DOCSLIB.ORG

Download This Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download This Issue ALUMNI OPEN FACULTY AND REMEMBERING ISRAELI COLLEGE GRAD DIVERSITY WATERGATE PRINCETON ALUMNI WEEKLY EISGRUBER MOVES IN Our new president, Christopher L. Eisgruber ’83 OCTOBER 9, 2013 PAW.PRINCETON.EDU 00paw1009_CoverCLIPPING-NO BOX.indd 1 9/27/13 10:40 AM The Department of Art and Archaeology 2013-14 Lecture Series All lectures at 5:00PM Monday, October 7 Tuesday, February 25 106 McCormick Hall Wolfensohn Hall, IAS Martin Powers, University of Michigan Mark Haxthausen, Williams College Pictorial Citation in Song China: Paul Klee and the Problem of Style Theory and Practice Co-sponsored with Co-sponsored with the Institute for Advanced Study the Tang Center for East Asian Art Friday, March 7 Tuesday, October 15 106 McCormick Hall 106 McCormick Hall 2013-14 Graduate Student Symposium Daniel Abramson, Tufts University The Matter of Writing Obsolescence, History, and the 1:00-5:00PM Contradictions of Sustainability Tuesday, April 15 Wednesday, November 20 Wolfensohn Hall, IAS 101 McCormick Hall Aden Kumler, University of Chicago The James F. Haley ’50 Memorial Lecture Neither Breakthrough nor Breakdown: Salah Hassan, Cornell University Episodes from a History of Contemporary “Islamic” Art Medieval Abstraction after September 11 Co-sponsored with the Institute for Advanced Study Monday, December 9 Wolfensohn Hall, IAS Tuesday, April 22 Alexander Nagel, Institute of Fine Arts, 106 McCormick Hall New York University Margit Kern, University of Hamburg Orientations of Renaissance Art Constructions of Difference in the Spanish Co-sponsored with Painting of Siglo de Oro: the Institute for Advanced Study “Joseph’s Coat” and “Vulcan’s Forge” by Velazquez Tuesday, February 4 Wolfensohn Hall, IAS Briony Fer, University College London Malevich’s Nervous System Co-sponsored with the Institute for Advanced Study October 9, 2013 Volume 114, Number 2 An editorially independent magazine by alumni for alumni since 1900 PRESIDENT’S PAGE 2 Exhibition, INBOX 5 page 22 FROM THE EDITOR 7 ON THE CAMPUS 11 Opening Exercises features talk by new president The Class of 2017 College rankings Faculty, grad diversity Princeton Pre-read SPORTS: Sprint still) football Athletics director Gary Walters ’67 to retire (video ’14 LIFE OF THE MIND 21 Ellis Rahul Sagar on state secrets and leaks Is David Dobkin, Nicholas computer scientist and dean, also an artist? Faculty books (Bacevich); PRINCETONIANS 33 Jonathan Butler ’92 creates hot spots in Brooklyn Bacevich William Ruckelshaus ’55 Nancy on the “Saturday Night Massacre” New books 2017); and music by alumni of (Class CLASS NOTES 37 Eisgruber Takes Charge 24 In a Nation’s Service 28 MEMORIALS 56 Schaefer Princeton’s 20th president is settled in A new liberal-arts college is tailor-made CLASSIFIEDS 62 at One Nassau Hall. A look at the o ce’s for Israel, but the idea was born in Beverly new occupant. Princeton’s Stevenson Hall. THAT WAS THEN 64 By Mark F. Bernstein ’83 By Marilyn H. Marks *86 (Lange); PAW.PRINCETON.EDU Archives Digital Dupraz Larry Unconventional Art Declassifi ed ’17! ’17! ’17! Bridging a Chasm Market Dining View more images Columnist Gregg See how this year’s Andrew Bacevich *82’s Take a video tour (Exhibition); from Dean of the Lange ’70 re ects on freshmen stack up new book looks at how of Jonathan Butler Faculty David Dobkin’s the NSA by looking with numerical the American public ’92’s Brooklyn Murphy recent exhibit. back at Princeton’s compatriots from views the military. Smorgasburg. IDA protests. centuries past. Peter On the cover: Illustration by Piotr Lesniak. THE PRESIDENT’S PAGE Opening Exercises: Princeton’s Honor World At Opening Exercises on September 8, I enjoyed the address as president, to recognize that few if any of you privilege of making my first formal remarks as Princeton’s would remember anything that I said. But in fact I found president in welcoming the 1,286 members of the Class it rather liberating. It relieves me of any concern that my of 2017. I told the freshmen that I expect that we will advice might somehow lead you astray or compromise your always share a special bond, as we are embarking on our Princeton experience. What you won’t remember will not exciting new Princeton journeys together this fall. My help you, but it cannot harm you, either. address focused on encouraging the freshmen to reflect upon And, of course, I have done what professors traditionally questions about how to live life well, which are explored in do to