DOCSLIB.ORG

Historic Or Landmark Structure Rehabilitation Understanding Your Options

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historic Or Landmark Structure Rehabilitation Understanding Your Options Journal of architectural technology published by Hoffmann Architects, specialists in exterior rehabilitation First Issue 1999 Volume 17 Number 1 Historic or Landmark Structure Rehabilitation Understanding Your Options Arthur L. Sanders, AIA and assistance in selecting the right Paul C. Lanteri, AIA contractor for the job. • Representation and guidance in working with the landmark commis- I nvestment in a historic or landmark sion, where necessary. structure can bring reward, aesthetically • On-site construction administration as well as financially. But when leaks, by the design professional to monitor crumbling masonry, and damaged the progress of the rehabilitative effort roofing set in, that same building can and its conformance to specifications also bring headaches. Still, as the saying and drawings, as well as to respond goes, “you can’t make a silk purse out to unforeseen conditions. of a sow’s ear,” but you can make a silk purse out of silk: time-tested materials Where to Start and original quality of workmanship The best way to begin any rehabilitative mean that, with the right guidance, a work is with a thorough investigation. rehabilitation program can provide a This phase of the project analyzes the deteriorating historic or landmark current condition of the building structure with many more years of exterior, the extent and probable useful life. causes of deterioration, and offers a framework for designing the most An expert in building envelope main- appropriate repair solutions. Through tenance can design a plan that accom- the investigation, emergency repair modates individual aesthetic, historic needs are identified in the context of and budget considerations. Generally, longer range rehabilitation goals, the following should be included in an reducing the potential for high-cost effective program: change orders and schedule delays • Investigation into existing conditions, caused by unforeseen conditions. including review of original construc- tion documents and reports, as they The first step for the design profes- pertain to maintenance issues. sional is to research and evaluate the • Preparation of detailed construction original construction documents and drawings and specifications — and records of earlier repairs, surveys, and Paul C. Lanteri, AIA investigates masonry building alterations. One key to deterioration at the turn-of-the-century understanding the problems affecting a Goodwin Hotel in Hartford, CT. As Director of Architecture in the Connecticut office, Arthur L. Sanders, AIA structure — and to designing the right oversees a wide spectrum of historic and solution — lies with learning how the landmark rehabilitative work. Paul C. Lanteri, building was constructed. AIA, Project Architect, is responsible for exterior envelope projects for the firm. 1 Copyright Hoffmann Architects 1999 Hoffmann Architects / Journal anchorage will necessitate early replace- historic commission regulations have ment of the new facade. To guard been taken into account, a rehabilitation against such duplicate repairs, a thorough program can be designed to meet the investigation of the building materials is needs of a historic or landmark structure. essential before any work can begin. This includes a scope of work, proposed phasing, and probable costs. In addition to locating and evaluating current problems, conditions which Emergency Stabilization constitute potential risks to the future Once investigative work has been stability of the building envelope also completed, stabilizing the structure need attention. Preventive measures should be top priority. Any hazardous Behind the brick face of this historic should be included in the overall action conditions identified during the structure, a probe reveals interior masonry plan to limit or slow future deterioration. that has disintegrated to powder. Note also the dramatic brick displacement and lack of a proper seal at the mortar joints, If the building is a National Historic which can lead to moisture infiltration and Register property or a locally significant further damage. landmark, additional restrictions on repairs and other rehabilitative work With historic structures, these docu- may apply. Since the process of gaining ments are often unavailable, and even approval for construction adds extra when they are, the building construction time to the project schedule, regulatory may deviate from that shown on the issues must be researched and addressed plans. In any case, on-site observations by the design professional as early as are vital to identifying the presence possible in the initial investigatory phase. and extent of deterioration in facade, As an emergency measure, netting was window, roof, and structural systems. The goal of this investigation is to installed on this severely deteriorated, 80- Typically, this research may include design a plan of attack for building year-old cornice to prevent loose photographs