DOCSLIB.ORG

10-08-26 Planning Committee Minutes.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10-08-26 Planning Committee Minutes.Pdf 29 26.8.2010 Planning PLANNING COMMITTEE Minutes of the proceedings at a meeting of the Committee held in the Council Chamber at South Lakeland House, Kendal, on Thursday, 26 August 2010 at 10.00 a.m. Present Councillors Ian McPherson (Chairman) Brenda Gray (Vice-Chairman) Brian Cooper Joss Curwen Colin Davies Sheila Eccles Sylvia Emmott Clive Graham Colin Hodgson Janette Jenkinson Sonia Lawson David Williams Mary Wilson Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Alan Baverstock, Philip Dixon, Frank Hodson, Kevin Lancaster and Maureen Nicholson. Officers Zaheer Bashir Solicitor Lillian Hopkins Planning Officer (part) Janine Jenkinson Assistant Democratic Services Officer Mark Shipman Development Control Team Leader P/040 MINUTES RESOLVED – That the Chairman be authorised to sign, as a correct record, the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 29 July 2010. P/041 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST RESOLVED – That it be noted that Councillor Brian Cooper made a declaration of interest in Minute P/044 (Planning Application No.SL/2010/0382) and Minute P/044 (Planning Application No.SL/2010/0360). P/042 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 – EXCLUDED ITEMS RESOLVED – That it be noted that there were no items in Part II of the Agenda. P/043 PLANNING APPLICATIONS The Development Control Team Leader submitted a Schedule of Planning Applications and his recommendations thereon. RESOLVED – That (1) the applications be determined as indicated below (the numbers denote the Schedule numbers of the application); 30 26.8.2010 Planning (2) except where stated below, the applications be subject to the relevant conditions and advice notes, as outlined in the Schedule; and (3) except where stated below, the reasons for refusal be those as outlined in the Schedule. Note - Councillor Brian Cooper declared a personal interest in the following item of business, by virtue of being a former resident of the area. P/044 COMPLEX PLANNING APPLICATIONS RESOLVED – That the following applications be determined in the manner set out:- 4.SL/2010/0360 KENDAL: Recreational area between Vicars Fields and Long Close, Kendal. Recreational facilities and equipment. (Mrs Diane Horner) A site visit had been undertaken and Members had now had the opportunity to assess the relationship between the play equipment and the neighbouring properties. The main issue for consideration was whether particular items of equipment were located too close to residential properties on Vicarage Drive and Vicars Fields and exerted a detrimental impact on the occupiers of those properties. Overall, Members felt that the siting of the play equipment was acceptable and that the facilities would be a beneficial asset to the local community. GRANT – Subject to conditions relating to landscaping details, a standard time limit and the implementation of suitable fencing. 9.SL/2010/0457 KENDAL: 1A Garth Brow, Kendal. Two storey extension to care home. (Mrs Alex Wolfenden) The Committee felt that the development was appropriate in this residential area in terms of scale and design and the level of car parking provision in this location was acceptable. GRANT 1.SL/2010/0089 OLD HUTTON AND HOLMESCALES: Little Eskrigg End Farm, Old Hutton, Kendal. Storage and animal treatment building. (Mr & Mrs J Heap) In order to appreciate the location of the proposed development Members felt that that it would be appropriate to defer a decision on this application in order to undertake a site visit. DEFER – for site visit. 7.SL/2010/0416 STRICKLAND ROGER: Houseman Tenement Farm, Burneside, Kendal. Dwelling with associated access and installation of septic tank. (Mr Paul Whitton) 31 26.8.2010 Planning Members were advised that the report from Lancashire County Council Land Agent had concluded that there was no established functional need for a farm worker to be available on site and therefore the development of a farm building could not be justified. Notwithstanding the advice from the Council’s agricultural consultant, the Planning Officer stated that the applicant had achieved a viable and sustainable scale of long term farm enterprise with high livestock levels and recommended that there was a valid need for a farmer to be resident on site. In addition, the Committee was informed that the Planning Department intended to seek advice from an alternative agent for future applications. GRANT 10.SL/2010/0458 SKELSMERGH: Field to East of Dodding Green, Mealbank, Kendal. Erection of two poly tunnels. (Friends for a UK Cenacolo Community) The Planning Officer read out in full a letter of objection that had been received from Mr Kell. Concerns raised related to the size of the poly tunnels and adverse impact on the rural character of the area, neighbouring properties and the adjoining listed building. A full copy of his submission is available on the Planning Department’s file. Members welcomed the application and wished to support this unique and worthwhile charity. GRANT – Subject to the condition detailed in the Schedule and an additional condition relating to the height of the hedge. 