-
- WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN - SECTION II - - - TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE - - SEWERAGE AUTHORITY - - - - -
- PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER a LAND SURVEYOR PROFESS~NAL PLANNER - AND CO~SULTING ENGINEER - -
NEPTUNE REGION WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SECTION II
TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE SEWERAGE AUTHORITY
-
December 7, 1973
~}W.4- /dA:~~/1 THOMAS W. BIRDSALL, P.E. Consulting Engineer - SEWERAGE AUTHORITY
MEMBERS WILSON M. KENNEDY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JOSEPH WARDELL, CHAIRMAN TEL. 988-6868 JOSEPH A. SHAFTO. VICE-CHAIRMAN ROBERT R. GOODRICH. SECRETARY P. 0. Box 384 MELVIN A. HOOD. TREASURER NEPTUNE. NEW JERSEY THOMAS NICOL 07753
TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH
December 7, 1973
State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection John Fitch Plaza Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Attn: Mr. Robert C. Vincent, Chief Bureau of Water Pollution Control In accordance with our recent correspondence and your letter dated September 18, 1973, this report is submitted as the second section of the Neptune Region, Wastewater Man agement Plan of the Township of Neptune Sewerage Authority. I will appreciate your timely review and approval of this report, in consideration of the urgency of the project to complete final design before May 15, 1974. The paragraph of this report on effluent disposal has been deferred for approximately two weeks to allow our environ- mental and dn~ineering consultants to complete a cost versus dilution optimization study and reach agreement on the location of the ocean diffuser.
Very truly yours,
L ~~o,:;~. t\c~-~ ...t W1lson M. Kenn~, Directo
rrownshin o Ant unA ;· ev:~r·:1.ge hority
WMK: CRB/elm
1- -
i
WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PLANT
SECTION II Page 1.0 Treatment Works, Description and Alternatives 1.0/l
2.0 Infiltration/Inflow Evaluation Survey Proposal 2.0/l
2.1 Summary, Infiltration/Inflow Evaluation Surv~'Y 2.0/l 2.2 Avon-by the-Sea Borough, Infiltration/Inflow 2.0/2 Evaluation Survey Cost Proposal (Borough Engineer, D. M. Newman)
2.3 · Bradley Beach Borough, Infiltration/Inflow 2.0/16 Evaluation Survey Cost Proposal (Borough Engineer, L. S. Avakian)
2.4 Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association 2.0/21 Infiltration/Inflow Evaluation Survey Cost Proposal (Consulting Engineer, L.S. Avakian)
2.5 Neptune City Borough, Infiltation/Inflow 2.0/27 Evaluation Survey (Borough Engineer, D. M. Newman) 2.6 Township of Neptune, Infiltration/Inflow 2.0/28 Evaluation Survey Cost Proposal (Township Engineer, T. W, Birdsall) 3.0 Sludge Disposal, Description of Method 3.0/l 4.0 Effluent Disposal, Description of Method 4.0/1 5.0 Projeut Cost Estimate 5.0/l !:: :! 5.1 Regional Cost Estimate I - 5.2 Munici;al Cost Estimate 5.0/7 ··~ 5.3 Summary, Cost E::~tima te 5.0/12 1 4 - i 6.0/1 i-' 6.0 Project Schedule - - Contents ii Page_
7.0 Agreement of the Municipalities to implement the 7.0/1 proposed plan 7.1 Contractural Agreement 7.2 Resolutions of the Municipalities
8.0 Environmental Assessment (Furnished under separate cover by the (Environmental Assessment Council)
- 'L
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
l. Environmental Consultant: Environmental Assessment Council New Brunswick, New Jersey Environmental Assessment (furnished under separate cover)
2. Engineering Consultant: E. T. Killam Associates Millburn, New Jersey Sections on treatment works and alternative processes, sludge disposal method and estimated cost of the treat ment works
3. Borough Engineer: Donald M. Newman, P.E.
Sections on Infiltration/Inflow Evaluation Surveys for Avon-by the-Sea Borough and Neptune City Borough
4. Borough Engineer: Leon S. Avakian, P.E. Sections on Infiltration/Inflow Evaluation Surveys for Bradley Beach Borough and Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association. 1.0 Description of the Treatment Works and an Analysis of the Treatment Processes ~H 1- The proposed regional site of the Neptune treatment plant Ip- is located near the confluence of the Shark River and Jumping Brook. This site presently houses the tt·eatment plant which was built just a few years ago for the Towmahip of Neptune. When this site was
;j originally selected, adequate land area was acquired with the recognition 0;' i1 of the fact that expansion would be possible to serve contiguous areas
in the region at this plant site.
~e existing treatment plant is a biological secondary treatment
facility which provides primary settlin~high rate trickling filter,
final clarification and chlorine detention. The treated effluent is
pumped into a force main where it is discharged into the Atlantic Ocean.
The treatment plant presently removes about 85 percent.of the
suspended solids and BOD and, at the present time, is not up to the
full design.capacity which is approximately 2.5 MGD.
The sludge which is removed from tha primary and final clari-
fiers is heated and treated in the two-stage digestion facilities. The
digested sl~dge is dewatered on vacuum filters and the dewatered sludge
is buried in an approved sanitary landfill site.
The existing treatment plant is also provided with grit chamber
and metering facilities. The plant is in excellent condition and is
well maintained.
The plant is located in a heavily wooded area and cannot be L.
- 1.0/2
seen from the adjacent properties. Because of its location near the
Jumping Brook and Shark River in ~eptune Township, it is proposed·to use
the existing treatment plant and to provide additional facilities which
will increase the total plant capacity to about 9.0 MGD.
The proposed additions will be such that the existing units
will be kept in service and utili~ed during construction and upon completion
will be placed in dual operation with the new units. It is proposed to
add two new primary clarifiers, two new high rate trickling filters,
two new final clarifiers, as well as new primary and secondary digestion
facilities. In addition, it is planned to add new grit chambers and the
required pumping facilities and chlorine detention tank with the treated
effluent pumped through the existing outfall force main into the Atlantic
Ocean. In addition to the proposed new units, it is planned to construct
a stabilization basin. This basin will be 630 feet long times 430 feet
wide and will consist of approximately nine mechanically aerated units.
The objective of the stabilization basin is to provide a higher degree
of treatment than can be obtained from the high rate trickling filter,
to provide a more constant effluent quality, and to provide for uniform
pumping and uniform discharge of the treated effluent into the Atlantic
Ocean.
The layout of the units on the site is such that in the future
it will be possible to install additional treatment units, including
digestion facilities, primary clarifier, future trickling filter and
a future final clarifier. - 1.0/3
In the early studies made for this project, it had been planned
to consider the installation of mixed media filters so that approximately
2 million gallons per day of flow could be discharged into the Shark
River and Jumping Brook seasonally. This alternative was considered not
feasible in the environmental assessment, therefore it is not part of the
present regional plan selected. The location of these units is shown on
Plate I in the event they may be required in a later phase of this project.
A layout of the proposed new units on the site is shown on Plate I which
accompanies this report. The existing facilities which are presently
in use at this plant site are also shown. The flow through the plant will
essentially be through three basic sets of units, namely existing units,
and the two dual units which will be :lnstalled to parallel the existing
facilities.
An average daily flow of 2.5 MGD will pass through the first
unit, namely the existing facilities, and 2.5 MGD will pass through the
second set of units and 4.0 MGD will pass through the third set of
units.
The raw sewage will enter the plant through a 30 inch diameter
interceptor sewer, as well as force ~iins which will deliver the sewage
from existing plants, which are to be abandoned, into this new regional site. After comminution, the flow will pass through an 18 inch parshall I flume. This flume will have a capacity to measure a peak flow rate of
15.0 MGD. The flow will then split into three components. 2.5 MGD will
pass through the existing units passing through a grit chamber, thence the -
1.0/4
primary clarifier, the high rate tri.ckling filter, the final settling
tank and thence into a new stabilization basin. The existing primary
clarifier is 75 feet in diameter and has an 8 foot water depth. The
existing high rate trickling filter is 120 feet in diameter with a 7 foot
side water depth.
The final clarifier is 75 feet in diameter with a 9 foot
side water depth. The recirculation ratio is 1:1 which means that 2.5
MGD will be returned from the final clarifier and will join with the
primary effluent until a total of approximately 5 million gallons per
day rate will be applied on the high rate trickling filter.
Essentially the same flow rate will pass through the second
set of units and the same size units: will be provided, namely, the primary
clarifier is 75' in diameter by an 8 foot side water depth, the high rate
trickling filter is 120 feet in diameter by 7 foot side water depth and
the final clarifier is 75 feet in dlameter by 9 foot side water depth.
Thus, the existing unit and the second replacement or parallel unit will
treat a total of 5.0 MGD.
The third set of units will be designed to handle 4.0 MGD
average daily flow. This flow will pass through a primary clarifier
105 feet in diameter by 8 foot side water depth, thence into a high
rate trickling filter 185 feet in diameter by 7 foot side water depth
and thence into the final clarifier which is 105 feet in diameter by 9
foot side water depth.
The recirculation from the final clarifier back to the trickling r~- -
1.0/5
I ~· filter will be 5.0 MGD and this will provide an applied flow rate of about r 10 MGD upon the new high rate trickling filter.
The combined treated effluents from the three sets of units will
pass from the final clarifier into the new stabilization basin. This basin
will have a capacity of 8 million gallons and will provide a detention time
of approximately two days under an average daily flow of 9.0 MGD. The
treated effluent will be chlorinated and discharged through the force main
outfall sewer into the ocean for disposal.
The sludge which is removed from the three primary clarifiers
will be pumped into the digestion tanks for treatment. The sludge will be
heated utilizing the methane gas as the energy to generate the heat I source to maintain a digestion tank temperature in the primary units I of approximately 95 0 F. It is proposed to install one additional primary digestion tank 100 feet in diameter with a 35 foot side water depth to I compliment the existing 60 foot diameter primary digestion tank which has j, a side water depth of 18.5 feet. f I It is also proposed to add an additional secondary sludge ~ ' digestion tank 100 feet in diameter times 33 foot side water depth which will compliment the existing secondary sludge digestion tank which is
60 foot in diameter by 17 foot side water depth.
It is also proposed to install a second vacuum filter. This
vacuum filter will have 150 square foot in area and will supplement the
existing vacuum filter which has 125 square foot in area so that a total
of 275 square feet of vacuum filter capacity will be available.
The dewatered sludge will be conveyed to an approved sanitary 1.0/6
landfill site and the digested sludge will be buried and covered. This is the method of disposal presently employed. A schematic plan showing the flow diagram contemplated at this regional plant is shown on Plate
III which accompanies this report. This schematic diagram shows the approximate flow rates passing through the plant both under the average daily conditions and under the peak four-hour flow rate which has been determined to be 1.3 times the average daily flow.
The mixed media filters which are shown as appurtenant facilities for treating an average of 2.0 MGD with discharge into the river will not be installed at this time. A study has been made of alternative treatment processes to ascertain whether these would be effective and economical. The existing facilities which comprise secondary treatment utilizing bio filters, consist of only one set of units. It was not felt prudent to consider the installation of a parallel treatment process that would be different in principal and in concept. For example, if activated sludge were installed parallel to the existing treatment plant, the availability of dual facilities and the interchange of flow between units would be lost. In addition, plant personnel would have to be adept at operating both trickling filters as well as activated sludge.
The characteristics of the sludge would be quite different. The activated sludge is difficult to dewater, requires more digestion and generally more chemicals to provide satisfactory vacuum filtration. In addition, with the utilization of trickling filters, it will be necessary to provide compressors to generate the air,and it was determined that the power l.0/7
requirements would be far greater than trickling filters. B~ecause of the severe energy crisis, the saving of power is believed to be extremely im- portant in treatment.
It is recognized that activated sludge provides a final higher quality effluent than high rate trickling filters. On the other hand, with proper operation and proper maintenance, trickling filter plants have been known to provide effluents approaching the quality of activated sludge.
Because of the fact that the present personnel will remain and continue to operate the new additional enlarged facilities, it was felt
that the consideration of a second method, such as activated sludge, would not be a wise choice. Consideration was also given to the utilization of chemical treatment as well as biological treatment but here again
the flexibili.ty of dual operation would be lost. With chemical treatment
it would not be possible, for example, to divert the flow from the existing biological treatment plant into the chemical treatment facility without creating a severe overload. With the dual units proposed, any one or more units can be out for repair or maintenance and a bypass is arranged so that two or three primary tanks will always be in service.
Two or three trickling filters can always be in service, likewise, two of the three final tanks will be available in the event there is an outage of any one unit. The flexibility of operation for the treatment works as designed provides so many benefits that any alternative treatment process would only be considered a tremendous disadvantage in terms of constantly good effluent production, ease of operation, and economy in operation. 1.0/8
To assure that.a high quality effluent will be available at
all times, i t is proposed t o i nstall ~n aerat ed stabilization basin . This
basin will provide at least two, and generally about three , days of qui escent
settling and additional aeration with the result that further BOD and sus
pended solids removal can be provided. It would be possible to monitor the
effluent and to control the quality of the discharge into the ocean. It
will also be possible to regulate the flows so that there will not be a - peak rate discharge into the ocean and a more uniform discharge rate will be provided. As a matter of fact, it will be possible to control the
discharge so that during the summertime periods,discharge can be provided at
a higher rate in the evenings and a lesser rate in the daytime periods.
With the high degree of flexibility which has been incorporated - i n the proposed design of the basic treatment facility contemplated, the Authority will have one of the most efficient, effective treatment facili
ties in the shore area. I-
r
· C:.OMMINUTOI?. , i:.XI~TINC. OUTrALL. S!!.WilR I I .o PE.AI'. i'"OR OC.I:.A~ DISPO~~l. 18" PAR~HALL E. )( I '5> T I N 0! F"LUM~ - BY-PA~~ F"AC I L.l Tl C.:.. ':1 1~0 PE
' .. t It .0/14.9 l r--.. ,o.g ' ------.------!x~r--r------t--1 ~.c:,, C C.T. v----r-!.--!1~.\..., _..__ ~3.Q/l6-9 ._.. • ._.. N.C. ._.. Ill '---1-'-5-.0-.·-'-1 E-. _'J_. ~ . --- L_-{ ';;O" I NTE.RCt:.PTOI<. I___. N.O. S.t:.WE.R. t ' t Z :, Ri:.CI RC. NI:.W COMMI'-JUTOR TO INCOMINC., -~ ~ p ~ t-J INTLi.~C..t:.PTOR ~EWt:..R RAW ~L.. s. \.) r:. 11·0 1'1::.1.\K. !!.0/14 ~ ~t:.T. 0-0S ~E.MOVAL• I 0.01 t
NE.W SACKWA":>H DE.CI.\NT lANK R. P. '.:>. N C.W AE.i'tATE..D 'S>TABIL.I'Z:~TION POND NE.W f"'ACIL\TIE.";,< U/315 /F. C. :,::,, GOS T. F. :..:>/.;;.o~ z.s. ·~.;;,;, /.?.c. z.s.'.:; :.:. LE.GE.ND 75'-/ x 9' ~-.;....;;;.;.... ___-f I '20' ¢ X 7 ' 7':)¢ x 8' :a 1-1..:,. :.APA:::TY ( SI:.CTION l ') ._.. L,_J ._.. NE.W MIXI=:D t ( 2. bf-1"1'"' DIO.TI:.NTI0"-1) --- '\....._,_. \... --- Z.~::..z; Z 5 lv!C,D AY!;.R.AC.G. FLOW~:, '5MGD PE.A\"- 4HR.F'LOW MED:r., FILTE.~S. Rt:.. T. 5L.. GC- C,RIT CI-IAMI!o\O.R. ,,...... o.~ PC- PRIM.!\R.Y CL.AFlli-1~~ 2-5 RI<.C.IRC. t T F - '!'IC,iCI<.'-IN C, F'i"-TI<.fl. I"'C -F'INI.>,L. CL.A"IFI~R RIVE".R CIS.POE>AL l 'R,I>, W -::.L. RCT SL. --- PS - PUM Pii•..J c, STA'TIO "-1 VIA N I!.W OUT F"!.\I.L. v. --- RSMOVAL. o:: --1 ~-t=~~..-1 ___.: 4.~/:,.t 4.0::.. ,' =-·2 PD -PRIMARY OI:;.E.STE:.r.. "'"-....CX:J--...&...~---4 0.01 'Z. .0/: ._) 5> D - 5~CO N DAR Y .::JIC. ~ST ~"' a.o;z..o 13.0/IG ~ L------....1 "'V~-'1 - 1_1 VF - VI.\CUUM 1"1\...T~~ c,.c. F'uTU RC:. CCT -CHLORINt:. COloJT~C.T T-C)NK. c,.c.. RPS. • fi:C:.C.IRC:.UI..ATION PUMP. ~TATIOIV / NC - NORMALLY CcOSC:.D N 0 • NORMALLY OPt:.N I t / ~ CV -CONTROL. VALVt:.. FOR FI.OW Rt:.C.,ULATION N E.W ,_,,~: ~. 7; c'i> ) T.F RC. N 1:. W 1:> A C K. W.-:::, <;, H (~E.C.T lCHJ 1l) ') IO!:)¢ x e· HOLDINC., TANKS. t t ."<.AW SL. RST.SL. o.:, :-.J 0 T [;.. ';, : RE.M~Vf-IL 0-01 \.ALl. NUM~C:.R.S INOICATt:. F'LOW IN MC,D. z. PEAK 4 HR F'LOW AISSUMilD TO B~ I·~ liM'"-~ A"~ RAe,..;; n .. ow. I t
F'U TU Rr:. FACIL\TII:."::.
