Global Atlas of AIS-Based Fishing Activity Challenges and Opportunities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Atlas of AIS-Based Fishing Activity Challenges and Opportunities Global Atlas of AIS-based fishing activity Challenges and opportunities 1 Global Atlas of AIS-based fishing activity Challenges and opportunities M. Taconet, D. Kroodsma and J. A. Fernandes FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2019 Required citation: Taconet, M., Kroodsma, D., & Fernandes, J.A. 2019. Global Atlas of AIS-based fishing activity - Challenges and opportunities. Rome, FAO. (also available at www.fao.org/3/ca7012en/ca7012en.pdf). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. All maps conform to United Nations World map, February 2019. https://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/htmain.htm The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of AO.F ISBN 978-92-5-131964-2 © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the FAO logo is not permitted. If the work is adapted, then it must be licensed under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If a translation of this work is created, it must include the following disclaimer along with the required citation: “This translation was not created by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original [Language] edition shall be the authoritative edition. Disputes arising under the licence that cannot be settled amicably will be resolved by mediation and arbitration as described in Article 8 of the licence except as otherwise provided herein. The applicable mediation rules will be the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules and any arbitration will be conducted in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Third-party materials. Users wishing to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, are responsible for determining whether permission is needed for that reuse and for obtaining permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user. Sales, rights and licensing. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be pur- chased through [email protected]. Requests for commercial use should be submitted via: www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-re- quest. Queries regarding rights and licensing should be submitted to: [email protected]. Preparation of this document With advances in information technology, it is becoming possible to create a global database of fishing effort by gear type with an unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. Such a database has the potential to assist with fisheries management and research around the globe. When initiating this publication, FAO intended to present this potential by reviewing AIS-based data in the context of global and regional knowledge on fisheries, and to communicate the main findings as well as the strengths and limitations of these data and current processing methodology. The aim of this document, hereafter referred to as the Atlas, is to enable stakeholders to understand the opportunity and challenges of mapping and analysing fishing activity using AIS data. For each FAO Area, based on AIS data, this Atlas presents the number and percentage of vessels broadcasting AIS, the spatial patterns of presence and intensity of fishing activity, and an analysis by gear type. For these data, the Atlas includes detailed methods, case studies, and comparisons with other data. These comparisons, explanatory text, and caveats are presented with the goal of helping FAO Members understand how this new dataset can be applied. To ensure the accuracy of the conclusions, 80 fishery experts from around the world either authored, reviewed or assessed the maps, charts, and supporting text produced by the authors and editorial team. This Atlas has been prepared through a collaboration between Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Global Fishing Watch (GFW), and Fundación AZTI – AZTI Fundazioa. Seychelles Fishing Authority (SFA) has also contributed with a local study chapter. FAO is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN) that leads international efforts to defeat hunger. FAO’s goal is to achieve food security for all and ensure people have regular access to enough high-quality food to lead active, healthy lives. FAO has contributed to the Atlas with 1) the initial idea; 2) project partner coordination; 3) revision of fleet data statistics for FAO area chapters led by GFW; 4) coordination of external review; 5) leading introductory chapters and the conclusions chapter; and 6) overall study material editing and reviewing. GFW is an independent and non-profit organization originally set up through a collaboration between three partners: Oceana, an international ocean conservation organization; SkyTruth, experts in using satellite technology to protect the environment; and Google, which provides iii the tools for processing big data. GFW’s aim is to advance ocean sustainability and stewardship through increasing transparency. GFW has contributed to the Atlas with: 1) the initial idea, together with FAO; 2) providing the processed data, graphs and maps; 3) leading the writing of chapters on AIS data processing, methods and use; 4) leading revision of fleet statistics for FAO areas chapters together with FAO; 5) providing text and revision