KETTLE CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Clinton, Potter, and Tioga Counties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

KETTLE CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Clinton, Potter, and Tioga Counties FINAL KETTLE CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Clinton, Potter, and Tioga Counties Prepared for: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection April 1, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 LOCATION .................................................................................................................................... 1 SEGMENTS ADDRESSED IN THIS TMDL ............................................................................... 2 CLEAN WATER ACT REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................... 3 SECTION 303(D) LISTING PROCESS ........................................................................................ 4 BASIC STEPS FOR DETERMINING A TMDL .......................................................................... 5 WATERSHED BACKGROUND................................................................................................... 5 AMD METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 9 ACCOUNTING FOR UPSTREAM REDUCTIONS IN AMD TMDLS..................................... 11 METHOD TO QUANTIFY TREATMENT POND POLLUTANT LOAD................................ 12 TMDL ENDPOINTS.................................................................................................................... 15 TMDL ELEMENTS (WLA, LA, MOS)....................................................................................... 15 TMDL ALLOCATIONS SUMMARY......................................................................................... 16 RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................. 17 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ......................................................................................................... 20 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 21 TABLES Table 1. Kettle Creek Segments Addressed................................................................................ 1 Table 2. Mining Permits in the Kettle Creek Watershed ............................................................ 7 Table 3. Applicable Water Quality Criteria.............................................................................. 15 Table 4. Correlation Between Metals and Flow for Selected Points ........................................ 16 Table 5. Summary Table–Kettle Creek Watershed .................................................................. 17 Table 6. Waste load Allocation of Permitted Operations ......................................................... 17 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A. Kettle Creek Watershed Map..............................................................................23 Attachment B. Excerpts Justifying Changes Between the 1996, 1998, 2002, and 2004 Section 303(d) Lists .........................................................................................................25 Attachment C. Method for Addressing 303(d) Listings for pH………………………………..28 Attachment D. TMDLs By Segment...........................................................................................32 Attachment E. Water Quality Data Used in TMDL Calculations...............................................40 Attachment F. Comment and Response......................................................................................46 i FINAL TMDL1 Kettle Creek Watershed Clinton, Potter, and Tioga Counties, Pennsylvania INTRODUCTION This Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) calculation has been prepared for segments in the Kettle Creek Watershed (Attachment A). It was done to address the impairments noted on the 1996, 1998, 2002, and 2004 Pennsylvania Section 303(d) lists required under the Clean Water Act. The TMDL covers one segment on these lists (Table 1). High levels of metals, and in some areas depressed pH, caused these impairments. All impairments are a result of acid drainage from abandoned coal mines. The TMDL addresses the three primary metals (iron, manganese, and aluminum) associated with abandoned mine drainage (AMD) and pH. Table 1. Kettle Creek Segments Addressed State Water Plan (SWP) Subbasin: 09-B West Branch Susquehanna River EPA DEP Stream Designated 305(b) Year Miles Segment ID Stream Name Data Source Source Code Use Cause Code Not Placed on 1996 3.0 23661 Kettle Creek TSF 305(b) Report RE Metals GIS Surface Water Not Placed on 1998 3.0 23661 Kettle Creek TSF Monitoring AMD Metals GIS Program Surface Water 990514-1215- Metals, 2002 1.9 23661 Kettle Creek TSF Monitoring AMD TAS pH Program Statewide 990514-1215- Surface Water Metals, 2004 1.9 23661 Kettle Creek TSF AMD TAS Monitoring pH Program Attachment B includes a justification of differences between the 1996, 1998, 2002, and 2004 Section 303(d) Lists TSF = Trout Stocked Fishery RE = Resource Extraction AMD = Abandoned Mine Drainage LOCATION The Kettle Creek Watershed covers approximately 244 square miles in Potter, Tioga, and Clinton Counties in north central Pennsylvania. The headwaters of Kettle Creek flow through