RAW ~L. R"-T. <;.L, IU.MOVA\... 0!:> 0.01
5E..WAGE.. FLOW DIAGRAM
'SLJPE.21\J. RG:T. 'T"O H€.AD OJ' PLANT 0.06 ~~w SLVDC,G:. • I F 101: 0 M P. C:.. o.os-t t
., "~I:: A. T ...... l ---- - :;, -.: C. ~I 1>1 N c, 1:. R I:XISTINC, f v.F· I"ACILITIC:.~ ,-----1 ItS F+- l------1 ! t t ' ---
I '!I ACRt:.C:. @ '3 pr .. CE.PTH
,. ,._, . ':: ... ( FUTURE. ] l
NEPTUNE REGIONAL SEWERAGE AUTHORITY
PRELIMINARY PLANS SLUDGE.. FLOW DIAGRAM • FLOW DIAGRAM
SOUTH BELMAR, N.J.
l'tofessional Engineers I Land Surveyors a Professional Plaaners I DESIGNED CJ0/'5JV CHECKEDOJ'b DATE BRIEF ELSON T. KILLAM ASSOCIATES, INC. 1-A-P-PR_o_v_E_D__ :...______D_A_TE_ta_/1=-/:..."TS-:--+--J.._R_E _V_I_S_I_O_N_S __ --1 /fydraulic an.cl San;iJa[y Ensineers ... e EssEx sTREET, MILLBuRN, NEw JERsEY o7o.,
CONTRACT JOI 15!>0 'T p
PLATE ill - - 2.0/1 2.0 INFILTRATION/INFLOW EVALUATION SURVEYS
2.1 Regional System Evaluation Survey:
The evaluation survey proposals below describe in detail the proposed methods and techniques to be used to determine the cost effectiveness of correction action.
In su~nary, the estimated costs are:
- Avon-by the-Sea $ 39,160.00 - Bradley Beach 55 ,000.00 - Ocean Gr·ove 128,000.00 Neptune City (Not Required) Neptune Township 256a394.oo -· TOTAL------$478,554-.00 -
-
- 2.0/2 2.2 Proposal for Sewer System Evaluation Survey In the Borough of Avon-by-the-Sea
Prepared by: Donald M. Newman Borough Engineer
INTRODUCTION This proposal details the plan for a systematic sewer system evaluation survey in the Borough of Avon-by the Sea.
The Infiltration/Inflow Analysis, Borough of Avon by-the-Sea, prepared by Donald M. Newman, Borough Engineer, demonstrated that certain areas of the Borough collector may be subject to excessive infiltration/inflow, and that correction of these conditions are cost effective.
The survey is to be performed in the areas of the Borough described in the subject report and described further herein. The particular locations of the sewers and the type of testing proposed for the survey are detailed, and the cost of the survey work estimated. 2.0/3 SURVEY DESCRIPTION
The portions of the collector sewer system that are proposed to be surveyed as described in the Infiltration/ Inflow Analysis consist of the following:
600 LF All of Poole Avenue 1200 LF Lincoln Lane from the Treatment Plant on Ocean Avenue to Second Avenue 2500 LF Garfield Lane from 1st Ave. to 5th Ave. 600 LF Roosevelt Ave. from 2nd Ave. to 3rd Ave. 2500 LF Norwood Ave. from 2nd Ave. to 5th. Ave. 2.0/4 Key Manhole Tests Critical manholes to isolate flows in these sewers are to be surveyed by the Key Manhole Test Procedure. Manholes to be tested are: MH at Jefferson and Poole MH on Lincoln Lane & 1st Ave. and at 2nd Ave to to gauge Flow Increase Along Pipeline MH on Garfield Lane & 1st Ave. and at 3rd Ave. MH at Roosevelt Ave. & 2nd Ave. MH on Norwood Ave. at 2nd Ave and at West End Ave. Visual Pipeline Inspection Visual pipeline inspection of sewers and manhole structures are to be performed at all available manholes on sewer routes described heretofor.
The results of the Key Manhole Tests and the Visual Pipeline Inspection will establish the sewers which will require televising and cleaning to locate points of significant infiltration.
It is expected that of the 7400 LF of sewer to be inspected, 3500 LF will require cleaning and televising. 2.0/5
Smoke Testing Smoke Testing is proposed to be carried out to pin point inflow locations of storm water from untrapped roof and foundation drains. Smoke testing also serves to locate breaks and joint openings in house connections which admit ground water infiltration.
Smoke testing is proposed for all the sewers between 5th Avenue and the Atlantic Ocean. It is proposed that 29,000 LF of sewer be smoke tested. \L
2.0/6
Borough of Avon-by-the-Sea ESTIMATE OF COSTS FOR SEWER SYSTEM EVALUATION SURVEY
... DESCRIPTION OF WORK: QUANTITY UNIT .AMOUNT Cellar Inspection for Illegal Sewer Man Connection 13 Days 80.00 $ 1,040. Key Manhole Inspection 7 Ea. 200.00 1,400. Visual Pipeline Inspection 7,400 LF .35 2,590. Smoke Test 29,000 LF . 22 6,380 . Clean & Televise 3,500 LF 3.50 12,250. Bypass Pumpage 10 Days 125.00 1,250. Subtotal $24,910.
Engineering Field Supervision and Direction 5,000. Engineering Data Analysis Report 3,000. Administrative and Clerical 1,250. Contingency for Emergency Sewer Failure Repairs During Cleaning 5,000. TOTAL $39,160. L. '-
2.0/7 SURVEY PROCEDURE Procedures for Evaluation Survey of infiltration/ inflow conditions in the sewer system area are developed herein. The procedures describe the systematic activities directed toward the location, quantifying and indicating corrective action to be taken to correct infiltration conditions. The procedures are also developed to locate and determine corrective action to be taken to eliminate inflow sources within the cost effective guidelines developed in the Infiltration/Inflow Analysis. Key Manhole Inspection Key manholes, described elsewhere herein are to be inspected, flow depths, invert elevation, grade eleva tion, to be taken and recorded.
Ground water elevations at these manholes are to be taken by ground water gauge cut through side of manholes or well points set behind curb.
Flow rates are to be established by methods outlined below depending on flow depth condition.
(a) Where flow depth is less than 0.3 pipe dia: Measure water surface, invert elevation, pipe. size at manhole and upstream manhole and calculate flow from hydraulic gradient. 2.0/8 Second, install weir and read depth of flow. Results should confirm each other in order of magnitude. (b) Where flow depth exceeds 0.3 pipe depth, but is less than full: Measure surface, invert and pipe diameter as above.
Second, place wood chip floats or dye in up stream manhole. Measure time for chips or dye to travel between manholes and calculate flow. Results should confirm each other. (c) Where flow depth exceeds pipe diameter,dye to be deposited at upstream manhole and velocity to be determined. Flow rate calculated from observed velocity and pipe size.
It is specifically noted that pipe must be relatively clear of debris or constrictions for hydraulic gradient method to be utilized to calculate flow. Before perform- ing any test, the pipe run is to be lamped to ascertain pipe interior condition. 2.0/9 - Visual Pipeline Inspection Visual pipeline inspection is performed for the pur pose of identifying sewer runs and manholes where excessive infiltration/inflow conditions occur.
Procedure for visual inspection consists of lamp ing sewers for structural condition, root or other obstruction. Sampling of sediment or deposition in sewer is to be made to determine if possible open or broken joints exist.
The inspection will be performed by visually inspect ing the manhole and pipeline starting at the downstream end and working back up the pipeline, as dictated by the flow in the system, to the next manhole.
A voice recording will be kept recording descrip ; - tions of all pertinent information as described above with stationing (exact locations) in relation to the center line between manholes. Polaroid pictures shall also be taken at all such points.
For the safety and welfare of all inspection personnel, devices such as exhaust and air supply equipment, gas masks, ropes, protective clothing, etc. of top quality shall be readily available for use as required.
,_ -
2.0/10 Data to be taken consists of: 1. Manhole entered - location and direction of sewer. 2. Distance between manholes along sewer 3. Size and type of sewer pipes. 4. Depth from top of manhole to sewer invert. (Rim Elev, Inv Elev) to NJGCS datum. 5. Structural conditions of sewer pipes and manholes including rings, covers, walls, steps, aprons and troughs. Note water mark elevation in mh. 6. Type and amount of deposition in sewers. 7. Root growth in sewers 8. Flow depth in each sewer and time of observation 9.. Location of visible sources of infiltration/inflow 10. Best cleaning method for sewer lines. 11. Special problems or conditions. 2.0/11 Smoke Test Procedure Purpose of the smoke test is to locate sources of inflow by observing smoke issuing from leaks and openings such as uncapped laterals, yard drain connections to house sewers,downspouts, foundation drains, etc.
Equipment to consist of portable smoke blower and
I five minute - 100,000 C.F. smoke bombs. f I ~' r Only after the sewer has been inspected in accordance ~ - with the Visual Pipeline Procedure, the smoke bombs and blower are to be used.
The location, quantity and density of smoke plumes found issuing from the ground, drains, house leaders, - etc. are to be noted, and color photographs are to be taken of same. 2.0/12 Televising of Sewers
Televising of sewers and attendant cleaning where other procedures heretofor described indicate that ex cessive infiltration/inflow exist will be performed to locate and determine the flow quantities and the methods of repair.
Preparatory Cleaning Cleaning shall be accomplished with mechanical and/ or hydraulic equipment. Mechanical equipment shall con sist of rodding and bucketing machine with buckets, brushes and scrapers. Hydraulic equipment shall consist of high pressure, low volume type equipment. No hydraulic equipment that would cause internal pressure or cause water/ sewage to 'back up' shall be permitted. Selection of equipment used shall be based on the condition of the lines at the time the work commences.
All pipelines will have sufficient foreign material removed to permit passage of a television inspection camera, and in no case shall foreign material in the pipe invert be permitted to remain to a depth of over one inch. Grease and other coatings which can be removed shall be removed until the remaining coating is less than one half inch thick.
1- 2.0/13 Where misalignment of pipe, dropped joints, structural failures, etc., are found, the location and nature of the failure shall be noted and cleaning equip ment carefully removed to preclude further damage.
All sludge, dirt, sand, gravel, grease and other debris resulting from the cleaning operations shall be removed. A suitable weir or dam shall be constructed in the downstream manhole in such manner that both solids and other materials shall be trapped.
During bucketing operations, a suitable container shall be provided to receive materials dumped from the buckets. No sewage or solids removed therefrom shall be dumped on the street or into ditches, catch basins or storm drains. All solids or semi-solids removed from the pipeline shall be removed from the site and disposed of in full compliance with the regulations of Local Regulatory Agencies.
Records shall be kept of all cleaning performed. These records shall be a printed form showing the date, manhole or pipeline section cleaned, section location, line size, length of section, type of cleaning tools used and any special remarks concerning the condition of the line. 2.0/14 Television Inspection
The inspection shall be by closed-circuit television and shall be performed in one section at a time. Sections shall be isolated from the remainder of the line by use of line plugs. Pipelines shall have flaws reduced to minimum during inspection.
The television camera used for the inspection shall be especially designed and constructed for pipeline inspection and shall have its own lighting system which shall produce light levels from 50-100 foot candles. Picture quality shall be such as to produce a continuous 600 line resolution picture showing the entire periphery of the pipe. To insure picture stability, the equipment used shall be constructed in such a manner as to with- stand shock and vibration.
Inspection record shall be kept which clearly shows the exact locations (stationing), in relation to the center line of the adjacent manhole, of each infiltra- tion point, each point or location of a service hub or connection or any other condition as required. Measure ment for these locations shall be made at ground level by means of a meter device. 2.0/15 Photographs from TV monitor, video and audio tape recording shall be made with each television inspection. The audio recording shall identify the run by lower and . . upper manhole or starting and ending point. Stationing . will be given by audio recording at all points of ~. interest and said points identified where possible. The stationing at the end of the run versus the ground measured distance from starting to ending points will be audio recorded. Continuous video recording is not required , but only at locations directed by the Engineer where infiltration/inflow sources are discovered.
The playback tape speed shall be not more than 12 ips on normal playback and shall have not less than 180 lines of resolution.
The video recorder shall have sound dubbing facilities that will permit audio track to be added to existing video recording.
Records of all television investigation performed shall include date, manhole and section location, line size, length of section, type of video equipment used and any specia 1 remarks concerning the condition of the line, and estimate of flow quantity entering the sewer at joints, services, etc. ~--- -- 1 2.0/16
2 • 3 BOROUGH OF BRADLEY BEACH INFILTRATION/INFLOW ANALYSIS By Leon S. Avakian, Borough Engineer
II-RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
It has been concluded in the earlier part of this report
that a system evaluation survey of the sewerage system in Bradley
Beach is warranted. The conduct of such a survey in accordance
with the rules, regulations and guidelines of the amended Water
Pollution Control Act as promulgated by the United States Envir-
onmental Protection Agency is outlined in this report.
Survey Procedure
1. Physical Survey
The following activities are included in this phase:
a. Interviews with local engineers and public works
officials involved with the municipal sewer system,
in order to develop a background and history of the
system and to obtain information on any corrective
work done, and its effects.
b. Division of the municipal sewer system into six
smaller service areas and the selection of a key man-
hole for each.
c. Extensive flow measurements at key manholes with sel-
ective installation of temporary flow metering equip-
ment.
d. Installation of ground water head checkers where in-
dicated. ,_ r:--
~- f- 2.0/17 l' e. Inspection of all accessible manholes and pipe lines
to determine structural condition, debris loading, signs
of infiltration or inflow sources in or adjacent to man-
holes, depth and appearance of flow at time of observa-
tion, best method of cleaning and any other special
problems.
2. Rainfall Evaluation and/or Simulation and Smoke Testing
Any areas where storm sewers are found crossing, or in close
proximity to the sanitary sewer or where sanitary sewers are
adjacent to water courses will be monitored during heavy rains
for signs of leakage or interconnections. In addition, where
required, these areas will be flooded with dyed water and mon-
itored for signs of leakage into the sanitary system. It is
anticipated however that many rainfall related inflow sources
can be located by means of smoke testing which will generally
reveal illegally connected down spouts, cellar and foundation
drains, catch basins as well as locating breaks in the sewer
pipes & house laterals as well.
3. Preparatory Cleaning
Those sections of the sewer system which the first 2 phases
of the survey indicate should be inspected by television,
will first be cleaned by methods determined in the physical
inspection phase to be appropriate to the particular con-
dition of each section to be televised. This work will be ......
2.0/18
performed either by municipal engineer's staff or by a
qualified sewer service contractor under the municipal
engineer's supervision. It is anticipated that all sections
to be televised will require some form of precleaning.
