DOCSLIB.ORG

Development Team

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development Team Paper No. : 10 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Module : 18 Symbolic and Interpretive Anthropology Development Team Principal Investigator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Paper Coordinator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Sarika Negi Content Writer Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Prof. Subir Biswas, Department of Anthropology, West Content Reviewer Bengal State University, Barasat, West Bengal 1 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology Symbolic and Interpretive Anthropology Description of Module Subject Name Anthropology Paper Name 10 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Module Name/Title Symbolic and Interpretive Anthropology Module Id 18 2 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology Symbolic and Interpretive Anthropology Contents Introduction 1. History Of The Interpretive Research Tradition 2. Interpretive Anthropology 2.1 Geertzian Anthropology 2.2 Turner’s Anthropology 3. A Critical Perspective on Interpretative Anthropology 3.1 Objectification of researcher 3.2 Causality and Interpretation of culture 3.3 Validation in the interpretive anthropology 4. Recent trends in Cognitive anthropology Summary Learning Outcomes To develop an understanding about the concept of interpretive and symbolic Anthropology To know about the contribution of various scholars to the concept To be able to critically analyze the topic To know about the recent trends in Cognitive Anthropology 3 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology Symbolic and Interpretive Anthropology Introduction The anthropological studies seeks aspects of social structure & the analogy involved, which has been taken to the area of understanding of people’s action and how the structure has been placed with the help of symbols and decoding their meaning understood by a shared understanding of the people. It has been quoted in anthropological language “reading between lines”, mean interpreting underlying ‘meaning or message’ (understanding the social code underlying those actions). The interpretive theorists believed that, reality is not ‘out there’ but in people’s mind and the reality is experienced internally, constructed in social realm through interaction and interpreted by the actors, and is based on the definition people attach to it. The primary desire of present Ethnographic approach is to outline the ‘native point of view’ and to explain how different ‘cultural design of reality’ affects ‘social action’. It emphasizes on the peoples’ shared understanding of their own culture, how they locate their own self in it and their experiences. The culture is attributed to the agglomeration of symbols having particular meaning and which is interpreted via actors and therefore interpretive can be understood as study of actor-centred action. In anthropological literature Geertz was the leading figure in Interpretive Anthropology, he considered the concept of culture essentially, ‘Semiotic’ one, i.e. symbolic. Interpretive anthropology is referred as Symbolic Anthropology as well. It has two lines running parallel to each other headed by two different leaders inheriting ideas from different ideals. Symbolic anthropology is led by both, Clifford Geertz and Victor Turner, Geertz was influenced by Max Weber and Turner was influenced by Durkheim. 1. HISTORY OF THE INTERPRETIVE RESEARCH TRADITION It grew out of convergence of disciplines such as philosophy, phenomenology, hermeneutics, ethno- methodology and sociology. The interpretive social science can be related to the work of Giovanni Batista Vico (1668-1744), Dilthey (1833-1911) and most of all of Weber (1864-1920). In his work Vico consciously developed his idea of scienza (science or knowledge) in opposition to Descartes’ philosophy, the most basic idea from which all knowledge could be derived by way of deductive rules. Vico criticized it in a way that it renders phenomena which cannot be expressed logically or mathematically as illusions of one sort or another. He argued that, complete knowledge of any thing involves ‘how it came to be’, ‘what it is’ as a ‘result of human action’ and the principle attribute of human beings. He is relatively unrecognized for his ideas but, cannot be denied credit for developing vision of human centred phenomena and explanation of these. He emphasized on the cause of phenomena which is a step towards producing a theory. His ideas penetrated in social sciences directly or indirectly in one or the other way. 4 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology Symbolic and Interpretive Anthropology Interpretive drew ideas from hermeneutics too; a prominent figure who made contribution towards the present context was Dilthey who was a historian cum sociologist cum hermeneutic philosopher. Dilthey proposed that the human being live in a web having meanings and that they make these webs them self and to study human we