the Susquehannock State Forest in Potter County. The middle portion of the watershed lies in the F. H. Dutlinger Natural Area and the proposed Hammersley Wild Area. Ole Bull State Park is also located in the middle Kettle Creek Watershed. Kettle Creek State Park surrounds the Alvin R. Bush Dam on the mainstem of Kettle Creek approximately 8.5 miles from the confluence of Kettle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River. The mainstem of Lower 1 Pennsylvania’s 1996, 1998, 2002, and 2004 Section 303(d) lists were approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The 1996 Section 303(d) list provides the basis for measuring progress under the 1996 lawsuit settlement of American Littoral Society and Public Interest Group of Pennsylvania v. EPA. 1 Kettle Creek, from the Alvin R. Bush Dam to the mouth of the stream, is the focus of this TMDL report. All the AMD additions to Kettle Creek are in this section of the stream. The study area can be located on the U. S. Geological Service (USGS) 7.5 minute quadrangles of Keating and Renovo West, Pennsylvania. A large portion of the Lower Kettle Creek Watershed lies in the Sproul State Forest; private parcels account for the remaining land ownership. In the study area, Kettle Creek flows southeast from the Alvin R. Bush Dam in Kettle Creek State Park to its confluence with the West Branch Susquehanna River in the village of Westport, Clinton County, Pennsylvania. The only major named tributary to Kettle Creek is Twomile Run that enters Kettle Creek from the east. Several small tributaries enter Kettle Creek from the west including Hicks Hollow, Slide Hollow, Short Bend Run, Duck Hollow, and Butler Hollow. The watershed is sparsely populated; hunting cabins are the main dwellings found within the watershed. The village of Westport lies on State Highway 120, to the north of the confluence of Kettle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River. Kettle Creek can be accessed from State Highway 120 at its mouth and from State Route 4001 along its entire length in the study area. Several township roads provide access to other portions of the watershed including T307, T468, Cattaraugus Road, Boyer Road, Crowley Road, and Sugar Camp Road. The upper portions of the Kettle Creek Watershed can be accessed from State Highway 144 and various township and state forest roads. SEGMENTS ADDRESSED IN THIS TMDL The Lower Kettle Creek Watershed is affected by pollution from AMD. This pollution has caused high levels of metals and low pH in the mainstem of Kettle Creek, the Twomile Run Watershed, Butler Hollow, Duck Hollow, Short Bend Run, and Slide Hollow. The sources of the AMD are deep mine discharges and seeps from areas disturbed by surface mining. Most of the discharges originate from long abandoned deep mines on the Lower Kittanning coal seams or surface mining of the Upper and Lower Kittanning coal seams that were reclaimed to pre-act standards. All of the discharges are considered to be nonpoint sources of pollution because they are from abandoned Pre-Act mining operations or from coal companies that have settled their bond forfeitures with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). There are no bond forfeitures in the Kettle Creek Watershed. A TMDL report for the Twomile Run Watershed was completed in February 2001 and approved by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. The loading from the mouth of Twomile Run will be incorporated into the TMDL for the Kettle Creek Watershed. The Twomile Run Watershed will not be discussed in this report; please reference the Twomile Run TMDL document for further details. There is no active mining in the Kettle Creek Watershed; all active mining ceased in the watershed in 1977. A WLA for a future mining operation was calculated and incorporated into the allocations at KC1 at the request of the PADEP Moshannon District Mining Office. It is possible that there will be mining in the Lower Kettle Creek Watershed in the future based on available coal reserves, mining operator interests, the possibility of reclamation by remining, and 2 other factors. A WLA that is representative of one future surface mining operation has been included to accommodate this possibility. Any pre-existing discharges listed on permitted sites are treated as nonpoint sources for the purposes
Recommended publications
  • An Economic Benefit Analysis for Abandoned Mine Drainage Remediation in the West Branch Susquehanna River Watershed, Pennsylvania
    AN ECONOMIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR ABANDONED MINE DRAINAGE REMEDIATION IN THE WEST BRANCH SUSQUEHANNA RIVER WATERSHED, PENNSYLVANIA July 3, 2008 Submitted to: Trout Unlimited West Branch Susquehanna Restoration Initiative P.O. Box 27 Mill Hall, PA 17751 Submitted by: Downstream Strategies, LLC www.downstreamstrategies.com 219 Wall Street Morgantown, WV 26505 Evan Hansen, Alan Collins, Julie Svetlik, Sarah McClurg, Alyse Shrecongost, Rob Stenger, Mariya Schilz, and Fritz Boettner TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................1 2. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................6 2.1 THE WEST BRANCH SUSQUEHANNA RIVER WATERSHED ............................................................................6 2.2 ABANDONED MINE DRAINAGE POLLUTION ..................................................................................................7 3. JOBS AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ...........................................................................................................13 3.1 METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................................................................14 3.2 RESULTS....................................................................................................................................................16 3.3 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • West Branch Subbasin AMD Remediation Strategy
