Traff Ic Restr Ic T Io Ns

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Traff Ic Restr Ic T Io Ns 2010-02-26 TRAFFIC RES RESTRICTIONS TO NAVIGATION SWEDEN KARLSBORG – SKELLEFTEHAMN: minimum 4000 dwt and ice class 1A HOLMSUND – ÖRNSKÖLDSVIK, ÅNGERMANÄLVEN: minimum 2000 dwt ice class 1A HÄRNÖSAND – SUNDSVALL: 2000dwt, ice class 1A. STOCKA – SKUTSKÄR: minimum 2000 dwt and ice class 1B HARGSHAMN – HALLSTAVIK: minimum 1300 dwt and ice class 1C, or mini- mum 2000 dwt and ice class 2 LAKE MÄLAREN: minimum 1300 dwt and ice class 1B or minimum 2000 dwt and ice class 1C STOCKHOLM – KALMAR: minimum 1300 dwt and ice class 1C, or minimum 2000 dwt and ice class 2 GÖTA RIVER, TROLLHÄTTE CANAL, LAKE VÄNERN: minimum 1300 dwt and ice class 1B or minimum 2000 dwt and ice class 1C Alterations valid from February 27: HOLMSUND: minimum 3000 dwt and ice class 1A HUDIKSVALL – SKUTSKÄR: minimum 2000 dwt and ice class 1A TRICTIONS HARGSHAMN, HALLSTAVIK, GRISSLEHAMN: minimum 2000 dwt and ice class 1C THE QUARK, WESTERN PART: Transit traffic prohibited ÖREGRUNDSGREPEN and KALMARSUND: Transit traffic not advisable Coastal from STRÖMSTAD to BERGKVARA: Traffic for low powered vessels not advisable FREJ assists in northern Bay of Bothnia ATLE assists in The Quark YMER assist in northern Sea of Bothnia BALDER VIKING assists in southern Sea of Bothnia TOR VIKING and VIDAR VIKING assists in southern Sea of Bothnia and Ålands Sea BALTICA assists in northern Kalmarsund ALE, SCANDICA and tug DYNAN assist in Lake Vänern and Göta River FINLAND TORNIO, KEMI, OULU, RAAHE: minimum 4000 dwt and ice class 1A KOKKOLA, PIETARSAARI: minimum 3000 dwt and ice class 1A VAASA, KASKINEN: minimum 2000 dwt and ice class 1A PORI, RAUMA, UUSIKAUPUNKI : minimum 2000 dwt and ice class 1B TURKU, NAANTALI, HANKO, KOVERHAR: minimum 2000 dwt ice class 1B, or minimum 3000 dwt ice class 1C SMHI Ice Service E-mail [email protected] Phone +46 (0) 11 495 85 33 Fax +46 (0) 11 495 80 53 INKOO, KANTVIK, HELSINKI, PORVOO: minimum 2000 dwt and ice class 1A LOVIISA, KOTKA and HAMINA: minimum 2000 dwt and iceclass 1A Alterations valid from March 1: KOKKOLA, PIETARSAARI: minimum 4000 dwt and ice class 1A Minimum load and discharge, valid from March 1 : TORNIO, KEMI, OULU, RAAHE, KOKKOLA, PIETARSAARI: 2000 ton KONTIO and OTSO assist in northern Bay of Bothnia URHO assists in central Bay of Bothnia, FENNICA in southern Bay of Bothnia ZEUS assists in southern Sea of Bothnia and in Archipelago Sea SISU, VOIMA and NORDICA assist in Gulf of Finland RUSSIA and ESTONIA Please visit www.baltice.org VESSELS NOT SUITABLE FOR WINTER NAVIGATION, RIVER VESSELS AND TUGS WITH BARGE CAN NOT EXPECT GOVERNMENTAL ICE- BREAKER ASSISTANCE. VESSELS BOUND FOR PORTS SUBJECT TO TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS IN GULF OF BOTHNIA SHALL, WHEN PASSING GOTSKA SANDÖN, 58-25N 19-10E, REPORT TO ICEINFO ON VHF CHANNEL 65. ARRIVAL REPORT IS TO BE MADE TO ICEINFO, ON VHF CHANNEL 16, WHEN THE SHIP IS WELL MOORED, INCLUDING SHIP’S NAME, ETD AND NEXT PORT OF DESTINATION. DEPARTURE REPORT IS TO BE MADE TO ICEINFO , ON VHF CHANNEL 16, LATEST 6 HOURS BEFORE DEPARTURE. SMHI Ice Service E-mail [email protected] Phone +46 (0) 11 495 85 33 Fax +46 (0) 11 495 80 53 .
