DOCSLIB.ORG

Television Receiving Antenna System Component Measurements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Television Receiving Antenna System Component Measurements NTIA-REPORT-79-22 Television Receiving Antenna System Component Measurements R.G. FitzGerrel R.D. Jennings J.R. Juroshek us, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary Henry Geller, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information June 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LIST OF FIGURES iv 2. LIST OF TABLES x 3. ABSTRACT 1 4. INTRODUCTION 1 5. DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY 2 2.1 Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) and Mismatch Loss 2 2.2 Insertion Loss 3 2.3 System Loss 4 2.4 Antenna Gain 4 6. ANTENNA CONSTANT 6 7. ANTENNA GAIN MEASUREMENTS 8 8. BALUN INSERTION LOSS 24 9. SIGNAL SPLITTER INSERTION LOSS 24 10. VSWRtS OF ANT$NNAS, BALUNS, AND SPLITTERS 28 11. TRANSMISSION LINE LOSS 32 12. DISCUSSION-CONCLUSIONS 37 13.' REFERENCES 41 APPENDIX. MEASURED RELATIVE GAIN PATTERNS 43 iii, LIST OF FIGUIm~ Figure 1. Typical single-set, single-antenna TV installations 5 A. Indoor antenna on receiver, VHF or UHF. B. Antenna to receiver with "twin lead" trans­ mission line, VHF or UHF. C. Antenna to receiver ·with "twin lead" trans- mission line, VHF and UHF. D. Antenna to receiver with coaxial cable trans­ mission line, VHF and UHF. Figure 2. Dipole antenna constant versus frequency. 7 Figure 3. Typical VHF antenna gain pattern measured at 183 MHz 10 {channel 8). The gain increments are 5 dB and the reference dipole gain level is shown by the circle on the 180 deg - 0 deg axis. Figure 3. Typical UHF antenna gain pattern measured at 641 MHz 11 (channel 42). The gain increments are 5 dB and the reference dipole gain le·vel is shown by the circle on the 180 deg - 0 deg axis. Figure 5. Typical half-wave dipole reference antenna gain 12 pat.tern. The gain increments are 5 dB. Figure 6. Schematic drawing of insertion loss ·measure.ment system. 26 Figure 7. Schematic drawing of splitter insertion lossmeasure- 27 ment system. Connections shown are for the UHF tests. Figure 8. Schematic drawing of VSWR measurement system. 31 Figure 9. Attenuat.ion bounds (best and worst case) versus 33 frequency for new, dry 300-ohm balanced transmission line, derived from manufacturers' data. Figure 10. Attenuation bounds (best and worst case) versus 35 frequency for new, dry RG-6 type coaxial cable, derived from manufacturers' data. Figure 11. Attenuation bounds (best and worst case) versus 36 frequency for new, dry RG-59 type coaxial cable, derived from manufacturers' data. iv LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) Page Figure 12. Increase in line loss because of standing waves (SWR 38 value at the load). To determine the total loss in decibels in a line having an SWR greater than 1, f i.rst; determine the loss for the particular type of line, length and frequency, on the assumption that the line is perfectly matched. Locate this point on the horizontal axis and move up to the curve corresponding to the actual SWR. The corresponding value on the vertical axis gives the additional loss in decibels caused by the standing waves. Figure 13. Graphical presentation of the range of the power budget 40 equation versus frequency for the four systems considered. To convert the P scale to dB relative to 10-6V rec at the 300 ohm receiver terminals with a field strength of 60 dB relative to 10-6V/ m at the antenna, add 59 dB. Figure 14. Measured ant.enna gain versus frequency. 42 Figure A-1 ~ Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 63 MHz 44 for antenna No. 1. Figure A-2. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 79 MHz 45 for antenna No. 1. Figure A-3. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 183 r-1Hz 46 for antenna No. 1. Figure A-4. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 213 MHz 47 for antenna No. 1. Figure A-S. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 63 MHz 48 for antenna No. 2. Figure A-6. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 79 MHz 49 for antenna No. 2. Figure A-7. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 183 MHz 50 for antenna No. 2. Figure A-8. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 213 MHz 51 for antenna No. 2. Figure A-9. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 63 r1Hz 52 for antenna No. 3. Figure A-10. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 79 MHz 53 for antenna No. 3. V LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) Figure 1\-11. Re,lative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at18J MHz 54 for antenna No.3. Figure A-12. Relative gain pa.ttern in the azimuthal plane at 213 MHz 55 fot' antenna No.3. Figure A-13. Relative gain pat,t,ern in the azimuthal plane at 63 MHz 56 for antenna No •. 4., Figure A-14. Relative gain pattern in the aziimut.hal. plane at. 79 MHz 57 f ell" antenna No.4. Figure A-15. Relativeqain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 183 MHz 58 for antenna No.4. Figure A-16. Relative ga,inpatternin the azimuthal plane at 213 MHz 59 f or antenna No.. 4. Figure 1\-1'. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 63 MHz 60 for antenna No. S. Antenna. was mounted on test stand 90 deg off Q,ptical If:boresight'' to tra.nsmltting; a,!l,tenna. Fig:ure A-18. Relative gain patter'n in the azimuthal plane at 79' MHz 61 for an,tenna No .. 5. A,n,tenna was mounted on test stand 90 deq off opt..leal 'Jbo;r'esight. tt to tra,nsmitting a.ntenna. Figure A~t9. Relative 9'ain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 183 MHz 62 for a.ntenna No.5. Antenna was mounted on test sta.nd 90 deg off optical "boresight" to· transmit,ting an,tenna.. Relative gain pat.t,ern in the azimuthal plan.e at 213 MHz 63 for antenna No.5. Ant.enna was mounted on te,s;t stand 90 deg off opt.ical ·'bore·sight" to transmitting ancerma, Fi.g'ure A-21. Rela,tive gain. pattern in·t.he 'azimuthal pIa.ne at, 63 MHz 64 for antenna No'. 6. Relative gain pattern in, the azimuthal plane. at 79 MHz for antenna NQ.. 6.• Figure A-23. Relative gain pattern in theazimu'thal plane at 18'3 MHz 66 for anten,na' No.6. Figure A-24. Relat"ive gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 213 MHz 67 for antenna No.· 6. vi LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) Figure A-2S. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 413 MHz 68 for antenna No.6. Figure A-26. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 641 MHz 69 for antenna NQ. 6. Figure A-27. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 803 MHz 70 for antenna No.6. Beam splitting can be noted. Figure A-2S. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 63 MHz 71 for antenna No.7. Figure A-29. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 79 MHz 72' for antenna No.7. Figure A-30. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 183 MHz 73 for antenna No.7. Figure A-31. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 213 MHz 74 for antenna No.7. Figure A-32. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 473 MHz 75 for antenna No.7. Figure A-33. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 641 MHz 76 for antenna No.7. Figure A-34. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 803 MHz 77 for antenna No.7. Figure A-3S. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 63 MHz 78 for antenna No. B. Figure A-36. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 79 MHz 79 for antenna No.8. Figure A-37. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 183 MHz 80 for antenna No.8. Figure A-38. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 213 MHz 81 for antenna No.8. Figure A-39. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 473 MHz 82 for antenna No.8. Figure A-40. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 641 MHz 83 for antenna No.8. Figure A-41. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 803 Mhz 84 for antenna No.8. vii LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) Page Figure A-42. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 63 MHz 85 for antenna No. 9. Figure A-43. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 79 MHz 86 for antenna No. 9. Figure A-44. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 183 r~Hz 87 for antenna No. 9. Figure A-45. Relative gain pattern in the azi.mut.haL plane at 213 MHz 88 for antenna No. 9. Figure A-46. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 473 MHz 89 for antenna No. 9. Figure A-47. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 641 MHz 90 for antenna No.9. Figure A-48. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 803 MHz 91 for antenna No. 9. Figure A-49. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 473 MHz 92 for antenna No. 10. Figure A-50. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 641 MHz 93 for antenna No. 10. Figure A-51. Relative gain pattern in the azimuthal plane at 803 MHz 94 for antenna No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radiometry and the Friis Transmission Equation Joseph A
