DOCSLIB.ORG

Clinging to Their Guns? the New Politics of Gun Carry in Everyday Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clinging to Their Guns? the New Politics of Gun Carry in Everyday Life Clinging to their Guns? The New Politics of Gun Carry in Everyday Life By Jennifer D. Carlson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Raka Ray, Chair Professor Ann Swidler Professor Loïc Wacquant Professor Jonathan Simon Professor Brian Delay Fall 2013 Abstract Clinging to their Guns? The New Politics of Gun Carry in Everyday Life by Jennifer D. Carlson Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Berkeley Professor Raka Ray, Chair Alongside a series of high-profile massacres over the past decade, Americans continue to turn to guns as the solution to, rather than the cause of, violent crime. Since the 1970s, most US states have significantly loosened restrictions on gun carrying for self-defense, and today, over 8 million Americans hold permits to carry guns concealed. Contrary to popular images of gun culture, this is not a white-only affair: in Michigan, whites and African Americans are licensed to carry guns at roughly the same rate. And while women are licensed at rates far lower than men, their numbers are increasing. This dissertation presents an in- depth analysis of the new politics of concealed carry and asks: Why do Americans not just own guns but also carry them? What role does the NRA play in enabling people to carry guns? And finally, how do different kinds of gun carriers enact the model of citizenship advocated by the NRA? Through intensive ethnographic fieldwork and interviews with gun carriers and pro-gun advocates in the Metro Detroit area, it shows how suspicion of the state’s power to police, combined with the embodied practice of gun carry, sustains a new politics of policing, crime and insecurity. Situating the appeal of guns in contexts of neoliberal decline facing Michigan, this book analyzes how, with the help of required NRA training, gun carry becomes an embodied, everyday practice through which gun carriers embrace a moral duty to protect not only oneself but also others (usually family, but sometimes strangers). I show how this moral duty is enacted differently by different groups of gun carriers: while all of the gun carriers I interviewed turned to guns to supplement what they viewed as inadequate police protection, gun carriers of color also mobilized gun rights as a way to defend against police abuse and assert their political rights, echoing the anti-statist position of groups such as the Black Panthers. Meanwhile, male gun carriers embraced their duty to protect self and others as a way to assert their social relevance as male protectors amid their declining status as breadwinners, while female gun carriers tended to emphasize their individual right to self-defense as an act of empowerment. Overall, this dissertation argues that for pro-gun Americans, the carrying of guns is a means of practicing good citizenship amid perceptions of social disorder. This understanding of American gun politics helps to clarify both why 1 Americans so vociferously 'cling to their guns' as practical and symbolical tools of policing, and it also sheds light on the NRA's hidden power as the primary organization that trains and certifies Americans to carry guns. 2 Table of Contents Introduction: Clinging to their guns? 1 Chapter 1: Criminal Insecurities 45 Chapter 2: Producing the Citizen-Protector: NRA Training and the Everyday Politics of Gun Carry 67 Chapter 3: From Protection to Policing: Embracing the Citizen-Protector 83 Chapter 4: The Citizen-Vigilante: Mistakes, Misunderstandings and Misuses of Guns 99 Chapter 5: Supplementing the Police: Enacting the Citizen-Protector 119 Chapter 6: Supplanting the Police: Radicalizing the Citizen-Protector 135 Chapter 7: The Softer Face of Gun Carry: Citizen-Protectors or Citizen-Defenders? 151 Conclusion: Fear of an Armed Nation 167 Bibliography 179 Appendix A: Population versus Concealed Pistol License Holders in Michigan 192 Appendix B: Interviewee Demographics 194 i Preface This book is about the complex ways in which guns come to figure as solutions to multiple insecurities (economic, social, physical) by making a statement about the failure of the state’s power to police – and how ideals of citizenship are remade in the process. It focuses on gun carriers in Michigan: As the most economically depressed state in the U.S., Michigan is the site of especially exacerbated socio-economic insecurities as compared to the rest of the country. This book aims to raise questions about how, as political objects, guns work to address (real and imagined) social, economic and physical insecurities, and it