of problem areas, test rehabilitation and maintenance. After materials from falling. cuts and probes, and laboratory drawings and construction documents analysis of sample building materials. have been examined, probable investigation, such as those that pose deterioration causes and underlying an imminent danger to public safety, From these observations and analyses, problems have been assessed, and should be secured immediately. Before the probable causes of deterioration any other work can proceed, loose, can be identified, whether caused by dislodged, or deteriorated building inappropriate design, construction, or materials must be held in place to past repairs; failure of building materi- prevent accidents. als; weathering; water infiltration; or other problems. Other problems, such as water infiltration into occupied space, can Failure to identify and treat the damage interior materials and finishes underlying causes of deterioration if not remedied quickly. Conditions that often results in their recurrence in the could contribute to further structural near future. For instance, re-anchored damage should in general face brick will break down prematurely be addressed as soon as possible. unless the material (steel, concrete, Determining the moisture content of clay, brick, etc.) and condition of its subsurface masonry is a frequently used Any stabilization measures, however, back-up are taken into consideration. investigative method that can help identify should dovetail with longer-range Moisture infiltration caused by improper the integrity of back-up materials. rehabilitation plans. Rather than 2 Volume 17 Number 1 increase costs of subsequent work or Creative Solutions cause more damage to the structure, these measures ought either to enhance or lay the groundwork for future Working with Regulations rehabilitative efforts. To illustrate, the During a recent rehabilitation project, Hoffmann Architects’ design team common practice of installing netting was faced with a badly deteriorated, eighty-year-old terra cotta cornice, to secure dangerously loose facade cantilevering three feet off the 14-story Taft Apartments, formerly the materials may be a good temporary fix renowned Taft Hotel, in New Haven, Connecticut. Deterioration included until a more permanent solution can open joints and severe corrosion of the embedded support steel. The be identified and implemented. If entire cornice had been netted, and numerous large pieces had fallen into improper anchorage is used, however, this protective barrier. the netting can fail. At the other extreme, removal may be sufficiently difficult As a historic landmark, the building was subject to restrictions from the city that further envelope damage is induced. commission on any rehabilitative work. But here, the cost of reconstructing the cornice as originally designed was prohibitive. Instead, the design team Timeline came up with a solution which satisfied both the commission and the With emergency needs met, other, owner’s budget: recreate the cornice, down to the last detail, using FRP less immediate — but equally impor- (fiber reinforced plastic). The required variances were obtained by the tant — problems can be addressed. project team on the owner’s behalf. If budgeting permits, it often makes economic sense to do all needed repairs at the same time. This both prevents damage to newly repaired sections during subsequent construc- tion, and avoids additional set-up costs. A partial re-pointing project may not be cost-effective if the remaining pointing has to be done within a few years, incurring a second round of set- up costs for scaffolding and sidewalk bridging or other protective measures. Also, disruption to tenants is kept to a minimum if they need endure only one construction period. It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time… Rehabilitation work on historic As the cost of repairing the ailing structures generally requires highly terra cotta cornice (inset) of this skilled hand labor and extensive set-up landmark building was well beyond time. Without detailed and exacting the project’s budget, the design construction documents, there is no team called for a replacement with more contemporary materials. assurance that the work laid out during the investigation will be done properly. 3 Hoffmann Architects / Journal Creative Solutions (continued) A Delicate Procedure Detailed, lucid construction documents are imperative, as Hoffmann Architects’ rehabilitation of one National Historic Register building illustrates. On the turn-of-the-century, Queen Anne-style Goodwin Hotel, in Hartford,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robert and Anne Dickey House Designation Report
