Kuruman Wind Energy Facility Phase 2 Near Kuruman, Kuruman District, Northern Cape

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kuruman Wind Energy Facility Phase 2 Near Kuruman, Kuruman District, Northern Cape 1 Palaeontological heritage: input for combined desktop and field-based EIA Assessment KURUMAN WIND ENERGY FACILITY PHASE 2 NEAR KURUMAN, KURUMAN DISTRICT, NORTHERN CAPE John E. Almond (PhD, Cantab.) Natura Viva cc PO Box 12410 Mill Street CAPE TOWN 8010, RSA July 2018 CONCLUSIONS / EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project area for the Kuruman Wind Energy Facility Phase 2, situated in the hilly Kurumanberge region of the Northern Cape, is largely underlain by sedimentary bedrocks of Precambrian (Late Archaean – Early Proterozoic) age assigned to the Ghaap Group (Transvaal Supergroup). These sediments were laid down in shallow inshore to deep offshore marine settings on the margins of the ancient Kaapvaal Craton some 2.5 to 2.4 Ga (= billion years ago). Carbonate sediments (limestones, dolomites) of the Campbell Rand Subgroup crop out at several points along the eastern edge of the Kurumanberge but outside the Phase 2 project area (Small areas outlined in blue in Fig. 22). They are of high palaeobiological significance because they show several unusual and interesting geological and palaeontological features of early Precambrian platform carbonates, including a range of stromatolites (fossil microbial mounds). These fossiliferous carbonates will not be directly impacted by the proposed Phase 2 WEF development. The great majority of the WEF footprint overlies Proterozoic banded iron formation (BIF) of the Asbestos Hills Subgroup (Kuruman and Daniëlskuil Formations). These interlaminated basinal cherts and iron ores may contain microfossils, but no evidence of body fossils, trace fossils or bio- sedimentary structures such as stromatolites has ever been recorded within these units, so their palaeosensitivity is rated as low. The largely unconsolidated superficial sediments that mantle the Precambrian bedrocks in the WEF project area include widespread cherty surface gravels and scree, gravelly to sandy alluvium and soils (e.g. on the floor of the central valley within the Kurumanberge as well as lining drainage courses) and ferricrete. In addition, carbonate-cemented breccias, calcrete and calc-tufa or flowstone overlie the Campbell Rand outcrop outside the project footprint. These Late Caenozoic sediments are generally of low palaeontological sensitivity and no fossils were recorded within them during the present field study. Given the low overall low palaeosensitivity of the proposed footprint, it is concluded that in terms of palaeontological heritage resources the impact significance of the Kuruman WEF Phase 2 is low (negative), both before and after mitigation. This assessment applies to the construction phase and to all relevant components of the WEF infrastructure (e.g. wind turbines, internal and external access roads, underground cabling, on-site substation and construction yards). Significant impacts during the operational and de-commissioning phases are not anticipated. None of the fossil sites identified in the broader Kuruman WEF project area fall inside the Phase 2 development footprint and no specialist palaeontological mitigation is therefore proposed here. Small stromatolite-rich outcrop areas of Campbell Rand carbonates just outside and to the east of the WEF project area John E. Almond (2018) Natura Viva cc, Cape Town 2 (areas outlined in blue in satellite image Figure 22) should be protected from any disturbance or development. Should substantial fossil remains be encountered at surface or exposed during construction, the ECO should safeguard these, preferably in situ. They should then alert the South African Heritage Resources Agency as soon as possible (Contact details: SAHRA, 111 Harrington Street, Cape Town. PO Box 4637, Cape Town 8000, South Africa. Phone : +27 (0)21 462 4502. Fax: +27 (0)21 462 4509. Web: www.sahra.org.za). This is to ensure that appropriate action (i.e. recording, sampling or collection of fossils, recording of relevant geological data) can be taken by a professional palaeontologist at the proponent’s expense. A procedure for Chance Fossil Finds is tabulated in Appendix 2. These recommendations must be incorporated in the Environmental Management Programme for the WEF project. In the context of other alternative energy developments in the broader region, cumulative impacts posed by the Kuruman WEFs (Phase 1 and Phase 2), which are almost entirely underlain by the largely unfossiliferous Asbestos Hills Subgroup BIFs, are of low impact significance. There are no fatal flaws or objections on palaeontological grounds to authorisation of the WEF project, provided that the recommended mitigation measures – including the Chance Fossil Finds procedure – are fully implemented during the construction phase of the development. 