DOCSLIB.ORG

THE YEAR 2016 01 • the YEAR 2016 • New in 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE YEAR 2016 01 • the YEAR 2016 • New in 2016 THE YEAR 2016 01 • THE YEAR 2016 • New in 2016 ..................................................................................................04 Arctia 2016 • The year 2016 in figures .............................................................................. 05 • CEO’s review ..................................................................................................06 02 • ARCTIA • Operating environment ...............................................................................08 • Core messages and organisation .................................................................12 • Corporate social responsibility management .............................................17 • Financial responsibility .................................................................................21 • Society and human rights ............................................................................24 RELIABLE SERVICES • Environment .................................................................................................27 03 • SERVICE AREAS IN ARCTIC CONDITIONS • Icebreaking services ......................................................................................33 • Offshore services ...........................................................................................36 Arctia’s main mission is to safeguard icebreaking • Oil recovery services ......................................................................................38 • Harbour icebreaking .....................................................................................39 operations and winter navigation in the Finnish marine • Arctia Events .................................................................................................40 areas. We offer our customers reliable maritime services 04 • PERSONNEL AND GOVERNANCE • Personnel and governance ...........................................................................43 in challenging conditions throughout the world. • Competence and expertise ...........................................................................47 In 2016, we achieved all service targets set for • Fleet ...............................................................................................................50 us in the Baltic Sea. We also represented and 05 • FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2016 • Annual report ................................................................................................52 promoted Finland’s unique Arctic expertise worldwide. • Income statement .........................................................................................60 • Balance sheet ................................................................................................61 • Cash flow statement .....................................................................................63 • Notes to the financial statements ................................................................64 • Auditor’s report .............................................................................................77 • Principles of CSR reporting ...........................................................................79 • Stakeholders and their expectations ...........................................................80 • List of CSR reporting requirements ..............................................................81 THE YEAR 2016 ARCTIA SERVICE AREAS PERSONNEL AND GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 02 FLEET MODERNISATION AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAMME UNDERWAY In summer 2016, icebreaker Voima underwent THE YEAR 2016 a ten-year life span extension in which, e.g. the navigation equipment on the bridge was replaced. 01 In the autumn, the new-generation icebreaker Polaris, designed for the most challenging conditions in the Baltic Sea, joined our fleet. DIVERSE OFFSHORE EXPERTISE Icebreaker Otso provided assistance in a seismic survey of the seafloor in the waters along the North-East coast of Greenland in August– September 2016. In 2016, Arctia investigated the service needs of operators carrying out scientific research in the polar regions or those interested in doing so, and took the initiative of launching HARBOUR ICEBREAKING THROUGHOUT THE BOTHNIAN ARC In April 2016, Arctia Karhu Ltd expanded its operations to the entire Bothnian Arc when it signed a contract on escort tug services with the Port of Luleå. Image: Patrik Raski THE YEAR 2016 ARCTIA SERVICE AREAS PERSONNEL AND GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 03 2016 New in Polaris joins Ahto now also Life span of Changes in the the fleet assisting in Luleå Voima extended STCW Code increase training needs The world’s first LNG icebreaker Pola- In April 2016, Arctia Karhu Ltd and The icebreaker Voima spent the The training organised by Arctia for ris joined Arctia’s fleet in September the Port of Luleå signed a contract on rest of the summer 2016 in Naantali its sea personnel in 2016 focused on 2016. This unique vessel uses both escort tug services in the open water where it underwent a major life span the renewal of qualifications and liquefied natural gas (LNG) and low- season. Arctia hopes that the con- extension. For example, its bottom refresher training due to changes sulphur diesel as fuel. The use of LNG tract is a beginning of long-standing