of FAO regions chapters; and 6) revision of the two detailed comparisons with VMS/logbook data (Bay of Biscay and Seychelles comparisons). AZTI is an independent and non-profit research and technology organization that aims to develop sustainable products and services for the long-term healthy development of society. Its marine research division works closely with fisheries and related industries towards increasing environmental and economic sustainability. AZTI has contributed to the Atlas with: 1) as an independent reviewer and editor of all Atlas materials; 2) data analysis and writing of the AIS and VMS/logbook data comparison chapter for the Bay of Biscay; and 3) leading the writing and review of FAO area chapters and the conclusions chapter. SFA is the competent fisheries and marine resources management authority for the Seychelles. The SFA monitors its national coastal and high seas fishing fleets and the foreign fleets licensed to operate within Seychelles waters. The SFA has contributed to the Atlas with: 1) the detailed case study comparing AIS data to VMS and logbook data in the Seychelles tuna fisheries and 2) the revision of the Bay of Biscay case study. iv Contents Preparation of this document iii Acknowledgements vi Acronyms vii Executive summary ix Introduction of Global Atlas of AIS-based fishing activity 1 AIS-based methods for estimating fishing vessel activity and operations 13 Use of AIS by the world’s fishing fleet 33 Bay of Biscay VMS/logbook comparison (FAO Subarea 27.8) 43 Seychelles VMS/logbook comparison for tuna fisheries (FAO Area 51) 79 FAO Area 18 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Arctic Sea 109 FAO Area 21 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Northwest Atlantic 121 FAO Area 27 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Northeast Atlantic 137 FAO Area 31 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Western Central Atlantic 155 FAO Area 34 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Eastern Central Atlantic 169 FAO Area 37 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Mediterranean and Black Sea 185 FAO Area 41 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Southwest Atlantic 199 FAO Area 47 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Southeast Atlantic 215 FAO Areas 48, 58 and 88– AIS-based fishing activity in the Southern Ocean 229 FAO Area 51 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Western Indian Ocean 245 FAO Area 57 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Eastern Indian Ocean 263 FAO Area 61 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Northwest Pacific 277 FAO Area 67 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Northeast Pacific 293 FAO Area 71 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Western Central Pacific 307 FAO Area 77 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Eastern Central Pacific 321 FAO Area 81 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Southwest Pacific 335 FAO Area 87 – AIS-based fishing activity in the Southeast Pacific 347 Conclusions and overview of Global Atlas of AIS-based fishing activity 363 v Acknowledgements The editors would like to thank Manuel Barange, Director of FAO’s Fisheries and Aquaculture Policy and Resources Division, for the original ideation given to this work, and his general support. Jennifer Gee and Kiran Viparthi contributed respectively to FAO fleet statistics and charts/maps design, and provided valuable inputs to initial ideation, document scoping and coordination within the editorial team.
Recommended publications
  • Recreational Fishing
    12 Recreational Fishing 12.1 Introduction There are numerous recreational activities that utilise the waters around Guernsey, but due to it being and island nation recreational fishing is an especially large use of the resource. As such it has been decided to dedicate a chapter to recreational fishing to run alongside the commercial fisheries chapter. Most, if not all, of the waters in the Study area are at some time fished recreationally, however some specific points are fished to greater extent than others. The effects on both the target species, and the recreational fishers are discussed in this chapter. 12.2 Baseline Environment 12.2.1 Identification of Recreational Fishers This is a large but disparate group of individuals consisting of leisure and sport anglers, hand-liners, snorkel and scuba divers, amateur potters, trotters, netters and long-liners, operating both from the shore and afloat, and shore-gatherers. In many cases the same individuals will fall into more than one or even many of these groups, and as a result it is very difficult to quantify the numbers of people actively involved in these traditional activities. Nevertheless it is fair to say that, taken as a group, these individuals represent a significant area of economic activity, directly and indirectly supporting many aspects of the Island’s retail and service industries, and contributing to public funds. For example, there are an estimated 5000 plus small craft based in Guernsey alone, ranging from kayaks to cruisers, RIBs to racing yachts, dinghies today cruisers. Many of these will at some time or other engage in recreational fishing activities, even if only towing a set of mackerel feathers whilst in transit to the next port.
