Freight Corridors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freight Corridors Freight Corridors This technical appendix to the Tampa Bay Regional Goods Movement Study focuses on the regional freight mobility corridors located within the five-county region of Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, Hernando, and Citrus Counties that together comprise District VII of the Florida Department of Transportation. This document provides a list of regionally significant goods movement corridors to help focus improvement efforts on corridors with the most impact on local and regional economies. These corridors include sections of the Strategic Intermodal System highways, the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS), and regional connectors as well as the CSX rail corridors that serve the Tampa Bay Region. Corridor Highlights: • Location and description of the highway or rail facility and adjacent land use. • Scheduled and planned improvements • Train activity on rail corridors • Freight related problems and corrective actions identified/implemented What you need to know: • This document provides a detailed description of each of the freight mobility corridors. • This document can be used as a starting point to help • Develop long-range comprehensive and transportation plans; • Make zoning decisions regarding land use along designated freight corridors; • Provide weight in selecting cost affordable road projects that are of economic; importance to the community; and • Designate new areas for development into freight activity centers. What you need to do: • Find ways to improve access to existing freight activity centers. • Designate a Freight Advisory Committee within the MPOs to provide expertise and advocacy on freight issues. • Develop new land use policies that insulate industrial areas and their access corridors from residential encroachment. • Know what you have--Consider detailed corridor studies for each of the designated Regional Freight Mobility Corridors focusing physical and operational improvements that will make the movement of goods easier. CHAPTER 1.0 INTRODUCTION This supporting document to the Tampa Bay Regional Goods Movement Study focuses on the regional freight mobility corridors located within the five-county region of Citrus, Hernando, Hillsborough, Pasco, and Pinellas Counties that together comprise District VII of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The Study was developed in response to local freight mobility concerns and provisions set forth in the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21). This document identifies and describes the regionally significant goods movement corridors in the region to help focus improvement efforts on corridors with the most impact on local and regional economies. These corridors include roadways on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS), and regional connectors as well as the CSX Transportation (CSXT) rail corridors that serve the Tampa Bay Region. The Tampa Bay Region’s economic productivity is dependent on a transportation system that can handle goods efficiently and safely. Tampa Bay’s seaports, airports, and railroads have long been a cornerstone of the area’s economic prosperity. These intermodal activity centers are projected to have continued growth in the foreseeable future. This growth will largely depend upon the ability to improve and maintain efficient transportation connections to all parts of the region and surrounding areas. Improving the transportation system that serves intermodal centers and other economic activity centers is an important factor in attracting new industry and higher paying jobs that will stimulate the local economy and provide local governments with higher tax revenues. FDOT D7 1-1 APRIL 2006 The regional freight transportation network can be divided into three systems: highway corridors, rail corridors, and waterways. These complementary systems are essential for moving goods within the region. The area’s roadway system is the foundation of effective and efficient goods movement in the region. Like the seaports, airports, and railroads, virtually every business and household in the region is dependent to some extent on the mobility of trucks for shipping and receiving goods. Trucks are an important means of sustaining the community by delivering products to stores for purchase; transporting raw materials and finished products for industries; hauling materials for the construction of roads, schools, businesses, and homes; and other important functions. Trailers and containers are not simply boxes filled with goods that clog our highways but rather, represent many of the positive aspects of a thriving economy. Providing a safe, well-planned, surface transportation system to efficiently move goods while preserving personal mobility is becoming an increasingly significant concern as our roads become more congested. DRAFT CHAPTER 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1-2 FREIGHT MOBILITY CORRIDORS Regional Freight Mobility Corridors play a key role in transporting goods and raw materials beyond the local area. Major emphasis is placed on the uninterrupted movement of goods between major freight activity centers and the statewide Regional Freight Mobility Corridors strategic freight corridors. They improve the general circulation of traffic by focusing regional and interstate truck activity on certain designated roadway facilities. Regional Freight Mobility Corridors Regional Freight Mobility Corridors were designated throughout the region to provide include roadways, rail lines, and a transportation network for the efficient movement of goods while minimizing waterways that are essential to efficient potential impacts of trucking to community assets such as neighborhoods and movement of goods to, from, and within ecosystems. the region. The regional corridors