DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

An Annotated List of the Spiders of Indiana 1 Thomas A. Parker, Purdue University Introduction The history of Indiana araneology began in 1847 when Nicholas Marcellus Hentz, the Father of American Araneology, described A galena naevia from Indianapolis (29). Since that time many have contributed to the list of spiders of Indiana. Notable among these contributions are the works of Fox (25), Banks (2), and Elliott (20, 21, 22). Dr. William H. Fox published the first list of Indiana spiders (25), which was based on a collection of a chemistry professor at Purdue Uni- versity, Mr. Frederick C. Test. This list included 79 species of spiders in what would today be 16 families, although family names were not used in this list. Nathan Banks published a preliminary list of Indiana spiders in 1907 (2). This work included keys to the families and genera of spiders and, in addition, a list of species belonging to other arachnid orders. The list of spiders included 148 species found in 16 families, two species of which were described as new to science. The list was based on spiders collected by W. S. Blatchley, Mel T. Cook of Greencastle, W. J. Moenkhaus of Huntingburg, and A. M. Banta who collected spiders in Indiana caves. In 1930 the late Dr. Frank R. Elliott published on spiders of a beech- maple forest near Richmond, Indiana (20). Combining the records of Banks with newly collected material and his beech-maple study, Elliott published a list of Indiana spiders in 1932 (21). This list contained 218 species of spiders found in 20 families. Elliott again published a list of Indiana spiders in 1953 (22). It was based on records in the literature and newly collected material. The work of Lowrie (38, 39) on the spiders of the Chicago area dunes greatly con- tributed to the records of Indiana spiders. Using these records and others, Elliott assembled a list containing 303 species of spiders found in 21 families. No major studies of the spiders of Indiana have been published since Elliott's 1953 list. This paper, then, will enlarge, correct, and update the list of Indiana spiders. The List The present list of Indiana spiders contains 378 species of spiders found in 29 families. The families are arranged following the system used by Kaston (32). The genera are alphabetically arranged in the families and likewise the species in the genera. Nomenclature generally follows 1 Journal Paper No. 3771, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station. 266 Entomology 267 that used by Kaston. Synonyms are included beneath the accepted scien- tific name in cases where name changes have occurred within the last twenty years. The species are numbered consecutively. Collection records are arranged by county with the oldest record pre- ceding all others. The counties are in bold-faced type. Usually the local- ity is given in parenthesis, followed by citations in which the record was found. In instances where no locality was given in the literature or where recent collectors gave no specific locality on their labels, just the citation or date collected and collector's initials are included in the parenthesis. If the record is a recent one, the collection dates and collector's initials are included. Names of collectors may be found in Appendix I. Many of the localities recorded in the older publications no longer exist, having been incorporated into neighboring cities. Other names appearing in the literature were local names and were not formally recog- nized. Appendix II enables the reader to locate such places more accu- rately. Also included in this appendix are a few localities visited by the author or his colleagues for which a more specific geographical description was deemed necessary. The writer's spider collection is housed in the Entomology Depart- ment at Purdue University. All identifications of recent collections were made by the writer. Some verifications were obtained from araneologists in the United States and Canada. Such determinations are credited to these men individually in the text. This list is based on records from the literature and the collection of the writer. This collection represents spi- ders collected during a three-year study of spiders along the Wabash and Tippecanoe Rivers, spiders sent for determination through the Cooperative Extension Service, and specimens collected by students and staff of the Entomology Department at Purdue University. ORDER Araneida Suborder Orthognatha family Atypidae 1. Atypus milberti (Walckenaer), 1837 Crawford (Wyandotte Cave, Sept. 8, 2, 21, 22); Posey (New Harmony, 2, 21, 22); INDIANA (49); Warren (South Pine Creek, May 5, 1968, GRF) family Ctenizidae 2. Aptostichus flavipes Petrunkevitch, 1925 Lawrence (Mitchell, 50, 51, 22) Petrunkevitch (51) reported this species in his Catalogue of American Spiders, Part 1, not in his synonymic index (49), as Elliott (22) has indicated. 