4. Internal Inspection
In this phase all sections of the system exhibiting serious
Infiltration/Inflow problems will be viewed by means of closed
circuit television camera. This inspection will be monitored
by specialists, all defects and their location will be logged,
video-taped and polaroid photos of the TV monitor will be taken to provide a permanent record. This inspection would normally I be conducted under high ground water conditions. 'i 5. Economic Analysis
The economic analysis presents the basis for decision on
rehabilitation. A detailed analysis for each faulty manhole
section, will be prepared. The percentage of total infilt-
ration for each section and the cost of rehabilitation by the
most economical method will both be estimated and this infor-
mation tabulated on summary sheets. Explanatory maps will
also be prepared.
A Cost effectiveness analysis will be prepared in order to
determine the economic justification for rehabilitation versus
transportation and treatment for each faulty manhole section.
,_ -
2.0/19
Report of Results of Survey Upon the completion of these 5 phases an engineering I' report with maps will be prepared. All faulty pipe sections
will be delineated and their priority for correction by the
most economical method will be rated on a cost effective basis.
The final report will develop an action program for correction,
with a time table and budget, and an expected quantity in-
filtration/inflow reduction.
Cost Estimates
The estimated costs for each of the five phases are as
follows:
Phase 1 Physical Survey 18,000.
Phase 2 Rainfall Simulation 5,000.
Phase 3 Preparatory Cleaning 8,000.
Phase 4 Internal Inspection 12,000.
Phase 5 Economic Analysis Evaluation Survey Cost 12,000.
$55,000.
It is anticipated that the study will require approx-
imately 18 weeks to complete if weather conditions permit. ". - 2.0/20
- The preliminary cost estimate for the construction of the
proposed facilities to connect the Bradley Beach sewerage system
- to the regional pumping station at the site of the p;esent
Neptune City wastewater treatment plant, is a follows:
@ $20.00 $62,000.00 12" A.C. Sewer Pipe 3,100 l.f. @ 600.00 4,200.00 Manholes 7 ea.
11 @ 15.00 54,000.00 Force Main, 6 dia. 3,600 l.f. s .y. @ 20.00 67,000.00. ?"~~-- Pavement Patching 3,350
i .... @ 20.00 20,000.00 Sheeting & Shoring 1,000 1. f. . - L.S. 25,000.00 r Pumping Station L.S. 5,000.00 Wet Well 20,000.00 Standby Generator L.S. - $ 25 7 ' 200 • 00 Contingency ...... 25,800.00
Engineering, Legal, administration costs ••••••••• 30,000.00 $313,000.00
f· t r . -
,-
-- .- ~ I t. '- ~. t 2.0/21 f 2. 4 OCEAN GROVE CAMP MEETING ASSOCIATION INFILTRATION/INFLOW ANALYSIS By Leon s. Avakian~ Association Engineer
II---RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
It has been concluded in the earlier part of this report,
that a system evaluation survey of the sewerage system in Ocean
Grove is required. The conduct of such a survey in accordance
with the rules, regulations and guidelines of the amended Water
Pollution Control Act as promulgated by the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency is outlined in this report.
Because no accurate sewer system maps are available and
the collection system was built with very few manholes, an eval-
uation survey cannot be conducted until a sewer system map is
prepared and manholes installed to permit access to the system.
Therefore, a three part program is proposed to accomplish the
survey as outlined below:
Part I - Exploratory Study
1. Locating riser pipes
The Ocean Grove sewer system was built using four inch diam-
eter riser pipes at intersections instead of standard manholes.
These riser pipes are inaccessible since they are below the
asphalt level. With the use of metal detection equipment, as
many riser pipes as possible will be located and uncovered,
so that a preliminary sewer system map can be produced. The
distance from ground level to invert at each riser will be
measured at this time. 2.0/22 - 2. Dying When a sufficient number of risers have been uncovered the
flow direction for the entire study area will be established
by means of dying techniques.
3. Mapping
Using the data obtained in this investigation, a preliminary
sewer system map will be produced. This map will show the
pipe locations, direction of flow, size of pipe, and invert
depths.
Part II - Installation of Manholes
From the information gathered in Part I, a determination of
the number of additional manhoies required and their location
will be made so that an effective sewer system evaluation can
be accomplished. Plans and specifications for the install-
ation of the required manholes will be prepared and supervision - of construction will be provided. Part III - Sewer System Evaluation Survey
1. Physical Survey
The following activities are included in this phase:
a. This phase also includes interviews with local engineers
and public works officials involved with the respective
municipal sewer systems, in order to develop a background
and history of each system and to obtain information on
any problems experienced in the past, as well as any cor-
rective work done, and its effects. , ' 2.0/23
b. Division of the municipal sewer system into smaller
service areas and the selection of a key manhole for
each.
c. Extensive flow measurements at key manholes with sel
ective installation of temporary flow metering equipment.
d. Installation of ground water head checkers where ind
icated.
e. Inspection of all accessible manholes and pipe lines
to determine structural condition, debris loading, signs
of infiltration or inflow sources in or adjacent to man
holes, depth and appearance of flow at time of Observation,
best method of cleaning and any other special problems.
2. Rainfall Evaluation and/or Simulation and Smoke Testing
Any areas where storm sewers are found crossing, or in close
proximity to the sanitary sewer or where sanitary sewers are
adjacent to water courses will be monitored during heavy rains
for signs of leakage or interconnections. In addition, where
required, these areas will be flooded with dyed water and mon
itored for signs of leakage into the sanitary system. It is
anticipated however that many rainfall related inflow sources
can be located by means of smoke testing which will generally
reveal illegally connected down spouts, cellar and foundation
drains, catch basins as well as locating breaks in the sewer
pipes & house laterals as well. - ..l
2.0/24
3. Preparatory Cleaning
Those sections of the sewer system which the first two phases
of the survey indicate should be inspected by television, will
first be cleaned by methods determined in the physical inspe-
ction phase to be appropriate to the particular condition of
each section to be televised. This work will be performed
either by the Association engineer's stall, or by a qualified
sewer service contractor under the Association engineer's
supervision. It is anticipated that all sections to be tele-
vised will require some form of pre-cleaning.
4. Internal Inspection
In this phase all sections of the system exhibiting serious
Infiltration/Inflow problems will be viewed by means of closed
circuit television camera. This inspection will be monitored
- by specialists, all defects and their location will be logged,
video taped, polaroid photos of the TV monitor will be taken
to provide a permanent record. This inspection would normally
be conducted under high ground water conditions.
5. Economic Analysis
The economic analysis presents the basis for decision on
rehabilitation. A detailed analysis for each fautlty man-
hole section, will be prepared. The percentage of total in-
filtration for each section and the cost of rehabilitation
by the most economical method will both be estimated and this
information tabulated on summary sheets. Explanatory maps
will also be prepared. I - t- .,..,.. .. ,~
2.0/25
A cost effectiveness analysis will be prepared in order
to determine the economic justification for rehabilitation
versus transportation and treatment for each faulty manhole
section.
Report of Results of Survey
Upon the completion of this three part program an engin-
eering report with maps will be prepared. All faulty pipe
sections will be delineated and their priority for correction
by the most economical method will be created on a cost eff-
~ ective basis. The final report will develop an action program t- for correction, with a time table and budget, and an expected quantity infiltration/inflow reduction.
Cost Estimates
Three separate cost estimates have been prepared, one
for exploratory study, one for manhole installation and one for
the sewer system evaluation study. I Part I - Exploratory Study & Preparation of Sewer Map $20,000. Part II - Manhole Installation 55,000.
Pat!t III - Evaluation Survey
Phase I - Physical Inspection $15 ,ooo.
Phase II - Rainfall Simulation 5,000.
Phase III - Preparatory Cleaning 10,000.
Phase IV - Internal Inspection 12,000.
Phase V - Economic Analysis 11,000.
$ 53,000. $53,000.
$128,000. - .- 2.0/26 ·- It is anticipated that Part I will take 16 weeks to com- plete and that Part III will require 19 weeks after the complet-
ion of Part II. However, an estimate of the duration of Part II
cannot be made until the conclusion of Part I.
The preliminary cost estimate for the construction of the
proposed facilities to connect the Ocean Grove sewerage system
and the Neptune Township Sewerage Authority pumping station on - Pennsylvania Avenue, is as follows: 18" A.C. Pipe 3000 l.f. @ $20.00 $60,000.00
Manholes 6 ea. @ 600.00 3,600.00
Special structure at present plant L.S. 10,000.00
Pavement Patching 1500 s.y. @ $20.00 30,000.00
Sheeting & shoring 1250 l.f. @ 20.00 25.000.00 $128,600.00
Contingency ...... 12,900.00 Engineering, leg: and administration costs...... 14,500.00 $156,000.00 ~ ' .. ~~: .. -
J. 2.0/27
2.5 Proposal for Sewer System Evaluation Survey In the Borough of Neptune City
Prepared by: Donald M. Newman Borough Engineer
No sewer system evaluation survey is proposed for the Borough of Neptune City.
The Infiltration/Inflow Analysis, Borough of Neptune City, prepared by Donald M. Newman, Borough Engineer, demonstrated that a survey is not needed.
Per capita wastewater flows were found to be stable. Heavy flows were found to vary irrespective of wet weather conditions and rainfall. -
\1 t.~, ""~~ - ~ f- 2.0/28
2.6 PROPOSAL FOR SEWER SYSTEM EVALUATION SURVEY TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE
Prepared by: Thomas W. Birdsall Township Engineer
INTRODUCTION
This proposal details the systematic sewer system survey plan for the Township of Neptune Sewerage Collection System and the estlmate of costs to perform the survey work. - The Infiltration/Inflow Analysis, Township of Neptune, prepared by Thomas W. Birdsall, Township Engineer, demonstrated that certain areas of the Township's eastern collector system may be subject to excessive infiltration/ inflow. The analysis further indicated that correction of these conditions are cost effective.
The infiltration/inflow survey is to be performed in the eastern collector system. The western collector system, as described in the analysis does not require survey and infiltration/inflow correction due to its exist- ing integr1 ty and minimum infiltration/inflow. 2.0/29
In the eastern system, the locations of the sewers and appurtenances to be surveyed, and the type of survey testing proposed, are detailed herein.
Survey Description:
The areas of the eastern collector system that are proposed to be surveyed are described herein and the particular survey work to be done in each of the areas ~ I detailed. The areas to be surveyed are those where signi- I ficant infiltration and/or inflow is considered to exist I as described in the Infiltration/Inflow Analysis. I I I The sewer survey procedures and locations to be surveyed are detailed as follows:
a.) Stamford to Mayfair Lane between Surrey Lane and Chadwell Court.
Clear flows found in the manhole at Mayfair and
Wakefield are indicative of basement drains and sump pump connections. Key manhole tests are to be performed in the manhole at Mayfair Lane and Wakefield Road and at Mayfair Lane and Brixton Place to isolate major infiltration/inflow sources.
t h.·,--- .. -
2.0/30
Visual pipeline inspection and concurrent smoke testing to be performed in all sewers in the area (5,000 LF). Cleaning and televising are expected to be needed in twenty percent (20%) of this area (1,000 LF).
b.) Corlies Avenue north to Heck Avenue between the New York and Long Branch Railroad and Ridge Avenue:
Urban renewal construction has left unplugged or uncapped abandoned sewers and house connections which admit infiltration in the low lying area. Sewers in this area are flowing full. Key manhole tests to be performed in manholes at:
Division Street and Prospect Avenue Embury Avenue and Prospect Avenue Silver Street and Division Street Heck Avenue and Prospect Avenue
Continuous bypass pumping will be required at all times during survey work in this area.
Visual pipeline inspection and smoke testing 1 ·,.]..i, are propoded to locate infiltration/inflow sources and uncapped shallow abandoned sewers and house services. ~~ I 2.0/31
It is expected that cleaning and televising of all sewers will be required to pinpoint infiltration sources for repair (6,600 LF).
c.) Seventh and Eighth Avenues from Railroad Avenue to New Jersey State Highway Route 35:
Sand deposits in manhole channels and sewage surcharge found in manholes. Key manhole tests to be per- formed at Seventh and Atkins Avenue, Eighth and Atkins Avenue. Continuous bypass pumping will be required at all times during survey. Visual pipeline inspection and smoke testing for all sewers is proposed (4,200 LF), cleaning and televising is expected to be necessary in most of these sewers (3,000 LF).
d.) Bingham and Sayre Street area:
The sewers in this area where a high ground water condition exists, manifold at the New Jersey State Highway Route 35 and Brockton Avenue lift station wet well. A key manhole test to be performed at this location. It is pro posed that inflow sources be located by visual pipeline inspection and smoke testing (1,700 LF). Cleaning and Ir ,_..... - ~' ... i,.~-; 2.0/32 I televising are expected to be necessary in 800 LF of 'J sewer in this area to pinpoint infiltration/inflow I sources. ~
e.) Fisher Avenue west to New Jersey Route 35 I between Springwood Avenue and Bangs Avenue: ··~ ~ Heavy concentrations of sand are found in these )II; sewers. The area has also undergone redevelopment, and 1'5; it is considered probable that uncapped abandoned house I services are major infiltration sources. ~. Key manhole survey procedures are to be performed in manholes at: I Fisher Avenue and Springwood Avenue I".iif Springwood Avenue and New Jersey State Highway 35 l.. Milton Avenue and Drummond Avenue Columbus Avenue and Drummond Avenue Bangs Avenue and New Jersey State Highway 35
This is to isolate major flow sources in this area.
Visual pipeline inspection will be performed at· manholes throughout the area concurrent with smoke testing ( 7, 0 0 0 LF) . Cleaning and televising all sewers in this 2.0/33
I: ~ area is expected to be necessary to locate infiltration sources through joints and open pipe.
f.) Fordham Road and Eaton Way:
Sewers here are considered to be cracked and infiltrating due to their depth and history of failed sewers in the area. Clean and televise all sewers in this area to locate failed sewers. History of sewer failures makes preliminary testing unnecessary (3,000 LF).
g.) Wakefield Road:
The Wakefield Road trunk sewer has been found to have significant sand deposits. Sewers on streets leading into Wakefield have gross sewage color indicating ground water infiltration.
Key manhole tests to be performed in manoles on Wakefield Road at New Jersey State Highway 33, at Harrow Court, and 375 feet north of Edgeware Place to isolate flows.
Visual inspection and smoke tests of all sewers to be performed (3,500 LF). It is expected that cleaning and televising of 1,000 LF will be required.
ivl ~- - ~.J
2.0/34
h.) Heck Avenue from Fisher Avenue west to New Jersey State Highway 35 and adjacent Greenwood Ave nue and Drummond Avenue:
Sand, clear water flows and roots have been found, all indicating significant infiltration into these sewers.
Key manhole test to be performed on Heck Avenue at Springdale Avenue and New Jersey State Highway 35 and in the manhole at Springwood Avenue and New Jersey State
Highway 35 to isolate primar~ flow areas.
Visual pipline inspection and smoke testing to be performed in all sewers (6,000 LF). It is expected that all the sewer will require cleaning and televising.
i.) Corlies Avenue south to Sixth Avenue, between Union Avenue and Springdale Avenue:
Sewers are surcharged and sand concentrations found (10,200 LF).
Survey in this area requires bypass pumping to temporarily reduce surcharge condition. Flow tests in key manholes are to be performed before bypass pumping so that present relief sewer flow conditions are maintained
. - ._····-·-
2.0/35
in a steady state. Key manhole tests are to be made in
the manholes at:
Union Avenue and Eighth Avenue Sixth Avenue and Hamilton Avenue Taylor Avenue and Lakeview Avenue Corlies Avenue and Hawthorne Avenue
The key manholes tests will isolate major infiltration/ inflow sewer sources in this area.
Smoke testing of all sewers, when pumped down is proposed to locate inflow sources (10,200 LF). Visual pipeline inspection of accessible sewers and manholes to be performed followed by cleaning and televising of an estimated 5,000 LF of sewers in this area.
