DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on “Enriched Case Method”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on “Enriched Case Method” The Pushy Pedagogy of Pierson v. Post and the Fading Federalism of James Kent∗ “[W]hatever it is that the law is after[,] it is not the whole story” - Clifford Geertz1 Pierson v. Post – the famous New York foxhunting case – is usually used to introduce students to the concept of possession in property law. An exotic majority opinion (with long Latin passages and references to far flung sources) by Judge Tompkins and an almost farcical dissent by Judge Livingston, combine to make the New York Supreme Court decision memorable. The Chief Justice of the court when the case was decided, James Kent, is rarely mentioned in connection with it. However, annotations he made on his copy of the case and later use of it in his own work, Kent’s Commentaries, evidence a level of interest beyond the casual, making one wonder whether he played a role in the affair greater than his silence at the time would indicate. This paper argues that Kent was responsible – either directly or indirectly – for the learned way in which the case was dealt with, both by the lawyers who argued it and by the majority Judge Tompkins. It is as if Kent treated these more junior legal personnel as students, setting them to do their best on a chestnut Roman and civil law problem: how does one acquire property in wild animals? Kent would have had two motives for doing this, which this paper explores. First, to provide a pedagogical exercise for junior members of the bar and bench, whom he wanted to train to work with foreign authorities and speak in the scholarly style he thought should characterize American legal debate. Second, to create an American precedent on a classic issue that Blackstone gave no guidance on, which Kent and those interested in creating scholarly scientific law for the new nation could cite in their written work. This is a story, in other words, of Kent profiting from what is termed here his pushy pedagogy and the proprietary approach he took to the New York Supreme Court, its reports, and its personnel. As one of the fading Federalists of the early nineteenth century, Kent would have been increasingly aware that didactic influence through the courts and his scholarly work would soon be all he had left. The argument is that Pierson v. Post – a case about which many legal scholars have had much to say – is best understood in terms of his influence. ∗ Angela Fernandez, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto. This paper has been presented at the Law & Society Meeting in Baltimore, Maryland, July 2006, and the Legal History Group at the Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, March 2006 and January 2007. Many thanks to Andrea McDowell, Bethany Berger, Debora Threedy, Robert Gordon, Stephen Waddams, Darlene Johnston, Blaine Baker, Lisa Austin, Denise Réaume, Karen Knop, Michael Marrus, and Philip Girard. Conversations with Donald Roper have also been helpful. Thanks also to Helen Weltin, Manuscripts and Special Collections, New York State Library, Cultural Education Center, Albany, N.Y., Whitney Bagnell, Librarian for Special Collections in Law, Columbia University, staff at the New York State Library’s Newspaper Project, Cultural Education Center, Albany, N.Y. and those at the law library “infoexpress” service at the Faculty of Law, University of Toronto. The paper profited greatly from work done by my research assistant, Alex Zavaglia, during the summer of 2006. Comments and suggestions from Matias Milet are also appreciated. 1 CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167, 173 (1983). 2 I. Introduction Of the countless people who have read Pierson v. Post, many of them have probably thought there was something odd about it, sensing eccentricity but unable to put their finger on the problem.2 There is the comic mode of the Livingston dissent, its curiously inaccurate understanding of foxhunting, and the issue of how much of it should be taken seriously.3 There is the human/economic question: why would the litigants spend the amounts needed to establish rights over something of so little value and seemingly so insignificant? The answer usually given has been human willfulness.4 However, that response does not address the institutional question that cries out for explanation, namely why the lawyers and judges involved in the case would lavish such care on a neighborhood