DATA QUADRANT REPORT Application Lifecycle Management 484 11 Reviews Vendors Evaluated Application Lifecycle Management Data Quadrant Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DATA QUADRANT REPORT Application Lifecycle Management 484 11 Reviews Vendors Evaluated Application Lifecycle Management Data Quadrant Report August 2020 DATA QUADRANT REPORT Application Lifecycle Management 484 11 Reviews Vendors Evaluated Application Lifecycle Management Data Quadrant Report How to Use the Report Table of Info-Tech’s Data Quadrant Reports provide a comprehensive evaluation of popular products in the Application Lifecycle Management market. This buyer’s guide is designed to help prospective Contents purchasers make better decisions by leveraging the experiences of real users. The data in this report is collected from real end users, meticulously verified for erv acity, Data Quadrant.................................................................................................................. 4 exhaustively analyzed, and visualized in easy to understand charts and graphs. Each product is compared and contrasted with all other vendors in their category to create a holistic, unbiased view Category Overview ......................................................................................................5 of the product landscape. Use this report to determine which product is right for your organization. For highly detailed reports Vendor Capability Summary................................................................................ 6 on individual products, see Info-Tech’s Product Scorecard. Vendor Capabilities...................................................................................................... 9 Product Feature Summary.................................................................................. 21 Product Features........................................................................................................25 2 Data Quadrant Report Software Application Lifecycle Management Software Directory Akana Lifecycle Manager for APIs ALM Octane ALM Works for Jira APPLICATION LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE Selecting software can be overwhelming and one of the biggest challenges facing Azure DevOps Core ALM Enalean Tuleap organizations is understanding the marketplace and identifying all of the available vendors and products. The Software Directory is a comprehensive list of all relevant software IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle vendors in a particular category. Use this page Genuitec Pulse Private Label Helix ALM Suite to create the right vendor shortlist by exploring Management (CLM) all of the options available to your organization. Inflectra SpiraTeam Integrity Intland codeBeamer ALM iRise ALM Jama Jira Kovair ALM Studio Modern Requirements NICE Workforce Management Oracle PeopleTools Application Lifecycle Management Orcanos ALM Parasoft Development Testing Platform Polarion ALM Rally Software Rocket Aldon ALM Software SmarteSoft SmarteQM Storyteller TeamForge TechExcel DevSuite TopTeam Analyst TrackPlus VersionOne VisionFlow Visure 3 Application Lifecycle Management Data Quadrant Report SOFTWARE REVIEWS Assess vendor and product performance at a glance and use the Software Reviews Data Quadrant to identify which products and vendors are leadings the pack and Data Quadrant which are trailing. APPLICATION LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT AUGUST 2020 8.8 PRODUCT LEADER INNOVATOR APPLICATION LIFECYCLE Azure DevOps Inflectra SpiraTeam MANAGEMENT The Software Reviews Data Quadrant evaluates and ranks products based on feedback from IT and business professionals. The placement of a software in the Data Quadrant indicates its relative ranking as well as its categorization. IBM Rational CLM Jira The Complete Software Experience ALM Works for Jira When distilled down, the software experience is shaped by both the experience with the software and the relationship with Helix ALM Suite Visure the vendor. Evaluating enterprise software along these two dimensions provides a comprehensive understanding of the product and helps identify vendors that can deliver on both. VersionOne Product Features and Vendor Experience and ALM Octane Satisfaction Capabilities Rally Software The satisfaction is captured in the overall satisfaction The vendor relationship is calculated in a weighted average of the PRODUCT FEATURES AND SATISFACTION PRODUCT FEATURES score, which is driven by the likelihood of users to satisfaction scores tied to vendor capabilities (e.g. software recommend the software, combined