reinforce their lectures. I have assigned you a book, the book I assigned in our inaugural “Pre-read” program, Anthony Appiah’s The Honor Code. I am hoping, above all, Professor Kwame Anthony Appiah’s The Honor Code: that you will remember the question that motivates Professor How Moral Revolutions Happen. Here is part of what I Appiah’s book — the question of what it means to live a told the Class of 2017. — C.L.E. successful human life. Professor Appiah believes, as do I, that living well has at least two parts to it: living a life that makes ne of the great joys of collegiate life is the sense you happy, and living a life that is of service to others. of renewal that comes each September, when There is an oft-quoted expression, attributed to both new undergraduates and graduate students the charismatic congresswoman Shirley Chisholm and the infuse the campus with fresh talent, energy, renowned activist Marian Wright Edelman, that “service Operspective, and enthusiasm. We know that the great Class is the rent we pay for living in this world.” I admire this of 2017 will enrich this University enormously, adding to sentiment — namely, that service will be part of any life Princeton’s lore and luster in ways that we can for now well-lived — but I worry that the formulation is misleading. scarcely imagine. We are excited to have you here. Describing “service” as “rent” makes it seem like a price And, truth be told, I think that my fellow administrators, that we pay for our happiness. You can do whatever makes faculty members, alumni, and trustees who are in you feel good, in other words, so long as you pay for it by attendance today would admit that not only are we donating time to others. excited to have you here, we also envy you. You are at the I suspect that is not what either Chisholm or Edelman beginning of a Princeton adventure that will challenge you, meant. They undoubtedly recognized that service, far from thrill you, and transform you. Unanticipated possibilities being a price that we pay for happiness, is the precondition await you, and most of you will later look back on the next for it. To find an activity truly fulfilling, you must both take four years as pleasure in it and feel a strong sense of connection between among the best it and a larger purpose for your life. in your life. You can achieve that connection in a wide variety of Most Princeton ways. Nearly any honest vocation will enable you to make APPLEWHITE alumni retain a contribution to the world if you do it right. What matters vivid images of is not so much which career you have but how you do it, DENISE their first days and how you do it matters a lot. on campus. One of the reasons that Princeton’s students and alumni Certainly that is so treasure their time on this campus is that they feel a so for me. Yet, for connection to a larger purpose while they are here. Over all the things that the years to come, you will find yourselves challenged, I do remember, I stimulated, and engaged, and you will also feel that you do not remember are doing something that matters — preparing yourself what the then- for the future, for your future, for important but as yet president of the unknown things to come. University, Bill Indeed, one of the great gifts of college life, and one of Bowen, said to us the defining insights of liberal arts education, is that you Addressing the Class of 2017 at Opening that week. In fact, can and must prepare for important things to come without Exercises. over the course knowing exactly what they are. You will inhabit a world, in of my academic this week and in the years to come, defined by possibilities career as a student, faculty member, and administrator, I that are almost unlimited. The person seated in front of you have heard a great many addresses by university presidents today, in this chapel, may turn out to be someone whom at formal academic gatherings, and I remember almost none you see only rarely, or someone who becomes one of the of them. closest friends of your lifetime. He or she may end up being As you might imagine, I reflected on that fact as I a pathbreaking scientist, a celebrated writer, a dedicated composed these remarks. You might think that it would be public servant, or an influential business leader. Their depressing to me, as I sat down to write my first ceremonial futures, and yours, are for now unwritten. THE ALUMNI WEEKLY PROVIDES THESE PAGES TO THE PRESIDENT ftu-20131009-1.3.indd 4 9/16/13 10:14 AM THE PRESIDENT’S PAGE Whether honor ennobles or ALIO degrades depends on the values and practices of your community DANIELLE — on the content of what Professor Appiah calls your honor world. When you arrived on this campus a few days ago, you became part of Princeton’s honor world, a community devoted to learning, to integrity, to being “in the nation’s service and in the service of all nations,” and to sustaining a warm and inclusive network that has its heart on this campus but extends across geography and time, binding together alumni of all generations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ian S. Lustick