feud? The stubbornness of the litigants cannot explain why a court like the New York Supreme Court would expend the kind of energy it did on a dispute about a fox pelt worth about a dollar in a case that given a more ordinary treatment no one would have thought was worth reporting.5 The answer I propose has less to do with what happened in Sag Harbor, Long Island sometime in 1804, than with events supposed to be unfolding further north, in James Kent’s court in Albany in 1805, namely how the case ended up being treated as it was at the New York Supreme Court. As I see and tell it, the dispute over the fox presented a twofold opportunity Kent and those under his influence at that court would 2 Pierson v. Post, 3 Cai. R. 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1805). Pinpoint cites are to the page numbers in the second edition of Caines Reports, 1814, which is reproduced in Appendix I. See infra note 78, for full bibliographical information. 3 See Andrea McDowell, Legal Fictions in Pierson v. Post, 105 MICH. L. REV. 735 (2007). 4 See Bethany R. Berger, It's Not About the Fox: The Untold History of Pierson v. Post, 55 DUKE L.J. 1089 (2006). 5 See McDowell, supra note 3, at 763 (providing prices of fox pelts, $1 being the market price in 1815). See also Sharpe v. Sabin (1796) (virtually identical unreported case identified and reproduced by McDowell, supra note 3, at 777). 3 have seized: first, to have a scholarly debate on an old vexing question (how does one acquire possession in wild animals); and second, to generate a home-grown American precedent on the point (he who seizes takes). Although there is no “smoking gun” that proves beyond a doubt that Kent arranged for the case to be heard for the reasons I suggest, there is ample circumstantial evidence of his involvement. And there is certainly no denying that he was later intensely interested in the case – as annotations he made on his copy of the case and subsequent treatment in his famous work Kent’s Commentaries show. James Kent was Chief Justice of the New York Supreme Court the year Pierson v. Post was decided.6 Probably because he was silent in the reported case – the majority decision was written by Daniel Tompkins, accompanied by a striking dissent by Brockholst Livingston – Kent is rarely mentioned in connection with it. However, annotations Kent made on his copy of the case and his later use of it in Kent’s Commentaries show an intense learned interest in it, both of which beg for explanation. This paper argues that the level and type of interest Kent took in the case strongly suggest that it was he who was responsible for the scholarly way in which it was treated at the New York Supreme Court, either directly or indirectly. This is a theory that would 6 There is no recent biography of Kent. There is, however, an older biography, JOHN THEODORE HORTON, JAMES KENT: A STUDY IN CONSERVATISM, 1763-1847 (1939). See also WILLIAM KENT, MEMOIRES AND LETTERS OF JAMES KENT (1898). There is a helpful article by John Langbein, on which I rely, particularly for its notion of “learnedness” and its connection to Kent. See John H. Langbein, Chancellor Kent and the History of Legal Literature, 93 COLUM. L. REV. 547, 566-70 (1993). See also D.W. Raack, To Preserve the Best Fruits: The Legal Thought of Chancellor James Kent, 33 AM. J. LEGAL HIST. 320 (1989); Carl F. Stychin, The Commentaries of Chancellor James Kent and the Development of an American Common Law, 37 AM. J. LEGAL HIST. 440 (1993); GREGORY S. ALEXANDER, COMMODITY AND PROPRIETY: COMPETING VISIONS OF PROPERTY IN AMERICAN THOUGHT, 1776-1970, 127-57 (1997); DANIEL J. HULSEBOSCH, CONSTITUTING EMPIRE: NEW YORK AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE ATLANTIC WORLD, 1664-1830, 274-302 (2005). 4 explain the exaggerated styles of the decisions, both majority and dissent, which have gone unaccounted for in other analyses of the case. We will see that Tompkins’s majority opinion is nothing like any other decision he wrote. Its long Latin passages and references to eminent legal scholars, particularly civilian authors, were very unusual for him.7 Indeed, a review of three volumes of New York Supreme Court decisions from the period demonstrates that there was something very special about Pierson v. Post.8 This is not a case that happened to illustrate the concept of first possession in the context of the classic Roman and civil law demonstration of the point, namely wild animals. Kent, intimately familiar with the sources in which that classic treatment occurred, would have immediately seen in the facts of the case – an argument over a fox – an opportunity deliberately to generate an American version of that debate and answer for America the question Blackstone left unanswered. The idea is that he would have pushed those under his tutelage at the New York Supreme Court to approach the case as that kind of opportunity. Why would Kent act as this kind of pushy preceptor? He would have had at least two motives for encouraging it to be treated in the elaborate way that it was in his court.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KI LAW of INDIGENOUS PEOPLES KI Law Of
