Southern Fleurieu Coastal Action Plan and Conservation Priority Study 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southern Fleurieu Coastal Action Plan and Conservation Priority Study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urpose of the Study .........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Definition of the Southern Fleurieu Coast .......................................................................................1 1.3 Definition of Coastal Cells.................................................................................................................2 1.3.1 Action Summary Table ................................................................................................................................................ 3 2 DESCRIPTION OF THEMES AND DATABASES.................................................15 2.1 Conservation Layers........................................................................................................................16 2.1.1 Communities and Species with Threatened Status ................................................................................................... 16 2.1.2 Endemic Species and Communities; Biodiversity...................................................................................................... 19 2.1.3 Significant Bird Habitats of the Fleurieu Peninsula .................................................................................................... 20 2.1.4 Significant Reptiles and Amphibian Habitats in Southern Fleurieu ............................................................................ 21 2.1.5 Significant Butterfly Habitats of the Southern Fleurieu............................................................................................... 23 2.1.6 Focal Species Within the Southern Fleurieu.............................................................................................................. 23 2.1.7 Fragmentation and Isolation of Remnant Vegetation Communities ........................................................................... 24 2.1.8 Heritage..................................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.2 Threatening Processes Layers .......................................................................................................26 2.2.1 Acid Sulphate Soils ................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.2.2 Campsites ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 2.2.3 Development Potential .............................................................................................................................................. 26 2.2.4 Dump and Wastewater Processing Sites................................................................................................................... 26 2.2.5 Dune Stability ............................................................................................................................................................ 27 2.2.6 Cliff Stability .............................................................................................................................................................. 27 2.2.7 Land Ownership ........................................................................................................................................................ 27 2.2.8 Land Use................................................................................................................................................................... 27 2.2.9 Mining Activities......................................................................................................................................................... 27 2.2.10 Vegetation Isolation................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.11 Vegetation Degradation............................................................................................................................................. 28 2.2.12 Vegetation Patch Shape............................................................................................................................................ 28 2.2.13 Vegetation Patch Size ............................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.14 Viewshed Analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.15 Viewscape Analysis................................................................................................................................................... 29 2.2.16 Distribution of known environmental weeds............................................................................................................... 29 2.3 Method Of Rating Priority................................................................................................................29 2.3.1 Using Desktop GIS Analysis to Highlight Conservation Priorities Within This Study.................................................. 29 2.4 GIS Datasets Table...........................................................................................................................30 2.5 Variation of Data Coverage Between Coastal Cells......................................................................38 3 CONSERVATION THEMES ..................................................................................43 3.1 Flora ..................................................................................................................................................43 3.1.1 Native Vegetation Cover............................................................................................................................................ 