1. GEOLOGICAL CONTEXT The project area for the Kuruman WEF is situated in the Kurumanberge Range which lies on the western edge of the Ghaap Plateau and forms part of the semi-arid Southern Kalahari Physiographic Region of the Northern Cape (Partridge et al. 2010). The Kurumanberge comprise a NNW-SSE trending series of low, flat-crested hills which range in elevation from c. 1600-1770 m amsl. (Fig. 1).These are erosional relicts of an elongate, low, dome-shaped upland area that has become highly dissected by numerous small water courses draining towards the Ghaap Plateau and Kuruman River in the northeast and to the west into the Lohatla Plains of the southern Kalahari. The geology of the Kuruman region is shown on the 1: 250 000 sheet map 2722 Kuruman (Council for Geoscience, Pretoria), for which a full explanation has yet to be published (Fig. 2); this map is now outdated in several respects. Excellent simplified geological maps and sections of the region are provided in the Kalahari Manganese Field volume by Cairncross & Beukes (2013) (Figs. 3 & 4). The silicicastic and carbonate bedrocks here are assigned to the Precambrian (Late Archaean to Proterozoic) Transvaal Supergroup (Griqualand West Basin) on the western margins of the ancient Kaapvaal Craton (McCarthy & Rubidge 2005, Eriksson et al. 2006) (Fig. 5). They lie within the Ghaap Plateau Subbasin of the Transvaal succession, situated to the NE of the Griquatown Fault Zone. The Transvaal Supergroup bedrocks here have been folded into a major NNW-SSE trending mega-syncline, known as the Dimoten Syncline, and are cut by several broadly N-S trending faults. Within the broader Kuruman WEF project area the bedrocks of the Ghaap Group – comprising shallow water carbonates of the Campbell Rand Subgroup overlain by deeper water banded iron formation (BIF) of the Asbestos Hills Subgroup - lie on the eastern flank of the syncline, dipping gently and younging towards the west. The youngest bedrocks in the Dimoten Syncline, assigned to the Proterozoic Postmasberg Group, are glacial sediments of the Makganyene Formation and the overlying Ongeluk Formation lavas. These younger rocks, unconformably overlying the John E. Almond (2018) Natura Viva cc, Cape Town 3 Ghaap Group, crop out in the core of the Dimoten Syncline to the west of the Kurumanberge Range and are not mapped within the WEF project area (although they may in fact occur here as well due to faulting). Throughout the study area a large portion of the Precambrian outcrop area is mantled by various, mostly unconsolidated superficial deposits of Late Caenozoic age, notably by BIF colluvial gravels on hillslopes and hillcrests as well as alluvial sediments along stream and river valley floors. Figure 1: Google Earth© satellite image of the highly-dissected Kurumanberge region c. 10 km to the southwest of Kuruman, Northern Cape, showing the land parcels making up the project area of the proposed Kuruman Phase 2 Wind Energy Facility (yellow polygons). Scale bar = 5 km. N towards the top of the image. John E. Almond (2018) Natura Viva cc, Cape Town 4 Figure 2: Extract from 1: 250 000 geology sheet 2722 Kuruman (Council for Geoscience, Pretoria) showing in purple the provisional footprint of both phases of the proposed Kuruman Wind Energy Facility as well as alternative route options for the proposed 132 kV overhead powerline connection to the Eskom grid – either eastwards to Segame Substation near Kuruman (c. 10 km) or westwards to Ferrum Substation near Kathu (c. 50 km) (Image prepared by CTS Heritage). The red rectangle encloses the Kuruman Phase 2 Wind Energy project area. N.B. This geological map needs altering for each EIA report to show (1) outline of WEF Phase 1 / 2 project area, (2) revised footprint of Phase 1 / 2, (3) scale and N arrow. John E. Almond (2018) Natura Viva cc, Cape Town 5 Figure 3: Schematic geological map of the Griqualand West region of the Northern Cape showing the approximate position of the project area for the Kuruman Wind Energy Facility and associated grid connection (red rectangle) (From Cairncross & Beukes 2012). This overlies the NNW-SSE Dimoten mega-syncline with bedrocks of the Campbell Rand and Asbestos Hills Subgroups on the flanks and younger rocks of the Postmasburg Group (Ongeluk and Makganyene Formations) in the core. John E. Almond (2018) Natura Viva cc, Cape Town 6 Figure 4: Stratigraphy of the Transvaal Supergroup showing the bedrock units of the Ghaap Group and unconformably overlying Postmasburg Group within the Griqualand West Basin that are represented in the Kuruman WEF project area and Lohatlha plains to the west (black rectangle). Campbell Rand Subgroup The Campbell Rand Subgroup (Vgd in Fig. 2) of the Ghaap Group - previously included within the Ghaapplato Formation in older literature - is a very thick (1.6 - 2.5 km) carbonate platform succession of dolostones, dolomitic limestones and cherts with minor tuffs and siliciclastic rocks. It was deposited on the shallow submerged shelf of the Kaapvaal Craton roughly 2.6 to 2.5 Ga (billion years ago) (See the readable general account by McCarthy & Rubidge, pp. 112-118 and Fig. 4.10 therein). A range of shallow water facies, often forming depositional cycles reflecting sea level changes, are represented here, including stromatolitic limestones and dolostones, oolites, oncolites, laminated calcilutites, cherts and marls, with subordinate siliclastics (shales, siltstones) and minor tuffs (Beukes 1980, Beukes 1986, Sumner 2002, Eriksson et al.