    MIDDLE EAST POLICY, VOL. XV, NO. 3, FALL 2008 ABANDONING THE IRON WALL: ISRAEL AND “THE MIDDLE EASTERN MUCK” Ian S. Lustick Dr. Lustick is the Bess W. Heyman Chair of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania and the author of Trapped in the War on Terror. ionists arrived in Palestine in the the question of whether Israel and Israelis 1880s, and within several de- can remain in the Middle East without cades the movement’s leadership becoming part of it. Zrealized it faced a terrible pre- At first, Zionist settlers, land buyers, dicament. To create a permanent Jewish propagandists and emissaries negotiating political presence in the Middle East, with the Great Powers sought to avoid the Zionism needed peace. But day-to-day intractable and demoralizing subject of experience and their own nationalist Arab opposition to Zionism. Publicly, ideology gave Zionist leaders no reason to movement representatives promulgated expect Muslim Middle Easterners, and false images of Arab acceptance of especially the inhabitants of Palestine, to Zionism or of Palestinian Arab opportuni- greet the building of the Jewish National ties to secure a better life thanks to the Home with anything but intransigent and creation of the Jewish National Home. violent opposition. The solution to this Privately, they recognized the unbridgeable predicament was the Iron Wall — the gulf between their image of the country’s systematic but calibrated use of force to future and the images and interests of the teach Arabs that Israel, the Jewish “state- overwhelming majority of its inhabitants.1 on-the-way,” was ineradicable, regardless With no solution of their own to the “Arab of whether it was perceived by them to be problem,” they demanded that Britain and just.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Replies: on Revelation, Natural Law and Jewish Autonomy in Theology1
    Three Replies: On Revelation, Natural Law and Jewish Autonomy in Theology1 Yoram Hazony The Herzl Institute, Jerusalem Abstract: I address three key questions in Jewish theology that have come up in readers’ criticism of my book The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture: (i) How should we think about God’s revelation to man if, as I have proposed, the sharp distinction between divine revelation and human reason is alien to the Hebrew Bible and classical rabbinic sources? (ii) Is the biblical Law of Moses intended to be a description of natural law, suggesting the path to life and the good for all nations? And (iii) what should be the role of the Jewish theologian, given the overwhelming prevalence of Christian conceptions of God and Scripture in contemporary theological discourse. I am grateful to Christina Brinks, Randal Rauser, Samuel Lebens and Jessica Wilson for devoting so much careful thought to my book The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture in their respective essays in the Journal of Analytic Theology last year.2 These papers raise many important issues. In this essay, I will focus on three questions that I see as key for contemporary philosophy and theology, leaving other pertinent aspects of their papers for another time. I. Hebrew Scripture Without the Revelation-Reason Dichotomy In The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture, I propose that our ability to recognize the intended teachings, and even the subject matter, of the ancient Jewish works collected in the biblical corpus has been severely damaged by the prevalence of the analytic distinction between “works of human reason” and “works of revelation.”3 Historically, the distinction between reason and revelation has played an especially 1 I would like to thank readers who commented on this paper, in whole or in part, offering useful suggestions and criticism: Joshua Berman, Lenn Goodman, Yael Hazony, Dru Johnson, Joseph Isaac Lifshitz, Alan Mittleman, Robert Nicholson, David Novak, Randal Rauser, Michael Rea, Moshe Shoshan, Gil Student, and Joshua Weinstein.