suggests that what lies at the heart of gun politics is a particular critique of the state’s power to police. Sometimes alarmingly exclusionary, sometimes surprisingly inclusive, gun politics stipulate new moral codes for how a person should behave amid a context perceived to be saturated with insecurity and aggravated by the state’s perceived failure to adequately police. To take seriously the politics of guns and embark in the sustained analysis that this book provides is fraught with political peril; with guns one of the most contentious social issues in the United States (the other is abortion), it is difficult to avoid a value judgment on whether guns represent good or evil. For those looking for a condemnatory analysis of the people who choose to carry guns, this dissertation will probably be a disappointment. That is not because this kind of analysis is not possible or even justified: there are already plenty of books already touting the myriad ways in which Americans have been duped by conservative elites. What this dissertation tries to do is something a little different: it tries to unpack the universe in which guns are a sensible, morally upstanding solution to the problem of crime, a universe in which the NRA is not a hardline lobby peddling myths of heroic masculinity but rather a community service organization, a universe in which guns are beneficial not only for white men but also for racial minorities and women. Make no mistake about it, gun violence is an epidemic in the US: gun deaths are on track to outpace motor vehicle deaths, and in 12 states plus DC, they already do (VPC, 2013a). A recent CDC (Leshner et al., 2013) report on firearms-related violence unpacks the disturbing statistics of the nation’s gun problem: in 2010, there were 31,672 gun deaths and 73,505 non-fatal gun injuries. Most gun deaths are suicides, followed by homicides (only 1% of firearms deaths are unintentional or accidental shootings). In 2010, 19,392 people ended their lives with a gun. Of the 12,664 homicides reported to the FBI in 2011, 8,583 were firearms-related, and of these, gun-involved homicides, 72% were carried out with handguns (this represents just less than 50% of total homicides). Of course, these numbers do not include people who are threatened, but not injured or killed, with guns. Importantly, gun casualties are not equally distributed: the CDC reports that economic conditions and geography shape who is affected by guns and how. White, rural, middle-aged men are most likely to commit suicide; youth of color living in conditions of urban poverty are most likely to be the victims of homicide. African American men are most likely to be killed by guns. These are compelling statistics: no one disagrees about that. The question that the gun debate turns on, is: what should they compel us to think or do? ii Gun policy represents one answer. Gun proponents, of course, maintain that people should have the right to defend themselves against gun violence with equal force: that is, with guns. Whether guns are effective tools of self-defense is widely contested (Kellermann’s reports suggest guns increase risks of homicide, suicide and armed robbery, while Gary Kleck and his colleagues have shown that people who use guns self-defensively have a greater chance of survival during criminal victimization); perhaps this is because their proficient use depends more on the skills, training and know-how of the user rather than the gun itself. As the CDC report notes, even though gun owners report greater feelings of safety, “additional research is needed to weigh the competing risks and protective benefits that may accompany gun ownership in different communities” (CDC, 2013: 41). But many Americans are not waiting for more research to make up their minds about guns: for millions of Americans, they’ve already decided that guns are a protective device against crime, a solution to the problem of violence. What this book does is try to unpack how guns come to be viewed as the solution, and what that means for contemporary notions of Americans citizenship. *** I want to acknowledge the many people who supported me in pursuing this controversial topic. I want to especially thank two groups of people: the people in the pro-gun world who opened their arms to me (even as a “Berkeley” sociologist) and the people in the sociology world who stood behind this project and believed in the importance of analyzing pro-gun America from the ground up. First, I want to thank the gun carriers, instructors, and activists who participated in this study. Whether you shared your time during interviews, your expertise during impromptu firearms training, or your generosity in introducing me to other “gunnies” and inviting me to picnics, potlucks and activist events: this study would not have been possible without you. Each of you deserves recognition in contributing to this study. Thank you. Next, I want to thank the sociologists who shaped this project. First, the two intellectual powerhouses who supported this project from the beginning: Raka Ray and Ann Swidler.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LEAPING TALL BUILDINGS American Comics SETH KUSHNER Pictures
