An Investigation of Laccase-Like Multicopper
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AN INVESTIGATION OF LACCASE-LIKE MULTICOPPER OXIDASES (LMCOs): STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION STUDIES By James Todd Hoopes (under the Direction of Jeffrey F. D. Dean) ABSTRACT This dissertation describes investigations into the structure and function of selected laccase-like multi-copper oxidases (LMCOs). A plant LMCO from Acer pseudoplatanus has been expressed in tobacco BY2 cell ands compared to the native LMCO isolated from Acer pseudoplatanus cell suspension cultures. It was found to be nearly identical to the native enzyme except with respect to the Kms for certain substrates. A LMCO gene cloned from yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) and expressed in transgenic tobacco cells showed ferroxidase activity. This marks the first report of ferroxidase activity associated with a plant LMCO, and suggests an alternative physiological function for these enzymes. Molecular modeling of the Fet3 LMCO gave insight into which amino acids could be involved in iron binding in LMCOs. Additionally, a new chromogenic substrate for laccases and peroxidases, 1,8-diaminonapthalene, was found to be more sensitive and less toxic than traditional substrates when used in SDS-PAGE zymograms. INDEX WORDS: Dissertation, Laccase, Multi-Copper Oxidase, MCO, Copper,Iron Metabolism, Ferroxidase, Lignin, Lignification, Liriodendron tulipifera, Acer pseudoplatanus AN INVESTIGATION OF LACCASE-LIKE MULTICOPPER OXIDASES (LMCOs): STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION STUDIES By James Todd Hoopes B.S. University of Georgia 1992 A Dissertation Submitted To The Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOROF PHILOSPHY. ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 iii © 2004 James Todd Hoopes All Rights Reserved iv AN INVESTIGATION OF LACCASE-LIKE MULTICOPPER OXIDASES (LMCOs): STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION STUDIES by James Todd Hoopes Major Professor: Jeffrey F.D.Dean Committee: Robert A. Scott Ronald C. Orlando Bi-Cheng Wang Zheng-Hua Ye Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2004 iv DEDICATION For my Father who gave me my love of science. For my Mother who fought for my education. v PREFACE Philosophy is nothing more than the persistent desire to think clearly. Would that man applied this practice to all his endeavors. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS page PREFACE......................................................................................................v CHAPTER (1) Introduction...................................................................................1 (2) Staining Electrophoretic Gels for Laccase and Peroxidase Activity Using 1,8-Diaminonaphthalene.........................................29 (3) Altered glycosylation of a LMCO from Acer pseudoplatanus expressed in suspension-cultured tobacco cells.............................49 (4) Ferroxidase Activity in a Laccase-like Multicopper Oxidase from Yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.)...........................................80 (5) Homology Modeling of the Fet3 Multicopper Oxidase Identifies Active Site Residues Likely Involved in Ferroxidase Activity...............104 (6) Conclusion/Discussion................................................................132 REFERENCES...........................................................................................135 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Nomenclature: The enzymatic reaction catalyzed by laccase (EC 1.10.3.2) is amongst the oldest studied biochemical activities and was first mentioned by Yoshida in 1883 (Yoshida, 1883). Around the same time, Bertrand did pioneering research on laccase isolated from Japanese lacquer tree sap (Bertrand, 1894, 1895), and in his descriptions coined the terms “laccase” and “oxidase” (Messerschmidt, 1997). As will be described in more detail below, similar enzymes have been found in a great many organisms and have been the subject of much study. However, for all the study, these enzymes remain quite mysterious with the exact physiological substrates and functions known only for the lacquer tree laccase and a handful of related enzymes (Omura, 1961; Askwith et al., 1994). Part of the problem stems from the broad range of substrates that laccases and related enzymes are capable of utilizing in vitro (Fahraeus and Ljunggren, 1961). This promiscuity created considerable difficulties for the identification and classification of these enzymes. Consequently, on the basis of 2 their oxidative activities, copper content and blue color, laccase, ascorbate oxidase and ceruloplasmin defined the early blue-copper oxidase enzyme family. As the name implies, blue-copper oxidase are characterized by their blue color caused by a strong