DOCSLIB.ORG

Gun-Grabbers Go Full Femme-A-Gogue in Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gun-Grabbers Go Full Femme-A-Gogue in Colorado Gun-Grabbers Go Full Femme-a- Gogue in Colorado COLORADO SPRINGS — Out: The boy who cried wolf. In: The girl who cried birth control. Desperate Democrats are imposing false-alarm feminist politics on a high-stakes recall election in Colorado this month. It’s a golden opportunity for independent-minded women to reject empty femme-a-goguery and tear up the Sandra Fluke card. On September 10, Colorado Springs and Pueblo will decide whether to boot two top state Democrats (state Senate Majority Leader John Morse and state Sen. Angela Giron) over their support for radical gun- and ammo-control measures spearheaded by outside special interests. Left-wing billionaires Michael Bloomberg of New York City and Eli Broad of Detroit have poured $700,000 between them into defending the endangered Colorado Democrats. A whiff of elitist progressive panic is polluting the Rocky Mountain air. Polls show "moderate" Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper, who was against anti-Second Amendment gesture theater before he was for it, losing favor here. The libs’ gun-control laws (including more intrusive background checks and ammo mag limits) have driven manufacturing jobs away, made it more difficult for law-abiding gun-owners to conduct business, and done little to increase public safety. No wonder Hickenlooper has barely lifted one of his wavering, wet fingers in the wind to assist the recall targets. Extremist liberal groups are filling the vacuum. They’re trotting out ridiculous fear-mongers to demonize Morse’s GOP challenger Bernie Herpin and Giron’s challenger George Rivera as misogynistic zealots hell-bent on confiscating every condom, morning-after pill and key to an abortion clinic in the Pikes Peak region. Exhale. Consider the newly formed 527 political action group "We Can Do Better, Colorado," which put out ominous mailers and TV ads created by a Chicago-based firm. The spots are narrated by an angst-filled female who asks: "What would you call someone who supports a ban on common forms of birth control? Interferes with our personal decisions?" … "Someone who supports a plan that could even allow police to investigate miscarriages and question the grieving woman like a criminal?" The narrator frets that if birth control warriors don’t rise up against the Neanderthals, they might soon be calling Herpin and Rivera "state senators." Gasp! The Republican challengers appear in the ads as shadowy threats in black-and-white photos. All that’s missing are the wire hangers. Locals here also report that their college-age children are receiving push calls zeroing in on GOP opposition to taxpayer- subsidized birth control, abortion and the so-called Personhood amendment — none of which sparked the recall in the first place and are not at issue in the special elections. The reality? Both Herpin and Rivera are pro-life, mainstream Republicans focused on increasing economic opportunity and government accountability. Their recall campaigns have zeroed in on the control freak Democrats’ underhanded subversion of transparency and the deliberative process during their gun- control hearings. The true misogynists are Morse, Giron and their Bloomberg- bolstered gang who shut out Colorado citizens, disparaged Second Amendment-supporting rape victims and female concealed- carry permit holders, and cut off the testimony of countless sheriffs who opposed the sovereignty-infringing gun-control measures. Women voters here and across the country should not forget that these Nanny Staters told grandmothers, mothers and daughters last spring that they don’t need handguns to defend themselves, because "rape whistles," "call boxes" and "ballpoint pens" are sufficient. The gun-grabbing femme-a-gogues think they can do what they did to Colorado U.S. Senate candidate Ken Buck in 2010: hammer the GOP into submission and defeat over their phony "reproductive rights" agenda. Enough. "Our bodies, our choice" does not just apply to abortion and birth control. It applies to every woman’s right to defend herself as she sees fit. The Dems’ presumptuous paternalism aims to keep independent women both physically and intellectually disarmed. I say: Think and act with your lady smarts, not your lady parts. Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies" (Regnery 2010). Her e-mail address is [email protected]. COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guns, Grass, and God's Wrath, Colorado's Budget, Politics, and Elections
