Most Residential Uses of CCA Wood to Be Replaced 1 Most Residential Uses of CCA Wood to Be Replaced on February 12, 2002, the U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Most Residential Uses of CCA Wood to Be Replaced 1 Most Residential Uses of CCA Wood to Be Replaced on February 12, 2002, the U.S March 2002 Volume 14, No. 2 Most Residential Uses of CCA Wood to Be Replaced 1 Most Residential Uses of CCA Wood to be Replaced On February 12, 2002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced a voluntary decision by industry to move consumer use of treated-lumber products away 2 What’s the Weather Like? from a variety of pressure-treated wood that contains arsenic by December 31, 2003, in favor of new, alternative wood preservatives. This change affects essentially all residential uses of wood treated with chromated copper arsenate, also known as CCA. This is the wood commonly used in play structures, decks, picnic tables, landscaping timbers, 3 Pesticide Registration: “Section What?” residential fencing, patios, and walkways/boardwalks. By January 2004, USEPA will not allow CCA products for any of these residential uses. This decision will assist the volun- tary transition in both manufacturing and retail areas to new, alternative wood preserva- Dealer Training Manual 4 tives that do not contain arsenic. Although USEPA staff have not concluded that these Available products pose unreasonable risk to the public, they do believe that any reduction in exposure to arsenic is desirable. This action comes years ahead of completing USEPA’s 4 D&R Training Manual regulatory and scientific assessment of CCA and will substantially reduce potential expo- Available sure to CCA. 5 Consumer Pesticide Q&A Regarding CCA Transition Process Hotline Changes Name What uses of CCA-treated wood are affected by this transition? After December 31, 2003, wood treaters will not be able to use CCA for wood intended for decks, picnic tables, New Central Hotline for 5 landscaping timbers, gazebos, residential fencing, patios, walkways/boardwalks, and play U.S. Poison Control structures. Wood treated before this date, however, can still be used in residential settings. Centers Already-built structures containing CCA-treated wood are not affected by this action. 5 Pesticide Clean Sweep What uses of CCA-treated wood will be allowed? Effective December 31, 2003, CCA Update may be used for preservative treatment of the following categories of forest products and in accordance with the respective cited standard (noted parenthetically) of the 2001 edition of the American Wood Preservers’ Association Standards: lumber and timber for Empty Pesticide Container 5 saltwater use only (C2); piles (C3); poles (C4); plywood (C9); wood for highway con- Recycling Update struction (C14); poles, piles, and posts used as structural members on farms and plywood used on farms (C16); wood for marine construction (C18); round poles and posts used in 6 Pesticide Update building construction (C23); sawn timber used to support residential and commercial structures (C24); sawn crossarms (C25); structural glued, laminated members and laminations before gluing (C28); structural composite lumber (C33); and shakes and shingles (C34). University of Illinois • U.S. Department of Agriculture Local Extension Councils Cooperating University of Illinois Extension provides equal opportunities in programs and employment. Illinois Pesticide Review Volume 14, No. 2, March 2002 2 Forest products treated with this reduce the amount of CCA that Alternatively, if you know who built the product may be sold or distributed only leaches from treated wood. deck, you may want to call and ask. for uses within the AWPA Commodity • When conducting new construction What alternatives to CCA-treated Standards under which the treatment or repairs, consider the range of wood will be available? A number of occurred. alternatives to CCA-treated wood. preservatives have been registered by Why are the manufacturers phasing out These alternatives include both non- USEPA, and wood treated with these CCA? Industry has indicated that it is arsenical chemical wood preserva- preservatives is expected to be available in making a business decision based on tives and other wood and nonwood the marketplace. In addition, untreated market demand to move to other types of materials. Consult your local home- wood (for example, cedar and redwood) wood preservatives that do not contain improvement store for more infor- and nonwood alternatives—such as arsenic. Although the action is voluntary, mation. plastics, metal, and composite materi- it effectively changes the labels for CCA. Should I replace my CCA-treated deck als—are available. Your local hardware This means that it will be unlawful to use or play set? EPA does not recommend store or lumberyard can provide more CCA to treat wood intended for residen- that consumers replace or remove existing information about available alternatives. tial uses after December 31, 2003. Stocks structures made with CCA-treated wood How will the voluntary transition of CCA-treated wood remaining in stores or the soil surrounding those structures. away from CCA affect USEPA’s risk after this date, however, can