was fitted with about 250 tonnes made in the international STCW Code significantly reduces the vessel’s emis- cooperation with the Port of Luleå. of new sheet metal and the naviga- (International Convention on Stand- sions. Polaris is the most eco-effi- For the port, the contract is part of tion equipment on the bridge was ards of Training, Certification and cient diesel-electric icebreaker in the the Malmporten project. Channels replaced. The lifetime of the vessel Watchkeeping for Seafarers). The world. It started its operation as a leading to the port are dredged to was increased by ten years with the extensive training schedule organ- Baltic Sea icebreaker in January 2017. allow access to larger Panamax and life span extension. Arctia donated ised by the employer in a centralised The EU supported the construction of post-Panamax class vessels. Larger two of Voima’s old engine order tel- way offered new aspects into increas- Polaris with TEN-T funding. ships need escort tug services, and egraphs to maritime museums. The ingly safe operating methods even the contract between Arctia Karhu modernisation of Voima was part for the most experienced seafarers. Ltd and the Port of Luleå will meet of the WINMOS II project, and it In 2017, the sea personnel is able this need. was partly funded by the European to continue working with updated Union’s Connecting Europe Facility qualifications and knowledge. The (CEF) for Transport. changes in the STCW Code will have an impact on the training needs of sea personnel also in the future. Image: Patrik Raski Image: Timo Aaltonen THE YEAR 2016 ARCTIA SERVICE AREAS PERSONNEL AND GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 04 1 January 2016 7 May 2016 27 September 2016 8 December 2016 Due to restructuring of the Group, Icebreaking season 2015–2016 ends IB Otso returns Icebreaking season 2016–2017 starts Arctia Shipping Ltd to be known as as Kontio returns to Katajanokka from Greenland after Otso leaves Katajanokka for Arctia Ltd as from this date from the Bay of Bothnia the Bay of Bothnia 2016 11 April 2016 28 May 2016 28 September 2016 New contract for Arctia Karhu Ltd Life span extension of IB Voima started IB Polaris joins Arctia’s fleet Staff Result of the Total Turnover Operating profit financial period Gross investment Return on capital invested 273 MEUR MEUR MEUR MEUR % 265 261 75 25 25 150 2016 Sea personnel 70 20 20 120 237 5.7 233 230 65 15 15 90 Office personnel 60 10 10 60 36 55 5 5 30 2015 32 31 50 0 0 0 11.8 14 15 16 14 15 16 14 15 16 14 15 16 Operating days Baltic Sea 2016 60.7 2016 12.9 2016 9.1 2016 131.6* 175 2014 385 338 11.3 2015 2015 2015 2015 Offshore 64.4 18.1 14.6 14.8 380 2014 2014 2014 2014 2016 2015 2014 61 78 61.7 16.8 12.9 15.6 *Polaris THE YEAR 2016 ARCTIA SERVICE AREAS PERSONNEL AND GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 05 on market terms, and it has a significant basic value of state enterprises. Arctia is impact on the company’s balance sheet. the first Finnish shipping company to pro- CEO’s review The vessel is the most eco-efficient ice- vide a regular public report on corporate breaker of all time as it uses liquefied nat- responsibility. Financial responsibility is ural gas, LNG, as fuel in addition to ultra- born by safeguarding the company’s self- low-sulphur diesel. In terms of its technical sufficiency and development possibilities properties, Polaris has turned out to be with long-term partnerships. Environmen- THE SEAS ARE an excellent icebreaker for the Baltic Sea, tal responsibility is constantly developed able to work efficiently in changing and with new technical solutions, e.g. utilising demanding ice conditions. environmentally friendly fuel technology. CHANGING The life span of the oldest vessel in our We assume our social responsibility by tak- fleet, icebreaker Voima, was extended in ing care of the continuity and develop- the summer. The modernised vessel will ment of human capital with training and In 2016, the Arctia Group’s performance be able to carry on its icebreaking duties mentoring. The number of occupational remained at a good level and the operational for the next ten years. Harbour icebreaker accidents fell in 2016 as a result of tar- cash flow was positive despite a fall in turno- Ahto, on the other hand, fostered Finnish- geted occupational safety development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2015-2016
    BALTIC ICEBREAKING MANAGEMENT Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2015-2016 1 Table of contents 1. Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Overview of the icebreaking season (2015-2016) and its effect on the maritime transport system in the Baltic Sea region ........................................................................................................................................ 5 4. Accidents and incidents in sea ice ......................................................................................................... 12 5. Winter Navigation Research .................................................................................................................. 12 6. Costs of Icebreaking services in the Baltic Sea ...................................................................................... 12 6.1 Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 12 6.2 Sweden ................................................................................................................................................ 12 6.3 Russia ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish CONNECTION the Saimaa Canal a Great Lakes Maritime Research Tour to the Baltic Sea Finds Many Shared Interests