Recommended publications
  • Paper Number: 3492 MARKET DEVELOPMENT and SUPPORT of MINERAL BASED SMME’S in the NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
    Paper Number: 3492 MARKET DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT OF MINERAL BASED SMME’s IN THE NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Modiga, A., Rasmeni S.K., Mokubedi, I., and Auchterlonie, A Small Scale Mining and Beneficiation Division, Mintek, Randburg South Africa [email protected] For some time the South African government has been advocating the advancement of Small, Medium and Micro-sized Enterprises (SMMEs) through the prioritisation of entrepreneurship as the catalyst to achieving economic growth, development and self-sustainability. Mintek has undertaken a project that is aimed at supporting the SMMEs in the mining industry by researching the semi-precious gemstone mineral potential in the Northern Cape Province. The project provided training on safe mining methods and the beneficiation of the mineral resources through value-addition programmes (stone cutting and polishing as well as jewellery manufacturing) by the establishment of centres in the province. This will encourage a level of poverty alleviation in this region through the creation of employment in the small scale minerals, mining and manufacturing sector. Preliminary field investigations show that certain communities, especially in the Prieska and surrounding area, mine various types of semi-precious gemstone. Of notable importance are tiger’s eye deposits in the Prieska area, Griekwastad and Niekerkshoop. Mining is mainly seasonal and these miners lack appropriate tools and machinery to conduct mining efficiently. Most of the communities are characterised by low literacy levels and the miners have no access to financing or credit from formal financial institutions for them to finance their operational requirements. The lack of a formal or established market for the semi-precious stones such as tiger’s eye results in the exploitation of miners.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore the Northern Cape Province
    Cultural Guiding - Explore The Northern Cape Province When Schalk van Niekerk traded all his possessions for an 83.5 carat stone owned by the Griqua Shepard, Zwartboy, Sir Richard Southey, Colonial Secretary of the Cape, declared with some justification: “This is the rock on which the future of South Africa will be built.” For us, The Star of South Africa, as the gem became known, shines not in the East, but in the Northern Cape. (Tourism Blueprint, 2006) 2 – WildlifeCampus Cultural Guiding Course – Northern Cape Module # 1 - Province Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Province Overview Module # 2 - Cultural Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Cultural Overview Module # 3 - Historical Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Historical Overview Module # 4 - Wildlife and Nature Conservation Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Wildlife and Nature Conservation Overview Module # 5 - Namaqualand Component # 1 - Namaqualand Component # 2 - The Hantam Karoo Component # 3 - Towns along the N14 Component # 4 - Richtersveld Component # 5 - The West Coast Module # 5 - Karoo Region Component # 1 - Introduction to the Karoo and N12 towns Component # 2 - Towns along the N1, N9 and N10 Component # 3 - Other Karoo towns Module # 6 - Diamond Region Component # 1 - Kimberley Component # 2 - Battlefields and towns along the N12 Module # 7 - The Green Kalahari Component # 1 – The Green Kalahari Module # 8 - The Kalahari Component # 1 - Kuruman and towns along the N14 South and R31 Northern Cape Province Overview This course material is the copyrighted intellectual property of WildlifeCampus. It may not be copied, distributed or reproduced in any format whatsoever without the express written permission of WildlifeCampus. 3 – WildlifeCampus Cultural Guiding Course – Northern Cape Module 1 - Component 1 Northern Cape Province Overview Introduction Diamonds certainly put the Northern Cape on the map, but it has far more to offer than these shiny stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Ncta Map 2017 V4 Print 11.49 MB
