Leg 207 Preliminary Report
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
30. Turonian–Santonian Benthic
Mascle, J., Lohmann, G.P., and Moullade, M. (Eds.), 1998 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 159 30. TURONIAN–SANTONIAN BENTHIC FORAMINIFER ASSEMBLAGES FROM SITE 959D (CÔTE D’IVOIRE-GHANA TRANSFORM MARGIN, EQUATORIAL ATLANTIC): INDICATION OF A LATE CRETACEOUS OXYGEN MINIMUM ZONE1 Ann E.L. Holbourn2,3 and Wolfgang Kuhnt2 ABSTRACT Turonian–Santonian organic-rich fissile black claystones with laminated intervals from Hole 959D on the Côte d’Ivoire- Ghana Transform Margin, drilled during Ocean Drilling Program Leg 159, contain benthic foraminifer assemblages dominated by buliminid associations. The lower Turonian assemblage from Core 159-959D-68R is strongly dominated by Bolivina anam- bra, Praebulimina sp. 1, Praebulimina sp. 2, Praebulimina sp. 3, and Gavelinella spp. The upper Turonian to lower Coniacian assemblage from Core 159-959D-67R displays low abundance and low diversity and consists mostly of organically cemented agglutinated taxa and/or some corroded tests of Lenticulina, Bolivina, Gyroidinoides ex gr. nitidus. The middle Coniacian to lower Santonian assemblage from Core 159-959D-66R and from the base of Core 159-959D-65R contains high numbers of Praebulimina robusta, Praebulimina fang, Neobulimina subregularis, and Buliminella cf. gabonica, but shows marked fluctua- tions in abundance and diversity, which appear to be related to changes in total organic carbon. The distinct composition of the two buliminid associations in Core 159-959D-68R and Core 159-959D-66R suggests that endemism was stronger during the early Turonian, when circulation was probably more restricted and connections between equatorial Atlantic basins were lim- ited. We interpret the late Coniacian–early Santonian depositional environment to be an oxygen minimum zone in a more open marine outer shelf or upper slope setting. -
Cenomanian Turonian Coniacian Santonian Campanian
walteri aff. aff. spp. spp. imperfectus spp. (prisms) Chronostratigraphy Offshore Norway sp. 1 Geologic Time Scale 2012 Zonation (Gradstein et al., 1999, and this study) Allomorphina halli / pyriformis Sigmoilina antiqua Textularia Gavelinella intermeda gracillima Valvulineria Bulbobaculites problematicus Caudammina ovuloides Nuttallinella florealis Stensioeina granulata polonica Inoceramus Rzehakina minima Rzehakina epigona Fenestrella bellii Gaudryina filiformis Trochamminoides Haplophragmoides Gavelinella usakensis Caudammina ovula Coarse agglutinated spp. LCO dubia Tritaxia Plectorecurvoides alternans Reussella szajnochae Recurvoides Hippocrepina depressa Psammosphaera sphaerical radiolarians Ma Age/Stage Lingulogavelinella jarzevae elegans Lt NCF19 Maastrichtian volutus LCO 70 NCF18 E szajnochae dubia Lt 75 LCO of NCF17 Campanian Deep Water M Agglutinated 80 Foraminifera E bellii NCF16 Lt Inoceramus LCO NCF15 85 Santonian M E polonica NCF14 Lt Coniacian M E Marginotruncana NCF13 90 Lt Turonian M E Dicarinella NCF12 95 Lt brittonensis M NCF11 Cenomanian delrioensis LCO NCF10 E antiqua NCF9 100 Figure 2.8c. Stratigraphic ranges of Upper Cretaceous benthic foraminifera, and miscellaneous index taxa, oshore mid-Norway, with the foraminiferal zonation established in this study. s.l. Chronostratigraphy Offshore Norway Geologic Time Scale 2012 Zonation (Gradstein et al., 1999, and this study) Abathomphalus mayaroensis Pseudotextularia elegans Hedbergella planispira Hedbergella hoelzi Praeglobotruncana delrioensis Praeglobotruncana stephani -
Upper Cenomanian •fi Lower Turonian (Cretaceous) Calcareous
Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Geologia, 2010, 55 (1), 29 – 36 Upper Cenomanian – Lower Turonian (Cretaceous) calcareous algae from the Eastern Desert of Egypt: taxonomy and significance Ioan I. BUCUR1, Emad NAGM2 & Markus WILMSEN3 1Department of Geology, “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Kogălniceanu 1, 400084 Cluj Napoca, Romania 2Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Egypt 3Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Mineralogie und Geologie, Sektion Paläozoologie, Königsbrücker Landstr. 