Zambian Presidential and Parliamentary Elections 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zambian Presidential and Parliamentary Elections 2016 ELECTION REPORT ✩ The Carter Center’s Experts Mission to the Zambian Presidential and Parliamentary Elections 2016 Final Report ELECTION REPORT ✩ The Carter Center’s Experts Mission to the Zambian Presidential and Parliamentary Elections 2016 Final Report One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5100 www.cartercenter.org Contents Foreword..................................... 3 Voter Registration ........................... 53 Executive Summary........................... 5 Conclusion ............................... 55 Overview .................................. 5 Civil Society ................................. 56 Summary of Key Findings ................... 7 Conclusion ............................... 57 Conclusion ............................... 13 Results ...................................... 58 Carter Center in Zambia ..................... 14 Referendum on the Bill of Rights ............. 61 Historical and Political Background........... 17 Conclusion .................................. 63 General Background, 2016 Recommendations........................... 65 General Elections .......................... 18 Recommendations to the Electoral System ............................. 19 Electoral Commission of Zambia ............ 65 Legal Framework ............................ 20 Recommendations to the Executive Branch ... 66 Electoral Constituencies...................... 23 Recommendations to Parliament ............ 67 Recommendations to the Candidates, the Campaign Period, Constitutional Court ....................... 67 and Parties .................................. 25 Recommendations to Security Forces ........ 67 Candidate Eligibility and Nomination ........ 25 Recommendations to Political Parties ........ 67 Establishment of a Level Playing Field ........ 28 Election-Related Violence .................. 32 Appendix A: Acknowledgments .............. 68 Election Management........................ 35 Appendix B: Carter Center Delegation and Staff ......................... 69 ECZ Composition and Functions ............ 35 Appendix C: Terms and Abbreviations ........ 70 Electoral Dispute Resolution ................. 45 Conflict Management Committees .......... 45 Appendix D: Electoral Results ................ 71 High Court of Zambia ...................... 46 Appendix E: Letter of Invitation to Observe ... 72 Constitutional Court of Zambia ............. 46 Appendix F: Mission Statements .............. 74 Conclusion ............................... 50 Voter Education ............................. 51 Conclusion ............................... 52 Foreword By Jordan Ryan the Center fielded a limited observation mission Vice President, Peace Programs deployed in-country for two months to focus on The Carter Center the pre- and postelection periods. Observation findings include assessment of the campaign Historically, Zambia stands out in Africa as period, electoral administration, women’s political enjoying generally competitive, multiparty, and participation, electoral violence, electoral dispute peaceful elections, with some alternation of resolution, and the legal framework for elections. power between ruling party and opposition party I was honored to co-lead the Carter Center’s winners. The country has held eight elections mission with Her Excellency Sylvie Kinigi, former since its first multiparty polls in 1991. While prime minister and acting president of Burundi. considerable shortcomings occurred in prior elec- As in past elections, domestic and international tions, The Carter Center shares the assessment of observers found that voting on election day was many stakeholders who cautioned that the 2016 largely peaceful and successful. While the Center’s elections signify a step backward for Zambian limited observation mission did not assess the democracy. Yet the Zambian people’s decades-long balloting and counting processes, it shares this commitment to the principles of democracy, the general assessment. The Electoral Commission of exercise of fundamental freedoms, and the coun- Election workers set Zambia and the electorate should be commended try’s democratic institutions, albeit challenged, up the polling place. provides the foundation to strengthen Zambian democracy and resist democratic retreat. The 2016 observation effort is part of the Center’s longstanding commitment to support Zambia’s democracy, which began with observa- Sarah Johnson tion of Zambia’s election in 1991 and continued with observation of the 2001 general elections. It is also part of the Center’s 25-year commitment to observing elections based on impartial and widely accepted international standards for democratic elections supported by all regions of the globe, including Africa. In this report, the Center summarizes its assessment of Zambia’s 2016 general election and referendum on the Bill of Rights. After receiving an invitation from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 3 for this success. The robust participation of civil associated with the electoral process that is deeply society organizations in the electoral process was troubling. The increasing political polarization in also