DOCSLIB.ORG

Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum Lower Marsh Creek, upstream of the confluence with the Portneuf River Department of Environmental Quality February 2010 Final Version Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum February 2010 ii Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum February 2010 Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum Prepared by: Andrew Ray Oregon Institute of Technology 3201 Campus Drive Klamath Falls, Oregon 97601 Pocatello Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality 444 Hospital Way #300 Pocatello, Idaho 83201 iii Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum February 2010 iv Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum February 2010 Acknowledgments The Pocatello Regional Office sincerely thanks all those who have participated in the Portneuf Watershed Advisory Group. Members include: Kim Gower - J. R. Simplot Co., Wilder Hatch - Caribou Soil Conservation District, Kevin Koester – Ag, Jim Mende – Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Hannah Sanger – formerly with Portneuf Greenway Foundation and now with the City of Pocatello, John Sigler - City of Pocatello, Brad Higginson – USDA Forest Service Caribou-Targhee NF, Roger Thompson – SEIFF, Keene Hueftle – SEIEN, Candon Tanaka - Shoshone-Bannock Tribes – WQ, Elliot Traher – Natural Resources Conservation Service , and Lin Whitworth - Bannock County. Input and/or participation by the following individuals was also very valuable: Amy Jenkins and Flint Raben - Idaho Association of Soil Conservation Districts, Sue Skinner, Ben Cope, Tracy Chellis, and Lindsay Guzzo - US EPA Region 10. The DEQ would also like to thank Wendy Greene Lowe with P2 Solutions for facilitating the WAG meetings, Richard Inouye for his continued assistance with sonde data management and summaries and for the cover photo of lower Marsh Creek, and Melissa Thompson for the production of the watershed and subwatershed maps contained herein. v Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum February 2010 Table of Contents Acknowledgments.........................................................................................................v Table of Contents.........................................................................................................vi List of Equations..........................................................................................................ix List of Tablesx List of Figures .............................................................................................................xv List of Appendices .....................................................................................................xix Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Symbols ...................................................................xx Executive Summary ..................................................................................................xxv Subbasin at a Glance........................................................................................... xxv Key Findings ...................................................................................................... xxviii 1. Subbasin Assessment – Watershed Characterization............................................1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................1 Background.......................................................................................................2 Idaho’s Role ......................................................................................................2 1.2 Physical and Biological Characteristics...............................................................3 Hydrology..........................................................................................................4 Climate..............................................................................................................6 Biological Assemblages.....................................................................................6 1.3 Cultural Characteristics ......................................................................................8 2. Subbasin Assessment – Water Quality Concerns and Status ...............................9 2.1 Water Quality Limited Assessment Units Occurring in the Subbasin ................21 About Assessment Units .................................................................................23 2.2 Applicable Water Quality Standards .................................................................24 Beneficial Uses................................................................................................24 Criteria to Support Beneficial Uses..................................................................28 2.3 Pollutant/Beneficial Use Support Status Relationships .....................................32 Temperature....................................................................................................32 Dissolved Oxygen ...........................................................................................32 Sediment.........................................................................................................33 Bacteria...........................................................................................................34 Nutrients..........................................................................................................35 Sediment – Nutrient Relationship ....................................................................36 Floating, Suspended, or Submerged Matter (Nuisance Algae) ........................36 2.4 Summary and Analysis of Existing Water Quality