Forthwith. the Table Below Shows the Names of the Judges Recommended

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forthwith. the Table Below Shows the Names of the Judges Recommended Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) 6 indefinitely sitting on these names that have been reiterated by the Collegium and thus subverting the appointment process by these dilatory tactics. Besides this the Collegium has also unanimously reiterated the name of Justice K.M. Joseph as judge of the Hon'ble Supreme Court which must hence be notified by the government forthwith. The table below shows the names of the Judges recommended for appointments and whose names have been reiterated, yet the government has not notified their appointments. This is against the settled law on judicial appointments as laid down in the second judges case, whereby if the Supreme Couft Collegium sends its recommendations to the union government, the government may send the name back for reconsideration by the Collegium. However, if the collegium reiterates its recommendation unanimously, the President is bound to issue the warrant of appointment. s. Neue or Counr PENDING REcoMMENDED Respouse rnou REITERATION No PERSON WITH ON Govenrmerr RECOMMENDED 1 lustice K.M Supreme Chief 10.01.2018 Rejected, Reiterated Joseph, Chief Court Justice vide Letter unanimously Justice, High of India dated by SC Court of 26.04.20t8 Collegium Uttrakhand on 16.07.2018 2 lustice P&H High GOI 26.03.2018 Made an Reiterated Ramendra Court observation on Jain on on 17.04.2018 Impending Transfer Reiterated 3 Mr. Krishna Karnataka GOI 23. 08.2016 Appointment on Bhat, PrinciPal High was stalled 06.04.20t7 District & Couft after a complaint Sessions was filed Judge, against him Bangalore before CII Rural TS Thakur Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) ? 4 Mr. Basharat Allahabad GOI 4.04.20t6 Centre citing Reiterated Ali Khan High some by collegium Court complaints within days I against him 5 Mr. Allahabad GOI 16.11.2016 Centre citing Reiterated Mohammad High some by collegium Mansoor Court complaints within days against him 6 Mr. Calcutta GOI Early 2016 Sent Back Reiterated Mohammad High on11.11.201 on Nizamuddin Court 6& 15,11.2016 I 0t.03.20t7 &7.04.20t7 APPOINTMENT OF JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH AS JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT 5. The name of Justice K.M. Joseph, Chief Justice of the High Couft of Uttrakhand, was recommended for appointment as Judge of the this Hon'ble Court, by the collegium vide resolution dated 10.01.2018. The Collegium resolution states, "The collegium considers that at present Mr. lustice K.M. Joseph, who hails from Kerala High Court and is currently functioning at Chief Justice of Uttrakhand High Court, is more deseruing and suitabte in all respects than other Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High courts for being appointed as Judges of the Supreme Court of India. While recommending the name of Mr. lustice K.M. Joseph, the Cottegium has taken into consideration combined seniority on all-India basis of Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts, apaft from their merit and integrity" (A copy of the Collegium resolution dated 10.01.2018, is annexed as Annexure P 1at (Pages 3o to 3z- 7. The recommendation was kept pending for four months after whichthenameofJusticeK'M.Josephwasrejectedbythe The rejection union government vide letter dated 26th Rpril 2018. placed at number 42 was on the ground that lustice Joseph was Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) 7 on the all India High Court Judges' Seniority List with 11 Chief Justices of various High Courts who are senior to him. Further that if appointed the State of Kerala would have two Judges in the Supreme Court and that various other High Courts were not represented in the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The executive thereby referred back the recommendation to the Collegium for reconsideration. (A copy of the letter from the Union executive to the Chief Justice of India dated 26.04.20L8, is annexed as Annexure P - 2 at (Page 33 to 3b 7. That on 16.07.2018, the Collegium reiterated its recommendation dated 10. 01.2018, for elevation of Mr. lustice K.M. Joseph, as Judge of the Supreme Court. The Collegium resolution reiterating the appointment stated: "The Collegium, on due consideration of all the aspects mentioned in the aforesaid two letters, resolves to reiterate the afore-mentioned recommendation, especially since nothing adverse regarding suitability of Mr lustice K.M. Koseph has been pointed out in the aforesaid leffers (A copy of the Collegium resolution dated 16.07.2018, is annexed as Annexure P - 3 at (Page 3Ia .D) APPOINTMENT OF THE HIGH COURT JUDGES WHOSE NAMES HAVE BEEN REITERATED BYTHE COLLEGIUM B. The name of Justice Ramendra lain is a striking case of executive interference and malafide action in completely bypassing the collegium recommendation and the law as laid down by this Hon'ble couft on the judicial appointments. lustice Jain was