-wide radicalization with extreme right-wing parties’ limited electoral successes contained to subnational levels and vocal anti-immigration and anti-EU positions less visible at the national level. This changed in 2013, when the Alternative for Germany AfD, a newly formed party, campaigned for a fundamental reorganization of the Eurozone and has since made headlines for expressing sympathy for supporters of the German Pegida movement. Likewise, UKIP, vocal about drastically reducing immigration and known for its anti-EU rhetoric, has made electoral advances in UK elections in the last few years. Published by ScholarWorks@BGSU, 2015 International ResearchScape Journal, Vol. 3 [2015], Art. 4 Brandt 4 Undoubtedly, FN, UKIP and AfD differ significantly regarding their histories, political agendas and party structures. In fact, FN is widely regarded as a right-wing party1, while UKIP’s and the AfD’s membership in the far-right Populist Party family is more contested2. Nevertheless, they share many similarities in that they have emerged as a strong opposition force to established parties in the mainstream and consider themselves to be the true voice of the people. An in-depth analysis of policy positions is thus necessary to assess to what extent these parties’ platforms can be deemed a radical reaction to globalization. Indicators for such a response would primarily be calls for far-reaching limits on immigration and Islamophobic rhetoric. Additionally, Euro- skepticism as an emerging ideology must also be examined in its varying appearances, with anti- American sentiments examined as another possible manifestation of anti-globalization attitudes. Methodology The present study relies heavily on qualitative approaches, as its primary goal is to compare the three parties’ positions on immigration, and to assess whether they can be deemed Islamophobic or racist, whether Euro-skepticism is a pervasive characteristic, and whether anti-American sentiment can be observed. Thus, in addition to secondary source material, the study draws from the parties’ own websites and interviews with their leader to gain a better understanding of the parties’ standpoints on said issues. Regarding the French Front National, there is more reliance on interviews and secondary sources, as their website is not published in English. However, quantitative data is also included in order to examine how the three countries’ public support for said issues compares to the parties themselves, and whether anti-globalization sentiments are https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/irj/vol3/iss1/4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25035/irj.03.01.04 Brandt: Populist Parties in Germany, France, and the UK Brandt 5 restricted to populist parties or more pervasively observable among the general public. This part of the analysis draws from Eurobarometer surveys and other polling agencies’ data. Literature Review Much has been written about the French Front National (FN), while the UK Independence Party (UKIP) has only lately received significant popularity, and the German Alternative for Germany (Alternative für Deutschland, AfD) itself is only just over two years old. Taking these developments into account, I will attempt to provide a balanced summary and analysis of books and journal articles addressing each one of the three parties and their connection to globalization. Edward G. DeClair’s Politics on the Fringe: The People, Policies, and Organization of the French National Front examines the party’s voter base and agenda in detail. Exploring the Front’s agenda, the author argues that “the party has modified its political message to profit from a growing sense of French anxiousness about the country’s political and economic future”3, while asserting that reducing the party’s political agenda to the sole issue of immigration does not hold up in light of “detailed, face-to-face interviews with the core leadership of the Front (145).” DeClair not only explores which issues are important to the Front, but also analyzes to what extent the party’s claim to “really say what all French men and women are actually thinking” (117) holds true by contrasting important issues identified by the Front’s elite with the French public’s views according to Euro-Barometer. Even though his chart shows that the public’s view differs significantly from the Front’s on some issues, the author is correct
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and the Quasi-War with France
    John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and the Quasi-War with France David Loudon General University Honors Professor Robert Griffith, Faculty Advisor American University, Spring 2010 1 John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and the Quasi-War with France Abstract This paper examines the split of the Federalist Party and subsequent election defeat in 1800 through the views of John Adams and Alexander Hamilton on the Quasi-War with France. More specifically, I will be focusing on what caused their split on the French issue. I argue that the main source of conflict between the two men was ideological differences on parties in contemporary American politics. While Adams believed that there were two parties in America and his job was to remain independent of both, Hamilton saw only one party (the Republicans), and believed that it was the goal of all “real” Americans to do whatever was needed to defeat that faction. This ideological difference between the two men resulted in their personal disdain for one another and eventually their split on the French issue. Introduction National politics in the early American republic was a very uncertain venture. The founding fathers had no historical precedents to rely upon. The kind of government created in the American constitution had never been attempted in the Western World; it was a piecemeal system designed in many ways more to gain individual state approval than for practical implementation. Furthermore, while the fathers knew they wanted opposition within their political system, they rejected political parties as evil and dangerous to the public good. This tension between the belief in opposition and the rejection of party sentiment led to confusion and high tensions during the early American republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany: Baffled Hegemon Constanze Stelzenmüller
    POLICY BRIEF Germany: Baffled hegemon Constanze Stelzenmüller Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, Germany has transformed into a hegemonic power in Europe, but recent global upheaval will test the country’s leadership and the strength of its democracy. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY are challenging Europe’s cohesion aggressively, as does the Trump administration’s “America First” The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 turned reunified policy. The impact of this on Germany is stark. No Germany into Europe’s hegemon. But with signs of country in Europe is affected so dramatically by this a major global downturn on the horizon, Germany new systemic competition. Far from being a “shaper again finds itself at the fulcrum of great power nation,” Germany risks being shaped: by events, competition and ideological struggle in Europe. And competitors, challengers, and adversaries. German democracy is being challenged as never before, by internal and external adversaries. Germany’s options are limited. It needs to preserve Europe’s vulnerable ecosystem in its own The greatest political challenge to liberal democracy enlightened self-interest. It will have to compromise within Germany today is the Alternative für on some issues (defense expenditures, trade Deutschland (Alternative for Germany, or AfD), the surpluses, energy policy). But it will also have to first far-right party in the country’s postwar history push back against Russian or Chinese interference, to be represented in all states and in the federal and make common cause with fellow liberal legislature. While it polls nationally at 12 percent, its democracies. With regard to Trump’s America, disruptive impact has been real.