1- -
2.0/36
ESTIMATE OF COSTS FOR SEWER SYSTEM EVALUATION SURVEY:
Unit Description of Work Quantity Price Amount Cellar Inspection for Illegal Sewer Connection 60 Man Days 80.00 $ 4,800.00 Key Manhole Inspection 25 UN 200.00 5,000.00 Visual Pipeline Inspection 44,200 LF 0.35 15,470.00 Smoke Test 44,200 LF .22 9,724.00 Clean and Televise 33,400 LF 3.50 116,900.00 Bypass Pumpage 60 Days 125.00 72500.00 Subtotal------$159,394.00
- Engineering, Field Supervision and Direction------30 ' 000 .00 Engineering Data Analysis Report------19 ' 000 . 00 Administrative and Clerical------8 ' 000 . 00 Contingency for Emergency Sewer Failure Repairs During Cleaning------40 , 000 . 00
TOTAL------$256,394.00
- -
2.0/37
SURVEY PROCEDURES:
Procedures for Evaluation Survey of infiltra-
tion/inflow conditions in the sewer system area are developed herein. The procedures describe the systematic activities directed toward the location, quantifying and indicating corrective action to be taken to correct infiltration conditions. The procedures are also devel- oped to locate and determine corrective action to be taken to eliminate inflow sources within the cost effective
guidelines developed in the Infiltration/Inflow Analysis. - Key Manhole Inspection: Key manholes, described elsewhere herein are to be inspected, flow depths, invert elevation, grade eleva- tion, to be taken and recorded.
Ground water elevations at these manholes are to be taken by ground water gauge cut through side of manholes or well points set behind curb.
Flow rates are to be established by methods out lined belcw depending on flow depth condition. -- l - - - 2.0/38 a.) Where flow depth is less than 0.3 pipe diameter -Measure water surface, invert elevation, pipe size at manhole and upstream manhole and calculate flow from hydraulic gradient. Second, install weir and read depth of flow. Results should confirm each other in
order of magnitude.
b.) Where flow depth exceeds 0.3 pipe depth, - but is less than full: Measure surface, invert and pipe diameter as above.
Second, place wood chip floats or dye in upstream manhole. Measure time for chips or dye to travel between manholes and calculate flow. Results should confirm each - other. c.) Where flow depth exceeds pipe diameter, dye to be deposited at upstream manhole and velocity to be determined. Flow rate calculated from observed velocity and pipe size.
It is specifically noted that pipe must be rela- tively c:ear of debris or constrictions for hydraulic gradient method to be utilized to calculate flow. Before performinf any test, pipe run to be lamped to aGcertain pipe interi0r condition. 2.0/39
Visual Pipeline Inspection:
Visual pipeline inspection is performed for the purpose of identifying sewer runs and manholes where excessive infiltration/inflow conditions occur.
Procedure consists of lamping sewers for struc- tural condition, root or other obstruction. Sampling of sediment or deposition in sewer to determine if possible open or broken joints exist.
The inspection will be performed by visually inspecting the manhole and pipeline starting at the down- stream end and working back up the lines as dictated by the flow in the system to the next manhole.
A voice recording will be kept recording descrip- tions of all pertinent information as described above with stationing (exact locations) in relation to the center line between manholes. Polaroid pictures shall also be taken at all such points.
For the safety and welfare of all inspection personnel, devices such as exhaust and air suppLy equipment, gas masks, ropes, protective clothing, etc. of top quality - 2.0/40
shall be readily available for use as required.
Data to be taken consists of: 1. Manhole entered - location and direction of sewer. 2. Distance between manholes along sewer. 3. Size and type of sewer pipes, 4. Depth from top of manhole to sewer invert. (Rim elevation, invert elevation) to NJGCS datum. 5. Structural conditions of sewer pipes and manholes including rings, covers, walls, steps, aprons and troughs. Note water make elevation in manhole. 6. Type and amount of deposition in sewers. 7. Root growth in sewers. 8. Flow depth in each sewer and time of observation. 9. Location of visible sources of infiltration/inflow. 10. Best cleaning method of sewer lines. 11. Special problems or conditions.
I- 2.0/41
Smoke Test Procedure:
Purpose of test is to locate sources of inflow by observing smoke issuing from leaks and openings such as uncapped laterals, yard drain connections to house sewers. downspouts, foundation drains, etc.
Equipment to consist of portable smoke blower ... and five minute - 100,000 C.F. smoke bombs.
Only after the sewer has been inspected in accordance with the visual pipeline procedure, smoke bombs and blower are to be used.
The location, quantity and density of Rmoke plumes found issuing from the ground, drains, house leaders, etc. are to be noted, and color photographs are to be taken of same. 2.0/42
Televising of Sewers:
Televising of sewers and attendant cleaning
where other procedures heretofor described indicate that excessive infiltration/inflow exist will be performed to locate and determine the flow quantities and the methods
of repair.
- Preparatory Cleaning:
Cleaning shall be accomplished with mechanical arid/or hydraulic equipment. Mechanical equipment shall consist of rodding and bucketing machine with buckets, ·- brushes and scrapers. Hydraulic equipment shall consist of high pressure, low volume type equipment. No hydraulic equipment that would cause internal pressure or cause
water/sewage to 'back up' shall be permitted. Selection of equipment used shall be based on the condition of the lines at the time the work commences.
All pipelines will have sufficient foreign mater ial removed to permit passage of a television inspection camera, and in no case shall foreign material in the pipe invert be permitted to remain to a depth of over one inch 2.0/43
(1"). Grease and other coatings which can be removed shall be removed until the remaining coating is less
than one half inch (~") thick.
Where misalignment of pipe, dropped joints,
structural failures, etc., the location and nature of the failure shall be noted and cleaning equipment carefully removed to preclude further damage.
All sludge, dirt, sand, gravel, grease and other debris resulting from the cleaning operations shall be removed. A suitable weir or dam shall be constructed in
the downstream manhole in such manner that both solids and other materials shall be trapped.
During bucketing operations, a suitable container shall be provided to receive materials dumped from the ::{ buckets. No sewage or solids removed therefrom shall be dumped on the street or into ditches, catch basins or storm drains. All solids or semi-solids removed from the pipeline shall be removed from the site and disposed of in full compllance with the regulations of Local Regulatory Agencies. 2.0/44
Records shall be kept of all cleaning per formed. These records shall be a printed form showing the date, manhole or pipeline sections cleaned, section location, line size, length of section, type of cleaning tools used and any special remarks concerning the condition
of the line.
Television Inspection:
The inspection shall be by closed circuit tele v1sion and shall be performed in one section at a time. Sections shall be isolated from the remainder of the line by use of line plugs. Pipelines shall have flows reduced to a minimum during inspection.
The television camera used for the inspection shall be especially designed and constructed for pipeline inspection and shall have its own lighting system which
shall produce light levels from 50-100 foot candles. Pic
ture quality shall be such as to produce a continuous 600 line resolution pictures showing the entire periphery of the pipe. To insure picture stability, the equipment used shall be constructed in such a manner as to withstand stock and vibration.
- 2.0/45
Inspection record shall be keDt which clearly shows the exact locations (stationing), in relation to the center line of the adjacent manhole, of each infil tration point, each point or location of a service hub or connection or any other condition as required. Mea surement for these locations shall be made at ground level by means of a meter device.
Photographs from TV Monitor, video and audio tape recording shall be made with each television inspection. The audio recording shall identify the run by lower and upper manhole or starting and ending point. Stationing will be given by audio recording at all points of interest at the end of the run versus the ground mea sured distance from starting to ending points will be audio recorded. Continuous video recording is not required, but only at locations directed by the Engineer where infiltration/inflow sources are discovered.
The playback tape speed shall be not more than 12 ips on normal playback and shall have not less than 180 lines or resolution.
The video records shall have sound dubbing facil ities that will p~rmit audio track to be added to existing video recording. 2.0/46
Records of all television investigation per- formed shall include date, manhole and section location, line size, length of section, type of video equipment
used and any special remarks concerning the condition of the line, and estimate of flow quantity entering the sewer at joints, services, etc .
. -
-
i 1,• - ......
3.0/1
3.0 A Description of the Method of Sludge Disposal Selected
The method of sludge disposal has hereinbefore been described.
Basically, raw sludge which is removed from the primary and final clarifiers
will be pumped into the digestion tanks. The sludge will be heated to
0 90 to 95 F and will be retained in the two digestion tanks for a period
of approximately thirty days. Two-stage digestion is contemplated, The
first stage will provide a detention period of about fifteen days and this
stage will provide a sludge that is heated and vigorously mixed following
the retention of the sludge and the heating of the sludge in the first
stage.' The sludge is then transferred into the secondary digestion tank
where·quiescent settling is provided to concentrate the sludge. ·The sludge will
be thickened by decantation with supernatant withdrawn from the secondary tank. The
digested sludge is expected to be about 92 percent moisture and 8 percent
solids with a volatile reduction of approximately 55 percent.
The sludge will then be pumped into the vacuum filter building where
the sludge will be dewatered.
In order to prepare the sludge for dewatering, lime and ferric
chloride will be employed. These chemicals will be fed to the digested
sludge which will then be conveyed on to the vacuum filter for dewatering.
Following sludge dewatering--in which the cake will have a moisture content
of about 55 to 60 percent, the sludge will then be trucked on to a sanitary
landfill site for disposal. The digested sludge will be covered each day
when it is delivered to the site.
It is anticipated that the dewatered process will be continued .... approximately three days per week in the early stages of the operation
;~. of the facilities. As the flow and sludge increases, units will be ' - 3.0/2
\ -
operated four days and eventually five days a week; Sludge will be conveyed in
trucks to an approved sanitary landfill site where the digested sludge
will be buried in an approved manner. This has been the practice in the
past in the handling of digested sludge from the existing treatment
facilities. 4.0/l
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF EFFLUENT DISPOSAL SELECTED (TO BE FURNISHED AT A LATER DATE)
- 5.0/l
5.0 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
5.1 Construction Cost:
Assuming contracts advertised in July 1974.
5.1.1 Expansion of Sewage Treatment Plant:
1. Revision to Existing Facilities
a.) Chlorine Contact Tank Modification $ 18,000.00
b.) Pumping Station Modification 60,000.00
c.) Vacuum Filter Building Modifications 180,000.00
d.) Associated Site Work 30,000.00
e.) Associated Site Pumping 60,000.00
Sub Total------348,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal & Engineering, 20%------69,600.00 TOTAL------$417,600.00
2. New 2.5 MGD Facility
a.) Grit Chamber 54,000.00
b.) Comminutor 30,000.00
c.) Primary Clarifier 102,000.00
d.) Trickling Filter 150,000.00
~.) Re-circulating Pump Station 48,000.00
f.) Final Clarifier 1082000.00 Sub Total------$492,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal & Engineering, 20%------98 2400.00
mt> AT 3. New 4.0 MGD Facilit~ a.) Grit Chamber $ 72,000.00 b. ) Low Lift Pumping Station 120,000.00 c . ) Primary Clarifier 168,000.00 d. ) Trickling Filter 336,000.00 e. ) Re-circulating Pump Station 96,000.00 f. ) Final Clarifier 180,000.00 Sub Total------$ 972,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal & Engineering, 20%------194,400.00 TOTAL------$1,166,400.00 4. New Stabilization Pond a.) Stabilization Pond (9.0 MGD) $ 840,000.00 b.) Outfall Pumping Station 600,000.00 Sub Total------$1,440,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------$ 288,000.00 TOTAL------$1,728,000.00 5. New Digestion Facilitief a.) T~nks and Equipment Sub Total------$1,200,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------240,000.00 TOTAL------$1 ' 440 ' 000 . 00 5.0/3 /" 0. Site PiQing Sub Total------$ 720,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, t Legal, Engineering, 20%------$ 144,000.00 - .. TOTAL------$ 864,000.00 7 . Site Work Sub Total------2,280,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------$ 456.zOOO.OO TOTAL------$ 2,736,000.00 8. Electrical Sub Total------ 480,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------96,000.00 TOTAL------$ 576,000.00 9. Heating and Ventilating Sub Total------ 120,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, ,Legal, Engineering, 20%------$ 24,000.00 TOTAL------$ 144,000.00 GRAND TOTAL------$ 9 ' 662 ' 400 . 00 ! . 5.0/4 5.1.2 Regional Pumping Station, Laird Avenue: Underground Structure $ 90,000.00 Building and Site Work 42,000.00 Mechanical, pumps, motors, piping 100,000.00 Electrical, control, power, metering 95 1 000.00 Sub Total------$327,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------65,000.00 TOTAL------$~92,000.00 5.1.3 Regional Force Main, Laird Avenue to Existing Manifold at Shark River Hills: Unit Descri,2tion Quantit;y Price Amount 24" D. I. Pipe 8,440 LF 40.00 $337,600.00 Fittings 15,900 LB 0.75 11,925.00 NJSH #35 Jacking l UN 10,000.00 River Crossing, Shark River l UN 25,000.00 Sub Total------$384,525.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------76,905.00 TOTAL------$461,430.00 c- i 5.0/5 5.1.4 REGIONAL OCEAN OUTFALL EXTENSION: (To be furnished at a later date) ... 5.C/6 5.1.5 REGIONAL ACQUISITIONS: Township of Neptune Treatment Plant $513,034.68 Township of Neptune Force Main: Shark River Hills to Treatment Plant 120,312.40 In Railroad Avenue 112,000.00 Additional Land and R.O.W. 's 1,200.00 ~865,347.08 5.1.6 SPECIAL SERVICES: Environmental Consultants $ 32,000.00 Soil Consultant 30,000.00 Soil Borings 36,000.00 $ 98,000.00 • ~ I~ i - "" - 5.0/7 5.2 Municipal Treatment Plant Conversions and Force Mains: 5.2.1 Avon Treatment Plant Conversion: Structural $ 16,000.00 Mechanical, equipment, piping etc. 38,000.00 Electrical, control, generator, power 35 1 000.00 $ 89,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------17,800.09 Sub Total------$106,800.00 5.2.2 Avon Force Main: Unit DescriJ2tion Quant it~ Price Amount 12" D.I. Pipe 5,600 LF 18.00 $101,430.00 Fittings 3,000 LB 0.75 2,250.00 12" C.I. Pipe 350 LF 6.00 2,100.00 Jacking, New York & Long Branch RR LUMP SJM 25,000.00 $130,780.00 Contingencies, Administrative Legal, Engineering, 20%------26,157.00 Sub Total------$156,937.00 AVON TOTAL------$263,937.00 5.0/8 5.2.3 Bradley Beach Treatment Plant Conversion: Pumping Station $ 25,000._00 Wet Well 5,000.00 Stand-by Generator 20~000.00 $ 50,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------10,000.00 Sub Total------$ 60,000.00 5.2.4 Bradley Beach Force Main: Unit Description Quantity Price Amount 12" A.C. Sewer Pipe 3,100 LF 20.00 $ 62,000.00 Manholes 7 UN 600.00 4,200.00 Force Main, 6" 3,600 LF 15.00 54,000.00 Pavement Patching 6'{,000.00 Sheathing and Shoring 20,000.00 $207,200.