Finding Exurbia: America's Fast-Growing Communities at the Metropolitan Fringe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Finding Exurbia: America's Fast-Growing Communities at the Metropolitan Fringe Metropolitan Policy Program Finding Exurbia: America’s Fast-Growing Communities at the Metropolitan Fringe Alan Berube, Audrey Singer, Jill H. Wilson, and William H. Frey Findings This study details a new effort to locate and describe the exurbs of large metropolitan areas in the “Not yet full- United States. It defines exurbs as communities located on the urban fringe that have at least 20 per- cent of their workers commuting to jobs in an urbanized area, exhibit low housing density, and have relatively high population growth. Using demographic and economic data from 1990 to 2005, this fledged suburbs, study reveals that: ■ As of 2000, approximately 10.8 million people live in the exurbs of large metropolitan areas. This represents roughly 6 percent of the population of these large metro areas. These exurban but no longer areas grew more than twice as fast as their respective metropolitan areas overall, by 31 percent in the 1990s alone. The typical exurban census tract has 14 acres of land per home, compared to 0.8 acres per home in the typical tract nationwide. wholly rural, ■ The South and Midwest are more exurbanized than the West and Northeast. Five million peo- ple live in exurban areas of the South, representing 47 percent of total exurban population nation- wide. Midwestern exurbs contain 2.6 million people, about one-fourth of all exurbanites. South exurban areas are Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Maryland have the largest proportions of their residents living in exurbs, while Texas, California, and Ohio have the largest absolute numbers of exurbanites. undergoing rapid ■ Seven metropolitan areas have at least one in five residents living in an exurb. These metro areas include Little Rock (AR), Grand Rapids (MI), and Greenville (SC), as well as areas like Poughkeepsie (NY) that serve as “satellites” to nearby larger metro areas. Both fast-growing and change in popu- slow-growing metropolitan areas have developed exurbs. ■ Nationwide, 245 counties have at least one-fifth of their residents living in exurban areas. lation, land use, The Louisville metro area has the highest number of exurban counties (13), followed by Atlanta, Richmond, and Washington, D.C., which each have 11. These exurban counties grew by 12 per- cent overall between 2000 and 2005, faster than population growth in urban, inner suburban, or outer suburban counties (like Loudoun County, VA). However, outer suburban counties added 4.5 and economic million people in the last five years, exceeding the 1.8 million-person gain in exurban counties. ■ Residents of the “average” exurb are disproportionately white, middle-income, homeowners, function.” and commuters. Yet exurbanites do not conform to all popular stereotypes. For instance, they do not appear to telecommute, work in the real estate industry, or inhabit super-sized homes at higher rates than residents of other metropolitan county types. Middle-income families’ “drive to qualify” for more affordable new homes that are in limited supply elsewhere fuels growth in many metro- politan exurbs. Despite their popularization by political analysts, media, and local growth activists, the “exurbs” do not abound nor fit a single, neat stereotype. Just 6 percent of large metro area residents live in an exurb, and these exurbs vary from affordable housing havens for middle-class families, to “favored quarters” for high-income residents, to the path of least resistance for new development. While they may continue to capture interest among political observers, the real test for exurbia lies in how our nation accommodates future growth. Will exurbs remain exurbs or become the suburbs of tomorrow? October 2006 • The Brookings Institution • Living Cities Census Series 1 Introduction rural in nature, these exurban areas torsky’s 1955 rendering, Fairfield are reportedly undergoing rapid County (CT) and Rockland County eyond the suburbs, at the far change in population, land use, and (NY) housed exurban commuters to edges of metropolitan areas, economic function. New York City. After five decades of communities both new and Notwithstanding what they will continuous metropolitan decentraliza- old are developing the become in future generations, exurbs tion, places like Greenwich (CT) and Bcapacity to house large flows of incom- are important places to understand in New City (NY) are nothing if not con- ing residents. their contemporary form. They lie at ventional New York-area suburbs. Popularized in books like David the forefront of important local Some common threads run through Brooks’ On Paradise Drive, and in debates around growth and develop- popular descriptions of the exurbs. numerous news articles analyzing the ment issues. As such, they help “set They generally lie within the orbit of a aftermath of the 2004 Presidential the table” for future metropolitan big city, but have weaker economic election (Bai 2004; Brooks 2004; growth, and their