Niswslerrer December 1994 No
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (Sebok) Version 1.3
Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) version 1.3 Released May 30, 2014 Part 2: Systems Please note that this is a PDF extraction of the content from www.sebokwiki.org Copyright and Licensing A compilation copyright to the SEBoK is held by The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology ©2014 (“Stevens”) and copyright to most of the content within the SEBoK is also held by Stevens. Prominently noted throughout the SEBoK are other items of content for which the copyright is held by a third party. These items consist mainly of tables and figures. In each case of third party content, such content is used by Stevens with permission and its use by third parties is limited. Stevens is publishing those portions of the SEBoK to which it holds copyright under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en_US for details about what this license allows. This license does not permit use of third party material but gives rights to the systems engineering community to freely use the remainder of the SEBoK within the terms of the license. Stevens is publishing the SEBoK as a compilation including the third party material under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details about what this license allows. This license will permit very limited noncommercial use of the third party content included within the SEBoK and only as part of the SEBoK compilation. -
JAHRESBERICHT 2012 H
f t a h c s l l e s e G r e t u p m o C e h c s i h c i e r er t s Ö e i D . t f a h c s ll e s e G d n u t f a h c s rt i W n i k i t a m r o f n I .. e l u h c S r JAHRESBERICHT 2012 e d n i k i t a m r o f n ÖSTERREICHISCHE COMPUTER GESELLSCHAFT I . 2012 g n u d l i b r e t i e W d n u - s u A in k ti a rm fo In . .. ng hu sc or d F un aft sch issen Informatik in W Inhalt OCG – DIE IKT-PLATTFORM INTEGRATIVE PROJEKTE 08 Wer ist die OCG und was macht sie? 31 AAL-A Gründungsmitglied 09 Organigramm der OCG-Dienstleistungen 32 ECDL barrierefrei: Der Arbeitskreis Barrierefreiheit durch IKT (AK:BF-IKT) 10 Arbeitskreise der OCG 33 IT4Blind 12 Veranstaltungen der OCG Gemeindebau 3.0 13 Die OCG als Veranstaltungspartner INNOVATION 14 OCG Horizonte – IT-Themen und Trends 34 INNOTRAIN IT 15 OCG Students Club 35 Die IT des Alltags für Kinder erfahrbar machen (ITAKE) 16 Veranstaltungsübersicht 2012 17 Wissenschaftliche Wettbewerbe DER VEREIN 18 Wettbewerbe für Jugendliche 38 Organigramm der OCG 19 Approbation Lernmaterial 40 Die Ehrenmitglieder OCG Schriftenreihe Der Vorstand 42 Mitglieder aus der Wirtschaft LEITTHEMEN 43 Institutionelle Mitglieder AUSBILDUNG UND QUALITÄT 44 Neue Mitglieder aus der Wirtschaft 2012 22 AK IKT-Ausbildung für LehrerInnen Aufstellung der Mitglieder nach Bundesländern 23 Akkreditierung der OCG als Zertifizierungsstelle 45 Die Komitees nach ISO/IEC 27001 47 Ehrungen 24 ECDL und OCG Zertifikate 48 AARIT und ERCIM 26 Sophia – Das erfolgreiche Testsystem der OCG Council of European Professional Informatics Societies (CEPIS) International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) WISSENSCHAFT UND IT 49 Österreichische Gesellschaft für Informatik (ÖGI) 28 Erster Österreichischer Informatiktag Österreichische Gesellschaft für Informatikgeschichte (ÖGIG) Kooperation mit SI und GI 29 IKT-Forscher Netzwerktreffen 30 Energieinformatik Jahresbericht 2012 Informationstechnologie und Informatik Als permanente Aufgabe hat sich das befinden sich nach wie vor in enormer Thema „Ausbildung und Qualität“ he- Weiterentwicklung. -
What Can Architecture Learn from Ecological Systems?