Recommended publications
  • Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2015-2016
    BALTIC ICEBREAKING MANAGEMENT Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2015-2016 1 Table of contents 1. Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Overview of the icebreaking season (2015-2016) and its effect on the maritime transport system in the Baltic Sea region ........................................................................................................................................ 5 4. Accidents and incidents in sea ice ......................................................................................................... 12 5. Winter Navigation Research .................................................................................................................. 12 6. Costs of Icebreaking services in the Baltic Sea ...................................................................................... 12 6.1 Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 12 6.2 Sweden ................................................................................................................................................ 12 6.3 Russia ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2012-2013
    BALTIC ICEBREAKING MANAGEMENT Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2012-2013 1 Table of contents 1. Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Overview of the icebreaking season (2012-2013) and its effect on the maritime transport system in the Baltic Sea region ........................................................................................................................................ 5 4. Costs of Icebreaking services in the Baltic Sea ...................................................................................... 12 4.1 Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 12 4.2 Sweden ................................................................................................................................................ 12 4.4. Estonia ................................................................................................................................................ 13 4.5 Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Germany ............................................................................................... 13 4.6 Denmark .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public the Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Finnish Waters Deliverable No. D WP6 5 01 Date
    Title Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea Acronym EfficienSea Document Access: Public The Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Finnish Waters Part A: The Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Open Water Part B: The Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Winter Navigation Deliverable No. D_WP6_5_01 Date: 21.10.2011 Contract No. 013 efficiensea.org Part-financed by the European Union Public DOCUMENT STATUS Authors Name Organisation Kati Westerlund Finnish Transport Agency Reviewing/Approval of report Name Organisation Signature Date Tommi Arola FTA Tuomas Martikainen FTA Document History Revision Date Organisatio Initials Revised Short description of n pages changes 1 19.11.2010 FTA First draft of Part A 2 30.11.2010 FTA Part A: Corrections, diagrams, additional text 3 31.03.2011 FTA Appendix 4 Part A: Additional statistics and text 4 06.04.2011 FTA First draft of Part B 5 05.07.2011 FTA Front page Combined two reports 6 21.10.2011 FTA Combined common parts of Part A and Part B. Combined the text ‘Background’ from both reports to the one single. efficiensea.org Part-financed by the European Union Public Abbreviations/Definitions AIS Automatic Identification System COLREG Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea CPA Closest Point of Approach DW Deep Water (Route) DWT Dead Weight Tonnes GOFREP The Mandatory Ship Reporting System in the Gulf of Finland OOW Officer of the Watch SRS Ship Reporting System TSS Traffic Separation Scheme TSZ Traffic Separation Zone VTS Vessel Traffic Service VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (Teknologian tutkimuskeskus VTT; Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuslaitos until 1st December 2010) efficiensea.org Part-financed by the European Union Public TableofContents Abbreviations/Definitions .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Challenges Faced by Arctic Ships
    NTIS # PB2011- SSC-461 STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES FACED BY ARCTIC SHIPS This document has been approved For public release and sale; its Distribution is unlimited SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE 2011 Ship Structure Committee RADM P.F. Zukunft RDML Thomas Eccles U. S. Coast Guard Assistant Commandant, Chief Engineer and Deputy Commander Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security For Naval Systems Engineering (SEA05) and Stewardship Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Mr. H. Paul Cojeen Dr. Roger Basu Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Senior Vice President American Bureau of Shipping Mr. Christopher McMahon Mr. Victor Santos Pedro Director, Office of Ship Construction Director Design, Equipment and Boating Safety, Maritime Administration Marine Safety, Transport Canada Mr. Kevin Baetsen Dr. Neil Pegg Director of Engineering Group Leader - Structural Mechanics Military Sealift Command Defence Research & Development Canada - Atlantic Mr. Jeffrey Lantz, Mr. Edward Godfrey Commercial Regulations and Standards for the Director, Structural Integrity and Performance Division Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship Dr. John Pazik Mr. Jeffery Orner Director, Ship Systems and Engineering Research Deputy Assistant Commandant for Engineering and Division Logistics SHIP STRUCTURE SUB-COMMITTEE AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING (ABS) DEFENCE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CANADA ATLANTIC Mr. Craig Bone Dr. David Stredulinsky Mr. Phil Rynn Mr. John Porter Mr. Tom Ingram MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (MARAD) MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND (MSC) Mr. Chao Lin Mr. Michael W. Touma Mr. Richard Sonnenschein Mr. Jitesh Kerai NAVY/ONR / NAVSEA/ NSWCCD TRANSPORT CANADA Mr. David Qualley / Dr. Paul Hess Natasa Kozarski Mr. Erik Rasmussen / Dr. Roshdy Barsoum Luc Tremblay Mr. Nat Nappi, Jr. Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Finnish Soldier Vs Soviet Soldier : Winter War 1939-40
    FINNISH SOLDIER VS SOVIET SOLDIER : WINTER WAR 1939-40 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK David Campbell | 80 pages | 20 Oct 2016 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781472813244 | English | New York, United Kingdom Finnish Soldier vs Soviet Soldier : Winter War 1939-40 PDF Book Combat Series. Elsewhere on the frontier, Finnish ski troops used the rugged landscape to conduct hit-and-run attacks on isolated Soviet units. The very first day of the offensive was a victory. You are commenting using your Facebook account. The Finns resisted German pressure to participate fully in the Axis attack on the beleaguered Soviet-held city of Leningrad, and the Continuation War came to be characterized by trench warfare and unconventional operations conducted by both sides behind the front lines. Learn how your comment data is processed. This kind of oil would not freeze and had a viscosity rate which made it suitable for all types of automatic arms. Product 38 of Bolt Action: Ostfront: Barbarossa to Berlin. World War 1 History. Along these roads as well, the advance of only one division was regarded as possible. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Delivery time: 1 - 3 days. While the Finns put up a spirited resistance during the winter of , their troops were ultimately no match for the sheer immensity of the Red Army. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! Welcome to what might humbly be described as the greatest military history blog on Tumblr. The most advantageous from this operational point of view were bridges and embankments which were difficult to bypass.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2017-2018
    BALTIC ICEBREAKING MANAGEMENT Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2017-2018 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Overview of the icebreaking season (2017-2018) and its effect on the maritime transport system in the Baltic Sea region ........................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Accidents and incidents in sea ice ........................................................................................................... 9 4. Winter Navigation Research .................................................................................................................... 9 5. Costs of Icebreaking services in the Baltic Sea ...................................................................................... 10 5.1 Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 10 5.2 Sweden ................................................................................................................................................ 10 5.3 Russia ................................................................................................................................................... 10 5.4. Estonia ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation-Based Assessment of the Operational Performance of the Finnish–Swedish Winter Navigation System
    applied sciences Article Simulation-Based Assessment of the Operational Performance of the Finnish–Swedish Winter Navigation System Martin Bergström * and Pentti Kujala Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland; pentti.kujala@aalto.fi * Correspondence: martin.bergstrom@aalto.fi; Tel.: +358-50-476-7229 Received: 15 August 2020; Accepted: 24 September 2020; Published: 27 September 2020 Abstract: This article presents a discrete event simulation-based approach for assessing the operating performance of the Finnish–Swedish Winter Navigation System (FSWNS) under different operating scenarios. Different operating scenarios are specified in terms of ice conditions, the volume of maritime traffic, number of icebreakers (IBs), and regulations such as the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI). Considered performance indicators include transport capacity, number of instances of icebreaker (IB) assistance, and IB waiting times. The approach is validated against real-world data on maritime traffic in the Bothnian Bay. In terms of the number of ship arrivals per port, indicating the transport capacity of the FSWNS, the simulation agrees well with the data. In terms of the number of instances of IB assistance and IB waiting times per port, the standard deviations between the mean of 35 independent simulation runs and the data are 13% and 18%, respectively. A sensitivity analysis indicates that the simulated number of instances of IB assistance and IB waiting times is particularly sensitive to assumptions concerning the presence of brash ice channels. Case studies indicate that, unless the number of IBs is increased, the EEDI regulations may result in a significant increase in both the number of instances of IB assistance and the cumulated IB waiting times.
