Diphosphate (Ppgpp) in Plants
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Identification of the bacterial alarmone guanosine 5-diphosphate 3-diphosphate (ppGpp) in plants Kosaku Takahashi, Koji Kasai, and Kozo Ochi* National Food Research Institute, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8642, Japan Edited by Frederick M. Ausubel, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and approved January 30, 2004 (received for review December 22, 2003) Stringent control mediated by the bacterial alarmone guanosine Tris-acetate-phosphate medium at 25°C under continuous white .(5-diphosphate 3-diphosphate (ppGpp) is a key regulatory process fluorescent light with rotary shaking (8 governing bacterial gene expression. By devising a system to measure ppGpp in plants, we have been able to identify ppGpp in Abiotic Treatments. Plants were wounded by cutting the shoots a the chloroplasts of plant cells. Levels of ppGpp increased markedly small interval with a knife. Treatment with salt, acid, alkali, or when plants were subjected to such biotic and abiotic stresses as heavy metal entailed transplantation to an aqueous solution of wounding, heat shock, high salinity, acidity, heavy metal, drought, NaCl (250 mM), HCl (pH 3.0), NaOH (pH 10.0), or CuSO4 (1 and UV irradiation. Abrupt changes from light to dark also caused mM), respectively. For heat and cold treatment, temperature a substantial elevation in ppGpp levels. In vitro, chloroplast RNA was shifted from 25 to 40 or 10°C. Plants were dehydrated by polymerase activity was inhibited in the presence of ppGpp, removing them from the soil and allowing them to dry at 25°C Ͻ demonstrating the existence of a bacteria-type stringent response with humidity of 20%. For UV irradiation, plants were ex- in plants. Elevation of ppGpp levels was elicited also by treatment posed to UV light (predominantly 254 nm) from a distance of 15 with plant hormones jasmonic acid, abscisic acid, and ethylene, but cm by using a germicidal lamp (15 W, National, Osaka). To treat these effects were blocked completely by another plant hormone, them with plant hormones, plants were floated on an aqueous Ϯ indole-3-acetic acid. On the basis of these findings, we propose solution containing 0.3 mM ( )-jasmonic acid (Sigma–Aldrich), ethephon (an ethylene generator, Wako Pure Chemical), or that ppGpp plays a critical role in systemic plant signaling in Ϯ response to environmental stresses, contributing to the adaptation ( )-abscisic acid (Sigma–Aldrich). Indole-3-acetic acid (Sigma– of plants to environmental changes. Aldrich) was added at a concentration of 0.1 mM. Plants were subjected to stress or hormone treatments for Ϸ1 or 2 h unless indicated otherwise. he ability of organisms to survive under a wide range of Tadverse environmental conditions depends on diverse mo- ppGpp and Guanosine 5-Triphosphate 3-Diphosphate Analysis. To lecular mechanisms that adjust patterns of gene expression to the analyze levels of ppGpp and guanosine 5Ј-triphosphate 3Ј- changing environment. In bacteria, one of the most important diphosphate (pppGpp) in plants, shoots (20 g) from each plant processes regulating gene expression is ‘‘stringent control,’’ to be tested were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, crushed, which enables cells to adapt to nutrient-limiting conditions (1). and extracted with 100 ml of 2 M HCOOH for1hat4°C. After The effector molecule of stringent control, called an alarmone, removing cell debris by centrifugation (10,000 ϫ g, 10 min) and is a hyperphosphorylated guanosine nucleotide, guanosine 5Ј- filtration, water was added to the extract to give a final volume diphosphate 3Ј-diphosphate (ppGpp), which binds to the core of 200 ml. This solution then was extracted further with 200 ml RNA polymerase, eventually leading to activation or repression of water-saturated n-BuOH. For C. reinhardtii, 3.1 g of cells were of gene expression. Ribosome-dependent ppGpp synthesis is collected by centrifugation (6,000 ϫ g, 10 min), soaked in 20 ml catalyzed by the relA gene product ppGpp synthetase (also called of 2 M HCOOH, and sonicated for 5 min. After removing the stringent factor), which is expressed in response to the binding cell debris by centrifugation (8,000 ϫ g, 10 min), the supernatant of uncharged tRNA to the ribosomal A site (1). Likewise, plants was extracted with 20 ml of water-saturated n-BuOH. The water have a complex signal transduction network activated in re- layer was applied immediately to an epichlorohydrin triethanol- Ϫ sponse to such stressful conditions as pathogenic infection, amine (ECTEOLA) cellulose column (10 ml, HCOO form, wounding, heat shock, drought, and high salinity (2, 3). Plant Wako Pure Chemical), previously equilibrated with 1 M ͞ hormones such as ethylene, jasmonic acid, and abscisic acid