    [Show full text]
  • Bidding Wars: Enactments of Expertise and Emotional Labor in the Spanish Competition for the European Capital of Culture 2016 Title
    BIDDING WARS: ENACTMENTS OF EXPERTISE AND EMOTIONAL LABOR IN THE SPANISH COMPETITION FOR THE EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE 2016 TITLE By Alexandra Oancă Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisors: Professor Jean-Louis Fabiani Professor Daniel Monterescu CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 I hereby state that this dissertation contains no material accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. The thesis contains no materials previously written and/or published by another person, except where appropriate acknowledgment is made in the form of bibliographical reference. Budapest, May 2017 Alexandra Oancă CEU eTD Collection In the loving memory of Marcel Oancă (1961-2016) CEU eTD Collection Abstract Competition appears to be pervasive. Nowadays, it is portrayed as the necessary philosophy of socio-economic life, seemingly driving both companies and cities, to engage in an all-out competitive struggle for resources. However, competition between cities is neither ‘natural’ nor a ‘macro-structural effect’ of contemporary urbanism and state restructuring but a dynamic and relational ensemble of socio-spatial policy processes that connect and disconnect cities, scales and wider policy networks. For European cities, the engineering of inter-urban competition is a state-led political and economic project: it is not a coherent project of the EU but a partial assemblage of different policy processes that have uneven consequences and that are contestable and contested. Instead of looking at inter-urban competition and competitive bidding solely as phenomena that are reflecting and reinforcing class interests, state projects or hegemonic ideologies, it is more productive to include them into a relational and processual analysis and focus on how these processes of inter-city rivalries are actually unfolding and on the specific labor practices that make them possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Law Reform: Moving Beyond Strict Criminal Penalties for Drugs
    Drug law reform: Moving beyond strict criminal penalties for drugs Professor Simon Lenton Deputy Director, NDRI Introduction The term ‘decriminalisation’ can confuse the discussion about drug policy reform as it means so many different things to different people. Indeed many confuse ‘decriminalisation’ with ‘legalisation’, that is, making some aspect of the drug possession/use no longer an offence. More correctly, the term is used to refer to refer to what is termed prohibition with civil penalties, that is, much like speeding in a motor vehicle – illegal, not condoned, but only attracting civil penalties like a fine, with no further criminal actions taken if the fine is paid by the due date. It is likely that others use it as a generic term meaning reducing penalties in comparison to total prohibition with strict criminal penalties. The confusion about what decriminalisation means is problematic for a number of reasons. Firstly, sensible discussion of drug policy options is impossible when the meanings of terms aren’t shared. Secondly, we tend to be scared of what we don’t understand. Consequently, it is unsurprising that the latest Nielsen poll has found that public support for ‘decriminalisation’ is low, at only 27% (1). Previously it has been found that when the term was explained, support for applying prohibition with civil penalties to cannabis use increased from 64% to 72% (2). According to the National Drug Strategy Survey Australian public support for criminal penalties for possession of cannabis has remained low, ranging from 34% to 39%, in the four surveys conducted between 2001 and 2010. Interestingly, support for legalisation of cannabis use has been even lower declining from 31% in 2001 to 25% in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • F. Javier Nieto, MD, Ph.D., MPH, MHS (March 2020)