    [Show full text]
  • Asylum-Seekers Become the Nation's Scapegoat
    NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 14 Number 2 Volume 14, Numbers 2 & 3, 1993 Article 7 1993 TURMOIL IN UNIFIED GERMANY: ASYLUM-SEEKERS BECOME THE NATION'S SCAPEGOAT Patricia A. Mollica Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mollica, Patricia A. (1993) "TURMOIL IN UNIFIED GERMANY: ASYLUM-SEEKERS BECOME THE NATION'S SCAPEGOAT," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 14 : No. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol14/iss2/ 7 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. TURMOIL IN UNIFIED GERMANY: ASYLUM-SEEKERS BECOME THE NATION'S SCAPEGOAT I. INTRODUCTION On November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall fell, symbolizing the end of a divided German state. The long dreamed-of unification finally came to its fruition. However, the euphoria experienced in 1989 proved ephemeral. In the past four years, Germans have faced the bitter ramifications of unity. The affluent, capitalist West was called on to assimilate and re-educate the repressed communist East. Since unification, Easterners have been plagued by unemployment and a lack of security and identity, while Westerners have sacrificed the many luxuries to which they have grown accustomed. A more sinister consequence of unity, however, is the emergence of a violent right-wing nationalist movement. Asylum- seekers and foreigners have become the target of brutal attacks by extremists who advocate a homogenous Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Registered Political Party Or Independent Total
    Final Results 2016 GLA ELECTIONS ELECTION OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY MEMBERS Declaration of Results of Poll I hereby give notice as Greater London Returning Officer at the election of the London Wide Assembly Members held on 5th May 2016 that the number of votes recorded at the election is as follows: - Name of Registered Political Party or Independent Total Votes Animal Welfare Party 25810 Britain First - Putting British people first 39071 British National Party 15833 Caroline Pidgeon's London Liberal Democrats 165580 Christian Peoples Alliance 27172 Conservative Party 764230 Green Party - "vote Green on orange" 207959 Labour Party 1054801 Respect (George Galloway) 41324 The House Party - Homes for Londoners 11055 UK Independence Party (UKIP) 171069 Women's Equality Party 91772 Total number of good votes 2615676 The number of ballot papers rejected was as follows:- (a) Unmarked 18842 (b) Uncertain 1127 (c) Voting for too many 9613 (d) Writing identifying voter 145 (e) Want of official mark 6 Total 29733 And I do hereby declare that on the basis of the total number of London votes cast for each party and number of constituency seats they have gained, the eleven London Member seats have been allocated and filled as follows. Seat Number Name of Registered Political Party or Independent 1 Green Party - "vote Green on orange" 2 UK Independence Party (UKIP) 3 Caroline Pidgeon's London Liberal Democrats 4 Conservative Party 5 Conservative Party 6 Labour Party 7 Green Party - "vote Green on orange" 8 Labour Party 9 Conservative Party 10 Labour Party
    [Show full text]
  • German Divergence in the Construction of the European Banking Union
    The End of Bilateralism in Europe? An Interest-Based Account of Franco- German Divergence in the Construction of the European Banking Union Honorable Mention, 2019 John Dunlop Thesis Prize Christina Neckermann May 2019 M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series | No. 119 The views expressed in the M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government or of Harvard University. The papers in this series have not undergone formal review and approval; they are presented to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government Weil Hall | Harvard Kennedy School | www.hks.harvard.edu/mrcbg The End of Bilateralism in Europe?: An Interest-Based Account of Franco-German Divergence in the Construction of the European Banking Union A thesis presented by Christina Neckermann Presented to the Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree with honors Harvard College March 2019 Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction 3 Statement of question and motivation - 3 Banking Union in the era of postcrisis financial reforms - 6 Outline of content and argument - 11 Chapter II: Theoretical Approach 13 Review of related literature - 13 Proposed theoretical framework - 19 Implications in the present case - 21 Methodology - 26 Chapter III: Overview of National Banking Sectors
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Eastern Germany's Far-Right Intellectuals I EUROPP
