ANNUAL REVIEW 2018/19
Because evidence matters A MESSAGE FROM OUR DIRECTOR
“We held the first ever Evidence Week in the UK parliament, opened by community groups from across the country. They joined researchers to brief members of parliament on the evidence relevant to planned policy changes.”
EVIDENCE MATTERS, AND WE SHOULD ASK FOR IT, MAKE SENSE OF IT AND EXPECT DECISION MAKERS TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR IT.
Evidence, in the form of research results, statistics parliaments now want to take this on and we and reasoning, is not some esoteric concern. It is will be working with them over the next year the currency of public life and accountability. to make that happen. We have seen similar international demand for our Transparency Sense about Science’s purpose is to promote of Evidence framework, which pushes government the public interest in sound science and evidence. departments to make available the evidence These are demanding times — equipping behind government proposals. communities, encouraging researchers and pushing bodies that would rather ignore Our Voice of Young Science network — early the evidence to engage with it — and in the career researchers who want to train themselves 12-month round up that follows you will see and help each other to participate in public just how much its realisation depends on the discussion about research — has appeared involvement of different communities and research in new cities around Europe. The Maddox prize, partners, donors and people with a sense of public which we award with Nature in the autumn, service. With their commitment, systems and now includes an early career award. practices in important institutions are changing. We have long argued that national statistics Our AllTrials campaign, supported by tens are public goods. And while governments around of thousands of patients and doctors the world announce data strategies, we have been internationally, is now identifying specific asking: where is the effort to make sure the quality companies and universities whose clinical trial matches the claims? How accountable are results are missing, and the rule changes we have decisions based on data science? secured in Europe and North America have seen To each and every one of you who has given us the the numbers of reported trials rising rapidly. insight, time, funds, expertise and energy necessary We held the first ever Evidence Week in the UK to make such an impact in 12 months, thank you. parliament, opened by community groups from across the country. They joined researchers to brief members of parliament on the evidence Tracey Brown OBE relevant to planned policy changes. Other Director, Sense about Science ALGORITHMS IN EVIDENCE AND THE EU DECISION MAKING CO-CREATING A CITIZEN AND RESEARCHER LED MANDATE FOR MEPS. REPORT RELEASED BY HOUSE OF COMMONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE.
Concerns about post-truth thinking are particularly acute in the EU setting, where the relationships between policymakers, researchers, politicians and the public are relatively new and fragile. To set a more compelling and unified agenda, researchers APRIL / MAY and citizens need to find common purpose in pressing decision makers to improve their use of evidence, and for representatives in the European Parliament to scrutinise evidence effectively. The case for this inquiry was put to the committee Our Evidence Matters project is bringing together by our policy manager Dr Stephanie Mathisen, citizens and researchers to co-create a mandate who raised the question of “the extent to which — a set of expectations — for what they want MEPs algorithms can exacerbate or reduce biases” as well to do with evidence when making and shaping as “the need for decisions made by algorithms to be policy. This initiative was launched following our challenged, understood and regulated”. Her call for event in European Parliament in 2017 led by 100 investigation into this area was timely; since the citizens from different walks of life. launch of the inquiry, we have witnessed growing public concern about the lack of standards in data In 2018-19 we launched the project, first by securing science and use of algorithms. The report’s findings partners. Early 2019 saw a series of flagship offer a fascinating insight into this area, which workshops hosted by our leading partners Science clearly demands further scrutiny. To read it please Foundation Ireland and Luxembourg’s National visit www.parliament.uk where you can download Research Fund, with smaller workshops planned the PDF. across the EU in the future. FIRST EVER ‘EVIDENCE WEEK’
EXPLORING EVIDENCE IN POLICYMAKING IN UK PARLIAMENT.
“I believe that statistics and other evidence tell us how the world is working — or not — and therefore enable us,
as engineers, as politicians, Photographs by James Hopkirk as scientists, as lobbyists, as campaigners: they enable us to make the world work better.”