initially recommended by judge of the Supreme Court Collegium for appointment as permanent The collegium Punjab and Haryana High Couft on 26th March 2018' resolution states: Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) q "Taking into consideration the materials on record, including the recommendation of the High Court Collegium, views of our consultee colleagues and the report of the Judgement Eualuation Committee, the Collegium finds Mr Justice Ramendra Jain, Additional Judge, suitable for appointment as Permanent Judge. In view of the above, the collegium resolves to recommend that Mr. Justice Ramendra Jain, Additional Judge, be appointed as Permanent Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.' (A copy of the Collegium resolution dated 26.03.2018, is annexed as Annexure P - 4 at (Pase 38-.o 31 I 9.The government sent back the file to the Collegium for reconsideration. 10. On t7.04.2018, the Collegium reiterated the recommendation for appointment of Justice Ramendra lain as Permanent Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court. The collegium resolution stated: "The Collegium, on reconsideration, resolves to reiterate its recommendation for appointment of Mr lustice Ramendra Jain as Permanent Judge of Punjab & Haryana High Court, especialty when no specific reason except the issue of his transfer for seeking reconsideration has been recorded in the file ...We do not see any good ground for linking the proposal of transfer of Mr Justice Ramendra lain with the propoal for his appointment as Permanent Judge and even for revisiting, at this cruciat juncture, the above-referred decision dated 2dh the March 2018, for his appointment as Permanent Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court' Inviewoftheabove,itwouldontybeappropriatethatthe Jain as proposat for appointment of Mr Justice Ramendra High Court is permanent Judge of the Punjab and Haryana Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) lo processed most expeditiously keeping in view that the curent term of Mr Justice Ramendra lain is going to expire very shortly on lqh April 2018." (A copy of the Collegium resolution dated 17.04.2018, is annexed as q Annexure P - 5 at (Page j{9ao Ir 11. Despite this reiteration by the Collegium, the government in blatant disregard for the mandate of the appointment process and the primacy of the opinion of the Collegium once reiterated, appointed Justice Ramendra Jain as Additional Judge of the Punjab & Haryana High Couft on 19.04.2018. (A copy of the government notification dated 19.04.2018, appointing Justice Ramendra Jain as Additional Judge of the Punjab & Haryana High Court is annexed as Annexure P - 6 (Page $&o \l3 I 12. Mr. Krishna Bhat, Principal District & Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural, was recommended by the collegium for appointment as Judge of the Karnataka High Couft on 23.08.2016. However his appointment was stalled after a sexual harassment complaint was received by the Chief Justice of India. The then Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, Justice S.K. Mukerjee submitted a report to the Chief Justice of India giving Mr. Bhat a clean chit. Despite this the government withheld his elevation while accepting the recommendations of five others although all the five were juniors to Mr. Krishna Bhat' The appointment was then reiterated by the Supreme Court collegium on 6.04.20t7. The executive then wrote directly to the chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, who ordered a fresh probe into the complaint against Mr. Krishna Bhat and submitted a repoft clearing him of all allegations' law ministry or the Centre can 13. It is pertinent to point out that the who is the head of the interact only with the Chief lustice of India with the Chief lustices of the High Collegium and cannot directly deal Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) lt Court, who come under the jurisdiction of the Chief Justice of India and the Collegium in matters of judicial appointments. In a scathing condemnation of this move by the centre, Justice Jasti Chelameswar (retired), wrote to the Hon'ble Chief lustice of India on 21* March 2018, recording the impropriety of the executive directly contacting the High Court to reassess a collegium recommendation of the Supreme Court. He stated in his letter that the matter was "ripe for the consideration of the Full Court on the judicial side..." (A copy of Hon'ble lustice lasti Chelameswar's letter to the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India, dated 21* March 2018 is annexed as Annexure P-7at(Page t+t{ to QB r 14, The names of Mr. Basharat Ali Khan and Mr. Mohammad Mansoor were recommended for appointment as Judges of the Allahabad High Court by the Supreme Court collegium on 4.4.2016 and 16.11.2016. According to media repofts, the government cited some complaints against them and returned their files for reconsideration by the Supreme Court collegium. The report further states that the complaints were frivolous and so the collegium reiterated their names within days.
