A Common Cause for Phelan-Mcdermid Syndrome and Neurofibromatosis Type 2: One Ring to Bind Them Ariel M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
RESIDENT & FELLOW SECTION Clinical Reasoning: Section Editor A common cause for Phelan-McDermid John J. Millichap, MD syndrome and neurofibromatosis type 2 One ring to bind them Ariel M. Lyons-Warren, SECTION 1 her mother reported loss of previously mastered MD, PhD An 8-year-old girl with mild dysmorphic features pre- vocabulary and struggles with fine motor skills such Sau Wai Cheung, PhD sented for evaluation of developmental delay and star- as buttoning. She also noted repetitive movements, J. Lloyd Holder Jr., MD, ing spells. She had been born late preterm and spent 1 obsessive behaviors, and hand flapping. PhD month in the neonatal intensive care unit. She was Question for consideration: generally healthy other than her developmental delay, which improved somewhat with physical, occupa- 1. What is the initial evaluation for a child with Correspondence to tional, and speech therapy. At the first clinic visit, developmental delay? Dr. Holder: [email protected] GO TO SECTION 2 From Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article. © 2017 American Academy of Neurology e205 ª 2017 American Academy of Neurology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. SECTION 2 it increases to 5% in specific populations with other A total of 1%–3% of children younger than 5 are key clinical features. Therefore, routine screening is diagnosed with global developmental delay. The dif- not recommended.1 ferential diagnosis is broad and includes genetic, Our patient’s initial evaluation included an MRI structural, and metabolic causes.1 Initial evaluation brain that was unremarkable and a karyotype that should include neuroimaging, with MRI being pref- revealed a ring chromosome 22 including a terminal erable to CT. MRI brain will identify an abnormality deletion of the long arm. A ring chromosome is such as a malformation, atrophy, white matter dis- when the p and q arms of the chromosome fuse ease, demyelination, or injury in 48%–92% of chil- together and often occurs due to deletion of one dren with developmental delay.1 Evaluation should arm. Subsequent high-resolution karyotype with also include genetic testing such as karyotype, array subtelomeric fluorescent in situ hybridization anal- comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), gene- ysis confirmed the diagnosis (figure, A) and demon- specific testing, and whole exome sequencing strated a double-sized ring chromosome 22 in 15% (WES).2 aCGH is now often considered the first- of cells. In order to better define the size of the line genetic test because it will identify an etiology in deletion, a high-resolution aCGH was performed, up to 20% of individuals with developmental delay which identified a 1.036-Mb deletion in the subte- through detection of genomic deletions and dupli- lomeric region of the long arm of chromosome 22 cations. In contrast, the diagnostic yield for karyo- involving 20 genes including SHANK3, consistent type is less than 10%. Therefore, while karyotype with the diagnosis of Phelan-McDermid syndrome will identify chromosomal abnormalities such as (PMS) (figure, B and C). To complete the evalua- Down syndrome, Turner syndrome, or large geno- tion, the patient was assessed with an Autism mic deletions, it is now frequently omitted in the Diagnostic Observation Schedule and met criteria evaluation of the developmentally delayed child. for autism. Single gene, gene panel, or WES is subsequently After receiving the diagnosis, the patient was lost ordered if clinically indicated. WES is ordered to to follow-up for several years. At age 16, the family evaluate for de novo mutations in previously identi- noted a change in the patient’s personality. She pre- fied developmental genes when there are no clinical viously related well with other children and was features pointing towards a specific syndrome. Nota- described as sweet and kind. Her parents expressed bly, some complex genomic abnormalities such as concern for new episodes of unprovoked anger. Her ring chromosomes are not detected by aCGH, gene family also noted the development of painless growths testing, or WES. Therefore, children with terminal on both arms, most predominant on the left arm and chromosome deletions should be evaluated for a ring wrist. chromosome by karyotype. Questions for consideration: EEG is not indicated for routine evaluation of developmental delay unless the child exhibits regres- 1. What is the evaluation for behavioral regression in sion or seizures.2 a child with developmental delay? Routine screening for metabolic causes of global 2. How do the growths on the patient’s arm relate to developmental delay has a