DOCSLIB.ORG

Status of Tigers in Pilibhit Forest Division Terai Arc Landscape, Uttar Pradesh, India Citation: Anwar, M., Kumar, H., Vattakaven, J., 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status of Tigers in Pilibhit Forest Division Terai Arc Landscape, Uttar Pradesh, India Citation: Anwar, M., Kumar, H., Vattakaven, J., 2010 Status of Tigers in Pilibhit Forest Division Terai Arc Landscape, Uttar Pradesh, India Citation: Anwar, M., Kumar, H., Vattakaven, J., 2010. Status of Tigers in Pilibhit Forest Division, Terai Arc Landscape, Uttar Pradesh, India. WWF-India. Copyright © 2010- All rights reserved WWF-India 172-B, Lodi Estate New Delhi 110 003, India Tel. +91-11-4150 4797 Website: www.wwfindia.org Published: August 2010 Tiger Population In Pilibhit Forest Division 2010 page 2 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6 SUMMARY 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 8 CHAPTER 2: STUDY AREA 10 2.1 Location 2.2 Physical features 2.3 Flora & fauna CHAPTER 3: METHODS 14 3.1 Pre-field work 3.2 Reconnaissance survey 3.3 Data collection 3.4 Analytical details 3.4.1 Mark-Recapture approach 3.4.2 Inverse Prediction Method for density estimation 3.4.3 Maximum Likelihood method for density estimation CHAPTER 4: RESULTS 21 4.1 Capture Dynamics 4.2 New Capture Saturation 4.3 Closure Test and Model selection 4.4 Tiger Population (N-hat) 4.5 Tiger Density (D-hat) CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION 28 5.1 Capture Dynamics 5.2 New Capture Saturation 5.3 Closure Test and Model selection 5.4 Tiger Population (N-hat) 5.5 Tiger Density (D-hat) CHAPTER 6: MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS AND 30 RECOMMENDATIONS REFERENCES 31 ANNEXURES 34 Annexure 1 Annexure 2 Annexure 3 Annexure 4 Annexure 5 Annexure 6 Annexure 7 Annexure 8 Annexure 9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1: Location map of Pilibhit forest division and adjoining Protected Areas Figure 3.1: Location of trap stations over Landsat image of Pilibhit forest division Figure 3.3: Camera trap locations with minimum convex polygon, ½ MMDM and MMDM buffers (a) and with habitat masking (b) Figure 4.1: Percentage of captures of males and females in different quarters of total occasions Figure 4.2: Photographs of individual tigers (Right & Left flanks) with a map of capture sites Figure 4.3: Rate of tiger photographs and cumulative number of new captures in Pilibhit Forest Division LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1: X-matrix of individual tigers (11) in Pilibhit forest division for 40 occasions and 73 captures used in Capture, CloseTest and MARK 4.1 Table 3.2: Matrix used in Density 4.4.5 Table 3.3: Trap location file used in Density 4.4.5 Table 4.1: Selected model and tiger population with other statistics in the study area Table 4.2: Tiger density and other statistics in the study area © JOSEPH VATTAKAVEN/WWF-INDIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the following organizations and associated individuals for their help and inputs in carrying out the present study successfully. Forest Department, Uttar Pradesh, for permission, logistic support, secondary information, and assistance in data collection. Mr. B. K. Patnaik, (PCCF), Mr. V. K. Singh (DFO-Pilibhit), Mr. S. R. Singh (S.D.O.), Mr. R. P. Yadav (Range Officer (RO)-Mahof), Mr. Alijaan Ansari (R.O.-Mala), Mr. Imtiyaz Siddiqui (R.O.- Barahi), Mr. Mobin Arif (Forester), Mr. Navneet Singh (Forester), Mr. M. Arif (Forester), Mr. P. P. Singh (Forester), forest guards, beat watchers and rest house care takers. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, for technical inputs, guidance in data analysis, and assistance in data collection Mr. Qamar Qureshi (Scientist-F), Dr. Y.V. Jhala (Scientist-G), Mr. Manas P. Manjrekar (Research Fellow), Mr. Dipankar Lakhar (Research Fellow), Mr. Awanish K. Rai (Research Fellow), Mr. Wasi Azmi (Volunteer), Mr. Anant Pandey (Research Fellow ), Mr. Chitranjan Dave (Research Fellow), Ms. Swati, Mrs. Babita and Mr. Ved P. Ola. WWF- India (Pilibhit Field Office), for accounts management and smooth running of data collection. Mr. Anil Srivastva (Accounts officer), Mr. Kandhai lal (Asst. Project Officer), Mr. Virendra (Driver), Mr. Prem (Driver). WWF- India (Ramnagar Field Office), for accounts related tasks and coordination. Mr. Hem Tewari (Landscape Coordinator), Mr. Neeraj Pant (Accounts Officer), Mr. Prem (Office Attendant). WWF- India (Secretariat-New Delhi) We wish to thank Mr. Ravi Singh, SG & CEO, WWF-India. Dr. Sejal Worah, Programme Director, & Dr Dipankar Ghose, Director, Species and Landscapes for their timely inputs and help with logistics and coordination. Thanks are also due to Copal Mathur, Sonali Nandrajog and Anil Cherukupalli for designing and editing this report. A special thank you to Mrs. V. K. Singh, for regularly motivating the team in the field. We are also thankful to the local stakeholders (villagers) for restraining themselves from the study area during data collection and making the study disturbance free without any loss of camera traps. -Sd. (Authors) SUMMARY Tigers are a flagship and conservation dependant species © JOSEPH VATTAKAVEN/WWF-INDIA Estimating the density of tigers in an area provides crucial information to conserve and manage tigers, its prey base and habitat. The population and density of tigers in Pilibhit forest division was estimated in a systematic scientific framework using the camera trapping technique. Thirty best sites were selected as camera trap stations on the basis of occurrence of tiger signs. A total of 174 photographs were captured in 1200 trap days over 40 occasions with 76.7% tiger photo capture success rate per trap station. Eleven individual adult tigers were identified on the basis of unique strip patterns. The capture curve for new tigers reached an asymptote on the 13th occasion. Population of tigers was estimated to be 12±1.50 (N-hat±SE) by the selected model (Mh jackknife) and it could range between 12 and 19 (95% Confidence Interval). Density of the tigers in the Pilibhit Forest Divison was estimated to be 3.86±1.20 per 100 km² (D-hat±SE) using Maximum Likelihood method (Half normal, AIC=804.64) ranging between 2.13 to 7.00 (95% Confidence Interval) and 4.95±1.2 per 100 km² using ½ MMDM method with habitat masking and ranging between 4.58 and 8.00 per 100 km². Considering the biodiversity rich habitat of Pilibhit Forest Division, including breeding tigers, and its connectivity to other critical forest blocks in this landscape, we recommend enhancing the protection and status of this reserve forest and declaring it as a Tiger Reserve at the earliest. Tiger Population In Pilibhit Forest Division 2010 page 7 Chapter 1 Tigers are a conservation dependent species. They require 1.0 protection from poaching, an adequate prey base, and adequate INTRODUCTION habitat. While the tiger as a species may not go extinct within the next two decades, the current trajectory may cause wild populations to disappear in many places, or shrink to the point of “ecological extinction”-where their numbers are too few to play their role as the top predator in the ecosystem (Sanderson et al. 2006). Conflict with humans, prey depletion, poaching, habitat loss and habitat fragmentation remain the most obvious threats to tigers in the wild, underscoring the need for political will to confront these challenges (Seidensticker et al. 1999a; Johnsingh & Negi 2003; Graham et al. 2005; Wang & Macdonald 2006). India harbors a reasonably large proportion of the world’s tiger population. This is mainly attributed to a good forest cover (158,373 km2, 4.82% of total geographical area) under a Protected Area network (660) of 99 National Parks, 514 Wildlife Sanctuaries, 43 Conservation Reserves and 4 Community Reserves (NWDC, W.I.I. 2010) including 38 Tiger Reserves with an area of 32137.14 km2 (NTCA 2010). In India, conservation efforts such as Project Tiger have, since 1973, been attempting to save the nations declining population of tigers, their prey and habitats. Yet, about 26% of their range has been lost in the recent past (Qureshi et al. 2006). One such landscape, the Terai