    here. Encounter martial eagles puffed out against the morning excellent opportunities for river rafting and the best wilderness fly- Stargazers, history boffins and soul searchers will all feel welcome Experience the Northern Cape Northern Cape Routes chill, wildebeest snorting plumes of vapour into the freezing air fishing in South Africa, while the entire Richtersveld is a mountain here. Go succulent sleuthing with a botanical guide or hike the TOURISM INFORMATION We invite you to explore one of our spectacular route and the deep bass rumble of a black- maned lion proclaiming its biker’s dream. Soak up the culture and spend a day following Springbok Klipkoppie for a dose of Anglo-Boer War history, explore NORTHERN CAPE TOURISM AUTHORITY Discover the heart of the Northern Cape as you travel experiences or even enjoy a combination of two or more as territory from a high dune. the footsteps of a traditional goat herder and learn about life of the countless shipwrecks along the coast line or visit Namastat, 15 Villiers Street, Kimberley CBD, 8301 Tel: +27 (0) 53 833 1434 · Fax +27 (0) 53 831 2937 along its many routes and discover a myriad of uniquely di- you travel through our province. the nomads. In the villages, the locals will entertain guests with a traditional matjies-hut village. Just get out there and clear your Traveling in the Kalahari is perfect for the adventure-loving family Email: [email protected] verse experiences. Each of the five regions offers interest- storytelling and traditional Nama step dancing upon request. mind! and adrenaline seekers.
    [Show full text]
  • Census of Agriculture Provincial Statistics 2002- Northern Cape Financial and Production Statistics
    Census of Agriculture Provincial Statistics 2002- Northern Cape Financial and production statistics Report No. 11-02-04 (2002) Department of Agriculture Statistics South Africa i Published by Statistics South Africa, Private Bag X44, Pretoria 0001 © Statistics South Africa, 2006 Users may apply or process this data, provided Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) is acknowledged as the original source of the data; that it is specified that the application and/or analysis is the result of the user's independent processing of the data; and that neither the basic data nor any reprocessed version or application thereof may be sold or offered for sale in any form whatsoever without prior permission from Stats SA. Stats SA Library Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) Data Census of agriculture Provincial Statistics 2002: Northern Cape / Statistics South Africa, Pretoria, Statistics South Africa, 2005 XXX p. (Report No. 11-02-01 (2002)). ISBN 0-621-36446-0 1. Agriculture I. Statistics South Africa (LCSH 16) A complete set of Stats SA publications is available at Stats SA Library and the following libraries: National Library of South Africa, Pretoria Division Eastern Cape Library Services, King William’s Town National Library of South Africa, Cape Town Division Central Regional Library, Polokwane Library of Parliament, Cape Town Central Reference Library, Nelspruit Bloemfontein Public Library Central Reference Collection, Kimberley Natal Society Library, Pietermaritzburg Central Reference Library, Mmabatho Johannesburg Public Library This report is available
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pixley Ka Seme District Profile
    2 PROFILE: CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METRO PROFILE: CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METRO 3 CONTENT 1. Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................................4 2. Pixley ka Seme District Overview ....................................................................................................................5 2.1 Historical Perspective ............................................................................................................................5 2.2 Location .................................................................................................................................................5 2.3 Spatial Status ........................................................................................................................................7 3. Social Development .......................................................................................................................................11 3.1 Key Social Demographics ...................................................................................................................11 3.1.1 Population .............................................................................................................................................11 3.1.2 Gender, Age and Race ........................................................................................................................11 3.1.3 Households..........................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Risk of Mesothelioma from Exposure to Crocidolite Asbestos: a 1995 Update of a South African Mortality Study
