DOCSLIB.ORG

ROMOLAND USGS 7.5-Min

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE MENIFEE TRACT 37400 PROJECT CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA (ROMOLAND U.S.G.S. 7.5-minute quadrangle, Township 5 South / Range 3 West Section 16 SBBM) Assssor’s Parcel Numbers 331-080-005-7, 331-080-009-12, 331-080-018-21, 331-080-024, 331-080-025, 331-080-027, and 331-080-028 Prepared on Behalf of: The Garrett Group, LLC, Miriam Rodriguez Two Betterworld Circle, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 951-801-1857 Prepared for: The City of Menifee Planning Department 29714 Haun Road Menifee, CA 92586 Prepared by: Sue A. Wade Heritage Resources P.O. Box 8 Ramona, CA 92065 760-445-3502 September 12, 2018 (Field Survey 12/27/2017) Heritage Resources Project Number 17010 Keywords: 46.9 Acres, Negative Results MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the methods and results of a Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Menifee Tract 37400 property. The project property consists of 46.9 acres located in Perris Valley, southeast of the community of Romoland and north of the community of Sun City, in the City of Menifee. The project is a Tentative Tract Map (No. 37400) proposal to the City of Menifee for residential development. The proposal is by The Garrett Group, Two Better World Circle, Suite 200, Temecula, CA 92590. Proposed site improvements will include 174 single-family residential buildings, a 1.23-acre centrally located park, a water quality basin, and associated surface improvements. Development of the project will most likely include minimal cuts and fills of up to a few feet based on existing topography of the site (GeoTek 2018). The proposed project is required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 21083.2 and 15064.5 of the Guidelines) and the City of Menifee General Plan (Open Space and Conservation Element OSC5: Paleontological and Cultural Resources). The research and fieldwork undertaken and this report follow the survey standard scope of work and report outline guidelines required by the City of Menifee. The Phase I cultural resource survey tasks consisted of archival research, a 1-mile radius record search with the Eastern Information Center (EIC), a field survey, a Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and preparation of this report documenting the negative survey findings. The record search revealed that portions of the property had been previously surveyed and no cultural resources were located. The field survey was completed on December 27, 2017 by Sue Wade of Heritage Resources and encountered no archaeological resources. As a result of the Sacred Lands File search, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) noted negative results for the project property/APE (Area of Potential Effects) but noted that the absence of specific site information in the Sacred Lands File does not indicate the absence of Native American cultural resources in any APE. The NAHC also provided a list of Tribes culturally affiliated to the project area, with suggestion to contact the 36 Cahuilla, Luiseño, Cahuilla/Luiseño, Cahuilla/Serrano, Cupeño/Luiseño, and Kumeyaay contacts on the provided list. As the City of Menifee has indicated that they will complete Tribal Consultation for this project, the NAHC information is provided in this report as Confidential Attachment 2. Based on the negative results of the archival and field surveys, no impacts to archaeological resources are anticipated from development of the proposed project. No further measures related to archaeological resources are recommended. However, in the event previously undocumented archaeological resources are identified during earthmoving activities, further work in the area should be halted until the nature and significance of the find can be assessed by a qualified archaeologist. Unanticipated discovery of human remains: If human remains are encountered unexpectedly during implementation of the project, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be of Native American -page i- affiliation, the coroner has 24 hours to notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). The MLD may, with the permission of the landowner, or his or her authorized representative, inspect the site of the discovery of the Native American remains and may recommend to the owner of the person responsible for the excavation work means for treating or disposing, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods. The MLD shall complete their inspection and make their recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access by the landowner to inspect the discovery. -page ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY i I. INTRODUCTION AND SETTING 1 II. PREHISTORIC CONTEXT 4 III. HISTORIC CONTEXT 12 IV. RESEARCH DESIGN 13 V. METHODS 19 VI. RESULTS 20 VII. RECOMMENDED MITIGATION 23 VIII. CERTIFICATION 23 IX. REFERENCES CITED 24 FIGURES 1: Project location: California (south half) U.S.G.S. state map 2 2: Project location: Romoland U.S.G.S. 7.5-minute map 3 PHOTOGRAPH 1: Project property: overview to the southwest 4 TABLE 1: Archaeological sites within 1-mile radius (Eastern Information Center) 20 ATTACHMENTS 1: Personnel Qualifications. 