    Landmarks Preservation Commission June 28, 2005, Designation List 365 LP-2166 ROBERT and ANNE DICKEY HOUSE, 67 Greenwich Street (aka 28-30 Trinity Place), Manhattan. Built 1809-10. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 19, Lot 11. On October 19, 2004, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Robert and Anne Dickey House and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing was continued to April 21, 2005 (Item No. 1). Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Sixteen people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of State Assemblyman Sheldon Silver, the Lower Manhattan Emergency Preservation Fund, Municipal Art Society of New York, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Historic Districts Council, and Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation. Two of the building’s owners, and five of their representatives, testified against designation. In addition, the Commission received numerous communications in support of designation, including a resolution from Manhattan Community Board 1 and letters from City Councilman Alan J. Gerson, the Northeast Office of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Preservation League of New York State, and architect Robert A.M. Stern. The building had been previously heard by the Commission on October 19, 1965, and November 17, 1965 (LP-0037). Summary The large (nearly 41 by 62 feet), significantly intact Federal style town house at No. 67 Greenwich Street in lower Manhattan was constructed in 1809-10 when this was the most fashionable neighborhood for New York’s social elite and wealthy merchant class.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation, Full Draft V. 3
    Inventing Architectural Identity: The Institutional Architecture of James Renwick, Jr., 1818-95 Nicholas Dominick Genau Amherst, New York BA, University of Virginia, 2006 MA, University of Virginia, 2009 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy McIntire Department of Art University of Virginia May, 2014 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ! ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1! An Architectural Eclectic:!! A Survey of the Career of James Renwick, Jr. .......................................................................................................................................................... 9! CHAPTER 2! “For the Dignity of Our Ancient and Glorious Catholic Name”:!! Renwick and Archbishop Hughes!at St. Patrick’s Cathedral .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aug24is95j NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM OHP
    INOUJ.WIICIJ. oe.LV.Lce AUG24IS95j NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM OHP 1. Name of Property historic name: Kimberly Crest other name/site .number: N/A 2. Location street & number: 1325 Prospect Drive not for publication: __ city/town: Redlands vicinity: _ state: CA county:San Bernardino code: 071 zip code: 92373 3. Classification Ownership of Property: Private Category of Property: Buildings Number of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing 2___ _____ buildings ___Llgarden)_____ sites ___2 (pergola's) 1 structures 2 (fountains)____obj ects ___7 1 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 Name of related multiple property listing: N/A request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _x_ meets ___ does nelr-meet the National Register Criteria. __ See continuation sheet. s ^/T^L <^2^ * ) -^>o^ Signatu rti/fyingy official Date California Office of Historic Preservation State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register criteria. __ See continuation sheet. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or/Federal agency and bureau 5. National Park Service Certification ereby certify that this property is entered in the National Register __ See continuation sheet, determined eligible for the •! r +.Tlft National Register National Register __ See continuation sheet, determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain): _____________ Signature of Keeper Date of Action 6.
    [Show full text]
  • State Historic Preservation Officer Certification the Evaluated Significance of This Property Within the State Is
    Form No. 10-300 . \Q''"" \frV DATA SHEET UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ NAME ISTORIC GEORGIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND/OR COMMON W. B. Hodgson Hall U^' LOCATION STREETS NUMBER 501 Whitaker Street _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Savannah _ VICINITY OF First STATE CODE COUNTY CODE GEORGIA ) 3 05^^ Chatham ^1-3— ^ 5~ / CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM X-BUILDING(S) ^.PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS ^-EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _JN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED 21 YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO -MILITARY ^OTHER: His t°rical goc^e^v OWNER OF PROPERTY Headquarters & Library NAME Georgia Historical Society STREET & NUMBER 501 Whitaker Street CITY. TOWN STATE Savannah __ VICINITY OF Georgia j LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS. ETC. chatham County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER Wright Square CITY, TOWN STATE Savannah Georgia 1 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic Savannah DATE 1968 —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY -xLOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Historic Savannah Foundation, Inc., 119 Habersham Street CITY. TOWN STATE Savannah Georgia DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE JiEXCELLENT —DETERIORATED -JUNALTERED J^.ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD —RUINS ALTERED __MOVED DATE _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Hodgson Hall was erected in 1874-1875 as a memorial to William Brown Hodgson, diplomat ai scholar, for the uses of the Georgia Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Upjohn and Richard Morris Hunt: the Evolution of Newport Domestic Architecture Caroline L