    Guns, Grass, and God’s Wrath, Colorado’s Budget, Politics, and Elections Michael J. Berry University of Colorado, Denver I. Introduction At the 2014 Democratic Party Assembly, incumbent Governor John Hickenlooper lamented that no “other state in the union . has been through as much as Colorado has in the past couple of years.” His statement was an implicit reference to a number of recent tragedies in the state. Among the most prominent were the 2012 Aurora movie theater shooting, the callous murder of Department of Corrections director Tom Clements in his home in early 2013, and the most dev- astating forest fires and floods to ever hit the state in June and September 2013. Hickenlooper’s statement on the uniqueness of the state, however, could just as easily apply to the state’s politi- cal realm. Colorado received considerable notoriety from the commencement of recreational marijuana sales on January 1, 2014. In a carefully staged photo opportunity, Iraq war veteran, Sean Azzariti, made the first legal recreational marijuana purchase as the state embarked on a grand social ex- periment. The prior year witnessed the first recall elections in state history resulting in the re- moval of two Democratic legislators from office including Senate President John Morse. An ad- ditional state senator facing a strong recall effort resigned under pressure. These highly charged campaigns to remove legislators were in response to the enactment of several controversial gun control laws. The legalization of recreational marijuana and the fight over gun control grabbed the lion’s share of headlines in the state over the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corrosive Effect of Recall Elections on State Legislative Politics Zachary J
    86.1 SIEGEL_FINAL (DO NOT DELETE) 11/14/2014 11:01 AM RECALL ME MAYBE? THE CORROSIVE EFFECT OF RECALL ELECTIONS ON STATE LEGISLATIVE POLITICS ZACHARY J. SIEGEL* For the first time in Colorado’s 137-year history, voters in two districts recalled their state senators from office in September 2013. Although the event prompted significant debate over the controversial gun legislation that sparked the grassroots efforts to trigger the recall elections, discussion generally overlooked the implications of using political recall altogether—implications that concern the very foundation of American democracy: the role of the legislator. This Comment aims to fill that gap, examining politically motivated recalls in the context of state legislatures. Using the recent Colorado examples as a case study, this Comment argues that increased use of the tactic will shake the foundation of state legislative politics. By forcing legislators to consider the chance that they might be recalled after voting on any controversial issue, the tactic upsets the delicate balance between a legislator’s ideal dual-role as a delegate and trustee, thereby distorting legislative decision- making. Additionally, increased use of political recall threatens to create a literal manifestation of the “permanent campaign,” and disproportionately advantage special interest and national groups in state politics. Seeking to address the problems associated with the increased use of this dangerous tactic, this Comment presents three policy recommendations. Two of the recommendations are aimed at preventing politically * J.D. Candidate, 2015, University of Colorado Law School; Executive Editor, University of Colorado Law Review. I would like to thank Carey DeGenaro, Elizabeth Sullivan, Cayla Crisp, Andrew Gomez, Cassady Adams, Alex Haynes, Shannon Kerr, Vanya Akraboff, and Vikrama Chandrashekar for their thoughtful edits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Endorsements Are Based on the Support of Fire Fighter