impressive, with groups observing all aspects the country is also of deep concern. of the electoral process, including the overall Two weeks after the conclusion of the electoral administration and environment; the Constitutional Court’s consideration of opposition engagement of women, youth, and people with challenges to the polls, President Edgar Lungu disabilities; and the role of the media, among acknowledged the need to seek national unity; in other issues. his inaugural address he recalled Zambia’s national However, the constraints and flaws observed in motto — “One Zambia, One Nation”— and called the pre- and postelection periods detailed in this for citizens to “seize the opportunity to rise above report indicate a trend of anti-democratic practices the differences that divided” them during the that serve to significantly erode public and voter elections. While the elections were contentious and created substantial rancor between political opponents, actions can and should be taken to foster national unity and reinvigorate inclusive The Center calls on government officials, the democracy in Zambia. The Center calls on government officials, the Electoral Commission Electoral Commission of Zambia, political parties, of Zambia, political parties, and all other electoral and all other electoral stakeholders to give priority stakeholders to give priority to strengthening democratic institutions that oversee and support to strengthening democratic institutions that oversee the electoral process, including the Electoral and support the electoral process. Commission, the media, the security apparatus, and the judiciary. Likewise, we encourage these stakeholders to allow and embrace an increased role of women and civil society organizations to confidence in the electoral system and undermine participate in Zambia’s public affairs. the integrity of Zambia’s democratic institu- The Carter Center offers recommendations in tions. Key concerns include the lack of a level the spirit of supporting the government of Zambia, playing field for political parties, including serious the Electoral Commission, the Constitutional constraints on freedom of the press and assembly, Court, and other key electoral stakeholders gaps in the legal framework for elections, and charged with implementing the electoral process. the role of the judiciary in adjudicating electoral We hope the assessments shared here will help to disputes. The widely reported, though not always support and improve Zambia’s future elections, and verified, instances of violence, intimidation, we look forward to working with key stakeholders and role played by party cadres in these events to strengthen Zambia’s electoral processes. contributed to a climate of fear and insecurity 4 The Carter Center ✩ ELECTION REPORT Executive Summary Overview on the Bill of Rights and constitutional amend- ments at the same time. Widely reported incidents The Zambian general elections and referendum of violence increased tension, especially in the were held Aug. 11, 2016. Final presidential weeks preceding election day. In addition, the election results indicated that President Edgar Center noted the absence of a level playing field, Lungu received 50.35 percent of valid votes cast, including harassment of private media, the abuse a vote total that awarded him the presidency of public office by government ministers, and the and narrowly avoided a runoff election under application of the Public Order Act in ways that the newly adopted 50 percent plus one electoral appeared to disadvantage the main opposition system. The parliamentary elections resulted in party, the UPND. the Patriotic Front (PF) winning 80 seats, the While the Center did not observe election day, United Party for National Development (UPND) Zambian citizen observers and other international winning 58 seats, the Movement for Multi-party Democracy winning three seats, the Forum for Democracy and Development winning one seat, and independent candidates winning 14 seats. A referendum on a Bill of Rights and The preliminary statement released by the Center constitutional amendments held in parallel to the general elections did not meet the minimum on Aug. 13 found the pre-election period was threshold required by the constitution of 50 significantly flawed. percent participation by eligible voters, and so did not pass. Due to time and funding constraints, The election
Recommended publications
  • The Office of the Inspector General
    The Office of the Inspector General Country Audit of Global Fund Grants to Zambia Audit Report No: GF-OIG-09-15 Issue Date: 5 October 2010 Country Audit of Global Fund Grants to Zambia Table of contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 1 Summary of findings .................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 11 Ministry of Health ........................................................................................ 13 Background ............................................................................................... 13 Achievements and challenges ................................................................... 15 Strengthening grant management ............................................................. 16 Ministry of Finance and National Planning (MOFNP) ............................... 47 Background ............................................................................................... 47 Achievements and challenges ................................................................... 47 Strengthening Grant Management............................................................. 48 Zambia National AIDS Network .................................................................. 59 Background ............................................................................................... 59 Achievements and