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------41,400.00 Sub Total------$248,600.00 BRADLEY BEACH TOTAL------$308,600.00 - 5.0/9 5.2.5 OCEAN GROVE: Unit Description Quantity Price Amount Treatment Plant Structure $ 10,000.00 18" A.C. Pipe 3,000 LF 20.00 60,000.00 Manholes 6 UN 600.00 3,600.00 Pavement Patching 1,500 SY 20.00 30,000.00 Sheathing and Shoring 1,250 LF 20.00 25l000.00 $128,600.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------25,700.00 TOTAL------$153,300.00 5.2.6 NEPTUNE CITY: Conversion of Treatment Plant Structural $ 12,000.00 Mechanical and Piping 31,000.00 Electrical 18~000.00 $ 61,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, I Legal, Engineering, 20% 12.200.00 TOTAL------$ 73,200.00 l 5.0/10 5.2.7 NEPTUNE TOWNSHIP: Conversion of Treatment Plant #l Structural $ 17,000.00 Mechanical, equipment, piping, pumps, etc. 91,000.00 Electrical, power, control, generator, etc. 43,000.00 $151,000.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------30,200.00 SDB TOTAL------$181,200.00 FORCE MAIN, TREATMENT PLANT TO RAILROAD AVENUE: Unit Description Quantit;y Price Amount - c'4" D. I. Pipe 1,925 LF 40.00 $ 77,000.00 F'ittings 3,000 LB 0.75 2,250.00 Jacking, N.Y.& C.B. R.R. LUMP SUM 15,000.00 $ 94,250.00 Contingencies, Administrative, Legal, Engineering, 20%------18~850.00 Sub Total------$113,100.00 TOTAL------$294,300.00 \. 5.0/ll 5.2.8 MUNICIPALITIES SUMMARY: Avon-by the-Sea $ 263,937.00 Bradley Beach 308,600.00. Ocean Grove 153,300.00 Neptune City 73,200.00 Neptune Township 294,300.00 MUNICIPAL TOTAL------$1,093,337.00 f- ...... -~-" 5.0/12 I 'w 5.3 ESTIMATED COST SUMMARY: Regional Facilities $10,515,830.00 Regional Acquisitions 865,347.08 Special Services 98 4 000.00 Sub Total------ $11,479,177.08 Municipal Facilities------ 1,093,337.00 Infiltration/Inflow Evaluation Surveys------478,554.00 TOTAL------$13,05i,o68.o8 ,_ 6.0/l 6. 0 PROJECT IMP~J>.:"F.i'~ u: :. ON SCHEDULE: 6.1 Jnly 15, Preliminary D~Jign of Regional Facilities to New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection (completed) G.2 lJovernber '(., lj73 Wastewater Management Plan, Section I to New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection (completed) -, r 6.3 December _! \) ' 1973 'vhJ:·t:ewater Management Plan, Section II to New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection (completed) 6.4 December L3, 1973 RecPive bids, soil borings 6.5 December ~1, 1973 Effluent Disnosal Section of 6.3 to New J~rsey Dept. of Environmental Protection 6. 6 January 4, 1974 Authorize Final Design, Start on Expanded Treatment Works 6.7 January 18, 1974 Preliminary Design of Municipal Fac~lities to New Jersey Dept. of Er.vjronmental Protection 6.8 PeLruary 1, 1974 Project Report to New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection 6.9 February ·'l, 19'14 Receive Soil Engineering Report on Stabilization Pond Location 6.10 February 1974 Authorize Final Design of Regional Force Main, Regional Pumping Sta tion, Regional Ocean Outfall and Municipal'Fa6ilities . . 6.11 May 15, 1974 Submit all Final Design and Specifications, Technical Design Report and State and Federal Grant Applications to New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection ·- 6.0/2 6.12 June 30, 1974 Receive Design Approvals and Grant Committmentr: from New Jersey Department of Environ mental Protection and United States Environmental Protection Agency 6.13 August 15, 1974 State and Federal Agen(:.ies Complete Review of Contr'act Plans and Specificatj, m3 6.14 November 15, 1974 Award Construction Contr·acts 6.15 IJovember 15, 1976 C>:mp1ete Construction and Begin lr.eration of FacilitieG 7. 0/1 7. 0 Agreement o ::' ·;he ~!unic ipali ties to Implement the Proposal p_;ar~ 7.1 Contractual ft~reement (following page~) 7.2 Resolut.ions (following pages) '- - - l1 _, I ' ' ' I I' A G R E E M E N T This Agreement made this 11th day of April 1973,:' .. I ... , between the Township of Neptune Sewerage Authority a public . I body, duly created pursuant to R.S. 40:14A-l et seq . ..,, :! hereinafter referred to as 11 Authority" and the Ocean Grove I,,, il Camp Meeting Association of the United Methodist Church, '·I ! ll the Borough of Bradley Beach, a municipal corporation of the - ti i State of New Jersey, the Borough of Avon-by-the-Sea, a !' municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey, the Borough·. '' of Neptune City, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey,and the Township of Neptune in the County of :· .. Monmouth, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey , I' ;: (hereinafter each and severally referred to as "municipality" :' .... 0 I• : or collectively as "municipalities .. ). !: ,. WITNESSETH: ~ i· RECITALS '• I 1. Neptune Township has heretofore constructed a It ,, Secondary Sewerage Treatment Plant known as Neptune Water , Pollution Control Plant No. 2, Outfall Line, and Ocean Outfall.: I' 2. The parties to this Agreement are_located wholly ·:'· or partially in the natural drainage limits of Shark River " ·· and its tributaries together with the coastal communities ': that naturally drain to Sunset, Wesley, Fletcher and Sylvan • Lakes and Shark River . pI. ,,I 3. The parties hereto are desirous of abating the ;: pollution in and about the waters of said municipalities. ! '· I' II - III' :l I li I .II l r.I I li 4. The parties hereto are desirous of effectuatin~ ll I 1l the abatement of pollution for the least cost to the users q I . !I within their municipality. I 'I I·~· 5. The Neptune Area Regional Water Pollution •· !· Control Study Committee has caused its consulting engineer, II Howard c. Birdsall, to prepare a Regional Water Pollution !j.. Con t ro l Feas~ 'b ~' J. ~ty' S tu d y an d Repor t f or the Nep t une Ar ea, II 1; dated June 11, 1968, which Report has been approved by the ;i • !jNew Jersey State Department of Health, and as shown op the !i ji plan entitled "Proposed Sewerage Facilities Neptune Regional i' i • lt Sewer Study Plan", attached hereto and made a part hereof, .•..:. ~ il . !!hereinafter referred to ~s Schedule A. The construction l• II provided for hereunder, both by the Authority and the munici-~ 11 palities, hereinafter shall be referred to as "the project". I ,. ;1 6. Authority and each municipality recognize the j - .. tl desirability and necessity of the project and each municipal- f· li ity recognizes economic advantages, to wit~ a regional treat- I .. ;,ment of waste water. Accordingly, the parties desire to pro- 1 1! vide for and agree to the several terms and provisions herein! I 11 contained. ·- 'IL . II AGREEMENT 'I I· Now, therefore, the parties hereto, ·in consideratidn l I 1 of the mutual covenants herein contained, hereby agree, each I II intending to be legally bound, as follows: 1 - i' I. ~sting Facilities, Construction•of Project,- I ' ljTrea~~-o~f~S~~=a~g~~e~,~O~p~e~r~a~t~i~o~n~o~f~F~a~c~i=l=i~t=i~e~s~a=n~d~R;e~s~e~r~v~a~t~1~·o~n I j! 9f caeacity. . 1 1/ Section 1.01: Facilities to be conveyed bY Township of f J! Neetune in the Count~ of Monmouth to the Authoritx. I ..,! 1. Neptune Township has conveyed title to the II 'I !tAuthority the following sewerage facilities: J \1 I /! I ll 2 I ii I I II l ' I· ,.. I' ' .- I !i II II'I II real estate now owned by Neptune Township located on Old !I Corlies Avenue, Neptune Township, New Jersey. .• IIt p. (B) ocean outfall with a diameter of 24" and a I I II I !! capacity of 6.50 M.G.D. extending from WateT Pollution controa \I .. li Plant No. 2 to a point 1,200 feet beyond the high wa~er mark ·• I. I. ii !I in the Atlanti~ Ocean, located generally between Bradley I! II Beach and Avon-by-the-Sea .. jl l l • I·; !I (C) Regional Force Main for Shark River Hills :t t I; Final Pumping Station to Water Pollution Control Plant No. 2,1 I • J ii l which is to be constructed by Neptune Township as Neptune I II I ;I Township's Shark River Hills Sewerage Project is c.onstruct~d .I li I i I! This regional force main is to be conveyed to Authority fre~ i II,, I I ~ and clear of all liens and encumbrances and to be paid for I !j I; I',I by Authority at Neptune Township's actual cost of constructi~ ~ I fl II'I including all costs relating thereto. ·' 'I 2. It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that by the conveyance by Neptune Township of the "11 ;I,, Treatment Plant as set forth in Section 1.01 (A) to the I!,, ,,I Authority that Neptune Township has a reservation in the II existing treatment plant facilities of the Authority to a capacity of 4.3 M.G.D. To the extent of that reservation ,. I - ' ,/ of capacity in the existing treatment plant, Neptune Townshi~ jl ! - will not be required to pay any capital cost as calculated i~ ,I I I' I il -3- I·I ·I I I! I II I I II I 'I I• i ,.it I jl j I Il . - ,, '· !' i '· I' ',.II i the service charge since the conveyance to the Authority was ,I without consideration. Neptune Township is to be paid for !' that portion of the capacity of the treatment facilities in I :excess of 4.3 M.G.D. as set forth in Section 1.01 paragraph ,.I :. 2- (b) below. ,, (a) It,is agreed by and between the parties hereto ; that by the conveyance by Neptune Township of the said out fall line as set forth in Section 1.01 (lB) to the ~uthority i :. that Neptune Township has a reservation in the Ocean outfall i· of the Authority to a capacity of 4.3 M.G.D. . To the extent ., i of that reservation of capacity in the existing Ocean outfall. ~ I !·Neptune Township will not be required to pay any capital .or '· \ ~- cost as calculated in the service charge, since the conveyance .,, '; to the Authority was without consideration. Neptune Township - ~ is to be paid for that portion of the capacity of the Ocean ,; !, outfall in excess of 4.3 M.G.D. as set forth in Section 1.01 •· .. 'paragraph 2- (b) below . •'' (b) The Authority shall pay the sum of $513,034.68 ,. to Neptune for the capacity in excess of 4 . .3 M.G.D. in the Ocean outfall, real estate and treatment facilities to be >used by others. This sum shall be paid for on an installment . : basis, in accord~nce with the amounts and due dates set forth ·' I· •: in Schedule B attached hereto and made a pa~t hereof. 1 ' Section l. 02: Authority to Construct Certain Parts of Project and Operate Regional Facilities. 1. Authority shall, to the extent that the same -4- ...'· ., I ... . ~· . . , - ~.·.. Il I I I . ,.~ II has not already been accomplished, cause the completion of .' j plans and specifications for the Regional Facilities and l It thereafter proceed to construct the regional facilities of i r.I ·the project in accordance with such plans and specifications Ii !I and in compliance with the requirements of all governmental I ~! agencies having j ur isd ict ion in the rna tter. Generally, the I .•...- . 1 regional facilities shall consist of the following: I .I (A) A regional pumping station at the location ofj the existing Neptune City Sewage Treatment Plant. I This pumping station will receive all the sewage I from Avon, Bradley Beach, Ocean Grove, Neptune I ... j City and midtown Neptune Township and pump it via f • l the regional force main, to Neptune Township's j I i existing Water Pollution Control Plant No. 2, at ·I Old Corlies Avenue. I (B) A regional force main from the Regional I .. Pumping Station in Neptune City to the existing l Water Pollution Control Plant No. 2 at Old Corliesl ,•- Avenue, part of which (from the Shark River Hills l final pumping station to Water Pollution Control I l I Plant No. 2) will be constructed at the same time as the Shark River Hills Sewerage Project is constructed. - (C) Additional Treatment facilities at the existing Water Pollution Control Plant No. 2 to j increase the capacity to meet the projected needs I of the region from time to time. l I (D) Extend the existing Ocean Outfall Line in thl' Atlantic Ocean which is located between·Avon.and Bradley Beach, including diffusers, as wilr·be I I 5 ~-- 't - li I ·- .f,. F I f f, I'II •' II required by the State Department of·Enviromental .. I Protection, of the State of New Jersey. II 2. Upon completion of such construction or .at 'I!, L such earlier time in the course of construction as the pro- II I. gress limit, thereof, permits, and after the municipalities I ·. . I construct certain facilities as will be set forth herein, .. ' I' Authority shalLprovide a connection at the Regional Pumping I :I Station in Neptune City for the municipalities which ~ill l ..II pump to that point, in accordance with the plans and specifil • III I !I cations referred to herein and thereafter receive the sewage' I, ' I! and waste from each municipality for transportation to .~ II Authority's treatment pl~nt for treatment and disposal, II,, 1 provided only that such sewage (i) has originated from wit~-~ II in the geographical limits of the municipality, (ii) other-.! I,II II wise conforms with rules and regulations promulgated by Auth~ ll ,.q ority and/or standards adopted by Resolution from time to •• I time by Authority, in its sole discretion, concerning-the ~, type and quality of sewage and industrial waste accepted fori ; II treatment at Authority's facilities. During the term of II" this Agreement Authority will continuously.operate the I facilities in good repair and will comply with all orders,ofl ' • I any governmental agency having jurisdiction applicable to i the operation, maintenance, repair, modification and/or I expansion of such facilities. ,1 ,,j Section 1.03: Reservation of Capacity by Municipalities in I tl - I Facilities to be constructed by Authority. I The municipalities shall have a reservation in I " ) ~< l ~~ I' t· the Authority Facilities to be constructed·by the Authority f ·II. ~ ;. I in accordance with the provisions of Schedule "C", attached f ~. I, ~ 6 ;J jl I II I .•. .• I ,I il I' I hereto and made a part hereof. j; I II In the event that in any .. year. the volume of sewage I q I !I· delivered or discharged into the AuthoDty Facilities by any ll municipality shall be in excess of the annual and/or daily I I! reservations of capacity set forth in Schedule "C" ·The Autl\- I l I ority ·shall in its then current Schedule of Charges provide a I ..... i surcharge to that municipality for such excess volume. Said ~ h surcharge shall be added to the municipality • s Annual. Servicd il l ll Charge and should be paid by said municipality to the Auth- ; • Ld ority in accordance with the provisionsof Section 2.06 of th tl ! within Contract. l 'i 1. Notwithstanding the payment of any surcharge as 1 11 1 set forth herein, the Abthority, upon written notice to the I il:I mun~c~pa· · 1·~ty, may requ~re· t h e mun~c~pa· · 1·1ty to 1·~m~t · th.e I1 ~~d volume of sewage delivered or discharged by the municipality~I i !ill into the Authority facilities in•excess of the res~rvation l li of capacities set forth in Schedule "C". ii" It is understood and agreed that the failure by the municipality to make provisions for limiting its flow after written notice so to do shall be cause for the Auth- ority to construct additional facilities for handling such I excess,flow as well as flows as may reasonably be expected i I I in the future and to charge the municipality the cost thereot. . - ~·. . I I Section 1. 04: Facilities to be Built by Par'ticipating 1 i; I ~ j' Municipalities. ! ?. ,a, i,~ Each of the municipalities listed bel~w will cause I II II plans and specifications to be·completed with respect to the/ .'/ I '' following facilities and thereafter proceed to construct t;.he 1 t jo .,I; t 1:· facilities, at their own cost and expense, in accordance ,,I! I d I II 1 1 lj I II II I! ;•. ' ' .. . I i ·- I I - ' 'l with such plans and specifications and in compliance with - I,, the requirements of all governmental agencies having II I' il jurisdiction in the matter: ·r.I 1. Avon - conversion of the existing treatment II,, plant at the ocean front to a pumping station tlI including installation of communuter and chlorina-1 I' ., ,,I ,, tor and the construction of a force main from it ! • j II to the regional pumping station at Neptune City. I , /l ji .. t' I !I 2. Bradley Beach- conversion of the two ex1s ~ng1 • I! I I:1 treatment plants at the ocean front to pumping ,,'I if stations including the installation of comrnunuter 'I • • . J .! II and chlorinator and the construction of a force ti • ,,:I main from them to the regional pumping station at I· I~ Neptune City. E.. !: 3. Ocean Grove - the construction of a gravit~ ..