Data....................................37 Flow Characteristics ........................................................................................38 vi Portneuf River TMDL Revision and Addendum February 2010 Water Column Data.........................................................................................40 Biological and Other Data................................................................................72 Status of Beneficial Uses.................................................................................79 Conclusions.....................................................................................................79 2.5 Data Gaps........................................................................................................80 3. Subbasin Assessment–Pollutant Source Inventory .............................................81 3.1 Sources of Pollutants of Concern .....................................................................81 Point Sources..................................................................................................82 Nonpoint Sources............................................................................................85 3.2 Data Gaps........................................................................................................86 Point Sources..................................................................................................86 Nonpoint Sources............................................................................................87 4. Subbasin Assessment – Summary of Past and Present Pollution Control Efforts ...............................................................................................................89 5. Total Maximum Daily Loads ...................................................................................93 5.1 In-stream Water Quality Targets.......................................................................94 Target Selection and Applicable Criteria..........................................................96 Monitoring Points...........................................................................................103 Design Conditions .........................................................................................106 5.2 Estimates of Existing Pollutant Loads and Target Loads ................................109 5.2a Mainstem Portneuf River ..............................................................................109 Sediment.......................................................................................................112 Total Phosphorus ..........................................................................................120 Oil and Grease ..............................................................................................129 5.2b Tributaries ....................................................................................................132 Escherichia coli .............................................................................................132 Sediment.......................................................................................................135 Nutrients........................................................................................................142 Total Nitrogen................................................................................................143 Total Phosphorus ..........................................................................................144 Dissolved Oxygen .........................................................................................149 Construction Storm Water and TMDL Wasteload Allocations ........................150 5.2c Reasonable Assurance.................................................................................151 5.3 Implementation Strategies..............................................................................153 Time Frame...................................................................................................154
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Lava Hot Springs Quadrangle, Bannock County, Idaho
    Idaho Geological Survey Technical Report 01-3 Moscow-Bosie-Pocatello Crane, Link, and Oriel This Technical Report is largely derived from a map originally submitted as part of a masters thesis (Crane, 2000). Its content and format may not conform to agency standards. Geologic Map of the Lava Hot Springs Quadrangle, ST. CHARLES LIMESTONE (Upper member) (Upper Cambrian) -- Light-grey to Bannock County, Idaho Csc medium grey dolomite, thin to thickly bedded, with intraformational conglomerate Sample number Estimated Correlated Perkins and chert. Includes an upper unit of dark-grey thin to medium bedded limestone. Age Regional Bed correlative 1 1 2 Forms slopes and ridges. Thickness 290 m. (Oriel, 1965). Tracy J. Crane , Paul Karl Link , and Steven S. Oriel Correlation of Map Units 1tjc98 8.2+0.8 Ma rv89-10 ST. CHARLES LIMESTONE (Worm Creek Member) (Upper Cambrian) -- 0.534 + 0.104 Ma Csw White to pink quartzite, grading down to medium grey, sandy dolomite and dolomite. Quartzite is medium to thick-bedded, dolomite is medium to thick-bedded and 2tjc98 ~7.5 Ma (?) onn94-629 Qp Qc Qfp Qal crystalline. Forms slopes and ridges. Thickness 290 m. (Oriel, 1965). Of Of Sl Qfp Os Qt Qfg Ql NOUNAN LIMESTONE (Upper Cambrian) -- Medium to light-grey dolomite. 3tjc98 Qal Qfg Lava Hot Quaternary ~7.5 Ma (?) onn94-629 Qp Springs Fault Of Cn Thin-bedded, medium to coarsely crystalline, with thin to medium bedded bands of Qfp Set Os dark-grey silty limestone, calcareous sandstone, and limestone conglomerate. Forms ? Qp Qp slopes. Thickness is 215 m. (Oriel, 1965).