    Occup Environ Med 2000;57:563–567 563 Occup Environ Med: first published as 10.1136/oem.57.8.563 on 1 August 2000. Downloaded from Risk of mesothelioma from exposure to crocidolite asbestos: a 1995 update of a South African mortality study Danuta Kielkowski, Gillian Nelson, David Rees Abstract Prieska is a small, remote town in South Africa, Objective—To find the risk of developing close to a crocidolite asbestos mining area that mesothelioma in a cohort born in 1916–36 was productive from 1893 to the late 1960s. in Prieska, Northern Cape Province, Twenty four crocidolite rich deposits had been South Africa. identified in the Prieska magisterial district by Methods—A birth cohort mortality study 1930.1 These were mined at various times from was carried out in a small town in the 1919–43 by the Cape Asbestos Company and Northern Cape Province, South Africa, from 1929 by smaller companies. A crushing with a history of crocidolite asbestos min- mill was built in Prieska town in 1930, and ing and milling. The cohort comprised all residents were exposed to asbestos fibre white births registered in the magisterial emissions from the mill which was close to both district of Prieska from 1916 to 1936, the residential and business areas,2 until at least inclusive (2390). Causes of death due to 1964. Local residents, however, remember the mesothelioma and other cancers as re- mill working in the late 1970s. Other sources of corded on medical certificates of cause of exposure were the asbestos dumps (on which death were investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Overview for Lower Orange Water Management Area
    ISP: LOWER ORANGE WMA Appendix B Groundwater Overview for Lower Orange Water Management Area 03 - APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER.DOC JULY 2004 B1 DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNAL STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES GROUNDWATER OVERVIEW FOR LOWER ORANGE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AREA Prepared by: JA Pretorius and I Dennis Darcy Groundwater Scientists and Consultants Bloemfontein Prepared for: Directorate Water Resource Planning DWAF Private Bag X313 Pretoria SEPTEMBER 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 OVERARCHING ISSUES ........................................................................................................ 3 1.1 AVAILABILITY OF GROUNDWATER INFORMATION IN THE CATCHMENT AREA............................... 3 1.2 OVERVIEW OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES AND USE THROUGHOUT THE CATCHMENT AREA .... 3 1.2.1 Industrial and mining.................................................................................................. 3 1.2.2 Agriculture.................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.3 Domestic .................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 GROUNDWATER QUALITY IN THE CATCHMENT AREA ............................................................... 4 1.3.1 Natural ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Point and diffusive pollution ....................................................................................... 7 1.4 GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Demography
    Provincial Profile 2004 Northern Cape Pali Lehohla Statistician-General Report No. 00-91-03 (2004) Statistic South Africa Published by Statistics South Africa, Private Bag X44, Pretoria 0001 © Statistics South Africa, 2006 Users may apply or process this data, provided Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) is acknowledged as the original source of the data; that it is specified that the application and/or analysis is the result of the user's independent processing of the data; and that neither the basic data nor any reprocessed version or application thereof may be sold or offered for sale in any form whatsoever without prior permission from Stats SA. Stats SA Library Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) Data Provincial Profile 2004: Northern Cape/Statistics South Africa. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa, 2006 104p. [Report No. 00-91-03 (2004)] ISBN 0-621-36362-6 1. Demography – Northern Cape (South Africa) 2. Vital Statistics – Northern Cape (South Africa) 3. Households – Northern Cape (South Africa) 4. Education – Statistics – Northern Cape (South Africa) 5. Public Health – Northern Cape (South Africa) 6. Labour Markets – Northern Cape (South Africa) 7. Migration, Internal – Northern Cape (South Africa) 8. Emigration and Immigration – Northern Cape (South Africa) 9. Crime Statistics – Northern Cape (South Africa) 10. Gross State Product – Northern Cape (South Africa) 11. Prices Indexes 12. Legislative Bodies – Northern Cape (South Africa) I. Statistics South Africa II. Series (LCSH 16) A complete set of Stats SA publications is available
    [Show full text]
  • Heard On: Delivered On: the STATE NEVILLE VAN STADE
