DOCSLIB.ORG

Oceanside Pure Water Oceanside Project, Oceanside, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oceanside Pure Water Oceanside Project, Oceanside, California Pure Water Oceanside Appendix C Mitigated Negative Declaration APPENDIX C - CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Note: This appendix includes Appendix C-1 for the Pure Water Oceanside Project and Appendix C-2 for the Upper and Lower SLRWRF Recycled Water Conveyance System Project. November 2018 Appendix C-1 Pure Water Oceanside Project, Oceanside, California Cultural Resources Assessment Report prepared for City of Oceanside 300 North Coast Highway Oceanside, California 92054 prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2215 Faraday Avenue, Suite A Carlsbad, California 92008 August 2018 Please cite this report as follows: Courtney, Michelle, Hannah Haas, Christopher Duran, Breana Campbell‐King, and Kevin Hunt 2018 San Luis Rey Water Reclamation Facility Expansion (Phase II) San Diego County, California. Rincon Consultants Project No. 15‐02337. Report on file at the South Coast Information Center, San Diego State University, California Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources ............................................................................ 2 Human Remains ............................................................................................................................. 2 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Area of Potential Effects .................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Project Personnel ............................................................................................................... 9 2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Federal ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 State ................................................................................................................................. 10 3 Natural and Cultural Setting ........................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Natural Setting ................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Cultural Setting ................................................................................................................ 12 4 Background Research .................................................................................................................. 18 4.1 California Historical Resources Information System ........................................................ 18 4.2 Native American Outreach ............................................................................................... 29 4.3 Local Interested Parties Consultation .............................................................................. 30 4.4 Caltrans Bridge Inventory ................................................................................................ 30 5 Pedestrian Survey ........................................................................................................................ 31 5.1 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 31 5.2 Results .............................................................................................................................. 31 6 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................ 33 6.1 Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources ............................................................... 33 6.2 Human Remains ............................................................................................................... 34 7 References ................................................................................................................................... 35 Cultural Resources Assessment Report i City of Oceanside Pure Water Oceanside Project, Oceanside, California Tables Table 1 Previously Conducted Studies within a 0.5‐mile Radius of the Project APE .................... 18 Table 2 Previously Recorded Resources within a 0.5‐mile Radius of the Project APE ................. 27 Figures Figure 1 Project Location Map/ Area of Potential Effects Map ........................................................ 4 Figure 2 Project APE with Options A, B, and C .................................................................................. 8 Figure 3 HDD Crossing Option A Solar Fields and Fenceline ........................................................... 32 Figure 4 HDD Crossing Option C Proposed Exit Pit Location .......................................................... 32 Appendices Appendix A Confidential Records Search Results (under separate cover) Appendix B Native American Outreach and Local Interested Parties Consultation ii Executive Summary Executive Summary Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) was retained by Woodard & Curran to conduct a Phase I cultural resources study for the Pure Water Oceanside Project, in the city of Oceanside, San Diego County, California. This project involves construction of an advanced water treatment (AWT) facility, pure water conveyance pipelines, injection wells, monitoring wells, and backwash piping. The project includes three options (A, B, and C) for the conveyance of advanced treated water, described in detail in this report. This study has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statutes and guidelines and the California State Water Resources Control Board’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund criteria for CEQA‐Plus cultural resources study. A CEQA‐Plus study includes analyses for project impacts under both CEQA and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) in the event that a federal nexus with the project is established (e.g., federal funding or permit/approval). This cultural resources study includes a records search, Native American outreach, local interested parties consultation, a pedestrian survey of the project site, and preparation of this report. The cultural resources records search identified 29 cultural resources within a 0.5‐mile radius of the Area of Potential Effects (APE); three cultural resources are recorded in the project APE. The survey resulted in positive findings for the horizontal directional drilling (HDD) crossing Option A. Artifacts likely associated with a repatriated and reburied archaeological site were found during the survey of Option A. Due to the positive survey results and Native American concerns for the resource, the City of Oceanside determined