    [Show full text]
  • Architect Joseph Klarwein Was the Winner of the 1957 Contest for Planning the Knesset Building on Givat Ram
    Handout 1 Knesset Architect Joseph Klarwein was the winner of the 1957 contest for planning the Knesset building on Givat Ram. His initial proposal presented at the contest was ultimately very different than the building that was inaugurated on August 30th 1966. In fact, it was influenced by different architects that were involved in different parts of the planning and construction throughout its nine years, and among them were architect Dov Carmi and his son Ram. In textbooks written on the Knesset building, it is claimed that the planners intended to build a construction similar to the Greek Acropolis. Those who worked on the building programs before the contest had very little idea on how they wanted the building to look, and the result – an architectural mixture – surprisingly resembled the building of the United States’ embassy in Athens. The embassy was designed by the renowned Bauhaus architect Walter Gropius, which was later considered as a specimen of the “International Style.” Klarwein’s original model was comprised of a rectangular construction with 20 columns on its front and back, 15 columns on each side, and two internal yards on the eastern and western sides of the plenum hall found at the center of the building. The entrance to the building was to be on its northern front. The constructed building was square, with 10 columns on all sides, and with no internal yards; the plenum is not at its center, but on its eastern part; and west to the plenum hall there is a reception hall. This hall is named “Chagall State Hall,” as it is decorated with art created by the Russian-born Jewish artist, Marc Chagall.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00317-0 - The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture Yoram Hazony Frontmatter More information The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture What if the Hebrew Bible wasn’t meant to be read as “revelation”? What if it’s not really about miracles or the afterlife, but about how to lead our lives in this world? The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture proposes a new framework for reading the Bible. It shows how the biblical authors used narrative and prophetic oratory to advance universal arguments about ethics, political philosophy, and metaphysics. It offers bold new studies of the biblical narratives and prophetic poetry, transforming forever our understanding of what the stories of Abel, Abraham, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, and David and the speeches of Isaiah and Jeremiah were meant to teach. The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture assumes no belief in God or other religious commitment. It assumes no previous background in Bible. It is free of disciplinary jargon. Open the door to a book you never knew existed. You’ll never read the Bible the same way again. Yoram Hazony is Provost of the Shalem Center in Jerusalem and a Senior Fellow in the Department of Philosophy, Political Theory and Religion (PPR). Hazony’s previous books include The Jewish State: The Struggle for Israel’s Soul and The Dawn: Political Teachings of the Book of Esther. His essays and articles have appeared in the New York Times, the New Republic, Commentary, Azure, and Ha’aretz, among other publications. He is author of a regular blog on philosophy, Judaism, Israel, and higher education called Jerusalem Letters.