    2010 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTER ENDORSEMENTS U.S. Senate Michael Bennet U.S. House of Representa1ves Diana DeGe.e (D) CD1 Kevin Bradley (D) CD5 Jared Polis (D) CD2 John Flerlage (D) CD6 John Salazar (D) CD3 Ed Perlmu.er (D) CD7 Betsey Markey (D) CD4 Governor John Hickenlooper Aorney General Stan Garne. Treasurer Cary Kennedy Secretary of State Bernie Buescher Amendment 60, 61, 101 Oppose The following endorsements are based on the support of fire fighter issues in Colorado. Endorsed candidates voted for fire fighter presumptive cancer and/ or fire fighter collective bargaining. New candidates have committed to voting for fire fighter collective bargaining. State Senate Gloria Stultz (D) SD2 John Morse (D) SD11 Lois Tochtrop (D) SD24 Angela Giron (D) SD3 Ken Storck (D) SD13 Patrick Steadman (D) SD31 Gail Schwartz (D) SD5 Rich Ball (D) SD15 Chris Romer (D) SD32 Bruce Whitehead (D) SD6 Jeanne Nicholson (D) SD16 Michael Johnston (D) SD33 Claude.e Konola (D) SD7 Cheri Jahn (D) SD20 Lucia Guzman (D) SD34 StateHouse Jeanne Labuda (D) HD1 Pete Lee (D) HD18 David Balmer (R) HD39 Mark Ferrandino (D) HD2 Chris Radeff (D) HD22 Nancy Todd (D) HD41 Daniel Kagan (D) HD3 Max Tyler (D) HD23 Rhonda Fields (D) HD42 Dan Pabon (D) HD4 Sue Schafer (D) HD24 Gary Semro (D) HD43 Crisanta Duran (D) HD5 Andy Kerr (D) HD26 Sal Pace (D) HD46 Lois Court (D) HD6 Sara Gagliardi (D) HD27 Carole Par[n (D) HD47 Angela Williams (D) HD7 Steve Harvey (D) HD28 Karen Stockley (D) HD49 Beth McCann (D) HD8 Debbie Benefield (D) HD29 Jim Reisberg (D) HD50 Joe Miklosi (D) HD9 Laura Huerta (D) HD30 Bill McCreary (D) HD51 D.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Legislative Session: Moderation in All Things?
    Jump to CACI Policy Positions on 2014 Legislation The 2014 Legislative Session: Moderation in all Things? By Loren Furman, Senior Vice President, State & Federal Government Relations and Dan Pilcher, Executive Vice President and COO The phrase, "Moderation in all Things," is a common extrapolation of Aristotle's “Doctrine of the Mean” or finding middle ground. The 2014 Session can be viewed by CACI as an example of this common saying and was evident with the passage of bills that involved months of dialogue between the parties and were resolved through fair and meaningful compromise. The session also had its fair share of bad-for-business bills, however, CACI and its allies lobbied against those bills which were successfully killed on the vine. The 2014 Session was a stark comparison to the 2013 Session where political conflict was the daily entrée at the State Capitol, and controversial issues dominated the debates. Each session is like a football game, depending on which party controls which chamber or chambers—and, most critically, by how many votes. And, this session’s football game had plenty of maneuvers and strategic plays as we had anticipated. Historical Context for the 2014 Session: First, however, a little historical perspective may be helpful to understand the 2014 session. In terms of outcomes, the 2014 session was more like the 2011 and 2012 sessions when the Republicans controlled the House and the Democrats controlled the Senate. But the reason for the similarity was very different. Many Capitol Dome observers saw the 2011 legislative reapportionment as mainly benefiting the Democrats, who had the lion’s share of influence over the reapportionment process.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO 2013-2014 Prayer Calendar [email protected] Dan File, State Director
    COLORADO 2013-2014 Prayer Calendar [email protected] Dan File, State Director Legislative Rep. Doug Lamborn CO State Senate Leadership Colorado Senate Executive Rep. Mike Coffman Sen. Gail Schwartz *Sen. Kent Lambert US Congress Rep. Ed Perlmutter Senate Pres. John Morse *Sen. Greg Brophy Sen. Ellen Roberts Sen. Owen Hill President Barack Obama Senator Michael Bennet Sen Pres. Pro Tem.Guzman *Sen. Kevin Grantham Sen. Steve King Sen. John P. Morse Vice Pres. Joe Biden Senator Mark Udall CO State Leadership Sen Maj Ldr.M Carroll Sen. Angela Giron *Sen.Randy Baumgardner *Sen. Bill Cadman CO State Leadership Rep. Diana DeGette Sec. of State Gessler *Sen. Min. Ldr. Cadman *Sen. Mark Sheffel Governor Hickenlooper Rep. Jared Polis Treasurer Stapleton Lt. Governor Garcia Rep. Scott Tipton Attorney General Suthers Senate Staff *Rep. Cory Gardner CO State Representative *Sen. Scott Renfroe Sen. Matt