with user implementation, training, customer support, product roadmap) as satisfaction across top product features. well as emotional response ratings toward the vendor (e.g. trustworthy, respectful, fair). Intland codeBeamer ALM SERVICE Note: The axes ranges are dynamically adjusted based on minimum and maximum values in the dataset. CHALLENGER STAR 6.8 Y 7.0 8.8 X VENDOR EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES 4 Application Lifecycle Management Data Quadrant Report This page provides a high level summary of product performance within the Application Lifecycle Management category. Products are ranked by a composite satisfaction score (Composite Score) that averages four different areas of evaluation: Net Emotional Footprint, Vendor Capabilities, Product Features, and Likeliness to Recommend. The Net Emotional Footprint Score measures user emotional response ratings of the vendor (e.g. trustworthy, respectful, fair). Category Overview Use this data to get a sense of the field, and to see how the products you’re considering stack up. NET EMOTIONAL NET EMOTIONAL VENDOR PRODUCT LIKELINESS TO NUMBER OF RANK VENDOR COMPOSITE SCORE FOOTPRINT FOOTPRINT DISTRIBUTION CAPABILITIES FEATURES RECOMMEND REVIEWS Inflectra SpiraTeam 8.4/10 +91 79% 80% 87% 33 1% NEGATIVE 92% POSITIVE ALM Works for Jira 8.2/10 +90 79% 81% 80% 32 1% NEGATIVE 92% POSITIVE Azure DevOps 8.2/10 +81 80% 81% 86% 106 4% NEGATIVE 85% POSITIVE 4 IBM Rational CLM 8.1/10 +85 79% 78% 84% 37 4% NEGATIVE 88% POSITIVE 5 Visure 8.1/10 +84 79% 79% 81% 47 3% NEGATIVE 88% POSITIVE 6 Jira 8.0/10 +79 77% 79% 85% 119 5% NEGATIVE 84% POSITIVE 7 VersionOne 7.8/10 +86 72% 75% 80% 16 4% NEGATIVE 90% POSITIVE 8 Helix ALM Suite 7.7/10 +75 75% 80% 79% 29 5% NEGATIVE 78% POSITIVE 9 Intland codeBeamer ALM 7.7/10 +91 76% 75% 67% 18 1% NEGATIVE 92% POSITIVE 10 Rally Software 7.7/10 +84 76% 78% 71% 12 2% NEGATIVE 85% POSITIVE AVERAGE SCORES 7.9/10 +83 77% 78% 79% 43 4% NEGATIVE 87% POSITIVE 5 Application Lifecycle Management Data Quadrant Report This page provides a high level summary of product performance within the Application Lifecycle Management category. Products are ranked by a composite satisfaction score (Composite Score) that averages four different areas of evaluation: Net Emotional Footprint, Vendor Capabilities, Product Features, and Likeliness to Recommend. The Net Emotional Footprint Score measures user emotional response ratings of the vendor (e.g. trustworthy, respectful, fair). Category Overview Use this data to get a sense of the field, and ot see how the products you’re considering stack up. RANK VENDOR COMPOSITE SCORE NET EMOTIONAL NET EMOTIONAL VENDOR PRODUCT LIKELINESS TO NUMBER OF FOOTPRINT FOOTPRINT DISTRIBUTION CAPABILITIES FEATURES RECOMMEND REVIEWS 11 ALM Octane 7.4/10 +70 75% 79% 72% 21 10% NEGATIVE 80% POSITIVE AVERAGE SCORES 7.9/10 +83 77% 78% 79% 43 4% NEGATIVE 87% POSITIVE VENDORS WITH INSUFFICIENT DATA -- Storyteller 7.9/10 +76 79% 74% 84% 8 5% NEGATIVE 84% POSITIVE -- TechExcel DevSuite 8.5/10 +87 83% 88% 83% 6 1% NEGATIVE 90% POSITIVE 6 Application Lifecycle Management Data Quadrant Report This page summarizes user satisfaction with a variety of vendor capabilities regarding their product offering(s). Look for strong and consistent performance across the Vendor Capability Summary board when assembling your shortlist, and follow-up on areas of concern during the evaluation and negotiation processes. PRODUCT OVERALL BUSINESS VALUE BREADTH OF QUALITY OF STRATEGY AND USABILITY AND VENDOR EASE OF DATA EASE OF IT EASE OF AVAILABILITY EASE OF VENDOR CAPABILITY CREATED FEATURES FEATURES RATE OF INTUITIVENESS SUPPORT INTEGRATION ADMINISTRATION CUSTOMIZATION AND QUALITY OF IMPLEMENTATION SATISFACTION IMPROVEMENT TRAINING Azure DevOps 80% 83% 81% 82% 80% 78% 78% 80% 81% 78% 80% 84% IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management (CLM) 79% 81% 79% 81% 78% 77% 81% 80% 78% 78% 80% 76% Inflectra SpiraTeam 79% 79% 79% 79% 78% 79% 84% 77% 77% 79% 77% 80% Visure 79% 76% 79% 79% 77% 79% 85% 79% 75% 79% 81% 78% ALM Works for Jira 79% 79% 80% 79% 77% 79% 80% 79% 75% 81% 79% 82% Jira 77% 79% 78% 79% 75% 76% 75% 77% 78% 79% 72% 80% Rally Software 76% 75% 73% 78% 84% 71% 70% 76% 84% 77% 69% 79% Intland codeBeamer ALM 76% 72% 76% 74% 72% 76% 83% 74% 72% 74% 79% 82% Helix ALM Suite 75% 73% 67% 76% 70% 75% 87% 72% 84% 76% 71% 78% ALM Octane 75% 72% 76% 79% 76% 76% 67% 79% 73% 71% 76% 77% CATEGORY AVERAGE 77% 77% 76% 79% 76% 76% 79% 76% 78% 77% 76% 79% 7 Application Lifecycle Management Data Quadrant Report This page summarizes user satisfaction with a variety of vendor capabilities regarding