DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 14/Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 14/Wednesday, January 22, 2014 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules 3559 be purchased from the Commission’s channel 48 and removing channel 46 at www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, duplicating contractor, Best Copy and South Bend. enter the appropriate docket number Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street SW., [FR Doc. 2014–01175 Filed 1–21–14; 8:45 am] (see table, below). You may submit Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, BILLING CODE 6712–01–P information by clicking on ‘‘Comment telephone 1–800–478–3160 or via email Now!’’ If your information will fit in the www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this provided comment box, please use this document in accessible formats DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR feature of http://www.regulations.gov, as (computer diskettes, large print, audio it is most compatible with our recording, and Braille), send an email to Fish and Wildlife Service information review procedures. If you [email protected] or call the Commission’s attach your information as a separate Consumer and Governmental Affairs 50 CFR Part 17 document, our preferred file format is Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) Microsoft Word. If you attach multiple 418–0432 (TTY). This document does [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0121; FWS– comments (such as form letters), our not contain proposed information HQ–ES–2013–0122; FWS–HQ–ES–2013– preferred format is a spreadsheet in collection requirements subject to the 0123; FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0124; FWS–HQ– Microsoft Excel. ES–2013–0125: 450 003 0115] Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail Public Law 104–13. In addition, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife or hand-delivery to: Public Comments therefore, it does not contain any and Plants; 90-Day Findings on Five Processing, Attn: [Insert appropriate proposed information collection burden Petitions docket number; see table, below]; ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer Division of Policy and Directives than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of Interior. Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. ACTION: Notice of petition findings and 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203. 3506(c)(4). initiation of status reviews. We request that you send information Provisions of the Regulatory only by the methods described above. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to We will post all comments on http:// Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90- this proceeding. Members of the public www.regulations.gov. This generally day findings on five petitions to list 19 should note that from the time a Notice means that we will post any personal species as endangered or threatened, of Proposed Rule Making is issued until information you provide us (see Request under the Endangered Species Act of the matter is no longer subject to for Information). 1973, as amended (Act). Based on our Commission consideration or court review, we find that these petitions Species Docket No. review, all ex parte contacts (other than present substantial scientific or ex parte presentations exempt under 47 commercial information indicating that 15 foreign bats FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0121 CFR 1.1204(a)) are prohibited in the petitioned actions may be Emperor pen- FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0122 Commission proceedings, such as this warranted. Therefore, with the guin. one, which involve channel allotments. Flores hawk- FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0123 publication of this notice, we are See 47 CFR 1.1208 for rules governing eagle. initiating a review of the status of these restricted proceedings. Ridgway’s hawk FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0124 species to determine if the petitioned Virgin Islands FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0125 For information regarding proper actions are warranted. In order to assure coquı´. filing procedures for comments, see that the best scientific and commercial §§ 1.415 and 1.420. data informs the status review and, if FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 warranted, the subsequent listing Janine Van Norman, Chief, Branch of determinations, and to provide an Foreign Species, Ecological Services Television. opportunity for all interested parties to Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, provide information for consideration Federal Communications Commission. 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 420, for the status assessment, we are Barbara A. Kreisman, Arlington, VA 22203; telephone 703– requesting information regarding these 358–2171; facsimile 703–358–1735. If Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. species (see Request for Information you use a telecommunications device Proposed rules below). Based on the status reviews, we for the deaf (TDD), please call the will issue 12-month findings on the Federal Information Relay Service For the reasons discussed in the petitions, which will address whether (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. preamble, the Federal Communications the petitioned action is warranted, as SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act. part 73 as follows: DATES: To allow us adequate time to Request for Information conduct these status reviews, we request When we make a finding that a PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST that we receive information no later SERVICES petition presents substantial than March 24, 2014. Information information indicating that listing a submitted electronically using the species may be warranted, we are ■ 1. The authority citation for Part 73 Federal eRulemaking Portal (see required to promptly review the status continues to read as follows: ADDRESSES, below) must be received by of the species (status review). For the Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing status review