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Works 4-1-2012 Richard Upjohn and Richard Morris Hunt: The Evolution of Newport Domestic Architecture Caroline L. Peck Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Recommended Citation Peck, Caroline L., "Richard Upjohn and Richard Morris Hunt: The vE olution of Newport Domestic Architecture". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2012. Trinity College Digital Repository, http://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/200 Richard Upjohn and Richard Morris Hunt: The Evolution of Newport Domestic Architecture Caroline Peck Senior Art History Honors Thesis Professor Kathleen Curran May 2012 Peck 1 Introduction America’s largest and grandest home, the Biltmore (1890; figure 1), was commissioned by George Vanderbilt (1862-1914) to be built in Asheville, North Carolina. The house was designed by Richard Morris Hunt (1827-1895) and bears resemblance to three sixteenth century châteaux in the Loire Valley, France: Blois, Chenonceau, and Chambord. However, Biltmore was not the first of the Vanderbilt’s homes to replicate European designs and aesthetics from previous centuries. The most famous of these mansions were in Newport, and include Marble House (1888-1892; figure 2) and the Breakers (1893; figure 3), both designed by Hunt. Centuries after these homes were built in Newport, they continue to be synonymous with the wealth and decadence of Gilded Age Newport, and indeed, Gilded Age America. Hunt’s Newport legacy was based upon his work for the Vanderbilts, but his Newport career, perhaps surprising, began years before his work for this prominent family.
    [Show full text]
  • NOMINATION FORM Iiiiiiiimi
    Form No. 10-300 \&#*-, \0-1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC Lockwood-Mathews Mansion AND/OR COMMON Elmenworth, Elm Park LOCATION STREET* NUMBER 295 West Avenue —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Norwalk __ VICINITY OF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Connecticut Fairfield CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT XPUBLIC )LOCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE JCMUSEUM X-BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL _XPARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH X-WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED X-YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER: [OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME City of Norwalk Administered by Lockwood-Mathews Mansion^ Inc, STREET & NUMBER 295 West Avenue CITY. TOWN STATE Norwalk VICINITY OF Connecticut LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. City Hall STREET & NUMBER 41 NorthMain Street CITY, TOWN STATE Norwalk Connecticut REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT ^.DETERIORATED _UNALTERED X_ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD —RUINS 3LALTERED _MOVED DATE. —FAIR —UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Lockwood-Mathews Mansion is a huge asymmetrically massed two-and-one-half story granite structure of some 60 rooms. The house has the form of an irregular rectangle and is approximately 114 feet wide and 130 feet deep. When viewed in elevation, the mansion appears to have a Greek Cross plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Villas on the Hudson: an Architectural and Biographical Examination
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research Lehman College 1993 Villas on the Hudson: An Architectural and Biographical Examination Janet Butler Munch Lehman College, CUNY How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/le_pubs/229 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] AM E RICAN P U BLISHER S ' CIR CU LAR ======~~~~~====~==== nono L 1860. IN PRESS BY BOSTON TRADE SALE WI LL Cmnl[XCC WEDNESDAY MORNING, D. APPLETON &: COMPANY, ACGCST 1, 1800. r. I' r U l ~. m . W rn A T ,' .. n.ead k Co. ~:~ r-);. 'r ~':7:·: . ~~ ro ~ :~~,L ~~ ~ ~' ~" '\· ~ I . , •. \\" •• & (' 0 C ~ I 5 "" " 0. D.," rr "- Co. TI:I,.N "'1.I.,lr .. lr~ J,. I," \\' ,,~ ~ J ... "., ~L u""~, .... ":0. Coillo. '" IIr o: ~", 1,IIII ·, oI. II L•. ,r . TnE EBOXY IDO L. A :NOl' ti, wriUen by .. Lady of Sew r esiDed. C I• • k. -, "011". ~ Ior n •• d '" ""0 (; 1\ 1 ' ''I 'r ~1I C~ • • lr. :! ,' , . , f lO 4: <.: " II "" .. 1I "r 1:1' " 4: ~ 1 '''U '' '' O '''''C J H l ' l'i" h,oll oi Co LIFE OF 'IHLLI.U! T. PORTER, Ili te EJ itor of .. POtl er', Spirit of the ,., W OuJ" 11 1• .,, 10 . "1 ,\.1 .... Ap Jll r ~ . , .. .. ('D. J\ ~ "' . u. 4: Ti... eo . ~ J C.. G oI. l'. Mr , n . m. or II I' .. ,~, ,, n .. lI.alb" • •• J uhn t::Kch rJ' lry ( bll,i ...