    [Show full text]
  • Geography, Geology, and Mineral Resources of the Portneuf Quadrangle, Idaho
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Roy 0. West, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith, Director Bulletin 803 GEOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE PORTNEUF QUADRANGLE, IDAHO GBOKGE ROGERS MANSFIELD UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1029 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM! THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS U.S.GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 40 CENTS PER COPY '.* *« .. » » CONTENTS Abstract. ___-_------.- ________________--_----_--_----,_________-_ 1 Introduction __ _____________________---_---_-__..__--_____________ I Scope of the work._____________. ______________________________ 1 Location and area of the quadrangle_____-_--_______-__ _________ _ 2 Field work. __----_- ___ ________--__-_-___--__-__ _ ___ _ __. 3 Historical notes. ______________________________________________ 3 The Hayden surveys___________________-______________________ 5 Later geologic work. _____________-_-___-___________________. 6 Geography- __------_ __.__-_____. __ _._ _______ 0 Summary of regional physiographic development. ______________ _ 6 Principal topographic units-_---__-_-_-___-_-_-_-_-___________-_ 7 \ Blackfoot Mountains. _____________________________________ 8 Blackfoot Valley__ __ _ __ _.-______ _ _ ___ ___ ____ _ 8 Chesterfield Range... __ _ ____.__-__ __ _. __ ____ __ _ 8 Soda Springs Hills __ _____________________________________ 10 Portneuf Valley.. ______ __ __ ___ _.._ ___ __ ___ __ _ 10 Portneuf Mountains_-_--__-_---_-__--_-_--------_--____--- 10 Drainage- _.-.-_-___--__-.-.-_---_-_-_-_--------__---__-___--- 11 Rivers _____-_-__-__--______-_-----------------_--_____--- 11 Springs ____-_-_-___--__--__---_-----__---____-________-_- 12 Climate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Portneuf River Watershed Project: Targeting Sustainable Water Quality Improvements
    The Portneuf River Watershed Project: Targeting Sustainable Water Quality Improvements submitted by: Three Rivers Resource Conservation & Development (RC&D) Council, Inc. in cooperation with Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Idaho State University Idaho Department of Environmental Quality City of Pocatello Bannock County J.R. Simplot Company Rapid Creek Research, Inc. Portneuf Soil and Water Conservation District Idaho Association of Soil Conservation Districts Idaho Soil Conservation Commission USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Portneuf Marsh Valley Canal Company Hydrologic Unit Code: The Portneuf River Watershed 8-digit HUC level, 17040208 Impaired Waters: Idaho’s 2002 303(d) list includes five impairments in the Portneuf River Watershed. Impairments in order of decreasing river kilometers impaired include unknown causes (3 water body segments impaired; 408 km), sediments (10 segments; 321 km), pathogens (4 segments; 72 km), bacteria (4 segments; 51.2), and nutrients (2 segments; 34). Contact Information: Mr. Kent Rudeen, Chairperson Three River RC&D Council 1551 Baldy Ave. Suite 4 Pocatello, ID 83201 Phone: (208) 237-4628 ext 102 Fax: (208) 237-3412 Tax Exempt Status: 501(C)(3) Website: www.portneufriver.org Additional material about the watershed can be found at the Portneuf River Ecosystem Project (PREP) site: http://www.isu.edu/bios/prep/ 1 ABSTRACT Here we propose to implement on-the-ground projects and innovative research and outreach in the Portneuf River Watershed. This work will benefit from use and operation of a state-of-the-art and locally supported continuous monitoring network that spans over 80 river kilometers and provides near-real time information on water quality. The very existence of this network enabled us to target the most impaired regions of the watershed and focus restoration efforts accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Public Perceptions of Contaminants in the Lower Portneuf River Valley: a Case Study for Nitrates and Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals
    Sources and Public Perceptions of Contaminants in the Lower Portneuf River Valley: A Case Study for Nitrates and Personal Care Products and Pharmaceuticals by Courtney Alecia Ohr A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Geosciences Idaho State University Spring 2016 Use Authorization In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at Idaho State University, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for inspection. I further state that permission to download and/or print my thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Dean of the Graduate School, Dean of my academic division, or by the University Librarian. It is understood that any copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Signature ___________________________________ Date _______________________________________ ii Committee Approval To the Graduate Faculty: The members of the committee appointed to examine the thesis of COURTNEY ALECIA OHR find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. _____________________________________________ Sarah E. Godsey, Major Advisor _____________________________________________ John A. Welhan, Committee Member _____________________________________________ Danelle Larson, Committee Member _____________________________________________ Kathleen Lohse, Committee Member ____________________________________________ Dewayne Derryberry, Graduate Faculty
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Portneuf Basin Monitoring Project
    Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Portneuf Basin Monitoring Project Prepared by: Three Rivers RC&D Council, Inc. 1551 Baldy Avenue, Suite 4 Pocatello, Idaho 83201 In cooperation with: City of Pocatello Idaho Association of Soil Conservation Districts Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Idaho State University J.R. Simplot Company Version 5.1 1 November 2009 1 Portneuf River QAPP Revision 5.1 1 November 2009 this page intentionally blank 2 Portneuf River QAPP Revision 5.1 1 November 2009 Acknowledgements Authors James T. Brock Andrew M. Ray Greg C. Mladenka Editors Jody Hogan Paula Jones Kelsey Flandro Contributors Lynn VanEvery Candice Hurt Reviewers 1. Colden Baxter, PhD, Idaho State University 2. Jon Herrick, City of Pocatello 3. John W. Sigler, PhD, City of Pocatello 4. Melissa Thompson, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality 5. Richard Inouye, PhD, Idaho State University 6. Greg Mladenka, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality 7. Donald Matheny, US Environmental Protection Agency Cover Photo Courtesy of Katy Flanagan (©2007 Mountain Visions) 3 Portneuf River QAPP Revision 5.1 1 November 2009 A. PROJECT MANAGEMENT A.1. Approvals Roger Chase, Mayor City of Pocatello ________________________________________________Date____________ Bruce Olenick, Regional Administrator Idaho Department of Environmental Quality ________________________________________________Date____________ Kent Rudeen, Chairperson Three Rivers RC&D Council ________________________________________________Date____________ 4 Portneuf River QAPP Revision
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Water Quality Impacts Associated with FMC and Simplot Phosphate Ore Processing Facilities, Pocatello, Idaho
    Ground Water Quality Technical Report No. 21 Evaluation Of Water Quality Impacts Associated With FMC And Simplot Phosphate Ore Processing Facilities, Pocatello, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Technical Services Division January 2004 Cover photo: stream gaging at transect T-3 facing south, with the Simplot facility in the background. Evaluation Of Water Quality Impacts Associated With FMC and Simplot Phosphate Ore Processing Facilities, Pocatello, Idaho by Joe Baldwin, Bruce Wicherski, Clyde Cody, and Robert Taylor Technical Services Division January 2004 Department of Environmental Quality 1410 N. Hilton Boise, Idaho 83706 This blank page allows correct double-sided printing. Table of Contents Table of Contents v List of Tables vi List of Figures vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xi INTRODUCTION 1 PROBLEM STATEMENT 1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES 1 DATA SOURCES 2 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION 3 DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES AND SITE HISTORY 3 REGIONAL HYDROGEOLOGY 4 LOCAL HYDROGEOLOGY 5 RIVER SAMPLING 6 INITIAL PORTNEUF RIVER TRANSECT DATA COLLECTION 7 ADDITIONAL RIVER TRANSECT DATA 8 RIVER TRANSECT SAMPLING RESULTS 9 CONTAMINANT LOADING ANALYSIS 10 REGIONAL GROUND WATER 10 BATISTE SPRING AND CHANNEL 11 CITY OF POCATELLO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 11 SIMPLOT WASTEWATER LAND APPLICATION SITE 12 FMC/SIMPLOT FACILITY GROUND WATER 12 Quality 12 Flow and Loading Calculations 12 PHOSPHORUS AND NITRATE CONCENTRATIONS AND LOADS IN THE PORTNEUF RIVER 13 REGIONAL GROUND WATER DISCHARGE AND LOADING 13 BATISTE SPRING DISCHARGE AND LOADING 14 CITY OF POCATELLO WASTEWATER
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources in the Portneuf River Basin, Idaho