2: Record Search Confirmation Letter CONFIDENTIAL ATTACHMENTS (provided to City of Menifee archaeologist under separate cover) 1: Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Check letter -page iii- I. INTRODUCTION The Menifee Tract 37400 project property consists of 46.9 acres located in Perris Valley, southeast of the community of Romoland and north of the community of Sun City, in the City of Menifee. The site is located southwest of the intersection of McLaughlin and Evans Roads and is within Section 16 of Township 5 N / Range 3W SBBM. The property consists of Assessors Parcels 331-080-005-7, 331-080- 009-12, 331-080-018-21, 331-080-024, 331-080-025, 331-080-027, and 331-080-028. Figures 1 and 2 depict the project location on the Romoland 7.5-minute U.S.G.S. quadrangle map. The property is entirely flat at an elevation of approximately 1425’ AMSL, appearing to have been in agriculture for many years as well as having been recently ripped or disked. Vegetation consists of very sparse, mostly uprooted, remains of straw or hay plantings. Soils are medium brown sandy-silty loams across most of the property with several spots of reddish brown clayey sand loams where there were likely high spots that were leveled for agriculture. There is very little loose rock on the property and no bedrock exposures. Photograph 1 is an overview of the property the northeast corner to the southwest. The Phase I cultural resource survey tasks consisted of archival research, a 1-mile radius record search with the Eastern Information Center (EIC), a field survey, a Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and preparation of this report documenting the negative survey findings. The record search revealed that portions of the property had been previously surveyed and no cultural resources were located. The field survey was completed on December 27, 2017 by Sue Wade of Heritage Resources and encountered no archaeological resources. As a result of the Sacred Lands File search, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) noted negative results for the project property/APE (Area of Potential Effects) but noted that the absence of specific site information in the Sacred Lands File does not indicate the absence of Native American cultural resources in any APE. The NAHC also provided a list of Tribes culturally affiliated to the project area, with suggestion to contact the 36 Cahuilla, Luiseño, Cahuilla/Luiseño, Cahuilla/Serrano, Cupeño/Luiseño, and Kumeyaay contacts on the provided list. As the City of Menifee has indicated that they will complete Tribal Consultation for this project, the NAHC information is provided in this report as Confidential Attachment 2. The project research, field survey, and this report were prepared by Sue A. Wade, Heritage Resources (resume is included in Attachment 1). -page 1- Project Location FIGURE 1: PROJECT LOCATION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA U.S.G.S. MAP 0 miles 8.5 N HERITAGE RESOURCES Project Location FIGURE 2: PROJECT LOCATION: PERRIS AND ROMOLAND 0 feet 2000 U.S.G.S. 7.5-MINUTE MAPS N HERITAGE RESOURCES Photograph 1: Project Property: Overview from northeast corner to the southwest II. PREHISTORIC CONTEXT The following information regarding the prehistoric cultural setting provides context for the archaeological studies completed for the project. The cultural context provides a framework within which to evaluate potential cultural materials for significance. The background information was gathered from sources detailed in the Methods section of this report, particularly the Archival Report for Cultural and Paleontological Resources: City of Menifee, Riverside County (Padon 2010). A. Archaeology Archaeological research in Southern California has undergone several changes in focus, reflecting contemporary research assumptions, since its beginnings in the early 1900s. Although a few surveys, part of the University of California at Berkeley salvage ethnography program, were conducted around the turn of the century, systematic archaeological research in Riverside, Imperial, and San Diego counties began in the 1920s with the efforts of Malcolm Rogers, curator of the San Diego Museum of Man and later with the academic research programs in the 1950s and 1960s undertaken by William Wallace (University of Southern California), Claude Warren, and D.L. True (University of California, Los Angeles). The following review of the archeological research conducted in the project region traces the evolution of archaeological thought initiated by these researchers and presents the understandings about the prehistoric past formed primarily out of the culture history and ecological/processual archaeological theoretical approaches that were employed.
Recommended publications
  • OBSIDIAN: an INTERDISCIPLINARY Bffiliography