their product offering(s). Look for strong and consistent performance across the Vendor Capability Summary board when assembling your shortlist, and follow-up on areas of concern during the evaluation and negotiation processes. PRODUCT OVERALL BUSINESS VALUE BREADTH OF QUALITY OF STRATEGY AND USABILITY AND VENDOR EASE OF DATA EASE OF IT EASE OF AVAILABILITY EASE OF VENDOR CAPABILITY CREATED FEATURES FEATURES RATE OF INTUITIVENESS SUPPORT INTEGRATION ADMINISTRATION CUSTOMIZATION AND QUALITY OF IMPLEMENTATION SATISFACTION IMPROVEMENT TRAINING VersionOne 72% 74% 73% 77% 68% 71% 75% 68% 74% 70% 71% 75% CATEGORY AVERAGE 77% 77% 76% 79% 76% 76% 79% 76% 78% 77% 76% 79% VENDORS WITH INSUFFICIENT DATA TechExcel DevSuite 83% 83% 83% 83% 83%
Recommended publications
  • Defect Tracking System Project Documentation
    Defect Tracking System Project Documentation Tottering Barr azotise some Faust and gyps his surplices so sweetly! Northrup remains impellent after Sigfried havers nominally or fluorescing any good-byes. Remus orientalize thunderously? So much like automation and project defect tracking documentation but not win any kind of the organization tries to track the list by the beginning development team and let an. The amount of tracking system project defect tracking system! All comments are moderated before publication and desire meet our guidelines. Testing is a lousy part of mature software life cycle, and recent trends in software engineering evidence the importance all this activity all survey the development process. Diving deeper into program language theory is a great way data grow outside a developer. Your comment has been received. Bug reporting by the Web and email. Her homeland of interests are Wireless Networks and Database Management Systems. As projects grow in size and complexity, the limits of an Excel story for tracking issues begin to show which quickly. Thank who for using our services. Ten reports engine is a few lines of system project defect tracking documentation appears every single pane contains the. Defect tracking is responsible system authority is applied for any system software so run system performs well. User interface and learning curve the system user interfaces are more user friendly than others. Switch to fullscreen mode always show business bug attributes at once. Some custom structure for large body usually, evaluating and tracking system project defect documentation related documents, planning with your development organization efficiently and eliminate bad.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Lifecycle Management Tools Open Source
    Application Lifecycle Management Tools Open Source Posh and tropistic Christofer congees almost despondingly, though Sam humiliating his breastworks recoins. Jorge usually assassinates astringently or disrupt crustily when interterritorial Marko voids streakily and convivially. Irresponsible Vijay unround broadly. With the software changes into three core business reason for anyone using powerful lifecycle tools across public activity management The package includes OSS project management tool Redmine and version. This year open source ALM tuleap httpwwwenaleancomentuleap is altogether good start. ALM tools automate the software development and deployment processes help. Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management ALM software and solutions. Virtual flavor of the product with its embedded and application software before. Greg Lindhorst Principal Program Manager Thursday January 14 2021. The more List and Open-source Tools View ahead complete list ANT Anypoint Platform. Application Lifecycle Management Tools ALM is the continuous process of. Top 10 Application Lifecycle Management Tools For end Year. A degree to two the limitations of save open-source circuit otherwise inadequate tool. Best Free Application Lifecycle Management Software 2021. Each document type main source code is managed with SubversionSVN with. It is free of tools are the advent of the use after year after going through it connects people meet business outcomes as and open application source tools? Application Lifecycle Management SoftLanding. Top Application Lifecycle Management ALM Toolsets InfoQ. They also have original single proponent of truth providing any relevant. Then view the software projects, open application lifecycle management tools on open source option, and hybrid it can create and. Software lifecycle management SLM is the discipline for managing.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Management Software March 2019