    Curriculum Vitae Updated March 2020 F. JAVIER NIETO, M.D., M.P.H., M.H.S., Ph.D. Dean and Professor College of Public Health and Human Sciences Oregon State University 123 Women’s Building. Corvallis, OR 97331 +1-541-737-3256; +1-541-737-4230 (fax) [email protected] GRADUATE EDUCATION AND TRAINING 1991 Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University 1988 Master of Health Science (M.H.S.), Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University 1985 Master of Public Health (M.P.H.), Institute for Health Development of Havana, Cuba 1984 Diploma in Biostatistics, University of Barcelona, Spain 1979-83 Residence in Family and Community Medicine, General Hospital of Segovia, Spain 1978 Medical Doctor (MD), School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Spain ACADEMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS 2016-Present Dean and Professor, College of Public Health and Human Sciences (CPHHS), Oregon State University (OSU). 2017-Present Professor Emeritus, Department of Population Health Sciences (PHS), University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health (UWSMPH). 2002-2016 Department Chair and Professor, PHS, UWSMPH. 2002-2016 Affiliate Professor, Department of Family Medicine, UWSMPH. 2013-2016 Affiliate Professor, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin- Madison. 2013-2016 Adjunct Professor, Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. 2005-2009 Adjunct Professor, Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health (JHUSPH) (Formerly, Adjunct Associate Professor.) 2000-2001 Director, General Epidemiology Program, Department of Epidemiology, JHUSPH. 1998-2001 Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology, Department of International Health, and Center for Human Nutrition, JHUSPH. 1994-1998 Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology, JHUSPH.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Country Review
    Spain 2016 Country Review http://www.countrywatch.com Table of Contents Chapter 1 1 Country Overview 1 Country Overview 2 Key Data 4 Spain 5 Europe 6 Chapter 2 8 Political Overview 8 History 9 Political Conditions 12 Political Risk Index 63 Political Stability 77 Freedom Rankings 92 Human Rights 104 Government Functions 107 Government Structure 110 Principal Government Officials 121 Leader Biography 128 Leader Biography 128 Foreign Relations 130 National Security 144 Defense Forces 146 Appendix: The Basques 147 Appendix: Spanish Territories and Jurisdiction 161 Chapter 3 163 Economic Overview 163 Economic Overview 164 Nominal GDP and Components 190 Population and GDP Per Capita 192 Real GDP and Inflation 193 Government Spending and Taxation 194 Money Supply, Interest Rates and Unemployment 195 Foreign Trade and the Exchange Rate 196 Data in US Dollars 197 Energy Consumption and Production Standard Units 198 Energy Consumption and Production QUADS 200 World Energy Price Summary 201 CO2 Emissions 202 Agriculture Consumption and Production 203 World Agriculture Pricing Summary 206 Metals Consumption and Production 207 World Metals Pricing Summary 210 Economic Performance Index 211 Chapter 4 223 Investment Overview 223 Foreign Investment Climate 224 Foreign Investment Index 226 Corruption Perceptions Index 239 Competitiveness Ranking 251 Taxation 259 Stock Market 261 Partner Links 261 Chapter 5 263 Social Overview 263 People 264 Human Development Index 267 Life Satisfaction Index 270 Happy Planet Index 281 Status of Women 291 Global Gender
    [Show full text]
  • Social-Ecological Impacts of Agrarian Intensification: the Case of Modern Irrigation in Navarre
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Ph.D. dissertation Social-ecological impacts of agrarian intensification: The case of modern irrigation in Navarre Amaia Albizua Supervisors: Dr. Unai Pascual Ikerbasque Research Professor. Basque Center for Climate Change (BC3), Building Sede 1, 1st floor Science Park UPV/EHU, Sarriena | 48940 Leioa, Spain Dr. Esteve Corbera Senior Researcher. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Building Z Campus UAB | 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola). Barcelona, Spain A dissertation submitted for the degree of Ph.D. in Environmental Science and Technology 2016 Amaia Albizua 2016 Cover: Painting by Txaro Otxaran, Navarre case study region Nire familiari, ama, aita ta Josebari Ta batez ere, amama Felisaren memorian Preface This dissertation is the product of nearly five years of intense personal and professional development. The exploration began when a series of coincidences led me to the Basque Centre for Climate Change Centre (BC3). I had considered doing a PhD since the beginning of my professional career, but the long duration of a PhD and focusing on a particular topic discouraged such intentions.