Interweaving Architecture and Ecology – A Theoretical Perspective Or: What can architecture learn from ecological systems? Batel Dinur Abstract This paper is part of an on-going research which attempts to reveal whether an analogy between ecology and architecture can benefit architectural design and if so, then in what ways. The analogy is done through an interpretation of three ecological principles which define the organization of living systems and then attempts to reveal how these three ecological principles may be implemented in architecture. The paper firstly describes the problem at hand and the need for a new model for architecture which may be better informed by the study of ecological systems. It then elaborates on the definition of the three ecological principles (fluctuations, stratification, and interdependence) which were chosen for investigation because they define the organization of living systems and therefore may be relevant as a basis for an analogy between ecology and architecture. The paper then presents brief examples of the current and possible further realization of these ecological principles in architecture. Keywords: ecology, architecture, living systems’ organization, process, fluctuations, stratification, interdependence. Introduction In this paper I will try to illuminate how an ecological understanding of systems may contribute to architectural design. An ‘ecological understanding of systems’ means to understand how the components of a living system function together and make the system what it is. My question is whether a better understanding of these living processes may move architecture away from a perceived obsession with the static object, and into a more dynamic system? My argument is that a truly environmental architecture cannot be reached through the refinement of the static object alone, but must address complex interactions, and that these might be best informed through a study of ecology. -
Information Systems Foundations Theory, Representation and Reality
Information Systems Foundations Theory, Representation and Reality Information Systems Foundations Theory, Representation and Reality Dennis N. Hart and Shirley D. Gregor (Editors) Workshop Chair Shirley D. Gregor ANU Program Chairs Dennis N. Hart ANU Shirley D. Gregor ANU Program Committee Bob Colomb University of Queensland Walter Fernandez ANU Steven Fraser ANU Sigi Goode ANU Peter Green University of Queensland Robert Johnston University of Melbourne Sumit Lodhia ANU Mike Metcalfe University of South Australia Graham Pervan Curtin University of Technology Michael Rosemann Queensland University of Technology Graeme Shanks University of Melbourne Tim Turner Australian Defence Force Academy Leoni Warne Defence Science and Technology Organisation David Wilson University of Technology, Sydney Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/info_systems02_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Information systems foundations : theory, representation and reality Bibliography. ISBN 9781921313134 (pbk.) ISBN 9781921313141 (online) 1. Management information systems–Congresses. 2. Information resources management–Congresses. 658.4038 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Brendon McKinley with logo by Michael Gregor Authors’ photographs on back cover: ANU Photography Printed by University Printing Services, ANU This edition © 2007 ANU E Press Table of Contents Preface vii The Papers ix Theory Designing for Mutability in Information Systems Artifacts, Shirley Gregor and Juhani Iivari 3 The Eect of the Application Domain in IS Problem Solving: A Theoretical Analysis, Iris Vessey 25 Towards a Unied Theory of Fit: Task, Technology and Individual, Michael J. -
What Is Systems Theory?