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE MARCH 2019 Powered by Methodology CONTENTS 3 Introduction 5 Defining Project Management Software 6 FrontRunners (Small Vendors) 8 FrontRunners (Enterprise Vendors) 10 Runners Up 22 Methodology Basics 2 INTRODUCTION his FrontRunners analysis minimum qualifying score of 3.96 Tis a data-driven assessment for Usability and 3.91 for User identifying products in the Project Recommended, while the Small Management software market that Vendor graphic had a minimum offer the best capability and value qualifying score of 4.55 for Usability for small businesses. For a given and 4.38 for User Recommended. market, products are evaluated and given a score for Usability (x-axis) To be considered for the Project and User Recommended (y-axis). Management FrontRunners, a FrontRunners then plots 10-15 product needed a minimum of 20 products each on a Small Vendor user reviews published within 18 and an Enterprise Vendor graphic, months of the evaluation period. based on vendor business size, per Products needed a minimum user category. rating score of 3.0 for both Usability and User Recommended in both In the Project Management the Small and Enterprise graphics. FrontRunners infographic, the Enterprise Vendor graphic had a 3 INTRODUCTION The minimum score cutoff to be included in the FrontRunners graphic varies by category, depending on the range of scores in each category. No product with a score less than 3.0 in either dimension is included in any FrontRunners graphic. For products included, the Usability and User Recommended scores determine their positions on the FrontRunners graphic. 4 DEFINING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE roject management software and document management, as well Phelps organizations manage as at least one of the following: time and deliver projects on time, on tracking, budgeting, and resource budget and within scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting an Application Lifecycle Management and Devops Solution, 2019–20
    Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting an Application Lifecycle Management and DevOps Solution, 2019–20 Publication Date: 27 Jun 2019 | Product code: INT003-000374 Michael Azoff Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting an Application Lifecycle Management and DevOps Solution, 2019–20 Summary Catalyst Software lifecycle management (SLM) is the management of software development by taking a lifecycle approach from concept through the management of requirements, testing, coding, deployment, upgrades, maintenance, and final retirement. The market provides tools to support this lifecycle in the form of application lifecycle management (ALM) tools and, with the rise of DevOps, tools that provide DevOps-style release management, orchestration, and automation. This Ovum Decision Matrix (ODM) examines ALM tools that cross over into DevOps to support the full arc of the lifecycle from application/product concept to deployment into production. Ovum view ALM origins and trends The need for taking an SLM approach is best thought of as good practice in the relatively young art of software development. The ALM tools market has evolved to support SLM through the years; at its core is the development methodology or work process, and this has evolved over time, starting with waterfall or linear stage-gate processes and incorporating various innovations such as Tom Gilb's evolutionary delivery, Barry Boehm's spiral model, and Rational's unified process, before Agile and lean swept the board with examples such as Scrum, extreme programming, and Kanban boards post- 2001 (when the Agile Manifesto was created). The integrated ALM suite tools market really took off around 2003 but supported waterfall because Agile was still under the radar.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Versions Added in ARL #2547 Publisher Product Version
    List of Versions Added in ARL #2547 Publisher Product Version 2BrightSparks SyncBackLite 8.5 2BrightSparks SyncBackLite 8.6 2BrightSparks SyncBackLite 8.8 2BrightSparks SyncBackLite 8.9 2BrightSparks SyncBackPro 5.9 3Dconnexion 3DxWare 1.2 3Dconnexion 3DxWare Unspecified 3S-Smart Software Solutions CODESYS 3.4 3S-Smart Software Solutions CODESYS 3.5 3S-Smart Software Solutions CODESYS Automation Platform Unspecified 4Clicks Solutions License Service 2.6 4Clicks Solutions License Service Unspecified Acarda Sales Technologies VoxPlayer 1.2 Acro Software CutePDF Writer 4.0 Actian PSQL Client 8.0 Actian PSQL Client 8.1 Acuity Brands Lighting Version Analyzer Unspecified Acuity Brands Lighting Visual Lighting 2.0 Acuity Brands Lighting Visual Lighting