    The Finnish CONNECTION The Saimaa Canal A Great Lakes maritime research tour to the Baltic Sea finds many shared interests The Great Lakes delegation to Finland included (from left) Stacey Carlson, Research Assistant, and Richard Stewart, Co-Director of the Great Lakes Maritime Research Institute; James Frost, Senior Consultant with Halifax-based CPCS Transcom; Adolf Ojard, Executive Director of the Duluth Seaway Port Authority; Craig Middlebrook, Deputy he Great Lakes and the Baltic Sea have Administrator of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation; and Dave Knight, Special Projects Manager a strong – and multi-dimensional - for the Great Lakes Commission. Tmaritime kinship.Both water bodies represent vital marine trade routes that helped define their respective regional economies and cultures. Both play strate - gic geopolitical roles on their respective con - tinents. The two share many physical similarities such as relative size, climate, hy - drography and topography. And both share a number of pressing environmental issues including ballast-borne invasive species, the threat of toxic spills, non-point source pol - lution and nutrient loading. Even the salinity difference is not as pro - nounced as many might think; while the Baltic is technically “brackish,” its salinity is much lower than ocean water and in some reaches with heavy tributary inflow Applied Sciences in Kotka, Finland, initially Centre of Finland and Kymenlaakson Uni - the water is almost as fresh as the Lakes. began sharing information in June of 2007 versity. Thus it was only natural that when two on project work Rytkönen has done in - Over a five-day period, the six-member maritime researchers met in 2007, one from volving vessel tracking and automated iden - Great Lakes delegation travelled from its the Baltic nation of Finland and the other tification system (AIS) technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Seatec International Maritime Review 2/2014
    International Maritime Review The French Connection Finnish companies are actively involved in building Oasis 3 Mein Schiff 3 First TUI cruiser delivered from STX’s Turku shipyard seatec.fi/magazine smm-hamburg.com 53° 33‘ 47“ N, 9° 58‘ hamburg 33“ E keeping the course 9 – 12 september 2014 HAMBURG the leading international maritime trade fair new in 2014: THE3-- THEMEDAYS SEPT fi nance day SEPT environmental protection day SEPT security and defence day SEPT offshore day SEPT recruiting day scan the QR code and view the trailer or visit smm-hamburg.com/trailer DNV GL In the maritime industry DNV GL is the world’s leading classification society and a recognized advisor for the maritime industry. We enhance safety, quality, energy efficiency and environmental performance of the global shipping industry – across all vessel types and offshore structures. We invest heavily in research and development to find solutions, together with the industry, that address strategic, operational or regulatory challenges. SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER editorial seatec 2/2014 COME TOGETHER PUBLISHER The Finnish marine cluster is certainly an interesting industry. Presently, PubliCo Oy it has been reported that the German shipyard Meyer Werft is looking Pälkäneentie 19 A FI-00510 Helsinki to buy the Turku shipyard from its South Korean owner, STX Europe. Finland According to the plans, also the State of the Finland would be involved Phone +358 9 686 6250 [email protected] in a small ownership role, helping to secure the deal. www.publico.com The Finnish marine cluster is finding other ways to cope in a brave new world, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2012-2013
    BALTIC ICEBREAKING MANAGEMENT Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2012-2013 1 Table of contents 1. Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Overview of the icebreaking season (2012-2013) and its effect on the maritime transport system in the Baltic Sea region ........................................................................................................................................ 5 4. Costs of Icebreaking services in the Baltic Sea ...................................................................................... 12 4.1 Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 12 4.2 Sweden ................................................................................................................................................ 12 4.4. Estonia ................................................................................................................................................ 13 4.5 Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Germany ............................................................................................... 13 4.6 Denmark .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public the Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Finnish Waters Deliverable No. D WP6 5 01 Date