Chi Onwurah, MP for Newcastle upon Tyne Central & Shadow Minister for Industrial Strategy
JUNE
From 25 - 28 June 2018, MPs joined with exhibits and acted as a hosting point for MPs to meet communities and researchers to explore their constituents. how to use scientific evidence and statistics Community groups came from all over the UK to open to support effective scrutiny and policy. Evidence Week for assembled MPs in the Churchill The first of its kind, Evidence Week was an Room. Their interests ranged from beekeeping to initiative of Sense about Science, the House community action to IVF and they made clear their of Commons Library, Parliamentary Office expectations that Parliament should engage with of Science and Technology and Commons evidence. They were met by more than 40 MPs Science and Technology Committee, and held and peers. Norman Lamb, chair of the Commons in partnership with SAGE Publishing. Science and Technology Committee (pictured Evidence Week offered events and briefings opposite), listened to every single statement. for MPs, produced in collaboration with community Evidence Week ended with a roundtable about organisations, research and regulatory bodies. whether research is looking at what society needs Throughout the week, a custom-made stand to know, which SAGE published as a discussion in the Upper Waiting Hall featured interactive paper later in the year. Norman Lamb greeting community groups at Evidence Week EUROSCIENCE OPEN FORUM 2018
TAKING PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, BIG DATA CHALLENGES, ALLTRIALS, AND POLICY AND EVIDENCE TO EUROPE’S LARGEST INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE MEETING.
JULY / AUGUST
At ESOF 2018 we led discussions on science Our director set out the urgent need for a public guide to data communication; public engagement in research; science, which saw welcome offers of help from the International the AllTrials campaign for clinical trial transparency; Network of Government Science Advisers (INGSA) and Elsevier. big data and the future of democracy; and scientists’ We also led a brainstorming session with early career roles in a ‘post-trust world’. researchers (ECRs) about the challenges they face when We hosted a lively session for early career it comes to getting involved in public discussions about science researchers on how to get their voices heard and evidence. At this session, the ECRs shared their experiences in EU policy discussions with a panel of experts of trying to engage with policymakers both at a national from leading European research organisations, the and EU level; they told us there is a huge need for more support EC’s Joint Research Centre, the EU’s Science Advice to engage with national and EU policymakers, with only a few Mechanism and the Voice of Young Science network. universities and research councils provide training opportunities. ALLTRIALS CAMPAIGN HIGHLIGHTS NON-COMPLIANCE
EU TRIALS TRACKER SHOWS ALMOST HALF OF CLINICAL TRIALS FAILING TO REPORT RESULTS.
“This problem strikes to the heart of evidence based medicine. We cannot make 49% OF EUROPEAN informed choices about CLINICAL TRIALS which treatments work best, IN EUROPE FAIL TO as doctors and patients, REPORT RESULTS 12 unless all results are reported.” MONTHS AFTER THE END OF THE TRIAL Dr Ben Goldacre
SEPTEMBER 2018
SEPTEMBER
It has been another strong year for AllTrials, six months they would be called before the our campaign to get the results of all clinical Committee. In summer 2019, AllTrials will advise trials reported. the Committee on which institutes to call in for non- compliance. In parallel, we produced a step by step EU rules now mandate that all trials on the EU’s guide for researchers and research organisations register of clinical trials must report results onto on how to upload results and update information the register within a year of their end. The EU on clinical trial register entries. These were shared TrialsTracker, launched by the campaign in with every UK university and NHS Trust. September 2018, shows which have reported and which have not. At its launch around half The UK Government is committed to developing of EU trials had not reported results (49%). a wide-ranging strategy on clinical trials European academic institutes are lagging far transparency in the UK and asked the Health behind companies in complying with the rules Research Authority (HRA) to develop this; AllTrials — with 68% of company-sponsored trials reporting co-founder Dr Síle Lane has been invited to join results, but only 11% of academic trials (as of the group writing this new strategy. September 2018). The EUTrialsTracker is being Big news in the USA this year also: in October used by groups around Europe, including student 2018 the FDA, in response to pressure from associations and pharma company shareholders, AllTrials and others, published for consultation to press institutes and companies to clean its plan to identify and punish the organisations up their past trials reporting records. and people who have broken the law by not In the UK, the AllTrials team worked with the reporting clinical trial results. The law saying House of Commons Science and Technology results for clinical trials should be reported within Committee to put UK universities and hospital a year of the end of the trial has existed since researchers on notice that if they didn’t improve 2007 but the FDA has never enforced its power their reporting of clinical trial results within to fine law breakers. VOICE OF YOUNG SCIENCE (VoYS)
POPULAR ‘STANDING UP FOR SCIENCE’ WORKSHOPS EXPAND TO INCLUDE DEDICATED POLICY SESSIONS.
