DOCSLIB.ORG

Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED: 28-08-2020 Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 5 Diary No. 11406-2020 XVII-A LARSEN AND TOUBRO GRAHAK SAHAKARI SAUSTHAN MARYADIT RAHUL GUPTA Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX MUMBAI II IA No.75204/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.75203/2020-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.75202/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL 10 W.P.(C) No. 856/2020 X HAJ AND UMRAH YATRA ORGANIZERS ASSOCIATION ZULFIKER ALI P. S Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION and IA No.77275/2020- APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS 12 W.P.(C) No. 860/2020 X ALL INDIA HAJ UMRAH TOUR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION RAJAT BHARDWAJ Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION 14 W.P.(C) No. 896/2020 X INDIAN HAJ UMRAH GROUP ASSOCIATION PALLAVI PRATAP Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION and IA No.79514/2020-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.79515/2020- EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT Court No. 4 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH (TIME : 10:30 AM) 5 Diary No. 7197-2020 IX UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR Versus SHAH NANJI NAGSI EXPORTS PVT. LTD. FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.62121/2020- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.62122/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT 7 Diary No. 7957-2020 III UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus F. ROY CHOUDHARY AND ORS. SMARHAR SINGH[CAVEAT] The paper books of the earlier proceedings (SLP (C ) No. 28535/2019) placed alongwith main matter i.e SLP (C ) D.No. 7957 of 2020. IA No. 54721/2020 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES IA No. 54718/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 54719/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT 21 SLP(Crl) No. 3836/2020 II-C ABDINASIR UGAS ALI PRANAB PRAKASH Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS {Mention Memo} DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 28-08-2020 Court No. 4 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.79532/2020- EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.79533/2020- EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT Court No. 5 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 27 W.P.(C) No. 961/2018 X SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT LTD. ARJUN GARG Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-3], SACHIN PATIL[R-4], MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-5], [R-5] IA No. 151056/2018 - STAY APPLICATION IA No. 114989/2018 - STAY APPLICATION .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supreme Court of India
    Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Re: Filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court. Against the sanctioned strength of 31 Judges, the Supreme Court of India is presently functioning with 25 Judges, leaving six clear vacancies. The Collegium met today to consider filling up of these vacancies and after extensive discussion and deliberations unanimously resolves to fill up, for the present, two of these vacancies. The Collegium discussed names of Chief Justices and senior puisne High Court Judges eligible for appointment as Judges of the Supreme Court. The Collegium considers that at present Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph, who hails from Kerala High Court and is currently functioning as Chief Justice of Uttarakhand High Court, is more deserving and suitable in all respects than other Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts for being appointed as Judges of the Supreme Court of India. While recommending the name of Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph, the Collegium has taken into consideration combined seniority on all-India basis of Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts, apart from their merit and integrity. Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph was appointed as a Judge of the Kerala High Court on 14th October, 2004 and was elevated as Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court on 31st July, 2014 and since Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) 2 then has been functioning there. He stands at Sl. No.45 in the combined seniority of High Court Judges on all-India basis. We have also considered the names of eminent members of the Bar.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 14-10-2020 Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN 14 Diary No. 19651-2020 XVI-A FUTURE GAMING AND HOTEL SERVICES PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ROHINI MUSA Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. {Mention Memo} FOR ADMISSION and IA No.93221/2020-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.93219/2020- PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) Court No. 4 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY (TIME : 10:30 AM) 19 Diary No. 16528-2020 II UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus NAR SINGH MAJHI FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.82876/2020- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING Court No. 5 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI (TIME : 10:30 AM) 8 W.P.(C) No. 977/2020 X ALL INDIA HAJ UMRAH TOUR ORGANISERS ASSOCIATION MUMBAI GAURAV AGRAWAL Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION and IA No.85737/2020- EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.85736/2020-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS 9 W.P.(C) No. 926/2020 PIL-W FEDERAL MOGUL ANAND SEALINGS INDIA LIMITED AAKARSHAN ADITYA Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