to be complete and based and 339. date. on the best available scientific and ADDRESSES: You may submit commercial information, we request § 73.622 [Amended] information by one of the following information on these species from ■ 2. Section 73.622(i), the Post- methods: governmental agencies, Native Transition Table of DTV Allotments (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal American tribes, the scientific under Indiana is amended by adding eRulemaking Portal: http:// community, industry, and any other VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:37 Jan 21, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM 22JAP1 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 3560 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules interested parties. We seek information allow us to verify any scientific or the measure proposed in the petition on: commercial information you include. may be warranted’’ (50 CFR 424.14(b)). (1) The species’ biology, range, and Submissions merely stating support If we find that substantial scientific or population trends, including: for or opposition to the actions under commercial information was presented, (a) Habitat requirements; consideration without providing we are required to commence a review (b) Genetics and taxonomy; supporting information, although noted, of the status of the species, which will (c) Historical and current range, will not be considered in making a be subsequently summarized in our 12- including distribution patterns; determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the month finding. (d) Historical and current population Act directs that determinations as to levels, and current and projected trends; whether any species is an endangered or Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and threatened species must be made and its implementing regulations at 50 (e) Past and ongoing conservation ‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific CFR part 424 set forth the procedures measures for the species, its habitat, or and commercial data available.’’ for adding a species to, or removing a both. You may submit your information species from, the Federal Lists of (2) The factors that are the basis for concerning these status reviews by one Endangered and Threatened Wildlife making a listing determination for a of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES and Plants. A species may be species under section 4(a)(1) of the Act section. If you submit information via determined to be an endangered or (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are: http://www.regulations.gov, your entire threatened species due to one or more (a) The present or threatened submission—including any personal of the five factors described in section destruction, modification, or identifying information—will be posted 4(a)(1) of the Act (see Request for curtailment of its habitat or range on the Web site. If you submit a Information). (‘‘Factor A’’); hardcopy that includes personal In considering what factors might (b) Overutilization for commercial, identifying information, you may constitute threats, we must look beyond recreational, scientific, or educational request at the top of your document that the exposure of the species to a factor purposes (‘‘Factor B’’); we withhold this personal identifying to evaluate whether the species may (c) Disease or predation (‘‘Factor C’’); information from public review. respond to the factor in a way that (d) The inadequacy of existing However, we cannot guarantee that we causes actual impacts to the species. If regulatory mechanisms (‘‘Factor D’’); or will be able to do so. We will post all there is exposure to a factor and the (e) Other natural or manmade factors hardcopy submissions on http:// species responds negatively, the factor affecting its continued existence www.regulations.gov. may be a threat and, during the status (‘‘Factor E’’). Information and supporting review, we attempt to determine how (3) The potential effects of climate documentation that we received and significant a threat it is. The threat is change on these species or their used in preparing this finding will be significant if it drives, or contributes to, habitats.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphometrical Variations of Malaysian Hipposideros Species
    Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences 6(1): 47-57 (2012) Morphometrical Variations of Malaysian Hipposideros Species Siti Nurlydia Sazali, Charlie J. Laman and M.T. Abdullah Department of Zoology, Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A study on the morphometrical variations among four Malaysian Hipposideros species was conducted using voucher specimens deposited in Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) Zoological Museum and the Department of Widlife and National Park (DWNP) Kuala Lumpur. Twenty two individuals from four species of Hipposideros ater , H. bicolor , H. cineraceus and H. dyacorum were morphologically measured, in which a total of 27 linear parameters of body, skull and dentals of each were appropriately recorded. The statistical data were later subjected to discriminant function analysis (DFA) and canonical variate analysis (CVA) using SPSS version 15.0 and unweighted pair-group method average (UPGMA) cluster analysis using Minitab version 14.4. The highest character loadings observed in Function l, Function 2 and Function 3 were the forearm length (FA), the third digit second phalanx length (D3P2L) and the palatal length (PL) with standardised canonical discriminant function coefficient values of 21.910, 5.770 and 5.095, respectively. These three characters were identified as the best diagnostic features for discriminating these closely related species of Hipposideros . Hence, this morphometric approach could be a promising tool as an alternative to the molecular DNA analysis for identification of Chiroptera species. Keywords: Hipposideros , morphometric, discriminant function analysis cluster analysis, species identification. 1. INTRODUCTION Bats belong to the order Chiroptera and can be distinguished from all other mammals by their ability to fly, which is a result of the modification of their forelimbs into wings (Payne et al .