be sold. Concerned citizens may want to take assessment for residential use of CCA- Does CCA-treated wood present any extra precautions, however, by applying a treated wood? Throughout this process, health risks? USEPA has not concluded coating to exposed surfaces regularly. USEPA has continued working on our that CCA-treated wood poses any unrea- What types of coatings are most effec- risk assessment. The transition away from sonable risk to the public or the environ- tive? Although available data are very CCA will be one of several important ment. Nevertheless, arsenic is a known limited, some studies suggest that apply- factors considered in determining the human carcinogen; and, thus, USEPA ing certain penetrating coatings (for next steps in the comprehensive assess- believes that any reduction in the levels of example, oil-based, semitransparent ment of CCA. Through the risk- potential exposure to arsenic is desirable. stains) on a regular basis (for example, assessment process to date, USEPA has USEPA believes that the voluntary transi- once a year or every other year, depend- received extensive recommendations from tion to nonarsenical wood preservatives ing upon wear and weathering) may the Scientific Advisory Panel, a group of for residential sites is a responsible action reduce migration of wood-preservative scientific experts, on the best approach to by the registrants. chemicals from CCA-treated wood. In evaluating potential risks to children from What steps can be taken to reduce a selecting a finish, consumers should be exposure to decks and play structures family’s potential exposure to CCA? aware that, in some cases, “film-forming” (visit www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/2001/ Minimize unnecessary exposure to CCA: or nonpenetrating stains (latex semi- index.htm to see the report). USEPA has also received many comments from the • Never burn treated wood in open transparent, latex opaque, and oil-based opaque stains) on outdoor surfaces such public, stakeholders, industry, and public fires, stoves, fireplaces, or residential interest groups. As these comments and boilers. as decks and fences are not recom- mended, as subsequent peeling and recommendations are considered, USEPA • Always wash hands thoroughly after flaking may ultimately have an impact will evaluate how the manufacturer’s contact with any wood, especially on durability, as well as exposure to pre- recent action affects the timing and scope before eating and drinking. servatives in the wood. Talk with your of the risk assessment. (Phil Nixon, adapted from USEPA releases) • Never let food come into direct local hardware store about available contact with any treated wood. coatings. • Always follow the precautions How can I tell if my deck has been What’s the outlined in USEPA’s “Consumer constructed with CCA-treated wood? Safety Information Sheet” before Freshly treated wood, if not coated, has a Weather Like? working with CCA-treated wood. greenish tint, which fades over time. As a practical matter, CCA has been the prin- Additional measures that may be taken There’s a joke that says people used to cipal chemical used to treat wood for include the following: find out what the weather was like by decks and other outdoor uses around the looking out the window, but now they • Apply a coating product to pressure- home. Generally, if your deck was not need cable TV or a computer. OK, so it’s treated wood on a regular basis. made with redwood or cedar, then most a funny commentary on our technology- Some studies suggest that this can likely the deck is CCA-treated wood. Illinois Pesticide Review Volume 14, No. 2 March 2002 3 focused world, but is it ridiculous? In the invaluable for this. Compasses are useful, a state to provide registration for addi- case of pesticide application, it’s probably too, especially for defending against a tional uses of federally registered pesti- not. drift complaint. A wind heading of “20 cides for distribution and use within that Granted, you don’t need an Internet to 30 degrees” is more informative and state to meet “special local needs.” Such connection to decide to spray, but know- useful as a defense than ambiguous terms registrations are referred to as state labels, ing the weather, particularly the wind like “northeast” or “north–northeast.” It special local needs, or 24(c) registrations conditions, during the application is criti- may be good to record temperature or and are considered as federal registrations cal for drift control. Accurately recording relative humidity also. Some pesticides that authorize distribution and use only that information is critical, too. The cur- have maximum temperatures for use. If within the granting state. Such registra- rent atmosphere of mistrust surrounding the label says don’t spray if the tempera- tions are subject to all provisions of pesticide applications makes it increas- ture is over 85 degrees, recording the FIFRA that apply to currently registered ingly likely that if drift occurs somebody temperature at the time of application products, including cancellations, will have to account for it. If that some- shows you were paying attention to what renewals, and suspensions.