    Title Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea Acronym EfficienSea Document Access: Public The Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Finnish Waters Part A: The Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Open Water Part B: The Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Winter Navigation Deliverable No. D_WP6_5_01 Date: 21.10.2011 Contract No. 013 efficiensea.org Part-financed by the European Union Public DOCUMENT STATUS Authors Name Organisation Kati Westerlund Finnish Transport Agency Reviewing/Approval of report Name Organisation Signature Date Tommi Arola FTA Tuomas Martikainen FTA Document History Revision Date Organisatio Initials Revised Short description of n pages changes 1 19.11.2010 FTA First draft of Part A 2 30.11.2010 FTA Part A: Corrections, diagrams, additional text 3 31.03.2011 FTA Appendix 4 Part A: Additional statistics and text 4 06.04.2011 FTA First draft of Part B 5 05.07.2011 FTA Front page Combined two reports 6 21.10.2011 FTA Combined common parts of Part A and Part B. Combined the text ‘Background’ from both reports to the one single. efficiensea.org Part-financed by the European Union Public Abbreviations/Definitions AIS Automatic Identification System COLREG Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea CPA Closest Point of Approach DW Deep Water (Route) DWT Dead Weight Tonnes GOFREP The Mandatory Ship Reporting System in the Gulf of Finland OOW Officer of the Watch SRS Ship Reporting System TSS Traffic Separation Scheme TSZ Traffic Separation Zone VTS Vessel Traffic Service VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (Teknologian tutkimuskeskus VTT; Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuslaitos until 1st December 2010) efficiensea.org Part-financed by the European Union Public TableofContents Abbreviations/Definitions .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Rauma Maritime Cluster Businesses 2019 New Edition
    Catalogue of the Rauma Maritime Cluster businesses 2019 New edition Rauman kaupunkikehitys / Rauma City Development Catalogue of the Rauma Maritime Cluster businesses Rauma Maritime Cluster Catalogue of the Rauma Maritime Cluster businesses 2019 New edition Catalogue design group: Heikki M. Nurmi Iiro Laine Jukka Mäkelä Publisher: Rauma City Development Layout: Jukka Mäkelä Printed at: Laine Direct Oy, Rauma 2019 Catalogue of the Rauma Maritime Cluster businesses 2019 New edition 3 Rauma Marine Constructions Rauma Marine Contents Rauma maritime cluster - Modern and versatile .............. 5 Maritime Industry ................................................................... 6 Maritime Transport ................................................................ 27 Port Operations ...................................................................... 32 Public Sector ........................................................................... 39 4 manufacturers. The park is a significant investment in the future for the city of Rauma. After five years running, the area houses around 30 companies col- laborating with each other. Their location in the indus- trial park gives them a competitive edge and promotes networking. Between the years 2014 and 2016 the Business Ser- vices of the City of Rauma ran the Rauma subproject of Turku Seas 2020 project which was part of the Meri programme by the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment. The aim of the project was to develop the operative environment of the companies belonging to the maritime cluster in Rauma, promote networking among these companies and support their marketing efforts. The first catalogue of maritime cluster companies in Rauma was compiled as part of the Turku Seas 2020 subproject. The current, updated version has been put together by Rauma City Development. The need for this catalogue was generated by the changes in the marine industry’s operational environment that call for effective marketing and constant presentation of expertise and client references by the companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctech – High-Rolling in the High Arctic
    Shipyard There are several projects for real ” icebreakers and other vessels with heavy ice classes, and Arctech is naturally interested in these. he shipyard is completing an arctic tanker Arctech – project for Greek owners. The vessel is a condensate carrier with a high ice class (Arc7), representing a new generation High-rolling in of Arctic tankers capable of operating Tin the extremely cold-weather conditions and shal- low waters of the river estuaries along the Siberian the High Arctic coast. Sea trials are expected to take place in April. Arctech has delivered various ice-class vessels to The Arctech Helsinki Shipyard has a long Russian owners. According to Markku Kajosaari, SVP Sales, demand for such vessels is, unfortunately, tradition of Arctic expertise in icebreakers limited today. The shipyard is looking for new-build and high-ice-class cargo ships. The shipyard projects in which Arctech could use all the special currently has its sights on potential new capabilities of the Helsinki shipyard. “We have had several enquiries about small to orders of Russian LNG-powered icebreakers. medium-size cruise vessels intended for operations in remote areas and harsh conditions. These types of projects could be very suitable for us. There are also 26 26-27_Maritime_EN_Archtech.indd 26 1.4.2019 12.31 the contract. However, even in this case, there will be very tough competition, as we have seen many times before. There are several advanced Russian shipbuild- ers nowadays,” says Kajosaari, playing down specu- lation of possible new icebreaker orders in Helsinki. At the same time, there is strong demand for high ice-class cargo ships in the High Arctic but, unfortu- nately, some of these new vessels are so enormous that the facilities in Helsinki are not large enough.
