DOCSLIB.ORG

AQUIFERPROTECTIONAREA SW Illington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AQUIFERPROTECTIONAREA SW Illington S O t Hydeville Upper Pond e l e d p d 9 M 1 d G R Roaring Brook R o r e ge u t d n e u d Le t p H d t s o R n e L p o o R y m r e U d T d z ia y R n t D co o e R D d e R n v Stickney Hill Brook Gulf Brook r P k a i d l r l r e a Copse Pond d Nipmuck Pond 4 l R Szych R New Pond 8 d R Bigelow Brook C d I Union Elementary School d S Taitro Pond Riverside Pond cr n Sunset Ridge Rd an ! Pl d to d Reily M d R n R n B ult a R r ra y th w o t f r ro d o Te lo o k N B R L R w Res No 3 n d Br ld y a e adwa Scranton Brook r R y Rd O e c n k H y k K e i h c r l Fox R i e l un p t R R r m S u Rd d d n h p ait L AQUIFER PRO TECTIO N AREAS M r b al G R w Kent Hollow Dam d e Orcutts Pond i ille Rd v ffordv H Sta y P d a a k m t R te S n Res No 2 p n o d R d t e O n n a K d a Bald Hill Brook r i R k Johnson Memorial Hospital R n W illington, CO NNECTICUT S c n r n t S d t a i d i e c S R y F H Chestnut Mountain lm P D g k Myers Pond ! t a l tt R e n H e s on d p e o a R Sun Valley Lake d D n S y ll E l L r o il H w rw F Exit 73 oo i p o l p C l Bush Meadow Brook R hi t x ro Hedgehog Hill R d Walker Pond W Orcutts G S o W lle Rd k Orcuttvi H e d a d d e R i r S b O ou l l R t e l s e C o d l 9 31 D f t d 9 ou f e R 1 n r 190 S 3 r t a S y t R V y d R p d w G d d r H o S U N I O N i o Bald Hill n e 19 d R g t e ta S Exit 73 l V l l fi S l R B e d Roaring Brook a ld a LEGEND Diamond Ledge Brook d H Kinney Pond R r R r West Stafford Brook n r d o Stafford High School l l r w i D w o D H n s s T ! Stafford Middle School a n d R l C e h a m n d e d a v stn R s ! o d u B r A t o u Le ve l A Aquife r Prote ction Are a (Final Ad op te d ) H f Cedar Swamp Brook h il taf l West Stafford S R S e T d c Glenville Pond Walker Mountain Borough Elementary n a u n V Forestville Pond R r L l K n a u r 2 h R ! t F 3 d D n i v Le ve l A Aquife r Prote ction Are a (Final) West Pond r y e Bald Pond West Stafford School r L Old B e ar Edson Brook w rows R D v F d i S y H u o C le R r Sturtevants Pond e n u o d t Cemetery Brook e a t a l o r a h t c S T A F F O R D d p d Cedar Swamp Swift B e R S R e d i 9 Le ve l B Aquife r Prote ction Are a (Pre lim inary) M n r H d 1 L M o c Airport Cemetery Pond o C y s a d o C F McIntyres Brook l ll l e m n w o t i R t l o Warren Pond e s Re ed a e e ! R Rd li H w d h n l l Morey Pond i l R a P o e R d t 2 n W s o a d t Forest Pond d i d n O Foster Pond n R o S t d R ll N i e Baker Brook m t R d M v R d w R y a bb S d S A A Exit 72 Lead Mine Hill n t d c d Pinneys Pond o i r R t C S o l p f il n o n f o a m n a H r p i t y c l Furnace Brook e u t Res No 1 S w Duker Pond r S o d S O Q n L d R Y n o S t l o l a Crystal Lake Brook w i S l t e t e H g e S n d Hande S R l R v d E t w a A d e s o 30 d Rice Rd t C s n S e n V d r d o r o M n S p e R d Rhode Island Ponds e d R D R a W e r k te r r v a s R L d e u B B S n a Lead Mine Brook n i u i r n n n G c o e l Hopyard Brook e k d Exit 72 i Rd o R l D e k o d k e R lsi d d S Cyril Dam y M il C H a n E H w Rd L a t t St w w n ki d o c n pe y k s l o ros t e o o a d P a i t an Sustek Pond C S J B S a R v n e t S G n t a i a O r L s a te e r t t a l y D S o M H F o r Middle River h w e d w l Bradway Pond C g y l i d W H 1 R C 9 C Snow Hill M P 4 h S 0 i S n e i e u t l g l R d t a R d r a C c f t d R oope Park St Springs Dam S f r h Palizari Pond Ln pr Stafford Springs o n Westford Airstrip d in r o S g d r n F t S o t Westford A S Airport P ve t r e y C !o e H a lu Brandy Brook Charter Brothers Brook b Bruce Pond t Sky Hill o w R ve d A E g p d nd lla x d S y a To Earl M Witt Intermediate Shady Brook r t a W R p r B o d n e d Dadalt r d u ! St B R r s uc a h Dennis Pond R s D t ne r d f k R d t n o Rockwell Hill d a r c c D L d R r e e n l d a r l R e il Stoughton