need to comprehend those webs. He is the one who distinguished between human science (Geisteswissenschaften) and natural science (Naturwissenschaften) and also suggested for implementation of hermeneutic methodology to social sciences. Hermeneutics is a subject directed study, drawn from word “Hermes “, a Greek god who was given the job of delivering and interpreting the messages of the other gods for humans. From this came the word ‘Hermeneus’ or ‘interpreter’. The hermeneutic as an ideology came into the social sciences with the close and careful study of all free flowing texts. The hermeneutic approach stress (1) on myths or narrative having meaning in a collective consciousness of the society in sense or knowledge of culture (2) it is the job of social researcher to discover those meaning (3) an acknowledgment to that, the meaning can change with time and can also be different for groups or sub-groups with in a society. In sociology as well Ethno methodology emerged as a critique methodology of conventional sociology which was founded by Harold Garfinkel, a sociologist. Garfinkel wrote ‘Studies in Ethno methodology’ in 1967 in which he showed concern for the methodological problems in understanding of social order. He cited Ethno methodology as the investigation of logical properties of indexical expressions and other practical actions as cause of on -going achievement of organized practices of everyday life. The indirect influence from Durkheim can be traced when, Garfinkel, talks of expression and actions in a relation to the collectively of people. He explained the concept of ‘common culture’ as socially approved ground of inference and action that people use in their everyday affairs and which are assumed by actors as in common or used by others in the same way and these approved facts consists of explanations from the point of view of the members in collective manner. Garfinkel was majorly influenced by Alfred Schutz, whose worked to bridged traditions, sociology and phenomenology but, Garfinkel never denied of ideas brought from sociologists like Talcott Parsons (action theory), who in turn was admirer of sociologist like Max Weber and Durkheim (collective consciousness) and phenomenologist’s like Edmund Husserl (1859-1938). Although interpretivism differed from phenomenology but, phenomenology has contribution in developing this theoretical perspective. In sociological tradition, it was Max Weber whose approach of ‘Verstehen’, was taken up even in Hermeneutics and other sciences, which is deciphered as ‘understanding’. He held a prominent figure in relation to interpretivism as developed interpretive sociology. It was Weber and his followers who gradually took forth the idea of understanding texts to understanding actors and their social life in general. Weber’s idea was that, man is an animal suspended in the webs of significance, which was adopted by Geertz therefore only he was the one taking culture as webs and he propounded use of 5 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology Symbolic and Interpretive Anthropology interpretive analysis instead of experimental science for examining such webs of significance. Weber in 1978 said that, ‘sociology is a science concerning itself with the interpretative understanding of social action and thereby with a causal explanation of its course and consequences… speak of action insofar as the acting individual attaches a subjective meaning to his behaviour (Keyes, 2002). 2. Interpretive Anthropology: Interpretivism in anthropological historical discourse was used by Evans Pritchard when he wrote literature on Nuer Religion but, the flagship went to Geertz as this tradition is best reflected in his work and is pursued in his every piece of work. In the anthropological writing a paradigm shift could be observed with Pritchard but, became very much visible with Geertzian ideas and work. His work ‘The Interpretation of Culture’ came in 19th year when Pritchard passed and became a landmark in the interpretive anthropology. Geertz’s work is often seen as a reaction to the disappointment with Levi Strauss’s work on meaning, where contrast between characters of culture was covered and not on the meaning. 2.1 Geertzian Anthropology Clifford Geertz proposed interpretative analysis in order to study culture and the webs of significance. He utilized Gilbert Ryle’s’ notion of “Thick Description” to define the original aim of anthropology. In actual sense, Ryle’s example of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Victor Turner and Contemporary Cultural Performance, Graham St