    [Show full text]
  • Ridgewood North Historic District Designation Report
    Cover Photograph: Northwest side of Palmetto Street, Christopher D. Brazee, 2009. Ridgewood North Historic District Designation Report Prepared by Tara Harrison Edited by Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Map by Jennifer L. Most Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Pablo E. Vengoechea, Vice-Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Stephen F. Byrns Margery Perlmutter Diana Chapin Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Roberta Brandes Gratz Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS Ridgewood North Historic District Map ...................................................................... facing page 1 Testimony ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Boundary Description ....................................................................................................................... 1 Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Historical and Architectural Development of the Ridgewood North Historic District .................... 3 Findings and Designation ............................................................................................................... 22 BUILDING ENTRIES 66-02 to 66-08 Forest Avenue ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ROBERT and ANNE DICKEY HOUSE, 67 Greenwich Street (Aka 28-30 Trinity Place), Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission June 28, 2005, Designation List 365 LP-2166 ROBERT and ANNE DICKEY HOUSE, 67 Greenwich Street (aka 28-30 Trinity Place), Manhattan. Built 1809-10. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 19, Lot 11. On October 19, 2004, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Robert and Anne Dickey House and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing was continued to April 21, 2005 (Item No. 1). Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Sixteen people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of State Assemblyman Sheldon Silver, the Lower Manhattan Emergency Preservation Fund, Municipal Art Society of New York, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Historic Districts Council, and Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation. Two of the building’s owners, and five of their representatives, testified against designation. In addition, the Commission received numerous communications in support of designation, including a resolution from Manhattan Community Board 1 and letters from City Councilman Alan J. Gerson, the Northeast Office of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Preservation League of New York State, and architect Robert A.M. Stern. The building had been previously heard by the Commission on October 19, 1965, and November 17, 1965 (LP-0037). Summary The large (nearly 41 by 62 feet), significantly intact Federal style town house at No. 67 Greenwich Street in lower Manhattan was constructed in 1809-10 when this was the most fashionable neighborhood for New York’s social elite and wealthy merchant class.
    [Show full text]
  • DC Architects Biographies E
    DC Architects Directory Harry L. Edwards Biographical Data Birth: 1/15/1902 Place: Aaron, Florida Death:1/15/1958 Place: Washington, D.C. Family: Parents, William Edmonds and Nettie Bush Edwards; wife, Jane Tate; no children Education High School: McKinley Manual Training School, one year College: George Washington University, Evening School 1921-22 Graduate School: Atelier Cunningham, 1923-24, International Correspondence Schools Home Study, 1921-24 Apprenticeship: Office of Supervising Architect, 1921; James E. Cooper , 1922; John W. Kearney, 1923; Robert F. Beresford, 1924; Source: Washington Post. January 17, 1958 Joseph Younger, 1927 Architectural Practice DC Architects’ Registration Registration Number: 455 Date Issued: 11/2/1939 Permit Database Earliest Permit: 1925 Latest Permit: 1941 Total Permits: 29 Total Buildings: 121 Practice Position Date Harvey P. Baxter Associate Architect 1928-1934 Cafritz Construction Co. Architect 1935-1945 Aubinoe, Edwards and Beery Partner 1946-1958 Professional Associations American Institute of Architects Date(s) Enrolled: 7/10/1945 Fellow of the AIA: Other Societies or Memberships: Awards or Commissions: Washington Board of Trade awards for the Dupont Plaza Hotel, Dupont Circle, Abingdon Apartments, Arlington, Virginia, Wire Office Building, 