HCOOH, and eluted with 100 ml of 0.3 M HCOOH 0.3 M HCOONH4 followed by 30 ml of 2 M HCOONH4. The second occupy critical positions in this signal transduction network ϩ (4–7), although details on their molecular mechanisms remain effluent was charged onto Dowex 50W (50 ml, H form, unknown. Despite the apparent significance of ppGpp in bac- Sigma–Aldrich), previously equilibrated with water, washed with terial gene expression, its importance in plant biology has been 50 ml of water, and then lyophilized. The resultant residue first largely overlooked. By devising a system to measure small was dissolved in 4 ml of water and then extracted several times with an excess of n-BuOH to remove the water. The resultant amounts of ppGpp precisely, however, we have been able to Ϸ demonstrate unambiguously that ppGpp is produced in the concentrated solution ( 300 l) was mixed with 40 l of MeOH chloroplasts of plant cells in response to stressful conditions. (to make the solution clear) and water to give a final volume of 400 l. All procedures described above were carried out in a cold Materials and Methods room (4°C). To assay ppGpp, a portion (200 l) of the extract solution was Plant Seedlings and Green Algae. Pea, wheat, spinach, and rice subjected to HPLC (L-7000, Hitachi, Tokyo) by using a Partisil seeds were grown on moist vermiculite at 25°C under white fluorescent light (12 h of light per day) for 3 weeks. In addition, Arabidopsis thaliana was grown for 6 weeks under the same This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office. conditions. Tobacco was grown on half-strength Murashige and Abbreviations: ppGpp, guanosine 5Ј-diphosphate 3Ј-diphosphate; pppGpp, guanosine Skoog medium containing 3% sucrose and 0.3% Gelrite (Wako 5Ј-triphosphate 3Ј-diphosphate. Pure Chemical, Osaka) in a growth chamber at 25°C for 4 weeks. *To whom correspondence should be addressed at: National Food Research Institute, ϩ Chlamydomonas reinhardtii TW3 strain (thi10 cw15 mt ), which 2-1-12 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8642, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]. harbors the cell-wall deficiency mutation cw15, was cultured in © 2004 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA 4320–4324 ͉ PNAS ͉ March 23, 2004 ͉ vol. 101 ͉ no. 12 www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0308555101 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 SAX-10 column (4.6 ϫ 250 mm, Whatman). The nucleotides were eluted at a flow rate of 1 ml͞min by using a gradient made up of low (7 mM KH2PO4, adjusted to pH 4.0 with H3PO4) and high (0.5 M KH2PO4 plus 0.5 M Na2SO4, adjusted to pH 5.4 with KOH) ionic strength buffers. The proportion of the high ionic strength buffer was increased for 20 min from 0% to 100% and then maintained for 25 min at 100%. When assaying pppGpp, we used the same high ionic strength buffer but adjusted the pH to 4.0; pppGpp was eluted at 44 min. The recovery of ppGpp and pppGpp throughout the process was 20%, as estimated from results using standard ppGpp and pppGpp (purity Ͼ98%), which were prepared enzymatically in our laboratory by using Strep- tomyces morookaensis. Analysis of ppGpp in Chloroplasts. Intact chloroplasts were isolated from untreated and wounded pea plants (150 g) in a cold room (4°C) by using the method of Perry et al. (9), after which the chloroplasts (300 mg) were soaked in 10 ml of 2 M HCOOH and then sonicated for 5 min. This solution then was extracted first with 10 ml of phenol saturated with water and then with 10 ml of chloroform. The water layer was freeze-dried, and the residue was then dissolved in 4 ml of water and concentrated by using an excess of n-BuOH. The resultant concentrate was used for ppGpp analysis. The recovery of ppGpp in this process was 80%, as estimated by using standard ppGpp. RNA Polymerase Assay. Intact chloroplasts were prepared from pea plants (9). Purification of the DNA–protein complex for the RNA polymerase assay was done according to the method of Briat et al. (10). The DNA–protein complex (Ϸ5–10 g) was suspended in 20 l of buffer containing 50 mM Tris⅐HCl (pH ͞ ͞ ͞ 7.6) 10 mM (NH4)2SO4 40 mM 2-mercaptoethanol 4mM EDTA͞25% glycerol͞0.1% Triton X-100 and then incubated at 30°Cfor1hinthepresence of 30 l of buffer containing 50 mM ⅐ ͞ ͞ ͞ ͞ Tris HCl (pH 7.9) 10 mM MgCl2 0.2 mM ATP 0.2 mM GTP 0.2 mM CTP͞0.2 mM [3H]UTP [2 Ci͞100 l(1Ciϭ 37 GBq)]͞50 mM KCl. After running the reaction for the indicated times, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 30 lof1% sodium dodecylsulfate solution containing 50 mM sodium py- rophosphate. An aliquot (25 l) was deposited on a DE81 DEAE cellulose filter (Whatman), and nucleotide triphosphates not incorporated into RNA were removed by washing the filter six times with 5% Na2HPO4, twice in water, and finally once in 99% ethanol.