“I thoroughly enjoyed the workshop... I now feel empowered to start my public engagement journey.”
Liam Stubbington, NHS clinical trainee
360+ EARLY CAREER RESEARCHERS ATTENDED VOYS WORKSHOPS IN BRUSSELS, BARCELONA, DUBLIN, EDINBURGH, LONDON, MANCHESTER AND WARWICK THIS YEAR
OCTOBER
The Voice of Young Science (VoYS) is a network deal with a lack of good evidence, and how to get of 3,500+ early career researchers (ECRs) in STEM involved in bringing evidence to policy. and social sciences in the UK and Europe who We also continued to offer our peer review are committed to playing an active role in public workshops in London and Glasgow, supported discussions about science and evidence. by our Peer Review: the Nuts and Bolts guide. We hold Standing up for Science workshops each Our format, involving open and honest discussion year, where ECRs learn how to engage with the with a diverse panel including an academic public and the media, and get their voices heard. editor, a peer review or publishing specialist They hear from well-known researchers who have and a peer reviewer, is effective at illuminating extensive experience of being in the public eye, the “black box” of peer review from different respected science journalists, and policy and public angles. The workshops have proven to be very affairs experts. Attendees leave motivated, inspired successful in equipping researchers with the tools and empowered as academic citizens to improve to confidently involve themselves in peer review, the way science is discussed in public life. whether as a reviewer or author. Attendees report that they leave the workshops feeling empowered This year we expanded the workshop programme with the knowledge and confidence to actively to include a dedicated policy component engage in discussions about research quality focused on how evidence is used in policy, how and how it is served by the peer review process. policymakers balance facts and values, how they JOHN MADDOX PRIZE FOR STANDING UP FOR SCIENCE
PROFESSOR TERRY HUGHES AND FORMER NATUROPATH BRITT HERMES ARE 2018 WINNERS.
THIS YEAR THERE WERE 136 NOMINATIONS FROM 36 COUNTRIES
“It is a privilege to receive this prize and to express my gratitude – not just for me, but more importantly for future generations, who have the most to lose if we fail to act on anthropogenic climate change.”
Professor Terry Hughes
NOVEMBER
The John Maddox Prize recognises the work face of efforts to discredit his research, personal of individuals who promote science and evidence, criticism and smears in the media, Terry redoubled advancing the public discussion around difficult his efforts to communicate with the widest possible topics despite challenges or hostility. Sir John audience, using diverse means and reaching Maddox, whose name this prize commemorates, mainstream media around the world. was a passionate and tireless champion Britt Hermes, a former naturopath, was awarded and defender of science, engaging with difficult the inaugural John Maddox prize for an early career debates and inspiring others to do the same. researcher in recognition of her advocacy and Professor Terry Hughes, who exposed the extent writing on evidence-based medicine – in particular of coral reef damage caused by rising water her exposure of false claims made by proponents temperatures, and Britt Hermes, who publicised of naturopathy, which she has highlighted as her research and subsequent rejection of her both dangerous and ineffective. The judges practice in natural therapies, have each been were particularly impressed by her willingness awarded the 2018 John Maddox Prize for their to question her own views, the discomfort involved courage in promoting science and evidence in communicating about the practices of former on matters of public interest, despite smears, colleagues, and her continued commitment threats and attempted lawsuits. in the face of lawsuits and personal harassment. She is currently being sued for defamation by an Terry Hughes, director of the ARC Centre American naturopath in a case due to be heard of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and a world in a German court. leading expert on the Great Barrier Reef, was recognised for his tireless and courageous efforts The John Maddox Prize, now in its seventh year, is a in communicating research evidence on coral joint initiative of the charity Sense about Science reef bleaching to the public and for tackling the and the leading international scientific journal misrepresentation of coral reef science. In doing so, Nature, and is awarded to one or two people a year. he has experienced hostility from politicians, public Our special thanks to the Wellcome Collection figures and the Australian tourist industry. In the for hosting the awards ceremony this year. EVIDENCE MATTERS IN THE OIREACHTAS
PEOPLE FROM AROUND IRELAND TELL PARLIAMENTARIANS WHY EVIDENCE MATTERS TO THEM.