159, D-01109 Dresden, Germany Received March 2010; accepted April 2010 Available online 27 April 2010 DOI: 10.5038/1937-8602.55.1.4 Abstract. An assemblage of calcareous algae (dasycladaleans and halimedaceans) is described from the Upper Cenomanian to Lower Turonian of the Galala and Maghra el Hadida formations (Wadi Araba, northern Eastern Desert, Egypt). The following taxa have been identified: Dissocladella sp., Neomeris mokragorensis RADOIČIĆ & SCHLAGINTWEIT, 2007, Salpingoporella milovanovici RADOIČIĆ, 1978, Trinocladus divnae RADOIČIĆ, 2006, Trinocladus cf. radoicicae ELLIOTT, 1968, and Halimeda cf. elliotti CONARD & RIOULT, 1977. Most of the species are recorded for the first time from Egypt. Three of the identified algae (T. divnae, S. milovanovici and H. elliotti) also occur in Cenomanian limestones of the Mirdita zone, Serbia, suggesting a trans-Tethyan distribution of these taxa during the early Late Cretaceous. The abundance and preservation of the algae suggest an autochthonous occurrence which can be used to characterize the depositional environment. The recorded calcareous algae as well as the sedimentologic and palaeontologic context of the Galala Formation support an open-lagoonal (non-restricted), warm-water setting. The Maghra el Hadida Formation was mainly deposited in a somewhat deeper, open shelf setting. -
Late Cretaceous (Santonian-Campanian) Stratigraphy of the Northern Sacramento Valley, California
Late Cretaceous (Santonian-Campanian) stratigraphy of the northern Sacramento Valley, California DcT^rf {Department of Geology, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616 rElbK L). WAKL) J ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS The Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian-lower Thick accumulations of Upper Cretaceous Strata of the Chico Formation dip gently to Campanian) Chico Formation of the north- sedimentary deposits are found on the western, the southwest. Sections were mejisured using eastern Sacramento Valley, California, includes northern, and eastern margins of the Great Val- either tape and compass or Jacob's staff. In some three newly defined members at the type local- ley of California (Fig. 1). The search for oil and areas, outcrop data were plotted on U.S. Geo- ity: (1) cobble conglomerate of the basal Pon- gas in northern California, as well as interest in logical Survey topographic quadrangles and derosa Way Member, (2) coarse-grained con- the processes of sedimentation in fore-arc re- stratigraphie columns were determined trigo- glomeratic sandstone of the overlying Musty gimes, has made the Great Valley seque nce, ex- nometrically. Paleontologic collections of mac- Buck Member, and (3) fine-grained silty sand- posed along the west side of the Sacramento rofossils were made during the measuring of stone of the uppermost Ten Mile Member. Valley, probably the best-studied fore-arc de- sections. Minor offset of bedding was observed Other outcrops of the Chico Formation exhibit posit in the world (Ojakangas, 1968; Dickinson, on more southerly exposures of the Chico For- the same three members plus an additional unit, 1971; Ingersoll, 1978, 1979). These workers in- mation, and such structural modification be- the Kingsley Cave Member, composed of mud- terpreted strata of the Great Valley sequence to comes more prominent farther north. -
Cretaceous Research 69 (2017) 49E55
Cretaceous Research 69 (2017) 49e55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes High-resolution calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Santonian/Campanian Stage boundary, Western Interior Basin, USA * Zachary A. Kita a, , David K. Watkins a, Bradley B. Sageman b a Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA b Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA article info abstract Article history: The base of the Campanian Stage does not have a ratified Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP); Received 26 June 2016 however, several potential boundary markers have been proposed including the base of the Scaphites leei Received in revised form III ammonite Zone and the base of the paleomagnetic Chron C33r. Calcareous nannofossil assemblages 25 August 2016 from the Smoky Hill Member of the Niobrara Formation in the central Western Interior Seaway, USA Accepted in revised form 28 August 2016 were analyzed from two localities to determine relevant biohorizons and their relationships to these Available online 30 August 2016 potential boundary markers. In a previous study, the Aristocrat Angus 12-8 core (Colorado) was astro- chronologically dated and constrained using macrofossil zonations and radiometric ages. The Smoky Hill Keywords: Calcareous nannofossils Member type area (Kansas) provides an expanded interval with good to excellent nannofossil Biostratigraphy preservation. -
Campanian and Austinian-Tayloran Stage Boundaries in Mississippi and Alabama Using Calcareous Microfossils
Documentation of the Santonian Campanian and Austinian-Tayloran Stage Boundaries in Mississippi and Alabama Using Calcareous Microfossils U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1884 AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of -