What is Systems Theory? Systems theory is an interdisciplinary theory about the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science, and is a framework by which one can investigate and/or describe any group of objects that work together to produce some result. This could be a single organism, any organization or society, or any electro-mechanical or informational artifact. As a technical and general academic area of study it predominantly refers to the science of systems that resulted from Bertalanffy's General System Theory (GST), among others, in initiating what became a project of systems research and practice. Systems theoretical approaches were later appropriated in other fields, such as in the structural functionalist sociology of Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann . Contents - 1 Overview - 2 History - 3 Developments in system theories - 3.1 General systems research and systems inquiry - 3.2 Cybernetics - 3.3 Complex adaptive systems - 4 Applications of system theories - 4.1 Living systems theory - 4.2 Organizational theory - 4.3 Software and computing - 4.4 Sociology and Sociocybernetics - 4.5 System dynamics - 4.6 Systems engineering - 4.7 Systems psychology - 5 See also - 6 References - 7 Further reading - 8 External links - 9 Organisations // Overview 1 / 20 What is Systems Theory? Margaret Mead was an influential figure in systems theory. Contemporary ideas from systems theory have grown with diversified areas, exemplified by the work of Béla H. Bánáthy, ecological systems with Howard T. Odum, Eugene Odum and Fritj of Capra , organizational theory and management with individuals such as Peter Senge , interdisciplinary study with areas like Human Resource Development from the work of Richard A. -
First Responders in Regional Disasters a Social Responsibility
FIRST RESPONDERS IN REGIONAL DISASTERS A SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Gerhard Chroust, J.Kepler Univ., Linz, Austria ([email protected]) Günther Ossimitz, Alpen-Adria University Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria Markus Roth, Creative Bits, Traun, Austria Nadine Sturm, Research Institute of the Red Cross Austria, Wien, Austria Peter Ziehesberger, Ziehesberger Elektronik, Neuhofen/Krems, Austria ABSTRACT Today’s catastrophes (many of them man-made or at least triggered by human acti- vity) seemingly endanger an increasing number of humans in large geographic areas in numerous different ways, calling for more attention concerning appropriate reactions. We discuss what constitutes a ’disaster’ and analyze different response types (Flight/Run away, Fight/Intervene, Freeze, Submit/Sustain/Endure, Ignore/Deny). Taking a closer look at in- terventions as the classical Fight/Intervene reaction, we investigate interventions from se- veral view points: systemic (bringing a system back to its domain of viability), process- oriented (characterizing an intervention as a set interlinked process steps), organizational (identifying systemic strategies and tactics), and human (considering Social Responsibility, psychological problems, mental health, and multicultural aspects). We will also identify the role that modern Information and Communication Technology (ICT) can play in supporting First Responders by making their job easier and at the same time more effective. Keywords: Social Responsibility, First Responders, Disasters, Intervention, Systems view, Or- ganisation, Mental Health, Human Aspects 1 MOTIVATION Regional disasters (many of them man-made or at least triggered by human activities) seemingly have grown in number, in scale, in their impact and also in their publicity due to media cover- age. Disasters endanger people, society, environment, infrastructure, and economy in complex, multi-facetted, and interrelated ways. -
What IS Systems Science?
What is Systems Science? Systems Science constitutes a somewhat fuzzily defined academic domain, that touches virtually all traditional disciplines, from mathematics, technology and biology to philosophy and the social sciences. It is more specifically related to the recently developing "sciences of complexity", including AI, neural networks, dynamical systems, chaos, and complex adaptive systems. Systems science argues that however complex or diverse the world that we experience, we will always find different types of organization in it, and such organization can be described by concepts and principles which are independent from the specific domain at which we are looking. Hence, if we would uncover those general laws, we would be able to analyze and solve problems in any domain, pertaining to any type of system. The systems approach distinguishes itself from the more traditional analytic approach by emphasizing the interactions and connectedness of the different components of a system. Although the systems approach in principle considers all types of systems, it in practices focuses on the more complex, adaptive, self-regulating systems which we might call "cybernetic". Many of the concepts used by system scientists come from the closely related approach of cybernetics: information, control, feedback, communication... In its present incarnation of "second- order cybernetics", its emphasis is on how observers construct models of the systems with which they interact*. Systems theory studies organization independent of the substrate in which it is embodied and is focused on the structure of systems and their models. ... from Principia Cybernetica Web http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ * This interaction demands the study of uncertainty, complexity, knowledge discovery, informatioin, decision making, formal concept analysis, dynamics and evolution. -