    Victor Turner and Contemporary Cultural Performance, Graham St. John, (ed) 2008 New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books. £47.50 hbk ix + 358 pages ISBN 978-1-84545-462-3 Victor Witter Turner (1920 – 1983), working with his wife Edith Turner, was an anthropologist deeply concerned with ritual both in tribal communities and in the contemporary developed world. His early fieldwork in African villages in the 1950s was typical of the career development of field anthropologists at that time. He developed a special interest in rituals, seeing these as social drama in addition to the religious expression of the sacred. He drew on the work of Arnold van Gennep (1960, originally 1908) on rites of passage (viz. birth, marriage, death and sometimes puberty initiation), translated into English in 1960: Turner focused on the concept of limen, ‘threshold’ and the term liminality. Van Gennep added pre-liminal separation or isolation from, and post-liminal reincorporation into, one’s community as a threefold schema. The context was tribal and religious, with gods and spirits demanding to be appeased. Turner applied this retrospectively to his own fieldwork, and far beyond van Gennep’s work, developed the concept to embrace all transitions and all rituals everywhere. He bracketed out academic scepticism about tribal religion and focused on how the people experienced the ritual. Ritual as social drama gives it a significant social function, to dispel conflict and schism and to mend quarrels. He then applied this concept to western developed society to explore how conflict is resolved and what replaces ritual in a secular context.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuc Riti Ia I 111 Lb
    TUC RITI IA I 111 LB. 11 1 1 %J i \ L» i""^ /^®% P H & ^^^^ ^^^r ^^^y v^—^g Structure and Anti-Structure VICTOR TURNER The Lew/s Hen/y Morgan Lectures | 7966 presented at The University of Rochester, Rochester, New York Cornell Paperbacks Cornell University Press ITHACA, NEW YORK lite.*..- SYMBOL, MYTH, AND RITUAL SERIES General Editor: Victor Turner Raymond Firth, Symbols: Public and Private* Eva Hunt, The Transformation of the Hummingbird: Cultural Roots of a Zinacanlecan Mythical Poem Bennetta Jules-Rosette, African Apostles: Ritual and Conversion in the Church of John Maranke* Sally Falk Moore and Barbara G. Myerhoff, eds., Symbol and Politics in Communal Ideology: Cases and Questions^ Barbara G. Myerhoff, Peyote Hunt: The Sacred Journey of the Huicho'l Indiansj Victor Turner, Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Socielyj Victor Turner, Revelation and Divination in Ndembu Ritual^ Victor Turner, The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structurej Roy Wagner, Lethal Speech: Daribi Myth as Symbolic Obviation *Also available in a Cornell Paperbacks edition. tAvailable from Cornell University Press only in a Cornell Paperbacks edition. To the memory of Allan Holmberg this book is respectfully dedicated. Copyright © ig6g by Victor W. Turner Foreword to Cornell Paperbacks edition copyright © 1977 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information address Cornell University Press, 124 Roberts Place, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published ig6g by Aldine Publishing Company. First published, Cornell Paperbacks, 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbols and Rituals: an Interpretive Approach to Faith- Based Behavior
    SYMBOLS AND RITUALS: AN INTERPRETIVE APPROACH TO FAITH- BASED BEHAVIOR By: James A. Forte Presented at: NACSW Convention 2014 November, 2014 Annapolis, Maryland | www.nacsw.org | info@nacsw.org | 888-426-4712 | Symbols and Rituals: An Interpretive Approach to Faith-Based Behavior Presentation at National Association of Christian Social Workers, Annual Conference Annapolis, Maryland November 8, 2014 James A. Forte Professor, Salisbury University Symbols and Rituals (Geertz and Faith Behavior) Memorable Words “The phrase ‘nothing is a practical as good theory’ is a twist of an older truth: Nothing improves theory more than its confrontation with practice” (Hans Zetterberg, 1962, page 189). Symbols and Rituals (Geertz and Faith Behavior) Overview: Framework for Making Sense of Geertz’s Theory Models – Exemplary root theorists Metaphors – Theory’s root metaphors Mapping – Theoretical elements and relations, Translation to eco-map Method - Directives for further inquiry & theory use Middle-range Theory-based applications (Inquiry theorizing and planned change) Marks of Critical thinking about theory Excellence Symbols and Rituals (Geertz and Faith Behavior) Clifford Geertz and The Symbolic Anthropology Approach This approach to religion and spirituality provides an analysis of the system of meanings embodied in the symbols and expressed in rituals which make up the religion or spiritual system (for a focal social group), and the relating of these systems to social-structural and psychological processes (Geertz, 1973, page 125). Symbols
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Betwixt and Between: Revising Liminality in the Context of a Teacher Preparation Program Alison Cook-Sather Bryn Mawr College, Acooksat@Brynmawr.Edu