    Radiometry and the Friis transmission equation Joseph A. Shaw Citation: Am. J. Phys. 81, 33 (2013); doi: 10.1119/1.4755780 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4755780 View Table of Contents: http://ajp.aapt.org/resource/1/AJPIAS/v81/i1 Published by the American Association of Physics Teachers Related Articles The reciprocal relation of mutual inductance in a coupled circuit system Am. J. Phys. 80, 840 (2012) Teaching solar cell I-V characteristics using SPICE Am. J. Phys. 79, 1232 (2011) A digital oscilloscope setup for the measurement of a transistor’s characteristic curves Am. J. Phys. 78, 1425 (2010) A low cost, modular, and physiologically inspired electronic neuron Am. J. Phys. 78, 1297 (2010) Spreadsheet lock-in amplifier Am. J. Phys. 78, 1227 (2010) Additional information on Am. J. Phys. Journal Homepage: http://ajp.aapt.org/ Journal Information: http://ajp.aapt.org/about/about_the_journal Top downloads: http://ajp.aapt.org/most_downloaded Information for Authors: http://ajp.dickinson.edu/Contributors/contGenInfo.html Downloaded 07 Jan 2013 to 153.90.120.11. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission Radiometry and the Friis transmission equation Joseph A. Shaw Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717 (Received 1 July 2011; accepted 13 September 2012) To more effectively tailor courses involving antennas, wireless communications, optics, and applied electromagnetics to a mixed audience of engineering and physics students, the Friis transmission equation—which quantifies the power received in a free-space communication link—is developed from principles of optical radiometry and scalar diffraction.
    [Show full text]
  • 25. Antennas II
    25. Antennas II Radiation patterns Beyond the Hertzian dipole - superposition Directivity and antenna gain More complicated antennas Impedance matching Reminder: Hertzian dipole The Hertzian dipole is a linear d << antenna which is much shorter than the free-space wavelength: V(t) Far field: jk0 r j t 00Id e ˆ Er,, t j sin 4 r Radiation resistance: 2 d 2 RZ rad 3 0 2 where Z 000 377 is the impedance of free space. R Radiation efficiency: rad (typically is small because d << ) RRrad Ohmic Radiation patterns Antennas do not radiate power equally in all directions. For a linear dipole, no power is radiated along the antenna’s axis ( = 0). 222 2 I 00Idsin 0 ˆ 330 30 Sr, 22 32 cr 0 300 60 We’ve seen this picture before… 270 90 Such polar plots of far-field power vs. angle 240 120 210 150 are known as ‘radiation patterns’. 180 Note that this picture is only a 2D slice of a 3D pattern. E-plane pattern: the 2D slice displaying the plane which contains the electric field vectors. H-plane pattern: the 2D slice displaying the plane which contains the magnetic field vectors. Radiation patterns – Hertzian dipole z y E-plane radiation pattern y x 3D cutaway view H-plane radiation pattern Beyond the Hertzian dipole: longer antennas All of the results we’ve derived so far apply only in the situation where the antenna is short, i.e., d << . That assumption allowed us to say that the current in the antenna was independent of position along the antenna, depending only on time: I(t) = I0 cos(t) no z dependence! For longer antennas, this is no longer true.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Application of a New Planar Balun