40 PARLIAMENTARIANS ATTENDED THIS EVENT
“I am delighted to invite Sense about Science and Science Foundation Ireland to bring real life stories to the Houses of the Oireachtas, to shine a light on the importance of evidence- based policy making.”
John Halligan, Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise and Innovation
NOVEMBER / DECEMBER
On 14 November 2018, Sense about Science Fiona O’Loughlin, TD and chair of the Education and Science Foundation Ireland brought 16 people and Skills committee, responded, speaking about to the Houses of the Oireachtas to talk about the importance of evidence to committees when why evidence matters to them and why they making decisions. Pat Buckley TD echoed this expect it to matter to their elected officials. 40 in his comments. parliamentarians attended the event, listening and Dr Síle Lane, our head of international campaigns responding to the citizen’s stories. The speakers and policy, said: “The people who came to the Dáil came from all walks of life and represented a range on November 14th challenged the caricature that of issues: teenager Alison Duggan from Co Cork the public is uninterested in the soundness of policy. spoke passionately about the need for evidence- They have different opinions, they don’t agree on based legislation to combat climate change while what evidence to prioritise and others would no doubt Sean McVeigh, a hurler from Co Donegal, spoke disagree with them. But in uniting over its importance about the evidence for the role Gaelic Athletic to understanding, accountability and scrutiny, we hope Association (GAA) plays in promoting physical they’ll inspire TDs to strike for better in public life.” and mental health in local communities. EVIDENCE HUNTERS LAUNCH
AN ACTIVITY PACK THAT EMPOWERS KIDS TO ASK “WHERE’S THE EVIDENCE FOR THAT?” — DESIGNED FOR SCOUTS, GUIDES AND AFTER-SCHOOL GROUPS. “It’s really important for children to learn how to assess information carefully... We assume that our scouts are making rational decisions and it was eye-opening to realise how uncritical they can be of media sources. This exercise has got them starting to think about how they might be misled if they don’t think carefully about motivation and evidence.”
Celia Wenban-Smith, Scout Leader, Fifth Camberwell Scout Group
WE WILL REACH 210,000+ YOUNG PEOPLE BY JANUARY SUMMER 2019
Following the success of our Ask for Evidence lesson plan which encourages critical thinking among teens, we looked at how we could empower more young people to think critically about claims they see online and in the media. We decided to develop a resource pack aimed at Key Stage 3 - 4 children What’s next? for use in informal educational spaces such as scout groups and after school clubs. Our Evidence Hunter The activity pack is endorsed by CREST, activity pack was developed over several months an enrichment programme run by the British in collaboration with young people around the UK. Science Association. We’ll be working on It was launched in January 2019 at the Association securing more endorsements over the next for Science Education national conference which year, as well as sharing the pack more widely brought together 3,500 delegates from schools with the help of our fantastic partners (like and youth organisations throughout the UK. the Scouts) who helped us to create the guide. In the first week, the activity pack reached an This will reach over 210,000 young people estimated 220,000+ people on social media, by summer 2019 through a range of formal and was shared by high profile journalists and informal learning settings and networks and science influencers with 500,000+ followers. in the UK. We’ll continue to create shareable The launch was covered in The Educator magazine, content to facilitate peer to peer learning which has a readership of 38,000 headteachers among young people and on social media. and teachers. There were more than 2,000 visits We’ll also be working with partners and our to the full Evidence Hunter pack on our website young advisors to refresh the content on a in launch week. regular basis to make sure it stays relevant. ASK FOR EVIDENCE AMBASSADORS
RECRUITING 20 NEW VOLUNTEER AMBASSADORS AROUND THE UK.
