DOCSLIB.ORG

Manganese Deposits of Western Arizona I.C. 7843

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manganese Deposits of Western Arizona I.C. 7843 I I I MANGANESE DEPOSITS OF WESTERN ARIZONA I BY L. L. FARNHAM AND L. A. STEWART I * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Information Circular 7843 I I UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. WASHINGTON : 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES , Morling I. Ankeny. Director For rale by the Superintendent of Documents. U. S. Government Printing OfUce Washington 25. D. C. - - - - Price 45 cents CONTENTS Page Summary and introduction ................... Description of deposits-Continued Acknonledgments......................... I\Ioha\.e County-Continued Physical features and climate ................. Artillerv Mountains repion-Continued Psilomelane group.. -~.................. Psilomelane h'o. 1.................. Psilomelane No. 4 .................. - . Black Jack ........................... History and production ................ Plnncha Mountain group. ............. Denison grorip ....................... Black Crow group (Xeilson) ........... Shoup group ......................... Black Warrior No. I1 (Murlev).. ......... Blue Ridge claims.. .................... Lnr;t Chance ......................... Lost Apache claim ...................... Blnck hIary .......................... Heber district. ......................... Polisbnitegroup ....................... Johnson and Hnyden deposit ............. Black Mollie ......................... hlaricopa County ......................... American. ............................ Aguila district .......... ...:. ....:.-- .... Ind~an.. ............................. History and production ................ Oversight.-. ......................... Snmho Aguiln group .................. Other de osits .................... Black Crow (Atkins or Alendow) ....... MW Rnn~iiea;~.................... oup ........................ Cnstemdn.. ......................... PumicefVnlley lew and Ynrnell groups ........ Black Burro.......................... Purple Pansy (Fugatt). ............... Pilot Rock area ....................... Kat Head............................ Yucca (Ssnta Fe) ..................... Black Rock group .................... Wickieup Queen (Emery group). ....... Black Bart ........................... Carrow prospect ...................... Knahe No. 4 .......................... Black Diamond ....................... Roadside ............................ ItV.- ......................... Black Nugget (U. S. group) ............ Iatton) ................... Black Queen (Armour group) ........... posits .................... Black Sue............................ Blue .rank district ...................... Blnck Raven nnd Cmw groups (Pitte- Black Rock group.................... Apacheburgh and grou g ) ....................... Blind Child .......................... ulcy claims (Gallagher and Black Dome ........................... Flynn groups) ...................... Black Buck ............................ American ............................ Cummings claims ....................... Knahe No.8 ......................... Fiscus and Mitchell claims............... Lions Den ........................... Burmister mine (Black Magic) ........... Webb claims ......................... Black Duke (Bob Allen claims) ........... hlohave County.......................... La McCoy group ....................... History ................................ Yuma County ............................ Production ............................. Northern Yumn County ................. Geology ............................... War Eagle (Iron King group). ......... Manganese occurrences .................. Black Crow group .................... Reserves ............................... Lucky group ......................... Artillery Mountains renion ............... Doyle mine (Last Resort) .............. hlohnve blining & hIiiling Co .......... Black Band (Manganese King group) -.. Priceless and Price groups ............. Black Bear .......................... Priceless pit ........................ S ring mine (Kaiserdoom group) ....... Mining methods .................... dangnnite.---- --..--- -.-- --. - - - - - - - - Pricc workings-. ................... Magnesite. .......................... World Mnn~anese Corp. (successor to 'Bouse (Plomoaa) district ................. F. A. Sitton) ..................... Blnck Bird ........................... Black Hills group..................... NeedleEye- ....................... Laurella claims ....................... Alamo Queen (Manganosite) ......... Linda I< ............................. Black Diamond group ............... Black Chief .......................... Black Eaele--. moun .................. Black Crust .......................... Shannon---------------.--------.