Brook Armitage Pond t v a a P d a r l R e d r A H w h r a d R a D d b o c Boston Hollow Road Brook S e e i l n r l h C o g o p a e l d c t r R M u r W V g B i u se s u n a B 140 i o t l a L H SV l i d e d l n R 32 Dennis Pond o R d t S W S O V y d t EX PLANATIO N Lake View Terrace R Lily Bridge Pond n Rd r F Arnold Ponds u er e or B oy t es o O B d r t D C o r N l d R a ip d w r m l h l r u O T e D C c e k o s t d J S Union Dr e Murry Hill t w D a e a l R t d n M e s r n r i t n Tolland Hill F S r s n r R D i H R s R e n o t e i ck t r w 1 y The Aquife r Prote ction Program , ad m iniste re d b y the sp e cific, d e taile d m od e ling of the ground wate r flow h f Village Hill o e d d Devils Hopyard Swamp e ll Dr r t e Ashford e R Jimmy Ledges d m t d r l r a r r O o R t R o R Lake Chaffee a a E A S T F O R D L N C W c e l u h hi te n g k l d H O d d i a Willimantic River a k r a d C D P Conne cticut De p artm e nt of Ene rgy & Environm e ntal syste m at the we ll fie ld .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report
    Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report Summer 2018 Volume 47 The Thames River watershed includes the Five Mile, French, Moosup, Natchaug, Pachaug, Quinebaug, Shetucket, Willimantic, and Yantic Rivers and all their tributaries. We’re not just the "Thames main stem." Greetings from the Thames River Basin Partnership. Once again this quarter our partners have proven their ability to work cooperatively on projects compatible with the TRBP Workplan and in support of our common mission statement to share organizational resources and to develop a regional approach to natural resource protection. I hope you enjoy reading about these activities as much as I enjoy sharing information about them with you. For more information on any of these updates, just click on the blue website hyperlinks in this e-publication, but be sure to come back to finish reading the rest of the report. Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District And TRBP Coordinator Special Presentation If you missed the July 2018 meeting of the Thames River Basin Partnership, then you missed a presentation by Chuck Toal, Avalonia Land Conservancy’s development and programs director. Chuck gave a presentation on the 50 years of accomplishments of ALC as a regional land trust. ALC is focused on 22 towns in southeastern Connecticut. ALC, which oversees 4000 acres of preserved land, achieved accreditation in 2017. Their success has resulted from a working board of directors and the establishment of town committees to focus on smaller areas. Their current focus is to be more selective on land acquisition, particularly concentrating on building blocks of open space while also building an endowment fund land stewardship going forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Strea
    Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Streambed Sediment in the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins, 1992-94 By Robert F. Breault and Sandra L. Harris Abstract exceed sediment-quality guidelines over a wider geographical area, although usually by lower Streambed-sediment samples were collected ratios of contaminant concentration to sediment- in 1992-94 at selected sites in the Connecticut, quality guideline than the organic compounds. Housatonic, and Thames River Basins to determine the geographical distribution of trace elements and organic compounds and their INTRODUCTION potential for adverse biological effects on aquatic organisms. Chromium, copper, lead, mercury, The Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins study unit is one of 59 National Water-Quality nickel, zinc, chlordane, DDT, PAHs, and PCBs Assessment (NAWQA) study units nationwide. The were detected in samples from throughout the study unit drainage basin comprises an area of almost basins, but concentrations of these constituents 