3. Pachylomerides audouini (Lucas), 1836 Floyd (Floyd's Knobs, 45); Harrison (Corydon, May 12, 1968, CB) 268 Indiana Academy of Science The specimen from Harrison County was sent to the writer by Jack Washburn, County Agent. It was found in the driveway at the home of Cova Bates. Suborder Labidognatha family Dysderidae 4. Dysdera crocata C. L. Koch, 1839 Whitley (Columbia City, Aug. 28, 1967, RLG); Cass (Logans- port, Mar. 30,1967, TH) family Segestriidae 5. Ariadna bicolor (Hentz), 1842 Tippecanoe (Lafayette, 25, 22); Crawford (Wyandotte, Apr. 17, 2, 21, 22); Lawrence (Mitchell, Apr. 2, 2, 21, 22); Parke (Mec- ca, Apn\ 27, 2, 21, 22); INDIANA (49); Wayne (Richmond, 20, 21, 22); Steuben (Crooked Lake, 21, 22); Porter (Valparaiso, 21, 22) Elliott (22) listed this species from Wyandotte Cave. The original record of Banks (2) was from the town of Wyandotte, not the cave. family Scytodidae 6. Scytodes thoracica (Latrielle), 1804 Wayne (Richmond, 20, 21, 22); White (Brookston, Apr. 22, 1968, TAP); Tippecanoe (West Lafayette, May 16, 1968, TAP) family Loxoscelidae 7. Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch & Mulaik, 1940 Gibson (Princeton, 46); Harrison (Bradford, Oct. U, 1967, TAP) ; Posey (Mount Vernon, Jan. 19, 1968, TAP; Poseyville, May 23, 1968, TAP); Clark (Jeffersonville, Mar. 28, 1968, TAP); Knox (Bruceville, Mar. 18, 1968, RED); Vanderburgh (Evansville, May 28, June 3, 1968, TAP); Dubois (Jasper, June 26,1968, DJM) family Pholcidae 8. Pholcus jihalangioides (Fuesslin) , 1775 Wayne (Richmond, 20, 21, 22); Steuben (Crooked Lake, 21, 22); Tippecanoe (West Lafayette, June 20, 1966, TAP) 9. Spermophora meridionalis Hentz, 1841 Tippecanoe (Ross Biological Reserve, 5) family Theridiidae 10. Asagena americana Emerton, 1882 Tippecanoe (Lafayette, 25, 22; Ross Biological Reserve, 5; Merritt's Pine Plantation, July 11, 1967, RWM); Crawford (Wyandotte, Apr. 17, 2, 21, 22); INDIANA (49); Wayne (Richmond, 20, 21, 22) 11. Conopistha rufa (Walckenaer), 1841 Argyrodes trigonum (Hentz), 1850 Monroe (Mayfield's Cave, 4, 22; Twin Cave, 4, 21) Entomology 269 The Twin Cave record of Banks is from a specimen sent to him by Banta and probably is Banta's "Lower Twin Cave at Mitchell" which is in Lawrence County. 12. Crustulina altera Gertsch & Archer, 1942 C. guttata: (Emerton), 1882 (nee Theridion guttatum Wider, 1834) Wayne (Richmond, 20, 21, 22, 39); Steuben (Crooked Lake, 21, 22); Porter (Valparaiso, 21, 22; Ogden Dunes, 39, 22); Tippe- canoe (Ross Biological Reserve, 5) Elliott (21, 22) listed Crustulina guttata (Wider). Willis J. Gertsch considers our species separate from the European guttata (Wider), hence the name altera. Kaston (32), page 75, says, "In general appearance and structure of the genitalia this species [C. altera] closely resembles gut- tata (Wider), with which, in fact, it may be identical, although Dr. Gertsch thinks not." 13. Ctenium pumilus (Emerton), 1909 Wayne (Richmond, 20, 21, 22) 14. Ctenium riparius (Keyserling), 1886 Knox (May 26, 2, 21, 22); INDIANA (49); Wayne (Richmond, 21, 22); Porter (Ogden Dunes, 39, 22) 15. Enoplognatha marmorata (Hentz), 1850 Marion (Indianapolis, 30, 22); Tippecanoe (Lafayette, 25) 16. Euryopis argentea Emerton, 1882 Porter (Ogden Dunes, 39, 22; Ind. Dunes State Park, 22); Tippecanoe (Ross Biological Reserve, 5) 17. Euryopis limbata (Walckenaer), 1841 E. funebris (Hentz), 1850 Tippecanoe (Lafayette, 25, 22); Posey (New Harmony, June 4, 2, 21, 22); Wayne (Richmond, 20, 21, 22, 39); LaPorte (Smith, 39, 22); Fountain (Attica, Sept. 7, 1967, TAP) 18. Latrodectus mactans (Fabricius), 1775 Tippecanoe (Lafayette, 25, 22); Crawford (Wyandotte, Sept. 9, 2, 21, 22, 35); Lawrence (Mitchell, July 15, 2, 22); Dubois ( Huntingburg, 2, 21, 22); Jennings (North Vernon, Sept. 14, 2, 21, 22); Martin (Shoals, Apr. 22, 2, 21, 22, 35); Floyd (New Albany, May 5, 2, 21, 22); Clark (Charlestown, HS, 35) Banks (2) collected this species at Wyandotte, not in Wyandotte Cave, as Elliott (22) has indicated. 19. Latrodectus variolus Walckenaer, 1837 Putnam (Greencastle, 2, 21, 22, 42); Porter (Dunes Acres, 38, 39, 42; Ogden Dunes, 39, 42); Brown (Aug. 10, 1967, May 1, 1968, JJF) Levi (35) synonymized Latrodectus variolus with L. 7nactans. Actu- ally what is now known as L. variolus was included in Levi's records of L. curacaviensis. McCrone and Levi (42) showed that L. variolus is a valid species based on coloration and ecology. Therefore the records 270 Indiana Academy of Science listed for Latrodectus curacavie?isis for Indiana in Levi's paper are actually L. variolus and are herein listed as such. 20. Lithyphantes albomaculatus (DeGeer), 1778 Porter (Dunes Acres, 38, 39; Ogden Dunes, 39) 21. Steatoda borealis (Hentz), 1850 Tippecanoe (Lafayette, 25, 22; Americus, Aug. 1, 1967, TAP) ; Putnam (Greencastle, 2, 21, 22); Wayne (Richmond, 20, 21, 22, 39); Porter (Valparaiso, 21, 22; Ogden Dunes, 39, 22); LaPorte (Smith, 39, 22); Benton (Otterbein, Apr. 29, 1968, JOS); Pulaski (Winamac, June 16, 1966, Aug. 22, 1967, TAP); Ver- million (Clinton, July 1U, 1966, TAP); Fulton (Rochester, Aug. 29, 1967, TAP) 22. Teutana grossa (C. L. Koch), 1838 Tippecanoe (Ross Biological Reserve, 5) 23.
Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids

    A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids

    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
  • Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden

    Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden

    Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden George Retseck Objectives • Learn about Spiders as Animals • Learn to recognize common spiders to family • Learn about spider ecology • Learn to Collect and Preserve Spiders Kingdom - Animalia Phylum - Arthropoda Subphyla - Mandibulata Chelicerata Class - Arachnida Orders - Acari Opiliones Pseudoscorpiones Araneae Spiders Arachnids of Illinois • Order Acari: Mites and Ticks • Order Opiliones: Harvestmen • Order Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudoscorpions • Order Araneae: Spiders! Acari - Soil Mites Characteriscs of Spiders • Usually four pairs of simple eyes although some species may have less • Six pair of appendages: one pair of fangs (instead of mandibles), one pair of pedipalps, and four pair of walking legs • Spinnerets at the end of the abdomen, which are used for spinning silk threads for a variety of purposes, such as the construction of webs, snares, and retreats in which to live or to wrap prey • 1 pair of sensory palps (often much larger in males) between the first pair of legs and the chelicerae used for sperm transfer, prey manipulation, and detection of smells and vibrations • 1 to 2 pairs of book-lungs on the underside of abdomen • Primitively, 2 body regions: Cephalothorax, Abdomen Spider Life Cycle • Eggs in batches (egg sacs) • Hatch inside the egg sac • molt to spiderlings which leave from the egg sac • grows during several more molts (instars) • at final molt, becomes adult – Some long-lived mygalomorphs (tarantulas) molt after adulthood Phenology • Most temperate
  • SPIDERS of WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI Orrey P. Young Southern Field Crop Insect Management Laboratory USDA-ARS, P.O. Box

    SPIDERS of WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI Orrey P. Young Southern Field Crop Insect Management Laboratory USDA-ARS, P.O. Box