    KI LAW OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES KI Law of indigenous peoples Class here works on the law of indigenous peoples in general For law of indigenous peoples in the Arctic and sub-Arctic, see KIA20.2-KIA8900.2 For law of ancient peoples or societies, see KL701-KL2215 For law of indigenous peoples of India (Indic peoples), see KNS350-KNS439 For law of indigenous peoples of Africa, see KQ2010-KQ9000 For law of Aboriginal Australians, see KU350-KU399 For law of indigenous peoples of New Zealand, see KUQ350- KUQ369 For law of indigenous peoples in the Americas, see KIA-KIX Bibliography 1 General bibliography 2.A-Z Guides to law collections. Indigenous law gateways (Portals). Web directories. By name, A-Z 2.I53 Indigenous Law Portal. Law Library of Congress 2.N38 NativeWeb: Indigenous Peoples' Law and Legal Issues 3 Encyclopedias. Law dictionaries For encyclopedias and law dictionaries relating to a particular indigenous group, see the group Official gazettes and other media for official information For departmental/administrative gazettes, see the issuing department or administrative unit of the appropriate jurisdiction 6.A-Z Inter-governmental congresses and conferences. By name, A- Z Including intergovernmental congresses and conferences between indigenous governments or those between indigenous governments and federal, provincial, or state governments 8 International intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) 10-12 Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) Inter-regional indigenous organizations Class here organizations identifying, defining, and representing the legal rights and interests of indigenous peoples 15 General. Collective Individual. By name 18 International Indian Treaty Council 20.A-Z Inter-regional councils. By name, A-Z Indigenous laws and treaties 24 Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Restorative Justice Policy in Context: a Legal‑Archaeological Analysis
    Int J Semiot Law https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09747-0 Restorative Justice Policy in Context: A Legal‑Archaeological Analysis Giuseppe Maglione1 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract This paper provides an original, in-depth analysis of English and Welsh criminal and penal policy on restorative justice. By using a historically-discursive approach— legal archaeology—this study frstly outlines the overarching representations of restorative justice within policy, unpacking their internal organisation. Then, it inter- prets such patterns of knowledge in light of specifc cultural, political and profes- sional transformations involving the Anglo-Welsh criminal justice feld over the last 30 years. Along these lines, it generates a historically documented policy map whilst problematising the taken-for-granted images of restorative justice which populate regulations, codes and laws. This has implications for the study of the relationships between restorative justice policy and practice and for future research on the insti- tutionalisation of this ‘new’ frontier of penality. More generally, the exploration of (unexpected) links between policy, politics and culture, provides material for a criti- cal assessment of how state agencies appropriate community-based and practice-led forms of justice. Keywords Restorative justice · Reparation · Legal archaeology · Discourses · England and Wales 1 Introduction Criminologists and legal scholars have hailed restorative justice (RJ) as one of the most ‘signifcant developments in criminal justice and criminological practice and thinking’ [21: 19] over the last 30 years, globally. Although defnitions of RJ are contested [68], there is a recurrent assumption delimiting this concept: people directly involved in a crime should have a say on how to deal with its consequences [10, 132, 139].