16,000 mi2 and extends through parts of the Province of generally were lowest in the northern forested Quebec, Canada, eastern Vermont, western New Hamp- drainage basins and highest in the southern shire, west-central Massachusetts, nearly all of Connect- urbanized drainage basins of Springfield, icut, and small parts of New York and Rhode Island. Massachusetts, and Hartford, New Haven and The study unit is entirely within the New Bridgeport, Connecticut. Possible anthropogenic England Physiographic Province (Fenneman, 1938), a sources of these contaminants include industrial plateau-like upland that rises gradually from the sea but effluent; municipal wastewater; runoff from includes numerous mountain ranges and individual agricultural, urban and forested areas; and peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report
    Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report Summer 2019 Volume 51 The Thames River watershed includes the Five Mile, French, Moosup, Natchaug, Pachaug, Quinebaug, Shetucket, Willimantic, and Yantic Rivers and all their tributaries. We’re not just the "Thames main stem." Greetings from the Thames River Basin Partnership. Once again this quarter our partners have proven their ability to work cooperatively on projects compatible with the TRBP Plan of Work and in support of our common mission statement to share organizational resources and to develop a regional approach to natural resource protection. I hope you enjoy reading about these activities as much as I enjoy sharing information about them with you. For more information on any of these updates, just click on the blue website hyperlinks in this e-publication, but be sure to come back to finish reading the rest of the report. Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District And TRBP Coordinator Special Presentation If you did not attend the summer TRBP meeting, besides the great view of Long Island Sound from the CT Sea Grant Conference Room, you also missed a presentation given by Connecticut State Conservationist, Tom Morgart of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Tom provided an overview of the changes in the Farm Bill that Congress enacted in 2018. The Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQIP) cap remains at $450,000 through 2023. Farmers that have met the cap under the 2014 farm bill will be reset to zero and be eligible for funding again under the 2018 Farm Bill.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station Resources 5-1975 An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, "An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut" (1975). Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station. 50. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes/50 Bulletin 435, May '975 3 7 An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut Edited by Richard L. Hames Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection STORRS AGRICULTURA L EXPERIMENT STATION COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RE SOURCES THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, ST ORRS. CONNECTICUT 06268 • EDITOR'S FOREWORD The Thames River system is located in a section of southern New England that has escaped the extreme alterations of the industrial revolution and later urbanization. It has, unfortunately, suffered the consequences of dam construction causing the disappearance of anadromous fish, and industrial and domestic pollution which degraded water quality in some areas to a marginal fisheries habitat. Enough unspoiled areas are left, unaltered by dams, pollution and the developer, to reward the knowledgeable observer with a glimpse of what it was and what it could be again. As part of the program for restoration of anadromous fish to the Thames River system, it was decided to make a general biological survey of the system to document present conditions .