43 3.1.2 Floristic Communities ................................................................................................................................................ 44 3.1.3 Saltmarshes ............................................................................................................................................................. 58 3.1.4 Coastal Plant Species ............................................................................................................................................... 60 3.2 Birds ..................................................................................................................................................63 3.2.1 Bush Birds ...............................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Southern & Hills Local Government
    HDS Australia Civil Engineers and Project Managers Southern & Hills Local Government Association 2020 TRANSPORT PLAN – 2015 UPDATE Adelaide Final Report Melbourne Hong Kong HDS Australia Pty Ltd 277 Magill Road Trinity Gardens SA 5068 telephone +61 8 8333 3760 facsimile +61 8 8333 3079 email [email protected] www.hdsaustralia.com.au December 2016 Safe and Sustainable Road Transport Planning Solutions Southern & Hills Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd Key Regional Transport Infrastructure Initiatives Freight Development of the South Coast Freight Corridor as a primary cross regional gazetted 26m B-Double GML route (ultimately upgraded to a PBS Level 2A route) running from Cape Jervis, via Victor Harbor and Strathalbyn, to the South East Freeway Interchange at Callington, with a branch to Mount Barker. Development of the Southern Vales Wine Freight Corridor as a secondary cross regional gazetted 26m B-Double GML route running from McLaren Vale to the South East Freeway Interchange at Mount Barker. Development of the Kangaroo Island Freight Corridor as a secondary cross regional gazetted 23m B-Double GML route (upgraded to 26m B- Double when the Sealink Ferry capability permits) running from Gosse to Penneshaw, then via the Ferry to Cape Jervis. Tourism Development of the Fleurieu Way as a primary cross regional tourism route, suitably signposted and promoted, from Wellington, via Strathalbyn, Goolwa, Victor Harbor, Delamere / Cape Jervis, Normanville / Yankalilla, Aldinga, Willunga and McLaren Vale, to Adelaide. Development of the Kangaroo Island South Coast Loop and North Coast Loop as primary regional tourism routes, suitably signposted and promoted, and connected via the Sealink Ferry and the Fleurieu Way to Adelaide and Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandrina Council Submission
    Ref: 18.89.001 File: GR:sm 26 July 2019 Regions SA Primary Industries and Regions SA GPO Box 167 ADELAIDE SA 500 Via email to: [email protected] Re: Regional Development Strategy Discussion Paper – Alexandrina Council Submission Alexandrina Council is one of the State’s largest regional Councils, as well as one of the State’s fastest growing communities. We believe a focus on regional development by all three levels of government is essential to both the wellbeing of our community, but also the prosperity of the State, and we welcome the renewed focus and energy being directed toward regional development by the Government of South Australia. The following table provides a snap shot of Alexandrina Council and what our district contributes to the Fleurieu region and the State of South Australia. ALEXANDRINA AT A GLANCE … Federal Electorate of Mayo State Electorates of Finniss, Heysen, Hammond and Mawson Home of ‘Storm Boy’ and the Coorong, Home of the SA Wooden Boat Festival at Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth the iconic Goolwa Wharf One of the largest regional Councils in SA Population of 27,000 residents at average with approximately $50 million annual growth rate of 1.3% (sea change and tree turnover change impacts) $1 billion local economy driven by Ageing region with a median age of 51 agriculture, tourism, health and social years (being 11 years above the State services average of 40 years). Strong social capital with 28% volunteerism High seasonal visitation to pristine natural rates attractions and appealing destinations Service Provision Whilst the core, essential service needs of any community are very similar no matter where they are located, the unique geography and demographics of a particular region will have significant implications for the optimal method and mechanisms of service delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 19 / 20
    Country SA PHN Annual Report 19/20 1 Annual Report 19 / 20 Contents Chair of the Board Report 2 Chief Executive Officer Report 3 Chair of Finance Report 6 Regional Health Priorities Statistics 8 Our Priority Areas 17 Reconciliation Action Plan 32 Local Health Clusters 36 2 Country SA PHN Annual Report 19/20 Chair of the Board Report The 2019-20 year has been anything Additional funding was also provided but routine, but the Country SA PHN to enable the establishment of (CSAPHN) has stepped up to the plate specific Respiratory Clinics and and been a strong voice for the role enhanced Respiratory focus in smaller of primary health care at the forefront clinics across our patch. Our senior of bushfire recovery and pandemics. staff are to be congratulated on our positioning in this arena with a much The Board took pause last year and stronger presence than seen in undertook an external review to see other states. what areas of good governance required more attention and has As well as the specific challenges made some changes to internal and thrown at us in the past year, CSAPHN Board processes in response to this. has continued with business as usual We expected to swing into 2020 in commissioning, monitoring and “As well as the with a new found vigour only to reviewing the range of services we specific challenges be pushed back by the devastation commission across all of rural SA. It of the bushfires across our regions is a credit to all our staff and service thrown at us in the hotly followed by the need to modify providers that we have managed to past year, CSAPHN our business processes due to the maintain this despite the difficulties precautions put in place around presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleurieu Peninsula