    LEAPING TALL BUILDINGS LEAPING TALL BUILDINGS LEAPING TALL From the minds behind the acclaimed comics website Graphic NYC comes Leaping Tall Buildings, revealing the history of American comics through the stories of comics’ most important and influential creators—and tracing the medium’s journey all the way from its beginnings as junk culture for kids to its current status as legitimate literature and pop culture. Using interview-based essays, stunning portrait photography, and original art through various stages of development, this book delivers an in-depth, personal, behind-the-scenes account of the history of the American comic book. Subjects include: WILL EISNER (The Spirit, A Contract with God) STAN LEE (Marvel Comics) JULES FEIFFER (The Village Voice) Art SPIEGELMAN (Maus, In the Shadow of No Towers) American Comics Origins of The American Comics Origins of The JIM LEE (DC Comics Co-Publisher, Justice League) GRANT MORRISON (Supergods, All-Star Superman) NEIL GAIMAN (American Gods, Sandman) CHRIS WARE SETH KUSHNER IRVING CHRISTOPHER SETH KUSHNER IRVING CHRISTOPHER (Jimmy Corrigan, Acme Novelty Library) PAUL POPE (Batman: Year 100, Battling Boy) And many more, from the earliest cartoonists pictures pictures to the latest graphic novelists! words words This PDF is NOT the entire book LEAPING TALL BUILDINGS: The Origins of American Comics Photographs by Seth Kushner Text and interviews by Christopher Irving Published by To be released: May 2012 This PDF of Leaping Tall Buildings is only a preview and an uncorrected proof . Lifting
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia American
    Case 1:18-cv-02388 Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, 555 New Jersey Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20001 GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, Case No. 268 Bush Street #555, San Francisco, CA 94104 SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, AL 36104 Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20202 Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 1. Plaintiffs American Federation of Teachers, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, and Southern Poverty Law Center bring this action against Defendant U.S. Department of Education (“Department”) to compel compliance with the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”). 2. Education Secretary Elisabeth DeVos recently gave the green light to states and local school districts to use federal grant funds from the Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program to purchase firearms and firearms training for teachers and other school staff—an unlawful use of these funds. Case 1:18-cv-02388 Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 2 of 8 3. The information sought by Plaintiffs’ FOIA requests, which will shed light on whether lobbyists associated with the firearms industry or gun-lobby groups including the National Rifle Association were involved in the Department’s decision and reveal communications between the Department and states or local school districts and within the Department concerning the use of these funds to arm teachers, is plainly of great public importance. 4. Yet, despite the pressing need for this information, Defendant has failed to comply with its statutory obligations to respond within the legally required time period.
    [Show full text]
  • C00490045 Restore Our Future, Inc. $4116274
    Independent Expenditure Table 2 Committees/Persons Reporting Independent Expenditures from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 ID # Committee/Individual Amount C00490045 RESTORE OUR FUTURE, INC. $4,116,274 C00499731 MAKE US GREAT AGAIN, INC $3,793,524 C00501098 OUR DESTINY PAC $2,323,481 C00000935 DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $1,759,111 C00495028 HOUSE MAJORITY PAC $1,073,851 C00487363 AMERICAN CROSSROADS $1,016,349 C00075820 NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE $810,157 C00507525 WINNING OUR FUTURE $788,381 C00442319 REPUBLICAN MAJORITY CAMPAIGN $710,400 C00503417 RED WHITE AND BLUE FUND $573,680 C00448696 SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND $479,867 C90012758 CITIZENS FOR A WORKING AMERICA INC. $475,000 C00484642 MAJORITY PAC $471,728 C00495861 