    Young, O . P., T. C . Lockley and G . B . Edwards . 1989 . Spiders of Washington County, Mississippi . J . Arachnol ., 17 :27-41 . SPIDERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI Orrey P. Young Southern Field Crop Insect Management Laboratory USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 346 Stoneville, Mississippi 38776 USA Timothy C. Lockley Imported Fire Ant Station USDA-APHIS-PPQ 3505 25th Avenue Gulfport, Mississippi 39501 USA and G. B. Edwards Florida State Collection of Arthropods Division of Plant Industry Florida Dept. Agric. & Cons . Serv. P.O. Box 1269 Gainesville, Florida 32602 USA ABSTRACT Over a seven-year period, approximately 35,000 spiders representing 26 families, 133 genera, and 234 species were captured in Washington County, Mississippi, by pitfall, sweepnet, vacuum, bag, and hand. Specimens were collected in 10 different habitat types and in four vegetational strata . Old-field habitats yielded the most species (152) and residential lawns the fewest (14) . Considering all habitats sampled, the ground layer produced 111 species, the herbaceous strata 133, the shrub layer 49, and the tree strata 30 species . The sweepnet method of capture obtained 128 species, pitfall 95, hand 61, vacuum 53, and bagging 19 species. The largest number of species were obtained in spring and early summer (maximum of 125 in May), with the fewest in mid-winter (Jan . = 24) . Twenty-one species were considered abundant, 51 common, 67 uncommon, and 95 rare . Additions to the state list of Dorris (1972) number 102 species, for a new state total of 364 species . A comparison with the North American fauna and with other surveys indicates that Washington County is underrepresented both in cursorial forms active on the soil surface and web-spinning forms typical of undisturbed habitats .
  • Effect of Formica Aserva Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on Ground Dwelling Arthropods in Central British Columbia

    Effect of Formica Aserva Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on Ground Dwelling Arthropods in Central British Columbia

    EFFECT OF FORMICA ASERVA FOREL (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) ON GROUND DWELLING ARTHROPODS IN CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA by Kendra Gail Schotzko B.S., University of Idaho, 2008 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES (BIOLOGY) UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA June 2012 © Kendra G. Schotzko, 2012 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1 Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-94131-7 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-94131-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
  • North American Spiders of the Genera Cybaeus and Cybaeina

    North American Spiders of the Genera Cybaeus and Cybaeina

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital... BULLETIN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Volume 23 December, 1932 No. 2 North American Spiders of the Genera Cybaeus and Cybaeina BY RALPH V. CHAMBERLIN and WILTON IVIE BIOLOGICAL SERIES, Vol. II, No. / - PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY THE UNIVERSITY PRESS UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY A Review of the North American Spider of the Genera Cybaeus and Cybaeina By R a l p h V. C h a m b e r l i n a n d W i l t o n I v i e The frequency with which members of the Agelenid genus Cybaeus appeared in collections made by the authors in the mountainous and timbered sections of the Pacific coast region and the representations therein of various apparently undescribed species led to the preparation of this review of the known North American forms. One species hereto­ fore placed in Cybaeus is made the type of a new genus Cybaeina. Most of our species occur in the western states; and it is probable that fur­ ther collecting in this region will bring to light a considerable number of additional forms. The drawings accompanying the paper were made from specimens direct excepting in a few cases where material was not available. In these cases the drawings were copied from the figures published by the authors of the species concerned, as indicated hereafter in each such case, but these drawings were somewhat revised to conform with the general scheme of the other figures in order to facilitate comparison.
  • Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (Online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (Print) the Journal Is Available on Line At

    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (Online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (Print) the Journal Is Available on Line At