prevalence may and social ties to the urban core than Brownstein and Rainey 2004), these serve as an important indicator of suburbs, consistent with their more areas have come to be known as emerging social trends or the effective- remote locations. They are more resi- “exurbs.” Exurbs are drawing the ness of various policies to shape met- dential with newer housing stock, and attention of journalists, pundits, poli- ropolitan development. less commercial than suburbs. They cymakers, and sociologists attempting Yet exurbia is hardly a new concept. have population densities that are to understand how Americans live It first gained popular attention when lower, more like their rural neighbors, today and how different community A.C. Spectorsky described its residents and their economies may still depend types matter to politics and policy. In in his 1955 book, The Exurbanites. somewhat on agricultural employ- many exurbs, battles over roads, land, Despite this long history, the concept ment. sewers, schools, quality of life, and of the exurbs is enjoying greater atten- Perhaps most importantly, present- “loss of small town character” are tion now than ever before. The terms day exurbs seem to be defined by fast- reaching a fever pitch. exurbs, exurban, and exurbia appeared paced, low-density growth and But where exactly are the exurbs? in U.S. newspapers twice as many development. If that type of develop- And who lives there? times in 2005 as they did just two ment continues, new housing and In most metropolitan areas, a cen- years ago, and at four times the rate commerce could fill in the space on tral city (or cities) still lies at the core, they did ten years ago.2 the far fringes of metropolitan areas, containing a cluster of jobs and resi- All the talk about exurbs, however, turning them into more “mature” sub- dents. Outside the core lie suburbs, has yielded little methodical informa- urbs and potentially creating new areas that developed somewhat later, tion or consistent definitions regarding exurbs even farther out. More immedi- comprised today of both residential their location and their residents. In ately, however, the development pat- and commercial space. Suburbs are addition, it is unclear what might dis- terns typically identified as “sprawl” the dominant landscape in contempo- tinguish exurbs from the suburbs in intersect closely with those found in rary America, and their speed and which Americans have lived for gener- the exurbs. This paper does not scale of change has reconfigured the ations. Some researchers have tackled attempt to define “sprawl,” nor does it way Americans live (Hayden 2003). By these questions in the academic litera- equate sprawl with exurbia. But the Census Bureau’s definition, about ture. But many recent observers have because public policies designed to 53 percent of the nation’s residents resorted to an “I-know-it-when-I-see- curb (or promote) sprawl in metropoli- live in suburbs.1 Whereas most people it” approach for identifying the exurbs tan areas often affect the exurbs, it is used to work in cities and their imme- and their residents. Many counties, for important to understand more about diate environs, today more than half of instance, may have a more mixed char- where these communities are located, all metropolitan jobs are located at acter and are probably not well- who lives there, and why. least 10 miles from a traditional city described by alternating and Sparked by new popular interest in downtown (Mieszowski and Mills overlapping classifications. the subject, this paper describes an 1993; Berube forthcoming). A lot of journalists, and some aca- effort to “find exurbia,” based on a Exurbs, it is argued, lie somewhere demics, argue that exurbs represent a review of the academic literature and beyond the suburbs. At the urban- path-breaking form of development, analysis of data from Census 2000 and rural periphery, outer suburbs bleed defined in part by the extreme dis- beyond. We begin by examining previ- into small-town communities with an tances from these areas to the metro- ous attempts to identify exurban terri- agricultural heritage. Not yet full- politan core. Yet today’s exurbs may tory and its residents, and discuss the fledged suburbs, but no longer wholly just be tomorrow’s suburbs. In Spec- implications of those inquiries. We 2 October 2006 • The Brookings Institution • Living Cities Census Series then describe a new methodology for bia, Spectorsky’s 1955 book The labeled “exurbs.” Teixeira (2006) fur- identifying exurbs and the assump- Exurbanites, sought to describe not ther investigates the politics of exur- tions that underpin it. Applying that so much these far-flung (at the time) bia using Lang and Sanchez’s methodology, we proceed to describe places, but the people who inhabited classification system. the incidence and characteristics of them. To Spectorsky, these people These studies that attempt to char- exurban places nationwide, in states, were a new breed of commuters, acterize exurbia and exurbanites form and in selected large metropolitan seeking a semi-rural lifestyle to part of an even larger literature areas.