About the Contributors
About the Contributors Enis Afgan is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of Computer and Information Sciences at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, under the supervision of Dr. Purushotham Bangalore. His research interests focus around Grid Computing with the emphasis on user-level scheduling in heterogeneous environments with economic aspects. His other interests include distributed computing, optimization methods, and performance modeling. He received his BS degree in computer science from the University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2003. Syed Muhammad Ahsan is an associate professor at the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan, where he is involved in teaching and research for the last 14 years and has supervised more than 20 MS dissertations. He is doing his PhD in Bioinformatics at U.E.T., Lahore under the supervision of Dr. Abad Ali Shah. He has a bachelor in engineering and a masters in computer science, both form U.E.T., Lahore. Syed Ahsan has more then 15 journal and international research papers to his credit, including this book chapter. He has also refereed five international research papers and has chaired a technical session at IKE, 07, USA. His research interests include Bioinformatics, Semantic Web, Data Provenance and Agile methodologies. He is also the coprincipal investigator for Bioinformatics Resource Facility at U.E.T., Lahore, Pakistan. Krishnakumar Balasubramanian is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Software Integrated Systems at Vanderbilt University. His research interests include distributed, real-time, and embedded systems; model-driven engineering; the application of MDE to deploy and configure component middleware for DRE systems, and patterns and frameworks for DRE systems development. -
Living Cognitive Society: Adigital'world of Views
Living Cognitive Society: a `digital' World of Views Viktoras Veitas [email protected] David Weinbaum (Weaver) [email protected] July 3, 2018 Abstract The current social reality is characterized by all-encompassing change, which disrupts existing social structures at all levels. Yet the prevailing view of society is based on the ontological primacy of stable hierarchical structures, which is no longer adequate. We propose a conceptual framework for thinking about a dynami- cally changing social system: the Living Cognitive Society. Importantly, we show how it follows from a much broader philosophical framework, guided by the theory of individuation, which emphasizes the importance of relationships and interactive processes in the evolution of a system. The framework addresses society as a living cognitive system { an ecology of interacting social subsystems { each of which is also a living cognitive system. We argue that this approach can help us to conceive sustainable social systems that will thrive in the circumstances of accel- erating change. The Living Cognitive Society is explained in terms of its fluid structure, dynamics and the mechanisms at work. We then discuss the disruptive effects of Information and Communication Technologies on the mechanisms at work. We conclude by delineating a major topic for future research { dis- tributed social governance { which focuses on processes of coordination rather than on stable structures within global society. Keywords: cognitive system, living society, information and communica- tion technologies, future social governance, individuation, cognitive develop- arXiv:1602.08388v1 [cs.CY] 26 Oct 2015 ment. 1 Introduction Today's society and life in general are characterized by all-encompassing fast change and movement. -
Nlewslerrcr July 1995 No.37 2Toocopies
NlewsLErrcR July 1995 No.37 2Toocopies Editor-in-Chief: Gerhard Chroust c/o Systemtechnik und Automation, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 LinlAustria, e-mai I : CH ROU ST @ S EA. IJN I -Ll NZ.AC.AT, Tel :+43-7 32-2468-865, Fax:+43-732-2468-878 Dear fo:aders! Again I fiaoe to apobgize for a [etay in tfik fuftus[ettet I fiaae 6een interciae{y irno[tte[ in 6otfi tfu Conference an[ tfuEuropean'ESlPltl yrojut (see bsi[e) . I ang[a[ to report tfrat part of tfu tast grQus[etter (fu.36) uas snrcessfu[[y pinte[ in tfu '[1SA an[ [istributel frotn tfure. It saoes manE an[ sfiouf[ ena6[e a prompter le[iaery of tfu fousbtter to our or)erseas members. eart of tfu leky of tfu fiQustetter b a[so fiu to tfie aery sbw subntission oJ topics suitab[e for 'fiQu