Arc Landscape, encompassing the Shivalik hills and the Terai flood plains running parallel to the outer Himalayas are considered one of the most threatened and fragile ecosystems in the Indian subcontinent. This productive landscape (Wikramanayake et al. 2004) is most prone to human disturbances (Johnsingh et al. 2004). The tiger has become locally extinct in 29% of the districts of this landscape where it was historically recorded. Currently, the tiger occupies 5080 km2 of forested habitats (Jhala et al. 2008). Protection cover for tigers diminish rapidly in the areas outside declared Protected Areas where boundaries of land use by humans and core tiger habitat are often blurred. These areas also witness human-wildlife conflict frequently. Therefore, estimating the population and density of wild tigers in such areas is of prime importance to ecologists and managers. In most situations the goals of managing natural animal populations are expressed in terms of population size. The use of capture-recapture theory (Otis et al. 1978; Pollock et al. 1990) and remotely triggered cameras to capture individually identifiable animals has resulted in their use for estimating demographic parameters (Karanth 1995; Karanth and Nichols 1998; Karanth et al. 2006). Owing to its applicability in a wide variety of habitats (Karanth et al. 2004) and ability to provide information on activity pattern, habitat use and reproductive status of cryptic carnivores, camera trapping has in the recent past gained popularity (Griffiths 1993; Karanth 1995; Karanth and Nichols 1998; O’Brien et al. 2003; Trolle and Kery 2003). Availability of various softwares such as CAPTURE (Rextad & Burnham 1991), MARK 4.1 (Cooch & White 1995) and Density 4.4.5 (Efford 2009) etc. makes this technique hassle free and statistically highly precise for estimation of populations. Tiger Population In Pilibhit Forest Division 2010 page 8 ©JOSEPH VATTAKAVEN/WWF-INDIA Tiger in Sal forest habitat The present study was carried out in Pilibhit forest division in Uttar Pradesh, which is a reserve forest in a human dominated landscape matrix. This study was the first of its kind in this forest division and was well supported by the Forest Department.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Can Community Forestry Conserve Tigers in India?
    Can Community Forestry Conserve Tigers in India? Shibi Chandy David L. Euler Abstract—Active participation of local people through community (Ontario Ministry for Natural Resources 1994). In most forestry has been successful in several developed countries. In the developing countries, like India, the socio-economic prob- early 1980’s, developing countries tried to adopt this approach for lems will have to be addressed first to achieve the objectives the conservation and management of forests. Nepal, for example, of conservation (Kuchli 1997). has gained considerable support from local people by involving them Royal Bengal Tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) (fig. 1) are in conservation policies and actions. This paper illustrates that endangered and almost on the verge of extinction. Conser- people living near the Sundarbans Tiger Reserve/National Park in vation of these animals in Asia poses serious problems, as India should not be considered mere gatherers of forest products. their population has been reduced significantly due to They can also be active managers and use forest resources hunting, poaching, and habitat shrinkage. Reserves and sustainably, which will help in the conservation of tigers. parks have been established to protect the animals and separate people from the forests. This, however, has caused Conservation of tigers in Asia, especially in India, is a major concern. The Sundarbans offers a unique habitat for tigers, but the conservation strategies followed for the past 20 years have not yielded much result. One of the major reasons is that local people and their needs were ignored. Lack of concern for the poverty/forest interface, which takes a heavy toll on human lives, is another reason for failure.