    [Show full text]
  • I USA Community Colleges, STEM Learning Ecosystems and Their
    I USA Community Colleges, STEM Learning Ecosystems and Their Role in STEM For the Nation…How does this inform the Israel Technical Colleges and the New STEM Ecosystems? Jan Morrison, Founder and Senior Partner, TIES 26 March 2020 1500 -1930 WHAT IS STEM? WHAT ISN’T STEM? FIRST 10 YEARS! STEM It’s a fundamental opportunity to solve our world’s most STEM Is A Mindset grand challenges! It’s a fundamental opportunity to be competent to create, design and implement innovative tools! It’s Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, Design Thinking/Literacy, Computational Thinking/Literacy, Digital Arts, Agriculture and Areas Not Currently Known! Success is linked to the Measurement of What Works and Why! STEM FOR ALL BUT DESIGNED FOR EACH STEM for ALL is Aligned with Workforce! STEM HAPPENS EVERYWHERE!! © 2016 Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM INFORMAL FORMAL HOME © 2017 Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM © 2017 Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM BUSINESS/INDUSTRY COLLABORATION IS NOT A NATURAL ACT… ENLIGHTENED SELF-INTEREST IS!!! STEM SUPPORTS A REDESIGN OF TEACHING AND LEARNING AT ALL GRADE LEVELS What About… 1890’S ELLIOTT REPORT Nanobiotechnology? BIOLOGY Genetic Engineering? Bioinformatics? CHEMISTRY Aquaponics? Biophysical Engineering? PHYSICS STEM IS NEW TOOLS, NEW SKILLS ALL DRIVEN BY 21ST CENTURY SKILLS Not Just Hands-On but Solving REAL Problems CAPSTONE PROJECTS TO SOLVE ISRAEL’S GRANDEST CHALLENGES WHAT IS A STEM ECOSYSTEM AND WHY IS IT NEEDED? Unprecedented Global Competition Shanghai - Singapore 1987 1965
    [Show full text]
  • Yoram Hazony Jerusalem and Carthage
    Yoram Hazony Jerusalem and Carthage Abstract: In recent years, Tertullian’s iconic distinction between Jerusalem and Athens has been frequently cited as a point of departure for discussion of the relationship between the thought of the Bible and the philosophy of ancient Greece. Historically, Tertullian’s dichotomy launches a discourse based on two familiar premises: that “faith” and “reason” name distinct and opposed aspects of mankind’s intellectual endowment; and that the tradition of thought found in the Bible represents and encourages the first of these, whereas Greek philosophy embraces the second. My own view is that both of these premises are almost certainly false. In what follows, I offer preliminary remarks concern- ing one aspect of this topic, which is the question of whether the Bible can reasonably be seen as representing the position labeled “faith” in the Tertullianic disputation between faith and reason. In my view, the kind of faith that bears the label “Jerusalem” in the discourse inspired by Tertullian cannot be found in the Hebrew Bible at all. To speak intelligently about the thought of the Hebrew Bible and its place in the history of the West, one must learn to think in terms of an unaccustomed and very different opposi- tion, that between Jerusalem and Carthage. 1. Introduction: What Has Tertullian to Do with Jerusalem? In recent years, Tertullian’s iconic distinction between Jerusalem and Athens has been frequently cited as a point of departure for discussion of the relationship between the thought of the Bible and the philosophy of ancient Greece.1 Historically, Tertullian’s dichotomy launches a dis- course based on two familiar premises, by now often presented as if they I would like to thank Leora Batnitzky, Joshua Berman, Gerald Blidstein, Steven Grosby, Ofir Haivry, Jonathan Jacobs, Menachem Kellner, Joseph Isaac Lifshitz, Stewart Moore, Gordon Schochet, and Joshua Weinstein for their comments on earlier versions of this talk.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise History of a Nation Reborn by Daniel Gordis
    Passages NOW Book Club Reading and Discussion Guide Israel: A Concise History of a Nation Reborn By Daniel Gordis Spring Semester 2017 Reading guide developed by The Philos Project A human life, I think, should be well rooted in some spot of a native land, where it may get the love of tender kinship for the face of earth, for the labors men go forth to, for the sounds and accents that haunt it, for whatever will give that early home a familiar unmistakable difference amidst the future widening of knowledge… a spot where the definiteness of early memories may be inwrought with affection. -- George Eliot, Daniel Deronda ​ Introduction The year 2017 is one of momentous anniversaries for the Jewish State of Israel. In 1917, British Lord Arthur Balfour penned a letter declaring his support for the creation