PRIORITIES USA ACTION $306,229 C00495010 CAMPAIGN TO DEFEAT BARACK OBAMA $266,432 C00499020 FREEDOMWORKS FOR AMERICA $241,542 C00504241 9-9-9 FUND $226,530 C00498261 RESTORING PROSPERITY FUND $202,873 C00503870 RETHINK PAC $156,000 C00432260 CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC $145,459 C90011057 NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE $142,841 C00454074 OUR COUNTRY DESERVES BETTER PAC - TEAPARTYEXPRESS.ORG $141,526 C00473918 WOMEN VOTE! $133,976 C00508317 LEADERS FOR FAMILIES SUPER PAC INC $122,767 C00488486 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA WORKING VOICES $107,000 C00492116 COOPERATIVE OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS IE COMMITTEE $102,184 C90011230 AMERICAN ACTION NETWORK INC $96,694 C00348540 1199 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT'L UNION FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION FUND $83,975 C00505081 STRONG AMERICA NOW SUPER PAC
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Unlearned—The Gun Lobby and the Siren Song of Anti
    Lessons Unlearned The Gun Lobby and the Siren Song of Anti-Government Rhetoric Violence Policy Center April 2010 The Violence Policy Center (VPC) is a national non-profit educational organization that conducts research and public education on violence in America and provides information and analysis to policymakers, journalists, advocates, and the general public. This report was authored by VPC Executive Director Josh Sugarmann and VPC Policy Analyst Marty Langley. The study was funded in part with the support of the David Bohnett Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, and the Public Welfare Foundation. Past studies released by the VPC include: ! Target: Law Enforcement—Assault Weapons in the News (February 2010) ! Black Homicide Victimization in the United States: An Analysis of 2007 Homicide Data (January 2010) ! When Men Murder Women—An Analysis of 2007 Homicide Data (September 2009) ! Law Enforcement and Private Citizens Killed by Concealed Handgun Permit Holders—An Analysis of News Reports, May 2007 to April 2009 (July 2009) ! Indicted: Types of Firearms and Methods of Gun Trafficking from the United States to Mexico as Revealed in U.S. Court Documents (April 2009) ! Iron River: Gun Violence and Illegal Firearms Trafficking on the U.S.-Mexico Border (March 2009) ! Youth Gang Violence and Guns: Data Collection in California (February 2009) ! “Big Boomers”—Rifle Power Designed Into Handguns (December 2008) ! American Roulette: Murder-Suicide in the United States (April 2008) ! An Analysis of the Decline in Gun Dealers: 1994 to 2007 (August
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Stephen King: Issues of Censorship, Student Choice, and Popular Literature
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 414 606 CS 216 137 AUTHOR Power, Brenda Miller, Ed.; Wilhelm, Jeffrey D., Ed.; Chandler, Kelly, Ed. TITLE Reading Stephen King: Issues of Censorship, Student Choice, and Popular Literature. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL. ISBN ISBN-0-8141-3905-1 PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 246p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 39051-0015: $14.95 members, $19.95 nonmembers). PUB TYPE Collected Works - General (020) Opinion Papers (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Censorship; Critical Thinking; *Fiction; Literature Appreciation; *Popular Culture; Public Schools; Reader Response; *Reading Material Selection; Reading Programs; Recreational Reading; Secondary Education; *Student Participation IDENTIFIERS *Contemporary Literature; Horror Fiction; *King (Stephen); Literary Canon; Response to Literature; Trade Books ABSTRACT This collection of essays grew out of the "Reading Stephen King Conference" held at the University of Mainin 1996. Stephen King's books have become a lightning rod for the tensions around issues of including "mass market" popular literature in middle and 1.i.gh school English classes and of who chooses what students read. King's fi'tion is among the most popular of "pop" literature, and among the most controversial. These essays spotlight the ways in which King's work intersects with the themes of the literary canon and its construction and maintenance, censorship in public schools, and the need for adolescent readers to be able to choose books in school reading programs. The essays and their authors are: (1) "Reading Stephen King: An Ethnography of an Event" (Brenda Miller Power); (2) "I Want to Be Typhoid Stevie" (Stephen King); (3) "King and Controversy in Classrooms: A Conversation between Teachers and Students" (Kelly Chandler and others); (4) "Of Cornflakes, Hot Dogs, Cabbages, and King" (Jeffrey D.
