DOCSLIB.ORG

Part Two: Pondera County Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part Two: Pondera County Profile Pondera County Growth Policy Draft – February 2011 PART TWO: PONDERA COUNTY PROFILE This section provides a summary of the existing characteristics and projected future trends of Pondera County. More detailed information is included in the separate “Inventory of Existing Characteristics for Pondera County, Conrad, and Valier.” OVERVIEW Pondera County covers diverse physical terrain from the Continental Divide as its western boundary to the rolling prairie that has become productive agricultural lands in the east. Conrad is the county seat, located on Interstate 15. Valier is the only other incorporated community. Brady and Dupuyer are unincorporated communities. About 15.5 percent of Pondera County is in the Blackfeet Reservation, and most of that area is tribal land which is not subject to this Growth Policy. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The following is a brief timeline of major events in Pondera County and is not intended as a complete history. 1700s Tribes of the Blackfoot Confederacy – Piegan, Bloods, and Siksika (Blackfeet) – claim the area known today in Montana as the Hi‐Line and including Pondera County Old North Trail – which runs roughly parallel to U.S. Highway 89 was a trail of conquest that Confederacy Indians used to travel as far north as Calgary, Alberta and as far south as New Mexico. 1806 Meriwether Lewis and his men travel up the Marias and Missouri Rivers on their way back from the coast. 1835 Government sends exploring parties to determine a practical railroad route. 1837 Small pox epidemic kills 6,000 Blackfeet, two‐thirds of the population 1855 Treaty with the Blackfeet Nation signed. Boundaries of the reservation were eventually pushed back from the Musselshell to the Sun river and then to Birch Creek and Marias 1868 Brothers Charles E. and William E. Conrad begin building a business empire. Working as clerks for I. G. Baker, owner of trading companies, they eventually became partners with Baker and then in 1874 they bought the company. Were involved in overland trade, banking, ranching, mining, and real estate. Ended up owning much of the land that is known as Pondera County. 1874 Charlie Thomas and Joe Kipp took up a ranch near present day Dupuyer and started raising 3 Pondera County Growth Policy Draft – February 2011 cattle 1875 Fort Conrad established by Charles Conrad in 1875. Goods flow between Fort Benton and Fort Conrad and along the Whoop‐Up Trail until around 1892. 1877 Town of Dupuyer established 1886 Brothers William G. and Charles Conrad purchase 11 sections and begin building what will become the Conrad Investment Company holdings of more than 312 sections (200,000 acres) by 1898. The land is named the Seven Block Ranch and eventually runs 10,000 head of cattle. They start the irrigation projects that will become the Pondera County Canal and Reservoir Company. 1888 Townsite of Dupuyer is platted. 1889 Old Pondera town was located a mile or so from present‐day Conrad and had had one store, one rooming house, two saloons, a section house, a school house, and a water tank. 1890 Great Falls and Canada Railroad makes first run from Great Falls to Lethbridge, Canada. 1901 Great Falls and Canada Railroad sold to Great Northern and new tracks run through present‐day Conrad. 1902 620 acre town‐site of Conrad is laid out, and buildings from Old Pondera are moved to Conrad. Conrad is named after William G. Conrad. 1904 First school built in Conrad 1908 Conrad is incorporated September 24, 1908. 1908‐09 Cargill family from Wisconsin purchases the Seven Block Ranch, including the initial irrigation system of the Pondera County Canal and Reservoir Company. W.S. Cargill and other investors developed the irrigation project that includes Lake Frances. 1909 Valier Townsite Company established and town of Valier laid out for 3,000 people. Within five months, 600 people lived in Valier. 1909 Conrad is incorporated September 24, 1909. 1912 Valier Library constructed. 1916 Conrad has grown to a population of 1500. 1919 Pondera County established 1929 Conrad Library completed 1948 Pondera County Canal and Reservoir Company is completed and consists of two storage reservoirs and 360 miles of canal and lateral ditches. 1950 Conrad High School Completed 4 Pondera County Growth Policy Draft – February 2011 PHYSICAL SETTING Pondera County sits on the east side of the Continental Divide, rising all the way to the divide, and surface water drains into the Marias River. Vegetation varies across the county with elevation and precipitation. According to the Soil Survey, Conrad averages 11.91 inches of precipitation annually and Valier averages 12.7 inches. By contrast, the higher elevation western reaches receive 60-85 inches per year. LAND USE Pondera County is 1,638.6 square miles in land area or 1,048,704 acres. A large portion of Pondera County, that part north of Birch Creek excluding the National Forest, is within the boundaries of the Blackfeet Reservation. The Reservation includes 254 square miles of Pondera County or 15.5 percent of the county. Within the Reservation, there are tribal lands and private lands