    16.02.2021 Introducing eastern Germany's far-right intellectuals I EUROPP Q Biog Team February 11 th, 2020 Introducing eastern Germany's far-right intellectuals O comments Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On 5 February, Thomas Kemmerich of the FreeDemocratic Party {FDP) was elected as Minister President of Thuringia with thehelp of the Alternative for Germany {AfD). Sabine Volk explains that the incident, which has generated a heated reaction in Germany, highlights the role of far-right groups in shaping public debate in eastern Germany. Following the AfD's coup in Thuringia and the resulting political earthquake in German party politics, eastern Germany has once again moved into the spotlight of national debates on rising far-right populism. I have recently conducted research in the region, where far- https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2020/02/11/introducing-eastern-germanys-far-right-intellectuals/ 1/8 16.02.2021 Introducing eastern Germany's far-right intellectuals I EUROPP right subcultures have been able to establish themselves, providing a platform for far-right debate and networking. Once in a blue moon, a public bus goes to Schnellroda, a tiny township in the eastern German federal state of Saxony-Anhalt. About fifty kilometres from Saxony's buzzing student city of Leipzig, and some thirty kilometres away from the city of Halle, the location of an anti­ Semitic terrorist attack in October last year, this remote place is the embodiment of 'the middle of nowhere'. Yet, Germany's far-right scene usually spares no effort to gather in Schnellroda. It is here that Germany's leading far-right intellectual, Gotz Kubitschek, his so-called Institute for State Politics (lfS), and his publishing house Antaiosreside.
    [Show full text]
  • British National Party: the Roots of Its Appeal Contents Contents About the Authors 4 TABLES and FIGURES
    The BNP: the roots of its appeal Peter John, Helen Margetts, David Rowland and Stuart Weir Democratic Audit, Human Rights Centre, University of Essex Published by Democratic Audit, Human Rights Centre, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, and based on research carried out at the School of Public Policy, University College London, The Rubin Building, 29-30 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9QU.The research was sponsored by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, The Garden House, Water End, York YO30 6WQ. Copies of the report may be obtained for £10 from the Trust office. Democratic Audit is a research organisation attached to the Human Rights Centre at the University of Essex. The Audit specialises in auditing democracy and human rights in the UK and abroad and has developed a robust and flexible framework for democracy assessment in cooperation with the inter-governmental International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), Stockholm. The Audit carries out periodic research projects as part of its longitudinal studies of British democracy. The latest audit of the UK, Democracy under Blair, is published by Politico’s. University College London’s Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy is focused on graduate teaching and research, and offers an environment for the study of all fields of politics, including international relations, political theory and public policy- making and administration 2 The British National Party: the roots of its appeal Contents Contents About the Authors 4 TABLES AND FIGURES
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Unwanted Nation: the Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository BUILDING AN UNWANTED NATION: THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP AND AUSTRIAN PROPONENTS OF A SEPARATE NATIONHOOD, 1918-1934 Kevin Mason A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by: Advisor: Dr. Christopher Browning Reader: Dr. Konrad Jarausch Reader: Dr. Lloyd Kramer Reader: Dr. Michael Hunt Reader: Dr. Terence McIntosh ©2007 Kevin Mason ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Kevin Mason: Building an Unwanted Nation: The Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934 (Under the direction of Dr. Christopher Browning) This project focuses on American and British economic, diplomatic, and cultural ties with Austria, and particularly with internal proponents of Austrian independence. Primarily through loans to build up the economy and diplomatic pressure, the United States and Great Britain helped to maintain an independent Austrian state and prevent an Anschluss or union with Germany from 1918 to 1934. In addition, this study examines the minority of Austrians who opposed an Anschluss . The three main groups of Austrians that supported independence were the Christian Social Party, monarchists, and some industries and industrialists. These Austrian nationalists cooperated with the Americans and British in sustaining an unwilling Austrian nation. Ultimately, the global depression weakened American and British capacity to practice dollar and pound diplomacy, and the popular appeal of Hitler combined with Nazi Germany’s aggression led to the realization of the Anschluss .