    [Show full text]
  • NONREPORTABLE in the SUPREME COURT of INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6291 of 2019 (Arising
    Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6291 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 34239 of 2015) Joginder Singh & Anr. ¼Appellants versus ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company ¼Respondents J U D G M E N T INDU MALHOTRA, J. Leave granted. 1. The present Civil Appeal has been filed to challenge the final Judgment and Order dated 22.05.2015 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in FAO (MVA) No. 386 of 2014. The Appellants herein have filed the present Civil Appeal for enhancement of the compensation granted by the Motor 1 Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) Accident Claims Tribunal, Shimla (ªMACTº) and the High Court. 2. The factual matrix in which the present Civil Appeal arises is briefly stated as under :± 2.1. The daughter of the Appellants viz. Ambika Thakur was a student who was undertaking an Air Hostess Training Program at the Frankfinn Institute, Chandigarh. 2.2. On 10.9.2009, Ambika Thakur was travelling in a Verna car bearing Registration No. CH-04-H-0297 from Chandigarh to Bhatinda. The car met with an accident with a Tata Ace vehicle bearing Registration No. PB-03T-4804 which was being driven in a rash and negligent manner. The offending vehicle suddenly stopped in front of the Verna car, which led to head long collision between the two vehicles, and resulted in the death of Ambika Thakur on the spot. Ambika Thakur was 20 years old at the time of her death.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabarimala Temple Dedicated To
    REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3358/2018 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 373/2006 KANTARU RAJEEVARU ….PETITIONER(S) VERSUS INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION THR.ITS GENERAL SECRETARY AND ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) WITH R.P.(C) NO. 3359/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006; DIARY NO(S). 37946/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006; R.P.(C) NO. 3469/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006; DIARY NO(S). 38135/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006; DIARY NO(S). 38136/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006; R.P.(C) NO. 3449/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006 W.P.(C) NO. 1285/2018 R.P.(C) NO. 3470/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006 R.P.(C) NO. 3380/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006 R.P.(C) NO. 3379/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006 R.P.(C) NO. 3444/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006 R.P.(C) NO. 3462/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006 DIARY NO(S). 38764/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO.373/2006; DIARY NO(S). 38769/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO.373/2006; 1 DIARY NO(S). 38907/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO.373/2006; R.P.(C) NO. 3377/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO. 373/2006 DIARY NO(S). 39023/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO.373/2006; DIARY NO(S). 39135/2018 IN W.P.(C) NO.373/2006; DIARY NO(S).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the Supreme Court of India Civil Appellate
    1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7405 OF 2018 M/S SHIPRA HOTELS LTD. ... Appellant(s) Versus M/S. VALUE LINES INTERIORS PVT. LTD. ... Respondent(s) O R D E R Since the admission of the petition was on 01.06.2018, Section 12A, The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 enacted with effect from 06.06.2018 will not come into the picture. In this view of the matter, we set-aside the order dated 01.06.2018 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench and the impugned interim order dated 26.07.2018 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi and take on record the Memo of Settlement that has since been arrived at between the parties on 31.07.2018. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. ......................J. (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN) ......................J. (INDU MALHOTRA) New Delhi, Dated: 3rd August, 2018. 2 ITEM NO.62 COURT NO.9 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 7405/2018 M/S. SHIPRA HOTELS LTD Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S VALUE LINE INTERIORS PVT.LTD Respondent(s) ( in C.A. No. 8337 of 2017, in C.A. No. 8338 of 2017, IA No. 106197 of 2018-Exem. From filing c/c of the impugned judgment and IA No.106193/2018-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.106195/2018- PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS) Date : 03-08-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunrise 14 A/S Denmark Vs. Ravi Mahajan Appeal No