as well as the unincorporated settlement of Heart Butte (population 698 in year 2000). Privately owned deeded lands constitute 31 percent of the Reservation in Pondera County. These private lands are subject to this Growth Policy and the Pondera County Subdivision Regulations while the tribal lands are not. Agriculture is the overwhelmingly predominant use of private land in the unincorporated areas of Pondera County. Revenue Department data indicate that agricultural land and related farmsteads account for 99% of the private land in unincorporated Pondera County. A portion of the Bob Marshall Wilderness Area is located within Pondera County, in the far southwestern corner of the county in the Lewis and Clark National Forest west of Swift Reservoir. The Bob Marshall Wilderness is part of the 109 million-acre National Wilderness Preservation System. Motorized equipment and equipment used for mechanical transport is generally prohibited on all federal lands designated as wilderness. As of June 2010, there were 71,526 acres under the CRP program in Pondera County. This amounts to 6.8% of the entire county. Only the City of Conrad and the Town of Valier have zoning and the unincorporated area of Pondera County is not zoned. Pondera County also has subdivision regulations, flood plain regulations, and sewage disposal system regulations. The county-owned airport near Conrad has a designated airport influence area with associated land use standards. There has been very little residential development in the unincorporated areas of Pondera County. Most residential development has occurred in the communities of Conrad, Valier, Brady, and Dupuyer. The Hutterite colonies are the other locations where residential development is most concentrated. New rural land uses, such as wind farms, may entail relatively unprecedented economic and land use dynamics leading to changes in the landscape. 5 Pondera County Growth Policy Draft – February 2011 POPULATION Population in Pondera County grew 12% from 5,741 persons at the time of the first decennial census of the county in 1920 to 6,424 persons in 2000. Growth occurred quickly in the first few decades, and then population began to decline in the 1960s. Population density is 3.95 persons per square mile in Pondera County and 6.2 for Montana With the exception of Heart Butte, the county population is older than the state’s overall population. In 2000, median age in the county ranged from 21.3 years in Heart Butte to 42.7 years in Valier. Median age for Montana was 37.5 and for the nation 35.3. The 2008 census estimates indicate the population continues to get proportionately older, with an estimated median age of 42.9 in Pondera County compared to 39.3 for the state overall. In 2000, Pondera County had the eighth highest percentage of persons ages 21 and over with a disability among Montana’s 56 counties. The overall population of the county is projected to decrease over the next 20 years, according to projections released from the State of Montana. Population would decrease by nearly 18% from 6,424 in 2000 to 5,280 in 2030. Considering that the population on the Blackfeet Reservation is increasing, the projected population loss off-reservation is likely to be more pronounced. HOUSING TRENDS According to the 2000 census there were 2,834 housing units in Pondera County, of which 1,332 were in Conrad, 275 were in Valier, and 185 were in Heart Butte. Data from the Montana Department of Revenue (which would not include housing on tribal lands) shows that new housing starts in the nine year period from 1999 to 2008 as slow in Conrad (10 new units) and the rest of the unincorporated area of Pondera County (32 new units). Housing starts may be on the upswing. At the time of this report, there were 12 homes under construction in the unincorporated areas of Pondera County. Of the total single and mobile housing units, 17% are in “Poor” (barely usable) or worse in Pondera County (including the incorporated municipalities). These data are based on appraisal data, which does not include data on Indian trust land. Housing units in “Fair” condition (marked deterioration and needs much repair) or worse condition comprises another 25% of all housing units the county. Despite low housing prices compared to other locations in Montana and the nation, residents still face a high housing cost burden. Nearly one in four households in Pondera County expends 30% or more of their income on housing. The only community with licensed senior and special needs housing in Pondera County is Conrad. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS Agriculture is a fundamental component of the Pondera County economy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EARLY DAYS in the FOREST SERVICE Volume 2