Recommended publications
  • Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-02-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) 7 C.A. No. 11951-11958/2018 XVII-A M/S ASHOK LEYLAND LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] {Mention Memo} I.A. NO.7957 OF 2020 WITHDRAWAL OF CASE IA No. 169013/2018 - EX-PARTE STAY IA No. 169012/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 173095/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 7957/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION 19 Diary No. 1234-2020 II-B UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus RUTUGNA A. TRIVEDI AND ANR. FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.28052/2020- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.28053/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT COURT NO. : 3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 1 16 C.A. No. 1554/2020 III-A M/S INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO LTD RAJAN NARAIN Versus COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOOD AND SERVICE TAX COMMISSIONERATE FOR ADMISSION and IA No.28234/2020-EXPARTE STAY 16.1 Connected Diary No. 5063-2020 III-A R.K. GUPTA RAJAN NARAIN Versus COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COMMISSIONERATE, GHAZIABAD IA No.29902/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.29901/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.29900/2020-EX-PARTE STAY 23 Diary No.
    [Show full text]
  • Fcm:Rr 11M Wfcp ~ Qflttl Ttl "[Rl ~ F.Itr F."Igjcffi Cp'tcrrfug ~ (Ftt Cp't\5Ffift
    -print I '--"~l Government of India Department of Justice DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 26 MAN SINGH ROAD, JAISALME NEW DELHI-llOOll Dated: 26/11/2020 To Shri Sh. Neeraj Shrivastav Niwasi: H. No. 606/513, Purana Katra, Prayagraj 211002 Registration Number: JUSTCIRlT/20/00710 Dear Sir/Madam I am to refer to your Request for Information under RTI Act 2005, received vide letter dated 24/1112020 and to say that ~ fcp ~"Q"~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ Cf)Ql 11m W fcp flcITiiI ;tj I~ I(1~ ~ ~~ cp't CI~ ~ d I ~ f.1tITxur ~ ~"CR, Jf'U:fffi ~ fcm:rr 11m Wfcp ~ ;tj I~ I(14'j ~ ~~ /~ ~~ em QfI~~ "[RllJiildt:! ;tj1~1(1~ ~ q~l"RI ~ ~ ~ m~fflq>I~~1 cp't \lJl(ft WI m~~,~ CI~~dl Qflttl ttl "[Rl ~ ;tj I~ 1(1~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f.itR f."IgJCffi cp't crrfug ~ JfTUR "CR(ftT cp't\5ffift ~ I ~~~~ 2~~cq~, flcITiiI ;tj1~1(1~ cp't CI~~dl ~cp't~md"~WI. In case, you want to go for an appeal in connection with the information provided, you may appeal to the Appellate Authority indicated below within thirty days from the date of receipt of this letter. , Ms. HEM LATA FAA & Under Secretary (Appointment)/FAA Address: Department of justice, jaisalmer house, New Delhi-llOOll Phone No.: 23382978 Yours faithfully ( ARUN KUMAR AGGARWAL) CPIO & SECTION OFFICER(APPOINTMENT)/CPIO Phone No.: 23383037 Email: [email protected] • .. ~'1iCf) : 12.11.2020 ~\1lr1~~ ~ ~ ~ +j~IC1<:{ , ~mOO, ~-fcM, ~ ~ ~ ~~-110001 ~:~ cnr ~ ~ ctr um 6 q 7 rf> ~ ~ ~ ~I. 1. \3i£!clli -;:x:rrmCf1<:l C# IiI'141 <:{ ~ $ ClRtidfll ~ ~ ~ ct>~ >If()ft1rq I 2.