    DESIGN AND APPLICATION OF A NEW PLANAR BALUN Younes Mohamed Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2014 APPROVED: Shengli Fu, Major Professor and Interim Chair of the Department of Electrical Engineering Hualiang Zhang, Co-Major Professor Hyoung Soo Kim, Committee Member Costas Tsatsoulis, Dean of the College of Engineering Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Mohamed, Younes. Design and Application of a New Planar Balun. Master of Science (Electrical Engineering), May 2014, 41 pp., 2 tables, 29 figures, references, 21 titles. The baluns are the key components in balanced circuits such balanced mixers, frequency multipliers, push–pull amplifiers, and antennas. Most of these applications have become more integrated which demands the baluns to be in compact size and low cost. In this thesis, a new approach about the design of planar balun is presented where the 4-port symmetrical network with one port terminated by open circuit is first analyzed by using even- and odd-mode excitations. With full design equations, the proposed balun presents perfect balanced output and good input matching and the measurement results make a good agreement with the simulations. Second, Yagi-Uda antenna is also introduced as an entry to fully understand the quasi-Yagi antenna. Both of the antennas have the same design requirements and present the radiation properties. The arrangement of the antenna’s elements and the end-fire radiation property of the antenna have been presented. Finally, the quasi-Yagi antenna is used as an application of the balun where the proposed balun is employed to feed a quasi-Yagi antenna.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinate Transformations-Based Antenna Elements Embedded in a Metamaterial Shell with Scanning Capabilities
    electronics Article Coordinate Transformations-Based Antenna Elements Embedded in a Metamaterial Shell with Scanning Capabilities Dipankar Mitra 1,*, Sukrith Dev 2, Monica S. Allen 2, Jeffery W. Allen 2 and Benjamin D. Braaten 1,* 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA 2 Air Force Research Laboratory, Munitions Directorate, Eglin Air Force Base, FL 32542, USA; [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (M.S.A.); [email protected] (J.W.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.M.); [email protected] (B.D.B.) Abstract: In this work transformation electromagnetics/optics (TE/TO) were employed to realize a non-homogeneous, anisotropic material-embedded beam-steerer using both a single antenna element and an antenna array without phase control circuitry. Initially, through theory and validation with numerical simulations it is shown that beam-steering can be achieved in an arbitrary direction by enclosing a single antenna element within the transformation media. Then, this was followed by an array with fixed voltages and equal phases enclosed by transformation media. This enclosed array was scanned, and the proposed theory was validated through numerical simulations. Further- more, through full-wave simulations it was shown that a horizontal dipole antenna embedded in a metamaterial can be designed such that the horizontal dipole performs identically to a vertical Citation: Mitra, D.; Dev, S.; Allen, dipole in free-space. Similarly, it was also shown that a material-embedded horizontal dipole array M.S.; Allen, J.W.; Braaten, B.D.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Performance Indoor VHF-UHF Antennas
    High‐Performance Indoor VHF‐UHF Antennas: Technology Update Report 15 May 2010 (Revised 16 August, 2010) M. W. Cross, P.E. (Principal Investigator) Emanuel Merulla, M.S.E.E. Richard Formato, Ph.D. Prepared for: National Association of Broadcasters Science and Technology Department 1771 N Street NW Washington, DC 20036 Mr. Kelly Williams, Senior Director Prepared by: MegaWave Corporation 100 Jackson Road Devens, MA 01434 Contents: Section Title Page 1. Introduction and Summary of Findings……………………………………………..3 2. Specific Design Methods and Technologies Investigated…………………..7 2.1 Advanced Computational Methods…………………………………………………..7 2.2 Fragmented Antennas……………………………………………………………………..22 2.3 Non‐Foster Impedance Matching…………………………………………………….26 2.4 Active RF Noise Cancelling……………………………………………………………….35 2.5 Automatic Antenna Matching Systems……………………………………………37 2.6 Physically Reconfigurable Antenna Elements………………………………….58 2.7 Use of Metamaterials in Antenna Systems……………………………………..75 2.8 Electronic Band‐Gap and High Impedance Surfaces………………………..98 2.9 Fractal and Self‐Similar Antennas………………………………………………….104 2.10 