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 1994 The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State Gary Lawson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons THE RISE AND RISE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Gary Lawson* The post-New Deal administrative state is unconstitutional,' and its validation by the legal system amounts to nothing less than a bloodless constitutional revolution. 2 The original New Dealers were aware, at least to some degree, that their vision of the national gov- ernment's proper role and structure could not be squared with the written Constitution: 3 The Administrative Process, James Landis's classic exposition of the New Deal model of administration, fairly drips with contempt for the idea of a limited national government subject to a formal, tripartite separation of powers. 4 Faced with a choice between the administrative state and the Constitution, the architects of our modern government chose the administrative state, and their choice has stuck. There is a perception among some observers, however, that this post-New Deal consensus has recently come under serious legal attack, * Associate Professor, Northwestern University School of Law. B.A. ig8o, Claremont Men's College; J.D. 1983, Yale Law School. I am grateful to Robert W. Bennett, Steven G. Calabresi, Cynthia R. Farina, Patricia B. Granger, Daniel Polsby, Martin H. Redish, Jennifer Roback, Marshall Shapo, and the participants at colloquia at Cornell Law School and Northwestern University School of Law for their insightful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Legal History Matters
    293 WHY LEGAL HISTORY MATTERS Jim Phillips* This is the text of Professor Phillips' Salmond Lecture delivered at the Victoria University of Wellington Law Faculty on 24 June 2010. In it Professor Phillips makes the case for why legal history matters both for lawyers and historians and argues for a continued contextual approach to the study of legal history. I INTRODUCTION Chief Justice, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. I am greatly honoured by the invitation to deliver the Salmond Lecture. I have long known of John Salmond as the author of one of the leading early twentieth century textbooks on torts, and as someone who also wrote about legal history. What I had not known before I worked on this lecture was what a remarkable and varied career he had, as legislator, diplomat and judge as well as legal scholar.1 It is indeed humbling to be giving a lecture named after such a towering figure. John Salmond's work on torts also made him a significant figure in the legal history of his period, something I will return to later. I like to think he would have approved of someone being asked to reflect generally about legal history and its importance. Whether he would have approved of the content of my remarks is another question. When I told a friend of mine about my visit here, to talk about why legal history matters as a prelude to a legal history conference, she suggested that New Zealand is a long way to go to preach to * Professor, Faculty of Law, Department of History, and Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto; Editor-in-Chief, Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    The Archaeological Resources Protection Act, other federal legislation, and the protection of cultural resources in the United States Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Martin, Daniel Gordon, 1963- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 21:22:10 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/276621 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of MEETING of the CITY COUNCIL of BUDA, TX 6:00 PM - Tuesday, September 17, 2019 Joint Meeting with the Parks Commission Council Chambers, Room 1098 405 E
    NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BUDA, TX 6:00 PM - Tuesday, September 17, 2019 Joint Meeting with the Parks Commission Council Chambers, Room 1098 405 E. Loop Street, Building 100 Buda, TX 78610 This notice is posted pursuant to the Texas Open Meetings Act. Notice is hereby given that a Regular City Council Meeting of the City of Buda, TX, will be held at which time the following subjects will be discussed and may be acted upon. A. CALL TO ORDER Please turn off your cell phone when you approach the podium. B. INVOCATION C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. ROLL CALL E. ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST Downtown Association Finalist Announcement Sept. 20 - Fall in Love Downtown/Main Street Sept. 29 - Green Meadows Splash Pad will be closed Oct. 1 - National Night Out Oct. 26 - Boo-da Halloween & Sponsorships F. RECOGNITION F.1. Recipient of the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award, the City of Buda, for the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Budget from Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) GFOA Award FY2018-19.pdf GFOA City of Buda Receives Prestigious Budget Presentation Award For Second Consecutive Year 1.pdf G. PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time, comments will be taken from the audience on non-agenda related topics for a length of time not to exceed three minutes per person. To address the City Council, please submit a Citizen’s Comment form to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. No action may be taken by the City Council during Public Comments. H. CONSENT AGENDA 1 City Council Agenda Page 1 September 17, 2019 All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Full PDF of This Issue
    40-5: Access to Justice Table of Contents Featured Articles: Access to Justice Special Report: The Law and Work Departments Columns Featured Articles: Access to Justice This issue of LawNow looks at problems of access to justice in some unique situations and settings. The Right to Counsel Includes Access to Counsel Lorraine Snyder An accused’s ability to seek the advice of a lawyer is an important Charter right that cannot be ignored or violated. The Right to Online Research Behind Bars Sarah Burton Access to justice can include the right of an imprisoned accused to conduct online legal research. Access to Justice: Potential Alternatives for Indigenous Peoples Troy Hunter For Indigenous people, the question of access to justice remains outstanding. Could Indigenous legal traditions be revived? 1 Crowdfunding: Leveling the Playing Field Avnish Nanda Justicefundr is the first crowdfunding platform in Canada designed to help Canadians get their day in court. Access to Legal Services in Women’s Shelters Alysia Wright Women who flee to shelters because of domestic violence often have trouble accessing the legal information and services they desperately need. Special Report: The Law and Work Canadian Unions: From Repression and Resistance to the Right to Strike Paul Maas and Owen LeBlanc The development of unions in Canada is fascinating history encompassing influences from Great Britain and the United States. Tips and Gratuities: Some Taxing Issues Caitlin Butler Both employers and employees have responsibilities when it comes to accounting
    [Show full text]
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia
    HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES LATVIA Volume 23, Issue 1 (Spring-Summer 2015) University of Latvia CONTENTS From the Editor .......................................................................................... 3 Andrejs Veisbergs Formation of the Image of Latvians in Anglophone Sources (16th-20th centuries) ..................................................................................... 4 Kristīne Rotbaha Latvian Legal Folklore: Briefly Researched. Forbidden. Forgotten? ......... 24 Brigita Zepa, Evija Kļave, Inese Šūpule Russian-Latvian Language Conflict in Urban Settings in Latvia ............... 42 Pēteris Zvidriņš, Atis Bērziņš Dynamics of Ethnic Structures in the Baltic States .................................. 65 Roger A. Ritvo, Edite Bauska, Sintija Broka, Peteris Bukovskis, Laimdota Jarmusevica, Kristine Zelenivska Public Attitudes toward Cultural NGOs in Latvia: Implications for Business, Government and NGO Partnerships in an Emerging Civil Society ................................................................................................ 75 Ivars Kassalis Economic Performance of the Riga Port Cluster ....................................... 87 Edgars Rožāns The Socioeconomic Impact of Economic Freedom ................................... 105 The Authors ................................................................................................ 126 FROM THE EDITOR Dear Reader, This is the first issue for 2015 and we expect to be able to publish the next issue in autumn-winter 2015. The authors are mainly both
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution !
    T H E T E ! T - B O O K T H E C O N S T I T U I T O N . M GN C R ’ ON OF R G A A HA TA , THE PETITI I HT S , A ND THE BILL OF RIGHT S . S R L N S ND S N R S N WITH HI TO ICA COMME T , A REMARK O THE P E E T POLITICAL EMERGENCIES . E B Y E. S. C R A Y S M A . , . , B A B E I S I‘ ‘ E R -A P' L A W PR FE S S R O F HI ST R Y I N U N I V E R S I TY C LLE G E L N D N ; O O O O , O O ; ’ L A I' ‘ I F ELL W P N LLE E E O K I G S C G C A M B R ID G . O O , fifin M a na C harta th e Pe i ionof Ri h ts and th e Bil l o f Ri h s f orm th e cod e hi h I g , t t g , g t , w c call ” th e Bib l e of th e Enl i sh Co s i ution —L BD H THA g n t t . O C A M . —o L O N D O N R C R N Y R NG ON R I HA D BE TLE , BU LI T ST EET , auhtfs m' in(Brittan ' i b y to 3921 majesty .