    [Show full text]
  • CSEC Report on Zambia's 2011 Tripartite Elections
    CIVIL SOCIETY ELECTION COALITION (CSEC) 2011 CSEC Report on Zambia’s 2011 Tripartite Elections 20 September 2011 December 2011 CSEC Secretariat, c/o Caritas Zambia Plot 60 Kabulonga Road P. O. Box 31965, Lusaka Zambia ‘CSEC: Promoting transparent and credible elections through monitoring all stages of the 2011 electoral process in Zambia’ 1 FOREWORD Civil society in Zambia has a long history of contributinG to the democratic process throuGh a number of activities carried out by individual orGanisations. As the civil society in the country Geared up to be part of Zambia’s 2011 tripartite elections, the idea and viability of coming up with a coordinated and structured coalition such as CSEC 2011 was unforeseen until about May 2011. Eight (8) civil society orGanizations came toGether, believing in their unique capacities but also acknowledging the Great enerGy that would be realised if the orGanisations worked toGether. CSEC thus provided a unique experience of election monitoring. The CSEC experience has Gave the participatinG civil society orGanisations an opportunity to learn many lessons from the challenges and successes of working for a common purpose in a coalition. While the challenges that CSEC faced (limited time, limited resources and varying orGanisational cultures) made it a not so easy task, such challenges were not insurmountable. It was remarkable thouGh to note that partner orGanizations remained committed to the cause and hence the achievements that were realised by the coalition. For instance the contribution made to Zambia’s 2011 elections by CSEC’s Rapid Response Project (RRP) was just phenomenal. Amidst harassment, threats and denunciations arisinG from an ill informed debate on Parallel Vote Tabulation (PVT), CSEC was able to verify official election results using RRP as alternative concept to PVT.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia General Elections
    Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group ZAMBIA GENERAL ELECTIONS 20 September 2011 COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT Table of Contents Chapter 1 ................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 Terms of Reference ....................................................................................... 1 Activities ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 ................................................................................................... 3 POLITICAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................... 3 Early History ................................................................................................. 3 Colonial History of Zambia ............................................................................. 3 Post-Independence Politics ............................................................................ 3 2001 General Elections .................................................................................. 4 2006 General Elections .................................................................................. 5 The 2008 Presidential By-Election ................................................................... 5 Other Developments ...................................................................................... 5 Constitutional Review ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Iccf Group Brochure Ed
    THE ICCF GROUP BROCHURE ED. 2021-2022 INTERNATIONALCONSERVATION.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO ................................................................ 4 WORKING WITH LEGISLATURES ..................................................................... 8 • Caucuses We Support ................................. 10 • ICCF in the United States ................................ 12 • The ICCF Group in the United Kingdom ......................................................................................................... 31 • The ICCF Group in Latin America & the Caribbean ...................................................................................... 39 • The ICCF Group in Africa ............................ 63 • The ICCF Group in Southeast Asia ................ 93 WORKING WITH MINISTRIES ....................................................................... 103 MISSION THE MOST ADVANCED WE WORK HOW TO ADVANCE SOLUTION IN CONSERVATION CONSERVATION GOVERNANCE GOVERNANCE BY BUILDING 1. WE BUILD POLITICAL WILL POLITICAL WILL, The ICCF Group advances leadership in conservation by building political will among parliamentary PROVIDING and congressional leaders, and by supporting ministries in the management of protected areas. ON-THE-GROUND SOLUTIONS 2. CATALYZING CHANGE WITH KNOWLEDGE & EXPERTISE We support political will to conserve natural resources by catalyzing strategic partnerships and knowledge sharing between policymakers and our extensive network. VISION 3. TO PRESERVE THE WORLD'S MOST CRITICAL LANDSCAPES