    [Show full text]
  • Icebreaker Polaris Begins Work Page 10
    Aker Arctic Technology Inc Newsletter March 2017 Arctic Passion News 1 / 2017 / 13 Icebreaker Polaris begins work Page 10 Icebreaking needs and Model testing of Ice Harmonising model tests plans on the Northern Strengthened Lifeboat for power requirements Sea Route Page 11 Page 14 Page 4 Aker Arctic Technology Inc Newsletter March 2017 In this issue Page 2 From the Managing Director Dear Reader, Page 3 Finland to chair the Arctic Council Page 4 Icebreaking needs on the NSR The year 2017 is quite significant for Page 8 Will EEDI become tighter Finland when it comes to Arctic matters, Page 9 Polar Code training as Finland is taking the chairmanship in Page 10 Polaris begins work the Arctic Council, and the same year Page 11 Ice strengthened lifeboat celebrating the nation's centenary of testing independence. This results in a number Page 12 Basics about ice part 1 of special events that also affect our Page 14 Harmonising model tests businesses in the Arctic region. Although Page 16 Intelligent de-icing Aker Arctic is focusing on technical Page 17 News in brief matters and development of the Page 20 Christmas party in Åland solutions to be used in both Arctic and Meet us here other icebreaking vessels, administrative actions are of much interest to us. This year will show how the major and Announcements pioneering Arctic project, Sabetta Regulatory issues are developing. terminal, the first ever real Arctic LNG Alexey Shtrek has This is the first year of polar code project, is coming onstream. This project joined Aker Arctic as development implementation, and we also see is a great showcase of how the new manager.
    [Show full text]
  • 20.8.2014 Kalervo Jolma, Heli Haapasaari Pollution Response Finnish Environment Institute
    20.8.2014 Kalervo Jolma, Heli Haapasaari Pollution response Finnish Environment Institute Oil and chemical spill response in Finland- Current situation In autumn 2009 the Government presented to the Parliament the "Challenges of the Baltic Sea and Baltic Sea Policy" report. The report includes all the main factors that SYKE had indicated in its development plan as the measures needed in order to enhance the marine pollution response capability during years 2009-2018. The Government has set following target spills that Finland together with neighbouring countries should be able to recover in three day in open water conditions and in 10 day in ice conditions: Gulf of Finland 30 000 tonnes, Archipelago Sea 15 000 tonnes (due to deepened route this target value has been later set to 20 000 tonnes) and Gulf of Bothnia 5 000 tonnes. In archipelago and coastal areas oil spill response measures must be able to prevent oil from drifting into the inner archipelago and recovering the oil within a month. In coastal areas the objective is to clean most of the shoreline within three months of the accident. These targets should be achieved by year 2015. Below is a list of the enhancements that have already have been implemented or which will be implemented in near future: - New Act on Oil Pollution Response came into force in January 2010. (http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2009/en20091673.pdf). New decree came into force in April 2014. - The renewal of the four regional and 22 local contingency plans will take place 2014-2016. - Navy's oil spill response vessel HALLI´s modernization (12 million €) was completed in summer 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2016-2017