    [Show full text]
  • Keshav Ravi by Keshav Ravi
    by Keshav Ravi by Keshav Ravi Preface About the Author In the whole world, there are more than 30,000 species Keshav Ravi is a caring and compassionate third grader threatened with extinction today. One prominent way to who has been fascinated by nature throughout his raise awareness as to the plight of these animals is, of childhood. Keshav is a prolific reader and writer of course, education. nonfiction and is always eager to share what he has learned with others. I have always been interested in wildlife, from extinct dinosaurs to the lemurs of Madagascar. At my ninth Outside of his family, Keshav is thrilled to have birthday, one personal writing project I had going was on the support of invested animal advocates, such as endangered wildlife, and I had chosen to focus on India, Carole Hyde and Leonor Delgado, at the Palo Alto the country where I had spent a few summers, away from Humane Society. my home in California. Keshav also wishes to thank Ernest P. Walker’s Just as I began to explore the International Union for encyclopedia (Walker et al. 1975) Mammals of the World Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List species for for inspiration and the many Indian wildlife scientists India, I realized quickly that the severity of threat to a and photographers whose efforts have made this variety of species was immense. It was humbling to then work possible. realize that I would have to narrow my focus further down to a subset of species—and that brought me to this book on the Endangered Mammals of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctz78-02 (02) Lee Et Al.Indd 51 14 08 2009 13:12 52 Lee Et Al
    Contributions to Zoology, 78 (2) 51-64 (2009) Variation in the nocturnal foraging distribution of and resource use by endangered Ryukyu flying foxes(Pteropus dasymallus) on Iriomotejima Island, Japan Ya-Fu Lee1, 4, Tokushiro Takaso2, 5, Tzen-Yuh Chiang1, 6, Yen-Min Kuo1, 7, Nozomi Nakanishi2, 8, Hsy-Yu Tzeng3, 9, Keiko Yasuda2 1 Department of Life Sciences and Institute of Biodiversity, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan 2 The Iriomote Project, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, 671 Iriomote, Takatomi-cho, Okinawa 907- 1542, Japan 3 Hengchun Research Center, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Pingtung 946, Taiwan 4 E-mail: [email protected] 5 E-mail: [email protected] 6 E-mail: [email protected] 7 E-mail: [email protected] 8 E-mail: [email protected] 9 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: abundance, bats, Chiroptera, diet, figs, frugivores, habitat Abstract Contents The nocturnal distribution and resource use by Ryukyu flying foxes Introduction ........................................................................................ 51 was studied along 28 transects, covering five types of habitats, on Material and methods ........................................................................ 53 Iriomote Island, Japan, from early June to late September, 2005. Study sites ..................................................................................... 53 Bats were mostly encountered solitarily (66.8%) or in pairs (16.8%), Bat and habitat census ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hipposideros Vittatus – Striped Leaf-Nosed Bat
    Hipposideros vittatus – Striped leaf-nosed Bat Assessment Rationale The species is only known from the northern part of the assessment region (extent of occurrence estimated at 1,419 km2), where it occurs in Pafuri, Kruger National Park. Although it qualifies for Vulnerable D2 based on limited number of locations, there are no plausible threats. While no information exists on population size in the assessment region, it is numerous outside South Africa. Thus we assume the population is fairly large and stable in Kruger National Park. We list this species as Least Concern. Regional population effects: The subpopulations that occur in northern Kruger National Park are part of a population that is continuous across the border occurring throughout most of Zimbabwe and Mozambique. The Melissa Donnelly, iNaturalist species overall is widespread in the rest of Africa. Striped