Recommended publications
  • Reos and the Challenges of Neighborhood Stabilization in Suburban Cities
    Shuttered Subdivisions: REOs and the Challenges of Neighborhood Stabilization in Suburban Cities by Carolina K. Reid Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Driving along California’s Interstate 580, Since 1990, subdivisions such as these have the freeway that connects San Francisco to sprung up all over urban America, but nowhere Stockton, the landscape of newly built subdivi- more rapidly than in California, Nevada, and sions is hard to miss. Neat rows of clay-colored Arizona. In Boomburbs: The Rise of America’s roofs, all of which are the same size, the same Accidental Cities, authors Lang and LeFurgy shape, and extend just to the edge of the prop- point out that areas that were once small subdi- erty line, flank both sides of the road. A huge visions with obscure names such as Henderson, sign hanging from the concrete wall that Chandler, and Santa Ana have grown larger encircles one development reads, “If you lived than many better-known cities, including here, you’d be home already,” beckoning new Miami, Providence, St. Louis, and Pittsburgh, buyers with the promise of a three-bedroom and house an ever-increasing share of the home with a two-car garage. At the exit ramp, nation’s urban population. By 2000, nearly 15 there’s a Target, a Home Depot, a few gas million people lived in boomburbs and “baby stations, and a fast food restaurant or two. And boomburbs.”1 That number has likely grown, as a drive-through Starbucks, providing much- new construction fueled by the recent housing needed caffeine to early morning commuters boom has led, in just a few years, to a doubling headed toward the distant labor markets of San of population in communities such as Avondale, Francisco and San Jose.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing in the Evolving American Suburb Cover, from Top: Daybreak, South Jordan, Utah
    Housing in the Evolving American Suburb Cover, from top: Daybreak, South Jordan, Utah. Daybreak, Utah St. Charles, Waldorf, Maryland. St. Charles Companies Inglenook, Carmel, Indiana. Ross Chapin Architects, Land Development & Building Inc. © 2016 by the Urban Land Institute 2001 L Street, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the publisher. Recommended bibliographic listing: Urban Land Institute. Housing in the Evolving American Suburb. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute, 2016. ISBN: 978-0-87420-396-7 Housing in the Evolving American Suburb About the Urban Land Institute The mission of the Urban Land Institute is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ULI is committed to n Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real estate and land use policy to exchange best practices and serve community needs; n Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem solving; n Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regeneration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable development; n Advancing land use policies and design practices that respect the uniqueness of both the built and natural environments; n Sharing knowledge through education, applied research, publishing, and electronic media; and n Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice and advisory efforts that address current and future challenges. Established in 1936, the ULI today has more than 39,000 members worldwide, representing the entire spectrum of the land use and development disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Bordering Faith: Spiritual
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Bordering Faith: spiritual transformation, cultural change, and Chicana/o youth at the border A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Chicana and Chicano Studies by Francisco Javier Fuentes Jr. Committee in charge: Professor Ralph Armbruster-Sandoval, Chair Professor Dolores Inés Casillas Professor Rudy Busto December 2016 The dissertation of Francisco Javier Fuentes Jr. is approved. _____________________________________________ Dolores Inés Casillas _____________________________________________ Rudy Busto _____________________________________________ Ralph Armbruster-Sandoval, Committee Chair December 2016 Bordering Faith: spiritual transformation, cultural change, and Chicana/o youth at the border Copyright © 2016 by Francisco Javier Fuentes Jr. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A work like this is no small feat and there are many people I would like to thank for walking with me on this journey. I owe my first thanks to my Dissertation Committee and all the faculty associated with the Department of Chicana and Chicano Studies, Sociology, and Religious Studies. I cannot express enough thanks to Dr. Ralph Armbruster-Sandoval who served as the chairman of my committee and was the first to provide me unyielding support in a cutting-edge program. I am also truly grateful for Dr. Inés Casillas and Dr. Rudy Busto who continued to make themselves available for feedback, conversations, and encouragement throughout the years. I could not have finished had it not been for their guidance and keen observations. I am also appreciative of Dr. Mario T. Garcia, Dr. Gerardo Aldana, and Dr. Peter J. Garcia who first taught me the power of scholarship as a Chicano. I have the work and instruction of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Boomburbs; Smart Growth at the Fringe?