    Fleurieu Peninsula Coastal Boundary Reference Map Index 250000 300000 6100000 Strathalbyn Major Roads Fleurieu Map Blocks Fleurieu Coastal Boundary Fleurieu Councils Of Interest Dodd Beach Map Block ALEXANDRINA COUNCIL Myponga Map Block 0 10 Yankalilla Normanville Kms Map Block Rapid Head Port Elliot Map Block Map Block Goolwa THE DC OF YANKALILLA CITY OF VICTOR HARBOR Murray Mouth Wirrina Cove Victor Harbor Map Block Map Block Map Block Goolwa Victor Harbor Map Block Cape Jervis Cape Jervis Tunkalilla Beach Parsons Beach Newland Head Map Block Map Block Map Block Map Block Deep Creek CP Map Block West Island Map Block Produced by Environmental Information 6050000 Department for Environment and Heritage PO Box 550 Marleston SA 5033 Web: www.environment.sa.gov.au/mapland Data Source Coastal Boundary - EI & CPB - DEH Veg Block Data - EI & CPB - DEH Base Data - Topo Data - DEH Projection Lambert Conformal Conic Compiled 11 April 2006 6050000 Datum Geocentric Datum of Australia, 1994 Grid MGA - Zone 54 © Copyright Department for Environment and Heritage 2005. All Rights Reserved. All works and information displayed are subject to Copyright. For the reproduction Or publication beyond that permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth) written permission must be sought from the Department. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information displayed, the Department, its agents, officers and employees make no representations, either express or implied, that the information displayed is accurate or fit for any purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Kungun Ngarrindjeri Yunnan Agreement Listening to Ngarrindjeri People Talking KNYA Taskforce Report 2010-11
    Kungun Ngarrindjeri Yunnan Agreement Listening to Ngarrindjeri People talking KNYA Taskforce Report 2010-11 www.environment.sa.gov.au Acknowledgements The Ngarrindjeri people are the descendents of the original indigenous inhabitants of the lands and waters of the Murray River, Lower Lakes and Coorong and adjacent areas. Ngarrindjeri have occupied, enjoyed, utilised and managed these traditional homelands since time immemorial. The South Australian Government acknowledges Ngarrindjeri are the Traditional Owners of the land and that according to their traditions, customs and spiritual beliefs its lands and waters remain their traditional country. The State also acknowledges and respects the rights, interests and obligations of Ngarrindjeri to speak and care for their traditional country, lands and waters in accordance with their laws, customs, beliefs and traditions. The KNYA Taskforce Planning Workshop was part of the South Australian Government’s Murray Futures program, funded by the Australian Government’s Water for the Future program. Caution when reading this report The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) will always make every effort to respect Ngarrindjeri cultural sensitivities when featuring images or names of people who have recently died. However please be advised that this document may contain images of persons who have died after this Annual Report was finalised in January 2012 and we offer our apologies for any distress caused if this occurs. Younghusband Peninsula in Coorong National Park Contents In Memory of the late Ngarrindjeri Chairs of the KNYA Taskforce . .. 5 Messages from the Co-chairpersons of the Taskforce . 6 KNYA Purpose . 8 Our Performance – KNYA Taskforce Review of 2010-11 .
    [Show full text]
  • Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site PLACE NO.: 26454
    South Australian HERITAGE COUNCIL SUMMARY OF STATE HERITAGE PLACE REGISTER ENTRY Entry in the South Australian Heritage Register in accordance with the Heritage Places Act 1993 NAME: Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site PLACE NO.: 26454 ADDRESS: Franklin Parade, Encounter Bay, SA 5211 Uncovered well 23 November 2017 Site works complete June 2019 Source DEW Source DEW Cultural Safety Warning Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples should be aware that this document may contain images or names of people who have since passed away. STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE The Rosetta Head Well and Whaling Station Site is on the lands and waters of the Ramindjeri people of the lower Fleurieu Peninsula, who are a part of the Ngarrindjeri Nation. The site represents a once significant early industry that no longer exists in South Australia. Founded by the South Australian Company in 1837 and continually operating until 1851, it was the longest-running whaling station in the State. It played an important role in the establishment of the whaling industry in South Australia as a prototype for other whaling stations and made a notable contribution to the fledgling colony’s economic development. The Rosetta Head Whaling Station is also an important contact site between European colonists and the Ramindjeri people. To Ramindjeri people, the whale is known as Kondli (a spiritual being), and due to their connection and knowledge, a number of Ramindjeri were employed at the station as labourers and boat crews. Therefore, Rosetta Head is one of the first places in South Australia where European and Aboriginal people worked side by side.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Document