Recommended publications
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, SVP8, 12/17/2010
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION Joseph A. Conti Summit VetPharm 301 Route 17 North Rutherford, New Jersey 07070 DEC 1 7 Subject: Notification: Alternate Brand Names SVP8 EPA Reg. No. 83399-9 Date Submitted: December 1, 2010 Alternate Brand Names: SimpleGuard for Cats SimpleGuard for Cats and Kittens Dear Mr. Conti: The Agency is in receipt of your Application for Pesticide Notification under Pesticide Registration Notice (PRN) 98-10 dated December 1, 2010 for the product referenced above. The Registration Division (RD) has conducted a review of this request for its applicability under PRN 98-10 and finds that the action requested falls within the scope of PRN 98-10. The label submitted with the application has been stamped "Notification" and will be placed in our records. If you have any questions, please contact me at (703) 306-0415 or [email protected]. Sincerely, Kable Bo Davis Entomologist Insecticide-Rodenticide Branch Office of Pesticide Programs Print Form ^S£je_ntd_[ngtn/ctipru on revent form. Form Approved. OMB No. 2070-O060 United Statoe Registration OPP Identifier Number v>EPA ntal Protection Agency X Amendment 'oflliinoton, DC 20460 X Other Application for Pesticide - Section 1. Company/Product Number 2. EPA Product Manager 3. Proposed Classification 83399-9 J. Hebert 1 Restricted 4. Company/Product (Name) PM* SVP8 7 5. Name and Addroos of Applicant (Include ZIP Code) 6. Expedited Review. In accordance with FIFRA Section 3(c)(3) SummitVetPharm (b)(i), my product Is similar or identical In composition and labeling 301 Route 17 North to: Rutherford, New Jersey 07070 EPA Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Features & Benefits
    Click Here To Purchase Features & Benefits: • TAURUS SC is a water-based suspension concentrate of 9.1% Fipronil for Pre and Post-construction termite applications, and to control perimeter pests • Apply at a rate of 4 gallons of dilution per 10 linear feet per foot of depth for termites • TAURUS SC is labeled for barrier applications targeting listed occasional invaders around structures • Now with EP/LI applications PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS ® Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals Caution TAURUS SC Harmful if swallowed, absorbed through skin or inhaled. Do not get in eyes, on skin Termiticide / Insecticide or on clothing. Do not breathe spray mist. Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling and before eating, drinking, chewing gum, or using tobacco. Remove and It is a violation of federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent wash contaminated clothing before reuse. with its labeling. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): • For sale to, use and storage only by individuals/firms licensed or registered All pesticide handlers (mixers, loaders, and applicators) must wear long-sleeved by the state to apply termiticide and/or general pest control products. shirt and long pants, socks, shoes, and chemical-resistant gloves. All pesticide • DO NOT use this product for termite or other pest control indoors, except for handlers must wear a dust/mist filtering respirator (MSHA/NIOSH approval number label-specified applications for termite control and foam applications to wall prefix TC-21C), or a NIOSH approved respirator with any N, R, P or HE filter, when voids for control of other listed pests. working in a non-ventilated space, including but not limited to crawl-spaces and • DO NOT use on golf course turf.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Use of Lead Arsenate and Survey of Soil Residues in Former Apple Orchards in Virginia
    HISTORICAL USE OF LEAD ARSENATE AND SURVEY OF SOIL RESIDUES IN FORMER APPLE ORCHARDS IN VIRGINIA by Therese Nowak Schooley Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN LIFE SCIENCES in Entomology Michael J. Weaver, Chair Donald E. Mullins, Co-Chair Matthew J. Eick May 4, 2006 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: arsenic, lead, lead arsenate, orchards, soil residues, historical pesticides HISTORICAL USE OF LEAD ARSENATE AND SURVEY OF SOIL RESIDUES IN FORMER APPLE ORCHARDS IN VIRGINIA Therese Nowak Schooley Abstract Inorganic pesticides including natural chemicals such as arsenic, copper, lead, and sulfur have been used extensively to