Jones Sen. Jessie Ulibarri Sen. Mary Hodge Sen. Morgan Carroll Sen. Michael Johnston Leadership Sen. John Kefalas Sen. Rollie Heath Sen. Andy Kerr Sen. Linda Newell *Sen. Ted Harvey Sen. Lucia Guzman *Sen. Kevin Lundburg Sen. Evie Hudak Sen. Vickie Marble *Sen. David Balmer Sen. Pat Steadman Sen. Larry Crowder Speaker Ferrandino Sen. Jeanne Nicholson Sen. Cheri Jahn Sen. Lois Tochtrop *Sen. Nancy Todd Sen. Irene Aguilar Majority Ldr Hullinghorst Minority Ldr. Waller House of Reps Staff Colorado Representatives Rep. Lois Court Rep. Jonathan Singer *Rep. Janak Joshi Rep. Lois Landgraf Rep. Diane Mitsch Bush Rep. Joseph Salazar Rep. Jeanne Labuda Rep. Angela Williams Rep. Mike Foote *Rep. Tony Exum Rep. Justin Everett *Rep. Libby Szabo Rep. Dominick Moreno Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Post-Election Analysis: Colorado
    2014 POST-ELECTION ANALYSIS: COLORADO TABLE OF CONTENTS STATE OVERVIEW 2 Registration Overview 4 Turnout Analysis 5 Absentee/Early Voting 6 Regional Analysis 7 Election Law Impacts 7 Exit Polling 8 U.S. SENATE 12 Media Spending Analysis 16 Geographic Analysis 19 CONGRESS 20 CO-06 21 GOVERNOR 25 Primary 26 General 26 Media Spending Analysis 29 Geographic Analysis 32 OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICES 34 Secretary of State 34 STATE LEGISLATURE 39 State Senate 39 State House 40 Consequences 41 STATE OVERVIEW The year 2013 brought a political earthquake to Colorado. Fresh off a 5.4-point Obama win in 2012 and buttressed by popular incumbents like Governor John Hickenlooper and Senator Mark Udall, Colorado Democrats set out to put their political capital to work.1 During the 2013 legislative session, Democrats passed a major voting-reform law, raised the renewable-energy standard, and implemented one of the country’s strongest gun-safety measures; a few weeks later, Hickenlooper spared the life of convicted murderer Nathan Dunlap with a stay of execution.2 As much as these actions thrilled progressives, however, they angered and mobilized conservatives. Where he had previously been seen as an idiosyncratic consensus-builder, Hickenlooper quickly became a polarizing figure; when he later became apologetic about his 2013 accomplishments, he was derided as indecisive.3 Republicans took out their anger at the legislature with a major grassroots effort to recall some of the state senators responsible for the new gun-safety law; they took the fight all
    [Show full text]
  • State Offices
    2012-2013 CAWG Legislative Directory State Offices Governor John Hickenlooper (D) 200 E. Colfax Ave., Ste. 136 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-866-2471 Fax: 303-866-2003 Lieutenant Governor Joe Garcia (D) 200 E. Colfax Ave., Ste. 130 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-866-2087 Fax: 303-866-5469 State Treasurer Walker Stapleton (R) 200 E. Colfax Ave., Ste. 140 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-866-2441 Fax: 303-866-2123 [email protected] Attorney General John Suthers (R) 1300 Broadway, 10th Floor Denver, CO 80203 720-508-6000 Fax: 720-508-6030 [email protected] Secretary of State Scott Gessler (R) 1700 Broadway, Ste. 250 Denver, CO 80290 303-894-2200 Fax: 303-869-4864 [email protected] 83 2012-2013 CAWG Legislative Directory Representing Colorado in Washington, D.C. Senator Mark Udall (D) 328 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510-0605 Phone: (202) 224-5941 Fax: (202) 224-6471 Toll Free: (877)-768-3255 http://markudall.senate.gov/ Re-election: 2014 Senator Michael Bennet (D) 458 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-5852 Fax: (202) 228-5036 http://bennet.senate.gov Re-election: 2016 Representative Diana DeGette – District 1 (D) 2368 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone: (202) 225-4431 Fax: (202) 225-5657 http://degette.house.gov/ Representative Jared Polis – District 2 (D) 1433 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-2161 Fax: (202) 226-7840 http://polis.house.gov/ 84 Representative Scott Tipton – District 3 (R) 218 Cannon House
    [Show full text]
  • Lawmaker Quits Over Gun Control State Sen