Leaf-nosed Bats have a high wing-loading (Norberg & Rayner 1987), and presumably good dispersal potential, Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern and thus rescue effects are possible. National Red List status (2004) Not Evaluated Reasons for change Non-genuine change: Distribution New information Although fairly sparse within its distribution, this species Global Red List status (2008) Near Threatened A ranges through much of southern, Central and East Africa. The northeastern extent of its range extends from Ethiopia TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None and Somalia to Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia and CITES listing None Mozambique. It has a patchy distribution through Central Africa in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Central Endemic No African Republic, Angola, and spreads westwards to Nigeria and Guinea. The southern portion of its Sexual dimorphism is evident in this species; distribution includes Zimbabwe, Botswana, Namibia and apart from the differences in colouring, females the extreme northeastern regions of South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Taiwan and Adjacent China
    Zootaxa 3920 (1): 301–342 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3920.2.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B991675-0C48-40D4-87D2-DACA524D17C2 Molecular phylogeny and morphological revision of Myotis bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Taiwan and adjacent China MANUEL RUEDI1,5, GÁBOR CSORBA2, LIANG- KONG LIN3 & CHENG-HAN CHOU3,4 1Department of Mammalogy and Ornithology, Natural History Museum of Geneva, Route de Malagnou 1, BP 6434, 1211 Geneva (6), Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Baross u. 13., H-1088. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of Wildlife Ecology, Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan 407, R.O.C. E-mail: [email protected] 4Division of Zoology, Endemic Species Research Institute, Nantou, Taiwan 552, R.O.C. E-mail: [email protected] 5Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 301 Introduction . 302 Material and methods . 310 Results . 314 Discussion . 319 Systematic account . 319 Submyotodon latirostris (Kishida, 1932) . 319 Myotis fimbriatus (Peters, 1870) . 321 Myotis laniger (Peters, 1870) . 322 Myotis secundus sp. n. 324 Myotis soror sp. n. 327 Myotis frater Allen, 1923 . 331 Myotis formosus (Hodgson, 1835) . 334 Myotis rufoniger (Tomes, 1858) . 335 Biogeography and conclusions . 336 Key to the Myotinae from Taiwan and adjacent mainland China . 337 Acknowledgments . 337 References . 338 Abstract In taxonomic accounts, three species of Myotis have been traditionally reported to occur on the island of Taiwan: Watase’s bat (M.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union
    Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union 2018 – 2024 October 2018 Action Plan for the Conservation of All Bat Species in the European Union 2018 - 2024 EDITORS: BAROVA Sylvia (European Commission) & STREIT Andreas (UNEP/EUROBATS) COMPILERS: MARCHAIS Guillaume & THAURONT Marc (Ecosphère, France/The N2K Group) CONTRIBUTORS (in alphabetical order): BOYAN Petrov * (Bat Research & Conservation Centre, Bulgaria) DEKKER Jasja (Animal ecologist, Netherlands) ECOSPHERE: JUNG Lise, LOUTFI Emilie, NUNINGER Lise & ROUÉ Sébastien GAZARYAN Suren (EUROBATS) HAMIDOVIĆ Daniela (State Institute for Nature Protection, Croatia) JUSTE Javier (Spanish association for the study and conservation of bats, Spain) KADLEČÍK Ján (Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky, Slovakia) KYHERÖINEN Eeva-Maria (Finnish Museum of Natural History, Finland) HANMER Julia (Bat Conservation Trust, United Kingdom) LEIVITS Meelis (Environmental Agency of the Ministry of Environment, Estonia) MARNELl Ferdia (National Parks & Wildlife Service, Ireland) PETERMANN Ruth (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany) PETERSONS Gunărs (Latvia University of Agriculture, Latvia) PRESETNIK Primož (Centre for Cartography of Fauna and Flora, Slovenia) RAINHO Ana (Institute for the Nature and Forest Conservation, Portugal) REITER Guido (Foundation for the protection of our bats in Switzerland) RODRIGUES Luisa (Institute for the Nature and Forest Conservation, Portugal) RUSSO Danilo (University of Napoli Frederico II, Italy) SCHEMBRI
