DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Unpublished Primary Sources Lancaster County Historical Society, Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Lancaster County Deed Books. (microfilm) Lancaster County Will Books. (microfilm) Maryland State Archives, Annapolis. Cecil County Circuit Court, Land Records. MDLandRec.Net. (digital collection) http://mdlandrec.net (accessed October 2008 to February 2009). North Carolina Department of Archives and History, Raleigh. Buffalo Presbyterian Church, Greensboro, North Carolina. Session Minutes and Records, Volume 1, June 8, 1768–April 2, 1796. (microfilm) English Records. Granville District. Papers from the Marquis of Bath‘s Library in Longleat, Warminster, Wilshire, England, 1729–1780. (microfilm) Guilford County Estate Records. Guilford County Record of Deeds. Guilford County Record of Wills. Guilford County Wills, 1771–1968. North Carolina Supreme Court Cases. Orange County Minutes of the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions. Orange County Record of Deeds. Rowan County Estate Records. Rowan County Minutes of the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions. 147 Rowan County Record of Deeds. Rowan County Record of Wills. Rowan County Wills, 1743–1971. Secretary of State Record Group. Granville Proprietary Land Office: Land Entries, Warrants, and Plats of Survey. Pennsylvania State Archives, Harrisburg. RG-17, Records of the Land Office, Warrant Registers, 1733–1957. Presbyterian Historical Society, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Biographical Vertical Files (RG414). Congregation Vertical Files (RG425). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. North Carolina Collection. North Carolina Maps. (digital collection) http://www.dc.lib.unc.edu (accessed January 5, 2009). Southern Historical Collection. Rankin, Samuel Meek (1864–1939) Genealogical Papers. Published and Edited Primary Sources Abstracts of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, Wills, 1732–1785. Westminster, Md.: Willow Bend Books, 2000. Bailey, Elizabeth ―Pat‖ Shaw. Guilford County, North Carolina, Land Grants, 1778– 1934. Signal Mountain, Tenn.: Mountain Press, 1993. Blagg, Thomas M., ed. Indexes to Irish Wills. Vol. 5. London: Phillimore and Co., 1920. 148 Browning, Mary A., ed. Guilford County Cemeteries, Volume II, Eastern Section. Greensboro, N. C.: Guilford County Genealogical Society, 1993. Burns, Annie Walker. North Carolina Pension Abstracts of Soldiers of the Revolutionary War: War of 1812 and Indian Wars. Vol. 9. Washington, D. C.: Annie Walker Burns, n.d. Cain, Robert J., ed. Records of the Executive Council, 1735–1754. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives and History, 1988. Clark, Raymond B., Jr. Index to Cecil County, Maryland, Wills, 1674–1777. Arlington, Va.: Raymond Clark, Jr., 1981. Donnell, Raymond Dufau, ed. Buffalo Presbyterian Church and Cemetery, Greensboro, North Carolina. Greensboro, N.C.: Guilford County Genealogical Society, 1996. Eustace, P. Beryl, ed. Registry of Deeds Dublin: Abstract of Wills, Vol. I, 1708–1745. Dublin: Stationary Office, 1956. Fries, Adelaide L. Fries, ed. Records of the Moravians in North Carolina. 2 vols. 1922– 25. Reprint, Raleigh: State Department of Archives and History, 1968. Hawbaker, Gary T., ed. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, Quarter Sessions Abstracts (1729–1742): Book 1. Hershey, Penn.: Gary T. Hawbaker, 1986. Hawbaker, Gary T. and Clyde L. Groff. A New Index, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, before the Federal Census: Volume 3, Index to the 1750 Tax Records. Hershey, Penn.: Gary T. Hawbaker, 1982. Hill, Jane Smith. An Annotated Digest of Will Book A, Guilford County, North Carolina, 1771–May Court 1816.Winston-Salem, N.C.: Mrs. Jane Smith Hill, 2005. 149 Hinshaw, William Wade. Encyclopedia of American Quaker Genealogy. Vol. 1. 1936. Reprint, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1969. ———. Encyclopedia of American Quaker Genealogy. Vol. 6. 1950. Reprint, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1973. Hofmann, Margaret M. Colony of North Carolina 1735–1764: Abstracts of Land Patent. Vol. 1. Weldon, N.C.: Roanoke News Co., 1982. ———. The Granville District of North Carolina, 1748–1763: Abstracts of Land Grants. 