    BALTIC ICEBREAKING MANAGEMENT Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2016-2017 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Overview of the icebreaking season (2016-2017) and its effect on the maritime transport system in the Baltic Sea region ........................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Accidents and incidents in sea ice ......................................................................................................... 10 4. Winter Navigation Research .................................................................................................................. 10 5. Costs of Icebreaking services in the Baltic Sea ...................................................................................... 10 6.1 Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 10 6.2 Sweden ................................................................................................................................................ 10 6.3 Russia ................................................................................................................................................... 11 6.4. Estonia ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Solutions for the Entire Icebreaking Value Chain
    FINNISH SOLUTIONS FOR THE ENTIRE ICEBREAKING VALUE CHAIN AN AMERICAN-FINNISH PARTNERSHIP 2 3 4 FINNISH SOLUTIONS FOR THE ENTIRE ICEBREAKING VALUE CHAIN TABLE OF 6 ICEBREAKING SOLUTIONS DELIVERED ON TIME AND ON BUDGET CONTENTS 8 THE POLAR MARITIME NETWORK IN FINLAND 12 RESEARCH 12 AALTO UNIVERSITY 14 DESIGN 14 AKER ARCTIC 18 BUILD 18 RAUMA MARINE CONSTRUCTIONS 22 OPERATE 22 ARCTIA 26 EQUIPMENT & SYSTEM SUPPLIERS / DIGITAL SERVICE PROVIDERS 28 LAMOR 30 ABB 32 NESTIX 34 WÄRTSILÄ 38 TRAFOTEK 40 MARIOFF 42 STARKICE 44 ICEYE 46 CRAFTMER 48 PEMAMEK 50 STEERPROP 52 NAVIDIUM 54 DANFOSS 56 POLARIS: THE FIRST LNG-POWERED ICEBREAKER IN THE WORLD 58 BENEFITS OF AN AMERICAN-FINNISH PARTNERSHIP PHOTO BY TIM BIRD 4 5 Finnish companies have designed about 80 percent of the world’s icebreakers, and about 60 percent of them have been built by Finnish shipyards. We have a creative and FINNISH agile polar maritime network that is known for delivering on schedule and on budget. We are also known for delivering sustainable, innovative and effective solutions SOLUTIONS for demanding tasks in Arctic conditions. Finland is the only nation in the world that offers ice- proven products and services with a solid, cost-effective FOR THE ENTIRE value chain. This value chain covers R&D, education, ship design, engineering, building, operation, program management and life cycle support services. Globally ICEBREAKING recognized Finnish companies and shipyards offer icebreaking solutions for the U.S polar icebreaker program that can be considered as a complete package or VALUE CHAIN configured as individual options to suit specific needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Notes
    The Winter War The Soviet Union’s Invasion of Finland (1939-40) The Second World War was a vast conflict with hard-fought clashes in places such as Stalingrad, Normandy, North Africa, Italy and the Pacific Theater. These operations are discussed in a hundreds of books and can be found on an infinite number of websites. Their names conjure up noble images of heroism and the sacrifice as well as the more sobering imagery of destruction and death. For 105 days, the tiny nation of Finland fought a war that typically merits only a footnote in a history book, or a passing remark in a WWII documentary. Taking on the vast manpower of the Soviet army, the Finns put up a fanatical defense of their homeland, inflicting horrific casualties on the invading Soviet army. Eventually the overwhelming number of Soviet troops and tanks sent into Finland forced the Finns to sue for peace, but they walked away from the conflict with their much bigger neighbor with their independence and national pride intact. Their struggle influenced the landscape and direction of the entire world war that followed, and perhaps the outcome as well. The winds of war were beginning to drift across the world during 1930’s. Japan sought to secure territory to increase its sources of raw materials and expand its empire. Hitler’s power and ambitious plans were ever growing storm clouds on the European horizon, threatening to overtake the entire continent and dragging a very reluctant America into the fray. The Russian Bear in the East also sought to exert its influence, all the while casting a wary eye towards Hitler’s Germany and the conflict Stalin knew would eventually come to pass between them.
    [Show full text]