2.SL/2010/0093 GRANGE OVER SANDS: Berners car park, Kent Bank Road, Grange over Sands. Erection of health centre. (Mr A Caldwell) The Planning Officer reported that the applicant had provided information regarding the level of car parking provision. A public consultation exercise had been carried out and a further assessment had confirmed that the proposed number of spaces was appropriate. With regards to drainage and the discharge of surface water, Members were advised that a suitable attenuation system could be implemented to manage surface water. The Environment Agency had indicated that they were comfortable with the details. Members were keen to support the proposal as the development would significantly improve health facilities for local residents. The Corporate Director (Communities) be authorised to GRANT subject to the conditions as detailed in the Schedule and 32 26.8.2010 Planning satisfactory conclusion to negotiations regarding the details and provision of car parking spaces. 12.SL/2010/0521 KIRKBY LONSDALE: Hawkrigg Lune Valley Park, Hawkrigg Farm, Old Town. Installation of Wind Turbine. (Mr Gareth Cowin) Members were advised that a letter of objection had been received highlighting concerns relating to the developments impact on the local ecology, in particular bats, buzzards and owls. In addition, the Committee was advised that although an acoustic report had been submitted with the application, it did not relate to this site, the existing background noise levels or the proposed turbine noise in this location. Members felt that insufficient evidence had been submitted to determine the impact the application would exert on neighbouring residents and therefore elected to refuse the proposal. REFUSE 3.SL/2010/0349 GRANGE OVER SANDS: 22 Highfield Road, Grange over Sands. Raising roof to form first floor ancillary accommodation in detached outbuilding. (Mr K Dale and Ms C Wilde) The application had been deferred at the last Committee meeting to allow for a site visit. Members had now had the opportunity to view and assess the application in relation to the location. Concerns were raised regarding the ancillary use of the accommodation and the development’s impact on the amenity of neighbouring residents. REFUSE – due to overbearing impact on neighbouring residents. 5.SL/2010/0361 EGTON WITH NEWLAND: Land register parcel ID 1015, Plumpton, Newlands, Near Ulverston. Erection of agricultural livestock building. (Mr Thor Atkinson) A site visit had been undertaken by the Committee and Members had now had the opportunity to view the site and assess the issues raised by the application. The main issues in this case related to the visual and environmental impact of the proposed building and the justification for constructing a substantial building isolated from the established farm. Overall, it was felt that subject to suitable conditions to minimise the impact of the development, the application could be 33 26.8.2010 Planning supported. GRANT – Subject to conditions to relating to landscaping, materials to be used and a standard time limit. Note - Councillor Brian Cooper declared a personal interest in the following item of business, by virtue of being a customer of the garage. 6.SL/2010/0382 HOLME: Taylor’s Garage, Milnthorpe Road, Holme, Carnforth. Demolition of commercial service garage and erection of three dwellings. (Mr Matthew Towers). The Planning Officer advised the Committee that Cumbria Highways had stated that the application was broadly acceptable, although the arrangement was awkward and cramped. Members raised concerns regarding the proximity of the development to nearby residential properties and felt it would be appropriate to defer a decision on the application in order to undertake a site visit. DEFER – for site visit. 8.SL/2010/0456 GRANGE OVER SANDS: 4 Sedgwick Court, Cart Lane, Grange over Sands. Extensions and alterations. (Mr Alan and Mrs Margaret Calvert) Consideration of this application had been deferred at the last meeting in order to undertake a site visit. Members had now had the opportunity to view the site and consider the impact of the extension upon the surrounding Conservation Area and nearby properties. Subject to the application of suitable conditions, Members felt the submission was acceptable. GRANT 11.SL/2010/0503 URSWICK: 5 St Marys Garth, Great Urswick, Ulverston. Single storey extension. (South Lakes Housing) Members were advised that the exceptional circumstances of the occupiers of the property could be viewed as a material consideration in this instance. On balance, the Committee considered the impact of the development to be acceptable. GRANT P/045 STRAIGHTFORWARD PLANNING APPLICATIONS RESOLVED – That the following application be determined in the manner set out:- 34 26.8.2010 Planning 13.SL/2010/0633 GRANGE OVER SANDS: 17 Priory Crescent, Grange over Sands. Single storey extension. (Mr & Mrs A Christie) The application had been brought to the Committee due to one of the applicants being an employee of the Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Westl\10HLAND