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Education Program Faculty Research and Education Program Scholarship 2006 Newly Betwixt and Between: Revising Liminality in the Context of a Teacher Preparation Program Alison Cook-Sather Bryn Mawr College, acooksat@brynmawr.edu Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/edu_pubs Part of the Education Commons Custom Citation Cook-Sather, Alison, “Newly Betwixt and Between: Revising Liminality in the Context of a Teacher Preparation Program,” Anthropology and Education Quarterly 37 (2006): 110-127. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/edu_pubs/9 For more information, please contact repository@brynmawr.edu. Newly Betwixt and Between: Revising Liminality in Learning to Teach. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 37, 2 (June 2006), 110-127. Alison Cook-Sather Bryn Mawr College, acooksat@brynmawr.edu Abstract Through an analysis of a contemporary rite of passage—the final stage of teacher preparation— the author develops a new theory of liminality that both builds on and extends Victor Turner’s enduring insights. The analysis focuses on how pre-service teachers in an undergraduate education program engage in a process of identity formation within an asynchronous, non- dimensional liminal space made possible and shaped by email and with the support of experienced mentor teachers. Key Words: liminal, transition, teacher preparation, identity formation, self “Betwixt and between” is a phrase Victor Turner used to capture the essence of his theory of “liminality,” a central feature of the framework he developed in the late 1960s to analyze rites of passage within tribal, sociocultural systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolic Anthropology Symbolic Anthropology Victor Turner (1920
    Symbolic Anthropology • Examines symbols & processes by which humans assign meaning. • Addresses fundamental Symbolic anthropology questions about human social life, especially through myth & ritual. ANTH 348/Ideas of Culture • Culture does not exist apart from individuals. • It is found in interpretations of events & things around them. Symbolic Anthropology Victor Turner (1920-1983) • Studied with Max Gluckman @ Manchester University. • Culture is a system of meaning deciphered by • Taught at: interpreting key symbols & rituals. • Stanford University • Anthropology is an interpretive not scientific • Cornell University • University of Chicago endeavor . • University of Virginia. • 2 dominant trends in symbolic anthropology • Publications include: • Schism & Continuity in an African Society (1957) represented by work of British anthropologist • The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual (1967) Victor Turner & American anthropologist • The Drums of Affliction: A Study of Religious Processes Among the Ndembu of Zambia Clifford Geertz. (1968) • The Ritual Process: Structure & Anti-Structure (1969). • Dramas, Fields, & Metaphors (1974) • Revelation & Divination in Ndembu Ritual (1975) Social Drama Social drama • • Early work on village-level social processes among the For Turner, social dramas have four main phases: Ndembu people of Zambia 1. Breach –rupture in social relations. examination of demographics & economics. 2. Crisis – cannot be handled by normal strategies. • Later shift to analysis of ritual & symbolism. 3. Redressive action – seeks to remedy the initial problem, • Turner introduced idea of social drama redress and re-establish • "public episodes of tensional irruption*” 4. Reintegration or schism – return to status quo or an • “units of aharmonic or disharmonic process, arising in conflict situations.” alteration in social arrangements. • They represent windows into social organization & values .
    [Show full text]
  • What's in a Meme?
    What’s in a Meme? The Development of the Meme as a Unit of Culture Garry Chick The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania, USA Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association as part of the session, “Perceiving Culture: Unit Definition in Cultural Anthropology,” November 21, 1999. Please do not quote without permission. An earlier version of this paper is in press in Social Science Today (in Russian). Abstract Over the past 150 years numerous labels have been applied to the “parts” of culture. Some of these, including “themes,” “configurations,” “complexes,” and “patterns” are macro level. Micro level terms include “ideas,” “beliefs,” “values,” “rules,” “principles,” “symbols,” “concepts,” and a few others. The macro level labels often appear to be particular arrangements of micro level units. But which of these, if any, is the (or, an) operational unit of cultural transmission, diffusion, and evolution? Recently proposed units of cultural transmission typically derive from analogies made between cultural and biological evolution. Even though the unit of selection in biological evolution (i.e., the gene, the individual, or the group) is still under debate, the “meme,” originally suggested by Dawkins (1976) as a cultural analog of the gene, has been “selected” by many as a viable unit of culture. A “science of memes” (“memetics”) has been proposed (Lynch 1996) and numerous web sites devoted to the meme exist on the internet. This paper will trace the development of the meme and, in the process, critically address its utility as a unit of culture. 2 The whole history of science shows that advance depends upon going beyond “common sense” to abstractions that reveal unobvious relations and common properties of isolatable aspects of phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Liminal to Liminoid in Play, Flow, and Ritual: an Essay in Comparative