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs, Crime and Statistics a Hangover for Life Prison Needle Exchange Controversy Quit Or Die, You Have Another Choice Contents
    Drugs, crime and statistics A hangover for life Prison needle exchange controversy Quit or die, you have another choice Contents matters of substance November 2007 Features Vol 17 No 4 ISSN 1177-200X 02 Cover Story Is alcohol-related brain Mike Webb of the matters of substance is published by the Let’s talk about pot impairment a silent New Zealand Police writes NZ Drug Foundation. All rights reserved. but growing epidemic about a major review of Neither this publication nor any part amongst heavy drinking the Police Act, which is of it may be reproduced without prior permission of the NZ Drug Foundation. New Zealanders? New currently underway, and the research suggests our opportunities this might bring matters of substance invites feedback culture of drunkenness about for harm minimisation and contributions. If you’re interested in may be putting our brains at the frontline of policing. contributing a guest editorial or article, at risk, and most won’t please first contact us: know until it’s too late. [email protected] Marijuana. It’s the most 29 Mythbusters p +64 4 801 6303 widely used and least talked Hard time and about (illicit) recreational Regulars hard numbers Brand development/graphic design drug in New Zealand. In this Origin Design +64 4 801 6644 [email protected] special edition of Matters of 01 The Director’s Cut Substance, we’ve asked Drug Foundation Director interested and interesting NZ Drug Foundation Ross Bell writes about 3rd Floor, 111 Dixon Street people from across the current drug law review in PO Box 3082, Wellington, New Zealand cannabis spectrum to share New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Sea Fisheries Statistics 2019
    1 Contents Key Statistics ...................................................................................................................... 4 About this publication ........................................................................................................ 5 Section 1: Fleet ................................................................................................................... 6 Fleet characteristics ........................................................................................................ 7 Vessel length ................................................................................................................ 9 Age of vessels ............................................................................................................ 12 Industry group............................................................................................................ 13 Fishers on UK vessels .................................................................................................. 13 Fishers by UK nation ................................................................................................. 14 Section 2: Landings .......................................................................................................... 16 UK summary ............................................................................................................... 16 Vessel nationality ....................................................................................................... 17 Vessel length
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fisheries & Mariculture
    11 Commercial Fisheries & Mariculture 263 11.1 Introduction 263 11.2 Baseline Environment 265 11.3 Potential Key Effects 285 11.4 Sensitivity of receptors 290 11.5. Potential Significance of Effects 292 11.6. Likelihood of Occurrence 295 11.7 Mitigation Measures 296 11.8 Confidence and Knowledge Gaps 298 11.9 Residual Effects 299 11.10 Recommendations for Survey and Monitoring 301 References 302 262 11 Commercial Fisheries & Mariculture 11.1 Introduction Commercial fishing is an important industry in the REA study area, generating approx 3.5 million pounds worth of first sale landings in 2008 (table 11.2.1). Key species of commercial importance in the REA study area include Lobster, Edible Crab, Spider Crab, Scallop, European seabass, Pollack, Ray, Brill , Turbot, Sole, Red mullet ,Black bream. and Sandeels. Section 11.2 describes the current situation with regards to Commercial fishing activities taking into account available information on the landings and value of key commercial species, structure of the commercial fleet, intensity of fishing across the study area, the location of key fishing grounds and main fishing seasons. Fig 11.1.1: Under ten metre commercial fishing boats at the Boue Blondel 2006. These size boats typify the Bailiwick fleet. 263 Mariculture in the form of designated fishery areas are also situated in sub-tidal Areas, focused exclusively on the production of Pacific Oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and Mussels (Mytilus edulis). These operations are discussed in more detail in sub section 11.2.11. Fig 11.1.2: Oysters being layed onto trestle tables, Rocquaine Bay 2008. This type of operation is practiced at various locations around the shoreline of Guernsey.