    WATER INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 16 A RECONNAISSANCE OF THE WATER RESOURCES IN THE PORTNEUF RIVER BASIN, IDAHO by R.F. Norvitch and A.L. Larson Un ited States Geological Survey Prepared by the United States Geological Survey in Cooperation with Idaho Department of Reclamation Published by Idaho Department of Reclamation R. Keith Higginson State Reclamation Engineer June 1970 CONTENTS Page Abstract ... ... ...................... .. ........... .. .... .. J Introduction ..... ... .. ..... .. .................... .... ......2 Purpose aml scope ........... .... ......... .... .. .... ... ... 2 Previous studies .. .. ...... .. .... ..... .. .. ............. .. .1 Acknowledgments ...... ... .... .... ... ........ .. ......... .4 Numbering system .. .... .. ......... .. .. .. ........ ... ... .. .4 Use of metric units . ...... .. .................... ... .. ...... .4 Physiography ...... ... ........ ..... ........... ... ... .. ..6 Topography and land forms ... .. ..... .. .... ... ... .. ... ...6 Drainage . ............. .. ...... ..... .......... .... .......7 Upper valley ....... ..... .................. ...... .........7 Lower valley ............ ..... .. ... .... ... .... .... ..8 Clirnate ......... ..... ...... ........ .... ....... .. .....8 Geologic units .u,d their water beanng charact1:ristics ..... ....... .. 11 Watcr resources . ......... .. .. .. .. ...... ..... ..... .. .. 16 Sou recs . .... ..... 16 Ground water ..... .... ...... ................ .... ......... 18 Water level fluctuations .. .. ....... ..... ......... 19 Well and
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Trail-Bear Lake Scenic Byway
    OREGON TRAIL-BEAR LAKE SCENIC BYWAY Southeast Idaho, from the Utah border, through Soda Springs and west to McCammon, has been traversed by travelers since before recorded history. First by various tribes of natives on their way to “Po-Ha-Ba,” the healing waters of the hot springs at Lava Hot Springs, later by fur trappers, then emigrants on the Oregon Trail. The Union Pacific Railroad opened the area to freight and passengers circa 1880, McCammon was a stop on “The Gold Road,” the stagecoach and supply road from Salt Lake City to the gold mines in Montana. This guide starts at the Utah/Idaho border and will guide you to each site along the byway. If you are starting in McCammon follow it from the bottom up. 1. Bear Lake Portal and Overlook Often called The Caribbean of the Rockies for its intense turquoise blue water. Bear Lake is home to several species of fish found nowhere else in the world, such as the Bonneville Cisco. During pioneer times, Bear Lake was the site of Mountain Men Rendezvous' and fur trading. Year round recreation includes swimming, boating, fishing, hiking, biking, and snowmobiling. Just north of the Utah line on U.S. 89 at Milepost 2.2. 42° 1'59.23"N, 111°23'49.77"W 2. Gutzon Borglum Monument Gutzon Borglum was a prolific American sculptor best know for his presidents' sculptures on Mount Rushmore, South Dakota. Borglum was born in St. Charles, Idaho in 1867. His marble head sculpture of Abraham Lincoln is on display in the Capitol Rotunda.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Assessment: a Note of Explanation
    EASTERN MICHAUD FLATS CONTAMINATION POCATELLO, BANNOCK COUNTY AND POWER COUNTY, IDAHO EPA FACILITY ID: IDD984666610 MARCH 21, 2005 THE ATSDR PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT: A NOTE OF EXPLANATION This Public Health Assessment was prepared by ATSDR pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) section 104 (i)(6) (42 U.S.C. 9604 (i)(6)), and in accordance with our implementing regulations (42 C.F.R. Part 90). In preparing this document, ATSDR has collected relevant health data, environmental data, and community health concerns from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state and local health and environmental agencies, the community, and potentially responsible parties, where appropriate. In addition, this document has previously been provided to EPA and the affected states in an initial release, as required by CERCLA section 104 (i)(6)(H) for their information and review. The revised document was released for a 30-day public comment period. Subsequent to the public comment period, ATSDR addressed all public comments and revised or appended the document as appropriate. The public health assessment has now been reissued. This concludes the public health assessment process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR which, in the agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry.................................................... Julie L. Gerberding, M.D., M.P.H., Administrator Thomas Sinks, Ph.D., M.S., Acting Director Division of Health Assessment and Consultation…. ..................................................................... William Cibulas, Jr., Ph.D., Director Sharon Williams-Fleetwood, Ph.D., Deputy Director Community Involvement Branch ..................................................................................................... Germano E.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Fishing 2019–2021 Seasons & Rules