    OBSIDIAN: an INTERDISCIPLINARY Bffiliography

    OBSIDIAN: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BffiLIOGRAPHY Craig E. Skinner Kim J. Tremaine International Association for Obsidian Studies Occasional Paper No. 1 1993 \ \ Obsidian: An Interdisciplinary Bibliography by Craig E. Skinner Kim J. Tremaine • 1993 by Craig Skinner and Kim Tremaine International Association for Obsidian Studies Department of Anthropology San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192-0113 International Association for Obsidian Studies Occasional Paper No. 1 1993 Magmas cooled to freezing temperature and crystallized to a solid have to lose heat of crystallization. A glass, since it never crystallizes to form a solid, never changes phase and never has to lose heat of crystallization. Obsidian, supercooled below the crystallization point, remained a liquid. Glasses form when some physical property of a lava restricts ion mobility enough to prevent them from binding together into an ordered crystalline pattern. Aa the viscosity ofthe lava increases, fewer particles arrive at positions of order until no particle arrangement occurs before solidification. In a glaas, the ions must remain randomly arranged; therefore, a magma forming a glass must be extremely viscous yet fluid enough to reach the surface. 1he modem rational explanation for obsidian petrogenesis (Bakken, 1977:88) Some people called a time at the flat named Tok'. They were going to hunt deer. They set snares on the runway at Blood Gap. Adder bad real obsidian. The others made their arrows out of just anything. They did not know about obsidian. When deer were caught in snares, Adder shot and ran as fast as he could to the deer, pulled out the obsidian and hid it in his quiver.
  • HEP Letterhead Template

    HEP Letterhead Template

    HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 619.462.1515 tel 619.462.0552 fax www.helixepi.com July 7, 2017 Mr. Chris Loughridge CLL-01 CLL-Roselle, LLC 3565 Riviera Drive San Diego, California 92109 Subject: 10325 Roselle Street (Project No. 150566) Cultural Resources Report Addendum Dear Mr. Loughridge: This letter report serves as an addendum to the cultural resources report Archaeological Resources on a Lot on Roselle Street, San Diego, California by G. Timothy Gross (May 2009) and the addendum to that report, prepared by Mary Robbins-Wade of HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX) in January 2015. This letter report was prepared in response to a request from City of San Diego (City) staff that an archaeologist and a Native American monitor assess the current condition of the cultural resources within the project site. The proposed project design has not changed since the 2009 submittal. Site conditions within the project footprint have not changed, and the proposed data recovery plan is still adequate to mitigate potential project impacts, as described below. BACKGROUND The Roselle Street project (project) is located within the significant archaeological and cultural resource site known as Ystagua (CA-SDI-4609). The property is located on Roselle Street in Sorrento Valley, in the City of San Diego, in western San Diego County. The parcel is on the alluvial flats along Carroll Canyon Creek in Soledad Canyon, at the end of Roselle Street, although some of the steep valley wall is included in the eastern portion of the property, as well. On July 23, 2009, the project property was designated by the City’s Historical Resources Board (HRB) as HRB Site #924, Village of Ystagua Area #1.
  • HISTORIC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN for The

    HISTORIC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN for The

    FINAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN for the APPROVED SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SUNRISE POWERLINK FINAL ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR SOUTHERN ROUTE, SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management El Centro Field Office 1661 S. 4th Street El Centro, California and SDG&E Special Projects 8315 Century Park Court, CP 21G San Diego, California 92123 Prepared by: David R. Iversen, MA, RPA Arleen Garcia-Herbst, M.A., RPA Don Laylander, M.A. ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 July 2010 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT .................................................................. v 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 1 Reroutes.......................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 9 CONSTRUCTION METHODS ......................................................................................... 9 DESCRIPTION OF AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS ................................................ 10 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................... 11 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION ....................................................................
  • Program of the 75Th Anniversary Meeting