-. Black Stud- ......................... Lane Star.......................... Black Beauty claims .................. Blossom group.. ................... Other clairrm ....................... Concentrating plants POUP-------------.------------- - ~ ................ Bird Hudy ............................... Cindy. - - --- --- --- -- ---------- - - -- --- Maggie mine ......................... Bhck Hawk ......................... Lake deposit----.-..---.------------- Black Beauty (Perry) ................. m CONTENTS Description of depusits-Continued Description of deposits-Continued Y uma County-Continued Yuma County-Continued Ccntral Yunm Countr.. .. .... .......... Central Yuma County-Continued Triuo district -.---............-.-..-.- Trigo district~continued History and production ...-.....---. 1.n Angora ......................... Cibala ~roup-..--. -- ...........--. Nntional Deht ................ ..... Hess, Hcss, and Lilly claims .....-.-.. Hidden Trensure (.\lngic group.. .... Penuv--- B claim .----.... .... .....---- Dreiser............................ Triple H ........................... Black Hawk (Livingston) ..-.....--.- Black Diamond group-............-- Black Dahlia .............--..--.-.- Andrus claims ..--...............--- hlontaya claims (Black Jack). .....-. Black Top .---............--.----.- ABC claims (Self mine) .--........... Black King ---.-..-.......--.----.- Fools Folly -.-...-.--.--.----...... Sheep Tanks --............---.--..- Metate ............................ Hovatter claims.. .. .. .... .-.......- ILLUSTRATIONS Pi. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~- 5. Locatton". ma~.'~euilndistrict kannanese denosits.. ............................................. 7. Manganese deposits of Mnhave County ........................................................ 8. Panoramic view of Artillery Mountains ......................................................... 9. I.urntion tnnp, mnjor nrt of Arlillery .\loul~tnins~~pion.. .. .. ... .. ... .. ... ... .. .. .. .... .. 10. Concrntr;,ting pinnr, ffolm\.e Alininn ct hlilling Co ... ..... .. ....................... .... .. .. ... 11. .\fill flotvshcct. hlulmvc hlininc & hli.litw Co ............. .. ...... ...... ................ ~.~ 13. View of Priceless pit ...-.........-........................................................... 14. Plan and section, McCregor it .......................................................... 15. Plog and section, major iliac! DC&~workings. ................ ....-......................... 16. Flowsheet of log-washing plant, World Manganese Corp .......................................... li. Concentrating plant, World Manganese Corp. ..............................................~.... 18. Mill flowsheet, World Manganese Corp......................................................... 19. Plan andsection.. Mnagie mine ................................................................ 20. Plan and section, Lake pit .................................................................... 21. 5lnngntlcse deprnits of Ynvnp:ti Counr?.. .. .. .. .......... .... .. .... .. .. .... .. ........ ..... 22. Geologic and topogrnphic mnp, llt~rn~istermine.. .... .. .. ................... ..... ...... ......... 23. hlanennese denozits of Yuma Countr.. .. .. .. .. ... .. ... ....... ........ .. ... .. ... ~ .~ 24. ~ketrhmnp, and section, Doyle' pit ........................................................ 25. Location map, manganese deposits in Central Trigo hlountains. ...-.--..-----.-.-.-..-.--.-.---- TABLE I. Arizona manganese production.. ........ ,. .. .. MANGANESE DEPOSITS OF WESTERN Summnv and Introduction HIS PAPER is one of a series concerning the mineral resources of the Nation. It briefly describes most of the various known manganese de- Tposits of western Arizona, which for the purpose of this report is con- sidered to include the counties of Coconino, Maricopa, Xlohave, Yavapai, and Yuma. With very few exceptions, these descriptions are the result of field examinations by the writen. The location of the deposits is described by section, township, and range in surve ed nreas and by approximate projections of these subdivisions in un- surveyeiareas. The townsl~ipand range numbers refer to the Gila and Salt River base and meridian. This investigation was begun in March 1954, and during the following 2 ears a total of 115 deposits had been examined. The distribution of deposits counties is as follows: 7 in Coconino, 23 in Mnricopa, 32 in Mohave, 11 in avapal, and 42 in Yuma. The history, production, ownership, geologic setting, and mining methods are discussed for most of the deposits visited. Some deposits may have been overlooked, but all the principal ones have been .exnmlned. Some of the smaller deposits probably have been worked out smce they were visited, as most of them were producing when examined. The Bureau of Mines plans to descr~bethe manganese
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geology of Cienega Mining District, Northwestern Yuma County, Arizona