    Boomburbs; Smart Growth at the Fringe? 4th Annual New Partners for Smart Growth Conference—Miami, FL Robert E. Lang, Ph.D. Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech January 29, 2005 The 54 Boomburbs Arizona: Chandler, Gilbert, Glendale, Mesa, Peoria, Scottsdale, Tempe California: Anaheim, Chula Vista, Corona, Costa Mesa, Daly City, Escondido, Fontana, Fremont, Fullerton, Irvine, Lancaster, Moreno Valley, Oceanside, Ontario, Orange, Oxnard, Palmdale, Rancho Cucamonga, Riverside, San Bernardino, Santa Ana, Santa Clarita, Santa Rosa, Simi Valley, Sunnyvale, Thousand Oaks Colorado: Aurora, Lakewood, Westminster Florida: Coral Springs, Hialeah, Pembroke Pines, Clearwater Nevada: Henderson, North Las Vegas Texas: Arlington, Carrollton, Garland, Grand Prairie, Irving, Mesquite, Plano Other States: Naperville, IL; Salem, OR; West Valley City, UT; Chesapeake, VA; Bellevue, WA The 84 Baby Boomburbs California: Antioch, Apple Valley, Chino, Cupertino, Davis, Fairfield, Folsom, Gardena, Hemet, Hesperia, Laguna Niguel, Livermore, Lynwood, Milpitas, Mission Viejo, Napa, Petaluma, Pittsburg, Pleasanton, Rialto, Roseville, San Marcos, Santa Cruz, South Gate, Tustin, Union, Vacaville, Victorville, Vista, Yorba Linda Colorado: Greeley, Longmont, Thornton Florida: Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, Davie, Deerfield Beach, Del Ray Beach, Lauderhill, Margate, Miramar, North Miami, Plantation, Sunrise, Tamarac Georgia: Marietta, Roswell Illinois: Elgin, Orland Park, Palatine Maryland: Frederick, Gaithersburg Minnesota: Brooklyn Park, Burnesville, Coon Rapids, Eagan,
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside Opolis
    UC Riverside Opolis Title Smart Growth on the Edge: Suburban Planning and Development for the Next 20 Years Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9kv3c563 Journal Opolis, 1(2) ISSN 1551-5869 Author Transcripts, Conference Publication Date 2005-06-30 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Opolis Vol. 1, No. 2, 2005. pp. 47-68 © 2005. All Rights Reserved. Smart Growth on the Edge Suburban Planning and Development for the Next 20 Years Conference Transcripts The Mission Inn Riverside, California January 21, 2005 Hosted by: Edward J. Blakely Center for Sustainable Suburban Development Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech Urban Land Institute Orange County Introduction The principles that underlie “Smart Growth” were born in urban spaces to respond to modern needs. Most of the growth around the world is taking place at the edges of development as greenspace transforms into housing tracts and where older suburbs redefine themselves as the metropolitan edge. In January, the Edward J. Blakely Center for Sustainable Suburban Development, the Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech, and the Orange County District Council of the Urban Land Institute hosted a one-day conference on applying the principles of smart growth to suburbs. Smart Growth on the Edge: Suburban Planning and Development for the Next 20 Years was held in Riverside, California, at the center of the largest edge area in the country. Peter Calthorpe, a principal of Calthorpe Associates, advocated for regional planning and rethinking the designs of arterial transportation systems. Robert Lang, director of the Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech, introduced “Boomburbs,” the fastest-growing suburbs in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Suburbs, Boomburbs and Exurbs : a Multilevel Approach of Contextual Effects and the Production of Suburban Morphologies
    Suburbs, boomburbs and exurbs : a multilevel approach of contextual effects and the production of suburban morphologies. Renaud Le Goix To cite this version: Renaud Le Goix. Suburbs, boomburbs and exurbs : a multilevel approach of contextual effects and the production of suburban morphologies.: Methodological framework and exploratory results in Paris metropolitan region. 5th International Conference of the Research Network Private Urban Governance & Gated Communities (Redefinition of Public Space Within the Privatization of Cities), Mar2009, Santiago-de-Chili, France. hal-00461773 HAL Id: hal-00461773 https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00461773 Submitted on 5 Mar 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. R. Le Goix, 2009, Suburban morphologies and contextual effects. 1/25 5th International Conference Private Urban Governance. Santiago, Chile April 2009. 5th International Conference of the Research Network Private Urban Governance & Gated Communities Redefinition of Public Space Within the Privatization of Cities March 30th to April 2nd 2009, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile Guideline for paper proposals/abstracts Paper proposed for panel 2 - A trans/inter-disciplinary approaches to understanding and exploring private urban spaces and governance in cities Title Boomburbs, suburbs, exurbs : suburban morphologies and contextual effects Keywords Author (s) Renaud Le Goix, Ass.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographies of Inequality,” Is the Latest in a Series of Ahead-Of-The-Curve, Groundbreaking Pieces Published Through Third Way’S NEXT Initiative