development of HDD Option A would result in significant and unavoidable impacts; therefore, HDD Crossing Option A will not be considered for the project. No formal recording was completed for the artifacts identified during the survey, since Option A is no longer considered part of the project. Three cultural resources were identified in the APE during the record search: P‐37‐011470, P‐37‐011468, and P‐37‐037110. The Rancho Francisco Pico/Whelan Ranch (P‐ 37‐011470) site was not relocated and no evidence of the site was observed in the APE. The resource boundaries are adjacent to the project APE, but the project would not have a negative impact or affect the resource. Prehistoric site P‐37‐011468 was not relocated during the survey. The mapped location of the resource is graded and highly disturbed with modern housing construction to the east. P‐37‐011468 was likely destroyed during the residential construction or mapped incorrectly. P‐37‐037110, the San Luis Rey Water Reclamation Facility (SLRWRF) treatment plant, was recommended previously as being ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) and requires no management consideration under the current undertaking. Given the presence of cultural resources near the APE, and the location nearby of the San Luis Rey River, a feature that would have been attractive for prehistoric habitation, the project vicinity is considered highly sensitive for cultural resources. However, much of the APE has been previously disturbed by the construction and maintenance of existing infrastructure and the possibility of encountering intact subsurface cultural resources is considered low for HDD Options B and C. Based on the results of the records search, Native American scoping, field survey, and built environment study, Rincon recommends a finding of no effect to historic properties for the current undertaking under the NHPA and no impact to historical resources under CEQA. To maintain this Cultural Resources Assessment Report 1 City of Oceanside Pure Water Oceanside Project, Oceanside, California finding, it is assumed HDD Option A will not be used. The following measures are recommended in the event unanticipated cultural resources or human remains are encountered. Unanticipated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OBSIDIAN: an INTERDISCIPLINARY Bffiliography
    OBSIDIAN: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BffiLIOGRAPHY Craig E. Skinner Kim J. Tremaine International Association for Obsidian Studies Occasional Paper No. 1 1993 \ \ Obsidian: An Interdisciplinary Bibliography by Craig E. Skinner Kim J. Tremaine • 1993 by Craig Skinner and Kim Tremaine International Association for Obsidian Studies Department of Anthropology San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192-0113 International Association for Obsidian Studies Occasional Paper No. 1 1993 Magmas cooled to freezing temperature and crystallized to a solid have to lose heat of crystallization. A glass, since it never crystallizes to form a solid, never changes phase and never has to lose heat of crystallization. Obsidian, supercooled below the crystallization point, remained a liquid. Glasses form when some physical property of a lava restricts ion mobility enough to prevent them from binding together into an ordered crystalline pattern. Aa the viscosity ofthe lava increases, fewer particles arrive at positions of order until no particle arrangement occurs before solidification. In a glaas, the ions must remain randomly arranged; therefore, a magma forming a glass must be extremely viscous yet fluid enough to reach the surface. 1he modem rational explanation for obsidian petrogenesis (Bakken, 1977:88) Some people called a time at the flat named Tok'. They were going to hunt deer. They set snares on the runway at Blood Gap. Adder bad real obsidian. The others made their arrows out of just anything. They did not know about obsidian. When deer were caught in snares, Adder shot and ran as fast as he could to the deer, pulled out the obsidian and hid it in his quiver.
    [Show full text]
  • HEP Letterhead Template
    HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 619.462.1515 tel 619.462.0552 fax www.helixepi.com July 7, 2017 Mr. Chris Loughridge CLL-01 CLL-Roselle, LLC 3565 Riviera Drive San Diego, California 92109 Subject: 10325 Roselle Street (Project No. 150566) Cultural Resources Report Addendum Dear Mr. Loughridge: This letter report serves as an addendum to the cultural resources report Archaeological Resources on a Lot on Roselle Street, San Diego, California by G. Timothy Gross (May 2009) and the addendum to that report, prepared by Mary Robbins-Wade of HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX) in January 2015. This letter report was prepared in response to a request from City of San Diego (City) staff that an archaeologist and a Native American monitor assess the current condition of the cultural resources within the project site. The proposed project design has not changed since the 2009 submittal. Site conditions within the project footprint have not changed, and the proposed data recovery plan is still adequate to mitigate potential project impacts, as described below. BACKGROUND The Roselle Street project (project) is located within the significant archaeological and cultural resource site known as Ystagua (CA-SDI-4609). The property is located on Roselle Street in Sorrento Valley, in the City of San Diego, in western San Diego County. The parcel is on the alluvial flats along Carroll Canyon Creek in Soledad Canyon, at the end of Roselle Street, although some of the steep valley wall is included in the eastern portion of the property, as well. On July 23, 2009, the project property was designated by the City’s Historical Resources Board (HRB) as HRB Site #924, Village of Ystagua Area #1.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN for The
    FINAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN for the APPROVED SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SUNRISE POWERLINK FINAL ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR SOUTHERN ROUTE, SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management El Centro Field Office 1661 S. 4th Street El Centro, California and SDG&E Special Projects 8315 Century Park Court, CP 21G San Diego, California 92123 Prepared by: David R. Iversen, MA, RPA Arleen Garcia-Herbst, M.A., RPA Don Laylander, M.A. ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 July 2010 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT .................................................................. v 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 1 Reroutes.......................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 9 CONSTRUCTION METHODS ......................................................................................... 9 DESCRIPTION OF AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS ................................................ 10 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................... 11 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert
    BLM LIBRARY BURE/ IT 88014080 An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert by E . G ary Stic kel and - L ois J . W einm an Ro berts with sections by Rainer Beig ei and Pare Hopa cultural resources publications anthropology— history Cover design represents a petroglyph element from Inscription Canyon, San Bernardino County, California. : AN OVERVIEW OF THE CULTURAL RESOURCES OF THE WESTERN TOJAVE DESERT by Gary Stickel and Lois J. Weinman- Roberts Environmental Research Archaeologists: A Scientific Consortium Los Angeles with sections by Rainer Berger and Pare Hopa BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LIBRARY Denver, Colorado 88014680 Prepared for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert Planning Program 3610 Central Avenue, Suite 402 Riverside, California 92506 Contract No. YA-512-CT8-106 ERIC W. RITTER GENERAL EDITOR Bureau of Land RIVERSIDE, CA Management Library 1980 Bldg. 50, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 *•' FOREWORD Culture resource overviews such as this bring together much of the available information on prehistoric and historic peoples and present- day Native American groups along with their associated environments. The purpose behind these studies is to provide background information for the management of and research into these prehistoric, historic, and contemporary resources. This overview is one of seven covering the southern California deserts undertaken as part of a comprehensive planning effort by the Bureau of Land Management for these deserts. Overviews aid in the day-to-day management of cultural resources and in the completion of environmental analyses and research projects. Its general value to the public in the fields of education and recreation-interpretation must also be stressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Report
    SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Archaeological Survey, Testing, and Evaluation of Three Bedrock Milling Feature Sites, and Evaluation of One-Built Environment Resource for the Stonemark Estates Project in Unincorporated San Diego County, California Prepared for Stonemark 26, LLC Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants Mav 2008 \ ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY, TESTING, AND EVALUATION OF THREE BEDROCK MILLING FEATURE SITES, AND EVALUATION OF ONE BUILT-ENVIRONMENT RESOURCE FOR THE STONEMARK ESTATES PROJECT IN UNINCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Tentative Map: TM5479 DPLU Environmental Log Number: REZ 06-003 Lead Agency: Department of Planning and Land Use County of San Diego 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B San Diego, Califomia 92123-1666 (858) 694-3754 Contact: Terry Powers Prepared for: Stonemark 26, LLC 5422 Napa Street San Diego, Califomia 92110 Contact: Walid Romaya Prepared by: Michael W. Tuma^ M.S., RPA Signature Caprice D. (KipKip) Hamper, M.A., RPA and Susan Underbrink, MA., RPA SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 625 Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 190 South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 626-240-0587 www.swca.com Contact: Caprice D. (Kip) Harper USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle San Marcos, CA (1968, Photorevised 1983) SWCA Project No. 14004 SWCA CRRD No. 2008-92 May 2008 CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDY STONEMARK ESTATES PROJECT NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA BASE INFORMATION Authors: Michael W. Tuma, Caprice D. (Kip) Harper, and Susan Underbrink Firm: SWCA Environmental Consultants, 625 Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 190 South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 Client/Project
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • Final Archaeological and Historical Investigations for the Energia Sierra Juarez U.S
    FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE ENERGIA SIERRA JUAREZ U.S. GEN-TIE LINE PROJECT JACUMBA, CALIFORNIA Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC MUP 09-008, Log No. 09-22-001 Lead Agency: County of San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use Contact: Patrick Brown 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B San Diego, California 92123 (619) 694-3831 Preparers: Stacey C. Jordan, Ph.D., R.P.A., EDAW, Inc. 1420 Kettner Blvd., Suite 500 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 233-1454 _____________________________ Stacey C. Jordan, Ph.D. With contributions by Ecology & Environment, Inc. Project Proponent: Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC 101 Ash Street, HQ 14 San Diego, California 92101 MayJuly 2010 National Archaeological Data Base Information Authors: Stacey C. Jordan with contributions by Ecology & Environment, Inc. Firm: EDAW, Inc. Client/Project Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC Proponent: Report Date: July 2010 Report Title: Draft Archaeological and Historical Investigations for the Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Gen-Tie Line Project, Jacumba, California Type of Study: Intensive Pedestrian Survey and Phase I Testing New Sites: CA-SDI-19480, CA-SDI-19484, CA-SDI-19485, CA-SDI-19486, CA-SDI-19488, CA-SDI-19489, CA-SDI-19490, CA-SDI-19492, CA-SDI-19493, CA-SDI-19494, P-37-30672, P-37-30673, P-37-30674, P-37-30675, P-37-30678 Updated Sites CA-SDI-6119 USGS Quad: In-Ko-Pah Gorge 1975 Acreage: Approximately 73.81 acres Permit Numbers: MUP 09-008, Log No. 09-22-001 Key Words: Intensive pedestrian survey, Phase I testing; ceramic scatter, lithic scatter, lithic reduction area, quarry, CA-SDI-6119, CA-SDI-19480, CA-SDI-19484, CA-SDI-19485, CA-SDI-19486, CA-SDI-19488, CA-SDI-19489, CA-SDI-19490, CA-SDI-19492, CA-SDI-19493, CA-SDI-19494, P-37-30672, P-37-30673, P-37-30674, P-37-30675, P-37-30678 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land