    Publication 254 West Branch Susquehanna Subbasin May 2008 AMD Remediation Strategy: West Branch Susquehanna Background, Data Assessment River Task Force and Method Development Despite the enormous legacy ■ INTRODUCTION Pristine setting along the West Branch Susquehanna River. of pollution from abandoned mine The West Branch Susquehanna drainage (AMD) in the West Subbasin, draining a 6,978-square-mile Branch Susquehanna Subbasin, area in northcentral Pennsylvania, is the there has been mounting support largest of the six major subbasins in and enthusiasm for a fully restored the Susquehanna River Basin (Figure 1). watershed. Under the leadership The West Branch Susquehanna of Governor Edward G. Rendell Subbasin is one of extreme contrasts. While and with support from it has some of the Commonwealth’s Trout Unlimited, Pennsylvania most pristine and treasured waterways, Department of Environmental including 1,249 miles of Exceptional Protection Secretary Kathleen Value streams and scenic forestlands and mountains, it also unfortunately M. Smith McGinty established the West bears the legacy of past Branch Susquehanna River Task unregulated mining. With Abandoned mine lands in Clearfield County. Force (Task Force) in 2004. 1,205 miles of waterways The goal of the Task Force is to impaired by AMD, it is the assist and advise the department and most AMD-impaired region its partners as they work toward of the entire Susquehanna the long-term goal to remediate the River Basin (Figure 2). At its most degraded region’s AMD. sites, the West Branch The Task Force is comprised Susquehanna River contains of state, federal, and regional acidity concentrations of agencies, Trout Unlimited, and nearly 200 milligrams per other conservation and watershed liter (mg/l), and iron and aluminum concentrations of organizations (members are identified A.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • West Branch Subbasin Survey 2015
    West Branch Susquehanna River Subbasin Year 1 Survey, April through August 2015 Pub. No.308 September 2016 Ellyn J. Campbell Supervisor, Monitoring and Assessment Susquehanna River Basin Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS USED IN THE 2015 SUBBASIN SURVEY ............................................................. 5 Long-term Sites ........................................................................................................................... 6 Probabilistic Sites........................................................................................................................ 6 Water Chemistry and Discharge ................................................................................................. 8 Macroinvertebrates ................................................................................................................... 10 Physical Habitat ........................................................................................................................ 11 RESULTS and DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................... 11 CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................... 25 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 27 FIGURES
    [Show full text]
  • PA Wilds Fishing Guide
    Allegheny National Forest Get Your Fishing License & Go WILDS! Ranger Stations Pennsylvania offers a variety of tourist and resident license options – from a one-day Bradford: 814-362-4613 PA Game Commission permit to a lifetime license – so there’s one that’s just right for you. And getting your Marienville: 814-927-6628 license is quick and easy. Licenses can be purchased and printed from the convenience of : 814-723-5150 Serving the following PA Wilds Counties: your own home. Simply visit and click on the “Get Your Fishing Warren www.fishandboat.com Cameron, Clearfield, License” link on the home page or purchase your license at one of 1200 issuing agents Clinton, Elk, Lycoming, statewide. Anglers 16 years of age and older must possess a valid fishing license to fish fs.usda.gov/allegheny McKean, Potter, Tioga in Pennsylvania.CAMERON, CLARION, ELK, FOREST & JEFFERSON MCKEAN COUNTY 1566 South Route 44 Highway COUNTIES Allegheny National Forest PA Fish & Boat Commission P.O. Box 5038 PickNorthwest the licensePennsylvania’s that best fits you.Visitors Bureau Jersey Shore, PA 17740 Great Outdoors 80 East Corydon Street, Serving the following PA Wilds counties: (570) 398-4744 Visitors Bureau Suite 114 TYPE OF LICENSE Bradford,AGE PA 16701 COST Cameron, Clearfield, 2801 Maplevale Road Serving the following PA Wilds Counties: ResidentBrookville, PA 15825 800-473-937016-64 $22.00 Clinton, Elk, Jefferson, Clarion, Forest, Senior 814-849-5197Resident (Annual) www.visitANF.com65 & up $11.00 FishingLycoming, in the McKean, Pennsylvania Wilds .....................................1 www.visitpago.com Potter, Tioga Jefferson, Warren Senior Resident (Lifetime) 65 & up $51.00 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania
    Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania In partnership with the following major contributors and Technical Committee Organizations represented: The United States Geological Survey, PA Water Science Center Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., LLC (posthumously) Susquehanna River Basin Commission Dauphin County Conservation District Ian C. Palmer-Researcher PA Department of Environmental Protection-- Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation, Bureau of Deep Mine Safety, & Pottsville District Mining Office MINE WATER RESOURCES OF THE ANTHRACITE REGION OF PENNSYLVANIA Foreword: Dedication to Roger J. Hornberger, P.G. (Robert E. Hughes) PART 1. Mine Water of the Anthracite Region Chapter 1. Introduction to the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, and Roger J. Hornberger, P.G.) Chapter 2. Geology of the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., Caroline M. Loop, Keith B.C. Brady, P.G., Nathan A. Houtz, P.G.) Chapter 3. Colliery Development in the Anthracite Coal Fields (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., David L. Williams, Daniel J. Koury and Keith A. Laslow, P.G.) Chapter 4. A Geospatial Approach to Mapping the Anthracite Coal Fields (Michael A. Hewitt, Robert E. Hughes & Maynard L. (Mike) Dunn, Jr., P.G.) Chapter 5. The Development and Demise of Major Mining in the Northern Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., and Michael A. Hewitt) Chapter 6. The Development of Mining and Mine Drainage Tunnels of the Eastern Middle Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, Jerrald Hollowell. P.G., Keith A. Laslow, P.G., and Roger J.
    [Show full text]
  • Class a Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class
    Class A Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class A Waters: Streams that support a population of naturally produced trout of sufficient size and abundance to support a long-term and rewarding sport fishery. Management: Natural reproduction, wild populations with no stocking. Definition of Ownership: Percent Public Ownership: the percent of stream section that is within publicly owned land is listed in this column, publicly owned land consists of state game lands, state forest, state parks, etc. Important Note to Anglers: Many waters in Pennsylvania are on private property, the listing or mapping of waters by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission DOES NOT guarantee public access. Always obtain permission to fish on private property. Percent Lower Limit Lower Limit Length Public County Water Section Fishery Section Limits Latitude Longitude (miles) Ownership Adams Carbaugh Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Carbaugh Reservoir pool 39.871810 -77.451700 1.50 100 Adams East Branch Antietam Creek 1 Brook Headwaters to Waynesboro Reservoir inlet 39.818420 -77.456300 2.40 100 Adams-Franklin Hayes Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 31 Bedford Bear Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 40.207730 -78.317500 0.77 100 Bedford Ott Town Run 1 Brown Headwaters to Mouth 39.978611 -78.440833 0.60 0 Bedford Potter Creek 2 Brown T 609 bridge to Mouth 40.189160 -78.375700 3.30 0 Bedford Three Springs Run 2 Brown Rt 869 bridge at New Enterprise to Mouth 40.171320 -78.377000 2.00 0 Bedford UNT To Shobers Run (RM 6.50) 2 Brown
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - November 2018
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - November 2018 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.554253 -80.206802 7.91 Armstrong Birch Run Allegheny River Headwaters dnst to mouth 41.033300 -79.619414 1.10 Armstrong Bullock Run North Fork Pine Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.879723 -79.441391 1.81 Armstrong Cornplanter Run Buffalo Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.754444 -79.671944 1.76 Armstrong Cove Run Sugar Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.987652 -79.634421 2.59 Armstrong Crooked Creek Allegheny River Headwaters to conf Pine Rn 40.722221 -79.102501 8.18 Armstrong Foundry Run Mahoning Creek Lake Headwaters
    [Show full text]
  • SRBC 2011 Anthracite Region Mine Drainage Remediation Strategy