    Geographies of Inequality WHAT’S NEXT? San Francisco is now home to 80,000 more dogs than children. In Manhattan, singles make up half of all households. And “super-global Chicago may be better understood in thirds—one-third San Francisco and two-thirds Detroit.” In the ongoing national debate over economic opportunity and rising inequality, one important factor is consistently overlooked—the price of housing in elite urban cores. A new paper for Third Way’s “Next” series, by Joel Kotkin of Chapman University in California, argues that the price of housing “represents a central, if not dominant, factor in the rise of inequality” and that there is tremendous variation in housing costs by region. In parts of the country affected by high- priced housing, it has become so expensive that it acts, according to Kotkin, “as a cap on upward mobility … driving many—particularly young families—to leave high-priced coastal regions for less expensive, usually less regulated markets in the country’s interior.” The result is the making “of two divergent Americas, one that is largely childless and has a small middle class and another that, more like pre-1990 America, still has a large middle class and children.” Big cities, as Kotkin points out, have been losing the middle class— with the result that they are becoming areas of great wealth and entrenched poverty—while the suburbs tend to have less inequality. These trends fly in the face of what Kotkin calls “the Density Delusion” as the solution to housing affordability. But, as Kotkin points out, not only is dense housing more expensive than the much derided “sprawl,” the importance of housing has led to job growth in smaller cities and in the suburbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Reflections on Comparing (Post-)Suburbs in the US and France (Chapter 12)
    Some reflections on comparing (post-)suburbs in theUS and France (Chapter 12) Renaud Le Goix To cite this version: Renaud Le Goix. Some reflections on comparing (post-)suburbs in the US and France (Chapter 12). Harris, R. and Vorms, C. What’s in a Name? Talking about Suburbs, Toronto University Press, pp.320-350, 2017, 978-1442649606. halshs-02297626 HAL Id: halshs-02297626 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02297626 Submitted on 26 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Le Goix, R. (2017) Some reflections on comparing (post-)suburbs in the US and France (Chapter 12), in: R. Harris and C. Vorms (Eds) What's in a Name? Talking about Suburbs, pp. 320-350. Toronto: Toronto University Press. Chapter 12: Some Reflections on Comparing (Post-)Suburbs in the United States and France Renaud Le Goix As discussed in the introduction to this volume, there are generic and specific terms for the places that English speakers routinely call suburbs. Interestingly, the term banlieues à l’américaine has been widely used by planners and residents to describe large master- planned subdivisions built in France after the 1960s; these have a positive connotations associated with their novelty and negative ones associated with a sense of the Americanization of urban landscape (Charmes, 2005; Gasnier, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Road from Babylon to Brentwood: Crisis and Restructuring in the San Francisco Bay Area by Alex
    The Long Road From Babylon To Brentwood: Crisis and Restructuring in the San Francisco Bay Area By Alex B. Schafran A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Teresa P.R. Caldeira, Chair Professor Ananya Roy Professor Malo Hutson Professor Richard Walker Fall 2012 Copyright © Alex B. Schafran All Rights Reserved Abstract The Long Road From Babylon To Brentwood: Crisis and Restructuring in the San Francisco Bay Area by Alex B. Schafran Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Teresa P.R. Caldeira, Chair This dissertation integrates policy analysis, archival research, ethnographic field work, GIS mapping and statistical analysis to build a broad geo‐historical understanding of the role of planning, policy, capital and race in the production of the foreclosure crisis in the San Francisco Bay Area. It begins from the premise that an explanation of the foreclosure crisis that focuses solely on either finance capital or the action of homeowners misses the critical importance of history, geography and planning to the production of crisis. The specific and racialized historical geography of the initial wave of foreclosure in the Bay Area, which like in Southern California is particularly concentrated in newly built suburban and exurban areas which are exceptionally diverse, is evidence of the deeper role of two generations of urban development, regional economics and planning politics in what is too often cast as a ‘housing problem.’ This dissertation argues that thinking about the current problem as an urban crisis forces us to reexamine the dysfunctionality of planning politics at every scale and the reality of a metropolitan geography where hyper‐diverse demographic and economic sprawl and geopolitical fragmentation is a historical fact rather than a pending reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Staying the Same: Urbanization in America by Wendell Cox 04/27/2012
    Staying the Same: Urbanization in America by Wendell Cox 04/27/2012 The recent release of the 2010 US census data on urban areas (Note 1) shows that Americans continue to prefer their lower density lifestyles, with both suburbs and exurbs (Note 2) growing more rapidly than the historic core municipalities. This may appear to be at odds with the recent Census Bureau 2011 metropolitan area population estimates, which were widely mischaracterized as indicating exurban (and suburban) losses and historical core municipality gains. In fact, core counties lost domestic migrants, while suburban and exurban counties gained domestic migrants. The better performance of the core counties was caused by higher rates of international migration, more births in relation to deaths and an economic malaise that has people staying in (counties are the lowest level at which migration data is reported). Nonetheless, the improving environment of core cities in recent decades has been heartening. The urban area data permits analysis of metropolitan area population growth by sector at nearly the smallest census geography (census blocks, which are smaller than census tracts). Overall, the new data indicates that an average urban population density stands at 2,343 per square mile (904 per square kilometer). This is little different from urban density in 1980 and nearly 10 percent above the lowest urban density of 2,141 per square mile (827) recorded in the 1990 census. Thus, in recent decades, formerly falling US urban densities have stabilized . Urban density in 2010, however, remains approximately 27 percent below that of 1950, as many core municipalities lost population while suburban and suburban populations expanded.