    EARLY DAYS IN THE FOREST SERVICE Volume 2 Compiled and Edited by Jessie Thompson 1955 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Northern Region Missoula, Montana TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Cover Photo: Northern Region Fire Warehouse, 240 West Pine, Missoula, Montana, about 1922. Stories By: JACK CLACK (Retired 1933) "A Trip Down the Flathead" JACK CLACK "Battle of Belton" CLYDE P. FICKES (Retired 1948) "Forest Ranger, 1907" LEON C. HURTT (Retired 1951) "Transportation, Then and Now" DAVID LAKE (Retired 1940) "Early Day Experiences" DAVID LAKE "The Snowy Mountain Fire of 1900" ROY A. PHILLIPS (Retired 1951) "Recollections" G.I. PORTER (Retired 1942) "The Major and the Miner" G.I. PORTER "The Ranger's Wife" G.I. PORTER "Reminiscences of G.I. Porter" CHARLIE E. POWELL (Retired 1955) "Recollections" THEODORE SHOEMAKER (Retired 1938) "Fighting Forest Fires -- Then and Now" THEODORE SHOEMAKER "Memories" K.D. SWAN (Retired 1941) "Musselshell Reminiscences" RYLE TEED (Retired 1952) "Reminiscences of Early Days In The Forest Service" C.S. WEBB (Retired 1914) "Some Incidents Occuring During My Employment With The U.S. Forest Service, 1913- 1949" WALLACE W. WEBER (Retired 1949) "Rafting the Flathead" WILLIAM G. WEIGLE "Reminisces" Index (omitted from the online edition) LIST OF FIGURES 1. Jack Clack, center, then deputy supervisor of Flathead National Forest, 1915, on the trail up the South Fork of the Flathead River in Montana. 2. First Prefire Ranger Meeting, Bitterroot-Idaho National Forest, 1907. Major Frank Fenn, Supervisor. 3. Old Store Building, 1927, Diamond City, Montana, Confederate Gulch. Helena National Forest. 4. Libby-Troy Road in Montana, 1915, Kootenai National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Métis Cultural Recovery Oral History Project—Bibliography
    Métis Cultural Recovery Oral History Project—Bibliography This bibliography includes oral histories from the Montana Historical Society’s Métis Cultural Recovery Oral History Project. Where possible, audio format is noted. The collection is divided between oral histories that have been transcribed and those that have not. Where possible, length of typed transcription is noted. ___________________________________________________________________________ Transcribed: Alice Gleason and Ripley Hugo interview, 1995. Métis Cultural Recovery Oral History Project (OH 1906). Montana Historical Society Archives. Audio tape(s). 25-page transcript. Alice Gleason was born in Muscatine, Iowa, in 1905, the daughter of Joe and Maggie Rosenfelt. The family moved to Choteau from Billings, Montana, in the 1930s. She talks about dances; prejudice against the Métis; Indian children being sent to boarding school at Holy Family Mission; teaching at the Kalma and Bellview schools; early history of the Métis in Montana; and Matt Hansen’s research. Carolyn Harsh interview, 1994. Métis Cultural Recovery Oral History Project (OH 1909). Montana Historical Society Archives. No tape. Transcribed from shorthand, 5 pages. Carolyn Peterson Harsh was born in Farmington, Montana, the daughter of Sheriff Albert Oliver Peterson and his wife, Sophie. She speaks of the dances at Twin Lakes, west of Choteau, and other parties; her father’s homestead and trapping; and her childhood. Catherine Belgarde interview, 1980. Métis Cultural Recovery Oral History Project (OH 1894). Montana Historical Society Archives. Audio tape(s). 35-page transcript. In this interview Catherine Belgarde discusses her early childhood in Edmonton; moving to Lewistown, Montana; washing clothes and dishes as a young women in a mining town named Giltridge; her two marriages (both men died); her work at the Boulder School and Hospital; her parents meeting; her stay at the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Genetics Important Plant 2016 Plant Conservation Conference Areas for Montana by Peter Lesica, Clark Fork Chapter by Peter Lesica, Clark Fork Chapter
    Volume 29 No. 3 | Spring 2016 elseyaNewsletter of the Montana Native Plant Society Kelseya uniflora K ill. by Bonnie Heidel Approved: Two More Focus on Genetics Important Plant 2016 Plant Conservation Conference Areas for Montana By Peter Lesica, Clark Fork Chapter By Peter Lesica, Clark Fork Chapter he Montana Native Plant Society, along with the U.S. Forest Service, the MONTANA NOW HAS TWO NEW University of Montana Division of Biological Sciences, the Montana Natural IMPORTANT PLANT AREAS (IPAs), THeritage Program and the Natural Resources Conservation Service, hosted the approved during the February Plant Ninth Montana Plant Conservation Conference at the University of Montana in mid- Conservation Conference, bringing the February. More than 100 people attended, about half being MNPS members. total number of state IPAs to nine. Both The first day was dedicated to learning about population genetics and how new locales are in the southwest part of our molecular-based methods can help inform plant conservation. The three talks in the state — one is above treeline and the morning were conceptual in nature. Fred Allendorf from UM provided a refresher course other in a valley bottom. Descriptions on population genetics that helped provide a context for later talks. Loreen Allphin from of the new new IPAs, as well as of the Brigham Young University followed Fred, focusing on the importance of genetic variation previously approved sites, can be found to rare plant conservation and how using on the Montana Native Plant Society molecular markers can inform these efforts. new molecular-based website (http://www.mtnativeplants.org/ Matt Lavin from MSU ended the morning methods can help inform Important_Plant_Areas).