·, . l; trunk sewer from the existing treatment plant to II" I.~' li the ocean front to Neptune Township's existing j .,,. Pennsylvania Avenue Station including the installa~ il I I tion of communuter and chlorinator. II I ,.,r j 4. I II Neptune Township and Ocean Grove (jointly) - I lr . f I I! convers~on::o Neptune Township's existing l II ti Pennsylvania· Avenue Station including installation I il,, ( III' of communuter and chlorinator to a pumping stationj I and the construction of a force main from there to: I!d ,r ' the regional pumping station in Neptune City. i':1 ! 'I 5. Neptune City - construction of a Eorce main l I,,, ! I !I and alteration of pump as required to deliver ll,, i tl ! r waste to the regional pumping station including t . il jl t! installation of a communuter and chlorinator. II ll d I• 8 I•l li I l II I tl I II tl I ~.. _... _:... '\\" 'I ...... 'II - I I ~" II I " .--- !' I \ I 6. Wall Township and New Shrewsbury - when sewerag~ ,. - service in the areas within the Neptune Region are I required, the joint construction of an interceptor 1 . II I I' sewer from N~ptune Township's existing Water I' I )I h Pollution Control Plant No. 2 up Shark River Brook I !I as far as may be required to service their needs. ~I II Each municipality will enact and enforce an ordi- II !! nance for pretreatment acceptable to Authority and will cause, q I !ibids to be advertised and received for the construction as j • :1 1 . f 1 . i q set forth above and for the comp et~on o any col ect~on 1· lj ' l !I systems within the municipality .as deemed desirable by each ·, . I ' 4 I I I! of said municipalities, ~oincidentally, as nearly as may be 1 !! practical with the advertisement and receipt by Authority of I /I bids for the construction of the Regional Facilities by .. I ~!Authority. Upon receipt of the bids for the construction of ! 1! l j' the Facilities to be constructed by municipalities as set ~· •. ; forth herein, each municipality shall forthwith proceed with I II the issuance and sale of bonds and/or provide for other I 1\ t ~~ financing in an amount sufficient to pay the cost thereof; ~ !I and will schedule the sale of its bonds coincidentally as I II ji nearly as may be practical for the sale of bonds by Authority .j ·I . ' I II section 1.05: Connections to Trunk and Interceptors; Munici- I !ipalities not to use other Treatment Facilities; Connections II I '/to Collection~tem. Authority will provide a connection at ( /I the regional pumping station in Neptune City for·the munici- I 'I I !;palities which will pump to that point as set forth in the J)plans and specifications to be prepared by Authority's :1 I I, consulting Engineer. Each municipality will require that ~ny 1 I,I sewer lines constructed within its geographical limits,. : !I : 'I\. 9 I :1 I I I r 1 I i I I :...... c. ' •: ., ii • ·. L whether such sewers are constructed by the municipality or I. ,,~;otherwise, be connected to Authority's facilities, either as I I, a result of connection to the then existing collection systems !' ! li or by direct connection at places and in the manner appro~ed II ;, by Authority. ,. i• j ,; So long as this Agreement is in effect, each municipalit~ \l Ill. will not use, or permit others to use, any other tr·eatment '! . it facilities for sewerage collected within each municipality ,,,: i and each municipality will not otherwise compete, or I. " :; permit others to compete, with the Authority facilities. I Each municipality will enact and enforce a mandatory :! ,,I" !I connection ordinance requiring owners of structures occupied "I\ ,.;, or used by human beings to connect, where feasible, to its !;' or Authority's facilities. Each municipality will further i: '· ,.L take all practical steps to prevent storm water from flowing ,.i: :, into Authority's facilities, will not permit any sanitary !; sewerage facilities hereinafter constructed within its ... ,,,. i: municipality to be used as storm sewers, and will require 1:' I' all building roof drainage systems to disconnect from the I• p ' •I sanitary plumbing facilities draining into it or the I'.j i Authority's facilities. 1: i· SECTION.l.06: Approval of Plans and Specifications. !i ~... :1 Each municipality and Authority agree that, for the I. !: purpose of synchronizing the completion of tl!.e facilities to · .. li - ;; be constructed by each municipality as set forth herein, ,; ;: Authority's engineers will act as coordinators .. Those facili...: ' ·-· -· (! ties to be constructed by each municipality will be in- ,I ' .. stalled and in service at the estimated time of completion of 1 (' I! !j 1; Authority facilities. Each municipality will submit to i ~ , Authority documents prepared or appro~ed by the mun~cipalities' I I 'i,. ,, li" -10- 1 I; fi •• ..,._,_. -·''··--.--,-··- 1 ·': .. ' engineer in a form satisfactory to Authority's engineers snowing: (i) locations at which e•ch municipality proposea t. .. to";connect its sewers to Authority's facilities; (ii) size of pipe and the invert elevation thereof by means of which· -. I!" . .' t: !~·it is proposed to make each such connections: (iii) the type ""~ i I I i and class o~ pipe which it is proposed to use in each such t I ,I connection; (iv) the average and peak, present and future, I ~ II sewage flows w'bich it is proposed to discharge at each connel- t:i.on; (v) and for the guidance of Authority's engineers in tHe I • I actual design of connections, an engineering drawing of each I! ! I such connection incorporating the information called for abo~e. I .• • I! Within sixty (60) days of written notice by Auth~ I ority a written report covering the requirements of sub I !,' paragraph Four of the first paragraph of Section 1.06, · shalll • l L be delivered to the Authority. I Authority may request modification of the data subl!.. mitted by each municipality. Final plans and Specifi~ations of a municipality's connection to Authority's facilities shall ·incorporate only the factors and matters herein ""Which .have been approved by Authority . • Section 1.07: Measurement of flows. After it has received from each municipality the i! data and information stipulated under Section 1.06 above and 1 li has finally approved the same with or without modifications, I - li Authority shall formulate and deterwine in detail the final ! 1 plan f<'r the measurement or other detemination of flows I I such that, by procedures of direct or differential metering \1. I I ! or other methods, the flow delivered to Authority's faciliti,s Ir by each munici.pality will be determined • .\ II,, II -11- .""":~~~;., , ... -~Ji ~.:'i·-o;:,.·,··~~ ·-~-· --- ... '----· --·-- ~----- .. ~-·-·· I ...... P''- j I II •. - ie· Section 1.08: Acquistion of Existing Facilities; Abandoned I Facilities. Any municipality having within its geographical boundaries a private sewerage corporation shall assume respo :j sibility for the acquisition of facilities comprising the private sewerage system or the furnishing of sewerage treat- :1,. ment service through Authority .Facilities with respect to ... ! such private sewerage system. If any such private sewerage I I! I !I system is acquired by any municipality, it will, at its sole I • lj expense, discontinue the treatment of sewage with:respect · 1! to such plan and cause the same to be abandoned and disman- li tled. In such event the municipality, at its sole cost and jl expense, will construct• the necessary facilities to divert II sewage from such plant and will connect such private sewer- rtl I age system to Authority facilities in accordance with the I terms hereof. II ·~ II JI II. Service Charge and Provisions for Payment II ,I Thereof. 1: d. Section 2.01: Payment 'I ' Each municipality shall pay to Authority an annual 'I jl serv~ce charge consisting of metered volume of charges for II I operation and maintenance and capital cost (annual debt ser- I f rI vice) of Authority Facilities. I (A) Charges for Operation and Maintenance. i I Each municipality will pay to the Authority, for I - II the latter's service in transporting, treating and disposing; li of sewerage discharge from the municipality • s ·collection.- \ !· !I system an annual operation and mainten~nce charge. Said II charge shall be determined by multiplying the·ratio of the il d annual metered volume of sewage, at the point of connection I! i) 12 ""'-· ·- I. II .I li., 11 to Authority facilities, to the total annual metered volume '' of sewage treated at the treatment plant, by the actual total 'I 1 I, I I• annual cost of operation and maintenance of the Authority's '• facilities. All volumes of flow to be measured byAfithority. 1! I (B) Pa ment of Ca ital Costs. annual debt servic ) Capital cost for the construction of the regional facilities shall be defined·as the.Authority's.obligations .. ., other than as set forth in Section 2.01 (A) of the within .... ·li ll contract and shall be inclusive of those matters set forth in , l' N.J.S.A.40:14A-8(c), and its amendments and supplements: withj • I I! the exception of expenses of operation and maintenance of thel fl ,, Authority facilities: insurance; repairs, renewals and re- tl • • placements and improvements of a minor nature: and the re- lj serves for expenses of su~h operation and maintenance deemed· j I I necessary or desirable by the Authority. I II The capital cost for the construction of the re- • ~~ I gional facilities to be constructed by Authority as set forthj •. u I I' herein will be distributed among Neptune Towrthip, Ocean Grover I Bradley Beach, Avon and Neptune City as follows: I !1 1. For the regional pumping station, regional II 1 I force main, and extension of ocean outfall line, the cost lI I I 1 will be distributed in the same proportion as the capacity 1 il that is provided for each municipality in these facilities is I' to the total capacity of the facility. Expressed as a ,[ formula, this would be: I I i Cost to A :-~ Capacity provided for A (MGD) X Capital I: Total capacity of facility (MGD) Cost of I ·t Facility I - il I I; 2. For the additional treatment facilities the { cost will be distributed in the same proportion as the l I additional capacity that is provided for each municipality is 1:.. to the added capacity of the facility. Expressed as a form- •• li . 'I - 13 - !Ill II .. ~ .., ula, this would be: .. Capacity provided for A in the addition (MGD) • ·I' . Cost to A ·.. ---,.--..,...,--::--:--:-:---::---.-::-:-:--~-:-:---X. capital co~t Capacity added to the facility by the of the 1 I \ addition (MGD) addition .I •• ; 1 3. At such time as enlargement of the treatment .. I facilities is again necessary, the cost of such. enlargement .~ .. I will be distributed only among the. rnunicipalitieg,:ror ltlhom t~e ' enlargement is made on the same basis, as set forth in I I Il, Section 2.01 (B) (2). I • I II . i (C) If alterations, modifications, additions or .. ! l other construction requiring capital expenditures to improve II the degree of treatment pre deemed necessary by Authority or I,,, II are ordered by regulating agencies having control thereof,· t~ I cost of such facilities will be distributed among the ~artie-! ipating municipalities in the same proportion as the capacity! provided for each municipality is the total capacity of the r• I i facility. I (D) The metered volume charges as~t forth above 'I $hall be uniform throughout the municipalities for the same I! type class and. amount of use or service of Neptune's facili- ties provided, however,. that Authority may include in such rate provision, in its discretion, for surcharges giving - weight to the characteristics of the sewage·andother waste discharged or disposedof through Authority's facilities and any other special matter effecting the cost of treatment and '' concentration of solids and chemical composition. I has the right to charge as provided for herein if the m~~ici-1 I! . II I . 14 ,, ...... • ~ in this ... ~ re ~ I 'k ! ~ ~ ~ J ~: .•... ' I section 2.01. Thereafter, Authority may, from time to time, I, II upon 60 days prior written notice to each municipality, ~ I • establish a revised schedule of rates which shall go into li I ll effect at the time stated in the notice. I il I l ..• tJ I I Section 2.03: No Free Sqrvice; Other Service Standards. I I J Authority's service charges as set forth herein 'j' I shall be calculated and each municipality shall not offer or I i I provide free services to any user of its sewerage collection • L 'I system. /, I I. If the nature of the sewage or industrial waste ' .Iq .! l received from any industrial or commercial user imposes a I II .burden on Authority's facilities, in excess of that resulting! I I' I • ,I from ordinary household sanitary sewage, Authority may requir~ il ! pretreatment of such. sewage or waste or may impose an addi- I • . I I tional or surcharge upon the user in accordance with appro- I I l priate sanitary engineering standards. I I, I Section 2.04: Municipality Cooperation with Authority. III' I Each municipality will cooperate with'Authority to 'j 1- assure that proper payment charges are paid to Authority with I.., I· respect to each user benefiting from Authority's facilities, .I II and, to that end, agrees that (i) it will refuse totransport 1 1: I I' I :I through its sewerage collection systems any sewage which em- I if II I t\!. ' 15 I I ll" .\ ' •. I '':, t ' 'I I i I enatea from users outside of the municipality, unleea auch II users or the municipality in which they are located are il parties to an agreement with Authority in respect of 1.1 Authority's regional facilities: (ii) the municipalities will take such steps as Authority recommends to prohibit excessive !I infilltration of the municipalities• sewer~ge collection ,., I system and (iii) the municipalities will permit Auth~rity•a I agents and reRresentatives to inspect the municipality's ll•t ii sewerage collection system at all reasonable times. !I li section 2.05: Municipality's Financial Responsibilities. II Each municipality is obligated to levy and -impose ; ! r I. J . !I sewer rents or charges (hereinafter called .. sewer rents .. ), I , . . ... ) l I' or make appropriations (hereinafter called .. appropr1.at1.ons ., I for the use of its sewerage collection system in amounts I I,II sufficient to discharge its obligations to Authority, as set l : forth under Section 2.01, hereof and under this section. I .. '! The minimum level of each municipality's sewer rent (which I may be different for different classes of users), or !I !l appropriations, shall be sufficient to produce total actual II II collections, on an annual basis, or appropriations, equal to • i~ 102% of the municipalities obligation to Authority under ~~ Section 2.01 till the"required minimum in its sewer Rent ll Reserve Account (as hereinafter provided for) has been '~.- accumulated (and during any period after withdrawal therefro~ I.I l' I {' Jj until the same has been restored), and tle reafter equal to ! .... J! 100% thereof. Each municipality may impose higher charges orl' )j appropriations at its discretion. J ., // Each municipality will adopt, with the approval of I rrr \ r :1 Authority, prior to the connection of the'municipality•s j f' f // sewerage collection system to Authority • s facilities, and I i jj 1 :• I• 1 li i !I 16 III· II - thereafter from time to time revise to the extent necessary, ' ...... ' ~ schedule of sewer rents or appropriations calculated to produce collections equal to 102% of the municipality's obligation under Section 2. 