control pests in agriculture. Lead arsenate (PbHAsO4) was first used in apple orchards in the late 1890’s to combat the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus). The affordable and persistent pesticide was applied in ever increasing amounts for the next half century. The persistence in the environment in addition to the heavy applications during the early 1900’s may have led to many of the current and former orchards in this country being contaminated. In this study, soil samples were taken from several apple orchards across the state, ranging from Southwest to Northern Virginia and were analyzed for arsenic and lead. Based on naturally occurring background levels and standards set by other states, two orchards sampled in this study were found to have very high levels of arsenic and lead in the soil, Snead Farm and Mint Spring Recreational Park. Average arsenic levels at Mint Spring Recreational Park and Snead Farm were found to be 65.2 ppm and 107.6 ppm, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Pest Control
    SAFE PEST CONTROL U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development • Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control “For years, cockroaches have defeated our best efforts to get rid of them. We sprayed and sprayed, but they always came back. Now we under- stand there are better methods and products that really work” Environmental Health Watch Did you know...? ■ Many pesticides for home use are toxic? ■ There are alternative pest management methods that limit the use of toxic substances? ■ Mice, cockroaches, and cockroach "dust” can trigger asthma attack? What is it? Integrated pest management (IPM) is a way to remove pests, like cock- roaches, mice, and rats from a home. IPM is a common sense approach that: ■ Denies pests food, water, shelter and a way to enter the home. ■ Uses baits and powders, such as gel baits, traps and borate powder. Why use IPM? ■ IPM is safer. IPM does not use as many harmful pesticides as traditional pest control. - Avoiding pesticides is especially important in homes. Pesticides can contain long lasting, toxic chemicals or lung irritants that cause asthma attacks. Children are among those most vulnerable to exposure. IPM strategies apply pesticides only as needed and use the least hazardous pesticides to control pests. continued on back www.hud.gov/offices/lead U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development SAFE PEST CONTROL Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control Non-toxic traps can be part of an IPM strategy. If needed, call a pest control professional who uses IPM practices. If you have taken all the steps described above and still have a pest problem, you may need a professional to help.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-Cyano-3-Benzoylamino-N
    (19) TZZ _T (11) EP 2 427 427 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: C07C 255/60 (2006.01) 25.12.2013 Bulletin 2013/52 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 10713937.0 PCT/EP2010/054862 (22) Date of filing: 14.04.2010 (87) International publication number: WO 2010/127926 (11.11.2010 Gazette 2010/45) (54) 4-CYANO-3-BENZOYLAMINO-N-PHENYL-BENZAMIDES FOR USE IN PEST CONTROL 4-CYANO-3-BENZOYLAMINO-N-PHENYL-BENZAMIDE ZUR VERWENDUNG IN DER SCHÄDLINGSBEKÄMPFUNG 4-CYANO-3-BENZOYLAMINO-N-PHÉNYL-BENZAMIDES DESTINÉS À ÊTRE UTILISÉS DANS LA LUTTE ANTIPARASITAIRE (84) Designated Contracting States: • HUETER, Ottmar Franz AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR CH-4332 Stein (CH) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL • MAIENFISCH, Peter PT RO SE SI SK SM TR CH-4332 Stein (CH) (30) Priority: 06.05.2009 GB 0907822 (74) Representative: Herrmann, Jörg et al 18.12.2009 GB 0922234 Syngenta Crop Protection Münchwilen AG (43) Date of publication of application: Intellectual Property Department 14.03.2012 Bulletin 2012/11 Schaffhauserstrasse CH-4332 Stein (CH) (73) Proprietor: Syngenta Participations AG 4058 Basel (CH) (56) References cited: EP-A1- 1 714 958 WO-A1-2008/000438 (72) Inventors: WO-A1-2008/074427 • JUNG, Pierre Joseph Marcel CH-4332 Stein (CH) Remarks: • GODFREY, Christopher Richard Ayles Thefile contains technical information submitted after CH-4332 Stein (CH) the application was filed and not included in this specification Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Needs Chlorpyrifos and Why (By Crop)?