Report 2015–1087
Chronostratigraphic Cross Section of Cretaceous Formations in Western Montana, Western Wyoming, Eastern Utah, Northeastern Arizona, and Northwestern New Mexico, U.S.A. Pamphlet to accompany Open-File Report 2015–1087 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Chronostratigraphic Cross Section of Cretaceous Formations in Western Montana, Western Wyoming, Eastern Utah, Northeastern Arizona, and Northwestern New Mexico, U.S.A. By E.A. Merewether and K.C. McKinney Pamphlet to accompany Open-File Report 2015–1087 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Merewether, E.A., and McKinney, K.C., 2015, Chronostratigraphic cross section of Cretaceous formations in western Montana, western Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, and northwestern New Mexico, U.S.A.: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015–1087, 10 p. -
A New Middle Jurassic Diplodocoid Suggests an Earlier Dispersal and Diversification of Sauropod Dinosaurs
ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05128-1 OPEN A new Middle Jurassic diplodocoid suggests an earlier dispersal and diversification of sauropod dinosaurs Xing Xu1, Paul Upchurch2, Philip D. Mannion 3, Paul M. Barrett 4, Omar R. Regalado-Fernandez 2, Jinyou Mo5, Jinfu Ma6 & Hongan Liu7 1234567890():,; The fragmentation of the supercontinent Pangaea has been suggested to have had a profound impact on Mesozoic terrestrial vertebrate distributions. One current paradigm is that geo- graphic isolation produced an endemic biota in East Asia during the Jurassic, while simul- taneously preventing diplodocoid sauropod dinosaurs and several other tetrapod groups from reaching this region. Here we report the discovery of the earliest diplodocoid, and the first from East Asia, to our knowledge, based on fossil material comprising multiple individuals and most parts of the skeleton of an early Middle Jurassic dicraeosaurid. The new discovery challenges conventional biogeographical ideas, and suggests that dispersal into East Asia occurred much earlier than expected. Moreover, the age of this new taxon indicates that many advanced sauropod lineages originated at least 15 million years earlier than previously realised, achieving a global distribution while Pangaea was still a coherent landmass. 1 Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology & Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100044 Beijing, China. 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. 3 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 4 Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. 5 Natural History Museum of Guangxi, 530012 Nanning, Guangxi, China. -
Upper Cretaceous Subsurface Stratigraphy and Structure of Coastal Georgia and South Carolina
i, 5 Upper Cretaceous Subsurface Stratigraphy and Structure of Coastal Georgia and South Carolina GEOtQGIC AL SURVE:Y PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1222 Upper Cretaceous Subsurface Stratigraphy and Structure of Coastal Georgia and South Carolina By PAGE C. VALENTINE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1222 A study based on 24 wells along transects from the Southeast Georgia Embayment northeastward to the Cape Fear Arch and offshore to the Outer Continental Shelf UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Valentine, Page C. Upper Cretaceous subsurface stratigraphy and structure of coastal Georgia and South Carolina. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1222) "A study based on 24 wells along transects from the Southeast Georgia Embayment northeastward to the Cape Fear Arch and offshore to the Outer Continental Shelf." Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: 119.16:1222 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Cretaceous. 2. Geology-Georgia. 3. Geology-South Carolina. 4. Coasts-Georgia. 5. Coasts-South Carolina. I. Title. II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1222. QE688.V35 551.7T09757 80-607868 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page Abstract ___________. Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy-Continued Introduction _________. Clubhouse Crossroads corehole 1, South Carolina _____ 15 Acknowledgments -
ARTICLES Definition of Late Cretaceous Stage Boundaries In