4 vols. Weldon, N.C.: Roanoke News Co., 1986. Holcomb, Brent H., ed. Marriages of Rowan County, North Carolina: 1753–1868. Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1986. Linn, Jo White, ed. Abstracts of the Deeds of Rowan County, North Carolina, 1753– 1785. 10 vols. Salisbury, N.C.: Linn, 1983. ———, ed. Abstracts of the Minutes of the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions, Rowan County, North Carolina. 2 vols. Salisbury, N.C.: Linn, 1977–79. ———, ed. Rowan County, North Carolina, Tax Lists 1757–1800: Annotated Transcriptions. [Salisbury, N.C.]: Linn, 1995. ———, ed. Rowan County, North Carolina, Will Abstracts, Vol. 1, 1753–1805: Abstracts of Books A–F. Salisbury, N.C.: Linn, 1970. MacInnes, Sharon Cook, and Angus MacInnes. Early Landowners of Pennsylvania: Atlas of Township Warrantee Maps of Lancaster County, PA. Apollo, Pa.: Closson Press, 2008. 150 Mayhill, R. Thomas, comp. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, Deed Abstracts and Revolutionary War Oaths of Allegiance: Deed Books “A” through “M,” 1729 through ca1770. Rev. and Enlarged ed. Knightstown, Ind.: The Bookmark, 1973. Mitchell, Thornton W. North Carolina Wills: A Testator Index, 1665–1900. Corrected and revised ed. Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1992. North Carolina. Laws of North Carolina. New Bern, N.C.: Printed by James Davis, 1755. Patton, Robert J., Jr., comp. Little Britain Presbyterian Church Cemetery, Fulton Township, Lancaster Co., PA. N.p.: Robert J. Patton, Jr., 2001. Records of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, 1706–1788. 1904. Reprint, New York: Arno Press & The New York Times, 1969. Robertson, Donna J., comp. Tombstone Inscription of West Nottingham Cemetery, Cecil County, Maryland. N.p., 1995 Saunders, William L., ed. The Colonial Records of North Carolina. 10 vols. Raleigh: Josephus Daniels, 1890. Shields, Ruth Herndon, comp. Abstracts of the Minutes of the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions of Orange County in the Province of North Carolina, September 1752 through August 1766. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Ruth Herndon Shields, [1965?]. Thompson, Ruth F. and Louise J. Hartgrove, ed. Abstracts of the Marriage Bonds & Additional Data Guilford County, North Carolina. 2 vols. Greensboro, N.C.: Guilford County Genealogical Society, 1995. U. S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Guilford County, North Carolina. 1977. 151 U. S. Geographical Survey. ―Greensboro Topographical Map,‖ http://www.trails.com (accessed June 8, 2009.). Vicars, Arthur, ed. Index to the Prerogative Wills of Ireland, 1536–1810. Dublin: Edward Ponsonby, 1897. Webster, Irene B., comp. Guilford County, North Carolina, Will Abstracts, 1771–1841. N.p., 1979. Secondary Works Albers, Terry. ―Meacham, Vinson, Whitt, Rankin, Albers & Extended families,‖ http://wc.rootsweb.com.ancestry.com (accessed October 4, 2008). Allcott, John V. Colonial Homes in North Carolina. Raleigh, N.C.: Carolina Charter Tercentenary Commission, 1963. Arnett, Ethel Stephens. Greensboro, North Carolina: The County Seat of Guilford. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1955. Bailyn, Bernard. The Peopling of North America: An Introduction. New York: Knopf, 1987. ———. Voyagers to the West: A Passage in the Peopling of America on the Eve of the Revolution. New York: Knopf, 1986. Bassett, John S. ―The Regulators of North Carolina (1765–1771).‖ Chap. 11 in Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1894. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1895. 152 Beeman, Richard R. The Evolution of the Southern Backcountry: A Case Study of Lunenburg County, Virginia, 1746–1832. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1984. Bell, Robert. The Book of Ulster Surnames. Belfast: Blackstaff Press, 1998. Bishop, Cindy. ―Bishop/Fentress Families,‖ http://rootsweb.com (accessed October 7, 2008). Blagg, Karen. ―J&N Blagg‘s Roots,‖ http://rootsweb.com (accessed October 7, 2008). Blair, Lucy Echels, comp. John Blair of Guilford County, North Carolina and Some of His Descendants. Lamesa, Tex., 1979. Blethen, H. Tyler and Curtis W. Wood, Jr. From Ulster to Carolina: The Migration of the Scotch-Irish to Southwestern North Carolina. Revised ed. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives and History, 1998. ———, ed. Ulster and North America: Transatlantic Perspectives on the Scotch-Irish. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1997. Bolton, Charles Knowles. Scotch Irish Pioneers in Ulster and America. Boston: Bacon & Brown, 1910. Bowles, David. Spring House. 2 vols. The Westward Sagas. San Antonio, Tex.: Plum Creek Press, 2006. Brawley, James S. The Rowan Story, 1753–1953: A Narrative History of Rowan County, North Carolina. Salisbury, N.C.: Rowan Printing Co., 1953. 153 Bricknell, John. The Natural History of North-Carolina. With an Account of the Trade, Manners, and Customs, of the Christian and Indian Inhabitants. Strange Beasts, Birds, Fishes, Snakes, Insects, Trees, and Plants, &c. Illustrated with Copper Plates. Dublin, 1743. Brooks, Aubrey Lee. ―David Caldwell and His Log College.‖ North Carolina Historical Review 28, no. 4 (1951): 399–407. Brown, Katharine L. New Providence Church, 1746–1996: A History. Raphine, Va.: New Providence Presbyterian Church, 1996. Buchanan, John. The Road to Guilford Courthouse: The American Revolution in the Carolinas. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997. Buchanan, Tom. ―The Buchanan Family Database‖ http://awt.ancestry.com (accessed July 16, 2007).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Brief History of the Granville District and Land Grants
    Appendix C: A Brief History of the Granville District and Land Grants Before 1729, the British kings repeatedly granted territory in the American colonies to individuals or small groups. Most of the territory that was to become the Carolinas, Georgia and part of Florida was originally granted by King Charles II to repay a political debt to a group of eight of his supporters who would be known as the Lords Proprietors, investing them not only with property but also with gubernatorial authority to administer it. The Province of Carolina1 was a proprietary colony from 1663 to 1729. Most of the Lords Proprietors began granting land in the Carolinas in 1669, but, unfortunately, most of the land records for the proprietary period have been lost. Indirect rule by the Lords Proprietors eventually fell out of favor as the English Sovereigns sought to concentrate their power and authority, and the colonies were converted to crown colonies, governed by officials appointed by the King. In 1729, seven of the eight heirs to the original Lords Proprietors sold their proprietary shares back to King George II, and North Carolina became a royal colony. The eighth share belonged to John Carteret,2 who refused to sell his share to the crown. Carteret’s share consisted of holdings in what are now North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. In 1742, the king's Privy Council agreed to Carteret's request to exchange these holdings for a continuous area in North Carolina. The northern boundary was to be the Virginia- North Carolina border (36° 30')—the only boundary in the entire province that had been fixed— and the southern line at 35° 34'.
    [Show full text]
  • Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina James Matthew Am C Donald Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Politics of the personal in the old north state: Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina James Matthew aM c Donald Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Mac Donald, James Matthew, "Politics of the personal in the old north state: Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3625. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3625 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. POLITICS OF THE PERSONAL IN THE OLD NORTH STATE: GRIFFITH RUTHERFORD IN REVOLUTIONARY NORTH CAROLINA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of History By James M. Mac Donald B.A., University of Delaware, 1995 M.A., Appalachian State University, 1997 May, 2006 To My Parents ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my committee for their support and suggestions during the writing of my dissertation. As a student, I had the good fortune of taking seminars with each member beginning with my first graduate class at LSU. Mark Thompson became director late in the course of the project and generously agreed to chair the committee during the last semester.