    [Show full text]
  • Surface. Water Supply of the United States 1919-1920 Part Vi
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 506 SURFACE. WATER SUPPLY OF THE UNITED STATES 1919-1920 PART VI. MISSOURI RIVER BASIN NATHAN C. GROVER, Chief Hydraulic Engineer W. A. IAMB, ROBERT FOLLANSBEE, W. G. HOYT, and R. C. RICE District Engineers Prepared in cooperation with the STATES OF MONTANA, WYOMING, IOWA, COLORADO, AND KANSAS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS ,,.;. ,..:. .. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE ' 'WASHINGTON, D. C. - .:: - :> -AT 35 CENTS PER COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPY FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAY 11, 1922 CONTENTS. Page. Authorization and scope of work...................".....................-.. 9 Definition of terms......................................................... 10 Explanation of data........................................................ H Accuracy of field data and computed results................................ 12 Cooperation.............................................................. 13- Division of work.......................................................... 15 Gaging-station records...................................................... 16 Missouri River proper.................................................. 16 Beaverhead River at Barratts, Mont................................ 16 Jefferson River near Silverstar, Mont............................... 18 Missouri River at Fort
    [Show full text]
  • EIS Fairfield to Dupuyer
    STPP 3-2(27)28; CN 4051 Final Environmental Impact Statement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document presents the results of the Corridor Study conducted for the portion of U.S. Highway 89 (US 89) from Fairfield, in Teton County, to Dupuyer, in Pondera County. This document was prepared in conformance with the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements, and contains the information required for an Environmental Impact Statement. This document identifies potential social, economic, and environmental impacts that would result from the proposed reconstruction, widening, and realignment of US 89 in this corridor. Mitigation measures to address potential adverse impacts are also identified. Proposed Action MDT is proposing to reconstruct, widen, and realign US 89 from approximately 5.8 km (3.6 mi) north of Fairfield (approximately 32 km (20± mi.) west-northwest of Great Falls) to a location approximately 0.6 km (0.4 mi) south of Dupuyer, for a total length of approximately 74.3 km (46.2 mi). Existing bridges, culverts, and stockpasses would be replaced, and new right-of-way will be required throughout the corridor. The Preferred Alternative would provide a 10.8 m (36 ft) paved width to include two 3.6 m (12 ft) driving lanes, and 1.8 m (6.0 ft) shoulders. Purpose and Need MDT has identified the US 89 corridor for improvements generally due to its outdated design, including inadequate passing opportunities, narrow shoulders, sharp curves, and poor operations due to the mix of recreational vehicles, trucks, and passenger vehicles. Another factor in its identification for improvements is the corridor’s attractiveness as a recreational route.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Record of Decision: NCDE Grizzly Bear Forest Amendment
    United States Department of Agriculture Record of Decision for the Forest Plan Amendments to Incorporate Habitat Management Direction for the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem Grizzly Bear Population Helena-Lewis and Clark National Forest, Kootenai National Forest, Lolo National Forest Forest Service Northern Region December 2018 Cover photo credit: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Record of Decision for the Forest Plan Amendments to Incorporate Relevant Direction from the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem Draft Grizzly Bear Conservation Strategy Helena-Lewis and Clark, Kootenai, and Lolo National Forests Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Officials: William Avey, Forest Supervisor Helena-Lewis and Clark National Forests 2880 Skyway Drive Helena, MT 59602 telephone: 406-449-5201 Chad Benson, Acting Forest Supervisor Kootenai National Forest 31374 U.S. Highway 2 Libby, MT 59923-3022 telephone: 406-293-6211 Joe Alexander, Acting Forest Supervisor Lolo National Forest 24 Fort Missoula Road Missoula MT 59803 telephone 406-329-3750 i In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutcracker Notes Cyndi Smith, Interim Director Canmore, Alberta FOUNDATION NEWS Robert Keane, Interim Associate Director Interim Director’S Message