include all of the designated freight related The purpose of designating these corridors is to influence regional economic facilities of the Statewide Strategic development through the implementation of policies and actions that will improve Intermodal System in the region and other and preserve freight mobility in the corridors. The Regional Freight Mobility Corridors regional freight corridors serving were identified by reviewing and evaluating the Statewide Strategic Trade Corridors important regional freight activity included in FDOT’s Multimodal Trade Corridor Assessment Study (Phase I) and the centers. Florida Freight Network and Modal Connector Study (Phase II), the Strategic Intermodal System Plan, and the freight activity centers defined in the Tampa Bay Regional Goods Movement Study. Freight Mobility "Hot Spots" are identified, where appropriate, along the corridors. Hot spots are locations that impede trucking operations. The purpose of identifying these locations is to help prioritize funding to implement the appropriate solutions in the near term that will improve goods movement and safety along the corridor. "Hot Spots" were identified at numerous locations throughout the region through a combination of trucker surveys and technical staff inputs. The "Hot Spots" identified in this document are only those found on the regional corridors and are a subset of a much broader data set that includes local truck routes and other roads. 1-3 APRIL 2006 The following considerations were used to define Regional Freight Mobility Corridors: Freight Friendly Design Criteria • • The shortest and most direct routes from Provides access to designated regional freight activity centers, major activity centers to the national and statewide strategic highway network • Provides connectivity between freight activity centers, • Grade separations at major intersections • and rail crossings to promote continuous Provides local connectivity between freight activity centers and Statewide movement of traffic and reduce delay Strategic Trade Corridors, • Channelization/separation of thru traffic • Carries significant truck volume, from local traffic through heavily congetsted corridors • Significantly contributes to a reduction of trucks on other roadway corridors, • Longer acceleration and deceleration and lanes to accommodate large trucks • Longer and/or multiple holding/turning • Compatibility of existing and planned land uses in the corridor. lanes at intersections • Wider turning radii to accommodate long Table 1 depicts all of the Regional Freight Mobility Corridors including roadway and tractor trailers rail corridors, as well as the Regional Freight Activity Centers. • Synchronization of traffic signals to accommodate truck flows and to Freight mobility can be preserved and enhanced within these designated minimize delay for all vehicles transportation corridors through the implementation of access management • Improved signage clearly directing freight strategies, “freight friendly” design criteria, land use controls, and the discouragement traffic to the major activity centers such of incompatible land uses adjacent to freight corridors and activity centers. Access as ports, airports, rail intermodal control refers to where and how freight and non-freight vehicles enter and exit the facilities, and industrial parks corridor. Freight-friendly design criteria refers to roadway design improvements that enhance the flow of freight movement and minimize delay wherever possible. Land- use controls/decisions refers to planning and providing for compatible uses in a corridor or reorienting land uses by implementing local policies or land development regulations that specify how land is developed in the corridor. DRAFT CHAPTER 1.0 – INTRODUCTION
Recommended publications
  • Transportation Element 08-08-08 – NON ADOPTED PORTION
    Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough County Florida TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT As Amended by the Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners June 5, 2008 (Ordinance 08- 13) Department of Community Affairs Notice of Intent to Find Comprehensive Plan Amendments in Compliance published August 4, 2008 {DCA PA No. 08-1ER-NOI-2901- (A)-(l)} August 26, 2008 Effective Date This Page Intentionally Blank. 2 Hillsborough County Transportation Element Hillsborough County Transportation Element TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 7 II. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS ............................................................ 15 III. FUTURE NEEDS AND ALTERNATIVES............................................ 81 IV. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES............................................121 V. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING ..................................161 VI. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................167 Sections IV, V, VI, Appendix C, D, G, I, and Appendix J Maps 2, 2B, 15, and 25 of the Transportation Element have been adopted by the Board of County Commissioners as required by Part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The remainder of the Transportation Element and appendices contains background information. Hillsborough County Transportation Element 3 TRANSPORTATION APPENDIX A-J Appendix A Inventory of State Roads in Hillsborough County Appendix B Inventory of County Roads
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Economy/Tourism