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report
    Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 8 I. Structural Vulnerabilities ................................................................................................. 9 A. Political Factors.............................................................................................................. 9 B. Social Factors ............................................................................................................... 11 Table 1 .............................................................................................................................. 14 Composition of Members of Parliament by Gender since 1994 ....................................... 14 C. Economic Factors ......................................................................................................... 14 D. Security Factors............................................................................................................ 14 II. Vulnerabilities Specific to the 2011 Election ............................................................... 15 A. Electoral Administration .............................................................................................. 15 B. Parallel Vote Tabulation (PVT) ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authorities Review of Operations
    Republic of Zambia REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE REVIEW OF OPERATIONS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR THE FINANCIAL YEARS ENDED 31ST DECEMBER 2013, 2014 and 2015 Price: 60.00 REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE REVIEW OF OPERATIONS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR THE FINANCIAL YEARS ENDED 31ST DECEMBER 2013, 2014 and 2015 K60.00 REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL - REVIEW OF OPERATIONS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES Preamble Local Authorities are public institutions established by an Act of Parliament under Section 3 of the Local Government Act, Cap 281 of the Laws of Zambia and are Government institutions. The main objective of establishing Councils is to provide services on behalf of Central Government to residents within their areas of jurisdictions. Currently, there are one hundred and five (105) councils spread out in all the districts. In this regard, Local Authorities are a key factor in socio-economic development because their operations are directly linked to community activities. An effective monitoring of their operations is, therefore, inevitable in ensuring sustainable economic and environmental development in the country. The Constitution of Zambia Amendment Act No. 2 (2016) devolves powers to the Local Authorities (LA) in the quest to decentralize the operations of Government as all the Government departments and institutions will now be managed at the local authority level. This therefore, entails that there should be greater accountability on the part of the local authorities as they will now be responsible for a lot of government resources for onward service delivery to the general citizenry. In this regard, Article 250 (1) (i) of the Constitution of Zambia Amendment Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia's 2001 Elections: the Tyranny of Small Decisions, 'Non-Decisions
    Third World Quarterly, Vol 23, No 6, pp 1103–1120, 2002 Zambia’s 2001 elections: the tyranny of small decisions, ‘non-decisions’ and ‘not decisions’ PETER BURNELL ABSTRACT The course of the 1990s witnessed deterioration in the quality of elections held across sub-Saharan Africa. Zambia’s elections for the presidency, parliament and local government held on 27 December 2001 are no exception. They returned the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD) to power, but with much reduced popular support and leaving doubts about the legitimacy of the result. A ‘tyranny of small decisions’, ‘non-decisions’ and ‘not decisions’ perpetrated over 12 months or more leading up to these elections combined to influence the outcome. The previous MMD government and the formally autono- mous Electoral Commission were primarily but not wholly responsible. For independent analysts as well as for the political opposition, who secured a majority of parliamentary seats while narrowly failing to capture the presidency, identifying the relevant category of ‘decisions’ to which influences belong and comparing their impact is no straightforward matter. Zambia both illustrates the claim that ‘administrative problems are typically the basis of the flawed elections’ in new democracies and refines it by showing the difficulty of clearly separating the administrative and political factors. In contrast Zimbabwe’s presi- dential election in March 2002, which had the Zambian experience to learn from, appears a more clear-cut case of deliberate political mischief by the ruling party. There is little doubt that in the course of the 1990s the quality of Africa’s elections went into decline.