    Issue No. 34: Spring 2018 nutcrackerJournal of the Whitebark Pine Ecosystem notes Foundation September 20-22, 2018 Community Center, Stanley, Idaho Litterfall in Whitebark Pine Forests after Mountain Pine Beetle Limber Pine Monitoring along Photo courtesy of Rob Mutch Ecosystem Photography Montana’s Rocky Mountain Front By Dave Hanna, The Nature Conservancy The limber pine trees at the grassland ecotone are also cultural On the Rocky Mountain Front along the eastern edge of the features on the landscape. Many of the individual limber pines Crown of the Continent, limber pine occurs from lower to upper are centuries old, and were shaped by native peoples managing treeline. At lower treeline, along the ecotone with the grasslands fire and buffalo. These forests are also important for an array of of the Great Plains, these limber pine forests occur along the wildlife, including wintering elk and deer, grizzly bears, cavity ecological margin, in a mixed grassland, savanna, and woodland nesting birds and, of course, Clark’s nutcrackers. matrix. LIMBER continued on page 4 OUR MISSION The Whitebark Pine Ecosystem Foundation is a science-based nonprofit organization dedicated to counteracting the decline of whitebark pine and enhancing knowledge of its ecosystems. BOARD Inside Nutcracker Notes Cyndi Smith, Interim Director Canmore, Alberta FOUNDATION NEWS Robert Keane, Interim Associate Director Interim Director’s Message............................................................................2 Missoula, Montana Canada Director’s News................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Geology of the Birch Creek-Sun River Area, Northwestern Montana
    OIL AND GAS GEOLOGY OF THE BIRCH CREEK-SUN RIVER AREA, NORTHWESTERN MONTANA. By EUGENE STEBINGER. INTRODUCTION. The area described in this paper lies adjacent to the front range of the Rocky Mountains in northwestern Montana and is part of a large region in the northern Great Plains of the United States and Canada which seems to deserve consideration as prospective territory for oil and gas development. The thick bodies of Upper Cretaceous shale, the sands of which have yielded the greater part of the oil produced in Wyoming and Colorado and large quantities of gas in Alberta, underlie much of this region, in many places at depths that can be reached by the drill. The outcrops of .these Cretaceous forma­ tions afford unquestionable evidence of being petroliferous, so that drilling in places of favorable structure, .such as on well-developed domes or anticlines, seems to offer a reasonable chance of success. It is certain that the plains of northwestern Montana can not be classed as barren of oil until a considerable number of the favorable lo­ calities have been carefully drilled. Random drilling regardless of the lay of the rocks, such as has been undertaken up to the present time, has been uniformly unsuccessful. Moreover, even though the region as a whole should eventually prove to contain fair amounts of oil, the area actually underlain by commercial pools might comprise much less than 1 per cent of the total area underlain by the Cretaceous formations, so that the chances of success by random locations are very slight. Predictions of oil pools from a formation some hundreds of miles beyond localities where it has already proved productive, on the basis of identical geologic age and kind of rock and un­ doubted indications that it is petroliferous, have often proved unwarranted in the Rocky Mountain region, especially in parts of southern Wyoming and western Colorado, and also in other parts of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement
    STPP 3-2(27)28; CN 4051 Final Environmental Impact Statement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document presents the results of the Corridor Study conducted for the portion of U.S. Highway 89 (US 89) from Fairfield, in Teton County, to Dupuyer, in Pondera County. This document was prepared in conformance with the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements, and contains the information required for an Environmental Impact Statement. This document identifies potential social, economic, and environmental impacts that would result from the proposed reconstruction, widening, and realignment of US 89 in this corridor. Mitigation measures to address potential adverse impacts are also identified. Proposed Action MDT is proposing to reconstruct, widen, and realign US 89 from approximately 5.8 km (3.6 mi) north of Fairfield (approximately 32 km (20± mi.) west-northwest of Great Falls) to a location approximately 0.6 km (0.4 mi) south of Dupuyer, for a total length of approximately 74.3 km (46.2 mi). Existing bridges, culverts, and stockpasses would be replaced, and new right-of-way will be required throughout the corridor. The Preferred Alternative would provide a 10.8 m (36 ft) paved width to include two 3.6 m (12 ft) driving lanes, and 1.8 m (6.0 ft) shoulders. Purpose and Need MDT has identified the US 89 corridor for improvements generally due to its outdated design, including inadequate passing opportunities, narrow shoulders, sharp curves, and poor operations due to the mix of recreational vehicles, trucks, and passenger vehicles. Another factor in its identification for improvements is the corridor’s attractiveness as a recreational route.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E. Priority Watersheds