absorbance band at approximately 600 nm related to the Type-1 copper center (Keilin and Mann, 1939). Traditionally, this group of enzymes was comprised of laccase, ascorbate oxidase, and ceruloplasmin, as well as cytochrome c oxidase and bilirubin oxidase, and more recently the yeast FET3 protein and hephaestin (Askwith et al., 1994; Conrad et al., 1999; Vulpe et al., 1999). Grouping these enzymes together, however, can be somewhat misleading. While ascorbate oxidase and laccase share a tremendous sequence and structural homology with each other, these enzymes share only small regions of similarity with ceruloplasmin and almost none at all with cytochrome c oxidase. As additional enzymatic activities were used to help define enzyme families, laccase, ascorbate oxidase, tyrosinase and catechol oxidase were grouped together as similar enzymes (phenoloxidases) that could be distinguished on the basis of their substrate and inhibitor specificities (Mayer and Harel, 1979). Thus, structurally distinct enzymes – laccases and catechol oxidases – were linked by their ability to remove protons from many of the same phenolic 3 compounds, although laccases were thought to be distinguishable by their ability to oxidize para-substituted substrates. Adding to the confusion, the name catechol oxidase was also used interchangeably with names such as polyphenoloxidase, tyrosinase, catecholase or cresolase, for enzymes derived from a wide variety of plant and microbial sources. For a brief period, even the IUPAC Enzyme Commission grouped these enzymes together under the classification number EC 1.14.18.1 (Mayer and Harel, 1979; Mayer, 1987). However, with increasing availability of phenoloxidases from diverse sources it soon became apparent that substrate and inhibitor studies could not provide clear-cut distinctions between the different classes of enzymes (Kahn and Andrawis, 1986; Walker and Ferrar, 1998). Much of this early ambiguity and imprecision in terminology is being removed by application of recently acquired structural information. Structurally, the enzymes placed in the original EC 1.14.18.1 category obviously comprised two distinct groups. Methane monooxygenase, tyrosinase and catechol oxidase are distinguished by a single binuclear copper center and no blue Type-1 coppers (Mayer et al., 1966; Sanchez-Ferrer et al., 1995). All of the copper ions in these enzymes are in Type-3 centers, which cycle from Cu2+ to Cu1+ and back during oxidation of the electron donor (Sanchez-Ferrer et al., 1995; McGuirl and Dooley, 1999). This is quite distinct from laccase, 4 ascorbate oxidase, and ceruloplasmin, which contain both Type-1 and Type-2 centers in addition to a Type-3 pair. Today, with the increasing availability of genomic sequence information, enzymes are most reliably assigned to families on the basis of their sequence similarity and structural properties, and only secondarily on their specific enzymatic activities. These new methods of classification highlight misleading classifications in the older nomenclature where implied similarities between enzymes based on activity provide no insight into mechanisms of catalysis or physiological function. Consequently, the nomenclature evolved so that group of enzymes originally referred to as the blue copper oxidases, was absorbed into the more general category of multicopper oxidases. Thus, besides classical blue-copper oxidases (laccase, ascorbate oxidase and ceruloplasmin), the multicopper oxidase family contains the yeast FET3 protein, tyrosinase, catechol oxidase, methane monooxygenase, sulochrin oxidase, dihydrogeodin oxidase, phenoxazinone synthase, and bilirubin oxidase (Askwith et al., 1994; Messerschmidt, 1997; McGuirl and Dooley, 1999). The members of this enzyme group are obviously diverse in function and in structure, requiring only two criteria for inclusion -- multiple copper ions in their catalytic centers and the ability to utilize diatomic oxygen as a co-substrate. The evolution of this category of enzymes and the characteristics that distinguish them have been 5 extensively review elsewhere (Mayer and Harel, 1979; Mayer, 1987; Messerschmidt, 1993; Solomon et al., 1996; Messerschmidt, 1997). Recent acquisition of large amounts of genomic sequence data has enabled identification of numerous genes that appear to encode enzymes bearing the structural hallmarks of laccases (Wojtas-Wasilewska and Trojanowski, 1975; Kurtz and Champe, 1981; Banerjee and Vohra, 1991; de Silva et al., 1995; Claus and Filip, 1997; Klomp et al., 1997; Eck et al., 1999; Fernandez et al., 1999; Syed et al., 2002; Wartmann et al., 2002). Sequence comparisons of these putative enzymes show them all to contain the invariant copper-binding domains that were first identified in laccase. Thus, to distinguish this group of structurally related enzymes from unrelated members of the blue-copper and multicopper oxidase