    [Show full text]
  • Polaris' Unique Concept Shines in Ice Trials
    Aker Arctic Technology Inc Newsletter September 2017 Polaris’ unique concept shines in ice trials The world's first LNG fuelled icebreaker,Polaris , was officially tested in full-scale ice trials towards the end of her first icebreaking season, in March, in the Bay of Bothnia. A team of four experts from Aker Arctic: Topi Leiviskä, Toni Skogström, Tuomas Romu and Juha Alas oini, joined the vessel for five days to supervise the trials. The purpose of the ice trials was to ensure that thePolaris fulfils all design requirements. “On the first day, after we left from the port of Oulu, we went looking for a demanding ridge field,” explains Head of Research and Testing Services Topi Leiviskä. “We found one ridge that we measured to be 10 metres thick and 95 metres wide, whichPolaris penetrated easily going forward.” The other ridge found, was measured Polaris is able to turn 180° on the spot in ice in one minute to be 13.6 metres thick and 50 metres and 15 seconds. Her turning ratio (= turning diameter per ship wide. length) is approximately 1, meaning she can make a circle her “Moving astern through the second own length. ridge, the captain wiggled the Azipods slightly, and jointly with Arctech Helsinki shipyard, the shipowner's representatives and the captain we broken all winter, but is filled with brash Moving forward the speed was 12 concluded that the ridge penetration ice, which was measured to be 174 cm knots in 81 cm thick ice, and capacity was excellent. This was one of thick.Polaris reached a speed of 14 through 72 cm thick ice it was 12.7 the original requirements of the vessel,” knots in the channel without any knots.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Has Been Downloaded from Tampub – the Institutional Repository of University of Tampere
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University This document has been downloaded from TamPub – The Institutional Repository of University of Tampere Post-print The permanent address of the publication is http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:uta-201405281513 Author(s): Kankaanpää, Jari; Oulasvirta, Lasse; Wacker, Jani Title: Steering and Monitoring Model of State-Owned Enterprises Year: 2014 Journal Title: International Journal of Public Administration Vol and number: 37 : 7 Pages: 409-423 ISSN: 0190-0692 Discipline: Business and management; Political science School /Other Unit: School of Management Item Type: Journal Article Language: en DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.858355 URN: URN:NBN:fi:uta-201405281513 All material supplied via TamPub is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all part of any of the repository collections is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise to anyone who is not an authorized user. Steering and Monitoring Model of State-Owned Enterprises Introduction Privatisation of stated-owned enterprises (SOEs) gained considerable momentum in developing and developed countries in the 1980s and 1990s (The World Bank, 2006, p. 3). Despite wide-ranging privatisation programmes, SOEs are still and will be an important part of many economies, especially in developing economies (La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, & Shleifer, 1999; Ezzamel, Wilmott, & Worthington, 2008; Vagliasindi, 2008; Ennser-Jedenastik, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • THE YEAR 2015 01 • the Year 2015 • New at Arctia in 2015
    THE YEAR 2015 01 • The year 2015 • New at Arctia in 2015 ..................................................................04 Arctia 2015 • The year 2015 in figures ............................................................. 05 • CEO’s Review ................................................................................06 02 • Arctia • Operating environment ...............................................................08 • Core messages and organisation ................................................12 • Corporate responsibility management ......................................17 • Financial responsibility ................................................................20 • Society and human rights ...........................................................23 EXPERT IN ARCTIC • Environment ................................................................................26 03 • Service areas CONDITIONS • Icebreaking services ......................................................................32 • Offshore services ..........................................................................34 Arctia’s icebreakers ensure the reliability and safety of • Oil spill prevention and response ................................................36 • Harbour icebreaking ....................................................................37 Finland’s shipping lanes in the winter. In 2015, we met • Arctia Events .................................................................................38 all service targets set for us in the Baltic Sea. Outside
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2017-2018
    BALTIC ICEBREAKING MANAGEMENT Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2017-2018 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Overview of the icebreaking season (2017-2018) and its effect on the maritime transport system in the Baltic Sea region ........................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Accidents and incidents in sea ice ........................................................................................................... 9 4. Winter Navigation Research .................................................................................................................... 9 5. Costs of Icebreaking services in the Baltic Sea ...................................................................................... 10 5.1 Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 10 5.2 Sweden ................................................................................................................................................ 10 5.3 Russia ................................................................................................................................................... 10 5.4. Estonia ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation-Based Assessment of the Operational Performance of the Finnish–Swedish Winter Navigation System
    applied sciences Article Simulation-Based Assessment of the Operational Performance of the Finnish–Swedish Winter Navigation System Martin Bergström * and Pentti Kujala Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland; pentti.kujala@aalto.fi * Correspondence: martin.bergstrom@aalto.fi; Tel.: +358-50-476-7229 Received: 15 August 2020; Accepted: 24 September 2020; Published: 27 September 2020 Abstract: This article presents a discrete event simulation-based approach for assessing the operating performance of the Finnish–Swedish Winter Navigation System (FSWNS) under different operating scenarios. Different operating scenarios are specified in terms of ice conditions, the volume of maritime traffic, number of icebreakers (IBs), and regulations such as the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI). Considered performance indicators include transport capacity, number of instances of icebreaker (IB) assistance, and IB waiting times. The approach is validated against real-world data on maritime traffic in the Bothnian Bay. In terms of the number of ship arrivals per port, indicating the transport capacity of the FSWNS, the simulation agrees well with the data. In terms of the number of instances of IB assistance and IB waiting times per port, the standard deviations between the mean of 35 independent simulation runs and the data are 13% and 18%, respectively. A sensitivity analysis indicates that the simulated number of instances of IB assistance and IB waiting times is particularly sensitive to assumptions concerning the presence of brash ice channels. Case studies indicate that, unless the number of IBs is increased, the EEDI regulations may result in a significant increase in both the number of instances of IB assistance and the cumulated IB waiting times.
    [Show full text]