1001 K Street, N.W. Buildings Building Types: Apartment buildings, garden apartments, residences, office buildings, hotel Styles and Forms: Colonial, Tudor and other revival styles, Art Deco, modernistic DC Work Locations: Connecticut and Massachusetts Avenues, American University Park, Downtown, Foggy Bottom, Greenway, suburban Maryland, Northern Virginia Notable Buildings Location Date Status Mass. Ave and Sheridan- Army and Navy Apartments 2540 Massachusetts Ave. NW 1925 Kalorama Historic Districts Hightowers 1530 16th Street, NW 1938 16 th Street Historic District The Majestic 3200 16th Street, NW 1937 NRHP DC Historic Site Greenway Minnesota Ave, Anacostia Rd, SE 1940-41 NRHP DC Historic Site Empire 2000 F St., NW 1939 NRHP DC Historic Site Edwards, Harry L.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1, Projectmgmtservices 3361.Doc Purchasing Department Finance Group
    Purchasing Department Finance Group October 30, 2013 The City of Norwalk (The City), is soliciting proposals from qualified Project Management firms to provide Project Management Services for the Norwalk Historical Commission and the Lockwood Mathews Mansion Museum Board and act as their Owner’s representative in the construction of ADA accessibility upgrades planned for the Lockwood Mathews Mansion Museum facility. Your firm has expressed interest in providing these services. Below are requirements which apply specifically to this project. These requirements are discussed in greater detail under Section 3 - General Information PROJECT # 3361 DEADLINE: 2:00PM November 20, 2013 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES – RE: ADA ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES – BATHROOMS + ENTRANCE RAMP + ELEVATOR – LOCKWOOD MATHEWS MANSION MUSEUM FACILITY PROJECT SITE 295 WEST AVENUE, NORWALK CT 06850 (RFP) Request for Proposal documents are available upon receipt of this invitation over the Internet at http://www.norwalkct.org Adobe Acrobat reader is required to view this document. If you do not have this software you may down load it for free from Adobe. A PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE will be held at 10:00am, Wednesday, November 6, 2013 meeting at the main entrance of Lockwood Mathews Mansion Museum, 295 West Avenue, Norwalk CT. A walk-through of the facility will follow the pre- proposal conference. All questions regarding this Request For Proposal (RFP) must be directed in writing to, Gerald J. Foley, Purchasing Agent, via e-mail at [email protected] or via fax number (203) 854-7817. The deadline for submission of questions is 2:00PM, Wednesday, November 13, 2013. Businesses without fax or Internet access equipment may contact the Purchasing Department at 203-854-7712 for any RFP information.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan
    Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan for Nine Historic Buildings Owned by the City of Norwalk, Connecticut Mathews Park Buildings: Lockwood-Mathews Mansion Museum Lockwood-Mathews Gate Lodge Lockwood-Mathews Carriage House Lockwood-Mathews Gardener’s Cottage Mill Hill Buildings: Norwalk Town House Governor Fitch Law Office Downtown District Schoolhouse Smith Street Buildings (at the Edge of Mill Hill): Old Jail Smith Street Barn John Milner Associates, Inc. June 2010 Table of Contents Introduction / General Information on the Buildings……………………………................ 5 The Buildings and the Two Parks They Occupy………………………………….. 5 Leasing Arrangements and How Repairs Are Handled…………………................ 7 Purposes of the Present Study……………………………………………………... 9 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………….. 12 Reports on Individual Buildings: Lockwood-Mathews Mansion: Building Profile/History/Current Use…………….….………….………... 14 Character-Defining Features Matrix……………….…………………….. 18 Systemic Analysis of Building Assembly and Conditions….……………. 21 Outline Condition Assessment………………………….………………... 24 Wall Drawing, Perimeter Plan, Site Plan………….…………………….... 25 Structural Engineer’s Report…………………….……………………….. 28 Recommendations…………….…………………………………………... 29 Lockwood-Mathews Gate Lodge: Building Profile/History/Current Use………………..………………….... 30 Character-Defining Features Matrix……………….…………………….. 33 Systemic Analysis of Building Assembly and Conditions…….…………. 36 Outline Condition Assessment………………………….………………... 38 Wall Drawing, Perimeter Plan, Site Plan………………………................
    [Show full text]