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations 1965 Geology of Cienega Mining District, Northwestern Yuma County, Arizona Elias Zambrano Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Department: Recommended Citation Zambrano, Elias, "Geology of Cienega Mining District, Northwestern Yuma County, Arizona" (1965). Masters Theses. 7104. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7104 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGY OF CIENEGA MINING DISTRICT, NORTHWESTERN YUM.1\, COUNTY, ARIZONA BY ELIAS ZAMBRANO I J'i~& A THESIS submitted to the faculty of the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT ROLLA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN GEOLOGY Rolla, Missouri 1965 ~!'Approved by ~2/~advisor) ~ ~·-~~ ii ABSTRACT In the mapped area three metamorphic units crop out: calc-silicates and marble, gneiss, and a conglomerate- schist section. The first one consists of a series of intercalations of calc-silicate rocks, local marbles, and greenschist. Quartzite appears in the upper part of the section. This section passes transitionally to the gneiss, which is believed to be of sedimentary origin. Features indicative of sedimentary origin include inter­ calation with marble, relic bedding which can be observed locally, intercalation of greenschist clearly of sedimentary origin, lack of homogeneity in composition with both lateral and vertical variation occurring, roundness of zircon grains, and lack of zoning in the feldspars.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Zoning
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Summary............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Definitions Used in This Plan ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 How to Use the Plan .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Circulation .................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Applicability .................................................................................................................. 3 1.7 Previous Comprehensive Plans ................................................................................... 3 1.8 Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan ................................................................... 3 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Role and Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan ............................................................ 5 2.2 Land Use Element........................................................................................................ 5 2.3
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Stand-Replacing Fire in Upper Montane Forests of the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau, Southwestern USA
    Fire Ecology Volume 7, Issue 3, 2011 Margolis et al.: Historical Stand-Replacing Fire doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0703088 Page 88 RESEARCH ARTICLE HISTORICAL STAND-REPLACING FIRE IN UPPER MONTANE FORESTS OF THE MADREAN SKY ISLANDS AND MOGOLLON PLATEAU, SOUTHWESTERN USA Ellis Q. Margolis1*, Thomas W. Swetnam1, and Craig D. Allen2 1University of Arizona Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, 105 W. Stadium, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 2US Geological Survey Jemez Mountains Field Station, HCR 1, Box 1, Number 15, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA *Corresponding author: Tel.: 001-520-626-2733; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The recent occurrence of large fires with a substantial stand-replacing component in the southwestern United States (e.g., Cerro Grande, 2000; Rodeo-Chedeski, 2002; Aspen, 2003; Horseshoe 2, Las Conchas, and Wallow, 2011) has raised questions about the his- torical role of stand-replacing fire in the region. We reconstructed fire dates and stand-re- placing fire patch sizes using four lines of tree-ring evidence at four upper montane forest sites (>2600 m) in the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau of Arizona and New Mexico, USA. The four lines of tree-ring evidence include: (1) quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and spruce-fir age structure, (2) conifer death dates, (3) traumatic resin ducts and ring-width changes, and (4) conifer fire scars. Pre-1905 fire regimes in the upper montane forest sites were variable, with drier, south-facing portions of some sites record- ing frequent, low-severity fire (mean fire interval of all fires ranging from 5 yr to 11 yr among sites), others burning with stand-replacing severity, and others with no evidence of fire for >300 yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Drought Preparedness Plan