    [Show full text]
  • National Tiger Conservation Authority Ministry of Environment & Forests
    F. No. 3-1/2003-PT REVISED GUIDELINES FOR THE ONGOING CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OF PROJECT TIGER FEBRUARY, 2008 National Tiger Conservation Authority Ministry of Environment & Forests Government of India 1 Government of India Ministry of Environment & Forests National Tiger Conservation Authority REVISED GUIDELINES FOR THE ONGOING CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OF PROJECT TIGER (1) Introduction: Project Tiger is an ongoing Centrally Sponsored Scheme of the Ministry of Environment and Forests. The revised guidelines incorporate the additional activities for implementing the urgent recommendations of the Tiger Task Force, constituted by the National Board for Wildlife, chaired by the Hon’ble Prime Minister. These, interalia, also include support for implementing the provisions of the Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2006, which has come into force with effect from 4.09.2006. The activities are as below: (i) Antipoaching initiatives (ii) Strengthening infrastructure within tiger reserves (iii) Habitat improvement and water development (iv) Addressing man-animal conflicts (v) Co-existence agenda in buffer / fringe areas with landscape approach (vi) Deciding inviolate spaces and relocation of villages from crucial tiger habitats within a timeframe by providing a better relocation package, apart from supporting States for settlement of rights of such people (vii) Rehabilitation of traditional hunting tribes living in and around tiger reserves (viii) Providing support to States for research and field equipments (ix) Supporting States for staff development and capacity building in tiger reserves. (x) Mainstreaming wildlife concerns in tiger bearing forests outside tiger reserves, and fostering corridor conservation in such areas through restorative strategy involving local people to arrest fragmentation of habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • WTI Brochure Latest Lowres-1.Pdf
    Our Mission To conserve wildlife and its habitat and to work for the welfare of individual wild animals in partnership with communities and governments Indiscriminate slaughter of bull elephants has created absurdly skewed sex ratios that can have serious The Need demographic and genetic implications for the species. Even more worrying is the rampant destruction and fragmentation of elephant habitats, especially the impairment of traditional migratory corridors which is A land of striking contrasts, India is home to rich bringing elephants into increasing conflict with humans. biodiversity and wildlife. Although the country’s three Equally endangered are the musk deer and the snow flagship species – the Royal Bengal tiger, the greater leopard that face poaching and habitat loss in the alpine one-horned rhinoceros and the Asian elephant – Himalayas. Several magnificent birds such as the western dominate the spotlight, India is home to 423 mammal tragopan, the greater adjutant stork, the sarus crane, species, 1233 bird species, 526 reptile species, 342 the great Indian bustard and the Bengal florican require amphibian species, 3022 fish species, over 80,000 immediate attention. The pygmy hog, hispid hare, invertebrate species, and more than 50,000 plant species. hoolock gibbon, Malabar civet, Ganges river dolphin, The Indian wilderness also contains four of the world’s 35 gharial, olive Ridley turtle and whale shark are but a few biodiversity hotspots, 26 of the world’s most important examples of native and migrant species that are caught wetlands as defined by the Ramsar Convention, and in a crisis situation. seven natural World Heritage Sites as defined by UNESCO.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Tigers in the Sundarban Landscape Bangladesh and India
    Status of Tigers in the Sundarban Landscape Bangladesh and India Principal Investigators T. K. Dey, Md. J. Kabir, Q. Qureshi & Y. V. Jhala Bangladesh Forest Department National Tiger Conservation Authority T.K. Dey, M. J. Kabir, M. M. Ahsan, S. P. Yadav, Himmat S. Negi, B. S. Bonal M. M. Islam, M. M. R. Chowdhury & S. Hassan. & Rajesh Gopal World Wide Fund for Nature - India West Bengal Forest Department Debmalya Roy Chowdhury, Pankaj Sarkar, Soumitra Dasgupta & Pradeep Shukla Ratul Saha, Sunit Kumar Das & Jimmy Bora Wildlife Institute of India Manjari Roy, Dipanjan Naha, Ahana Dutta, Bhaskar J Bora, Manendra Kaneria, Rahul K Talegaonkar, Sougata Sadhukan, Urjit M Bhatt, Ujjwal Sinha, Q. Qureshi & Y. V. Jhala Suggested Citation: Jhala, Y.V., Dey, T.K., Qureshi, Q., Kabir, J., Md., Bora, J. & Roy, M. 2016. Status of tigers in the Sundarban landscape Bangladesh and India. Bangladesh Forest Department; National Tiger Conservation Authority, New