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Regulations and Boat Launches
    to boating in Connecticut! TheWelcome map with local ordinances, state boat launches, pumpout facilities, and Boating Infrastructure Grant funded transient facilities is back again. New this year is an alphabetical list of state boat launches located on Connecticut lakes, ponds, and rivers listed by the waterbody name. If you’re exploring a familiar waterbody or starting a new adventure, be sure to have the proper safety equipment by checking the list on page 32 or requesting a Vessel Safety Check by boating staff (see page 14 for additional information). Reference Reference Reference Name Town Number Name Town Number Name Town Number Amos Lake Preston P12 Dog Pond Goshen G2 Lake Zoar Southbury S9 Anderson Pond North Stonington N23 Dooley Pond Middletown M11 Lantern Hill Ledyard L2 Avery Pond Preston P13 Eagleville Lake Coventry C23 Leonard Pond Kent K3 Babcock Pond Colchester C13 East River Guilford G26 Lieutenant River Old Lyme O3 Baldwin Bridge Old Saybrook O6 Four Mile River Old Lyme O1 Lighthouse Point New Haven N7 Ball Pond New Fairfield N4 Gardner Lake Salem S1 Little Pond Thompson T1 Bantam Lake Morris M19 Glasgo Pond Griswold G11 Long Pond North Stonington N27 Barn Island Stonington S17 Gorton Pond East Lyme E9 Mamanasco Lake Ridgefield R2 Bashan Lake East Haddam E1 Grand Street East Lyme E13 Mansfield Hollow Lake Mansfield M3 Batterson Park Pond New Britain N2 Great Island Old Lyme O2 Mashapaug Lake Union U3 Bayberry Lane Groton G14 Green Falls Reservoir Voluntown V5 Messerschmidt Pond Westbrook W10 Beach Pond Voluntown V3 Guilford
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources
    2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources In The Spotlight Updated Launch & Pumpout Directories CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION HTTPS://PORTAL.CT.GOV/DEEP/BOATING/BOATING-AND-PADDLING YOUR FULL SERVICE YACHTING DESTINATION No Bridges, Direct Access New State of the Art Concrete Floating Fuel Dock Offering Diesel/Gas to Long Island Sound Docks for Vessels up to 250’ www.bridgeportharbormarina.com | 203-330-8787 BRIDGEPORT BOATWORKS 200 Ton Full Service Boatyard: Travel Lift Repair, Refit, Refurbish www.bridgeportboatworks.com | 860-536-9651 BOCA OYSTER BAR Stunning Water Views Professional Lunch & New England Fare 2 Courses - $14 www.bocaoysterbar.com | 203-612-4848 NOW OPEN 10 E Main Street - 1st Floor • Bridgeport CT 06608 [email protected] • 203-330-8787 • VHF CH 09 2 2021 Connecticut BOATERS GUIDE We Take Nervous Out of Breakdowns $159* for Unlimited Towing...JOIN TODAY! With an Unlimited Towing Membership, breakdowns, running out GET THE APP IT’S THE of fuel and soft ungroundings don’t have to be so stressful. For a FASTEST WAY TO GET A TOW year of worry-free boating, make TowBoatU.S. your backup plan. BoatUS.com/Towing or800-395-2628 *One year Saltwater Membership pricing. Details of services provided can be found online at BoatUS.com/Agree. TowBoatU.S. is not a rescue service. In an emergency situation, you must contact the Coast Guard or a government agency immediately. 2021 Connecticut BOATER’S GUIDE 2021 Connecticut A digest of boating laws and regulations Boater's Guide Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Rules and Resources State of Connecticut Boating Division Ned Lamont, Governor Peter B.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 95.38 KB, for 2007 Environmental Monitoring Summary
    2007 DWM ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OVERVIEW (CN 278.0) Water quality monitoring, assessment and management activities of the MassDEP are sequentially performed in accordance with a rotating five-year watershed schedule. Surface waters are typically monitored during Year 2 of the cycle by the Division of Watershed Management’s (DWM) Watershed Planning Section. The main programmatic objectives of the DWM related to surface water quality monitoring are to: Collect chemical, physical and biological data to assess the degree to which designated uses, such as primary and secondary contact recreation, fish consumption, aquatic life and aesthetics, are being met in waters of the Commonwealth; Collect chemical, physical and biological data to support analysis and development of implementation plans to reduce pollutant loads to waters of the Commonwealth; Screen fish in selected waterbodies for fish tissue contaminants (metals, PCBs and organochlorine pesticides) to