Unspecified Adobe Creative Cloud Suite 2020 Adobe JetForm Unspecified Alastri Software Rapid Reserver 1.4 ALDYN Software SvCom Unspecified Alexey Kopytov sysbench 1.0 Alliance for Sustainable Energy OpenStudio 1.11 Alliance for Sustainable Energy OpenStudio 1.12 Alliance for Sustainable Energy OpenStudio 1.5 Alliance for Sustainable Energy OpenStudio 1.9 Alliance for Sustainable Energy OpenStudio 2.8 alta4 AG Voyager 1.2 alta4 AG Voyager 1.3 alta4 AG Voyager 1.4 ALTER WAY WampServer 3.2 Alteryx Alteryx Connect 2019.4 Alteryx Alteryx Platform 2019.2 Alteryx Alteryx Server 10.5 Alteryx Alteryx Server 2019.3 Amazon AWS Command Line Interface 1 Amazon AWS Command Line Interface 2 Amazon AWS SDK for Java 1.11 Amazon CloudWatch Agent 1.20 Amazon CloudWatch Agent 1.21 Amazon CloudWatch Agent 1.23 Amazon
    [Show full text]
  • Implement Devops Through Existing Tools Integration
    Kovair Intelligent DevOps Implement DevOps through Existing Tools Integration Achieve Process Unity in Diversity Develop Build Deploy Test Release Continuous Integration Coding and Check-in for Automated Build Functional Testing, UAT and Test Automation Requirements/ Continuous Planning Continuous Testing ALM CRs/Defects Memory, Support Bi-directional Application Performance, Tickets Integrations DB Usage Monitoring Customer Analyst Continuous Feedback Continuous Monitoring Continuous Status Update on fixes and CRs Continuous Delivery Continuous Operations Operations Reports, Dashboard and Release Pipeline Tracking Traceability Figure: Intelligent DevOps Workflow Diagram PRODUCT HIGHTLIGHTS ü One-click DevOps execution tool for automating requirements planning to production deployments ü Seamless integration of data and execution flow without replacing current tools ü Intelligent reporting and prioritization of processes and development issues ü Stay updated with real-time metrics and traceability based on cross tool data ü Supports 7C’s of DevOps ü Capable of integrating with all existing tools protecting your existing investment ü Support for Open API to push all data to Data Lake for analytics Why Integrate Tools for DevOps? The need for faster time-to-market and frequent product updates led to a paradigm shift from traditional SDLC / ALM processes to Agile methodologies. Further, in order to speed up the delivery pipelines, teams adopted Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery processes. This required the operations team to engage early in the development and testing cycles for faster provisioning, deployment, and incorporating customer feedbacks faster — paving the way for DevOps. With DevOps, a host of new automation tools was introduced for automating build, unit test, code quality analysis, staging, release, deployment, provisioning, configuring, and performance monitoring steps.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Applications Updated in ARL #2573
    List of Applications Updated in ARL #2573 Application Name Publisher BIOS to UEFI 1.4 1E SyncBackPro 9.3 2BrightSparks M*Modal Fluency Direct Connector 3M M*Modal Fluency Direct Connector 7.85 3M M*Modal Fluency Direct 3M M*Modal Fluency Flex 3M Fluency for Imaging 3M M*Modal Fluency for Transcription Editor 7.6 3M M*Modal Fluency Direct Connector 10.0 3M M*Modal Fluency Direct CAPD 3M M*Modal Fluency for Transcription Editor 3M Studio 3T 2020.5 3T Software Labs Studio 3T 2020.7 3T Software Labs Studio 3T 2020.2 3T Software Labs Studio 3T 2020.8 3T Software Labs Studio 3T 2020.3 3T Software Labs MailRaider 3.69 Pro 45RPM software MailRaider 3.67 Pro 45RPM software Text Toolkit for Microsoft Excel 4Bits ASAP Utilities 7.7 A Must in Every Office Graphical Development Environment 3.2 Ab Initio PrizmDoc Server 13.8 AccuSoft ImageGear for .NET 24.11 AccuSoft PrizmDoc Client 13.8 AccuSoft PrizmDoc Client 13.9 AccuSoft ImagXpress 13.5 AccuSoft Universal Restore Bootable Media Builder 11.5 Acronis True Image 2020 Acronis ActivePerl 5.12 ActiveState Komodo Edit 12.0 ActiveState ActivePerl 5.26 Enterprise ActiveState TransMac 12.6 Acute Systems CrossFont 6.5 Acute Systems CrossFont 6.6 Acute Systems CrossFont 6.2 Acute Systems CrossFont 5.5 Acute Systems CrossFont 5.6 Acute Systems CrossFont 6.3 Acute Systems CrossFont 5.7 Acute Systems CrossFont 6.0 Acute Systems Split Table Wizard for Microsoft Excel 2.3 Add-in Express Template Phrases for Microsoft Outlook 4.7 Add-in Express Merge Tables Wizard for Microsoft Excel 2018 Add-in Express Advanced
    [Show full text]
  • Totalview Training DECEMBER 2020