Delhi, & Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. TRNO -2016/002. i çdk'k tkoMsdj jkT; ea=kh (Lora=k çHkkj) Prakash Javadekar MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) i;kZoj.k] ou ,oa tyok;q ifjorZu ENVIRONMENT, FOREST & CLIMATE CHANGE Hkkjr ljdkj /GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Message Sundarbans is the last unexplored mystical home of the tiger. Here the tiger is dreaded and worshipped. It serves as a guardian of these majestic forests and has saved them from human overexploitation. For the first time, the joint assessment of tiger status by Bangladesh and India using a common standard scientific protocol, has unraveled the ecological aspects of this unique and little known tiger population that will be of immense value for its conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Section II: Periodic Report on the State of Conservation of the Manas
    PERIODIC REPORTING EXERCISE ON THE APPLICATION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION SECTION II State of Conservation of specific World Heritage properties State Party: INDIA Property Name: Manas National Park Periodic Reporting Exercise on the Application of the World Heritage Convention Section II: State of conservation of specific World Heritage properties II.1. Introduction a. Country (and State Party if different): 001 India. b. Name of World Heritage property: 002 Manas Wildlife Sanctuary, now National Park c. In order to locate the property precisely, please attach a topographic map showing scale, 003 orientation, projection, datum, site name, date and graticule. The map should be an original print and not be trimmed. The site boundaries should be shown on the map. In addition they can be submitted in a detailed description, indicating topographic and other legally defined national, regional, or international boundaries followed by the site boundaries. The State Parties are encouraged to submit the geographic information in digital form so that it can be integrated into a Geographic Information System (GIS). On this questionnaire indicate the geographical co-ordinates to the nearest second (in the case of large sites, towns, areas etc., give at least 3 sets of geographical co- ordinates): Centre point: 90o 56’30” E 26o 39” N North-west corner: 90o 46’ 30” E 26o 42” N South-east corner: 91o 10’2” E 26o 37” N d. Give the date of inscription on the World Heritage List and subsequent extension 004 (if applicable): 6 – 12 – 1985 e. Organisation(s) or entity(ies) responsible for the preparation of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Review on Manas National Park and Its Future Prospect
    International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies (IRJIMS) A Peer-Reviewed Monthly Research Journal ISSN: 2394-7969 (Online), ISSN: 2394-7950 (Print) Volume-II, Issue-V, June2016, Page No. 40-46 Published by: Scholar Publications, Karimganj, Assam, India, 788711 Website: http://www.irjims.com A Critical Review on Manas National Park and Its Future Prospect Dipankar Choudhury Department of Mathematics, Bhawanipur Anchalik College, Barpeta, Assam, India Abstract Manas National Park in Assam, India, is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and part of an Indian Tiger Reserve, Elephant Reserve and Biosphere Reserve. During late 1980’s & 1990’s it faced tremendous anthropogenic pressure due to ethnic agitation in the area resulting in large scale destruction of the forest and its wildlife. However, after the resolution of this agitation, Manas is on its way back to normalcy. Camera trapping surveys that were conducted to determine tiger and prey status also helped in obtaining the first detailed baseline data of carnivores in the park in the post-conflict period. In this paper I am going to discuss various issue related to Manas national Park such as to protect the presence resources, manage them, and detect to changes them and also understand the natural dynamics and processes of populations, ecosystems, and other park resources. Introduction: Manas National Park is located in the State of Assam in North-East India, a biodiversity hotspot. The name ‘Manas’ is derived from the Hindu deity, the snake goddess ‘Manasa’ and is also shared with the Manas river that transverses through the park. Covering an area of 39,100 hectares, it spans the Manas River and is bounded to the north by the forests of Bhutan.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem Tiger in the Sundarbans