    [Show full text]
  • RESHAPING SUBURBS a Report Produced As Part of the EPSRC SOLUTIONS Project - the Sustainability of Land Use and Transport in Outer Neighbourhoods RESHAPING SUBURBS
    RESHAPING SUBURBS A report produced as part of the EPSRC SOLUTIONS project - the sustainability of land use and transport in outer neighbourhoods RESHAPING SUBURBS The cover pictures are of Bradley Stoke, Bristol, and Vauban, Freiburg, Germany. They represent two extremes of car dependence. Around Bradley Stoke the businesses are 95% car dependent, and people living there use the car for 80% of ‘local’ trips. By comparison the residents of Vauban use the car for 10% of trips, and 70% are by foot or bike. The Bristol suburb is designed as a series of single use campus-style development pods, linked by main roads. The Freiburg suburb, on re-used land, is designed as a mixed use low-car, green environment around a public transport spine. The physical differences mesh with the divergent values and lifestyle choices of the inhabitants, reinforcing them, building unhealthy conditions into the very fabric of the town in one case, while facilitating healthy and sustainable behavioural choices in the other. A study tour of Freiburg, funded by the Director of Health South West, was organized as part of the SOLUTIONS local design work. Text: Hugh Barton Research by: Hugh Barton, Marcus Grant, Louis Rice and Michael Horswell Layout: Jamie Roxburgh WHO Collaborating centre for Healthy Urban Environments University of the West of England, Bristol. January 2011 RESHAPING SUBURBS Contents Preface 3 1. Research aims and process 5 Policy context Research aims The research process 2. Local study areas 8 3. The SOLUTIONS household survey 11 4. Neighbourhood design archetypes 13 Pods: use segregated, car-orientated development sites Cells: neighbourhood units Clusters: a group of interlocked neighbourhoods Linear township: linked neighbourhoods along a main street 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Sprawl Designing Urban Resilience for the Twenty-First-Century Resource and Climate Crises
    The Post Carbon Reader Series: Cities, Towns, and Suburbs The Death of Sprawl Designing Urban Resilience for the Twenty-First-Century Resource and Climate Crises By Warren Karlenzig About the Author Warren Karlenzig is president of Common Current. He has developed urban sustainability frameworks, recommendations, and metrics with agencies of all sizes around the world; his clients have included the United Nations, the U.S. Department of State, the White House Office of Science and Technology, the State of California, and the Asian Institute for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability. Warren is the author of How Green Is Your City? The SustainLane US City Rankings (2007) and Blueprint for Greening Affordable Housing (1999). Karlenzig is a Fellow of Post Carbon Institute. This publication is an excerpted chapter from The Post Carbon Institute Post Carbon Reader: Managing the 21st Century’s © 2010 Sustainability Crises, Richard Heinberg and Daniel Lerch, eds. (Healdsburg, CA: Watershed Media, 2010). 613 4th Street, Suite 208 For other book excerpts, permission to reprint, and Santa Rosa, California 95404 USA purchasing visit http://www.postcarbonreader.com. The Death oF Sprawl In April 2009—just when people thought things couldn’t get worse in San Bernardino County, California—bulldozers demolished four perfectly good new houses and a dozen others still under con- struction in Victorville, 100 miles northeast of down- town Los Angeles. The structures’ granite countertops and Jacuzzis had been removed first. Then the walls came down and the remains were unceremoniously scrapped. A woman named Candy Sweet came by the site looking for wood and bartered a six-pack of cold Coronas for some of the splintered two-by-fours.1 Candy Sweet looks for lumber at a newly-demolished house in Victorville.
    [Show full text]