Trends', Iftis issue's 'furu'Trenls' are conceraed tuitfi a aery interuting EUROCAST on the Rocks proS[em in autonomous ro1otics. Wfun I started tfu '9@u From left to right: Trends' afumn I fiopel to preseflt a ztieu of ruear& Prof. Sato, Japan, Prof. Pichler, Austria, Prof. [irectioru tfiat is as 6roal as possi6k. Anforatnatety I fiaae Takahara, Japan, Prof. Candela-Sola, Spain. rut rueioel many suitaS[e submissbtu. Q[ease re-meru\er trtat EUROCAST'gs. I am ahtays boftng for interatitrg antri|utiors fo, 'fuu trends'. Is your subjut nat wortfiy to 6e presentel? sth lnt. Workshop on Computer Aided I uou[d ogoin remind you tfiat tfu nQusb*er (an[ some Systems Technology (CAST) otfur interating pieus oJ infornation are aaaikSfe ofl May 22-25, 1 995, lnnsbruck, Austria IFSKI 'WW,l-pagu,'Lfu outss is aia tfu A\L @niform fosource Locator) The Fifth lnternational Conference on Computer place the fittp : / / unwtt.s e a. -
Regional Disasters and Systemic Reactions
REGIONAL DISASTERS AND SYSTEMIC REACTIONS Gerhard Chroust Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 Linz, Austria ([email protected]) Nadine Sturm Research Institute of the Red Cross Austria, 1030 Wien, Austria ([email protected]) Markus Roth Creative Bits, 4050 Traun, Austria ([email protected]) Peter Ziehesberger Ziehesberger Elektronik, 4501 Neuhofen/Krems ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Today’s catastrophes (many of them man-made or at least triggered by human activity) seemingly endanger an increasing number of humans and a spreading portion of land in numerous different ways, calling for more attention concerning appropriate reactions. We will discuss the basic question of what constitutes a ’disaster’. Consequently various alternatives are considered as to reacting in view of a "disaster" (Flight/run away, Fight/intervene, Freeze, Submit/sustain/endure, Ignore/deny). Taking a closer look at interventions as the classical reaction, we distinguish between different points of view: systemic (a system leaving its domain of dependability), process-oriented (a system of interlinked process steps), human (communication, psychology, and mental health of intervention personell and victims), and multicultural (problems of communication, trust, and habits). Keywords: Intervention, catastrophe, dependability, First Responders, process view, Mental Health MOTIVATION It seems that regional emergencies and disasters (many of them man-made or at least triggered by human activities) have grown in number, in scale and also in their media coverage. Especially the last factor increases the awareness and the fear of such disasters. Disasters endanger people, society, environment, infrastructure, and economy in complex, multi-facetted, and interrelated ways. Typical examples are the volcanic eruption of Eyjafjallajökull (Iceland 2010) suddenly interrupting air traffic and thus impacting economy, the local break-down of electric transmission lines due to a tsunami (Fukushima, Japan, 2011) endangering the cooling and thus the safety of an atomic plant. -
The Cybernetics Thought Collective: Machine- Generated Data Using Computational Methods
Anderson BG 2020 The Cybernetics Thought Collective: Machine- Generated Data Using Computational Methods. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 6: 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.19 DATA PAPER The Cybernetics Thought Collective: Machine-Generated Data Using Computational Methods Bethany G. Anderson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, US [email protected] This dataset comprises machine-generated data from the research records and personal archives of four founding members of the transdisciplinary field of cybernetics—W. Ross Ashby, Warren S. McCulloch, Heinz von Foerster, and Norbert Wiener. These archives (or, fonds) are held by the British Library, the American Philosophical Society, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and MIT, respectively. The data were created for “The Cybernetics Thought Collective: A History of Science and Technology Portal Project” (2017–2019), a pilot project funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). Using computational methods and tools—machine learning, named entity recognition, and natural language pro- cessing—on digitized archival records, the data were generated to enhance archival access in three dis- tinct but interrelated ways: as archival metadata for the digitized records, as reusable data to facilitate digital scholarly analyses, and as the basis for a series of test visualizations. The data represent entities associated with cybernetic concepts and the main actors attached to the cybernetics movement and the exchange of its ideas. The dataset is stored along with the digitized records in the University of Illinois (U of I) Library’s multi-tiered repository, a replicated preservation service based on PREMIS (Preserva- tion Metadata: Implementation Strategies). Reuse potential for this dataset includes historical/archival, linguistic, and artistic analyses of the data to examine connections between the cybernetic entities.