    [Show full text]
  • “BELGIUM” New Development, Trends and In-Depth Information on Selected Issues
    BELGIAN MONITORING CENTRE FOR DRUGS AND DRUG ADDICTION Scientific Institute of Public Health OD Public health and Surveillance 2012 NATIONAL REPORT (2011 DATA ) TO THE EMCDDA BY THE REITOX NATIONAL FOCAL POINT “BELGIUM” New Development, Trends and in-depth information on selected issues REITOX Belgian national report on drugs 2012 OD Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health, October 2011, Brussels, Belgium WIV-ISP/EPI REPORTS Belgian national report on drugs 2012 Els Plettinckx Jerome Antoine Kaatje Bollaerts Peter Blanckaert Johan C.H. van Bussel EMCDDA Management Board Mr. Claude GILLARD , Legal adviser, Head of the Department of criminal law, Direction Générale de la législation du Service Public Fédéral Justice Dr. Philippe DEMOULIN , Deputy Director General f.f., Administration de la Communauté française de Belgique EMCDDA Scientific Committee Prof. Dr. Brice DE RUYVER , Full Professor, Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy (IRCP), University of Ghent Ministers involved in the global and integrated drug policy in Belgium 2012 For the Federal State: Mr. Elio DI RUPO , Prime Minister. Mrs. Laurette ONKELINX , Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Public Health and Social Affairs, in charge of Beleris and the Federal Cultural Institutions. Mme. Joelle MILQUET, Vice-Prime Minister and Minister of the interior and Equal Opportunities. Mr. Didier REYNDERS, Vice-Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and European Affairs. Mr. Steven VANACKERE , Vice-Prime Minister, and Minister of Finance and sustainable development, in charge of official affairs. Mr. Vincent VAN QUICKENBORNE , Vice-Prime Minister and Minister of Pensions. Mr. Johan VANDE LANOTTE , Vice-Prime Minister and Minister of Economy, Consumers and North Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing & Shipwrecked Heritage Sean A
    Fall 08 August 2012 Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Fishing & Shipwrecked Heritage Sean A. Kingsley Wreck Watch Int., London, UK www.wreckwatch.com ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Fishing & Shipwrecked Heritage SEAN A. KINGSLEY Wreck Watch Int., London, UK Amongst the detrimental man-made impacts to which shipwrecks are susceptible – such as sand and gravel dredging, pipeline cutting and looting – the pressures of the global fishing industry are understated. Recent research has led to a growing concern that trawling and scallop dredging are high on the list of the most aggressive forms of anthropogenic impact on the resource. The classes of artefacts inadvertently snagged in nets reveal a geographically and typologically wide set of data. The damaging reality may be compared to the effects of ploughing on terrestrial archaeological sites. Underwater, however, no policies have been formulated to manage and mitigate offshore fishing politically or to recommend best-practice guidance. This report presents global evidence for the history of bottom fishing impacts on underwater cultural heritage and examines the diversity of impacted finds and sites through 68 examples and case studies. Potential forms of mitigation and management are discussed. KEYWORDS shipwrecks, underwater cultural heritage, fishing, trawlers, sustainability. 1. Introduction In theory, the inadvertent recovery of artefacts and ships’ timbers in fishing nets should be an obvious high-visibility means of wreck sourcing. Although underwater cultural heritage has been brought to the attention of antiquarians and archaeologists through these channels since the 18th century in some countries, and with rapid escalation since the 1950s linked to the development of fishing fleets with more powerful engines (causing world catches to double from 30 to 60 million tonnes between 1959 and 1970: Hall, 1999: 3), this highly intrusive form of impact is poorly understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Jersey & Guernsey
    Fleury – Channel Islands’ Fisheries JERSEY AND GUERNSEY: TWO DISTINCT APPROACHES TO CROSS-BORDER FISHERY MANAGEMENT CHRISTIAN FLEURY Université de Caen Basse-Normandie <[email protected]> Abstract 2 The Channel Island bailiwicks1 of Jersey and Guernsey have a land area of 196 km and, together with their surrounding waters, cover a total surface area of approximately 5000 km2 within the Normand-Breton gulf. The bailiwick of Jersey comprises its main island and the uninhabited, rocky shelves of the Minquiers and the Ecrehous. The bailiwick of Guernsey comprises the inhabited islands of Alderney, Sark, Herm and Brecqhou in addition to its main island and a number of uninhabited offshore islets. Emphasising the autonomy of the two bailiwicks, each has a significantly different relationship with France over the issue of coastal fisheries; with Guernsey having had no dialogue with France over access issues and related disputes since the mid-1990s whereas Jersey has developed a relationship based on trust, as manifest in the Joint Advisory Committee of the Bay of Granville, which is part of the proceedings set up within the framework of an international treaty signed between France and the United Kingdom in July 2000. The following text will describe the stakes, strategies and convergent and divergent views between these parties over the issue of access to regional fisheries Keywords Jersey, Guernsey, France, fishing agreements, insularity, marine borders, sea appropriation conflicts Introduction: Why is the border there? The paradox of the presence of foreign islands within a pronounced indentation of the French coastline (Figure 1) has its roots in the antagonism that defined the relationship between the French and English kingdoms concerning the sovereignty of Normandy at the beginning of the 13th Century.
    [Show full text]