of a Jewish state in the British Mandate territory of Palestine, laying the political foundation for the establishment of the modern state of Israel. In 1967, Israel defended its existence from the amassed armies of its neighbors in the Six Day War. This year marks the centennial of the Balfour Declaration, and the half centennial of that war. As such, this spring semester is an excellent time to reacquaint ourselves with the providential history of Israel’s founding and preservation. To this end, Passages and The Philos Project thought it appropriate to read and study the first eight chapters of Daniel Gordis’ book Israel: A ​ Concise History of A Nation Reborn. The following guide will assist in this endeavor. ​ About the book’s author Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoover Digest
    HOOVER DIGEST RESEARCH + OPINION ON PUBLIC POLICY WINTER 2019 NO. 1 THE HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace was established at Stanford University in 1919 by Herbert Hoover, a member of Stanford’s pioneer graduating class of 1895 and the thirty-first president of the United States. Created as a library and repository of documents, the Institution approaches its centennial with a dual identity: an active public policy research center and an internationally recognized library and archives. The Institution’s overarching goals are to: » Understand the causes and consequences of economic, political, and social change » Analyze the effects of government actions and public policies » Use reasoned argument and intellectual rigor to generate ideas that nurture the formation of public policy and benefit society Herbert Hoover’s 1959 statement to the Board of Trustees of Stanford University continues to guide and define the Institution’s mission in the twenty-first century: This Institution supports the Constitution of the United States, its Bill of Rights, and its method of representative government. Both our social and economic sys- tems are based on private enterprise, from which springs initiative and ingenuity. Ours is a system where the Federal Government should undertake no govern- mental, social, or economic action, except where local government, or the people, cannot undertake it for themselves. The overall mission of this Institution is, from its records, to recall the voice of experience against the making of war, and by the study of these records and their publication to recall man’s endeavors to make and preserve peace, and to sustain for America the safeguards of the American way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Jon D. Levenson Contents
    CURRICULUM VITAE Jon D. Levenson Contents: Personal and Educational pp. 1–2 Areas of Specialization p. 2 Foreign Study p. 2 Prizes and Commendations p. 2–3 Teaching Experience pp. 3 Professional Societies p. 3–4 Offices Held pp. 4 Consulting Experience p. 4 Publications pp. 4–16 Academic Presentations pp. 17–28 Other Presentations pp. 28–40 Education: Ph.D. Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University, 1975 M.A. Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University, 1974 B.A. summa cum laude in English, Harvard College, 1971 Areas of Specialization: Theological traditions in ancient Israel (biblical and rabbinic periods) Literary Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible Midrash History of Jewish biblical interpretation Modern Jewish theology Jewish-Christian relations Foreign Study: One year of research in Jerusalem, Israel, on a full-salary grant from Wellesley College, 1980–81 Modern Hebrew language and culture at Ulpan Akiva, Netanya, Israel, summer 1971. Granted certificate from the Ministry of Education and Culture Italian language and art at the Centro di Cultura per Stranieri, University of Florence, Italy, summer 1968 Jon D. Levenson, CV Prizes and Commendations: Listed as one of “The Top 100 People Positively Influencing Jewish Life, 2015,” by the Algemeiner Journal. Listing by Choice of Inheriting Abraham: The Legacy of the Patriarch in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as one of the Outstanding Academic Titles, 2013. Honorable Mention for the PROSE Award in Theology and Religious Studies, Association of American Publishers (for Resurrection: The Power of God for Christians and Jews, co-authored with Kevin J. Madigan), 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 2010 Soref Symposium and 25Th Anniversary Celebration