    INFORMATION DOCUMENT 23 June 2020 Department Commencing page Office of the Chief Executive Officer CEO – meetings/functions attended Minutes received from external organisations & groups Community engagement 2 Tourism development Arts & culture Community development Coorong Tatiara Local Action Plan Community & Corporate Development & Environmental Services report – May 2020 Organisational development report 22 Monthly credit card report IT services update Infrastructure & Assets ‘In the Field’ works report 30 Drought Communities Programme Extension – projects update Cleanaway activity report – May 2020 Information Document – June 2020 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Information items 1. CEO - MEETINGS/FUNCTIONS ATTENDED Date Details May 2020 20 Introductory meeting with Ngarrindjeri Aboriginal Corporation representatives. Tailem Bend 21 Meeting with STARclub Murraylands Field Officer, M Maddaford re: plans for district’s sports & recreation as a result of COVID-19, Tailem Bend 22 Meeting with resident S Douglas re: various matters, Tailem Bend 22 Meeting with residents M & B Piggott re: promotion and development Tailem Bend township, Tailem Bend 22 Visit to Tailem Bend District Hospital with Director of Nursing S Nagel and Cr. Qualmann, Tailem Bend 25 Meeting at Meningie Town Oval re: proposed Meningie Skate Park project with J Williams and F Turner (Meningie Combined Sports Ground), Lakes Ward Councillors, Mayor and Director Infrastructure & Assets, Meningie 26 Meeting with Tailem Bend Netball Club representatives re: leasing
    [Show full text]
  • CEMETERIES TOURS YANKALILLA DISTRICT TOUR 4: Bullaparinga Public Cemetery Old Council Chambers Rd, Bullaparinga
    CEMETERIES TOURS YANKALILLA DISTRICT TOUR 4: Bullaparinga Public Cemetery Old Council Chambers Rd, Bullaparinga The Bullaparinga Public Cemetery was laid out in November 1858, and fenced the following year. An early burial ground is outside the bounds of the cemetery, but the early records have been lost. The earliest recorded burials begin in April 1859. James Chirgwin: A5 The oldest head stone in the cemetery is that of James Chirgwin (only his initials, J.C. are on the stone), who died 18 March, 1861. James was born 14 January 1861, and so was only 2 months old when he died. He was the first child of John and Eliza Chirgwin, neé Comley, who had a total of eleven children. John Chirgwin, a miner, arrived at Port Adelaide 23 March 1848 on the David Malcolm. He settled at Bullaparinga. Henri Benedictus Salman van Raalte was born in England in 1881. He studied art at London and Royal Academy schools. In 1901 he was elected an Associate of the Royal Society of Painters, Etchers, and Engravers. Due to ill health he emigrated to Western Australia. In 1921 van Raalte accepted the position of Curator of the South Australian Art Gallery, but resigned in 1925 because of a difference of opinion with the Gallery’s Board of Governors. Van Raalte with his wife and three sons came to Second Valley, living at first in one of the Junction North Timber Mill cottages at Second Valley Beach, Henri van Raalte: A16 and then renting a house vacated by the Cant family. Van Raalte set up his studio there.
    [Show full text]
  • Murray and Mallee Local Government Association
    MURRAY AND MALLEE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION. ANNUAL REPORT - 2003/2004. Comprising – The Berri Barmera Council; Coorong District Council; District Council of Karoonda East Murray; District Council of Loxton Waikerie; Mid Murray Council; The Rural City of Murray Bridge; Renmark Paringa Council; and Southern Mallee District Council. 2 PRESIDENT’S ANNUAL REPORT. Having been given the honour of being the President of the Murray & Mallee Local Government Association (M&MLGA) in June 2003, I would like to say a big thank you to those who served before me. The previous Mayor of Loxton-Waikerie, Jan Cass did a lot of work in her role as President of the M&MLGA and I would like to acknowledge her great contribution to our organization. We have been kept busy on the M&MLGA front with bimonthly meetings held in our Region that have been well supported by the member councils and we have enjoyed great communications from our LGA Executive. One of the main topics lately has been the Natural Resource Management Bill. We are all waiting to find out how it will all work and the input from State Executive has been great. Thank you. Ken Coventry has continued to serve the M&MLGA well as he organises all our guest speakers and represents us on a lot of other committees. He has, however, now indicated he wishes to retire as Chief Executive Officer of the M&MLGA and will stay in place until we appoint a new CEO. On behalf of the M&MLGA I would like to say a big thank you to Ken for his untiring work and dedication to his duty and he will be sorely missed.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Engagement Policies in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America Appendix C July, 2012