Retrodirective Arrays…………………………………………………………………….112 3. Conclusions and Design Recommendations………………………………….128 2 1.0 Introduction and Summary of Findings In 1995 MegaWave Corporation, under an NAB sponsored project, developed a broadband VHF/UHF set‐top antenna using the continuously resistively loaded printed thin‐film bow‐tie shown in Figure 1‐1. It featured a low VSWR (< 3:1) and a constant dipole‐like azimuthal pattern across both the VHF and UHF television bands. Figure 1‐1: MegaWave 54‐806 MHz Set Top TV Antenna, 1995 In the 15 years since then much technical progress has been made in the area of broadband and low‐profile antenna design methods and actual designs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-To-Air Antennas and Antenna Line Products Information About KATHREIN Broadcast
    BROADCAST CATALOGUE Ground-to-Air Antennas and Antenna Line Products Information about KATHREIN Broadcast As of 1st June 2019, KATHREIN SE's (formerly KATHREIN-Werke KG) business unit "BROADCAST" will be transferred to KATHREIN Broadcast GmbH (limited liability company). From 1st June 2019, the new company data are: KATHREIN Broadcast GmbH Ing.-Anton-Kathrein-Str. 1, 3, 5, 7 83101 Rohrdorf, Germany Tax Payer's ID No.: 156/117/31113 VAT Reg. No.: DE 323 189 785 Commercial Register Traunstein: HRB 27745 Catalogue Issue 06/2019 All data published in previous catalogue issues hereby becomes invalid. We reserve the right to make alterations in accordance with the requirements of our customers, therefore for binding data please check valid data sheets on our homepage: www.kathrein.com Please also see additional information on inside back cover. Our quality assurance system and our Our products are compliant to the EU environmental management system apply Directive RoHS as well as to other to the entire company and are certified RoHS environmentally relevant regulations by TÜV according to EN ISO 9001 and (e.g. REACH). EN ISO 14001. Antennas for Communication Antennas for Communication Antennas for Navigation Antennas for Navigation Electrical Accessories Electrical Accessories Mechanical Accessories Mechanical Accessories Services Services Summary of Types The articles are listed by type number in numerical order. Type No. Page Type No. Page Type No. Page Type No. Page 711 ... 727 ... 792 ... K63 ... 711329 50, 51 727463 28, 29 792008 75 K637011 601825 73 727728 34, 35 792246 76 713 ... K64 ... 713316B 56, 57 729 ... 800 ... K6421351 601704 66, 67 713645 83 729803 28, 29 80010228 49 K6421361 601686 68, 69 K6421371 601687 68, 69 714 ..
    [Show full text]
  • UHF VHF Dipole Antenna
    A.H. Systems Model TDS-536 Tuned Dipole Set TDS-536 TV Dipole Set Operation Manual A.H. Systems inc. – May 2014 1 REV B A.H. Systems Model TDS-536 Tuned Dipole Set TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 GENERAL INFORMATION 5 OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS 6 FORMULAS 7 MAINTENANCE 10 WARRANTY 11 A.H. Systems inc. – May 2014 2 REV B A.H. Systems Model TDS-536 Tuned Dipole Set INTRODUCTION CONTENTS – TUNED DIPOLE SET, TV Model Part QTY Number Number Description 1 TSC-536 2573 Transit Storage Case 2 N/A N/A Keys 1 TV-1 2572 Tuned Dipole Antenna (50 MHz – 220 MHz) 2 N/A N/A 17” Extension Elements 2 N/A 2337-2 Telescoping Elements 1 TV-2 2580 Tuned Dipole Antenna (325 MHz – 1000 MHz) 1 SAC-213 2111 3 Meter Cable, N(m) to N(m) 1 ABC-TD 2332-1 Clamp 1 N/A 2346 Tape Measurer A.H. Systems inc. – May 2014 3 REV B A.H. Systems Model TDS-536 Tuned Dipole Set INTENDED PURPOSES This equipment is intended for indoor and outdoor use in a wide variety of industrial and scientific applications, and designed to be used in the process of generating, controlling and measuring high levels of electromagnetic Radio Frequency (RF) energy. It is the responsibility of the user to assure that the device is operated in a location which will control the radiated energy such that it will not cause injury and will not violate regulatory levels of electromagnetic interference. RANGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS This equipment is designed to be safe under the following environmental conditions: Indoor use Altitude up to 2000M Temperature of 5C to 40C Maximum relative humidity 80 % for temperatures up to 31C.