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study on the United Kingdom and Brexit Juliane Itta & Nicole Katsioulis the Female Face of Right-Wing Populism and Ex
    Triumph of The women? The Female Face of Right-wing Populism and Extremism 02 Case study on the United Kingdom and Brexit Juliane Itta & Nicole Katsioulis 01 Triumph of the women? The study series All over the world, right-wing populist parties continue to grow stronger, as has been the case for a number of years – a development that is male-dominated in most countries, with right-wing populists principally elected by men. However, a new generation of women is also active in right-wing populist parties and movements – forming the female face of right-wing populism, so to speak. At the same time, these parties are rapidly closing the gap when it comes to support from female voters – a new phenomenon, for it was long believed that women tend to be rather immune to right-wing political propositions. Which gender and family policies underpin this and which societal trends play a part? Is it possible that women are coming out triumphant here? That is a question that we already raised, admittedly playing devil’s advocate, in the first volume of the publication, published in 2018 by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Triumph of the women? The Female Face of the Far Right in Europe. We are now continuing this first volume with a series of detailed studies published at irregular intervals. This is partly in response to the enormous interest that this collection of research has aroused to date in the general public and in professional circles. As a foundation with roots in social democracy, from the outset one of our crucial concerns has been to monitor anti-democratic tendencies and developments, while also providing information about these, with a view to strengthening an open and democratic society thanks to these insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectre of Hate An Explanatory Guide to the Far Right in the UK
    SPECTRE OF HATE An Explanatory Guide to the Far Right in the UK Part of the Cordoba Manuals Series March 2015. ISSN 2048-7711 The Cordoba Foundation is an independent strategic think tank aimed at promoting intercultural dialogue and positive coexistence, through a range of activities including research and publications, training and capacity building, policy briefings and dialogues. The Foundation takes its name from the city of Cordoba. The European metropolis was once a symbol of human excellence and intellectual ingenuity, where cultures, civilisations and ideas thrived. Embodying this spirit, TCF today facilitates the meeting of minds, to advance understanding and respect for one another. Our activities include: Structured consultation and advisory services. Face-to-face interaction with decision-makers and figures of authority. In-house research. Workshops, seminars and debates on pertinent issues. Training and capacity-building. Periodicals and journals. Resourceful website. www.thecordobafoundation.com [email protected] The Cordoba Foundation @CordobaFoundati ISSN 2048-7711 © The Cordoba Foundation 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any way or by any means, without the express permission of The Cordoba Foundation. Date of publication: March 2015. Printed in England. Disclaimer Views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the respective authors/ contributors and do not necessarily represent a corporate view of the publishers. Acknowledgements Special thanks to everyone who contributed material or agreed to be interviewed in this guide. Photo credits William Barylo, Salman Farsi, Rehan Jamil and F. Amin. Cover image: The mural on Cable Street, East End of London depicts the memorable events of 4 October 1936, when a march by Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists was stopped by thousands of local people.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Neo-Nazism in the Usa, United Kingdom and Australia
    TRANSNATIONAL NEO-NAZISM IN THE USA, UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA PAUL JACKSON February 2020 JACKSON | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM About the Program on About the Author Extremism Dr Paul Jackson is a historian of twentieth century and contemporary history, and his main teaching The Program on Extremism at George and research interests focus on understanding the Washington University provides impact of radical and extreme ideologies on wider analysis on issues related to violent and societies. Dr. Jackson’s research currently focuses non-violent extremism. The Program on the dynamics of neo-Nazi, and other, extreme spearheads innovative and thoughtful right ideologies, in Britain and Europe in the post- academic inquiry, producing empirical war period. He is also interested in researching the work that strengthens extremism longer history of radical ideologies and cultures in research as a distinct field of study. The Britain too, especially those linked in some way to Program aims to develop pragmatic the extreme right. policy solutions that resonate with Dr. Jackson’s teaching engages with wider themes policymakers, civic leaders, and the related to the history of fascism, genocide, general public. totalitarian politics and revolutionary ideologies. Dr. Jackson teaches modules on the Holocaust, as well as the history of Communism and fascism. Dr. Jackson regularly writes for the magazine Searchlight on issues related to contemporary extreme right politics. He is a co-editor of the Wiley- Blackwell journal Religion Compass: Modern Ideologies and Faith. Dr. Jackson is also the Editor of the Bloomsbury book series A Modern History of Politics and Violence. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author, and not necessarily those of the Program on Extremism or the George Washington University.
    [Show full text]