    [Show full text]
  • Protect Children, Not Guns 2019 1 Introduction
    PROTECT CHILDREN NOT GUNS 2019 Mission Statement he Children’s Defense Fund Leave No Child Behind® mission is to ensure every child a T Healthy Start, a Head Start, a Fair Start, a Safe Start and a Moral Start in life and successful passage to adulthood with the help of caring families and communities. For over 40 years, CDF has provided a strong, effective and independent voice for all the children of America who cannot vote, lobby or speak for themselves. We pay particular attention to the needs of poor and minority children and those with disabilities. CDF educates the nation about the needs of children and encourages preventive investments before they get sick, drop out of school, get into trouble or suffer family breakdown. © 2019 Children’s Defense Fund. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................... 2 Overview .............................................................. 5 Select Shootings Involving Children in the Past 12 Months. 7 Child and Teen Gun Deaths ..........................................11 Child and Teen Gun Injuries .........................................19 International Gun Death Comparisons ..............................23 Progress Since Parkland .............................................29 We Can Do Better: We Must Strengthen Laws to Save Lives. .33 Stand Up and Take Action ...........................................39 Appendices .......................................................... 41 Endnotes ............................................................50 Protect Children, Not Guns 2019 1 Introduction On April 20, 1999, Americans witnessed a once unthinkable and now unforgettable tragedy at Columbine High School. We watched in horror as frightened children fled with their hands up, frantic parents tried to reunite with their children, and traumatized survivors told reporters about the violence they witnessed. It was the first time many of us saw these terrifying scenes. But it was far from the last.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Background Over the Past Several Years, Gun Violence
    Gun Violence Prevention Background NFTY Mechina 2015 Issue Background Over the past several years, gun violence prevention has once again been at the forefront of North American political discourse, spurred in large part by the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, the Navy Yard shooting in Washington, D.C., and the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut, among others. The costs of gun violence in the United States are staggering: Consider these numbers: 8: Each day, eight young Americans under age 19 die from gun violence. 12: The rate of gun deaths among America’s children is 12 times higher than those of the 25 other wealthiest nations combined. 30,000: Over 30,000 Americans die each year from gun violence. $100 Billion: The estimated medical and social cost of gun violence in America, every single year. Nearly 80% of this cost is borne by taxpayers. The vast majority of Americans, even gun owners, support common sense gun safety measures. According to the National Opinion Research Center, 75% of gun owners support mandatory registration of handguns, as does 85% of the general public. 66% of gun owners and 80% of the general public favor mandatory background checks in private handgun sales, such as gun shows. However, some Americans believe that such gun control measures are unnecessary, ineffective, and contrary to the wording and spirit of the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which states, “A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Groups such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) argue that law-abiding citizens, like hunters and sportsmen, will suffer the most under restrictive gun control laws, while criminals will always be able to access guns no matter what restrictions or gun control measures are enacted.
    [Show full text]
  • J a C K Kirb Y C Olle C T Or F If T Y- Nine $ 10