    TotalView Training DECEMBER 2020 TotalViewTotalViewby Perforce©by Perforce 2019 © Perforce Perforce Software, Software, Inc. Inc. LBL/NERSC Agenda • Introduction (Bill) • Q&A • Overview of TotalView Labs (Bill/Dean) • Break • TotalView Features (Bill) • Python Debugging (Dean) • TotalView’s New UI (Dean) • Replay Engine (Dean) • Remote Debugging – Remote Display Client (Dean) • OpenMP debugging (Bill) • Remote Debugging – Remote UI with Reverse Connect • MPI Debugging (Bill) Feature (Bill) • MemoryScape (Dean or Bill) • Startup (Dean) • CUDA debugging (Bill) • UI Navigation and Process Control (Dean) • TotalView Roadmap (Bill) • Action Points (Dean) • Common TotalView usage hints • Examining and Editing Data (Dean) • Q&A • Advanced C++ and Data Debugging (Dean) • TotalView Labs Help 2 | TotalView by Perforce © Perforce Software, Inc. totalview.io Introduction Perforce Global Footprint • Customers in 80 countries. • ~9,000 customers worldwide. • More than 250 of the Fortune 500. • Customers deploying multiple products. • 25+ offices and 4 data centers which give us global reach. • Over 900 employees in 25 countries. 5 | TotalView by Perforce © Perforce Software, Inc. totalview.io Perforce Product Portfolio Agile Code Management Application Mgmt. Automated Management & Collaboration & Components Testing Helix ALM Helix Core Akana Helix QAC Hansoft Helix4Git OpenLogic Perfecto Gliffy JRebel Zend Klocwork TotalView Visualization SourcePro IMSL 6 | TotalView by Perforce © Perforce Software, Inc. totalview.io Overview of TotalView Labs Overview of TotalView Labs Nine different labs and accompanying example programs Notes • Lab 1 - Debugger Basics: Startup, Basic Process Control, • Labs 5 and 6 require use of TotalView’s Classic UI and Navigation • Sample program breakpoint files were created with • Lab 2 - Viewing, Examining, Watching, and Editing Data GNU compilers. If a different compiler is used, they • Lab 3 - Examining and Controlling a Parallel Application may not load and will need to be recreated.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting More out of JIRA
    EXPANDING JIRA WITH HELIX ALM Getting More Out of JIRA Atlassian’s JIRA was great for issue tracking when you were starting out, but now you may need more functionality than JIRA alone can deliver. How can you protect your JIRA investment and still gain the features you need? The answer is Helix ALM, with out-of-the-box JIRA integration. Integrated Bug Tracking, Test Management, and Requirements Management JIRA was designed and built for tracking defects. It focuses on tasks, issues, and defects, but there are no built-in test case management and requirements management features. You can buy add- ons from the JIRA marketplace, but they’re not supported by Atlassian. With Helix ALM, the entire development lifecycle is covered by one tightly integrated solution. Bug tracking, test case management, and requirements management are built into Helix ALM. As we develop new features, we consider each of these critical areas, ensuring everything works seamlessly without a drop in performance. Helix ALM even has a strong JIRA integration, allowing you to run tests in Helix ALM and log any failed tests directly in JIRA. You can also view the status of a JIRA item in Helix ALM. Why Should I Care? Helix ALM’s strong integration allows you to track every development artifact, not just bugs. In turn, this helps you expose the true cause of project delays, reduce problems with communication and hand-offs, eliminate duplicated effort, and establish a repeatable process for better compliance. © Copyright Perforce Software, Inc. All trademarks and registered www.perforce.com trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sector Releaseteam Is a Veteran-Owned, Full-Service Devops Consultancy
    DevOps Tool Specialists Experienced DevOps Solu�ons for The Public Sector ReleaseTEAM is a veteran-owned, full-service DevOps consultancy. Our focus is on helping our clients adapt and mature their so�ware “ReleaseTEAM is very responsive. development environments with solu�ons tailored Within minutes I have a response to their objec�ves and culture. We have been and within the week I get a serving so�ware development teams since 1999, we detailed answer for what I need. know legacy tools and best prac�ces, and we partner with the best modern tool vendors. It speaks volumes. They make my job easier.” We specialize in migra�ons and assessments but can bring extensive experience to all of your DevOps projects, including support, staff augmenta�on, Chris O’Brien coaching, and so�ware solu�ons. Our staff will work Business Systems Manager with you to understand your unique needs, audit Raytheon Technologies Corp. (RTX) your current development