    [Show full text]
  • For Judgement
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 26-08-2020 Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE:- BY : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA SUPPLEMENTARY LIST Petitioner/Respondent SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Advocate FOR JUDGEMENT 1501 T.P.(C) No. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1] 496-509/2020 XVI-A Versus AGRICAS LLP AND ORS. B. RAMANA MURTHY[R-15], ANISHA UPADHYAY[R-23], SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1], [R-8], [R-27], [R-28], SOMIRAN SHARMA[R-30], [R-31] RUCHI a KOHLI[IMPL] VIVEK JAIN[INT], SIDDHANT BUXY[INT], NITIN MISHRA[INT], K. R. SASIPRABHU[INT], GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI[R-11], [R-14], [INT] [ HEARD BY : HON'BLE A.M. KHANWILKAR ,HON'BLE DINESH MAHESHWARI AND HON'BLE SANJIV KHANNA, JJ. ] IA No. 53677/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 54886/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 54884/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 55288/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 56983/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 54687/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 55097/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 54459/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 26-08-2020 Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) IA No.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Chambers of Hon'ble the Chief Justice
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 08-07-2021 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN (TIME : 1:30 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 8154-2021 PRABHAKAR TUKARAM SHINDE IX Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. IN SLP(C) No. - 12291/2020, IA No. 69668/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION IA No. 43829/2021 - ORAL HEARING NEW DELHI 06-07-2021 15:34:48 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 08-07-2021 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI (TIME : 1:30 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 1518-2021 MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY XI Versus RATANPAL (DEAD) AND ORS. IN SLP(C) No. - 6025/2017, IA No. 8136/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION NEW DELHI 06-07-2021 15:35:09 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 08-07-2021 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY (TIME : 1:35 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1002 Diary No. 10215-2021 DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India
    Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) 1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Re: Filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court. Against the sanctioned strength of 31 Judges, the Supreme Court of India is presently functioning with 26 Judges, leaving 05 clear vacancies. The Collegium comprising the Chief Justice of India and four senior-most Judges of the Supreme Court viz. Mr. Justices Madan B. Lokur, A.K. Sikri, S.A. Bobde and N.V. Ramana met on Wednesday, 12th December, 2018 to discuss the Agenda viz., (1) to consider and recommend names for appointment as Judges in the Supreme Court and (2) to consider proposals for transfer of Chief Justices and Judges of High Courts. The then Collegium on 12th December, 2018 took certain decisions. However, the required consultation could not be undertaken and completed as the winter vacation of the Court intervened. By the time the Court re-opened, the composition of the Collegium underwent a change. After extensive deliberations on 5th / 6th January, 2019, the newly constituted Collegium deemed it appropriate to have a fresh look at the matter and also to consider the proposals in the light of the additional material that became available. In terms of the above, this Collegium unanimously resolves to fill up, for the present, two of the five existing vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court. The Collegium has discussed names of Chief Justices as well as senior puisne Judges of all High Courts, eligible for elevation to the Supreme Court. The Collegium is of the considered view that at present the following persons are more deserving and suitable in all respects than other Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts, for being appointed as Judges of the Supreme Court of India: Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme Schedule of the Inaugural Session 20 January 2018 HALL