    [Show full text]
  • Adding an Input Balun in AAA-1 in Dipole Mode to Reduce 2 Nd Order IMD Distortions When Asymmetric Signal Source (Antenna) Is Used
    Adding Input Balun in the Dipole Amplifier ……. Rev.1.1 © LZ1AQ Adding an Input Balun in AAA-1 in Dipole Mode to Reduce 2 nd Order IMD Distortions when Asymmetric Signal Source (antenna) is Used When using large loops as dipole arms with AAA-1 active antenna amplifier or totally asymmetric electric antennas such as ground plane (GP), some 2-nd order IMD distortion might occur due to asymmetric signal source combined with the strong signals. The vertical dipole is partially asymmetric antenna – the lower arm has higher capacitance to ground than the upper one. Also nearby conducting objects can influence the dipole symmetry additionally. The dipole amplifier itself has very high OIP2 to symmetric signal sources – in order of +90 dBm but it can not be accomplished since the signals in the two arms of the amplifier might have different amplitudes due to input asymmetry. How to localize 2 nd order IMD distortions? The easiest way is to check the 2 nd order products (F1+F2 and 2F ) which might exist as a spurious signals in 14.400 – 15.200 MHz band as result of action of strong broadcasting stations on 41 m band with frequencies 7.200-7.600 MHz. Night time is most suitable for this experiment. The RX must have good dynamic range and a good input band pass filter which must stop the fundamental signals at 41 m band to avoid generation of 2 nd order products in the RX itself. All candidate spurious frequencies in 14-15MHz zone should be multiples of 5 KHz since this is the distance between broadcasting frequencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying and Locating Cable TV Interference Application Note
    Application Note Identifying and Locating Cable TV Interference A Primer for Public Safety Engineers and Cellular Operators Introduction In the early days of cable TV systems, the signals being sent over the cables were the same signals that were transmitted over the air. This minimized the extent of interference problems. Problems in those days would often manifest as ghosting and would look like a multipath reflection. However as cable TV systems offered more and more TV channels and other services, signals transmitted over the cables covered virtually the entire spectrum from 7 MHz to over 1 GHz. See table 1. There are many different services that operate over the air in that frequency range. All those services can be subject to interfering signals radiating from cable TV systems and in turn over the air signals can leak into the cable TV plant and cause interference. As cable TV systems began to expand the frequency range in the cable, interference started to be experienced by aeronautical users in the 100 to 140 MHz range and amateur radio operators in the 50 MHz to 54 MHz, 144 to 148 MHz, 220 to 225 MHz, and the 440 to 450 MHz bands. First responders could also experience interference when operating near a leaky cable plant. Problems in the 700 and 850 MHz cellular bands emerged as the frequencies in the cables were pushed higher and higher to provide more channels for cable TV customers. As the 600 MHz frequency range begins to be used by cellular operators, problems are likely to be seen there as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement and Simulation of Reflector Antenna L.J.Foged , M.A
    Measurement and Simulation of Reflector Antenna L.J.Foged , M.A. Saporetti , M. Sierra-Castanner , E. Jorgensen , T. Voigt , F. Calvano , D. Tallini Abstract— Well-established procedures are consolidated to II. MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN determine the associated measurement uncertainty for a given antenna and measurements scenario [1-2]. Similar criteria for Comparative measurements based on high accuracy establishing uncertainties in numerical modelling of the same reference antennas and involving different antenna antenna are still to be established. In this paper, we investigate measurement systems are important instruments in the the achievable agreement between antenna measurement and evaluation, benchmarking and calibration of the measurement simulation when external error sources are minimized. The test facilities. Regular inter comparisons are also an important object, is a reflector fed by a wideband dual ridge horn (SR40-A instrument for traceability and quality maintenance. These