    Helena – Lewis and Clark National Forest Proposed Action – Revised Forest Plan Appendix E. Priority Watersheds Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Watershed Condition Framework ............................................................................................ 1 Restoration of Impaired Waterbodies ...................................................................................... 4 Protection of Municipal Watersheds ........................................................................................ 5 Conservation Watershed Network ........................................................................................... 7 List of Tables Table 1. Number of 6th level watersheds rated in each condition class using the watershed condition framework ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Table 2. Current watershed condition framework priority watersheds on the HLC NF* .................... 3 Table 3. 303(d) listed stream segments by GA. ................................................................................. 4 Table 4. Municipal and source waters of the HLC NF......................................................................... 6 Table 5. Conservation watershed network subwatersheds west of the continental divide on the HLC NF ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Water Supply Outlook Report January 1St, 2020
    Montana Water Supply Outlook Report January 1st, 2020 What is the difference between Water Year Precipitation and Snowpack? It has been an interesting year so far weather-wise in the state of Montana, and a little bit of everything has been thrown our way. As of January 1st, there is a stark contrast between snowpack for this date and how much precipitation we have received since October 1st (beginning of Water Year 2020). While snowpack remains near or even above normal in some regions, those same areas have precipitation totals that are below normal for this date. Snow totals this year were boosted by early season snowfall in late September and October. However, the persistently dry conditions in November and early December resulted in well below average precipitation since then. It is best to think of these two data types like this; Water Year Precipitation is the total amount of water we have received in the form of rain and snow, and Snow Water Equivalent (or snowpack) is how much of that water has been stored as snow on the ground for runoff in the spring and summer. While snowpack may seem to be in good shape on January 1st in some regions, below-normal precipitation means there is a component in the hydrologic system that is lacking, which could potentially have impacts in the future if the deficits persist. 1 Page For more water supply and resource management information, contact: Lucas Zukiewicz Water Supply Specialist Federal Building 10 East Babcock, Room 443 Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone 406-587-6843 [email protected] http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/mt/snow/ Montana Water Supply Outlook Report as of January 1st, 2020 How Forecasts Are Made Most of the annual streamflow in the Western United States originates as snowfall that has accumulated high in the mountains during winter and early spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources
    7. NATURAL RESOURCES 7.1 Executive Summary – Key Findings Precipitation, elevation, and topography are varied across the county. The diversity of soils, vegetation, and wildlife distribution vary with these factors. Western areas of the county are more fire prone due to steeper slopes and heavier fuels. The higher elevations in the western tip of the county provides key habitat for a variety of important species including elk, moose, bighorn sheep, mountain goats, and the two species in the county listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, grizzly bear and lynx. Wolves have been listed and de-listed over the course of the past year and status will be in flux with pending litigation and possible congressional legislation. Grizzly bear numbers have been increasing with a resulting increase in corresponding sightings and expansion of range to the east. In general, streams in the county that have been surveyed for impairment support the entire range of uses. Probable sources for waters in the county that do not fully support uses relate to either flow alterations from diversions or agricultural uses, or both. Flood plains have not been designated or mapped in the county. Air quality in the county is presumed to be good. All of the 17 water discharge permits in the county have expired, including the municipal waste water discharge permits. An area of the Rocky Mountain Front has been determined by the Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places to be an eligible Traditional Cultural District. The Forest Service in consultation with the Blackfeet Tribe will give consideration to this situation in decision making related to all proposed uses (recreation, oil and gas development, and others) on the National Forest lands within this district.
    [Show full text]