    Program of the 75Th Anniversary Meeting

    PROGRAM OF THE 75 TH ANNIVERSARY MEETING April 14−April 18, 2010 St. Louis, Missouri THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2010 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting 3 Contents 4............... Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5……….….2010 Award Recipients 10.................Maps of the America’s Center 12 ................Maps of Renaissance Grand St. Louis 14 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 15 .............. General Information 18. ............. Featured Sessions 20 .............. Summary Schedule 25 .............. A Word about the Sessions 27............... Program 161................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 167............... Presidents of SAA . 168............... Annual Meeting Sites 169............... Exhibit Map 170................Exhibitor Directory 180................SAA Committees and Task Forces 184………….Index of participants 4 Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting America’s Center APRIL 16, 2010 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2009 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
  • Cultural Resources Survey of the Melrose Drive Extension

    Cultural Resources Survey of the Melrose Drive Extension

    Archaeological and Historical Resources Survey and Evaluation for the Melrose Drive Extension Project, Oceanside, California Prepared for: Seán Cárdenas, RPA Senior Project Manager HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, California 91941 Prepared by: Susan M. Hector, Ph.D. Principal Investigator Sinéad Ní Ghabhláin, Ph.D. Senior Archaeologist And Michelle Dalope Associate Archaeologist December 2009 2034 Corte Del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 (760) 804-5757 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES SURVEY AND EVALUATION FOR THE MELROSE DRIVE EXTENSION PROJECT, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Seán Cárdenas, RPA Senior Project Manager HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, California 91941 Prepared by: Susan M. Hector, Ph.D. Principal Investigator Sinéad Ní Ghabhláin, Ph.D. Senior Archaeologist Michelle Dalope Associate Archaeologist ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte Del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 December 2009 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1 2. PROJECT AREA BACKGROUND ................................................... 5 ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................... 5 PREHISTORIC CULTURAL SEQUENCE .................................................... 6 Terminological Framework ..................................................................... 6 Human Occupation Prior to 11,500 B.P. ...................................................
  • Cultural Resource Report

    Cultural Resource Report

    SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Archaeological Survey, Testing, and Evaluation of Three Bedrock Milling Feature Sites, and Evaluation of One-Built Environment Resource for the Stonemark Estates Project in Unincorporated San Diego County, California Prepared for Stonemark 26, LLC Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants Mav 2008 \ ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY, TESTING, AND EVALUATION OF THREE BEDROCK MILLING FEATURE SITES, AND EVALUATION OF ONE BUILT-ENVIRONMENT RESOURCE FOR THE STONEMARK ESTATES PROJECT IN UNINCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Tentative Map: TM5479 DPLU Environmental Log Number: REZ 06-003 Lead Agency: Department of Planning and Land Use County of San Diego 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B San Diego, Califomia 92123-1666 (858) 694-3754 Contact: Terry Powers Prepared for: Stonemark 26, LLC 5422 Napa Street San Diego, Califomia 92110 Contact: Walid Romaya Prepared by: Michael W. Tuma^ M.S., RPA Signature Caprice D. (KipKip) Hamper, M.A., RPA and Susan Underbrink, MA., RPA SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 625 Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 190 South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 626-240-0587 www.swca.com Contact: Caprice D. (Kip) Harper USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle San Marcos, CA (1968, Photorevised 1983) SWCA Project No. 14004 SWCA CRRD No. 2008-92 May 2008 CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDY STONEMARK ESTATES PROJECT NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA BASE INFORMATION Authors: Michael W. Tuma, Caprice D. (Kip) Harper, and Susan Underbrink Firm: SWCA Environmental Consultants, 625 Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 190 South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 Client/Project
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
  • Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex

    Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex

    Appendix J Cultural Setting - Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex Appendix J: Cultural Setting - Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex The following sections describe the cultural setting in and around the two refuges that constitute the Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex (NWRC) - Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWR and Coachella Valley NWR. The cultural resources associated with these Refuges may include archaeological and historic sites, buildings, structures, and/or objects. Both the Imperial Valley and the Coachella Valley contain rich archaeological records. Some portions of the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWRC have previously been inventoried for cultural resources, while substantial additional areas have not yet been examined. Seventy-seven prehistoric and historic sites, features, or isolated finds have been documented on or within a 0.5- mile buffer of the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWR and Coachella Valley NWR. Cultural History The outline of Colorado Desert culture history largely follows a summary by Jerry Schaefer (2006). It is founded on the pioneering work of Malcolm J. Rogers in many parts of the Colorado and Sonoran deserts (Rogers 1939, Rogers 1945, Rogers 1966). Since then, several overviews and syntheses have been prepared, with each succeeding effort drawing on the previous studies and adding new data and interpretations (Crabtree 1981, Schaefer 1994a, Schaefer and Laylander 2007, Wallace 1962, Warren 1984, Wilke 1976). The information presented here was compiled by ASM Affiliates in 2009 for the Service as part of Cultural Resources Review for the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWRC. Four successive periods, each with distinctive cultural patterns, may be defined for the prehistoric Colorado Desert, extending back in time over a period of at least 12,000 years.
  • Final Archaeological and Historical Investigations for the Energia Sierra Juarez U.S

    Final Archaeological and Historical Investigations for the Energia Sierra Juarez U.S

    FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE ENERGIA SIERRA JUAREZ U.S. GEN-TIE LINE PROJECT JACUMBA, CALIFORNIA Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC MUP 09-008, Log No. 09-22-001 Lead Agency: County of San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use Contact: Patrick Brown 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B San Diego, California 92123 (619) 694-3831 Preparers: Stacey C. Jordan, Ph.D., R.P.A., EDAW, Inc. 1420 Kettner Blvd., Suite 500 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 233-1454 _____________________________ Stacey C. Jordan, Ph.D. With contributions by Ecology & Environment, Inc. Project Proponent: Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC 101 Ash Street, HQ 14 San Diego, California 92101 MayJuly 2010 National Archaeological Data Base Information Authors: Stacey C. Jordan with contributions by Ecology & Environment, Inc. Firm: EDAW, Inc. Client/Project Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Transmission, LLC Proponent: Report Date: July 2010 Report Title: Draft Archaeological and Historical Investigations for the Energia Sierra Juarez U.S. Gen-Tie Line Project, Jacumba, California Type of Study: Intensive Pedestrian Survey and Phase I Testing New Sites: CA-SDI-19480, CA-SDI-19484, CA-SDI-19485, CA-SDI-19486, CA-SDI-19488, CA-SDI-19489, CA-SDI-19490, CA-SDI-19492, CA-SDI-19493, CA-SDI-19494, P-37-30672, P-37-30673, P-37-30674, P-37-30675, P-37-30678 Updated Sites CA-SDI-6119 USGS Quad: In-Ko-Pah Gorge 1975 Acreage: Approximately 73.81 acres Permit Numbers: MUP 09-008, Log No. 09-22-001 Key Words: Intensive pedestrian survey, Phase I testing; ceramic scatter, lithic scatter, lithic reduction area, quarry, CA-SDI-6119, CA-SDI-19480, CA-SDI-19484, CA-SDI-19485, CA-SDI-19486, CA-SDI-19488, CA-SDI-19489, CA-SDI-19490, CA-SDI-19492, CA-SDI-19493, CA-SDI-19494, P-37-30672, P-37-30673, P-37-30674, P-37-30675, P-37-30678 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..............................................................
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 OVERVIEW The Murrieta General Plan is a document required by California law that provides a foundation for City policies and actions. It guides both the physical development of Murrieta and the provision of public infrastructure and services. This General Plan places particular emphasis on economic development and keeps Murrieta in front of current policy topics, including sustainability and health. It is rooted in ten community priorities that were developed through an extensive community involvement process. 1.2 ABOUT THE GENERAL PLAN GENERAL PLAN TOPICS California law requires each city and county to have an adopted General Plan. State law specifies that each jurisdiction’s General Plan address seven “elements,” or topics: land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, and safety. Cities are also allowed to include additional elements on matters of particular importance within that community. The Murrieta General Plan includes the following chapters: Introduction: Purpose and contents of the General Plan, its relationship to California law, background on Murrieta, the planning process that was followed for the General Plan Update, and the community priorities that shaped the General Plan goals and policies. Vision: Context for the General Plan, including major policy initiatives behind the General Plan Update. Land Use Element: Growth, development, redevelopment, conservation, and preservation. Parameters and desired locations for land uses such as residential, commercial, industrial, civic/institutional, parks, and open space are mapped and described. Economic Development Element: Strength and diversity of the economy, jobs, retail, and revenue for public services. 1-1 Circulation Element: Transportation systems within the City that provide for automobile, truck, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian movement.
  • Download Date 06/10/2021 14:34:02