    LIMINAL TO LIMINOID, IN PLAY, FLOW, AND RITUAL: AN ESSAY IN COMPARATIVE SYMBOLOGY by Victor Turner First I will describe what 1 mean by "comparative symbology" and how, in a broad way, it differs from such disciplines as "semiotics" (or "semiology") and "symbolic anthropology," which are also concerned with the study of such terms as symbols, signs, signals, significations, icons, signifiers, signi- fied~,sign-vehicles, and so on. Here, I want to discuss some of the types of sociocultural processes and settings in which new symbols, verbal and non- verbal, tend to be generated. This will lead me into a comparison of "liminal" and "liminoid" phenomena, terms which 1 will consider shortly. According to Josiah Webster's lexicographical progeny, the people who produced the second College edition of Webster's New World Dictionary, "symbology" is "the study or interpretation of symbols"; it is also "repre- sentation or expression by means of symbols." The term "comparative" merely means that this branch of study involves comparison as a method, as does, for example, comparative linguistics. Comparative symbology is narrower than "semiotics" or "semiology" (to use Saussure's and Roland Barthes's terms), and wider than "symbolic anthropology" in range and scope of data and problems. "Semiotics" is "a general theory of signs and symbols, especially, the analysis of the nature and relationship of signs in language, usually including three branches, syntactics, semantics, and pragmatics." 1) Syntactics: The formal relationships of signs and symbols to one an- other apart from their users or external reference; the organization and relationship of groups, phrases, clauses, sentences, and sentence structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Generic Hybridity in the Fiction of Mary Yukari Waters by Rania Samir Youssef
    Asian American Literature: Discourses and Pedagogies 3 (2012) 27-38. Betwixt and Between Past and Present: Cultural and Generic Hybridity in the Fiction of Mary Yukari Waters By Rania Samir Youssef A Klee painting named ‘Angelus Novus’ shows an angel looking as though he is about to move away from something he is fixedly contemplating. His eyes are staring, his mouth is open, his wings are spread. This is how one pictures the angel of history. His face is turned toward the past. The angel would like to stay, awaken the dead, and make whole what has been smashed. But a storm is blowing from Paradise: it has caught his wings with such violence that the angel can no longer close them. This storm irresistibly propels him into the future to which his back is turned, while the pile of debris before him grows skyward. This storm is what we call progress. Walter Benjamin 1968, 260 Humanity is increasingly turning back to its history, and in the process it contemplates, compares and adjusts whatever is offered by bygone generations and civilizations. As a result of the huge technology in science in general and in communication technology in particular, humanity is opening up to new cultures and is forever coming up with hybrid offspring, both physical and aesthetic, on an unprecedented scale. That is why cultural hybridity features strongly in contemporary American fiction, especially after the United States has emerged as the hegemonic capitalist power that attracts people from every corner of the world yielding a growing diversity and a rich cultural vigor.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Lévi-Strauss at His Centennial: Toward a Future Anthropology Albert Doja
    Claude Lévi-Strauss at his Centennial: toward a future anthropology Albert Doja To cite this version: Albert Doja. Claude Lévi-Strauss at his Centennial: toward a future anthropology. Theory, Culture and Society, SAGE Publications, 2008, 25 (7-8), pp.321-340. 10.1177/0263276408097810. halshs- 00405936 HAL Id: halshs-00405936 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00405936 Submitted on 5 Oct 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 321-340 097810 Doja (D) 1/12/08 11:52 Page 321 Published in: "Theory, Culture & Society", vol. 25 (7-8), 2008, pp. 321–340 Claude Lévi-Strauss at His Centennial Toward a Future Anthropology Albert Doja Abstract Lévi-Strauss’s centennial is an opportunity to show his inextricable connec- tions with the evolution of 20th-century thought and what these promise for 21st-century anthropology. He has mapped the philosophical parameters for a renewed ethnography which opens innovative approaches to history, agency, culture and society. The anthropological understanding of history, for instance, is enriched by methodical application of his mytho-logical analysis, in particular his claim that myths are ‘machines for the suppression of time’.