    December 2011 Susquehanna Publication 279 River Basin Anthracite Region Commission Mine Drainage Remediation Strategy About this Report he largest source of Anthracite Coal in light of current funding limitations. Twithin the United States is found However, opportunities exist in the This technical report, Anthracite in the four distinct Anthracite Coal Anthracite Coal Region that could Region Mine Drainage Fields of northeastern Pennsylvania. encourage and assist in the restoration The four fields – Northern, Eastern- of its lands and waters. Remediation Strategy, includes: Middle, Western-Middle, and Southern – lie mostly in the Susquehanna River For example, the numerous underground introduction to the region’s Basin; the remaining portions are in the mine pools of the Anthracite Region hold geology & mining history; Delaware River Basin. The Susquehanna vast quantities of water that could be mining techniques and watershed portion covers nearly 517 utilized by industry or for augmenting square miles (Figure 1). streamflows during times of drought. impacts; In addition, the large flow discharges strategy methodology; The sheer size of these four Anthracite indicative of the Anthracite Region also discussion of data findings; Coal Fields made this portion of hold hydroelectric development potential Pennsylvania one of the most important that can offset energy needs and, at the basin-scale restoration plan; resource extraction regions in the United same time, assist in the treatment of the and States and helped spur the nation’s utilized AMD discharge. recommendations. Industrial Revolution. Anthracite Coal became the premier fuel source of To help address the environmental nineteenth and early twentieth century impacts while promoting the resource America and heated most homes and development potential of the Anthracite businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton County Comprehensive Plan 2014 Adopted April 10, 2014
    Clinton County Comprehensive Plan 2014 Adopted April 10, 2014 A strategic planning guide for Clinton County and municipal officials, the Clinton County Planning Commission, and the Clinton County Planning Department to follow in guiding new development. Clinton County Comprehensive Plan • Adopted April 10, 2014 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This update was performed by Clinton County staff with participation of local and state agencies and the public. It could not have been completed without the help of the following contributors. CLINTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Jeffrey A. Snyder, Chairman Robert B. “Pete” Smeltz, Jr., Vice Chairman Joel Long, Commissioner CLINTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Timothy L. Holladay, Director Katherine M. de Silva, Grants Administrator Gregory T. Smith, Community Planner CLINTON COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT James Watson, Director Daniel Ake CLINTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS Terry Murty, Chairman David Calhoun, Vice Chairman Douglas T. Byerly Richard C. Bowman III Thomas Campbell Melvin Coakley John Dotterer David Glessner Roger Hoy ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTORS Rachelle Abbott, STEP Mary Jane Isenberg, CC Women’s Center Connie Baker, STEP Jonathon Johnson, Center for Rural Pennsylvania Maria Boileau, CC Voter Registration Shawn Lehman, DCNR Bureau of Forestry Mary Ann Bower, CC Conservation District Pete Lopes, CC Tourist Promotion Agency Doug D’Amore, DCNR Bureau of Forestry Richard Morris, private citizen Sue Evans, STEP Jeffrey Rich, CC Housing Authority Mike Flanagan, CC Economic Partnership Trevor Reeder, CC Emergency Services
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D: Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) – Jan 2015
    Appendix D: Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) – Jan 2015 Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - Jan 2015 Lower Lower Length County Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Limit Lat Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Marsh Creek Not Recorded Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.554253 -80.206802 7.91 Armstrong Bullock Run North Fork Pine Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.879723 -79.441391 1.81 Armstrong Cornplanter Run Buffalo Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.754444 -79.671944 1.76 Armstrong Crooked Creek Allegheny River Headwaters to conf Pine Rn 40.722221 -79.102501 8.18 Armstrong Foundry Run Mahoning Creek Lake Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.910416 -79.221046 2.43 Armstrong Glade Run Allegheny River Headwaters dnst to second trib upst from mouth 40.767223 -79.566940 10.51 Armstrong Glade Run Mahoning Creek Lake Headwaters
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Abandoned Coal-Mine Drainage on Streamflow and Water
    Effects of Abandoned Coal-Mine Drainage on Streamflow and Water Quality in the Mahanoy Creek Basin, Schuylkill, Columbia, and Northumberland Counties, Pennsylvania, 2001 by Charles A. Cravotta III In cooperation with the Schuylkill Conservation District and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5291 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to repro- duce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Cravotta, C.A., III, 2005, Effects of abandoned coal-mine drainage on streamflow and water quality in the Mahanoy Creek Basin, Schuylkill, Columbia, and Northumberland Counties, Pennsylvania, 2001: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5291, 60 pages plus appendixes. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data iii Contents Abstract. 1 Introduction . 2 Purpose and Scope . 4 Physiography and Land Use . 4 Geology and Mining History . 4 Water Quality . 5 Water-Quality Protection and Restoration . 6 Methods of Water-Quality Site Selection, Sampling, and Analysis .
    [Show full text]