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Host Specialization, and Geographic Structure of Filarial Nematodes Infecting Malagasy Bats
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Diversity, Host Specialization, and Geographic Structure of Filarial Nematodes Infecting Malagasy Bats Beza Ramasindrazana1,2,3*, Koussay Dellagi1,2, Erwan Lagadec1,2, Milijaona Randrianarivelojosia4, Steven M. Goodman3,5, Pablo Tortosa1,2 1 Centre de Recherche et de Veille sur les maladies émergentes dans l’Océan Indien, Plateforme de Recherche CYROI, Sainte Clotilde, La Réunion, France, 2 Université de La Réunion, UMR PIMIT "Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical", INSERM U 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249. Plateforme de Recherche CYROI, 97490 Sainte Clotilde, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France, 3 Association Vahatra, Antananarivo, Madagascar, 4 Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar, 5 The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Abstract Citation: Ramasindrazana B, Dellagi K, Lagadec E, We investigated filarial infection in Malagasy bats to gain insights into the diversity of these Randrianarivelojosia M, Goodman SM, Tortosa P (2016) Diversity, Host Specialization, and Geographic parasites and explore the factors shaping their distribution. Samples were obtained from Structure of Filarial Nematodes Infecting Malagasy 947 individual bats collected from 52 sites on Madagascar and representing 31 of the 44 Bats. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0145709. doi:10.1371/ species currently recognized on the island. Samples were screened for the presence of journal.pone.0145709 micro- and macro-parasites through both molecular and morphological approaches. Phylo- Editor: Karen E. Samonds, Northern Illinois genetic analyses showed that filarial diversity in Malagasy bats formed three main groups, University, UNITED STATES the most common represented by Litomosa spp. infecting Miniopterus spp. (Miniopteridae); Received: April 30, 2015 a second group infecting Pipistrellus cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Bats (Chiroptera) from the Albertine Rift, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, with the Description of Two New Species of the Rhinolophus Maclaudi Group
    Bonn zoological Bulletin 62 (2): 186 –202 December 2013 Bats (Chiroptera) from the Albertine Rift, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, with the description of two new species of the Rhinolophus maclaudi group Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans 1,2 , Jakob Fahr 3, Michael H. Huhndorf 2, Prince Kaleme 4,5 , Andrew J. Plumptre 6, Ben D. Marks 2 & Robert Kizungu 5 1 College of Professional Studies, Roosevelt University, 430 S. Michigan Ave., Chicago, IL, 60605, USA 2 Science and Education, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605-2496, USA, E-mail: [email protected] 3 Division of Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, TU Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 4, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany 4 Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag XI, Matieland, South Africa 5 Centre de Recherche des Sciences Naturelles, Lwiro, Democratic Republic of Congo 6 Wildlife Conservation Society , Plot 802 Kiwafu Rd, Kansanga, PO Box 7487, Kampala, Uganda Abstract . Horseshoe bats of the Rhinolophus maclaudi species group were recently revised by Fahr et al. (2002). Known members of the group are located in the mountainous region of West Africa and the Albertine Rift, east of the Congo River basin with a major gap (4300 km) between the two recognized sub-groups. Here we describe two additional species within this species group from the Albertine Rift center of endemism in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. One derives from the Misotschi-Kabogo highlands, a heretofore poorly documented region half-way down the western shore of Lake Tanganyika. Additional bat records from this locality are also documented. The second new taxon was collect - ed in Kahuzi-Biega National Park, a World Heritage Site adjacent to the shore of Lake Kivu.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Program for the Bonin Flying Fox (Pteropus Pselaphon) I