    Arizona Drought Preparedness Plan OOPPEERRAATTIIOONNAALL DDRROOUUGGHHTT PPLLAANN Governor’s Drought Task Force Governor Janet Napolitano October 8, 2004 GOVERNOR’S DROUGHT TASK FORCE ARIZONA DROUGHT PREPAREDNESS PLAN Operational Drought Plan - 10-08-2004 GOVERNOR’S DROUGHT TASK FORCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Governor’s Drought Task Force would like to thank Herb Guenther, Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources and his staff for their support and assistance in the development of this Plan. Additionally, the Task Force would like to recognize the following individuals and organizations for their assistance and contributions: Mike Austin, Arizona Department of Water Resources Staff to the Task Force Sandy Whitney, Arizona Water Banking Authority (Coordinator) Carol Young, Arizona Department of Water Resources (Administrative Assistant) Workgroup/Committee Co-Chairs Commerce, Recreation & Tourism Jim Holt, Arizona Department of Water Resources Conservation Committee Marjie Risk, Arizona Department of Water Resources (Coordinator) Environmental Health, Watershed Management, Livestock & Wildlife Steve Barker, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Co-Chair) George Ruyle, University of Arizona (Co-Chair) Sandy Whitney (Co-Chair) Irrigated Agriculture Mike Hanrahan, Arizona Department of Water Resources (Co-Chair) Sheldon Jones, Agri-Business Council (Co-Chair) Monitoring Committee Gregg Garfin, University of Arizona – CLIMAS (Co-Chair) Tony Haffer, National Weather Service – Phoenix (Co-Chair) Municipal & Industrial Workgroup Tom
    [Show full text]
  • The Avifauna of Apache County, Arizona
    THE AVIFAUNA OF APACHE COUNTY, ARIZONA GARY H. ROSENBERG. Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University. Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 SCOTT B. TERRILL, Departmentof BiologicalSciences, State Universityof New York at Albany, 1400 WashingtonAve., Albany, New York 12222 In general, the distributionand the seasonalstatus of the avifauna of Arizonaare fairly well understood.The Birdsof Arizona (Phillipset al. 1964) encompassesthe entirestate and is fairlycomplete for all seasons.Large sec- tions of the state, however, have received relatively little ornithological coverage. The entire region of Apache County in northeasternArizona is one such area. Even though this area is quite interestingornithologically, before 1976 it receivedlittle coveragerelative to the many popularbirding "hot spots"in other sectionsof the state. It is possibleto assemblea list of those speciesthat breed in Apache County usingPhillips et al. (1964), its revisionby Monson and Phillips(1981), and severaldetailed studies (e.g. Carotherset al. 1973, Franzreb1975). Yet there remain substantialgaps in our knowledgeof migrant, wintering,and some nestingspecies found in Apache County. Since the mid-1970s, primarilyas a resultof the "vagranthunting" boom that swept parts of the West, Apache County has been visitedrepeatedly during all seasons.A significantincrease in knowledge of the statusand distributionof birds in northeasternArizona has resulted. This paper em- phasizesthe diversityand ornithologicaluniqueness of Apache County and summarizes the status of the birds found there. Apache County coversan area of approximately15,000 km2 in the north- eastern corner of Arizona. It extends from the White Mountains in the south to the Utah border in the north. The entire eastern border is shared with New Mexico and the county extendsabout 85 km to its westernborder shared with Navajo County.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohave County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Mohave County Multi‐Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Background and Scope ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Assurances ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Plan Organization ........................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2: COMMUNITY PROFILES ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Mohave County ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Bullhead City ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Colorado City ................................................................................................................................ 19 2.4 Kingman ........................................................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Adult Female Black Bear Daybeds