    Thursday, Nov. 28, 2013 Lawmaker Quits Over Gun Control State Sen. Hudak Faced Possible Recall Over Support of Curbs by JOE PALAZZOLO A Colorado lawmaker facing a possible recall election for her support of gun-control legislation resigned Wednesday, marking the latest victory for state gun-rights activists who vowed payback for a package of gun bills that passed earlier in the year. State Sen. Evie Hudak, a Democrat whose district sits about a dozen miles northwest of Denver, might have been the third lawmaker this year replaced by a Republican in a recall vote, had she stayed in office. Her opponents were gathering signatures for a petition and planned to submit them to the secretary of state next week. The first recall vote in the state’s history in September claimed the jobs of Senate President John Morse, from Colorado Springs, and Sen. Angela Giron, from Pueblo, reducing the Democrats’ edge over Republicans in the Senate to 18-17. Democrats will likely retain that edge, even after Ms. Hudak’s announcement, because of the state Senate’s succession rules. Ms. Hudak, who won her most recent election by a hair and represented a swing district, said in her resignation letter that she was defending laws passed this year that subjected private gun sales to background checks and banned magazines that hold more than 15 rounds. “By resigning, I am protecting these important new laws for the good of Colorado and ensuring that we can continue looking forward,” Ms. Hudak said. Doug Schepman, a spokesman for Colorado Senate Majority, said Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Koch Agenda in Colorado: Giving to Academic Institutions to Help Assimilate Colorado’S Youth
    RR44OOHHECECKK++YYOO MMCCHHOOSSkUkUNNTTAAIINN HHIIGGHH David and Charles Koch are turning states into their own political playgrounds, using their billions to influence policy to suit their business and personal needs, and Colorado is one of the most prolific examples. Together with their network of dark money groups, the Koch brothers are fighting to impose policies that fit their agenda while hurting middle-class Colorado families. In 2014, the Kochs topped the list of the 50 wealthiest billionaires who own property in Aspen’s Pitkin County. Charles and David have used their wealth to push their agenda through their vast network in Colorado, influencing both state and federal matters. The Kochs even made Aspen and Vail locations for their private donor retreats, where they discussed the “threat” of unions, climate regulations, and financial regulations. Their brother, Bill Koch, followed their lead of buying local influence, and created a non-profit solely to persuade Pitkin County to approve new guardrails near his Aspen mansion. Koch Industries operates several businesses in Colorado, where they’ll do whatever is necessary to better their bottom line even if it harms the state or its people. Several Koch entities in Colorado clashed with the EPA for failing to register facilities, violating reporting requirements and for not complying with emission rules. While they claim to advocate against increased state spending, Koch Financial Corp had “more than $80 million in contracts” with Colorado since 1996, including purchase and lease agreements, and even road construction, which they subsequently botched. Americans For Prosperity (AFP) is the most entrenched Koch group in Colorado politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor John Hickenlooper: United States Senate: United States
    United States Senate: Senator Email Phone Mark Udall Email Senator Udall (202) 224-5941 Michael Bennet Email Senator Bennet (202) 224-5852 United States Congress: District Representative Email Phone 1 Diana Degette Email Rep. Degette (202) 225-4431 2 Jared Polis Email Rep. Polis (202) 225-2161 3 Scott Tipton Email Rep. Tipton (202) 225-4761 4 Cory Gardner Email Rep. Gardner (202) 225-4676 5 Doug Lamborn Email Rep. Lamborn (202) 225-4422 6 Mike Coffman Email Rep. Coffman (202) 225-7882 7 Ed Perlmutter Email Rep. Perlmutter (202) 225-2645 Governor John Hickenlooper: Email Governor Hickenlooper Phone: (303) 866-2471 Colorado State Senate: District Senator Email Phone 1 Greg Brophy [email protected] (303) 866-6360 2 Kevin Grantham [email protected] (303) 866-4877 3 Angela Giron [email protected] (303) 866-4878 4 Mark Scheffel [email protected] (303) 866-4869 5 Gail Schwartz [email protected] (303) 866-4871 6 Ellen Roberts [email protected] (303) 866-4884 7 Steve King [email protected] (303) 866-3077 8 Randy Baumgardner [email protected] (303) 866-5292 9 Kent Lambert [email protected] (303) 866-4835 10 Owen Hill [email protected] (303) 866-2737 11 John Morse [email protected] (303) 866-6364 12 Bill Cadman [email protected] (303) 866-4880 13 Scott Renfroe [email protected] (303) 866-4451 14 John Kefalas [email protected] (303) 866-4841 15 Kevin Lundberg [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Pursuant to Section 3 of Article VI of the Colorado Constitution, The