“We are surrounded by new, contradictory information, constantly... In order to navigate this world full of information we need to be able to question the evidence behind the headlines.” OUR 10 PREVIOUS Beatriz Goulao, Ask for Evidence ambassador, 2015 cohort AMBASSADORS REACHED 50,000+ PEOPLE
FEBRUARY
Thanks to funding from the Wellcome Trust, taking up their role, they receive expert training this year we recruited 20 new volunteers from in public speaking, insights into campaigning around the UK to join our Ask for Evidence and communications and opportunities ambassadors programme. Ask for Evidence to organise and give practice talks. is a public campaign that holds powerful Our ten existing ambassadors have already figures, companies, organisations and public reached over 50,000 people and over 1500 bodies to account. The campaign helps people people have asked for evidence on issues challenge claims in news stories, adverts and ranging from health supplements, speed limits, policies and ask for the evidence behind them. contraception and education to alcohol, IVF It’s making sure a discussion on the evidence and pollution. happens when it really matters. Our latest recruitment drive will build on this Ask for Evidence ambassadors reach out to success with ambassadors from across the people in their region by giving talks, running country, and different walks of life, highlighting activities and talking with community groups and sharing why evidence matters to them. about issues that matter to them. Before PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PARTNERSHIPS
LAUNCH OF ANIMATION ON SIDE EFFECTS — JUST ONE OF MANY COLLABORATIONS WITH RESEARCHERS THIS YEAR.
Involve the public. And involve them early.
MARCH
Sense about Science has been helping the public Highlights from this year include: to make sense of evidence and take part in scientific debates for 17 years now. We prioritise • Presenting our approach to researchers from institutions across the UK projects that we feel are in the public interest, and EU drawing on ‘Public engagement: A practical guide’, which we wrote particularly those that are complex and sensitive. with funding from the National Institute for Health Research. Our ethos is public led, expert fed — which means • Partnering with the MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science at the University engaging with people early and directly addressing of Liverpool to co-create with members of the public a shareable animation their questions and concerns. about drug side effects. • In collaboration with the Natural Environment Research Council and the British Geological Survey, running user-testing workshops with public and professional groups to develop an online open data source about the world-leading UK Geoenergy Observatories in Cardiff, Cheshire and Glasgow. The observatories will form a ‘macroscope of the earth’, enabling us all to know more about the world beneath our feet and make evidence-informed decisions about the natural environment. SUPPORTERS
WE RECEIVED DONATIONS TOWARDS OUR AIM OF CHALLENGING THE MISREPRESENTATION OF SCIENCE AND EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC LIFE FROM 366 INDIVIDUALS TOTALLING £100,099 AND FROM THE FOLLOWING ORGANISATIONS: BRITISH PHAMACOLOGICAL SOCIETY (£2001-5000); INSITUTE OF PHYSICS ENGINEERING AND MEDICINE (£100-1000) AND ALAN DAVIDSON FOUNDATION (£5,001-10,000).