    Reportable: YES I NO I Circulate to Judges: YES I NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES I NO I Ctrculate to Reglonal Mag istrates: YES/ NO · IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY Case No: KIS 21 /2016 Heard on: 05/09/2016; 07-09/09//2016 21-24/11/2016 Delivered on: 07/12/2016 In the matter between: THE STATE v NEVILLE VAN STADEN ACCUSED JUDGMENT MAMOSEBOJ [ 1] The accused, Mr Neville Van Staden, is indicted on one charge of murder read with s 51 of the General Law Amendment Act, 105 of 1997, as amended, a second count of assault common, a third of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm and a fourth of assault common. The 12 Justice Centre appointed Adv Maphalla on judicare to represent him. He pleaded not guilty on all four counts and did not tender any plea explanation or make any admissions. The State is represented by Adv Kgatwe from the office of the Director Public Prosecutions (DPP). [2] The post mortem report was handed in by agreement and marked Exh "A". The accompanying photos and the affidavit in terms of s 212 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 51 of 1977 (the CPA) by W/O Maureen Mokgokolo marked Exh "B"; the photos from the crime scene and the affidavit in terms of s 212 of the CPA by W/O Phathutshedzo Tshibalo marked Exh "C" were all formally admitted in evidence. The accused further formally admitted the identity of the deceased, Ms Nancy Jas. THE STATE CASE [3] Ms Lya Olyn is a registered nurse with a diploma in General Nursing.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of a CSP and CPV/ PV Plant In, De Aar, Northern Cape Province of South Africa
    MAINSTREAM RENEWABLE POWER Construction of a CSP and CPV/ PV Plant in, De Aar, Northern Cape Province of South Africa Draft Environmental Impact Report - Ref #12/12/20/2025 Issue Date: 13 May 2011 Revision No.: 1 Project No.: 10273 Date: 13 May 2011 Construction of a CSP and CPV/ PV Plant in, De Aar, Northern Cape Document Title: Province of South Africa: Draft Environmental Impact Report Author: Lucy Chimoyi Revision Number: 1 Checked by: Liesl Koch Approved: Liesl Koch Signature: For: SiVEST Environmental Division COPYRIGHT IS VESTED IN SiVEST IN TERMS OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT (ACT 98 OF 1978) AND NO USE OR REPRODUCTION OR DUPLICATION THEREOF MAY OCCUR WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE AUTHOR The Independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner in terms of Regulation 17(1): We, SiVEST Environmental, declare that we – . act as the Independent Environmental Assessment Practitioners in this application for the proposed construction a Concentrated Solar Plant (CSP) and Concentrated Photovoltaic (CPV/ PV) Plant in, De Aar, Northern Cape Province of South Africa. do not have and will not have any financial interest in the undertaking of the activity, other than remuneration for work performed in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2006; . have and will not have any vested interest in the proposed activity proceeding; . have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity; and . will provide the competent authority with access to all information at our disposal regarding the application, whether such information is favourable to the applicant or not. MAINSTREAM RENEWABLE POWER prepared by: SiVEST Environmental Draft Environmental Impact Report Revision No.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Number: 5211
    Paper Number: 5211 The Orange and Riet River alluvial diamond deposits in the vicinity of Douglas, Northern Cape Province: geology, evaluation, and exploitation of unique South African large diamond producing deposits De Meillon, L.1, and Bristow, J.W.2 1Paleostone Mineral Consultants, Kimberley, RSA: [email protected] 2Bristow, J.W., Global Diamond Network, P O Box 11946, Hatfield, RSA 0028 ___________________________________________________________________________ Middle Orange River (MOR) alluvial deposits between Hopetown – Douglas and Douglas – Prieska, and the Riet River downstream of Ritchie, represent three unique sinks or repositories of high quality gem diamonds. These exceptional populations of gem diamonds include regular stones larger than 100 carats, and less common stones larger than 200 carats. The most common large stones are white (D colour) Type-II, and yellow diamonds; rare smaller coloured stones such as pinks also occur. The MOR alluvial diamond deposits comprise extensive remnant terraces (Miocene – Present) which are preserved at successive elevations (120 m – 0m) above the modern Orange River on the left and right banks.. The Riet River system is younger with the highest terrace at 25 m above current river. These deposits are products of massive paleoriver systems draining the diamondiferous kimberlites in the southern African hinterland during periods of strong weathering and erosion caused by uplift and excessively wet climatic periods. The remnant terraces generally comprise coarse basal gravels overlain by upward fining interbedded gravel layers and sand lenses. Sedimentological features are consistent with a system of braided channels depositing coarse gravel bars during peak flow and finer sediments during reduced flow in an incised meander system.
    [Show full text]