    IBC Laws| www.ibclaw.in I. Case Reference Case Citation : [2018] ibclaw.in 28 SC Case Name : Sunrise 14 A/S Denmark Vs. Ravi Mahajan Appeal No. : Civil Appeal Nos. 21794-21795 Of 2017 Appellant(s) : Sunrise 14 A/S Denmark Respondent(s) : Ravi Mahajan Date of Judgment : 03-Aug-18 Tribunal/Court : Supreme Court of India NCLAT decision : Ravi Mahajan Vs. Sunrise 14 A/S, Denmark II. Brief about the decision Petition filed by an advocate would be maintainable, as has been heldMacquarie in Bank. The said judgment would apply in the case offinancial creditors as well . III. Full text of the judgment ORDER Heard learned counsel for the parties. We are of the view that the order dated 28.07.2017 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh, after referring to the facts of this case and the fact that the appellant was a Danish Company, ultimately found ample evidence of default in the debt that was owed. The petition was, therefore, admitted.The National Company Appellate Tribunal, by the impugned judgment and order dated 06.12.2017, set aside the aforesaid judgment of the NCLT on the ground that the mandatory requirement of Section 7(3)(a), which included the filling up of a statutory form not having been done, and the application being made by an advocate and not by the party in person, allowed the appeal. The present is the case of a financial creditor who has moved the NCLT. InMacquarie Bank Limited Vs. Shilpi Cable Technologies Limited (2018) 2 SCC 674, we have since taken the view that, in the case of operational creditors, the petition filed by a foreign company need not observe such requirements of a statute which are impossible of compliance, namely, of getting a certificate from Indian financial institutions evidencing default in repayment of a debt.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-02-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) 7 C.A. No. 11951-11958/2018 XVII-A M/S ASHOK LEYLAND LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] {Mention Memo} I.A. NO.7957 OF 2020 WITHDRAWAL OF CASE IA No. 169013/2018 - EX-PARTE STAY IA No. 169012/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 173095/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 7957/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION 19 Diary No. 1234-2020 II-B UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus RUTUGNA A. TRIVEDI AND ANR. FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.28052/2020- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.28053/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT COURT NO. : 3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 1 16 C.A. No. 1554/2020 III-A M/S INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO LTD RAJAN NARAIN Versus COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOOD AND SERVICE TAX COMMISSIONERATE FOR ADMISSION and IA No.28234/2020-EXPARTE STAY 16.1 Connected Diary No. 5063-2020 III-A R.K. GUPTA RAJAN NARAIN Versus COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COMMISSIONERATE, GHAZIABAD IA No.29902/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.29901/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.29900/2020-EX-PARTE STAY 23 Diary No.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference ARBITRATION in the ERA of GLOBALIZATION the Third Edition February 8, 2020 | Federation House, Tansen Marg, New Delhi
    Supported by International Conference ARBITRATION IN THE ERA OF GLOBALIZATION The Third Edition February 8, 2020 | Federation House, Tansen Marg, New Delhi TENTATIVE PROGRAMME 9.30 AM – 10.30 AM REGISTRATION • Opening Remarks and session moderation: INAUGURAL SESSION Mr. Arun Chawla, Deputy Secretary General, FICCI & Advisor, ICA 10. 30 AM – 11.30 AM • Felicitation Address: Dr. Sangita Reddy, President, FICCI & Joint Managing Director, Apollo Hospitals Group • Welcome Address: Mr. N G Khaitan, President, ICA & Senior Partner, Khaitan & Co. • Inaugural Address: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde Chief Justice, Supreme Court of India • Concluding Address: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate & Vice President, ICA 11.30 AM – 11.45 AM TEA BREAK TECHNICAL SESSION - 1 ARBITRATION: INDIA AND THE GLOBAL CONTOURS 11.45 AM – 12.45 PM Chair/Keynote Speaker: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul Judge, Supreme Court of India Special Address: • Mr. James P. Duffy IV, Partner, Reed Smith LLP, New York • Mr. David Kavanagh QC, Partner & European Co-Head of Skadden’s International Litigation and Arbitration Group, London • Ms. Pallavi S. Shroff, Managing Partner, National Practice Head, Dispute Resolution, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co Advocates & Solicitors, Delhi • Mr. Nakul Dewan, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India (SILK:2019) & Barrister, Twenty Essex, London Q & A TECHNICAL SESSION - 2 EXPEDITED / SUMMARY PROCEDURES & EMERGENCY ARBITRATOR 12.45 PM – 01.45 PM Chair/Keynote Speaker: Hon’ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra Judge, Supreme Court of India Special Address: • Ms. Rebecca Sabben-Clare QC, 7 King’s Bench Walk Temple, London • Mr. Duncan Speller, Partner, Wilmer Hale, London & Barrister • Mr. Ganesh Chandru, Executive Partner, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys, New Delhi • Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