    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.biotaxa.org/em New faunistic data on the cave-dwelling spiders in the Balkan Peninsula (Araneae) MARIA V. NAUMOVA1, STOYAN P. LAZAROV2, BOYAN P. PETROV2, CHRISTO D. DELTSHEV2 1Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1, Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, E-mail: [email protected] 2National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1, Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Corresponding author: Christo Deltshev Received 15 October 2016 │ Accepted 7 November 2016 │ Published online 9 November 2016. Abstract The contribution summarizes previously unpublished data and adds records of newly collected cave-dwelling spiders from the Balkan Peninsula. New data on the distribution of 91 species from 16 families, found in 157 (27 newly established) underground sites (caves and artificial galleries) are reported due to 337 original records. Twelve species are new to the spider fauna of the caves of the Balkan Peninsula. The species Histopona palaeolithica (Brignoli, 1971) and Hoplopholcus longipes (Spassky, 1934) are reported for the first time for the territory of Balkan Peninsula, Centromerus cavernarum (L. Koch, 1872), Diplocephalus foraminifer (O.P.-Cambridge, 1875) and Lepthyphantes notabilis Kulczyński, 1887 are new for the fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cataleptoneta detriticola Deltshev & Li, 2013 is new for the fauna of Greece, Asthenargus bracianus Miller, 1938 and Centromerus europaeus (Simon, 1911) are new for the fauna of Montenegro and Syedra gracilis (Menge, 1869) is new for the fauna of Turkey.
  • Caracterização Proteometabolômica Dos Componentes Da Teia Da Aranha Nephila Clavipes Utilizados Na Estratégia De Captura De Presas

    Caracterização Proteometabolômica Dos Componentes Da Teia Da Aranha Nephila Clavipes Utilizados Na Estratégia De Captura De Presas

    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS – RIO CLARO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS BIOLOGIA CELULAR E MOLECULAR Caracterização proteometabolômica dos componentes da teia da aranha Nephila clavipes utilizados na estratégia de captura de presas Franciele Grego Esteves Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio . Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Biologia Celular e Molecular. Rio Claro São Paulo - Brasil Março/2017 FRANCIELE GREGO ESTEVES CARACTERIZAÇÃO PROTEOMETABOLÔMICA DOS COMPONENTES DA TEIA DA ARANHA Nephila clavipes UTILIZADOS NA ESTRATÉGIA DE CAPTURA DE PRESA Orientador: Prof. Dr. Mario Sergio Palma Co-Orientador: Dr. José Roberto Aparecido dos Santos-Pinto Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências da Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” - Campus de Rio Claro-SP, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Biologia Celular e Molecular. Rio Claro 2017 595.44 Esteves, Franciele Grego E79c Caracterização proteometabolômica dos componentes da teia da aranha Nephila clavipes utilizados na estratégia de captura de presas / Franciele Grego Esteves. - Rio Claro, 2017 221 f. : il., figs., gráfs., tabs., fots. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências de Rio Claro Orientador: Mario Sergio Palma Coorientador: José Roberto Aparecido dos Santos-Pinto 1. Aracnídeo. 2. Seda de aranha. 3. Glândulas de seda. 4. Toxinas. 5. Abordagem proteômica shotgun. 6. Abordagem metabolômica. I. Título. Ficha Catalográfica elaborada pela STATI - Biblioteca da UNESP Campus de Rio Claro/SP Dedico esse trabalho à minha família e aos meus amigos. Agradecimentos AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço a Deus primeiramente por me fortalecer no dia a dia, por me capacitar a enfrentar os obstáculos e momentos difíceis da vida.
  • Frontenac Provincial Park

    Frontenac Provincial Park

    FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK One Malaise trap was deployed at Frontenac Provincial Park in 2014 (44.51783, -76.53944, 176m ASL; Figure 1). This trap collected arthropods for twenty weeks from May 9 – September 25, 2014. All 10 Malaise trap samples were processed; every other sample was analyzed using the individual specimen protocol while the second half was analyzed via bulk analysis. A total of 3372 BINs were obtained. Half of the BINs captured were flies (Diptera), followed by bees, ants and wasps (Hymenoptera), moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera), and true bugs (Hemiptera; Figure 2). In total, 750 arthropod species were named, representing 24.6% of the BINs from the site (Appendix 1). All but 1 of the BINs were assigned Figure 1. Malaise trap deployed at Frontenac at least to family, and 58.2% were assigned to a genus Provincial Park in 2014. (Appendix 2). Specimens collected from Frontenac represent 232 different families and 838 genera. Diptera Hymenoptera Lepidoptera Hemiptera Coleoptera Trombidiformes Psocodea Trichoptera Araneae Mesostigmata Entomobryomorpha Thysanoptera Neuroptera Orthoptera Sarcoptiformes Blattodea Mecoptera Odonata Symphypleona Ephemeroptera Julida Opiliones Figure 2. Taxonomy breakdown of BINs captured in the Malaise trap at Frontenac. APPENDIX 1. TAXONOMY REPORT Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona obesa Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna annulipes Emblyna sublata Gnaphosidae Cesonia Cesonia bilineata Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus fissiceps Pityohyphantes Pityohyphantes
  • SOME SPIDERS from NORTHERN LOUISIANA. by NATHAN BANKS