01. Upon such initial adopt·ion, and upon such subsequent revision, such schedule shall becom ..' . the effective schedule of sewer rents or appropriations im- ...... ',• -~ ·~. posed by the municipality, and the munlcipality will adopt .., such necessary ordinances or resolutions as Authority may re · 1 ! • I quest, as are necessary to impose such rents or appropriatio~s I II.I upon users of the municipality's sewerage collection system, but the municipality reserves the right to alter the rent ' j 'I I, charges or appropriations' set forth in any such initial or l I revised schedule by increasing or decreasing the rate applic1 le I I to any or all classes of users, provided only that the cha~g,s or appropriations as so altered shall at all times be suff1- I .. j I cient to comply with trecovenants of the municipality·con- I '\ tained in the immediately preceding paragraph of this I section. If the municipality collections or appropriations are less'than the municipality•s payments provided for in section 2.01, the municipality shall forthwith make up the deficit out of its current revenues or any other funds legally available for the purpose and if the available funds 1 I are insufficient, shall make payment of the deficit out of 1 I 1,_ l the first funds being legally available thereafter and shall} II include the unpaid balance of the deficit in its budget for· succeeding years until such deficit is paid in full. I I I I I If the municipality•s collections or appropriation I_ exceed the amount payable under Section 2.01, the excess wil -17- • < .. - ,~ . II be deposited by Authority to the credit of the municipality a s~wer Rent Reserve Account and may be invested in direct · obligations of the United States of America or deposited in !I time accounts secured as provided by Law, the income to be I credited to the municipality's account. Authority shall ,, < • accumulate in the Sewer Rent Reserve Account the minimum . ' \\ balance equal to the next two quarterly payments to become I! !! due from the municipality (as estimated by Authority): The !I,, i1 municipality may elect to accumulate and maintain an addi- II IIli tional amount not exceeding two such quarterly payments. The Sewer Rent Reserve shall be used to make up any defi- 11 ciencies in quarterly pa~ments due from the municipality. !I After the minimum balance (plus the additional balance if I' i! the municipality elects to accumulate the same as aforesaid). 'I I,I has been accumulated in the Reserve, the excess will be 'I If II turned over by Authority to the municipality. .. •. I':I I' Section 2.06: Calculation and Certification of Payments. On or before the lSthday of January in any 1 year in which Authority shall calculate a rate or rates, as I ,I herein ~bove provided, .Authority shall calculate and certify i II to the municipalities the amount of money which each shall bel II I !I required to pay to Authority during that year. As to each J) municipality, such amount shall be calculated·by Authority by li applying said rate or rates (including any applicable sur- I charges as provided herein) to the capital cost (annual debt 1 i service) and metered volume flow, as set forth herein, by the! II,, I rj I j, municipality during the full year ending on the last day of I II!. I I',, ! . I, 18 ii ; )\ II !j I I I X ,,"., ~ .. - .. - il .I II l 'I 'I l· ' December next preceding as shown by the records of 'I ! Authority, or, if there is no record covering the same during ~~ a full year, then the amount of volume of sewerage (if any) ' ~ . ;~ plus the capital cost annual debt service) which Authority ' '· i· then estimates for said municipality for the first full year ·: of operation of Authority's facilities. ,• Authority shall notify ehe municipalities in writing 1: I' of the date Authority facilities are ready to accept sewage ~ I' from one or more of the municipalities. Within sixty (60) I' days of said n0tice the municipality or municipalities, .' !' whether actually connected to Authority's facilities or not, shall commence payments annually to Authority in the minimum :I'I ;\;; amount, as set forth below. In the event the municipality or municipalities have failed by that time to connect all of I' their collection systemsto Authority's facilities; (a) each j ~ I " municipality will be required to pay the charge that is .. charged for the capital cost (annual debt service) set fo;th f; ·· herein; (b) and in addition a charge for estimated volume of .,; 1 • flow. The schedule below represents the estimated volume ·i 11 of sewage to be treated in Authority facilities, for each I; ,;\ municipality, at the time each municipal collection system is connected to Authority's facilities. The minimum amount I;' to be paid by each municipality for the metered volume of flow charge, as set forth herein, shall be calculated on the estimated volume set forth below in accordance with this section: Ocean Grove 185 MGY(million gallons per year) Avon 74 MGY Neptune City 170 MGY N~ptune Township 650 MGY i)ll~ Bradley Beach 277 MGY ·--I I . 11 .'· .. -19- . - • \I I I I Section 2.07: Payments by Municipality. Each municipality shall in each year make provisiJ II for all payments to become due from it to Authority li.ereund, ·I and shall pay to Authority the amounts as set forth herein I under Section 2.01, in equal quarterly payments as herein- 1 ! I! after stated, the amount of money certified to it in· or for I I such year by Authority. Such quarterly payment shall be due ji· on and be made on or before the 1st day of April ,I , I • II July , October and January If any part of any such installment shall remain unpaid for il,t !I thirty days following its due date, the municipality shall be II!j I charged with and pay to.Authority interest on the amount un- 1 !II; I il paid from its due date until paid, up to the rate perm.itted l by law. I .I I r! III • Miscellaneous Provisions. .t ., I I II I i' Section 3.01: Capital Additions. 11----- ·I , Authority shall provide such additions, improvementt, I! expansions, extensions, repairs and replacements, to or of , ,I I ~~ Authority• s facilities, as Authority shall deem necessary or j I I! appropriate in order ~ provide the service required under l I this agreement, or as may be required by any governmental I I agency having jurisdiction in the matter, and such additions, I! etc., shall thereupon be deemed Authority•s facilities for \ jl all purposes of this Agreement. j - jl i i Section 3.02: Engineer. I 1 Authority shall employ an engine~r or engineering t r I 1! firm, registered in New Jersey, qualified to pass upon water :!pollution control and sanitary sewage engineering matters, ~ \ ,,il ,,!1 20 II j .• t . ., . ·~ -· I II ll I I. who shall, in addition to performing such other functions 1: as may be appropriate, prepare annually and submit to each ' 1 !m~nicipality, at least 60 days prior to the first date-pro jlvided by law, for the adoption. of the municipality budget, a il report setting forth (i) such information as may be required Ito permit the municipality to carry out its obligations under i ... Ithis Agreement;· (ii) a determination of whether Authority's : .. I jl facilities are being properly maintained; (iii) any additions, I ) - 1 improvements, expansions, repairs or replacements which may i llbe required in the ensuing year; and (iv) a report as to the l d I !!operations of Authority for the preceding year and recommendai ' II tiona for the forthcomina year, which shall include comment lj on the adequacy of insurance policies and the amounts of in- 11 surance to be carried and recommendations as to charges. II 11 Section 3.03: Independent Public Accountant; Annual Report. r 'I Authority shall employ an independent public accoun~- II I ant who shall annually, as of December 31, of each year, make \ I ! an audit of Authority's records and accounts relating to I lj . li Authority's facilities and report thereon to Authority and th~ ,,r1municipalities. Such report shall state the accountant's I I! opinion' as to whether Authority is in compliance with the loan agreement, securing bonds 'I other obligations relating to Authority's facilities and as / the sufficiency of Authority's rate charges then in force. I 1 .- I I. Section !· 04: G~~· 1 \1 Authority agrees to make application for both . (I ;I I, federal and state grants which may be available and for which 1 IIAuthority may be eligible. Authority agrees to deduct from j !l - ·~- p i II I :! 21 !; li I I I j ··-·. -::-- •·,~. --'7"';:·· ·.- .. .., ... ,. I I ,," I ;. d ' ,,I''I I~ i lj the capital cost of the regional facilities, to be constructed ' I by Authority as set forth herein, such federal and state . ' ,I ' ,: grants in aid df construction so that all municipalities wil~ '! benefit pro rat.e from such available grants. I Th~ parties hereto agree that tJ-.c:.' will cooperate I! with one another in efforts to obtain federal at1d. state ... 1: grants 1n aid of construction of the regional facilities set ''· f: 1: forth herein. • '1 I il j; Section 3.05: C~nd~_tioned UEon .St_ate and Fe(!eral Approval. I; This Aqreement is conditioned upon approval by the ··. ; : ~. ..;'. State of New Jersey and the United States Government of planSI H lj and specifications for Neptune's facilities. ,, .;·, ,l : ,, rr-..:. Section 3.0G: Duration of Contract. ' II., This contract shall run for a continuous period of !I I ji the life of the regional facilities constructed and maintain-• ~~· .: 'I 1r::~~· , :r ~~ ~.~·· ed by Authority. ~:~,.-. llI ,. ,: ll Section 3.07: Binding UPQn Succ~ssors. ~-~·~·(·I .. I' ;' ..... j! II This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties ll hereto and their successors in interest, and shall become ilI. effective upon its execution by the parties hereto. '·ii ,, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, acting II tl through their duly authorized officers, have caused the due r,I i' execution hereof, and their respective corporate s~als to i•;t 1,.' be hereto affixed, as of the date and year first above ..,. I ii written. 'I ,. TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE SEWERAGE AUTHORITY ,• Att.est: 11 , . • ·' . ~. ,;/ ~(Sea.l). -\1:-'!.t,' II ..__.. By_::__i .:..···;.....)~· ..... · · __ _,,.}_~_;_~-·-'=--~-- Chairman 'l :' ,,'• I. / BOROUGH OF BRADLEY BEACH i: ) !I Attest: . ( 4 ,· i: 1 I By ··,.._. ·. ).v,, ,,,-/ I tseal) ~'- .' ~ I! II" ll BOROUGH OF AVON-BY-'J¥:IE-SEA /) (SEAL) ji ATTEST: By : ~ L. ;· t-£ ··.-- ,.:;.) .·- .A~-(f__ ;i-· /~7· I, I li ( Mayor .;/ I" "' ... ---- ... It •·· .b' "- zq ~ -"' ~ l- -.: \ ~ I !! II BOROUGH OF NEPTUNE CITY 'I ' / /); {'.. ' / ;. ;·;~ ~. (SEAL) I ATTEST: By / f"l1,../ 1 ( 1 ' 'c{ ~Jz,) ) ( • Mayor , J f,. -,..?t ( .e;ta;\, · clerk t !! t. TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE IN THE COUNTY _.h!;!:_ TTES .-··:· --,. )-, BOyF MONMOUTH . i (SEAL) . _ - ~f'-' __ ·_,~-~t~~~~~-~b~-f~~~/~~~·(~·c~1~.)~-~4i~t~~a~·-~J~------\ij ./' C"" L:fkc--L.../'1_. <: .r Mayor \\ Clerk ii J OCEAN GROVE CAMP MEETING ASSOCIATION I•i . . OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 1 A · !i ATTEST: By ~L-~ lf~-~.,-dr~A'a~ ~~ ~~ i! II t ·i I I i l! I; \! ji ·I lj i i I I! I.'I I! ll 'I II ! -23- ( .. ;~STER~~ SE'..JER. UTI Ll TY SYSJ~) SCHEDULE B COST OF CO~~s.-.-r.UCTI ON Section !1.]_ Gallons (A) (B) Total \C) f...l: cca- f.. 11 cce: ted Adjusted Maximum Over To Be ,-,.... r +- ...,.._,_, ... J c,:::t c~ :::a ci < R0rained Genera i Elect. Bc:sic t en ;~ Cost tv 4 _..::_·-':__ To 2e Sold -unit Description , _ _.;...;..:....:...:;...;__::._c__ 1. 1 nlet Channel, etc. 49,295.00 l , s75.00 -0- 50,870.CC 1. 76 7.054.24 57,924.24 7.5 3.2 33.207. s~· 2:..;,;16.27 2. Co~minutor & Grit Chamber 49,660.00 1 ,5?5.00 -0- 51 . 235. GO 1.77 7,09'-<.32 58,329.32 3.25 58.329.32 3. Pri~~ry Settling Tank 12 7, 142. 00 -C- -0- 127 '142. 00 4.4J.C 17,635.59 144,777.59- 2.65 144) /77.59 4. Trickling Filter 128,186.00 -0- -0- 128,186.00 4.43 17.755.84 145 .9+1.24- 2.5 14 5 '9!.f 1 • E.4 5. Final Settling Tank 144.123.00 -0- -0- 144,123.00 4.98 19,S60.29 ~6~,083.29 3.5 16-t,C83.29 6. Digestion Tanks 351,066.00 8,811.00 8,830.00 368,707.00 12.75 51,103.14 419,810.14-2.5 ~19,810.14 ""7 I • Pumping Station 117,000.00 1 .500.00 -0- 118,500.00 4. 10 16,433.17 134.933.17 9.0 4.7 64,Y71.07 70,u62.10 8. Pumps 12,000.00 1,700.00 -0- 13 ,7CC.OO .47 1,883.80 15,563.80 4.5 .2 14,59i .85 691.92 9. Detention Tank 218,467.00 -0- 2.360.00 220,827.00 7. 64 30,62 j. 81 Z51 ,!.J.'"8.81 9.0 4. 7 120,142.24 131,306.57 10. Power Supply -0- 4 3' l 00.00 -0- 43,100.00 1.49 5. 972.05 49,072.05 9.0 4.7 23.~6.63 25,62.5.42 11 • Emergency Power Supply -0- 36,000. GO 5,020.00 41 ,0~0. 00 1.42 5 '6$1.49 46,771.49 5.0 .7 40,223.48 6,S'-l3.01 < 1.., 1 2. Office a~d Shop, etc. 82,766.0J 7,420.CO 1,500.00 9i ,625.00 ... • l : 12.705.64 iJ~:39i.64 9.0 ~.7 43,878.33 54,513.:1 , 3. Sludge Filtration 129,893.00 9,275.00 1 ,5GJ.OO 14C,66S.oc ~.86 19,479.32 ·, so , ; J.; 7. 3 2 4. 3 i 60' j 47.32 14. Digester Heating 15,000.00 1 '255. 00 i 2, 7:.o. oo 29,585.00 1. 02 w.,oc8.25 33.673.25 4.3 33,673.25 1 5 . Recirculation Pumps 26,253.00 3,150.00 -0- 29,1..03.00 1.02 4,::88.25 33,491.2.5- 2.5 3 3 'L;S1 • 2 5 16. Site 'Work (A) 147,107.00 3.570.00 -0- 1~.C,67/.C'O -c; "L!"'' 2C, 882. 15 1/i,559.i5 3.5 1/1,559.15 17· Land 34,4CO,c:: 1. 19 -../t9.62 59,169.62 9.0 4.7 18,715.2W. (" 18. Grading 17,375.CO -~'-' 2,4(.!.;,85 ~9.773.85 ;,.5 13) 779.85 19- Outfall Sewer 366,S51.00 12.69 50,862.66 417,813.66 6.5 2.2 276,383.74 141,425.92 20. Ocean Out fa 11 90,000.00 3. 11 12,465.16 182,465.16 6.5 2.2 67,7SC.70 3L,~24.46 21. Easerr.ents 2.f,606.CO .as 3,4C6.88 28,012.88 28,012.S8 zz. A. P. Land 5,400.00 • 19 761.54 6: 161 . 54 6, 161 .54 23· Trunk Lines 393.395.51 13.60 54,510.02 447.905.53 447,905.53 24- Site Work at Plant, Trunk Lines, etc.* 210,622.37 _7.28 29,178.89 239,801.26 239.801.25 --~-- 2,892,233.88 100.00 400,808.97 3,293,047.85 Equals 2,782.615.49 510,432.36* 25· Other Work - 1970 10,916.98 = To Be A11 ocated --Engineering, Legal, Accounting, Advertising, * Carried forward to section 2. Insurance, Electric, Interest on Notes, etc. 400 1 81J8 • ;37 Tota 1 Spent 3,303,%4.83 Unexpended 4,335.17 , Total Ordinance $3,308,3CC.CJO * jn addition to the wcrk at (A) 1 ...... >' "' ' ... TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE SCHEDULE B Rfr>UCT I ON OF COST TO fiE SOLD ---... ------t I TO REFLECT FEDERAL GRANT ~ct ion HJ_ a~ --- f, I' ' t' Basic Cost Unit Brought A 11 ocated Actual One Half Adjusted ~ f' Description Forward Excess Allocated of Basic Cost Number To Be Sold ~--~ Cost Cost To Be Sold 3.2/7.5 24,]16.27 21,704.00 3,012.27 10,852~00 13,864.27 4.7/9.0 7 70, Lf62, 10 61,8H3.00 8,579.10 30,941.50 39,520.60 ,2./1+.5 8 691.92 609.00 82.92 304.50 387.42 lf.l/9. 0 9 131,306.57 11S,37.1.00 15,985.57 57,660.50 73, 6L16, 07 ~ 4.7/9.0 ' 10 25,625 ,1+2 22,508.00 3,117.42 11 '254. 00 14,371.42 .l/5 .0 11 6,548.01 5 '7 51 • 00 797.01 2,875.50 3,672.51 1+.//~J.O 12 54,513.31 47 ,r.:~o.oo 6,633.31 23 ,91-+0.00 30,573.31 ·~.7/9.0 17 20,Lf54.38 171 96/.f o 00 2 ,li 90. 38 s, 9c12. oo 11,472.38 z.vG.5 19 14'1 ,429.92 12 1~ , 199 • 00 1/,230.92 62,099.50 79,330, Lf2 2.2/6.) 20 _l.4, 684 ,l+6 _}!Jl.l:_(l?.. 00 -~'.!!]}__._ 46 1~;, 231.00 _l2,,_lf5~ .46 $510, t, 3 2. 36 l.tlt3,281 .00 67,151.]6 ?2Lf, !40.~0 ~':1::=-l:~ ~ .. ¥J:d" .....,,...1"'l'~r~.::; 286.291.86 - ·.--::r~;'!t.'l' ·::-:"'UC: .. ~."t -.::-:.-~:~'"1.'! .. "3 J:r'1T;:1.'·--~ THIS TillS TillS + THIS -· THIS See Col. c S('f' Co I • A S~e Co i. B ~ct· Credit Car,-fed ~ct ion /11 seC"tTon,/1 }ec-i"Too#T F0r ')1}/ F()r7,1-:~ r d --~·-- ---·-· Federal To_£.i?.Y.~------Grant Schedule --·~---- ·- _?r.·cLion #3 ' - f. "'• ; f-'-. ' .. • • t -----TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE SCHEDULE 8 ANNUAL fb)' MQI.I ~~..b.f ~ ~ ''1 --DUE TO NEPTUNE TOWNSHIP \t SEWER UTILITY SYSTEM ,,~ FOR E.XCESS CAPACITY IN FACILITIES Section fil A :': ~·:-,·, .~ To Be Sold 4. 4o;{ Prior 1 Unpaid Principal Interest Years Total }, ,l Balance Payment Paym(:!!!_ Interest , Payment 1 4/1/73 286,291 .86 4/1/74 273 ,81+4.39 12,4/.j].47 12,596.8ll 3,286.13 28.330 .41* '*11 /75 261 '396. 92 II 12 ,01+9.15 II 27,782.75 11/1/7& 248,9119.45 II 11 , 50 I. 46 II 27.235.06 1~11177 236,501.98 II 10,953.77 II 26,687.37 l~j 1/78 221+ ,OSIL 51 II 10,1+06.08 II 26' 139.68 't 11/1/79 211 '607. Ql* II 9,858.39 II 25. :>91. 