    Idaho Fishing 2019–2021 Seasons & Rules 1st Edition 2019 Free Fishing Day June 8, 2019 • June 13, 2020 • June 12, 2021 idfg.idaho.gov Craig Mountain Preserving and Sustaining Idaho’s Wildlife Heritage For over 25 years, we’ve worked to preserve and sustain Idaho’s wildlife heritage. Help us to leave a legacy for future generations, give a gift today! • Habitat Restoration • Wildlife Conservation • Public Access and Education For more information visit IFWF.org or call (208) 334-2648 YOU CAN HELP PREVENT THE SPREAD OF NOXIOUS WEEDS IN IDAHO! 1. Cleaning boats, trailers and watercraft after leaving a water body 2. Pumping the bilge of your boat before entering a water body 3. Cleaning boating and fishing gear from any plant material 4. Reporting infestations to your County Weed Superintendent CALL 1-844-WEEDSNO WWW.IDAHOWEEDAWARENESS.COM DIRECTOR MOORE’S OPEN LETTER TO THE HUNTERS, ANGLERS AND TRAPPERS OF IDAHO y 6-year-old grandson caught his first steelhead last year. It was a wild fish and he had Mto release it. We had quite a discussion of why Grandpa got to keep the fish that I had caught earlier, but he had to release his. In spite of my explanation about wild fish vs. hatchery-raised fish, he was confused. Although ultimately, he understood this, when his dad caught a wild steelhead and he had to release it, as well. Both of my grandsons insisted on taking a picture of us with my fish. These moments in the field with our families and friends are the most precious of memories that I hope to continue to have for several decades as a mentor of anglers and hunters, demonstrating “how to harvest” and more importantly how to responsibly interact with wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Balance and Pumping Capacity of the Lower Portneuf River Valley Aquifer, Bannock County, Idaho
    Water Balance and Pumping Capacity of the Lower Portneuf River Valley Aquifer, Bannock County, Idaho John A. Welhan Idaho Geological Survey Morrill Hall, Third Floor Staff Report 06-5 University of Idaho July 2006 Moscow, Idaho 83844-3014 Water Balance and Pumping Capacity of the Lower Portneuf River Valley Aquifer, Bannock County, Idaho John A. Welhan Staff reports present timely information for public distribution. This publication may not conform to the agency's standards. Idaho Geological Survey Morrill Hall, Third Floor Staff Report 06-5 University of Idaho July 2006 Moscow, Idaho 83844-3014 CONTENTS Summary...................................................................................................... 1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 2 Background and Scope.................................................................... 2 Hydrogeologic Setting and Previous Work..................................... 3 The 1993-94 Southern Aquifer Water Balance........................................... 6 Ground-Water Recharge to the Northern Aquifer....................................... 8 Overall Aquifer Water Balance................................................................... 9 Discussion and Conclusions........................................................................ 13 The Impact of Drought.................................................................... 13 Long-Term Storage Trends............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Hydrology and Hydraulics
    Portneuf River Vision Document Appendix C – Hydrology and Hydraulics Appendix C Hydrology and Hydraulics Table of Contents 1. Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................. C‐2 2. Previous Federal Studies and Other Sources ..................................................................... C‐2 3. Other Relevant Studies ....................................................................................................... C‐3 4. Current Condition Description ........................................................................................... C‐4 4.1 General Environment ................................................................................................ C‐4 4.2 Portneuf River by Reach ........................................................................................... C‐5 4.3 Ecosystem Conditions ............................................................................................... C‐5 5. Pocatello Unit Flood Control Project Description .............................................................. C‐6 6. Study Area Hydrology ......................................................................................................... C‐6 6.1 Basin Description ...................................................................................................... C‐6 6.2 Climate ...................................................................................................................... C‐7 6.3 Streamflow Characteristics
    [Show full text]