    162 FAR .WESTl\10HLAND. [KELLY~ }l'A~MR'RS continuetL 13a.inbridg-B Jonn, Xnt:Jck, Rnvenstone- Beck Richal'd, Sandwath, -Ravenllklne- .!.tkinson Jobn, Ryclal, Ambleside dale, KiI'kby St~phen I dale, Kirkby Btephen ' i AtkinsOIl John, Sandpot. Mallerstan/;. Bainbridg'e Richard, Holme, Carnfotth Beck Thomas, Low Fairbanlr, NMMr Kirkby Stephen Bainbridge Thomas, Church Brougb, Staveley, Kendal Atki.nson J. Town head, Cliburn,Penrth Kirkby Stephen 'Becks John, Langdale, Tebay RB.~ Atkirtson John, Witherslack, Grange- Bainbridge Thomas, 0rc-sby Garrett, Bec;mith John, High Ewbanll', Stain- over-Sands R. S.O Kirkby Stephen ' more South, Kirkby Stepbell AJldnson John Thomas, Town head, Bainbridge William, ArcheI"' hill, Bell A. &, Wm. Reagin,SOOp H:S.D Milburn, Newbiggin R. S. 0 Langdale, Tebay R S. 0 Bell George, Dirk 'rigg, Mallent:mg, Atkinson Joseph, Barnskew, Reagill, Bainbridge William, Croft end~ ,Bramp- Kirkby 8tephen Shap RS.O ton, Appleby Bell Henry, Dummah hill, Stainmore Atk~nson J.Ghyll hd. Crosthwaite,Kndl Bainbridge Wm. 1 Garthshill, Raven- South, Kirkby Stephen- Atkimon.T. Waitby, Kirkby StephAn stonedale, Kirkby Stephen Bell Tsaac, Kirkby Thore, Poorith Atkinson Mrs: Margaret, Brunthwaite, Bainbridge William, Keisley, .Appleby Bell .lames, Drybeck, Appleby Old Hutton, Kendal Bainhridge Wm. Kelleth, Tebay RS.O Bell .lames, Outhgill, Kirk'bj Stepmn Atkinson Mark, Greyber. Maulds Me8- Bainbridge W. Waitby, Kirkby Stephn Bell .Tames, Reagill, Shap R.S.O b. burn, Shap R.S.O Ba.ines Mrs. Agnes & Son, Whasset, Bell John, G'rackent.horpe, Appleb:f ..Atkinson Mark, Murton, Appleby Beetham, Milnthorpe R.S.O Bell .In. Guest ford, Whinfell, K~dal . Atkinson M.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 27 2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB KBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB DL Sir Andrew Vheatley CBE To the Ht Hon Merlyn Rees, MF Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOK FUTURE ULECTOHAL ARRANGEMENTS FOK THE SOUTH LAKELAND DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY Ot1 CUMBRIA 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for South Lakeland district in accordance with the requirements of Section 63 of, and Schedule 9'to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Section 60(1) and (2) of the T972 Act, notice was given on 19 August 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the South Lakeland District Council, copies of which were circulated to Cumbria County Council, parish councils and parish meetings in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • KENTMERE HALL and the GILPINS 1373 -1672 by Joe Scott Based on a Talk Given at a Society Meeting Feb 9Th 1999
    The Occasional Papers of the Staveley and District History Society Number 12 KENTMERE HALL AND THE GILPINS 1373 -1672 By Joe Scott based on a talk given at a Society meeting Feb 9th 1999 As the plan below shows the pele tower on the left Kentmere Hall is the most picturesque of the late is the oldest part. A spiral stair in its north-east mediaeval fortified houses of the Kendal area. corner led up to the upper floors. The stonework Some like Burneside are far more dilapidated; of the central part, the hall, and the cross wing on others like Sizergh have been transformed into the right shows that they were built up to a stately homes. But Kentmere has not changed hundred years after the tower. Before this there very much in the last 300 years. may have been an earlier Hall, probably a single storey building with a thatched roof on a timber frame. 2 The tower, with its complex battlements and turrets and its elegant window was built in an age when stone buildings were rare, and when the sandstone for the window surrounds had to be brought from miles away on packhorses. Another striking feature of the Hall is its position. There is no sign of an outer defensive wall, and the site is overlooked from high ground within easy bowshot on three sides. Despite the impressive machicolation, defenders on the roof parapet would have been an easy target. The Hall may have provided some security against a gang of unruly neighbours in the disorderly years of the later Middle Ages, we may suspect from its The main room of the first floor had an elegant position as well as its elegance that its builder was window facing south, a fireplace and a door into thinking more of prestige and status than of real the upper part of the hall, as well as doors to the tactical defence.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan (2006)