    Chapter 6 Economy/Tourism Table of Contents 6.0 Economy/Tourism ........................................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Measuring Performance: Freight and Economic Development Report .... 6-2 6.2 Port Manatee Master Plan ................................................................................. 6-4 6.3 Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport Master Plan ............................... 6-7 List of Figures Figure 6-1: Major Regional Freight Generators ............................................................ 6-2 Figure 6-2: Port Manatee Tonnage (in 000 short tons) .............................................. 6-5 Figure 6-3: Market Share of Enplanements Forecast ................................................. 6-7 List of Tables Table 6-1: Bridges 2015 AADT and Truck Volume Share ........................................... 6-3 Table 6-2: Planned Road and Port Improvements ....................................................... 6-6 Supporting Documents • Measuring Performance: Freight and Economic Development Report • Port Manatee Master Plan • Airport Master Plan Update Working Plan #1 i Chapter 6: Economy/Tourism 6.0 Economy/Tourism Economy/Tourism Keeping freight moving is essential to the local economy. Objectives Improve accessibility and multi modal connectivity by Projects shall… promoting proximity to jobs and efficient movement of freight and goods. Stimulate economy in enterprise or economic Economy and Tourism within the LRTP can be easily development zones
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee Michael Maurino Monday, October 19, 2020 @ 1:30 PM Planning Commission
    Commissioner The County Center and Plan Hillsborough offices are closed to the public in response Lesley “Les” Miller, Jr. Hillsborough County to the COVID-19 pandemic. Members of the public may access this meeting and MPO Chairman participate via the GoToMeeting link above, or by phoning in and visiting the Plan Commissioner Pat Kemp Hillsborough website for the agenda packet and presentation slides. Please mute Hillsborough County MPO Vice Chair yourself upon joining the meeting. For technical support during the meeting, please Paul Anderson contact Jason Krzyzanowski at (813) 273-3774 ext. 327. Port Tampa Bay Councilman Joseph Citro City of Tampa Virtual Meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee Michael Maurino Monday, October 19, 2020 @ 1:30 PM Planning Commission Commissioner Ken Hagan Hillsborough County To view presentations and participate your computer, table or smartphone: Mayor Andrew Ross City of Temple Terrace https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/4217036520846369549 Joe Lopano Hillsborough County Aviation Authority Register in advance to receive your personalized link, which can be saved to your Mayor Rick A. Lott calendar. City of Plant City Councilman Guido Maniscalco Dial in LISTEN-ONLY MODE: 1-914-614-3221 Access Code: 505-461-299 City of Tampa Adam Harden Agenda packet, presentations, and supplemental materials posted here. HART Commissioner Please mute yourself after joining the conference call to minimize background noise. Kimberly Overman Hillsborough County Commissioner I. Committee Soundcheck 15 minutes prior to meeting Mariella Smith Hillsborough County II. Call to Order Public Comment - 3 minutes per speaker, please Cindy Stuart Hillsborough County Public comments are welcome, and may be given in person at this School Board teleconference meeting, by logging into the website above and clicking the “raise Councilman John Dingfelder City of Tampa hand” button.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Freight Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan
    final report 2004 Freight Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan prepared for Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4445 Willard Avenue, Suite 300 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 with Charles River Associates June 2005 final report 2004 Freight Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan prepared for Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4445 Willard Avenue, Suite 300 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 with Charles River Associates Inc. June 2005 2004 Freight Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 Purpose........................................................................................................................... ES-1 Florida’s Rail System.................................................................................................... ES-2 Freight Rail and the Florida Economy ....................................................................... ES-7 Trends and Issues.......................................................................................................... ES-15 Future Rail Investment Needs .................................................................................... ES-17 Strategies and Funding Opportunities ...................................................................... ES-19 Recommendations........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice
    State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice The following Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy bonds. It is marked with a dated date and speaks only as of that date, which may be prior to the date the Official Statement was posted on this website. The Division of Bond Finance undertakes no obligation to update any information included therein except for certain annual and periodic reports which may be found on the EMMA website of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. This Official Statement may be removed from the website at any time. The information, estimates and expressions of opinion in the Official Statement are subject to change without notice and the posting of the Official Statement on this website does not imply that there has been no change in such information or the affairs of the State of Florida since the dated date of the Official Statement or date of posting such Official Statement. New Issue - Book-Entry Only This Official Statement has been prepared to provide information about the 2019A Bonds. Selected information is presented on this cover page for the convenience of the reader. To make an informed decision, a prospective investor should read this Official Statement in its entirety. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms have the meanings given in Appendix A. $86,640,000 STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Transportation Sunshine Skyway Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown on the inside front cover Bond Ratings