    Report for the City of Guelph: Community Engagement Policies in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America Appendix C July, 2012 Kim Chuong, Kathryn Walton, and Morgan Marini The Research Shop, University of Guelph APPENDIX C Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Australia Melbourne, Victoria ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Engagement Framework ......................................................................................................................... 7 State of Victoria policy ............................................................................................................................ 8 Onkaparinga, South Australia ....................................................................................................................... 13 Engagement Framework ........................................................................................................................ 13 Engagement Handbook ......................................................................................................................... 15 State of South Australia ................................................................................................................................ 22 Community Engagement Handbook: Model Framework for Leading Practice in Local
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia V
    MOUNT LOFTY RANGES, SOUTH AUSTRALIA V. Tokarev and V. Gostin Department Geology and Geophysics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 [email protected] INTRODUCTION would correlate with sedimentation within and around the Mount The Mount Lofty Ranges is an arcuate north–south oriented Lofty Ranges. Our method included Digital Elevation Model upland region in South Australia flanked by the St. Vincent and (DEM) data processing and visualisation, geomorphological western Murray Basins. This paper focuses on the southern analysis, field survey, and neotectonic structural interpretation. part of the Ranges between the Fleurieu Peninsula in the south This enabled us to define the main features of regolith–landscape and the Torrens River in the north (Figure 1). Traditionally, the response to the Middle Eocene–Middle Miocene neotectonic Mount Lofty Ranges was considered to be an intraplate region deformation and sea-level change. uplifted since the early Tertiary with inherited tectonic fabrics from the Delamerian structure (~500 Ma). Previous models refer to Eocene uplift resulting from compressional reactivation along PRE-MIDDLE EOCENE PALAEOPLAIN Paleozoic faults (e.g., Benbow et al., 1995; Love et al., 1995). The Gondwanan glaciation was widespread throughout the A new model of neotectonic movements, independent of ancient Australian continent. This glaciation played a significant role tectonic fabrics controlling landscape and regolith development in post-Delamerian landscape planation by eroding local uplifts has been proposed by Tokarev et al. (1999). and infilling many small depressions. Preservation of Permian landforms and sediments within this region highlights post- In this study we incorporate both neotectonic movements Permian tectonic quiescence, landscape planation and deep and sea-level change as factors governing landscape and weathering and thus provides important evidence of post-Middle regolith evolution within the southern part of the Mount Lofty Ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Encounter Marine Park
    CITY OF PORT ADELAIDE ENFIELD 137°45'0"E 138°0'0"E 138°15'0"E 138°3T0'0H"EE CITY OF PROSPECT 138°45'A0"EDELAIDE HILLS COUNCI1L39°0'0"E Figure 20: CITY OF CHARLES STURT ADELAIDE HILLS Adelaide Encounter THE DC OF YORKE PENINSULA CITY OF WEST TORRENS Marine Park S S " " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 ° ° LGA Boundaries 5 5 3 CITY OF HOLDFAST BAY 3 Marino CP THE RURAL CITY Coobowie Bay AR THE CITY OF MARION Hallett Cove CP OF MURRAY Edithburgh Troubridge BRIDGE Island CP THE DC OF MOUNT BARKER Marine Parks Gulf View Road Lake - Perennial Port Lake - Intermittent Noarlunga Land Subject to Flooding (STF) Reef AR CITY OF ONKAPARINGA Troubridge Land Subject to Inundation (STI) Hill AR Parks and Reserves S Aldinga S " " Aquatic Reserves 0 0 ' Lower Yorke ' 5 Reef AR 5 1 1 ° Peninsula ° LGA Boundaries 5 5 3 3 Marine Park Coastline (median high water) Aldinga Scrub CP Coastal Waters of the State SELLICKS Major Road BEACH Minor Road ALEXANDRINA COUNCIL Normanville CITY OF S VICTOR HARBOR S " " 0 0 ' ' 0 YANKALILLA BAY 0 3 3 ° Wirrina Middleton ° 5 5 3 Second Valley 3 Victor Harbor COORONG DC POINT MARSDEN THE DC OF YANKALILLA ENCOUNTER BAY Coorong NP Newland BAY OF SHOALS Cape Jervis West Island - Deep Creek CP Head CP Encounter Bay AR Beatrice Islet CP NEWLAND Kingscote NEPEAN BAY HEAD CAVE BA 0 20 CK ST AIR S P KANGAROO HEAD AS Kms WESTERN COVE SA GE S S " " 0 0 ' Penneshaw ' 5 EASTERN 5 4 4 ° ° 5 COVE 5 3 The Pages CP 3 Lashmar CP ANTECHAMBER BAY KANGAROO ISLAND Pelican American Lagoon CP COUNCIL River AR CAPE WILLOUGHBY Lesueur CP Adelaide S S " " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 ° ° 6 6 3 3 Southern Produced by Coast and Marine Conservation Kangaroo Island Department for Environment and Heritage GPO BOX 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Marine Park www.marineparks.sa.gov.au Data Source Marine Parks, Parks and Reserves, Topographic Data - DEH Aquatic Reserves - PIRSA LGA Boundaries - DTEI Coastal Waters of the State - Geoscience Australia Compiled 16 August 2010 Projection Geographic Datum Geocentric Datum of Australia, 1994 © Copyright Department for Environment and Heritage 2010.
    [Show full text]