    1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 18-01-2021 Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN (TIME : 11:00 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 1 C.A. No. 9739/2010 XVII-A SHREE WARANA SAHAKARI DUDH UTPADAK PRAKRIYA SANGH LTD. MAHFOOZ AHSAN NAZKI[P-1] Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE PUNE II B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] IA No. 44804/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION 5 C.A. No. 105/2019 XVII-A M/S ESCORTS LTD PUNIT DUTT TYAGI Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX NEW DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] IA No. 24994/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION 5.1 Connected C.A. No. 3736/2019 XVII-A M/S EIH LTD PUNIT DUTT TYAGI Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX DELHI IA No. 44608/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION 7 C.A. No. 5220-5228/2019 XVII-A 2 M/S MSPL GASES LIMITED PRAMOD B. AGARWALA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] IA No. 58359/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION 8 C.A. No. 5056-5057/2019 XVII-A M/S PCS TECHNOLOGY LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF G.S.T AND CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] IA No. 198701/2019 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Fcm:Rr 11M Wfcp ~ Qflttl Ttl "[Rl ~ F.Itr F."Igjcffi Cp'tcrrfug ~ (Ftt Cp't\5Ffift
    -print I '--"~l Government of India Department of Justice DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 26 MAN SINGH ROAD, JAISALME NEW DELHI-llOOll Dated: 26/11/2020 To Shri Sh. Neeraj Shrivastav Niwasi: H. No. 606/513, Purana Katra, Prayagraj 211002 Registration Number: JUSTCIRlT/20/00710 Dear Sir/Madam I am to refer to your Request for Information under RTI Act 2005, received vide letter dated 24/1112020 and to say that ~ fcp ~"Q"~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ Cf)Ql 11m W fcp flcITiiI ;tj I~ I(1~ ~ ~~ cp't CI~ ~ d I ~ f.1tITxur ~ ~"CR, Jf'U:fffi ~ fcm:rr 11m Wfcp ~ ;tj I~ I(14'j ~ ~~ /~ ~~ em QfI~~ "[RllJiildt:! ;tj1~1(1~ ~ q~l"RI ~ ~ ~ m~fflq>I~~1 cp't \lJl(ft WI m~~,~ CI~~dl Qflttl ttl "[Rl ~ ;tj I~ 1(1~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f.itR f."IgJCffi cp't crrfug ~ JfTUR "CR(ftT cp't\5ffift ~ I ~~~~ 2~~cq~, flcITiiI ;tj1~1(1~ cp't CI~~dl ~cp't~md"~WI. In case, you want to go for an appeal in connection with the information provided, you may appeal to the Appellate Authority indicated below within thirty days from the date of receipt of this letter. , Ms. HEM LATA FAA & Under Secretary (Appointment)/FAA Address: Department of justice, jaisalmer house, New Delhi-llOOll Phone No.: 23382978 Yours faithfully ( ARUN KUMAR AGGARWAL) CPIO & SECTION OFFICER(APPOINTMENT)/CPIO Phone No.: 23383037 Email: [email protected] • .. ~'1iCf) : 12.11.2020 ~\1lr1~~ ~ ~ ~ +j~IC1<:{ , ~mOO, ~-fcM, ~ ~ ~ ~~-110001 ~:~ cnr ~ ~ ctr um 6 q 7 rf> ~ ~ ~ ~I. 1. \3i£!clli -;:x:rrmCf1<:l C# IiI'141 <:{ ~ $ ClRtidfll ~ ~ ~ ct>~ >If()ft1rq I 2.
    [Show full text]
  • For Judgement
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 26-08-2020 Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE:- BY : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA SUPPLEMENTARY LIST Petitioner/Respondent SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Advocate FOR JUDGEMENT 1501 T.P.(C) No. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1] 496-509/2020 XVI-A Versus AGRICAS LLP AND ORS. B. RAMANA MURTHY[R-15], ANISHA UPADHYAY[R-23], SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1], [R-8], [R-27], [R-28], SOMIRAN SHARMA[R-30], [R-31] RUCHI a KOHLI[IMPL] VIVEK JAIN[INT], SIDDHANT BUXY[INT], NITIN MISHRA[INT], K. R. SASIPRABHU[INT], GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI[R-11], [R-14], [INT] [ HEARD BY : HON'BLE A.M. KHANWILKAR ,HON'BLE DINESH MAHESHWARI AND HON'BLE SANJIV KHANNA, JJ. ] IA No. 53677/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 54886/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 54884/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 55288/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 56983/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 54687/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 55097/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 54459/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 26-08-2020 Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) IA No.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Chambers of Hon'ble the Chief Justice
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 08-07-2021 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN (TIME : 1:30 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 8154-2021 PRABHAKAR TUKARAM SHINDE IX Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. IN SLP(C) No. - 12291/2020, IA No. 69668/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION IA No. 43829/2021 - ORAL HEARING NEW DELHI 06-07-2021 15:34:48 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 08-07-2021 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI (TIME : 1:30 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 1518-2021 MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY XI Versus RATANPAL (DEAD) AND ORS. IN SLP(C) No. - 6025/2017, IA No. 8136/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION NEW DELHI 06-07-2021 15:35:09 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 08-07-2021 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY (TIME : 1:35 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1002 Diary No. 10215-2021 DR.
    [Show full text]