    SOME SPIDERS from NORTHERN LOUISIANA. by NATHAN BANKS

    188 ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY misnomer. Mr. Pratt remarked that the collectors for Messrs. Godman and Salvin had no time to study habits, since they were told simply to collect as much material as possible. Mr. Banks presented the following paper : SOME SPIDERS FROM NORTHERN LOUISIANA. By NATHAN BANKS. During the summer of 1891 I gathered a small collection of spiders from the vicinity of Shreveport, Louisiana. Although there are few peculiar or strange species in the collection, still it is of some interest, as so little is at present known of the distribu tion of our spiders. Yet there are several uncommon species, at least uncommon to one acquainted chiefly with more northern forms. Such are the Prodidomus rufus, Tetragonophthalma dubia, Acartauchcnius texana, and Thargalia aurata. Two species quite rare in the North are Histiagonia rostrata and Ballus youngi. About 127 species are recorded in this list, distributed in twenty-one families. The collection is representative of the southern Mississippi Valley fauna. This differs from the South Atlantic fauna in having some southwestern species. Seven to be nsw and are here described a species appear ; few others, principally in the Lycosidse, may prove to be new when the southern forms of this family are better known. THERAPHOSID^E. DRASSID^E. Eurypelma hentzi Girard. Gnaphosa sericata Koch. Drassns bicolor Htz. SCYTODID^:. Cesonia bilineata Htz. Loxosceles rufipes Duf. Prosthesima depressa Em. FlLISTATIDyE. Prosthesima atra Htz. Filistata hibernalis Hentz. Megamyrmecion lepidium n. sp. DYSDERID^E. CLUBIONID^E. Ariadne bicolor Hentz. Clubiona obesa Hentz. Clubiona abboti Koch. Chiracanthium inclusa Hentz. Thalamia Hentz. parietalis Anyphaena gracilis Hentz.
  • A New Spider Genus (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae) from a Tropical Montane Cloud Forest of Mexico

    A New Spider Genus (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae) from a Tropical Montane Cloud Forest of Mexico

    European Journal of Taxonomy 731: 97–116 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.731.1207 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2021 · Ibarra-Núñez G. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EFF0D93-EF7D-4943-BEBF-995E25D34544 A new spider genus (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae) from a tropical montane cloud forest of Mexico Guillermo IBARRA-NÚÑEZ 1,*, David CHAMÉ-VÁZQUEZ 2 & Julieta MAYA-MORALES 3 1,2,3 El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Tapachula. Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto km 2.5, Apdo. Postal 36, Tapachula, Chiapas 30700, Mexico. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:61F4CDEF-04B8-4F8E-83DF-BFB576205F7A 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:CDA7A4DA-D0CF-4445-908A-3096B1C8D55D 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:BE1F67AB-94A6-45F7-A311-8C99E16139BA Abstract. A new genus and species of spider (Araneae, Linyphiidae, Erigoninae) from a tropical montane cloud forest of Mexico is described from both male and female specimens, Xim trenzado gen. et sp. nov. A phylogenetic parsimony analysis situates Xim gen. nov. as a distinct genus among the distal Erigoninae. Xim gen. nov. is sister to a clade including Ceratinopsis, Tutaibo and Sphecozone, but differs from those genera by having a high cymbium, large paracymbium, short straight embolus, male cheliceral stridulatory striae widely and evenly spaced, both sexes with a post-ocular lobe, male with two series of prolateral macrosetae on femur I, and the female by having strongly oblong, u-shaped spermathecae.
  • SA Spider Checklist

    SA Spider Checklist

    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
  • WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T

    WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T

    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, C07C 39/00 (2006.01) C07D 303/32 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, C07C 49/242 (2006.01) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (21) International Application Number: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PCT/US20 16/048092 PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (22) International Filing Date: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 22 August 2016 (22.08.2016) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (30) Priority Data: TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, 62/208,662 22 August 2015 (22.08.2015) US TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (71) Applicant: NEOZYME INTERNATIONAL, INC.