    Proceedings of the 2010 Soref Symposium and 25th Anniversary Celebration April 21–22, 2010 Proceedings of the 2010 Soref Symposium and 25th Anniversary Celebration April 21–22, 2010 The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20036 (202) 452-0650 All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2010 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy Published in 2010 in the United States of America by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20036. Design by Daniel Kohan, Sensical Design and Communication Photography by Stan Barouh Editor’s Note This volume contains the on-the-record portion of The Washington Institute’s 25th Anniversary Celebration and 2010 Soref Symposium. Speaker and panelist remarks are presented as edited transcriptions and may be cited as such. Complete audio and video of these presentations is available at www.washingtoninstitute.org. Table of Contents Preface vii Robert Satloff Executive director, The Washington Institute Speaker Biographies ix Michael Stein Address on U.S. Middle East Policy 3 Gen. (Ret.) James L. Jones National security advisor The Obama Administration and the Middle East: Setting Priorities, Taking Action 15 Thomas Friedman Foreign affairs columnist, New York Times Martin Kramer Wexler-Fromer fellow, The Washington Institute William Kristol Editor, Weekly Standard David Makovsky Ziegler distinguished fellow, The Washington Institute Preface In 1985, a small group of visionary Americans committed to advancing U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Ally My Journey Across the American-Israeli Divide
    ALLY MY JOURNEY ACROSS THE AMERICAN-ISRAELI DIVIDE 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Michael B Oren | 9780812986426 | | | | | Ally My Journey Across the American-Israeli Divide 1st edition PDF Book This was a fun book to read. Nov 06, Eitan Levy rated it it was amazing. On the Israeli domestic side, the Carmel forest fire was a threat to Haifa and was finally controlled, this time with American aid. Seller Inventory U02B Seller Inventory 1-B As Oren relates this proved to be very difficult with a new President who had his own agenda for the Middle East. Too often, he says one thing and does another, he does not support his allies, he betrays his friends and reneges on promises, he exacts retribution for perceived slights; as the adult in the room, he has very thin skin. For the United States, its funding of the Iron Dome weapons system to protect Israel from Hamas rockets was enough support, and it refused to condemn Hamas even when it used human shields to protect its launch sites. It was Israel building a wall that prevented them from worshipping in Jerusalem. I won't spoil it, but I'm surprised he didn't change the book title while he was at it. And a member of the Sioux nation has a right to live on Sioux- nation territory. You can do with it—I would like to request you withdraw it. We hear so much about fake news and fake science these days, but you see it here on steroids. Jul 03, Steven Z.
    [Show full text]
  • "Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran
    Forward.com Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran Forward Staff | Fri. Feb 02, 2007 While Jewish communal leaders focus most of their current lobbying efforts on pressing the United States to take a tough line against Iran and its nuclear program, some are privately voicing fears that they will be accused of driving America into a war with the regime in Tehran. In early advocacy efforts on the issue, Jewish organizations stressed the threat that a nuclear Iran would pose to Israel in light of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s calls to “wipe Israel off the map.” Now, with concerns mounting that Israel and its supporters might be blamed for any military confrontation, Jewish groups are seeking to widen their argument, asserting that an Iranian nuclear bomb would threaten the West and endanger pro-American Sunni Muslim states in the region. Jess Hordes, Washington director of the Anti-Defamation League, said that the strategy of broadening the case against Iran was not an attempt to divert attention from the threats to Israel. “It is a fact that Iran is a danger to the whole world,” Hordes said. “We are not just saying it to hide our concerns about Israel.” Yet many advocacy efforts, even when not linked to Israel, carry indelibly Jewish fingerprints. Last week, Jewish groups claimed victory when the United Nations approved a resolution denouncing Holocaust denial, with Iran’s regime as the obvious target. Additionally, numerous Jewish activists are pressing in advertisements and Internet appeals for Ahmadinejad to be indicted in The Hague for incitement to genocide. In warning of possible scapegoating, insiders point to the experience of the Iraq War.
    [Show full text]