Ask for evidence teenagers grant * Ask for Evidence: critical thinking for 13-16 year olds £30,001-40,000 Association of Clinical Biochemistry Quality and peer review programme £100-1000 and Laboratory Medicine Babraham Institute Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £1001-2000 for early career researchers Biochemical Society Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £2001-5000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters; and Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshops and campaigns for early career researchers Birmingham City University Voice of Young Science: Standing up for science workshops £2001-5000 and campaigns for early career researchers British Council Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £100-1000 for early career researchers British Geological Survey Embedding public engagement workshops £5001-10,000 British Pharmacological Society Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £1001-2000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters; Alltrials campaign: for clinical trials to be registered and their results reported Cambridge University Press Quality and peer review programme £2001-5000 European Liquid Biopsies Academy Public engagement workshop £100-1000 Elsevier Understanding quality in research (peer review and public £50,001- understanding of data science) £100,000 Ernest Solvay Fund Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £2,001-5,000 for early career researchers F1000 Research Quality and peer review programme £2,001-5,000 Freie Universitat Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £100-1000 for early career researchers Health Research Authority Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £1001-2000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters Institut de Bioenginyeria Catalunya Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £100-1000 for early career researchers Institute of Physics Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £2001-5000 for early career researchers International Society Making sense of forensic genetics: Spanish and Italian editions £10,001-£20,000 for Forensic Genetics IOP Ireland Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £100-1000 for early career researchers IPEM Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £1001-2000 for early career researchers John Innes Foundation Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £2001-5000 for early career researchers Luxembourg National Evidence Matters EU: citizen and researcher co-created mandate £5001-10,000 Research Fund for evidence hunting MEPs; Public engagement workshop Marie Curie Alumni Association Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £2001-5000 for early career researchers Medical Research Council Quality and peer review programme and Voice of Young Science: Standing £5001-10,000 up for Science workshops and campaigns for early career researchers NERC Public engagement workshops and advice on UK Geoenergy Observatories £60,001-70,000 NESTA Benchmarking government's transparency about the use of evidence £2001-5000 NIHR Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £2001-5000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters Office for National Statistics Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £100-1000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters Physiological Society Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshops £2001-5000 and campaigns for early career researchers Portland Press Quality and peer review programme £2001-5000 Publons UK Ltd Quality and peer review programme £2001-5000 Royal College of Veterinary Evidence based veterinary medicine matters: public engagement £5001-10,000 Surgeons Knowledge cocreation workshops Royal Meterological Society Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £100-1000 for early career researchers Royal Pharmaceutical Society Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshops £2001-5000 and campaigns for early career researchers Royal Statistical Society Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £100-1000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters Sage Publications Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £10,001-20,000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters; and quality and peer review programme Science Foundation Ireland Evidence Matters EU: citizen and researcher co-created mandate £20,001-30,000 for evidence hunting MEPs; Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshops for early career researchers Society for Applied Microbiology Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £2001-5000 for early career researchers Society of Experimental Biology Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £2001-5000 for early career researchers Springer Nature John Maddox Prize for Standing up for Science; £5001-10,000 Quality and peer review programme St Andrews University Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £1001-2000 for early career researchers Taylor and Francis Quality and peer review programme and £10,001-20,000 Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science programme EU UCL Patient workshops and advice on design of a public register £10,001-20,000 of clinical trial of regenerative medicine; Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters UK Statistics Authority Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £100-1000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters University of Central Lancashire Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £2001-5000 for early career researchers University of Dundee Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £1001-2000 for early career researchers University of Liverpool Public engagement workshops and development of drug side effects £10,001-20,000 engagement materials including an animation University of Manchester Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £100-1000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters University of Nottingham Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science Workshops and £2001-5000 campaigns for early career researchers University of Southampton Evidence Week in the UK Parliament: bringing together parliamentarians £100-1000 and people from different walks of life to talk about why evidence matters University of Stirling Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £1001-2000 for early career researchers University of Warwick Voice of Young Science: Standing up for Science workshop £1,001-2,000 for early career researchers Wellcome Trust Ask for Evidence ambassadors programme £100,001- 200,000 Wiley Quality and peer review programme £10,001-20,000 Young European Associated Public engagement workshops for annual conference £1001-2000 Researchers network Sense about Science 2 Stephen Street, Bloomsbury, London W1T 1AN Registered Charity No. 1146170 • Company No: 6771027