    & Alterations (Final Composite Plan) This document combines the South Lakeland Local Plan (adopted in 1997) and the Alterations to the Local Plan (adopted in March 2006) Lawrence Conway Strategic Director Customer Services Published September 2007 he South Lakeland Local Plan and Alterations (Final Composite Plan) T March 2007) brings together in a single document: • the South Lakeland Local Plan, adopted in 1997 • the Alterations to the Local Plan, adopted in March 2006 All three documents and further information on the Local Plan can be viewed or downloaded from the Council's website at www.southlakeland.gov.uk/planning This combined document brings together the relevant polices and supporting text from both the South Lakeland Local Plan and Local Plan Alterations for the convenience of readers, who previously had to refer to two separate documents. PREFACE It is important to note that the Council has not amended the contents of either document - both of which contain references, which while correct at the time of PREFACE their respective adoptions, but may now be dated. The Local Plan policies and text which have been added or altered (in whole or part) through the Local Plan Alterations are shown within grey shaded boxes. The Development Plan The South Lakeland Local Plan and Alterations to the Local Plan form part of the statutory Development Plan for South Lakeland District, outside the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales National Parks. It sets out land use policies to guide new development through granting of planning permission. The Development Plan also comprises the Cumbria and Lake District Joint Structure Plan, adopted in April 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Longsleddale Parish Plan
    Longsleddale Parish Plan Contents Page 1. Introduction 2 1.1 The place 2 1.2 The people 3 1.3 Drawing up the plan 3 2. The Plan 5 2.1 Vision 5 2.2 Planning 6 2.3 Community and Visitors 7 2.4 Roads, verges, hedges and tracks 7 2.5 Transport 8 2.6 Electronic Communications 9 2.7 Energy 9 2.8 Other Services 10 2.8.1 Emergency services 10 2.8.2 Health 10 2.8.3 Education 10 2.8.4 Refuse 11 2.8.5 Post 11 2.9 Wildlife 11 1 Longsleddale Parish Plan 1. Introduction 1.1 The Place Longsleddale is a parish in the ward of Whinfell, the district of South Lakeland, the county of Cumbria, and it is in the Lake District National Park. It is bounded by the parishes of Over Staveley and Kentmere to the west; Shap Rural to the north; Fawcett Forest and Whitwell & Selside to the east; Strickland Roger to the south. The parish is an area of 2717 hectares, encompassing the upper valley of the River Sprint, 8 miles long, 2 miles wide, ranging from SD5299 to NY4607, from Garnett Bridge in the south to Harter Fell in the north. Longsleddale is a non-nucleated village, the 30 houses being scattered over 4½ miles, each sited above the flood plain, but where there is water from spring or stream all year round. The centre of the community, with Church and Community Hall, is at NY500029. Longsleddale has no parish council, but has a well attended Parish Meeting twice a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Westmoreland in the Late Seventeenth Century by Colin Phillips
    WESTMORLAND ABOUT 1670 BY COLIN PHILLIPS Topography and climate This volume prints four documents relating to the hearth tax in Westmorland1. It is important to set these documents in their geographical context. Westmorland, until 1974 was one of England’s ancient counties when it became part of Cumbria. The boundaries are shown on map 1.2 Celia Fiennes’s view in 1698 of ‘…Rich land in the bottoms, as one may call them considering the vast hills above them on all sides…’ was more positive than that of Daniel Defoe who, in 1724, considered Westmorland ‘A country eminent only for being the wildest, most barren and frightful of any that I have passed over in England, or even Wales it self. ’ It was a county of stark topographical contrasts, fringed by long and deep waters of the Lake District, bisected by mountains with high and wild fells. Communications were difficult: Helvellyn, Harter Fell, Shap Fell and the Langdale Fells prevented easy cross-county movement, although there were in the seventeenth century three routes identified with Kirkstone, Shap, and Grayrigg.3 Yet there were more fertile lowland areas and 1 TNA, Exchequer, lay subsidy rolls, E179/195/73, compiled for the Michaelmas 1670 collection, and including Kendal borough. The document was printed as extracts in W. Farrer, Records relating to the barony of Kendale, ed. J. F. Curwen (CWAAS, Record Series, 4 & 5 1923, 1924; reprinted 1998, 1999); and, without the exempt, in The later records relating to north Westmorland, ed. J. F. Curwen (CWAAS, Record Series, 8, 1932); WD/Ry, box 28, Ms R, pp.1-112, for Westmorland, dated 1674/5, and excluding Kendal borough and Kirkland (heavily edited in J.