    [Show full text]
  • Rise of Global Delivery Services
    The Rise of Global Delivery Services The Rise of Global Delivery Services A Case Study in International Regulatory Reform James I. Campbell Jr. JCampbell Press Washington, D.C. iv THE RISE OF GLOBAL DELIVERY SERVICES Published by JCampbell Press http://www.jcampbell.com © 2001 by James I. Campbell Jr. All rights reserved. First edition, 2001 Printed in the United States of America Publisher’s Cataloging-in-Publication (Provided by Quality Books, Inc.) Campbell, James I. The rise of global delivery services : a case study in international regulatory reform / James I. Campbell Jr. -- 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. LCCN: 2001118245 ISBN: 0-9711864-0-5 1. Postal service--International cooperation. 2. Postal service--Law and legislation. 3. Express service --Law and legislation. I. Title. HE6076.C36 2001 383'.4 QBI01-201146 To James Ira Campbell, F.A.I.A. Contents Acknowledgments .....................................ix 1. Global Delivery Services and Regulatory Reform . 1 P ART 1. U.S. P OSTAL M ONOPOLY 2. Overview: U.S. Postal Monopoly . 17 3. DHL Comment on Postal Monopoly Regulations (1979) . 32 4. DHL Testimony on International Couriers (1979) . 62 P ART 2. E XCESS B AGGAGE C HARGES 5. Overview: Excess Baggage Charges . 79 6. DHL Statement on CAB Sunset (1981) . 91 P ART 3. U.S. C USTOMS R ESTRICTIONS 7. Overview: U.S. Customs Restrictions . 119 8. DHL Comment in Courier Service Inquiry (1980) . 129 9. DHL Testimony on H.R. 5170 (1982) . 140 P ART 4. E UROPEAN P OSTAL M ONOPOLIES 10. Overview: European Postal Monopolies . 147 11. ICC Report to the European Commission (1983) .
    [Show full text]
  • The New Nuisance: an Antidote to Wetland Loss, Sprawl, and Global Warming, 48 B.C
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 11-1-2007 The ewN Nuisance: An Antidote to Wetland Loss, Sprawl, and Global Warming Christine A. Klein University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Land Use Planning Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Christine A. Klein, The New Nuisance: An Antidote to Wetland Loss, Sprawl, and Global Warming, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1155 (2007), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW NUISANCE: AN ANTIDOTE TO WETLAND LOSS, SPRAWL, AND GLOBAL WARMING CHRISTINE A. KLEIN* Abstract: Marking the fifteenth anniversary of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council-the modern U.S. Supreme Court's seminal regulatory takings decision-this Article surveys Lucas's impact upon regulations that restrict wedand filling, sprawling development, and the emission of greenhouse gases. The Lucas Court set forth a new categorical rule of governmental liability for regulations that prohibit all economically bene- ficial use of land, but also established a new defense that draws upon the states' common law of nuisance and property. Unexpectedly, that defense has taken on a life of its own-forming what this Article calls the new nui- sance doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd 2013 F Hodous, Toluid Dynamics of Asia
    Toluid Dynamics of Asia: flexibility, legality and identity within Toluid institutions Florence Hodous Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD in History 2013 Department of History School of Oriental and African Studies University of London 2 Abstract This thesis will show that the concept of Great Yasa is not supported by the contemporary sources and that alternative approaches are needed to investigate law in the Toluid empire. While the concept of Yasa tends to reinforce the perception of Mongol law as being rigid, in fact, considerable room for flexibility and negotiation was embedded within the Mongol legal tradition. This flexibility can be seen in the traditional Mongol institution of the quriltai, an institution which was important not only in terms of the election of khans and taking various decisions, but also in legal terms. The principle of collegiality which was at its foundation was central to Mongol legal culture and its effects can be discerned in the Ilkhanate and the Yuan dynasty. While there was little political will on the part of the Mongol rulers to impose any particular legal practices, including Mongol customs, on the conquered populations, the principle of collegiality had a significant impact on how they dealt with legal matters, and how they and their officials interacted with Persian and Chinese legal traditions. In the many legal cases decided by conference, where many different stakeholders were present, can be seen the enduring effects of the principle of collegiality. The flexibility of the Mongol approach to law is also seen in the differences in the influence of Mongol law in Persia and China.
    [Show full text]