    [Show full text]
  • PROFESSOR NKANDU LUO BRIEF INTRODUCTION on May 17, President Lungu Officially Appointed Prof
    Meet PROFESSOR NKANDU LUO BRIEF INTRODUCTION On May 17, President Lungu officially appointed Prof. Nkandu Luo as his running mate. During the announcement, President Lungu said, “there´s no shred of doubt within me that Professor Nkandu Luo is the right choice for my running mate, and that we are going to make a great team in our journey towards August 12 and beyond.” Here are a few things to know about the Professor. FAMILY LIFE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS Professor Nkandu Luo was born on 21 She attended the Dominican Convent and December 1951 at Lubwa mission in Chinsali Roma Girls Secondary schools in Lusaka. District. Her parents were both teachers. She holds a Certificate in Immunology, a She has 5 surviving (sisters) siblings. She Certificate in Epidemiology and Medical is a proud mother of two sons and four Statistics, and a Certificate in Flow Cytometry. grandchildren, who she adores dearly. She Further, she has a Master’s degree in is close to her sisters and her caring nature Microbiology, another Master’s degree in allows her to create time for the extended Immunology, a PhD in Immunology and family and friends. Immunopathology of Infectious Diseases. She is currently pursuing post-doctorate research in Public Health with a focus on determinants of early marriage. She speaks fluent English and Russian, has been exposed to French, German and Japanese. AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIP 1993 First woman professor in Zambia 1993 Presidential award; For her contribution to HIV and AIDS fight. Awarded by the President of the Republic of Zambia. H.E. Mr. F.T.J.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Public\Documents\GP JOBS\Gazette No. 73 of Friday, 16Th
    REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA Price: K5 net Annual Subscription: Within Lusaka—K200.00 Published by Authority Outside Lusaka—K230.00 No. 6430] Lusaka, Friday, 16th October, 2015 [Vol. LI, No. 73 GAZETTE NOTICE NO. 643 OF 2015 [5929855/13 Zambia Information and Communications Technologies Authority The Information and Communications Technologies Act, 2009 (Act No. 15 of 2009) Notice of Determination of Unserved and Underserved Areas Section 70 (2) of the Information and Communication TechnologiesAct No. 15 of 2009 (ICTAct) empowers the Zambia Information and Communications Technology Authority (ZICTA) to determine a system to promote the widespread availability and usage of electronic communications networks and services throughout Zambia by encouraging the installation of electronic communications networks and the provision for electronic communications services in unserved and underserved areas and communities. Further, Regulation 5 (2) of Statutory Instrument No. 38 of 2012 the Information and Communications Technologies (Universal Access) Regulations 2012 mandates the Authority to designate areas as universal service areas by notice in the gazette. In accordance with the said regulations, the Authority hereby notifies members of the public that areas contained in the Schedule Hereto are hereby designated as universal service areas. M. K. C. MUDENDA (MRS.) Director General SN Site Name Longtitude Latitude Elevation Province 1 Nalusanga_Chunga Headquarter Offices 27.22415 -15.22135 1162 Central 2 Mpusu_KankamoHill 27.03507 -14.45675 1206 Central
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia 2013 Human Rights Report
    ZAMBIA 2013 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Zambia is a constitutional republic governed by a democratically elected president and a unicameral national assembly. International and local observers considered national elections held in 2011 to be generally free and fair. Security forces reported to civilian authorities. Serious human rights abuses occurred during the year. The most important were abuses by security forces, including reports of unlawful killings, torture, and beatings; life-threatening prison conditions; and restrictions on freedom of speech, assembly, and association. Other serious human rights problems included arbitrary arrest, prolonged pretrial detention, arbitrary interference with privacy, government corruption, violence and discrimination against women, child abuse, trafficking in persons, discrimination against persons with disabilities and members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community, restrictions on labor rights, forced labor, and child labor. The government took limited steps to prosecute officials suspected of corruption or human rights abuses during the year; however, impunity remained a problem. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were several reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. After local police authorities were unable to apprehend three men suspected of several killings, the government directed the military to use deadly force against the suspects. On June 25, after a much-publicized investigation into the killings, army soldiers killed Mika, Fabian, and Stefan Mailoni in Mkushi District. The Human Rights Commission (HRC) criticized the killings. On June 14, soldiers belonging to the Zambia National Service shot and killed unarmed civilians Clement Muloongo and Pumulo Lungwangwa in Kampasa village during a scuffle over land rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya - Caucus Parliamentary Parliamentary National Assembly of Kenya National Assembly Hon
    AFRICA 2019-2020 THE ICCF GROUP INTERNATIONALCONSERVATION.ORG COPYRIGHT INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION MISSION THE MOST ADVANCED TO ADVANCE SOLUTION IN CONSERVATION CONSERVATION GOVERNANCE BY WE BUILD POLITICAL WILL BUILDING The ICCF Group advances governments' leadership in conservation internationally by building political will POLITICAL WILL, within legislatures and supporting governments in the management of protected areas. PROVIDING ON-THE-GROUND CATALYZING CHANGE WITH KNOWLEDGE & EXPERTISE SOLUTIONS The ICCF Group supports political will by catalyzing strategic partnerships and knowledge sharing between policymakers and our extensive network. VISION TO PRESERVE THE WORLD'S MOST CRITICAL LANDSCAPES A WORLD The ICCF Group's international track record in legislative outcomes, public-private partnerships, & land WHERE management demonstrates that our unique model is emerging as a cost-effective, sustainable solution to PEOPLE AND conservation governance challenges. NATURE SUSTAIN AND NURTURE ONE ANOTHER 2019-2020 THE ICCF GROUP THE ICCF GROUP IN AFRICA EMPOWERING POLICYMAKERS &AND THE JUDICIARY The ICCF Group is working in East, Southern, and Central Africa to foster political will for conservation and support the sustainable management of natural resources. The ICCF Group has facilitated the establishment of parliamentary conservation caucuses in ten countries and is collaborating with each of these coalitions of policymakers to strengthen governance across several key natural resource sectors. The ICCF Group coordinates high-level political engagement with expertise on conservation strategies and solutions; facilitates interactions between U.S. and international policymakers, conservation organizations, and government agencies; and seeks to leverage and integrate resources in support of sustainable natural resource management policies. ICCF-supported caucuses enable, inform, and strengthen policymakers in their commitment to conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Project
    STRENGTHENING EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE – UP (STEP-UP) ZAMBIA PROJECT QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FY 2014 Q3: APRIL 1 – JUNE 30, 2014 Contract No. AID-611-C-12-00001 JULY 31, 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Cover photo: A Grade One learner demonstrates her literacy skills in front of provincial and district educational officers at the provincial launch of the Let’s Read Zambia campaign in Southern Province. Though she is a Grade One student, she is able to read from a Grade Two textbook. STEP-UP ZAMBIA FY2014 Q3 PROGRESS REPORT ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2 A. INTEGRATE AND STRENGTHEN SYSTEMS FOR IMPROVED DECISION-MAKING (TASK 1) 6 B. PROMOTE EQUITY AS A CENTRAL THEME IN POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION (TASK 2) 9 C. INSTITUTIONALIZE THE MESVTEE’S MANAGEMENT OF HIV AND AIDS WORKPLACE POLICIES (TASK 3) 9 D. STRENGTHEN DECENTRALIZATION FOR IMPROVED LEARNER PERFORMANCE (TASK 4) 15 E. ENGAGE ZAMBIAN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE MESVTEE POLICY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS (TASK 5) 24 F. MANAGEMENT, MONITORING, AND EVALUATION 28 III. GOALS FOR NEXT QUARTER 30 ANNEX A: SUCCESS STORY 32 ANNEX B: STATUS OF M&E INDICATORS 35 ANNEX C: ACTIVE DATA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES 39 STEP-UP ZAMBIA FY2014 Q3 PROGRESS REPORT iii
    [Show full text]