    CHARACTERISTICSOF ADULTFEMALE BLACK BEAR DAYBEDSIN NORTHERNARIZONA CHERYLM. MOLLOHAN,Arizona Game and Fish Department, 2222 Greenway Road, Phoenix, AZ 85023 Abstract: Ninety-four black bear (Ursus americanus) bedding sites were located between May 1982 and August 1984. Locations were identified by radio- tracking 14 adult females. Sampling from sites of females with and without cubs showed both bedding and feeding activity at 39% of the sites. Multiple daybeds were found at 28% of the sites and all sites were within 0.8 km of water. Bedding sites occurred on canyon walls 81% of the time, the slopes of which averaged 39%. Daybeds were on the uphill side of a tree 74% of the time. Bed trees averaged 73 cm dbh. Chewing and scratching of daybed trees was recorded at 38% of the sites, and scats were found at 69% of the sites. Removal of vegetative cover and large trees in black bear bedding habitat could reduce overall habitat quality. Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 7:145-149 Black bear activity patterns and habitat use have Basin Conifer Woodland (Brown et al. 1979). Ridg- been documented in the western United States (Am- etops below 2,100 m are predominately pinyon pine strup and Beecham 1976, Lindzey and Meslow 1977, (Pinus edulis) and alligator juniper (Juniperus dep- LeCount et al. 1984, Unsworth 1984, Young 1984, peana); ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) is on the Mollohan 1985). Young (1984) and Unsworth (1984) west-facing slopes of major canyons and mixed con- briefly discussed black bear bedding sites but gave ifer on the east-facing slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Earthquake Activity in 1989
    Summary of Earthquake Activity in Arizona for 1989 NORTHERN ARIZONA ~ 2.0. The rest of1989 at theSouthRim was SOUTHERN ARIZONA quiet, except for three earthquakes of M by David S. Brumbaugh, Director 2.9,2.8, and 2.2 inSeptember, one of ML3.& by Terry C. Wallace Arizona Earthquake Information Center in November, and one ofML2.9 in Decem­ Department of Geosciences ber (Table 1). University of Arizona The year 1989 was marked by a sharp Activity onthe MogollonPlateau south­ increase in earthquake activity. This capped east of Flagstaff was initiated by an ML3.4 The University of Arizona operates a a trend during the last half of the decade earthquake at Chavez Mountain on April World Wide Standardized Seismic Network towards larger and more frequent events 18. Events continued through September (WWSSN) station, TUC, in the Catalina (Figure 1). The number of earthquakes of 1989, at times in swarms. Two other earth­ Mountains. The station's instrumentation local magnitude equal to or exceeding 2.0 quakes of ML~ 3.0 occurred onJuly 17 and consists of six seismographs: three short­ (ML~ 2.0) increased nearly200 percent over September 6. The latter shock was part ofa period components and three long-period that in 1988. Nearly all ofthe events were cluster of five events that day near Sunset components. The former are run at high concentrated in three areas in the northern Mountain. magnification (100,000 X) and are extremely part of the State: the Grand Canyon, the Other than the ML4.0 events at the can­ effective for monitoring seismic activity Mogollon Plateau, and the Arizona Strip yon, the largest earthquakes in northern within 500 kilometers of Tucson.
    [Show full text]
  • Manganese Deposits in the Artillery Mountains Region Mohave County, Arizona
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather. Director Bulletin 936-R MANGANESE DEPOSITS IN THE ARTILLERY MOUNTAINS REGION MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA BY S. G. LASKY AND B. N. WEBBER Strategic Minerals Investigations. 1942 (Pages 417-448) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1944 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. Price $1.25 CONTENTS Page 4 Abstract................................................... 417 Introduction.............................................. 418 Acknowledgments....................................... 420 Geography................................................. 420 -* Geology................................................... 422 Manganese-bearing formation........................... 425 Manganese deposits........................................ 427 General character..................................... 428 Sandstone ore..................................... - 430 Clay ore.......................................... 431 Hard or supergene ore............................. 432 Extent and thickness................................... 433 Upper zone........................................ 433 Maggie block.................................. 434 Upper Chapin block............................ 435 Lower Chapin block............................ 435 Price block................................... 437 Sees. 23 and 26, T. UN., R. 13 W............ 437 Lower zone........................................ 437 Origin................................................
    [Show full text]
  • V·Lvi·I University Microfilms International a Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road
    Sedimentologic characteristics and paleogeographic implications of Tertiary sedimentary rocks in the upper plate of the Harcuvar metamorphic core complex, northern Rawhide and Artillery Mountains, Arizona Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Yarnold, John Christopher Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 06/10/2021 08:42:50 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187560 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]