    1 WHO NEEDS CHLORPYRIFOS AND WHY (BY CROP)? EXCERPTS OF COMMENTS SUBMITTED TO EPA AT EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0653 GENERAL “Consumers I have visited with that do not have any ag background are easily swayed into the belief that farmers are polluting the environment and recklessly applying chemicals. Truth is our farmers are professionals and with today’s pricing cannot afford to be over- or misapplying inputs that affect their bottom lines…. I strongly suggest that you…allow producers of the world’s food source to continue using the product chlorpyrifos.” – North Dakota farmer. “Many food crop industries in the Pacific Northwest are concerned about the impacts to pest management based on EPA’s proposed tolerance revocation of chlorpyrifos, including several minor crop groups with limited pesticide options. These industries include processed vegetables, strawberry, grass seed, mint, and cranberry. For many of these industries, chlorpyrifos has unique properties that make it an essential part of their Integrated Pest Management program. It is also an important tool for resistance management. Several of these industries have conducted research to identify effective alternatives to chlorpyrifos, but currently there aren’t viable alternatives that match the efficacy and low risk of this product for managing a number of critical pests…. A revocation of all chlorpyrifos tolerances would eliminate a number of low-risk, critical uses in cases where few alternatives exist at present, and in many cases those alternatives (neonicotinoids, pyrethroids) would be less efficacious, more expensive and have greater impacts on nontarget species including pollinators and beneficial insects. Further, the economic impacts based on resulting crop damage would be substantial.” – Oregon State University Agronomist.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Maple Scale in the Nursery
    College of Agriculture, Human and Natural Science Cooperative Extension Japanese Maple Scale in the Nursery Karla Addesso and Adam Blalock ANR-ENT-01-2015 Scale insects are serious and damaging pests to trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants. A scale infestation will reduce plant growth, vigor, and yields. There are hundreds of different species of scale and scale-like insects, but only a fraction of them are of economic concern. Some species of scale secrete a waterproof waxy shell that protects them from the environment and water based insecticides, making them difficult to control. In Tennessee nurseries, landscapes, and orchards, there are many different species of scale that you may encounter, but one of the most common and problematic is the Japanese maple scale (Lopholeucaspis japonica). Japanese Maple Scale: Japanese maple scale (JMS) is an armored scale that was first introduced to the eastern United States in the early part of the 20th century. Since then, it has spread to many areas of the country, including Tennessee. The reproductive potential of JMS is enormous. In three years, at two generations per year, a single male and female scale have the potential to spawn millions of new scales. Under Image 1 (top). The individual Japanese maple natural conditions, scale predators, parasites, disease scales are oyster-shaped, 1-2 mm long, and and sub-optimal environmental conditions prevent off-white in color. scale numbers from reaching these levels. Nursery production fields and container yards often provide Image 2 (bottom). If left, un-treated, better habitat for scales due to a lack of natural Japanese maple scale populations can increase predators from generic wide spectrum pesticide exponentially to where nearly the entire sprays, and close proximity of suitable hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Growth Regulator KEEP out of REACH of CHILDREN. CAUTION
    SPECIMEN LABEL Archer® 1 PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals CAUTION Harmful if swallowed or absorbed through skin. Do not breathe vapor or spray mist. Avoid contact with skin or eyes. In case of contact, flush with plenty of water. Wash with soap and warm water after use. Obtain medical attention if irritation persists. Avoid contamination of food or feedstuffs. Environmental Hazards This product is toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Do not apply directly to bodies of water, or to areas where surface water is present, or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not contaminate water when cleaning equipment or disposing Insect Growth Regulator of equipment wash water. An insect growth regulator (IGR) for use in homes, apartments, Physical or Chemical Hazards schools, warehouses, offices, and other private, commercial or Do not use or store near heat or open flame. public buildings, in non-food preparation areas of food handling and processing establishments, in transport vehicles, animal CONDITIONS OF SALE AND LIMITATION OF housing facilities, and outdoor perimeter treatments on and adjacent to buildings and structures, and in pet areas WARRANTY AND LIABILITY A c t i v e I ngr edien t : NOTICE: Read the entire Directions for Use and Conditions 2- [ 1- m et hy l- 2- ( 4- p he no x y 1 phen.... ox1 .3y% ) et hoxof Sale y ] and py Limitation r i dine of Warranty and Liability before buying Other Ingredients* 98.7% or using this product. If the terms are not acceptable, return the product at once, unopened, and the purchase price will be Tot al: 100.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorpyrifos, Part 1: Toxicology
    JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM/ WINTER 1994 • VOL.14, NO. 4 ■ INSECTICIDE FACTSHEET CHLORPYRIFOS, PART 1: TOXICOLOGY The broad spectrum organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos is the most widely used insecticide in the U.S. Total use is estimated at almost 30 million pounds per year. Like all organophosphate insecticides, chlorpyrifos affects the nervous system by inhibiting an enzyme that is important in the transmission of nerve impulses. Symptoms of acute poisoning include headache, nausea, muscle twitching, and convulsions. Chlorpyrifos poisonings are reported to state and federal agencies more often than poisonings of almost every other insecticide. In both laboratory animals and humans, chlorpyrifos can also cause delayed effects on the nervous system. Some effects have been measured years after exposure. Human birth defects have been associated with exposure to chlorpyrifos products. In pregnant laboratory animals, chlorpyrifos exposure caused fetal death. Pups that did survive were smaller pups and did not survive as well as pups from unexposed mothers. Chlorpyrifos also affects the male reproductive system; exposure to a chlorpyrifos product has caused death of cells in male rat testes and a decrease in sperm production in cattle. Chlorpyrifos has caused genetic damage in human blood and lymph cells, mice spleen cells, and hamster bone marrow cells. Immune system abnormalities have been reported from patients exposed to chlorpyrifos. Many individuals report developing sensitivities to a broad array of substances following chlorpyrifos exposure. The second part of this factsheet will discuss human exposure to chlorpyrifos and the ecological effects of chlorpyrifos. BY CAROLINE COX mary agricultural uses are for oranges, al- plications are made annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Cockroach Control Manual
    COCKROACHCOCKROACH CONTROLCONTROL MANUALMANUAL (Photo by J. Kalisch) Barb Ogg, Extension Educator, Lancaster County Clyde Ogg, Extension Educator, Pesticide Safety Education Program Dennis Ferraro, Extension Educator, Douglas & Sarpy Counties Extension is a Division of the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln cooperating with the Counties and the United States Department of Agriculture. ® University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension’s educational programs abide with the nondiscrimination policies of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture. Table of Contents 1 Chapter 1: Introduction 5 Chapter 2: Know Your Enemy 9 Chapter 3: Cockroach Biology 15 Chapter 4: Locate Problem Areas 23 Chapter 5: Primary Control Strategies: Modify Resources 31 Chapter 6: Low-Risk Control Strategies 37 Chapter 7: Insecticide Basics 45 Chapter 8: Insecticides and Your Health 53 Chapter 9: Insecticide Applications 59 Chapter 10: Putting a Management Plan Together i Cockroach Control Manual Preface It has been more than 10 years since the first edition of the Cockroach Control Manual was completed. While the basic steps for effective and safe cockroach control are still the same, there are more types of control products available than there were 10 years ago. This means you have even more choices in your arsenal to help fight roaches. The Cockroach Control Manual is a practical reference for persons who have had little or no training in insect identification, biology or control methods. We know most people want low toxic methods used inside their homes so we are emphasizing low-risk strategies even more than in the original edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracting for Pest Control Service in Public Buildings ______A
    Contracting for Pest Control Service in Public Buildings _____________________________________________________ A. Greene Regional Entomologist U. S. General Services Administration Three Core Principles of Public Sector Contracting ______________________________________________________ Contracting is Law The Principle of Fairness Competition must be maximized No bidder can be unfairly excluded The Principle of Frugality Minimum requirements only The goal should be greatest value The Six Principal Components of Service Contracting ______________________________________________________ Program management Type of contract Estimating cost Method of award Statement of work Quality assurance 1. Program Management ______________________________________________________ Who will be the Integrated Pest MANAGER? IPM = Integrated Procurement Mission 2. Type of Contract ________________________________________________________ Janitorial service or separate contract? How will the work be ordered & paid for? Firm-Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery __________________________________________________________The Firm-Fixed-Price Contract Advantages: Minimum administrative burden Easiest type of contract to budget for Disadvantages: Highly inflated prices if bidders feel there are high cost risks, e.g.: Excessive monitoring/recordkeeping requirements High-cost, indeterminate specialty work included (e.g. termites, bird deterrence, wildlife trapping) __________________________________________________________The Firm-Fixed-Price Contract Needless (& Expensive)
    [Show full text]
  • Broadacre Pest Control After DDT
    Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 Volume 28 Number 3 1987 Article 2 1-1-1987 Broadacre pest control after DDT P J. Michael Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4 Part of the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Recommended Citation Michael, P J. (1987) "Broadacre pest control after DDT," Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4: Vol. 28 : No. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol28/iss3/2 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BROADACRE PEST CONTROL AFTER y.'4 Bv Phil Michael, Entomologist DDT may no longer be applied to broadacre crops grown in Western Australia. It is being replaced by other effective chemicals and with new methods of pest control. DDT was the most effective chemical for the control •»*mwi of several major broadacre pests in this State and farmers may well wonder why this change was necessary and how they will manage without DDT. MS«£22?!«s r Journal of Agriculture, Vol 27, No. 4, 1986 75 Benefits of DDT As DDT was effective against a wide range of insects, it sometimes reduced the numbers The outstanding effectiveness of DDT against of predators and parasites even more than a wide range of local pests was demonstrated the pests.
    [Show full text]