99 4/1/80 199.159.57 II :J,310.70 II 25,044.30 4/1/81 186.712. 10 II 8,763.01 II 21f 'll96. 61 ) 'i/l/82 174,26h.63 II 8,7.15 32 II ,., 23 '948. 92 ,. .'+/ 1/83 161,817.16 II 7,667.63 11 23 ,L1Ql • 23 1 r,; 1/84 149,369.69 II 7 '119.94 II 22,8SJ.;,h 4/1/85 136,922.22 II 6,572.25 II 22,305.85 4/1/86 124,474.75 II 6,021+.56 II 21,758.16 11 II ·1 '•11 /87 112,027.28 5 '1+76. 87 21 ,210.47 4/1/88 99,579.81 II I+, 9? 9. 18 II 20,662.78 4/1/89 87, 132.3L1 11 1+,3()1.L19 II 20,115.09 h/1/90 74, 681+. 87 II 3,B33.80 II 19,56/.L•O 4/1/91 62,237.1-~0 II 3 ,28fl, 11 II 19,019.71 II II :~' 4/l/92 49,789.93 2. 738.J.J.2 18 ,L\7f_ .07. 11/ 1/93 37.3ll2,1+6 11 2' 190./3 II 17,924.33 4/1/94 24,894.99 II 1 '61+3. Oil II 17,376.64 4/1/95 12,447.52 If 1 ,095. 35 II 16,828.95 ~ ~ 1+/1 /96 12 'It I+ 7. 52 sL+7. 69 3,286.18 16,281.39 ( ..~. 286,291.86 151,161.78 75.581.04 513,034.68 Prior Year c. lnt0rest 1967-68 12,596.84 1968-69 II 1969-70 II 1970-71 II 1971-72 II 1972-73 II ·: ...:: Total I nt,~res 1 • $75 ,581.01+ on $7.86,291.86 for~ (.§) 1cars. ------t!":C'"e%1..$t'F"'..a.~- *After federal granl aid on qualifying co~ts plus other apportioned ordinance expendi tures per 5ection #2. ...{ ..... ~ .... -.' ~-·--... ··· . .t SCHEDULE C Reservations of Capacity in Authority Facilities (Based on Anticipated Flow in the year 1990) ,. MUNICIPALITY ANNUAL DAILY 'J: (Max.) (Max.) f<, ~-.. f MGY MGD ' Avon-by-the-Sea 74 ~ o. 4. Bradley Beach 277 1.' 1.4 Neptune City 170 13 0.5 i. ,,' 441 0 Ii Neptune Township 650 3.0 I .. - Ocean Grove 185 I'#' 1.1 - New Shrewsbury* Wall Township* 1,356 "'4 6."'4 f.-•.. !f. *To be determined at a later date. - . - ... ·. .. R E S 0 L U T I 0 N WHEREAS, Township of Neptune entered into a contract with the Township of Neptune sewerage Authority on . - April 11, 1973; and WHEREAS, said contract, among other things, provided qenerally for the abatement of pollution on a re- gional basis~ and I WHEREAS, generally under the terms of the Agree- ,i i ! ment, the Authority was to transport sewage from the indiv- t idual collection systems of the municipalities, including I '1 - the Township of Neptune~ and WHEREAS, under the terms of the Agreement, the - facilities owned by the Township of Neptune were to b~ en- larged in order to accommodate capacities for the munici- palities in the Neptune Region: and WHEREAS, pursuant to criteria established by the - 1: United States Envi;ronmental Protection Agency, it is neces- sary to prepare an environmental protection statement and to - conduct infiltration inflQW studies, and present the same I- to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and the United States Environmental Protection Agency in - order to aualify for granta-in-aid of construction: and I' ' WHEREAS, both the State and Federal Agencies allt )· ... ; ,.~ l individual customer municipalities to obtain a high priority rating so as ultimately qualify for grants-in-aid of construcr tion for which, otherwise, the municipalities would not qualify~ NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Township of Neptune, in the county of Monmouth, that Township of Neptune I I I SP.Werage Authority be and hereby is auth~riz~d tof make ap- . I f· plication for loans, grants, and grants-~n-aLd o constructLon I I and environmental assessment statements, infiltration inflow j I ' studies and analysis, and grants-in-aid of construction and ~ : rehabilitation of existing facilities if needed, to the New I Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. B~ IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in the event that repayment for the above, in whole or in part, is required, the Township of Neptune shall only pay ita proportionate i :;I, share. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Authority be and hereby is authorized to engage the services of consult- ants to make the Environmental Assessment Study, and Infil- tration Inflow Study. BE IT·FURTHER RESOLVED that the loahs and grantSi I '· applicable to· the construction of sanitary sewerage facili- !' ,,n ties by Neptune Township and the rehabilitation of existing i f' I - facilities, if needed, be performed by the consultants and contractors of Neptune Township, under the direction of the Te>wnship of Neptune sewerage Authority. BE IT FUf·· HER RESOLVED that any and all grants and loans for construction and rehabilitation as set forth above be paid by the 7\uthority to the Township of Neptune. I I 1 ,, I, Jo!.eph E. Bf.nnett Clerk of the Township of Neptune, do hereby certify that the above is u true and exact copy of a resolution adopted bv the Townshio Committee of the fownship of Neptune on October 2, 1973 • ..... I I 1Joseph E. Bennett, Township C:lerfC f l f I I '- i I \ ,._ l I !~ I ·~·' • ~,.t ,. i!li il -.~ 1: II RESOLUTION BOROUGH OF NLPTUNE CITY WHEREAS, by ordinance adopted January 22, 1973, the Borough of Neptune City app1ovcd a Contract with The Township of. Neptune SewcragL' \uthority as set forth in said ordinance; and 1\'HEREAS, pursuant to said Contract and in furtherance thereof, it is necessary for each of the Municipalities referred to in said Contract, including the Borough of r\eptune City, to complete an environmental study and an infiltration inflow study, anJ it is further necessary for the Borough of i\eptune City to cause plans and specifications to be completed for the construc tion of a force main and for alteration of pump as required to deliver waste to the regional pumping station including installa- tion of a comminutor and chlorinator; and WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of the Borough :. '• of Neptune City that this Resolution be adopted and the aforesaid ,, studies and plans and specifications be completed as expeditious ' ' ly as possible; and ~ -. I. ~. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Borough of Neptune City I that the ~onsultant for the said Township of Neptune Sewerage l Authority he and he is hereby, authorized to complete said i II environmental study on behalf of the Borough of i\eptune City on t condition that said Borough shall be obligated to pay only its I proportionate sh3rc thereof for said study; and i/f ft.: ~l, '* \ ~· ' ·~'. .. jl ! I :I DB IT PURTHER RESOLVED that tho en,ineor for the salcl Township of Neptune Sewerage Authority if available to clo so, and if not, thon tho Borough Engineer, be, and he is hereby authori%od to complete said infiltration inflow study as l&ae applies to the BorouKh of NGptune City, toðor with the aforesaid plans and specifications for construction and alterations of Neptune City facilities as required in said Contract~ and 'I I BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Township of Neptune j II Sewerage Authority make application for such federal or li state grants as may be available to offset the costs incurred tl by the Borough of Neptune City for the aforesaid services '!I I,~ and the construction and aiteration of Neptune City's · I' :I,, facilities as required in said contract. !( 'I ,,ij ;i ll - I fT 011(7 t-C' J) Jc>pf· .2..... l I. t ,". k •:.· ~ ('.Y ~· ... '.·" - Chur :1, ~~~~reinafter rck ... ; to c.JS tr,,· "A::.·oO< i A.utt1ori+y, t:vr-~·ir1attt·r r-tft:rr·ed to a~ l' dH·~irous ot ,.btaining finar,cial .aid from the Cnvir~>nrrent,.Ji Pr, ·-·cti-.)r' Agency ror d'" i~Jil and construction of the facil itic:" n'qui·-·d by ,:id "Agn=;errent", and ~,lREAS the Neptune lownst1 ip Sewerage Authority has received the Final Priority Hank of 30 on t•:i) Priority List of Projects for Fiscal Year 1974 as established by tt.e Divi!..ion of Water Resources of the State of New Jersey, Def artrren t of Env i ronrrenta I Protect ion, and VMEREAS a joint application for State and Federal financial aid, made by the "Authority" on behai f of the "Association'~ would effect tor the "Association" d simil.:lr t·riority rank, and . j WHEREAS the 11 Association" wishes to coordinate the process '~gut applications~ design and plans and speci tications, with those of the "Authority" f l' NOW THERE FOHl BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Trusttles of the Ocean Grove Ca~ Meeting Association ot ine United tvk:lthodist Cr,urch, that the "Authority 11be and hereby is authorized to prepare, on I.Jehal f of the "Association" and with the aid ot tectmical data and information· prepared by the Association Ln0in0er, all necessary Siate and Federal Applications to obtain 90)b fin:Jncial aid toward design and construction of propos9d "Association" sewerage faci I ities. ~C. IT FURTHER HESOLVED that the "Authority" be and hereby fs authorized to prepart;, ,)n b8hal f of the "Association", the necessary environrrontul study and s-ti:lterent cls required to accompany the State and Federal application·. Bt IT FURTHEF~ Rt.SOLVED that all other required engineering studies and • reports, necessary plans and spocifica1ions for any require~ correction of inti ltration in sewerage collection system, pr0l imlnary plans and specifications, and final plans and specifications for proposed "Associa- tivn" sewerage facil iti.·s, be prepared by the Association Engineer. ..., . E3E IT FURTHER F\LSOLVL:; tt, :t all costs incurred by the "Association" in !' • preparatio;r of neces~,ury studies, reports, data, information, plans • and specifications, Jn~iruction of faci I ities, and all else incidental thereto and nect:ssary to the co~letion of the prop< c·t"d facilities, be certified to t'le "Authority" by the "Association". BE IT FURTHEH Rt.SOLVED that the "Authority" wi II reirrburse the "Association" to the extent of 90% of alI eligible costs; 6E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the President and Business Manager be and ars hereby authorized to enter into a supplerrental agreerrent with the "Authority" which sets forth all details ~-{~~imbursement of el igib'l~ .I· r ! ; j_- costs. .. ·.. '''· . --:~·.. .:. The foregolng is a certified copy of a ,...solution ·f adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Ocean Grove Camp M:Jeting Association at a Special M:leting held October 5, 1973. t4 Q··~- 1 ·:. ···,'' , . ' -2- ·, ./ -· - .. ~··__.,,./_. ' . < ... / Mr. (;Pr<:ltld t'!"lt·t t>d the rollowing ·n,solution and moved its adoption: i I \ miERE.hS the Borough of Bradley Beach, hereinafter referred\ I to as the "Borough", ;ws 14ntered into an "Agreement" dated April 11, 1973 with the Neptune Township Sewerage Au tho ri t y, hereinafter referred to as the ''Authority", and 'WHEREAS the Borough is desirous of obtaining financial aid from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and jrom the Federal .Environmental Protection Agency for deslgn and construct;zon of the facilities required by said "Agreement", and vf.HEREAS the Neptune Township Sewerage Authority has re ceived the Final Priority Rank of JO on the Priority List of Projects for Fiscal Year 1974 as established by the Division of ;tater Resources of the State of New Jersey, Department of Erwi ron- mental Protection, and WHEREAS it is understood that the Authority has been advised that the Borough's sewer facilities requirements as set forth in the said "Agreement" can be included in the Authority's application for grants and in accordance therewith the said \Borough's facilities requirements would be a part of the Authority~s Priority Rank of JO. N JW THEREFORE I II 1 BE iT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the IBorough of Bradley Beach that the Authority be and is hereby authorized to make application, on behalf of the said Borough, for all State and Federal loans and grants, in order to obtain the Borough's 90% financial aid towards all design and construction '. ··~' •' 'j ~' ., of the proposed Burough Sewerage facilities as set forth in the "Agreement" described zn the preambles hereto; and said Authority shall accompl {sh the same by either incorporating and including the Borough's application in the application of the said /1uthority or by separatedocumentatzon therefor, in the event that such. procedure may be required; and said Authority shall transmit the aid aforesaid unto the Borough when received by said Authority. BE JT FURT!i.ER RESOLVED that the Authority shall make the neceRsary and required environmental study, for and on tehalf of the Borough, as a part of its required envi ronment.ll study or as an adjunct thereto by separate study but from the Authority's same source or sources, which shall be submitted as required for receip of 1 oans and grants on behalf of the Borough. B.E IT FUR11iER RESOLVED that applications made by the Authority on behalf of the Borough shall be with the aid of technical data and information prepared by the Borough Engineer. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEV that the Borough, through its ~·- ~ l Engineer, will supply an infiltration/inflow study ard that the I Borough will provide any and all other required engineering studie and reports, necessary plans and specifications for any required ..... correction of infiltration sewerage collection system, JINUITd?,.r~ plans .:J.nd specifications for proposed Borough sewerage jacil ities, II and shall construct all necessary jacil ities and perform all work 1 and services relative to all of the foregoing. All related audit- zng and financing costs, legal fees, costs and expenses and costs requirements relative to any and all of the foregoing shall be supplied by and paid for by the Borough; but any of the foregoing • ' •.T ,...... -~-~- il I shall be deemed a part of the applications to be marie by the nutJzori ty, on behalf of the Borough, to the extent that the same may be deemed eligible costs relative to said loans and grants. BE IT FURTHER &"'SOLVED that the ,Jayor and Clerk be and ar ., l ltereby authorized on behalf of the Borough to enter into a sup- f j plemental agreement with the Authority setting forth all details, :,,ith respect to the provisions of the within resolution and with ~ respect to the Authority transmitting to the Borough all of the grant monies received by the Authority on behalf of said Borough and which said grant monies shall include 90% of all of the eligib~e costs of said Borough, relative to the total projects encomj:;assed herein. Seconded by Mr. Lashovitz and adopted on roll call by the following vote: In the Affirmative:. Mr. Riley, Mr. Gerand and Mr. Lashovitz In the Negative: None CERTIFICATION l, George II. Moffett, Clerk of the Borough of Bradley Beach, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution .- passed by the Board or Commissioners at a meeting held on September 2;), 197:). I' Citvell LHJd('l Ill)' hanu <~liO-Sl'al Of :he this 26th day of September, 1 D7 :). c- II ,0k c ~ ref &( (ttJ j~.0 George II. Moffe1t Borough ( 'lerk - ,. . .-.\ _- : . ' J•.' Ct •nt r·.ll· t .llh! · r1 ' 1 ' ! 11 , · ,. . .1. 11 c· t .. •_!!, , : . I ; l( _. ,_: ~ ~ , t t . .... ] i t ~ ' ' ... . I IH · rtt :rl iL·i, I I i t l C'S :·· !-l .. , . . ·,i t (' i ll _: .1 1 ,, • 1 C r •p ' 1 I 1f / i I t t! t ht • r1 , ,, -! ; . •,) ,..... I d l of 1\vnn ·y- t •• . . t ... l '()I'1j1 1 c tt ~ ~1 n . IL' i :" I;~ ! ' ~ I j • • liHI d 1 t r I I 1 rlf I n\,. I j ''' · .llld it is • ~ 1 • · 1 n ~ · ( · ( · . 11 ' ' 1 r lli•• - ~ · ~ · ,,·-.c il 1· · : Lj (J i l ~ Vl ilS t e l) the J"C· ji ' ll , ll p u m : ' !l ~ · :f!E Pt i\S , it 1 s ,le ·.:r.u I ll t : l>est in t erl~ ; t_ of the H· ·rough o f ,..... d S : •os:.; i hle; .md ;· lW TilL IU·: F0 !\1: , L\ L ·· t:S Ol.VJ:Il b y llll' llor<'U"Il o f 1\von-b y - t ih• -Sea lil.J t l ! ;(' cons u 1 ~ .. n t for 1 I•• · s . tr d 'l '< lW nsll i.p of _., ,. t unc ~~ ~ ''.vE'LVJC' i\ut h ori ty be d!"H I . ' . . . 1 • J • 'ITT.if r -:.1-~ ~L\ ' !·:n Lh:tl l.uthori t y mak e .-tppl icat i0n for s uc h f e lh ~ r a l o r st.lt l' .; rants as may be lV l il .. liJlL• t o ., .. for the .• fnr.~siJid services and the construction and alteration of :\von-by-thi:'-Sea • s facilities e1s required in s.:1ici contract. J,llt"hnrity (a) submit a cost csLirn Se.1 for t~ · ,1h0vc surv0ys, r:,(l c!c to cr 'vc:. r s .1 irl co:-; t s ; . (c) tlwt thi:> R•.:soJ uti0n is not ,._, 'i.1 - - -· - ,