provide for public health risk assessment; To the extent feasible, locate pollution sources and promote and facilitate timely correction; Over the long term, collect water quality data to enable the determination of trends in parameter concentrations and/or loads; Develop new or revised standards, which may require short-term research monitoring directed towards the establishment or revision of water quality policies and standards; and to Measure the effectiveness of water quality management projects or programs (such as the effectiveness of implementing TMDLs, Best Management Practices (BMP) for the control of nonpoint pollution, or a state-wide policy or permitting program). Quality assurance is maintained for DWM’s watershed monitoring program to ensure implementation of an effective and efficient sampling design, to meet programmatic goals and to provide data meeting specific data quality objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • New Wellfield Along the Willimantic River
    10.0 EVALUATION OF NEW WELLFIELD(S) ALONG THE WILLIMANTIC RIVER 10.1 ASSESSMENT OF FEASIBILITY Unlike an interconnection with an established supply source, the development of a new groundwater source cannot be evaluated with respect to existing available water. Instead, the ability to develop a particular yield from a new groundwater source is dependent upon available historical information from borings, monitoring wells, and site-specific studies. This data has been complied for each of four potential wellfields along the Willimantic River, two near Mansfield Depot (MD-1 and MD-3) and two near Eagleville Preserve (EP-4 and EP-5). Included in this assessment is recent work undertaken by the Town of Mansfield to analyze a number of potential groundwater sources along the Willimantic River. As summary of locations follows: Alternative #6A is potential wellfield MD-1, located on private property south of Route 44. Most of this property is currently used for agriculture. Alternative #6B is potential wellfield MD-3 located in River Park. The site is owned by the Town of Mansfield and is currently used for recreation. Alternative #6C is potential wellfield EP-4, located in the State-owned northern portion of Eagleville Preserve. This area is currently forested wetland. Alternative #6D is potential wellfield EP-5, located in the southern portion of Eagleville Preserve owned by the Town of Mansfield. 10.1.1 POTENTIAL WELLFIELDS NEAR MANSFIELD DEPOT (MD-1 & MD-3) A number of historic and more recent publications have analyzed potential groundwater aquifers in the Mansfield Depot area. These are briefly summarized below.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Natchaug River Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan
    Upper Natchaug River Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District Project 15-03 is funded in part by a US EPA Clean Water Act § 319 NPS grant through the CT DEEP What do we mean by upper Natchaug? • The Natchaug Watershed is ~175 square miles. • ECCD documented pollution sources completed a watershed based plan for the lower 10 square miles Natchaug watershed in 2014. • Previously, EPA Clean Water Act funds were only available to clean up pollution from non- point sources. • Upper Natchaug Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan may allow federal funds to be used for pollution prevention in the future. Natchaug CAP Re-CAP Holly Drinkuth The Nature Conservancy Why the Upper Natchaug was selected for the first Healthy Watershed Plan in CT Eric Thomas, Watershed Manager CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection What are we trying to accomplish • In partnership with CT DEEP, ECCD will identify (map) where the streams, lakes and ponds are not polluted and share this information with the municipalities. • ECCD will identify and recommend cost-effective methods to protect those high quality waters and watershed services they provide to the local communities. • With guidance from the Stakeholders, ECCD will develop and conduct a community outreach campaign to build an increased awareness regarding the natural ecosystem services and long-term benefits of healthy watersheds for resilient communities. • The final Natchaug River Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan will enhance the capacity (Towns, heath districts, COGs and others) to support the healthy watershed planning process (including reduced drinking water treatment and infrastructure costs).