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Discusses the Various Design/Build Alternatives, As Well As the No-Build Alternative
    SUMMARY AND COMMITMENTS S.1 INTRODUCTION The potential for high speed rail to address a portion of the transportation needs of the State of Florida has a long history. The current effort to evaluate high speed rail’s potential was initiated following an enactment by Florida’s voters. In November 2000, Florida’s voters adopted an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Florida that mandated the construction of a high speed transportation system in the state. The amendment required the use of train technologies that operate at speeds in excess of 120 miles per hour (mph) and consist of dedicated rails or guideways separated from motor vehicle traffic. The system was to link the five largest urban areas of Florida and construction was mandated to begin by November 1, 2003, to address a high speed ground transportation system. The purpose of Article 10, Section 19 of the Constitution of the State of Florida was, “to reduce traffic congestion and provide alternatives to the traveling public.” In June 2001, the Florida State Legislature, through the Florida High Speed Rail Authority Act, created the Florida High Speed Rail Authority (FHSRA) and charged the organization with the responsibility for planning, administering, and implementing a high speed rail system in Florida. The act also mandated that the initial segment of the system be developed and operated between St. Petersburg, Tampa, and Orlando areas with future service to the Miami area. Following its creation in 2001, the FHSRA proceeded to implement the responsibilities set forth in the Florida High Speed Rail Authority Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildwood Food Pantry Letter of Recognition
    BOARD OF SUMTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Chairman - Garry Breeden - District 4 Vice Chairman - Craig Estep - District 3 2 nd Vice Chairman - Oren Miller - District 5 Gary Search - District 1 Doug Gilpin - District 2 December 22, 2020 5:00 PM PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES ANY PERSON WHO MAY FEEL THE NEED TO APPEAL A BOARD DECISION IS HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR YOU TO PROVIDE YOUR OWN VERBATIM RECORDING OF THE BOARDS MINUTES OR ANY PORTION THEREOF Any person requiring reasonable accommodation at this meeting because of, disability, physical impairment, or interpretation needs should contact the County Administrator's Office, 7375 Powell Road, Wildwood, FL 34785 (352) 689-4400 at least two days before the meeting. Meeting Location: Everglades Regional Recreation Center (5497 Marsh Bend Trail, Grand Canyon Room, The Villages, FL 32163) AGENDA MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER BY THE CHAIRMAN INVOCATION FLAG SALUTE 1. TIMED ITEMS & PUBLIC HEARINGS None 2. REPORTS AND INPUT a. Letter of Recognition - Wildwood Food Pantry Documents: Letter of Recognition - Wildwood Food Pantry.pdf b. County Administrator 1. Letter to Ron Brown, Charter Oaks Real Estate, CR 462(For Direction) Documents: CR 462 Realignment Letter.pdf 2. Notice of Award for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) County Grant, ID Code C9060 in the amount of $17,834.00 (For Information Only). Documents: Emergency Medical Services Grant.pdf c. County Attorney d. Clerk of Circuit Court e. Board Members f. Public Forum 3. NEW BUSINESS - ACTION REQUIRED a. MINUTES 1. Minutes of Regular Meeting held on November 24, 2020 (Staff Recommends Approval).
    [Show full text]
  • Selmon Expressway Western Extension – Gandy Boulevard Assessment Adaptation Strategies and Recommendations
    Selmon Expressway Western Extension – Gandy Boulevard Assessment Adaptation Strategies and Recommendations June 2016 Selmon Expressway Western Extension - Gandy Boulevard Assessment Adaptation Strategies and Recommendations prepared for Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization for Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 2101 West Commercial Boulevard, Suite 3200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 with Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. Resilient Analytics, Inc. date June 2016 Gandy Boulevard Implementation Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Gandy Boulevard ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Potential for Storm Surge and Inundation.................................................................................. 1-4 2.0 Adaptation Options ............................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Do Nothing ................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Erosion Control .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FDOT District Six Begins Move to Full Color Dynamic Message Signs