    [Show full text]
  • No. Property Name Name Surname Age Relationship Occupation Place
    No. Property Name Name Surname Age Relationship Occupation Place of birth 58 Silver Street Thomas Abba 50 Head Bobbin Turner Westmorland – Troutbeck 58 Silver Street Charlotte Abba 50 Wife Lancashire – Ulverston 58 Silver Street Alice Abba 9 Niece Scholar Lancashire – Spark Bridge 92 Village William Abba 73 Head Bobbin Turner Westmorland – Hugill 92 Village Isabella Abba 72 Wife Westmorland – Bowness 9 Long Bank James Adams 33 Lodger Navvy Labourer Scotland – Glasgow 23 Millrigg Jonathan Addison 50 Head Farmer Westmorland – Staveley 23 Millrigg Eleanor Addison 50 Wife Westm’d – Strickland Roger 23 Millrigg James Addison 20 Son Farm Servant Westmorland – Staveley 23 Millrigg Isabella Addison 15 Daughter Westmorland – Staveley 23 Millrigg Mary Eleanor Addison 13 Daughter Scholar Westmorland – Staveley 23 Millrigg Betsy Addison 9 Daughter Scholar Westmorland – Staveley 23 Millrigg Mary Maria Addison 14 Sister Scholar Westmorland – Kentmere 23 Millrigg Robert Addison 9 Brother Scholar Westmorland – Kentmere 9 Long Bank John Alderson 31 Lodger Navvy Labourer Yorkshire – Stanton 7 Birk Field Thomas Allen 49 Head Farmer Westmorland – Whinfell 7 Birk Field Mary Allen 32 Wife Westmorland – Stainton 7 Birk Field Hannah Allen 10 Daughter Scholar Westmorland – Staveley 7 Birk Field Roger Allen 8 Son Scholar Westmorland – Staveley 7 Birk Field Thomas Allen 5 Son Scholar Westmorland – Staveley 7 Birk Field Betty Bateson Allen 2 Daughter Westmorland – Staveley 9 Long Bank Thomas Allen 53 Lodger Navvy Labourer Birmingham 73 Village Edward Powell Almond
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Click Here
    Our Lead Authority: South Lakeland District Council (SLDC), with the Lake District National Park (LDNP) The Owner of the Neighbourhood Plan: Burneside Parish Council (Strickland Roger & Strickland Ketel) Professional Consultant: Mr Nigel McGurk, Erimax Ltd. Our aspirations: Our aspiration is to transform Burneside into a world-class village, for the benefit of the whole community, businesses and visitors alike. The foundation and drivers for change will be based on our rich heritage, world-class manufacturing facilities, unique character and shared values. Together we can rejuvenate our village and inspire change. Burneside Parish Council Our parish council has embraced the Localism ethos. We fully endorse the transfer of power, authority and resources from central government to local government and other local public agencies, who in turn devolve to and empower communities and individuals to take more responsibility and ownership of many aspects of their lives, at a local level. The Burneside Partnership This public/private partnership was formed in 2014, with the fundamental aim of inspiring sustainable development and seizing the opportunities that Localism offers local communities. The Partnership comprises: Ellergreen Estate (landowner), James Cropper PLC, The Anglers Inn Trust (charity for the benefit of Burneside and landowner) and Burneside Parish Council. In 2015 the Partnership commissioned and published, A Vision for Burneside document. During the creation and communication of this document, our partners and many other Burneside stakeholders were consulted. The Burneside Neighbourhood Plan is the logical next step: inspired by this innovative approach to Localism, together with our determination to transform our village and community, the parish wishes to engage the whole community in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Notice of Election
    NOTICE OF ELECTION South Lakeland District Council Election of Parish Councillors 1. Elections are to be held for Parish Councillors for each of the Parishes or Parish Wards listed in the schedule below. 2. Nomination papers must be delivered to the Returning Officer at South Lakeland House, Lowther Street, KENDAL, Cumbria, LA9 4UQ between 9.30am and 4.30pm on any working day from the date of publication of this notice (excluding bank holidays) but not later than 4pm on Wednesday, 3rd April 2019. 3. Nomination papers may be obtained from the offices of the Returning Officer at the same address, during the times stated above, or from the person named in the Schedule below, who will, at the request of any elector for the electoral area, prepare a nomination paper for signature. 