    [Show full text]
  • Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report
    Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report Spring 2020 Volume 54 The Thames River watershed includes the Five Mile, French, Moosup, Natchaug, Pachaug, Quinebaug, Shetucket, Willimantic, and Yantic Rivers and all their tributaries. We’re not just the "Thames main stem." Greetings from the Thames River Basin Partnership. Once again this quarter our partners have proven their ability to work cooperatively on projects compatible with the TRBP Plan of Work and in support of our common mission statement to share organizational resources and to develop a regional approach to natural resource protection. I hope you enjoy reading about these activities as much as I enjoy sharing information about them with you. For more information on any of these updates, just click on the blue website hyperlinks in this e-publication, but be sure to come back to finish reading the rest of the report. Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District And TRBP Coordinator Special Presentation If you missed the Spring TRBP meeting, you missed a presentation given by Brian Hall and Hunter Brawley, GIS consultants hired by The Last Green Valley to update the protected land database in an online mapping format. Their presentation, entitled Exploring Landscape Scale, Regional Conservation Priorities included a demonstration on The Northeast Initiative Mapper. This online map is available at https://harvard- cga.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=86b89989f5674809b311a61eab027b44. The TLGV-led project was completed in cooperation with the Connecticut Land Conservation Council and multiple area land trusts which provided updated information on land they have worked so hard to conserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Watersheds
    Percent Impervious Surface Summaries for Watersheds CONNECTICUT WATERSHEDS Name Number Acres 1985 %IS 1990 %IS 1995 %IS 2002 %IS ABBEY BROOK 4204 4,927.62 2.32 2.64 2.76 3.02 ALLYN BROOK 4605 3,506.46 2.99 3.30 3.50 3.96 ANDRUS BROOK 6003 1,373.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.09 ANGUILLA BROOK 2101 7,891.33 3.13 3.50 3.78 4.29 ASH CREEK 7106 9,813.00 34.15 35.49 36.34 37.47 ASHAWAY RIVER 1003 3,283.88 3.89 4.17 4.41 4.96 ASPETUCK RIVER 7202 14,754.18 2.97 3.17 3.31 3.61 BALL POND BROOK 6402 4,850.50 3.98 4.67 4.87 5.10 BANTAM RIVER 6705 25,732.28 2.22 2.40 2.46 2.55 BARTLETT BROOK 3902 5,956.12 1.31 1.41 1.45 1.49 BASS BROOK 4401 6,659.35 19.10 20.97 21.72 22.77 BEACON HILL BROOK 6918 6,537.60 4.24 5.18 5.46 6.14 BEAVER BROOK 3802 5,008.24 1.13 1.22 1.24 1.27 BEAVER BROOK 3804 7,252.67 2.18 2.38 2.52 2.67 BEAVER BROOK 4803 5,343.77 0.88 0.93 0.94 0.95 BEAVER POND BROOK 6913 3,572.59 16.11 19.23 20.76 21.79 BELCHER BROOK 4601 5,305.22 6.74 8.05 8.39 9.36 BIGELOW BROOK 3203 18,734.99 1.40 1.46 1.51 1.54 BILLINGS BROOK 3605 3,790.12 1.33 1.48 1.51 1.56 BLACK HALL RIVER 4021 3,532.28 3.47 3.82 4.04 4.26 BLACKBERRY RIVER 6100 17,341.03 2.51 2.73 2.83 3.00 BLACKLEDGE RIVER 4707 16,680.11 2.82 3.02 3.16 3.34 BLACKWELL BROOK 3711 18,011.26 1.53 1.65 1.70 1.77 BLADENS RIVER 6919 6,874.43 4.70 5.57 5.79 6.32 BOG HOLLOW BROOK 6014 4,189.36 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.51 BOGGS POND BROOK 6602 4,184.91 7.22 7.78 8.41 8.89 BOOTH HILL BROOK 7104 3,257.81 8.54 9.36 10.02 10.55 BRANCH BROOK 6910 14,494.87 2.05 2.34 2.39 2.48 BRANFORD RIVER 5111 15,586.31 8.03 8.94 9.33 9.74
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Statewide Riffle Bioassessment by Volunteers Report
    CT DEEP Riffle Bioassessment by Volunteers Program 2015 RBV Program Annual Summary Report (Report #17) www.ct.gov/deep/rbv Table of Contents Acknowledgements................................................................................................................ 1 RBV: The ‘Treasure Hunt’ for CT’s Healthiest Streams! ............................................................ 2 2015 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 3 2015 Participation Summary .................................................................................................. 4 Table 1. Annual RBV Program Participation Statistics 2010-2015 .................................................. 4 Figure 1. RBV Participation Map ..................................................................................................... 5 2015 Monitoring Results ........................................................................................................ 6 Table 2. Annual RBV Program Monitoring Location Statistics 2010-2015 ...................................... 6 Table 3. Summary of 2015 RBV Voucher Contents by RBV Category .............................................. 6 Figure 2. 2015 RBV Results Map ...................................................................................................... 7 Table 4. Frequency of RBV Types in 2015 Vouchers ........................................................................ 8 Table 5. Detailed 2015 RBV Station Results ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]