    ® DISSEMINATOR Florida Department of Transportation’s Traffic Engineering and Operations Newsletter Partnering with FHWA for Connected Vehicle Inside This Issue By Steve Novosad, Atkins July 2014 The Florida Department of Transportation Partnering with FHWA for (FDOT) has partnered with the Federal Connected Vehicle ............................. 1 Highway Administration (FHWA) on the Integrated Vehicle-to-Infrastructure RISC Rotator Truck Debuted in Prototype (IVP) project. The IVP project FDOT District Four .............................. 2 provides a full complement of Improving Communications infrastructure capability—supporting During Emergencies ............................ 4 vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) FDOT District Six Begins Move to communications‐based connected Full Color Dynamic Message Signs ..... 5 vehicle applications and documenting Spreading Awareness About Systems the design and prototype to enable Engineering ......................................... 6 subsequent implementation activities by other parties. This project provides the basis ITS Florida: Intelligent Transportation Systems – Fifty Years Ago? .................. 8 for moving the V2I connected vehicle research program towards implementation. The initial phase of this project is being conducted Editorial Corner: Improving at the Turner Fairbanks Highway Research Center (TFHRC). FHWA is developing Processes .......................................... 10 a prototype platform that will be provided to FDOT for installation in various Announcements ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Mccook, Kathleen De La Pena the Florida Library History Project
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 422 005 IR 057 129 AUTHOR Jasper, Catherine; McCook, Kathleen de la Pena TITLE The Florida Library History Project. INSTITUTION University of South Florida, Tampa. PUB DATE 1998-08-00 NOTE 483p. PUB TYPE Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF02/PC20 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Information Technology; Library Collections; *Library Development; Library Personnel; *Library Services; Library Statistics; Library Surveys; *Public Libraries; State Programs IDENTIFIERS *Florida; *Library History ABSTRACT The Florida Library History Project (FLHP) began in January 1998. Letters requesting histories were sent to all public libraries in Florida with follow-up letters sent after an initial response was received from the libraries. E-mail messages were sent out to FL-LIB listservs encouraging participation in the project. A poster session was presented by Catherine Jasper at the 1998 Florida Library Association (FLA) Annual Conference, an event that marked FLA's 75th anniversary. At the end of this funding period, 89 library systems and organizations had provided histories. These have been compiled and are reproduced in this volume as submitted by participating libraries. Highlights include library founding, collections, services, budgets and expenditures, personnel, funding, survey results, technology, and developments. (AEF) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *************************************************.*******************************
    [Show full text]
  • TAMPA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1977-78 M Rs
    Sunland Tribune Volume 4 Article 1 1978 Full Issue Sunland Tribune Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune Recommended Citation Tribune, Sunland (1978) "Full Issue," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 4 , Article 1. Available at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune/vol4/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sunland Tribune by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SUNLAND TRIBUNE On Our Cover Volume IV Number 1 November, 1978 Old post card depicts Gordon Keller Journal of the Memorial Hospital, a "permanent TAMPA monument" to the memory of City HISTORICAL SOCIETY Treasurer and merchant Gordon Tampa, Florida Keller. HAMPTON DUNN Editor -Photo from HAMPTON DUNN COLLECTION Officers DR. L. GLENN WESTFALL 7DEOHRI&RQWHQWV President MRS. DAVID McCLAIN GORDON WHO? GORDON KELLER 2 Vice President By Hampton Dunn MRS. MARTHA TURNER Corresponding Secretary TAMPA HEIGHTS: MRS. THOMAS MURPHY TAMPA'S FIRST RESIDENTIAL SUBURB 6 Recording Secretary By Marston C. Leonard MRS. DONN GREGORY Treasurer FAMOUS CHART RECOVERED 11 Board of Directors I REMEMBER AUNT KATE 12 Mrs. A. M. Barrow Dr. James W. Covington By Lula Joughin Dovi Hampton Dunn Mrs. James L. Ferman Mrs. Joanne Frasier THE STORY OF DAVIS ISLANDS 1924-1926 16 Mrs. Thomas L. Giddens By Dr. James W. Covington Mrs. Donn Gregory Mrs. John R. Himes Mrs. Samuel 1. Latimer, Jr. DR. HOWELL TYSON LYKES Marston C. (Bob) Leonard Mrs. David McClain FOUNDER OF AN EMPIRE 30 Mrs. Thomas Murphy By James M.
    [Show full text]
  • Segmental Bridge Construction in Florida — a Review and Perspective
    Special Report Segmental Bridge Construction in Florida — A Review and Perspective by Alan J. Moreton, P.E. State Structures Engineer Florida Department of Transportation Tallahassee, Florida 36 SYNOPSIS This paper offers an overview of the precast concrete segmental bridges designed and built in the state of Florida during the last ten years. The article summarizes various statistical structural parameters, segment manufacturing and erection methods, construction times, costs, and reviews problems typically encountered. Also included is a discussion of current industry and nationwide design and construction practices and some suggestions for possible improvements. CONTENTS Synopsis............................................37 1. Introduction ......................................38 2. Precast Segmental Bridges ........................38 3. Florida's Segmental Bridges .......................44 4. Structural Parametrics .............................44 5. Casting Yard Operations ...........................48 6. Rejected Segments .............................. 49 7. Erection Operations ...............................50 8. Some Typical Problems ...........................52 9. Time ............................................55 10. Costs ...........................................57 11. Administration Processes — Design, Construction andShop Drawings ...............................60 12. Actions by the Florida Department of Transportation ...63 13. Benefits of Segmental Bridges ......................64 14. Summary ........................................65
    [Show full text]