4. If any election is contested the poll, will take place on Thursday, 2nd May 2019, between the hours of 7am and 10pm. 5. Applications to register to vote must reach the Electoral Registration Officer by 12 midnight on Friday, 12th April 2019. Applications can be made online at www.gov.uk/register-to-vote. 6. Applications, amendments or cancellations of postal votes must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at the address shown below by 5pm on Monday, 15th April 2019. 7. Applications to vote by proxy at this election must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at the address shown below by 5pm on Wednesday, 24th April 2019. 8. Applications to vote by emergency proxy at this election on the grounds of physical incapacity or for work/service reasons must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at the address shown below by 5pm on Thursday, 2nd May 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission For
    SHEET 7, MAP 7 Proposed electoral division boundaries in Kendal in South Lakeland borough t 6 n St Oswalds i A M Meal Bank C of E r Primary e v Burneside i School R Ellergreen Park Cricket STRICKLAND ROGER CP Field nt Ellergreen Park pri r S ive THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND R R iv e r G E K i M l L e t HO n h INT t w Football PR Gilthwaiterigg a ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CUMBRIA S i t SKELSMERGH CP Ground e r i 5 g 8 g 6 B A k e c ck BURNESIDE WARD Be g rig ite Draft recommendations for electoral division boundaries in wa HELME LANE ilth G Golf Course the County of Cumbria October 2011 Sheet 7 of 9 Spoil Heap G I L D T A Golf course O H Mint River R W K N This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of A A I B T L the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. E A R E M Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. I G The Todds G The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2011. L A N Golf Course E Far Rigg D A Scale : 1cm = 0.07000 km Industrial O R Estate Y Business B Grid Interval 1km E Park L P P A STRICKLAND KETEL CP R Industrial P i v A e Estate D r K UPPER KENT ED D Creamery e Y n t L (83) A int N r M E ive D R A KENTRIGG O Lane Foot Farm R L L E W SCALTHWAITERIGG CP E Spital Farm L B T T U E R Lake District Old K N Business Park Quarry E S Benson Hall ID Factory Superstore E R O A LO D W G Q AR UE TH KENDAL STRICKLAND Rugby Rugby EN Ground Ground KATHERINES AVE
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2018, North West
    North West Register 2018 HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / NORTH WEST Contents The Register III Merseyside 64 Content and criteria III Knowsley 64 Liverpool 64 Criteria for inclusion on the Register V Sefton 67 Reducing the risks VII St Helens 69 Wirral 71 Key statistics XI Warrington (UA) 74 Publications and guidance XII Key to the entries XIV Entries on the Register by local planning XVI authority Blackburn with Darwen (UA) 1 Blackpool (UA) 1 Cheshire East (UA) 2 Cheshire West and Chester (UA) 6 Cumbria 10 Allerdale 10 Barrow-in-Furness 12 Carlisle 13 Copeland 16 Eden 18 Lake District (NP) 22 South Lakeland 28 Greater Manchester 30 Bolton 30 Bury 32 Manchester 33 Oldham 36 Rochdale 39 Salford 41 Stockport 44 Tameside 46 Trafford 48 Wigan 49 Halton (UA) 50 Lancashire 51 Burnley 51 Chorley 53 Fylde 54 Hyndburn 54 Lancaster 55 Pendle 57 Preston 57 Ribble Valley 58 Rossendale 59 West Lancashire 61 Wyre 63 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / NORTH WEST LISTED BUILDINGS THE REGISTER Listing is the most commonly encountered type of statutory protection of heritage assets. A listed building Content and criteria (or structure) is one that has been granted protection as being of special architectural or historic interest. The LISTING older and rarer a building is, the more likely it is to be listed. Buildings less than 30 years old are listed only if Definition they are of very high quality and under threat. iListing s All the historic environment matters but there are mand atory: if special interest is believed to be present, some elements which warrant extra protection through then the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and the planning system.
    [Show full text]