    [Show full text]
  • The John Allen House and Tryon's Palace: Icons of the North Carolina
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY The John Allen House and Tryon’s Palace: Icons of the North Carolina Regulator Movement A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By H. Gilbert Bradshaw LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA 2020 Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: “A Well-Documented Picture of North Carolina History” ..................................... 1 Chapter 2: “Valley of Humility Between Two Mountains of Conceit” ................................. 28 Chapter 3: “The Growing Weight of Oppression Which We Lye Under” ............................ 48 Chapter 4: “Great Elegance in Taste and Workmanship” ...................................................... 70 Chapter 5: “We Have Until Very Recently Neglected Our Historical Sites” ....................... 101 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 133 ii “For there are deeds that should not pass away, And names that must not wither.” – Plaque in St. Philip’s Church Brunswick Town, North Carolina iii Abstract A defining feature of North Carolina is her geography. English colonists who founded the first settlements in the east adapted their old lifestyles to their new environs, and as a result, a burgeoning planter and merchant class emerged throughout the Tidewater and coastal regions. This eastern gentry replicated the customs, manners,
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1974 The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas Richard George Remer College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Remer, Richard George, "The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas" (1974). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624870. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-w0y7-0655 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GREAT WAGON ROAD OF THE CAROLIRAS A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Richard George Reiner 1974 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts HcUU 'Author Approved, August 1974 / f ? > O Q Richard Maxwell Brown . - „ v Edward M. Riley/ James Thompson sos^s TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................... iv LIST OF M A P S ........................................... v ABSTRACT ............................................... vi INTRODUCTION ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Royal Governors of North Carolina, 1729-1775 / by Blackwell P. Robinson
    fig?- Z\ftV% Morth .Carolina Stafe Library (L * Raleigh The Five Royal Governors of North Carolina 17294775 By Blackwell P. Robinson, Ph. D. Professor of History Woman's College of the University of North Carolina A Publication of The Carolina Charter Tercentenary Commission Box 1881, Raleigh, North Carolina 1963 The Five Royal Governors of North Carolina 17294775 By Blackwell P. Robinson, Ph. D. Professor of History Woman's College of the University of North Carolina A Publication of The Carolina Charter Tercentenary Commission Box 1881, Raleigh, North Carolina 1963 THE CAROLINA CHARTER TERCENTENARY COMMISSION Hon. Francis E. Winslow, Chairman Henry Belk Mrs. Kauno A. Lehto Mrs. Doris Betts James G. W. MacLamroc Dr. Chalmers G. Davidson Mrs. Harry McMullan Mrs. Everett L. Durham Dr. Paul Murray William C. Fields Dan M. Paul William Carrington Gretter, Jr. Dr. Robert H. Spiro, Jr. Grayson Harding David Stick Mrs. James M. Harper, Jr. J. P. Strother Mrs. Ernest L. Ives Mrs. J. O. Tally, Jr. Dr. Henry W. Jordan Rt. Rev. Thomas H. Wright Ex-Officio Dr. Charles F. Carroll, Robert L. Stallings, Superintendent of Director, Department of Public Instruction Conservation and Development Dr. Christopher Crittenden Director, Department of Archives and History, Secretary The Carolina Charter Tercentenary Commission was established by the North Carolina General Assembly to "make plans and develop a program for celebration of the tercentenary of the granting of the ." Carolina Charter of 1663 . As part of this program the Com- mission arranged for the publication of a number of historical pamphlets for use in stimulating interest in the study of North Carolina history during the period 1663-1763.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 “Base and Unworthy Men”
    ABSTRACT STROUD, JASON MICHAEL. Partial Views and Private Interest: Corruption and Rhetoric in Colonial North Carolina, 1754-1760. (Under the direction of Holly Brewer.) Under the governorship of Arthur Dobbs (r.1754-1763) colonial North Carolina witnessed a number of serious political debates that culminated in an effort by opposition political leaders to unseat the governor. This thesis examines the role of political corruption, both as a practice and a discourse, in these debates. It argues that the rhetoric of corruption was largely driven by anxieties about the ability of corrupt practices, especially patronage, to cement political ties among the colony‟s elites on the one hand and to enable the governor to fill the colony‟s posts with pliant factors on the other. These anxieties stemmed from both eighteenth century political thought and realities in North Carolina, a society largely held together by personal connections. Three political events are considered—Arthur Dobbs‟s removal of James Murray and John Rutherford from the executive council, the dispute over a Parliamentary grant to the colony, and civic disturbances in the Granville District. Most studies of these disputes have focused on Arthur Dobbs‟s attempts to crush the political factions that assembled in opposition to his leadership and the exercise of royal prerogative in the colony. By emphasizing the intensely personal political environment of colonial North Carolina, this thesis argues that the discourse of political corruption used in these political contests was used by both the governor and his adversaries in support of and in opposition to executive power. It further argues that corrupt practice and discourse were severely destabilizing forces in colonial North Carolina, and contrasts the rhetoric of mid-century politics with that used by the Regulators against corruption more than a decade later.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Considerable Tumult in the Streets:” People, Papers, and Perspectives in the North Carolina Regulation