    Colorado Supreme Court 2 East 14th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Original Proceeding Pursuant to Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of Colorado In Re: Interrogatory Propounded by Governor John Hickenlooper Concerning the Supreme Court Case No: Constitutionality of Certain Provisions of 2013SA 214 Article XXI, § 3 of the Constitution of the State of Colorado. ORDER OF COURT Pursuant to Section 3 of Article VI of the Colorado Constitution, the Governor submitted an interrogatory to this Court on August 23, 2013, concerning the constitutionality of article XXI, § 3, of the Colorado Constitution. The Interrogatory propounded by Governor John Hickenlooper is: Colorado Constitution Article XXI, § 3 requires an elector who wishes to vote for a successor candidate in a recall election to also cast a ballot on the recall issue. Is this requirement consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? We ordered that the Governor, the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, the El Paso County Clerk and Recorder, the Pueblo County Clerk and Recorder, Senator Angela Giron, Senator John Morse, the Colorado Democratic Party, the Libertarian Party of Colorado, the Republican Party of Colorado and any other interested persons be permitted to file simultaneous Briefs concerning the 1 Interrogatory with the Clerk of the Colorado Supreme Court. We received briefs from Secretary of State Scott Gessler; Senator Angela Giron, Senator John Morse and the Colorado Democratic Party; the Libertarian Party of Colorado and Gordon Roy Butt. This Interrogatory presents an “important question upon solemn occasion[]” invoking our original jurisdiction pursuant to Article VI, Section 3, of the Constitution of the State of Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Pursuant to Section 3 of Article VI of the Colorado Constitution, The
    Colorado Supreme Court 2 East 14th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Original Proceeding Pursuant to Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of Colorado In Re: Interrogatory Propounded by Governor John Hickenlooper Concerning the Supreme Court Case No: Constitutionality of Certain Provisions of 2013SA 214 Article XXI, § 3 of the Constitution of the State of Colorado. ORDER OF COURT Pursuant to Section 3 of Article VI of the Colorado Constitution, the Governor submitted an interrogatory to this Court on August 23, 2013, concerning the constitutionality of article XXI, § 3, of the Colorado Constitution. The Interrogatory propounded by Governor John Hickenlooper is: Colorado Constitution Article XXI, § 3 requires an elector who wishes to vote for a successor candidate in a recall election to also cast a ballot on the recall issue. Is this requirement consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? We ordered that the Governor, the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, the El Paso County Clerk and Recorder, the Pueblo County Clerk and Recorder, Senator Angela Giron, Senator John Morse, the Colorado Democratic Party, the Libertarian Party of Colorado, the Republican Party of Colorado and any other interested persons be permitted to file simultaneous Briefs concerning the 1 Interrogatory with the Clerk of the Colorado Supreme Court. We received briefs from Secretary of State Scott Gessler; Senator Angela Giron, Senator John Morse and the Colorado Democratic Party; the Libertarian Party of Colorado and Gordon Roy Butt. This Interrogatory presents an “important question upon solemn occasion[]” invoking our original jurisdiction pursuant to Article VI, Section 3, of the Constitution of the State of Colorado.
    [Show full text]