    Download Date 06/10/2021 14:34:02

    Native American Cultural Resource Studies at Yucca Mountain, Nevada (Monograph) Item Type Monograph Authors Stoffle, Richard W.; Halmo, David; Olmsted, John; Evans, Michael Publisher Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Download date 06/10/2021 14:34:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/271453 Native American Cultural Resource Studies at Yucca Mountain, Nevada Richard W. Stoffle David B. Halmo John E. Olmsted Michael J. Evans The Research Report Series of the Institute for Social Research is composed of significant reports published at the completion of a research project. These reports are generally prepared by the principal research investigators and are directed to selected users of this information. Research Reports are intended as technical documents which provide rapid dissemination of new knowledge resulting from ISR research. Native American Cultural Resource Studies at Yucca Mountain, Nevada Richard W. Stoffle David B. Halmo John E. Olmsted Michael J. Evans Institute for Social Research The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 1990 This volume was originally prepared for Science Applications International Corporation of Las Vegas, Nevada (work performed under Contract No. DE- AC08- 87NV10576). Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Unites States Government or any agency thereof.
  • Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Anza Reservoir No. 2 (Project No

    Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Anza Reservoir No. 2 (Project No

    Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Anza Reservoir No. 2 (Project No. D1574) Prepared for: Krieger and Stewart, Inc. Consulting Engineers 3602 University Avenue Riverside, California 92501 For Submittal to: Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road Temecula, California 92590 Prepared by: K.S. Dunbar & Associates, Inc. Environmental Engineering 43575 Vista Del Mar Temecula, California 92590-4314 (951) 699-2082 FAX: (951) 699-2087 Email: [email protected] January 2012 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Anza Reservoir No. 2 (Project No. D1547) Rancho California Water District Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ES-1 Project Description ES-1 Project Summary ES-1 Project Schedule ES-1 Impacts and Mitigation Measures ES-3 Areas of Controversy ES-7 Issues to be Resolved ES-7 Document Availability and Contact Personnel ES-7 1 Introduction 1-1 Introduction 1-1 Project Summary 1-1 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance 1-3 Purposes of an Initial Study 1-3 Contents of an Initial Study 1-4 Intended Uses of the Initial Study 1-4 Lead Agency Decision-Making Process 1-5 Approvals for which this Initial Study will be Used 1-5 2 Project Description 2-1 Project Description 2-1 Soils Storage/Disposal Site 2-1 Construction Equipment 2-1 Project Schedule 2-5 3 Environmental Setting 3-1 Introduction 3-1 Aesthetics 3-1 Agricultural and Forest Resources 3-1 Air Quality 3-1 Climate 3-1 Regional Air Quality 3-3 Air Pollutants 3-3 Ambient Air Quality Standards 3-8 Ambient Air Quality Data 3-9 Emissions Inventory 3-11 Regulatory Setting 3-11 Biological Resources 3-15 Introduction 3-15 Environmental Setting 3-16 Regulatory Setting 3-20 Cultural Resources 3-25 Prehistory 3-25 Ethnography 3-26 K.S.