    [Show full text]
  • Frameworks of Analysis
    PART I Frameworks of Analysis INTRODUCTION Tony Bennett then examine the forms of cultural analysis that have been associated It is clear from our discussion in the general with the development of psychological and introduction that it is impossible to tie the sociological thought. Peter Burke’s discussion term ‘culture’ to a single concept or to a of cultural history provides a bridge into simple history of usage. It is better understood the next group of chapters focused mainly as referencing a network of loosely related on text-based disciplines. James English’s concepts that has been shaped by the relations account of the role that the analysis of form between the different histories and fields of has played in the development of literary usage with which the term has came to be studies is followed here by Tia DeNora’s entangled. A significant factor here has been consideration of music as both text and the different meanings deriving from the ways performance. Mieke Bal then examines the in which the concept has been used and relations between art history and the more interpreted in the social science disciplines recent development of visual culture studies. one the one hand and in the humanities The next two chapters – Tom Gunning’s on the other. These different disciplinary discussion of film studies and Toby Miller’s articulations of the concept are the focus account of broadcasting – are concerned with of the contributions composing this first the forms of cultural analysis that have been part of the book, which also assesses how developed in relation to the two main media the ‘cultural turn’ has affected developments systems of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • SYMBOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY ANTH 4135/6135 Tuesday, Thursday 2-3
    SYMBOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY ANTH 4135/6135 Tuesday, Thursday 2-3:20 GC 2575 Copyright © 2018 by Bojka Milicic This syllabus cannot be reproduced or posted on the Internet without author’s permission. Hung Shing Temple, Kau Sai Chau Island, Hong Kong Territory © B. Milicic Instructor: Bojka Milicic, Ph.D., Associate Professor-Lecturer E-mail: milicic@anthro.utah.edu Office: Gardner Commons 4558 (Department of Anthropology) Office hours: Thursday 1-2. This course is accessible to all majors. Non-Contract Note.!“ The syllabus is not a binding legal contract. It may be modified by the instructor when student is given reasonable notice of the modification. “ Description: Anthropologists and other social and behavioral scientists often debate the interaction between nature and culture. This course argues that the foundation of human culture is based on our capacity to produce symbols. Culture cannot exist without symbols. We will explore the anthropological approach to various facets of symbolism and meaning by looking at both human biological make up and cultural variation. The course provides the basis for an understanding of the unity of the human mind and describes and explains cross-cultural differences. The basic theoretical assumption is that universal cognitive processes organize our perception of the world, while each culture chooses a particular interpretation through its worldview or cosmology. This hypothesis will be tested on ethnographic examples. We will review classic theories, models, and ethnographies as well as the recent findings, on symbolic communication in anthropology, archaeology, linguistics, and cognitive studies with examples ranging from prehistory to the cotemporary Western culture. We will study the symbolism of colors, food, animals, human body, gender, art, myth, ritual, and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnomusicology Or Transcultural Musicology?
    EDITED BY FRANCESCO GIANNATTASIO GIOVANNI GIURIATI Perspectives on a 21st Century Comparative Musicology: Ethnomusicology or Transcultural Musicology? stems from the ‘International Seminars in Ethnomusicology’ that F. Giannattasio conceived within the activities of the Intercultural Institute for Comparative Music Studies of the Fondazione Giorgio Cini, devoted st to a wide reflection on aims, methods and objects of study of PERSPECTIVES ON A 21 CENTURY ethnomusicology in the light of the profound changes occurring in COMPARATIVE MUSICOLOGY: this field at the beginning of the 21st Century. It concerns a radical rethinking - at a theoretical and epistemological level - of the history of the discipline, due to the contemporary profound transformation ETHNOMUSICOLOGY OR of the object of study. The volume has the ambition of offering new (EDS) GIURIATI GIOVANNI FRANCESCO GIANNATTASIO views on what a comparative musicology could do in its enquiry into TRANSCULTURAL MUSICOLOGY? contemporary music making processes. Scholars coming from different parts of the world, and from different fields of study such as W. Welsch, L.-Ch. Koch, T. Rice, S. Feld, J. Guilbault, J-L. Amselle, contributed to the volume presenting theoretical approaches as an implicit or explicit reaction to the CENTURY theoretical issues presented by Giannattasio. Together with them, st some Italian scholars (G. Giuriati, C. Rizzoni, G. Vacca, R. Di Mauro, M. Agamennone, F. Gervasi) present their thoughts drawn from research in two contexts identified as case studies: the area of BOOK IM05 Naples and its surroundings, and the Salento. MUSICOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ETHNOMUSICOLOGY OR PERSPECTIVES ON A 21 PERSPECTIVES MUSICALI ioni ez TRANSCULTURAL MUSICOLOGY? rs inte 30,00 € BOOK IM 05 Intersezioni Musicali BOOK IM05 Series editor: Giovanni Giuriati Editorial board: Francesco Giannattasio, Maurizio Agamennone, Vito Di Bernardi, Serena Facci Editing: Claudio Rizzoni Translation: Ruggero Bianchin (chapter 10), David Kerr (chapters 12-15), David J.
    [Show full text]