    Programme Schedule of the Inaugural Session 20 January 2018 HALL - I 9.55 AM Arrival of Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad, Hon'ble Union Law Minister, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Judge Supreme Court of India and Judge Incharge eCommittee and Hon'ble Dilip B. Bhosale, Chief Justice, Allahabad High Court and the State Law Minister in the Portico of Hall-I in JTRI. * Guard of Honour 10.00 AM Vande Mataram. * Lighting of Lamp. * Presentation of Bouquets. * Unveiling the Foundation Stone for “Extension of Hostel” and “Guest House” of JTRI 10.10 AM Welcome Address by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dilip Babasaheb Bhosale, Chief Justice, Allahabad High Court. 10.20 AM Address by Sri Brijesh Pathak, Hon'ble Law Minister, State of Uttar Pradesh. * Release of 'Handbook' and book on 'Digital Empowerment'. 10.25 AM Address by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Judge, Supreme Court of India and Judge Incharge, eCommittee Supreme Court of India. * Inauguration of WiFi Service in JTRI and the Division Bench eCourt in the Lucknow Bench 10.35 AM Address by Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad, Hon'ble Minister of Law & Justice and Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. * Presentation of Mementos. 10.52 AM Vote of Thanks by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dilip Gupta, Judge, Allahabad High Court and Chairperson, Computerisation Committee * National Anthem 11.00– 11.30 AM TEA- Lawns of JTRI NOTE: All the Hon'ble Judges, Dignitaries and Guests are requested to be seated in Hall-I by 9.50 am. WORKING SESSIONS 20 January 2018 Hall-I First Session (11.30 am – 01.00 pm) Topic-eCourts Project ON DAIS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Court Reference in Memory of Late Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. B. Sinha
    8th August, 1944 - 19th March, 2019 Full court Reference in the memory of Late Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. B. Sinha Former Judge, Supreme Court of India held on Wednesday, the 24th April, 2019 at 10.30 a.m. in the Court of The Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India INDEX Sl. No. Description Page Nos. 1. Letter from the Registrar, Supreme Court of India 1 2. List of Business at 10:30 A.M. for 24th April 2019 held in the Chief Justice's Court 2 3. Coram of Hon'ble Judges at the Full Court Reference 3 4. Reference made by Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India 4 - 6 5. Reference made by Ld. Attorney General for India 7 - 12 6. Reference made by the President, Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) 13 - 20 7. List of Attendees at the Full Court Reference 21 - 22 8. Family Members of Late Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. B. Sinha, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India 23 Letter from the Registrar, Supreme Court of India 1 List of Business for 24th April 2019 in respect of Full Court Reference 2 Coram of Hon'ble Judges at the Full Court Reference v Hon'ble Mr. Ranjan Gogoi, Chief Justice of India v Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. A. Bobde, J. v Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. V. Ramana, J. v Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra, J. v Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. F. Nariman, J. v Hon'ble Mr. Justice A. M. Sapre, J. v Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED: 28-08-2020 Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 5 Diary No. 11406-2020 XVII-A LARSEN AND TOUBRO GRAHAK SAHAKARI SAUSTHAN MARYADIT RAHUL GUPTA Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX MUMBAI II IA No.75204/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.75203/2020-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.75202/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL 10 W.P.(C) No. 856/2020 X HAJ AND UMRAH YATRA ORGANIZERS ASSOCIATION ZULFIKER ALI P. S Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION and IA No.77275/2020- APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS 12 W.P.(C) No. 860/2020 X ALL INDIA HAJ UMRAH TOUR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION RAJAT BHARDWAJ Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION 14 W.P.(C) No. 896/2020 X INDIAN HAJ UMRAH GROUP ASSOCIATION PALLAVI PRATAP Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION and IA No.79514/2020-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.79515/2020- EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT Court No. 4 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH (TIME : 10:30 AM) 5 Diary No. 7197-2020 IX UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 10-09-2020 Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE (TIME : 10:30 AM) 101 Crl.A. No. 152/2013 II-C TOFAN SINGH PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1] Versus THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU MANISH VASHISHTHA[R-1], B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1] NIKHIL JAIN[INT], AVADH BIHARI KAUSHIK[INT], ANZU. K. VARKEY[INT], AMIT K. NAIN[INT] PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE NAVIN SINHA AND HON'BLE INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ. [ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ] 101. 1 Connected Crl.A. No. 836/2011 II-B KIRAN KUMAR PRATIBHA JAIN Versus THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER C. K. SASI 101. 2 Connected Crl.A. No. 827/2010 II-B BAGICHA SINGH KANCHAN KAUR DHODI Versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB KULDIP SINGH, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R- Court No. 5 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA (TIME : 10:30 AM) 1 C.A. No. 10329/2018 III INDUS TOWER LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHAR Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-3], [R-4], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], [R-5] {Mention Memo} IA No. 86994/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cause-List-18Oct19.Pdf