yield of only 1%, although her other signs and symptoms? GO TO SECTION 3 e206 Neurology 89 October 24, 2017 ª 2017 American Academy of Neurology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Figure Genetic and neuroimaging evaluation (A) Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis depicts a normal chromosome 22 with Cosmid probe n85a3 of the SHANK3 gene in red and the control probe in green, and a ring chromosome with only green signal indicating the deletion of the SHANK3 gene at band 22q13.3 (red arrow). (B) High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization shows all the oligo probes for chromosome 22 with a copy number loss of chromosome band 22q13.3 of 1.036 Mb (depicted as red circles). (C) Chromosome 22 ideogram shows the relative locations of SHANK3 and NF2. (D) Axial T1 postcontrast MRI brain. Red arrow points to bulky lobular, enhancing mass extending from the right cerebellopontine angle to the right internal auditory canal, consistent with a schwannoma. (E) Axial T1 postcontrast MRI spine with right lumbar paraspinal enhancing focus just medial to the right psoas muscle concerning for a small schwannoma. Neurology 89 October 24, 2017 e207 ª 2017 American Academy of Neurology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. SECTION 3 as more than one-quarter of children will have renal In a child with developmental delay, frustration abnormalities ranging from reflux to absent kidneys. related to communication difficulties from impaired Individuals with PMS may also have developmental hearing or speech delay can manifest as aggression. structural brain abnormalities, including delayed New-onset seizure activity can also manifest as behav- myelination, thin corpus callosum, and arachnoid ior changes such as postictal agitation or irritability cysts. Finally, children with PMS can have sleep related to poor sleep following nocturnal seizures. abnormalities, including bedtime resistance, delayed Therefore, MRI brain, EEG, and audiology testing onset, sleep anxiety, parasomnias, sleep-disordered were ordered for this patient. breathing, and daytime sleepiness.3,4 Brain MRI revealed a large, enhancing right cere- Patients with PMS can have variable phenotype bellopontine angle to internal auditory canal vestibu- possibly related to size of their deletion on the long lar schwannoma (figure, D) and a punctate arm of chromosome 22.5 The majority of neurologic contralateral vestibular schwannoma that were not features, however, are believed to be due to haploin- present on the prior brain MRI brain at 8 years of sufficiency of the SHANK3 gene.6 The SHANK3 age. Based on these findings, MRI spine was also protein is enriched in the postsynaptic density of ordered and identified enhancing foci in multiple excitatory synapses. Along with other members of paraspinal areas, which were concerning for schwan- the SHANK protein family, SHANK3 is believed nomas (figure, E). EEG revealed a focus of sharp to play an important role in synaptogenesis, synapse transients over the left temporal region suggestive of maintenance, and synapse plasticity.6 an epileptogenic focus. The patient subsequently had NF2 is diagnosed using the Manchester criteria7: an event concerning for seizure in which she was • Bilateral vestibular schwannomas or staring and nonresponsive and then fell to the • Unilateral vestibular schwannoma and at least 2 ground. Audiology testing was not able to establish other features including meningioma, glioma, hearing sensitivity due to the patient’s inability to schwannoma, or juvenile posterior lenticular complete the task. However, crossed acoustic reflexes opacities were absent, suggesting impairment of the auditory nerve. The hallmark feature is bilateral vestibular Given the presence of bilateral vestibular as well as schwannomas. However, additional criteria allow spinal schwannomas, the growths on her arms were for the diagnosis in a patient with at least 2 meningi- likely peripheral schwannomas. The patient was omas and unilateral vestibular schwannoma or at least referred to oncology for further evaluation. She was 2 meningiomas and 2 of the other features including determined to meet criteria for neurofibromatosis glioma, neurofibroma, schwannoma, and cataract.7 type 2 (NF2). Comprehensive auditory evaluation Although schwannomas are benign, they can cause was difficult to obtain secondary to the patient’s intel- symptoms ranging from hearing loss to brainstem lectual disability. She was evaluated by neurosurgery, compression and are therefore usually monitored with who did not recommend surgical intervention as serial imaging.8 These symptoms are caused by dis- hearing was intact to voice. She was treated with ruption of the NF2 gene on chromosome 22 (figure, bevacizumab with significant