    BROOMALL, JAMES JOSEPH. M.A. “Making a Considerable Tumult In The Streets:” People, Papers, and Perspectives in the North Carolina Regulation. (2006) Directed by Dr. Lisa C. Tolbert This thesis examines the construction of knowledge and identity revealed through the perspectives and acts of the participants in, opponents to, and observers of the North Carolina Regulation. By so doing, this work penetrates the elusive worldviews and mindsets of eighteenth-century colonists, especially those living in the North Carolina backcountry. Documentary sources—including heretofore-neglected newspapers—serve as the foundational source material; a consideration of townscapes and landscapes is included also to illustrate their roles in the Regulation. Through this inquiry my thesis examines broadly the cultural mechanisms used by Regulators to construct and propel their protest against tyranny and corruption; intertwined with these issues are matters of representation and exchanges of power in this complex agrarian protest. Such a focus is designed to expand upon the existing literature on this subject, which generally examines the causes and roots of this struggle. “MAKING A CONSIDERABLE TUMULT IN THE STREETS:” PEOPLE, PAPERS, AND PERSPECITIVES IN THE NORTH CAROLINA REGULATION by James Joseph Broomall A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Greensboro 2006 Approved by _________________________ Committee Chair In Memoriam Maurice S. Whitlock ii APPROVAL PAGE This thesis has been approved by the following committee of the Faculty of the Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kettle Creek Battlefield Survey
    Stirring Up a Hornet’s Nest: The Kettle Creek Battlefield Survey LAMAR Institute Publication Series Report Number 131 The LAMAR Institute, Inc. Stirring Up a Hornet’s Nest: The Kettle Creek Battlefield Survey LAMAR Institute Publication Series, Report Number 131 Submitted to City of Washington P.O. Box 9 Washington, Georgia 30673 Submitted by Daniel T. Elliott, Principal Investigator and Author The LAMAR Institute, Inc. P.O. Box 2992 Savannah, GA 31402 2009 TableB of Contents Table of Contents i List of Figures iiH List of Tables vH Acknowledgements vi I. Introduction 1 Battle Summary 1 Project Environment 2 II. Research Methods 4 Archival Research 4 Fieldwork 12 Laboratory Analysis 15 Reporting 16 Curation 16 III. Previous Research 17 Previous Historical Research 17 Previous Archeological Research 36 IV. The Participants 37 Patriot Militia 37 Biographies of Selected Patriot Participants 45 Other Patriots Linked to Kettle Creek 76 Loyalist Militia 80 Selected Loyalist Participants 81 Troop Strength and Casualty Estimates 95 V. The Battlefield 97 Battlefield Imagery 97 Military Landscape of Wilkes County 100 Property Ownership and Kettle Creek 112 Landscape Modifications 124 VI. Archeological Results 127 Battlefield Landscape 127 Activity Loci 132 Material Culture 137 VI. Summary and Recommendations 160 Executive Summary 160 Battle Analysis 160 Recommendations 166 References Cited 170 Appendix I. Artifact Inventory, Kettle Creek Battlefield Survey, 2008 196 Appendix II. Kettle Creek Roster 210 i ListB of Figures Figure 1. Kettle Creek Battlefield Location Map. ......................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Kettle Creek Battlefield Study Area (U.S.G.S. 1991)................................................................... 13 Figure 3. View of Project Area, Facing North from Monument Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes About Scotch-Irish and German Settlers in Virginia and the Carolinas
    Notes about Scotch-Irish and German Settlers in Virginia and the Carolinas Copyright © 2000–2009 by William Lee Anderson III. All rights reserved. Scotch-Irish and German Settlers in Virginia and the Carolinas Introduction During the 1700s many Scotch-Irish and German immigrants arrived in America. They and their children settled parts of Pennsylvania, Virginia, and the Carolinas. Today, most of their descendants never think about their heritage. Most live in the present, are working on real-life problems, or planning their future. That attitude was shared by their ancestor immigrants 250 years ago. Nonetheless, I suspect most descendants have at least wondered what the word Scotch-Irish means. All my life, I have heard various facts, but never understood how they fit together. Some facts appeared contradictory. So, I investigated, and discovered a colorful story that far exceeded my expectations. My principal objectives were to: Understand certain comments made by grandparents and other relatives over 40 years ago. Understand the confusing adjective Scotch-Irish. Understand the confusing cultural icons of bagpipes, kilts, Celtic whistles, etc. Understand the history of Moravian, Lutheran, Mennonite, Amish, Dunkards, Presbyterian, Puritanism, Huguenot, Quaker, Methodist, Congregational, and Baptist denominations that have churches in the Carolinas. Understand why and when surnames became common. Understand ancestor Margaret Moore‘s recollections of the Siege of Londonderry in 1689. Understand motivations of Scotch-Irish and German immigrants during the 1700s and terms of their Carolina land grants. Understand relations between early Carolina immigrants and Native Americans. Understand why Scotland‘s heroine Flora Macdonald came to live in North Carolina in 1774.