    JACK KIRBY COLLECTOR FIFTY-NINE $10 FIFTY-NINE COLLECTOR KIRBY JACK IT CAN’T BE! BUT IT IS! I’VE DISCOVERED... ...THE AND NOTHING WILL EVER BE THE SAME AGAIN!! 95 A TREASURE TROVE OF RARITIES BY THE “KING” OF COMICS! Contents THE OLD(?) The Kirby Vault! OPENING SHOT . .2 (is a boycott right for you?) KIRBY OBSCURA . .4 (Barry Forshaw’s alarmed) ISSUE #59, SUMMER 2012 C o l l e c t o r JACK F.A.Q.s . .7 (Mark Evanier on inkers and THE WONDER YEARS) AUTEUR THEORY OF COMICS . .11 (Arlen Schumer on who and what makes a comic book) KIRBY KINETICS . .27 (Norris Burroughs’ new column is anything but marginal) INCIDENTAL ICONOGRAPHY . .30 (the shape of shields to come) FOUNDATIONS . .32 (ever seen these Kirby covers?) INFLUENCEES . .38 (Don Glut shows us a possible devil in the details) INNERVIEW . .40 (Scott Fresina tells us what really went on in the Kirby household) KIRBY AS A GENRE . .42 (Adam McGovern & an occult fave) CUT-UPS . .45 (Steven Brower on Jack’s collages) GALLERY 1 . .49 (Kirby collages in FULL-COLOR) UNEARTHED . .54 (bootleg Kirby album covers) JACK KIRBY MUSEUM PAGE . .55 (visit & join www.kirbymuseum.org) GALLERY 2 . .56 (unused DC artwork) TRIBUTE . .64 (the 2011 Kirby Tribute Panel) GALLERY 3 . .78 (a go-go girl from SOUL LOVE) UNEARTHED . .88 (Kirby’s Someday Funnies) COLLECTOR COMMENTS . .90 PARTING SHOT . .100 Front cover inks: JOE SINNOTT Back cover inks: DON HECK Back cover colors: JACK KIRBY (an unused 1966 promotional piece, courtesy of Heritage Auctions) This issue would not have been If you’re viewing a Digital possible without the help of the JACK Edition of this publication, KIRBY MUSEUM & RESEARCH CENTER (www.kirbymuseum.org) and PLEASE READ THIS: www.whatifkirby.com—thanks! This is copyrighted material, NOT intended for downloading anywhere except our The Jack Kirby Collector, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • National Press Club Luncheon with Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence
    NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LUNCHEON WITH PAUL HELMKE, PRESIDENT OF THE BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE SUBJECT: GUN VIOLENCE IN AMERICA MODERATOR: JERRY ZREMSKI, PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LOCATION: NATIONAL PRESS CLUB BALLROOM, WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME: 1:00 P.M. EDT DATE: TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2007 (C) COPYRIGHT 2005, FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC., 1000 VERMONT AVE. NW; 5TH FLOOR; WASHINGTON, DC - 20005, USA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES A MISAPPROPRIATION UNDER APPLICABLE UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW, AND FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PURSUE ALL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO IT IN RESPECT TO SUCH MISAPPROPRIATION. FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. IS A PRIVATE FIRM AND IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. NO COPYRIGHT IS CLAIMED AS TO ANY PART OF THE ORIGINAL WORK PREPARED BY A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AS PART OF THAT PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES. FOR INFORMATION ON SUBSCRIBING TO FNS, PLEASE CALL JACK GRAEME AT 202-347-1400. ------------------------- MR. ZREMSKI: (Sounds gavel.) Good afternoon and welcome to the National Press Club. My name is Jerry Zremski, and I'm the Washington bureau chief for the Buffalo News and president of the National Press Club. I'd like to welcome club members and their guests who are here today, as well as those of you who are watching on C-SPAN. We're looking forward to today's speech, and afterwards I will ask as many questions as time permits. Please hold your applause during the speech so that we have as much time for questions as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Rifle Association and the White Male Identity
    The National Rifle Association and the White Male Identity Examining the intersection of identity with regard to race, gender, and citizenship status within the parameters of the NRA and its espoused rhetoric 12/21/2012 Columbia University; Professor J.Sorett Eliana Rae Eitches Eitches 1 On Friday, July 20, 2012, James Holmes entered a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado armed with a 100-round drum magazine, a Smith & Wesson M&P15 assault rifle (the “civilian version of the Military’s M-16) capable of firing 60 bullets per minute, a Remington shotgun, and a .40 caliber handgun .i On that day, Holmes used those weapons to shoot 71 people, twelve of whom died. Less than six months later, on December 14, 2012, 20-year old Adam Lanza, immediately after shooting and killing his mother in their home, proceeded to Sandy Hook Elementary School where he shot and killed 26 people - 20 children and 6 adults - before killing himself. After the bodies were carried away, the final body count stood at 28, making it the second most deadly school shooting in United States history.ii In response to Aurora, many cried for stricter gun control laws while others determined to arm themselves: Colorado