    DRECP Proposed LUPA and Final EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the Affected Environment for the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Decision Area and the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) area for cultural resources. These areas overlap, and in the following programmatic discussion are referred to broadly as the “California Desert Region.” More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the DRECP area in every existing environmental context ⎼ from mountain crests to dry lake beds ⎼ and include both surface and subsurface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts (including cultural landscapes and Traditional Cultural Properties) under the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), maintained by the Secretary of the Interior (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation of California prior to prolonged European contact. These resources may include sites and deposits, structures, artifacts, rock art, trails, and other traces of Native American human behavior. In California, the prehistoric period began over 12,000 years ago and extended through the eighteenth century until 1769, when the first Europeans settled in California. Ethnographic resources represent the heritage of a particular ethnic or cultural group, such as Native Americans or African, European, Latino, or Asian immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase-1 Cultural Resources Survey
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF THE BROOKFIELD MINOR RANCH PROJECT IN THE CITY OF MENIFEE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USGS Romoland 7.5' Quadrangle; Township 5S, Range 3W, Sections 13 and 24 Prepared for: Albert A. WEBB Associates Riverside, California 92506 Prepared by: Tiffany Clark and Dennis McDougall Applied EarthWorks, Inc. 3550 East Florida Avenue, Suite H Hemet, CA 92544-4937 April 2019 Keywords: 598 acres surveyed; City of Menifee; Riverside County; CEQA Phase I; Section 106 NHPA; two prehistoric cultural resources; bedrock milling features; lithic scatter; CA-RIV-3429 (P-33-003429); CA-RIV-12345 (P-33-24902) CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................... iv 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Description and Location .............................................................................1 1.2 Regulatory Context ..................................................................................................1 1.2.1 Federal Laws and Regulations .....................................................................4 1.2.2 State Laws and Regulations .........................................................................4 1.3 Area of Potential Effects (APE) ...............................................................................5 1.4 Report Organization .................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • 4.5 Cultural Resources
    4.5 – Cultural Resources 4.5 Cultural Resources This section identifies cultural and paleontological resources along the IC Project Alignment, identifies applicable significance thresholds, assesses the IC Project’s impacts to these resources and their significance, and recommends measures to avoid or substantially reduce any effects found to be potentially significant. Cultural resources are defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use that is identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building/structural, and traditional resources. Archaeological resources include prehistoric and historic remains of human activity. Prehistoric resources can be composed of lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Historic-era resources are typically those that are 50 years or older. Historic archaeological resources can consist of structural remains (e.g., concrete foundations), historic objects (e.g., bottles and cans), features (e.g., refuse deposits or scatters), and sites (e.g., resources that contain one or more of the aforementioned categories). Built environment resources range from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, cemeteries, and electrical infrastructure, such as transmission lines, substations, and generating facilities. A traditional cultural resource is a resource associated with the cultural practices, traditions, beliefs, lifeways, arts, crafts, or social institutions of a living community. They are rooted in a traditional community’s history and are important in maintaining the continuing cultural identity of the community. See Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, for a discussion on cultural resources of potential importance to California Native American tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Juan Manuel Rivera Acosta Phd Thesis
    LEAVE US ALONE, WE DO NOT WANT YOUR HELP. LET US LIVE OUR LIVES; INDIGENOUS RESISTANCE AND ETHNOGENESIS IN NUEVA VIZCAYA (COLONIAL MEXICO) Juan Manuel Rivera Acosta A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2017 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11060 This item is protected by original copyright Leave us alone, we do not want your help. Let us live our lives; Indigenous resistance and ethnogenesis in Nueva Vizcaya (colonial Mexico) Juan Manuel Rivera Acosta This thesis is submitted in partial FulFilment For the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews October 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Juan Manuel Rivera Acosta, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 75,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in Social Anthropology and Amerindian Studies in September 2010; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date 29-10-2015 signature of candidate ……… 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in Social Anthropology and Amerindian Studies in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME I: INVENTORIES OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES ON CALIFORNIA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 Prepared by: FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Sacramento, California 95834 and JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March2000 Calirornia llisloric Miliiary Buildings and Structures Inventory, \'olume I CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... viii SERIES INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 I. I Purpose and Goals ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]