    Journal of the Fauna Preservation Society February 1976 A reprint from Volume XIII No 3 s *• .'t«íA^'* ^. VILLAGE on reclaimed land near where the tiger was captured Problem Tiger in tlie Sundarbans John Seidensticker, R. K. Lahiri, K. C. Das, and Anne Wright In August 1974 a young male tiger moved into a populated area in the Sundar- bans, the delta of the Ganges, and killed one woman and a number of livestock. Rather than destroy the animal the Forest Directorate decided to capture it, using immobilising drugs, and release it in the Sundarbans Tiger Reserve. This was successfully done, but less than a week later it was found dead from wounds evidently inflicted by another tiger. The authors discuss the implications of the incident, the publicity it attracted, and the changes in public attitudes. In the early morning of August 2nd, 1974, a tiger was reported to have killed a woman near the village of Jharkhali, 70 km. south-east of Calcutta, in a re- claimed part of the Sundarbans in the Ganges delta. The tiger was sighted repeatedly over the next few days, and people were very alarmed. On August 7th, the State Wildlife Officer, R. K. Lahiri, arrived by motor launch to investigate and report to the West Bengal Forest Directorate, the authority responsible under the 1972 Wild Life Protection Act. The tiger was roaming in a densely populated region of a large delta island, a mosaic of paddy fields, villages and a large central mangrove marsh used as a fishery. The area had been part of reserve forest lands until about 1955, when it was reassigned for the resettlement of refugees.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Tiger
    Step 1 Step Step 2 Step 4 Step 3 Step 3 16900 Step 5 StepStep 5 5 Step 4 Step 4 15210 ADITI10 Tiger Census 2018: Guinness Book of World Records India’s 2018 Tiger Census has made it to the Guinness Book of World Records for being the world’s largest camera trapping wildlife survey. •Scientific Name: Panthera tigris •Indian Sub Species: Panthera tigris tigris. •Habitat: It stretches from Siberian temperate forests to subtropical and tropical forests on the Indian subcontinent and Sumatra. •It is the largest cat species and a member of the genus Panthera. Traditionally eight subspecies of tigers have been recognized, out of which three are extinct. • Bengal Tigers: Indian Subcontinent • Caspian tiger: Turkey through central and west Asia (extinct). • Amur tiger: Amur Rivers region of Russia and China, and North Korea • Javan tiger: Java, Indonesia (extinct). • South China tiger: South central China. • Bali tiger: Bali, Indonesia (extinct). • Sumatran tiger: Sumatra, Indonesia. • Indo-Chinese tiger: Continental south-east Asia. •Designated as the National Animal of India, Bengal Tiger is most recognisable for its dark vertical stripes on orange-brown fur with a lighter underside. •Importance: Tigers are terminal consumers in the ecological food pyramid, and their conservation results in the conservation of all trophic levels in an ecosystem. •Threats: Habitat destruction, habitat fragmentation and poaching. •Protection Status: • Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: Schedule I • International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List: Endangered. • Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES): Appendix I. •Tiger Reserves in India • Total Number: 50 • Largest: Nagarjunsagar Srisailam Tiger Reserve, Andhra Pradesh • Smallest: Orang National park, Assam •India has also fulfilled its resolution to double the Tiger numbers made at St.
    [Show full text]
  • Joining the Dots
    THE REPORT OF THE TIGER TASK FORCE JOINING THE DOTS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA i The Tiger Task Force was constituted pursuant to the decision taken during the second meeting of the National Board for Wildlife on March 17, 2003 The Ministry of Environment and Forests (Project Tiger) set up the task force vide notification no.6 (4)/2005-PT dated April 19, 2005 to review the management of tiger reserves. The terms of reference of the Task Force are as follows: 1. Suggest measures to strengthen tiger conservation in the country. 2. Suggest measures to incentivise the local community in conservation of tigers. 3. Suggest measures to incentivise local forest staff posted in sanctuaries/national parks and ensure an effective HR plan for tiger conservation/wildlife managers. 4. Suggest measures to improve the methodology of tiger counting and forecasting. 5. Suggest methods of transparent professional audit of wildlife parks and placing data on tiger conservation in the public domain. 6. Suggest a new wildlife management paradigm that shares concerns of conservation with the public at large. 2. The Project Tiger Division of the Ministry of Environment & Forests would be facilitating the working of the Task Force and render all necessary help. 3. The Task Force should submit its report within three months from the date of this notification. 4. The sitting fees and travel cost would be reimbursed to the Members of the Task Force as per norms. The Members of the Task Force are as follows: (1) Ms Sunita Narain, Director, Centre for Science and Environment. - Chairperson (2) Shri H S Panwar, Ex-Head, Project Tiger and Ex-Head, - Member Wild Life Institute of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Sundarbans National Park (1987)