and SH4000). The highly stable reference antenna has been activities promote and document the measurement confidence selected to minimize uncertainty related to finite manufacturing and material parameter accuracy. Two frequencies, 10.7GHz level among the participants and are an important prerequisite and 18GHz have been selected for detailed investigation. for official or unofficial certification of the facilities. Different European facility comparison campaigns, have The antenna has been measured in two reference spherical near-field measurement facilities as a preparatory activity for a been completed during the last years in the framework of Facility Comparison Campaign on this antenna in the frame of a different European Activities: Antenna Measurement Activity EurAAP/WG5 activity. A full CAD model, in step compatible of the Antenna Centre of Excellence-VT UE Frame Program; format, has been provided and the antenna has been simulated COST ASSIST, IC0603 and COST-VISTA, IC1102.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS Rules of Thumb
    ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS Rules of Thumb: 1. The Gain of an antenna with losses is given by: Where BW are the elev & az another is: 2 and N 4B0A 0 ' Efficiency beamwidths in degrees. G • Where For approximating an antenna pattern with: 2 A ' Physical aperture area ' X 0 8 G (1) A rectangle; X'41253,0 '0.7 ' BW BW typical 8 wavelength N 2 ' ' (2) An ellipsoid; X 52525,0typical 0.55 2. Gain of rectangular X-Band Aperture G = 1.4 LW Where: Length (L) and Width (W) are in cm 3. Gain of Circular X-Band Aperture 3 dB Beamwidth G = d20 Where: d = antenna diameter in cm 0 = aperture efficiency .5 power 4. Gain of an isotropic antenna radiating in a uniform spherical pattern is one (0 dB). .707 voltage 5. Antenna with a 20 degree beamwidth has a 20 dB gain. 6. 3 dB beamwidth is approximately equal to the angle from the peak of the power to Peak power Antenna the first null (see figure at right). to first null Radiation Pattern 708 7. Parabolic Antenna Beamwidth: BW ' d Where: BW = antenna beamwidth; 8 = wavelength; d = antenna diameter. The antenna equations which follow relate to Figure 1 as a typical antenna. In Figure 1, BWN is the azimuth beamwidth and BW2 is the elevation beamwidth. Beamwidth is normally measured at the half-power or -3 dB point of the main lobe unless otherwise specified. See Glossary. The gain or directivity of an antenna is the ratio of the radiation BWN BW2 intensity in a given direction to the radiation intensity averaged over Azimuth and Elevation Beamwidths all directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Pattern, Gain, and Directivity James Mclean, Robert Sutton, Rob Hoffman, TDK RF Solutions
    Interpreting Antenna Performance Parameters for EMC Applications: Part 2: Radiation Pattern, Gain, and Directivity James McLean, Robert Sutton, Rob Hoffman, TDK RF Solutions This article is the second in a three-part tutorial series covering antenna terminology. As noted in the first part, a great deal of effort has been made over the years to standardize antenna terminology. The de facto standard is the IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas, published in 1983. However, the EMC community has developed its own distinct vernacular which contains terms not included in the IEEE standard. In the first part of this series, we discussed radiation efficiency and input impedance match. In the second part of this series, we will discuss antenna field regions and antenna gain and how they relate to EMC measurements. Geometrical Considerations In order to quantitatively discuss radiation from antennas, it is necessary to first specify a coordinate system for describing the antenna and the associated electromagnetic fields. The most natural coordinate system for this task is the spherical coordinate system. This is because at a sufficient distance from an antenna (or any localized source of electromagnetic radiation), the electromagnetic fields must decay inversely with radial distance from the antenna (see references 1 and 2). Traditional spherical coordinates consist of a radial distance, an elevation angle, and an azimuthal angle as shown in Figure 1. The elevation angle is taken as the angle between a line drawn from the origin to the point and the z axis. The azimuthal angle is taken as the angle between the projection of this line in the x-y plane and the x axis.
    [Show full text]