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 18-10-2019 COURT NO. : 4 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 20 Diary No. 32913-2019 XVII-A CCE PATNA B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus M/S HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 18-10-2019 COURT NO. : 4 IA No.153378/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.153382/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.153380/2019-EX-PARTE STAY 21 Diary No. 33085-2019 III UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus M/S CHIRIPAL POLY FILMS LTD. AND ANR. FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.152434/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.152437/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES 21.1 Connected Diary No. 33087-2019 III UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus M/S MACRO POLYMERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.153184/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.153185/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES COURT NO. : 6 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 2 Diary No. 45346-2018 XVII-A C.G.ST C AND C.E. ALWAR B.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Calendar Meeting of the National Judicial
    ANNUAL CALENDAR MEETING OF THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL ACADEMY 9th MAY, 2015 Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, Judge Supreme Court of India Hon’ble Chief Justices and Judges in-charge of Judicial Education Meeting was conducted by Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India & Chairperson of NJA, Mr. Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice HL Dattu S. Name Designation High Court No. 1 Hon’ble Mr. Justice TS Thakur Judge Supreme Court of India S. Name of Judge Nominated/ Attending Designation High Court No. 2 Hon’ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud Chief Justice Allahabad 3 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dilip Babasaheb Bhosale Chief Justice Andhra Pradesh & Telangana 4 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohit S.Shah Chief Justice Bombay 5 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Manjula Chellur Chief Justice Calcutta 6 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha Chief Justice Chhattisgarh 7 Hon'ble Ms. Justice G. Rohini Chief Justice Delhi 8 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir Chief Justice Himachal Pradesh 9 Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar Chief Justice Jammu & Kashmir 10 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virendar Singh Chief Justice Jharkhand 11 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan Chief Justice Kerala 12 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul Chief Justice Madras 13 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Nath Singh Chief Justice Meghalaya 14 Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.K. Sinha Chief Justice Sikkim 15 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta Chief Justice Tripura 16 Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph Chief Justice Uttarakhand 17 Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Sreedhar Rao Acting Chief Justice Guwahati 18 Hon'ble Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • COURT NEWS Vol
    COURT NEWS Vol. XIV Issue No.1 January - March, 2019 EDITORIAL BOARD Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan, Judge, Supreme Court of India Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Judge, Supreme Court of India Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph, Judge, Supreme Court of India COMPILED BY Sanjeev Sudhakar Kalgaonkar, Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Bibhuti Bhushan Bose, Editor, Supreme Court of India A quarterly newsletter published by Supreme Court of India, New Delhi Also available on website : www.sci.gov.in LIST OF SUPREME COURT JUDGES (As on 31-03-2019) Date of Date of S.No. Name of the Hon’ble Judge Appointment Retirement 23-04-2012 Hon’ble Shri Ranjan Gogoi, 01 As CJI: 18-11-2019 Chief Justice of India 03-10-2018 02 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde 12-04-2013 24-04-2021 03 Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana 17-02-2014 27-08-2022 04 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Misra 07-07-2014 03-09-2020 05 Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.F. Nariman 07-07-2014 13-08-2021 06 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre 13-08-2014 28-08-2019 07 Hon’ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi 13-08-2014 20-07-2020 08 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit 13-08-2014 09-11-2022 09 Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar 13-05-2016 30-07-2022 10 Hon’ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud 13-05-2016 11-11-2024 11 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan 13-05-2016 05-07-2021 12 Hon’ble Mr.
    [Show full text]