process, and recommend adop�on paths with the highest return. CONSULTING SUPPORT SOFTWARE TEAM BUILDING Our expert DevOps ReleaseTEAM provides We partner with ReleaseTEAM’s consultants understand expert support services industry-leading experienced that agility shouldn’t for all our partner technology providers to consultants work with compromise reliability. products, including ensure you get the your team un�l you can When you need to advice on best prac�ces efficiencies from the hunt down the right develop and release and 24-hour availability latest DevOps solu�ons. new hire. Meanwhile, code that ensures your for emergencies. Our As a service solu�on use ReleaseTEAM’s company retains the expert consultants partner, ReleaseTEAM experts to train your compe��ve edge, support modern and can assist you with tool trainers, or mentor your ReleaseTEAM will legacy applica�ons, and selec�on, management staff, to ensure your process are always available to implementa�on, ensure the complete addresses every resolve issues remotely, migra�on, support, transfer of skills into requirement and via email or phone, and licensing, or upgrades.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Test Cases from User Stories
    Sample Test Cases From User Stories Prefatory Jeffrey rechallenge fourth-class and tactfully, she dislodging her accompt obligates caudad. Clare remains neighbouring after Quigman unbudded second or luteinize any dodecahedrons. Returnable Pietro sometimes recommenced his transplantation antiphrastically and denazifying so untidily! Prerequisite the user should have a valid foreign credential. End-User Acceptance Testing Business Analysis Experts. Case Study at what Major US Bank Use-Case. Unsubscribe jira workflow, sample code defects as analysis techniques used when you will be done online visitor uses cases? User changes will start testing certifications, sample test cases from stories? Acceptance criteria definition purposes examplesformats and best practices. It team as both our primary guideline therefore the test case creation for the user story Acceptance Test Definition of Ready DoR DoR is the template. This can get from your requirement. Here instead a detailed example following a fairly typical 2-tier Kanban board for teams that. Another year of integrating the scenario storyboard and system navigation. Agile approach from quality of running these scenarios that team like product backlog items that value of business. That makes stories an ideal artifact to drive QA and acceptance testing. Too specific points are interconnected at iteration or a sample test cases. User Story Testing Ask your users what they can explain can't envision on your website. User Story Testing test IO. Three of cause most common techniques are the role-feature-reason template the Three C's. For example led many times have seen heard the statement 'we're not. Here to write user from emphasis on feedback, sample test case to work might like to ensure you get changes you soon, sample test cases from user stories, we allow for agile does.
    [Show full text]
  • SMH Test Plan
    Smart Mobility Hubs (SMH) Master Test Plan for the Smart Columbus Demonstration Program FINAL REPORT | October 11, 2019 Smart Columbus Produced by City of Columbus Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The U.S. Government is not endorsing any manufacturers, products, or services cited herein and any trade name that may appear in the work has been included only because it is essential to the contents of the work. Acknowledgment of Support This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Transportation under Agreement No. DTFH6116H00013. Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Acknowledgments The Smart Columbus Program would like to acknowledge the Smart Mobility Hubs project team which consisted of representatives from various agencies and stakeholders, for their support and valuable input. • Central Ohio Transit Authority • Ohio Department of Transportation • Columbus Metropolitan Library – Linden Branch • St. Stephen’s Community House • Columbus State Community College • Mobility Service Providers • Orange Barrel Media/IKE Smart City, LLC. • Franklin County Emergency Dispatch Center • Columbus Emergency Dispatch Center • Clinton Township Administration, Fire Chief’s Office, and Police Department Smart Mobility Hubs Master Test Plan – FINAL Report | Smart Columbus Program | i Abstract The purpose of this Smart Columbus Master Test Plan is to establish a common framework for conducting testing activities in support of the Smart Mobility Hubs project.
    [Show full text]