ARTICLES De®nition of Late Cretaceous Stage Boundaries in Antarctica Using Strontium Isotope Stratigraphy J. M. McArthur, J. A. Crame,1 and M. F. Thirlwall2 Department of Geological Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT New 87Sr/86Sr analyses of macrofossils from 13 key marker horizons on James Ross and Vega Islands, Antarctica, allow the integration of the Antarctic Late Cretaceous succession into the standard biostratigraphic zonation schemes of the Northern Hemisphere. The 87Sr/86Sr data enable Late Cretaceous stage boundaries to be physically located with accuracy for the ®rst time in a composite Southern Hemisphere reference section and so make the area one of global importance for documenting Late Cretaceous biotic evolution, particularly radiation and extinction events. The 87Sr/86Sr values allow the stage boundaries of the Turonian/Coniacian, Coniacian/Santonian, Santonian/Campanian, and Campanian/Maastrichtian, as well as other levels, to be correlated with both the United Kingdom and United States. These correlations show that current stratigraphic ages in Antarctica are too young by as much as a stage. Immediate implications of our new ages include the fact that Inoceramus madagascariensis, a useful fossil for regional austral correlation, is shown to be Turonian (probably Late Turonian) in age; the ªMytiloidesº africanus species complex is exclusively Late Coniacian in age; both Baculites bailyi and Inoceramus cf. expansus have a Late Con- iacian/Early Santonian age range; an important heteromorph ammonite assemblage comprising species of Eubostry- choceras, Pseudoxybeloceras, Ainoceras, and Ryugasella is con®rmed as ranging from latest Coniacian to very earliest Campanian. -
Paleogeographic Maps Earth History
History of the Earth Age AGE Eon Era Period Period Epoch Stage Paleogeographic Maps Earth History (Ma) Era (Ma) Holocene Neogene Quaternary* Pleistocene Calabrian/Gelasian Piacenzian 2.6 Cenozoic Pliocene Zanclean Paleogene Messinian 5.3 L Tortonian 100 Cretaceous Serravallian Miocene M Langhian E Burdigalian Jurassic Neogene Aquitanian 200 23 L Chattian Triassic Oligocene E Rupelian Permian 34 Early Neogene 300 L Priabonian Bartonian Carboniferous Cenozoic M Eocene Lutetian 400 Phanerozoic Devonian E Ypresian Silurian Paleogene L Thanetian 56 PaleozoicOrdovician Mesozoic Paleocene M Selandian 500 E Danian Cambrian 66 Maastrichtian Ediacaran 600 Campanian Late Santonian 700 Coniacian Turonian Cenomanian Late Cretaceous 100 800 Cryogenian Albian 900 Neoproterozoic Tonian Cretaceous Aptian Early 1000 Barremian Hauterivian Valanginian 1100 Stenian Berriasian 146 Tithonian Early Cretaceous 1200 Late Kimmeridgian Oxfordian 161 Callovian Mesozoic 1300 Ectasian Bathonian Middle Bajocian Aalenian 176 1400 Toarcian Jurassic Mesoproterozoic Early Pliensbachian 1500 Sinemurian Hettangian Calymmian 200 Rhaetian 1600 Proterozoic Norian Late 1700 Statherian Carnian 228 1800 Ladinian Late Triassic Triassic Middle Anisian 1900 245 Olenekian Orosirian Early Induan Changhsingian 251 2000 Lopingian Wuchiapingian 260 Capitanian Guadalupian Wordian/Roadian 2100 271 Kungurian Paleoproterozoic Rhyacian Artinskian 2200 Permian Cisuralian Sakmarian Middle Permian 2300 Asselian 299 Late Gzhelian Kasimovian 2400 Siderian Middle Moscovian Penn- sylvanian Early Bashkirian -
2009 Geologic Time Scale Cenozoic Mesozoic Paleozoic Precambrian Magnetic Magnetic Bdy
2009 GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST. HIST. ANOM. ANOM. (Ma) CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 65.5 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 542 CALABRIAN MAASTRICHTIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE 1.8 31 C31 251 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 70.6 254 2A PIACENZIAN 32 C32 L 630 C2A 3.6 WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN 33 CAMPANIAN CAPITANIAN 5 C3 5.3 266 750 NEOPRO- CRYOGENIAN 80 C33 M WORDIAN MESSINIAN LATE 268 TEROZOIC 3A C3A 83.5 ROADIAN 7.2 SANTONIAN 271 85.8 KUNGURIAN 850 4 276 C4 CONIACIAN 280 4A 89.3 ARTINSKIAN TONIAN C4A L TORTONIAN 90 284 TURONIAN PERMIAN 10 5 93.5 E 1000 1000 C5 SAKMARIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 297 99.6 ASSELIAN STENIAN SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 299.0 5A 100 300 GZELIAN C5A 13.8 M KASIMOVIAN 304 1200 PENNSYL- 306 1250 15 5B LANGHIAN ALBIAN MOSCOVIAN MESOPRO- C5B VANIAN 312 ECTASIAN 5C 16.0 110 BASHKIRIAN TEROZOIC C5C 112 5D C5D MIOCENE 320 318 1400 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 326 6 C6 APTIAN 20 120 1500 CALYMMIAN E 20.4 6A C6A EARLY MISSIS- M0r 125 VISEAN 1600 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 SIPPIAN M3 BARREMIAN C6C 23.0 345 6C CRETACEOUS 130 M5 130 STATHERIAN CARBONIFEROUS TOURNAISIAN 7 C7 HAUTERIVIAN 1750 25 7A M10 C7A 136 359 8 C8 L CHATTIAN M12 VALANGINIAN 360 L 1800 140 M14 140 9 C9 M16 FAMENNIAN BERRIASIAN M18 PROTEROZOIC OROSIRIAN 10 C10 28.4 145.5 M20 2000 30 11 C11 TITHONIAN 374 PALEOPRO- 150 M22 2050 12 E RUPELIAN