    State of Conservation of the World Heritage Properties in the Asia-Pacific Region II INDIA Sundarbans National Park UNESCO UNESCO II.1 Introduction II.4 Management Year of Inscription 1987 Administrative and Management Arrangements Organisation Responsible for the Report • The core national park (also the WH Site comprising • Sundarban Tiger Reserve an area of 1,330 km2) is surrounded by 3 wildlife P O Canning, sanctuaries which act as the buffer zones from District 24 Parganas (South) human pressure. The entire Sundarbans 743 329, State of West Bengal administrative set up was restructured as a India UNESCO Biosphere Reserve in November 2001. • Legislation unique to the area includes the West II.2 Statement of Significance Bengal Amendment of the Indian Forest Act (1988); the Fisheries Act of the West Bengal Government; Inscription Criteria N ii, iv and the Coastal and Regulatory Zone Rules. • Follow-up to the IUCN recommendation to include Statement of Significance Sundarban-Bangladesh on the WH List was Proposed as follows: • achieved in 1997 with the financial support of UNDP. “The ‘Sunderbans’ represents the only Mangrove • The original management plan of 1973 for the Tiger land in the world… Sunderban tigers are ‘Sundarban Tiger Reserve’ has been updated for the capable of leading an almost amphibious life… [and] period 2001-2010. The property is divided between have perhaps lost their territoriality owing to the two ranges with an Officer who reports to the Field obliteration of urination marks by tidal waves. Apart Director. from the long stretch swimming it has adapted to changed food habits which include fish, crabs and • No rights, concessions, unauthorised entry, or water monitor lizards.” tourism is allowed within the WH Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Manas Wildlife Sanctuary Assam, India
    MANAS WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ASSAM, INDIA Manas Wildlife Sanctuary on the borders of the Indo-Gangetic and Indo-Malayan biogeographical realms is the most diverse of India’s wildlife reserves. It lies on a gentle alluvial slope in the foothills of the Himalayas, where wooded hills give way to grasslands and tropical forest. It is home to a great variety of wildlife, including many endangered species such as the tiger, the pygmy hog, and the Indian rhinoceros and elephant. Threats to the Site: This site was listed in Danger between 1992 and 2011, after invasion by militants of the Bodo tribe seeking political redress. Its infrastructure suffered great damage from 1988 to 1993 and political instability between 1990 and 1996 destroyed hundreds of trees and animals, including nearly all the Park’s rhinoceros and 50% of its tigers. The damage was estimated at more than US$2 million. Listing by the World Heritage Committee influenced the governments of India and the state of Assam to draw up, with the Park authorities, a $US2.35 million rehabilitation plan in 1997. Security and relations with local villagers improved but the threat of destruction remained until 2003 when the insurgents surrendered and began to cooperate through the newly formed Bodoland Territorial Council. The Park has since begun to recover and rebuild its infrastructure. COUNTRY India - Assam NAME Manas Wildlife Sanctuary NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SITE 1985: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria vii, ix and x. 1992-2011: Listed as a World Heritage site in Danger because of damage and losses caused by civil unrest.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Reactive Monitoring Mission to the Manas Wildlife
    World Heritage 32 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 20 May / 20 mai 2008 Original: English Distribution limited / limitée UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Thirty-second session / Trente deuxième session Quebec, Canada / Quebec, Canada 2 -10 July 2008 / 2-10 juillet 2008 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger. Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Manas Wildlife Sanctuary (India) (N 338) / Sanctuaire de faune de Manas (Inde) (N 338) 12 – 18 February 2008 / 12 – 18 Février 2008 This mission report should be read in conjunction with Document: Ce rapport de mission doit être lu conjointement avec le document suivant: WHC-08/32.COM/7A WHC-078A/32COM/ .Add WHC-08/32.COM/7B WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add UNESCO World Heritage Centre – IUCN MISSION REPORT Reactive Monitoring Mission to the Manas Wildlife Sanctuary, India From 12 to 18 February 2008 Crédit photographique: EMC²I-LETHIER Guy DEBONNET (UNESCO World Heritage Center) Hervé LETHIER (IUCN Consultant) April 2008
    [Show full text]