saw a 41% increase in background checks for hopeful gun owners in the direct aftermath of the incident, a response “not unusual” after a mass shooting.iii Media attention was lavished on these two aforementioned mass murders because their spectacular violence and seemingly-random nature incites the curiosity of the nation; synchronously, the attention these events receive is disproportionate compared to the negligible attention received by the 276 people shot daily in the United States, 84 of whom will die as a result of their injuries.iv Yet, it is these mass violence spectacles that demonstrate why the debate surrounding gun control and gun protection is so fierce: incidences of mass violence either incite fear, causing one to support protection measures via gun ownership or via stricter gun legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • COMICS Viva Il Re! L a Vita E Le Opere Del Co-Creatore Della Marvel
    ADM Editore - nr. 35 settembre/ottobre 2017 Metti in collaborazione con Sui Fu FuMetti e Ale A StA Digit lA Rivi FUMETTO E SCUOLA l a parola a laura Scarpa e Paolo Forni SBAM!COMICS VIVA IL RE! l a vita e le opere del co-creatore della Marvel www.sbamcomics.it RE DEL TERRORE 100 ANNI DI JACK KIRBY ... IN CAMPO l otti e Mainardi ci raccontano Drawing by Ron Frenz, inks by Sal Buscema - Captain America © Marvel Comics America © Marvel - Captain Sal Buscema by inks Frenz, Ron by Drawing INTERVISTA ESCLUSIVA A il Diabolik “calcistico” FUMETTI RON FRENZ b ondi-leone-nanni L’ulTIMO DEI KIRBYANI! antonio Pannullo Fascinella-Zuppini NOVITÀ! arrivano in libreria gli IN QUESTO NUMERO 35 4 Pre-cover Dall’esperienza della rivista digitale fumettosa più bella di tutti i tempi, lo Sbam-sito ecco nelle migliori librerie i primi titoli della nostra nuovissima collana http://sbamcomics.it/ di volumi: sono nati gli Sbam! libri. Tutti i dettagli dell’iniziativa. 12 i n copertina SBAM!COMICS Il centenario del Re del Fumetto, Jack Kirby: per celebrarlo come si deve, abbiamo intervistato l’eccellente Ron Frenz, ultimo dei kirbyani e copertinista d’eccezione di questo numero di Sbam!, e ripercorso Sbam! Comics è la rivista digitale l’incredibile carriera del King! completamente gratuita per tutti 76 Fumetto e scuola Fortunatamente, sono ormai molto lontani i tempi in cui nelle scuole gli appassionati di fumetti: è diffusa la Sbam-vetrina dei nostri libri www.sbamcomics.it/sbamlibri vigeva il più assoluto ostracismo per i fumetti. Ma oggi, che rapporto c’è tra scuola e Nona Arte? Lo abbiamo chiesto a chi di insegnamento ogni due mesi tramite il sito del Fumetto se ne intende, laura Scarpa, e a un docente che propone www.sbamcomics.it.
    [Show full text]
  • Economists, Management Profs to Join PPS Faculty in Fall ’06 (Continued from Page 1) Comes, the Effects of He Spent Eight Months Collecting Data in Since 1979
    Spring 2006 TERRY SANFORD Duke University INSTITUTE OF Inside 2/ Payne leaving Institute PUBLIC POLICY 5/ New members join BOV 8/ Where’s FEMA’s home? 11/ Effects of older students 14/ Faculty honors 15/ Alumni news Focus Students present Economists, management profs health research to join PPS faculty in fall ’06 to state, federal our new faculty members will come on Jim provide the right balance of federal and policymakers board this fall, including economists state experience to build on the pioneering F Elizabeth Oltmans Ananat and Marc contributions that Art Spengler made to our Health policy students at both the Bellemare, and professors of the practice program.” Spengler ended his Duke teaching Thomas Taylor and James Johnson. stint this spring after seven years with the graduate and undergraduate level “I am extremely enthusiastic about these Institute. (See story, page 4). presented their research directly to appointments,” said Institute Director Bruce Ananat will join the Institute faculty as an federal,state and local policymakers Kuniholm. “In every case they were the top assistant professor of PPS, with a secondary ap- this spring, on current issues such as candidates in the search. Liz and Marc, while pointment in Duke’s economics department. reauthorization of the Ryan White newly minted PhDs, are extremely bright and She is completing a PhD in economics at the CARE Act, insurance premium assis- well qualified and will make excellent col- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. tance under the N.C. Medicaid pro- leagues who, right off the bat, will make signifi- She has conducted research on the effect of gram and improved health care for cant contributions to our program.
    [Show full text]