    [Show full text]
  • Protest and Place in the North Carolina Regulation
    Journal of Backcountry Studies Author’s Note: This article originated from work conducted while writing my Master’s thesis at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro in 2006. The author would, therefore, like to acknowledge committee members Dr. Lisa Tolbert, Dr. Phyllis Hunter, and Dr. Robert Calhoon for their support and suggestion. In addition, Dr. William Link, Tish Wiggs, Christopher Graham, and Roger Smith provided extensive commentary. My sincerest thanks to all of the above without whom this work would not have been possible. “Making a considerable Tumult in the Streets”: Protest and Place in the North Carolina Regulation BY JAMES J. BROOMALL Shouting throngs of protesters broke Hillsborough, North Carolina’s normal calm in the final days of September 1770. On Tuesday the twenty-fifth, a band of more than one hundred North Carolina Regulators gathered around the area of King Street near the center of town. The group quickly descended upon the mansion house of Edmund Fanning, a prominent political figure accused of corruption by the Regulators. As tensions mounted the sounds of shattering glass and splintered wood were heard echoing through the air. Using axes and other instruments, the large crowd broke into the home and began emptying its contents. The surrounding lawn and packed-dirt street filled with broken furniture, articles of clothing, scattered papers, and empty bottles. After Fanning’s possessions were either destroyed or carried away, the Regulators turned their attention to the building itself. Once again using their axes and assorted implements, they “pulled down and laid…in ruins” the structure.1 In this moment of magnitude, the Regulators’ cries of protest against malfeasance transformed into a defiant act of violence, which turned the private home of Edmund Fanning into the center of a public protest.
    [Show full text]
  • Perpetuities and the Genius of a Free State Joshua C
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 67 Article 11 Issue 6 Issue 6 - November 2014 11-2014 Perpetuities and the Genius of a Free State Joshua C. Tate Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Estates and Trusts Commons Recommended Citation Joshua C. Tate, Perpetuities and the Genius of a Free State, 67 Vanderbilt Law Review 1823 (2014) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol67/iss6/11 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Perpetuities and the Genius of a Free State Joshua C. Tate* Commentary on Steven J. Horowitz & Robert H. Sitkoff, UnconstitutionalPerpetual Trusts' I. INTRODUCTION ................................... 1823 II. POLITICS AND SOCIETY IN COLONIAL NORTH CAROLINA... 1825 A. The Lords Proprietors ................. 1825 B. The Granville District ................ ..... 1826 C. Violence and Revolution .................... 1828 III. PERPETUITIES AND THE NORTH CAROLINA CONSTITUTION OF 1776 . .................................... ..... 1830 IV. CONCLUSION ........................................ 1833 I. INTRODUCTION Legal history, like all history, is inevitably a speculative affair. No one can be sure what the editors of Justinian's Digest might have excised from long-lost works of classical Roman law; nor can one know for certain what went through the minds of certain justices of the U.S. Supreme Court in the mid-twentieth century when they formed and reformed their views on Roosevelt's New Deal. Of course, scholars can try to chip away at this uncertainty: great progress can be made through educated guesses and learned theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Development in the Colonial Backcountry: Virginia and North Carolina
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1991 Town development in the colonial backcountry: Virginia and North Carolina Christopher E. Hendricks College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Geography Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hendricks, Christopher E., "Town development in the colonial backcountry: Virginia and North Carolina" (1991). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623814. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-vj48-3605 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]