    Annex 2 Conservation Program for the Bonin flying fox (Pteropus pselaphon) Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Ministry of the Environment I. Purpose of the program The Bonin flying fox (Pteropus pselaphon), which belongs to the family Pteropodidae, is the only mammal endemic to the Ogasawara Islands. It is a herbivore that mainly forages on fruits. As a large seed disperser and pollinator, the Bonin flying fox is a crucial member of the ecosystems of the oceanic islands that make up Ogasawara. At present, its occurrence has been confirmed only on Chichijima, Hahajima and the Kazan Island Group. Its population in all of the Ogasawara Islands is estimated to be about 300 individuals at most. In the past, several hundred individuals were confirmed on Hahajima, which is part of the Ogasawara Archipelago, but the population had rapidly plummeted to a very small number by the 1970s. At present the total abundance is expected to be about 130, most of which occur on Chichijima. Hence, they are deemed in serious danger of extinction in the near future. In winter on Chichijima, Bonin flying foxes exhibit behavior not seen in other flying foxes, such as forming clusters in a colonial roost during the day in which individuals rest huddled together, and this is likely to be related to the development of a distinctive society. Currently, the Ogiura area on Chichiijma is the only confirmed winter roosting site. In winter, this roost is used by almost all individuals on Chichijima and is thought to be closely linked to breeding behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Minotaur's Labyrinth Phylogeny of the Bat Family Hipposideridae WIESLAW BOGDANOWICZ and ROBERT D
    Pp. 27-42, In Bat Biology and Conservation (T.H. Kunz and P.A. Racey, eds.). 1998. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. - 2 In the Minotaur's Labyrinth Phylogeny of the Bat Family Hipposideridae WIESLAW BOGDANOWICZ AND ROBERT D. OWEN The family Hipposideridae is composed of nine Recent view or have made only minor changes to his 1963 dassi- genera with about 65 species, which are widespread fication. However, the question arises as to what extent throughout warm areas of the Old World from western Hill's carefully arranged, but nevertheless intuitive, species Africa east to the New Hebrides hdextend only marginally groups reflect phylogenetic history into the Palaearaic (Corbet and Hill 1991, 1992; Koopman More importantly, none of the previous studies evalu- 1994). The genus Hipposideros has about 50 speaes; the ated phylogenetic affinities within the entire family The other genera either are monotypic (Anthops, Cloeotis, Para- aim of our chapter is to fill this gap, although the lack of coelops, Rhinonycteris) or have 2 species (Aselliu, Asellism, well-preserved materials for some taxa makes our analysis Coelops, Triaenops). Hipposiderid fossils are known from the incomplete. Nevertheless, it is a first step toward a compre- middle Eocene of Europe (Sigk and Legendre 1983; Sigk hensive revision of phylogenetic relationships among hip- 1991), the early Oligocene of Arabo-Africa (Sigk et al. 1994), posiderids. We also evaluated different hypotheses concern- the late Oligocene of Australia (Archer et al. 1994), and ing the geographic center of origin for the family and the probably the Miocene of Asia (K. E Koopman, in litt.).
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary and Slovakia, 2017
    HUNGARY and SLOVAKIA SMALL MAMMAL TOUR - The Bats and Rodents of Central Europe Hangarian hay meadow in warm August sunshine. Steve Morgan ([email protected]), John Smart 25/8/17 HUNGARY and SLOVAKIA SMALL MAMMAL TOUR 1 Introduction I had long intended to visit Hungary for bats and small mammals but had never quite got round to it. Now, however, a chance presented itself to join a tour with both Hungary and Slovakia on the itinerary and a long list of prospective mammalian targets on offer, including Forest Dormouse, European Hamster, Lesser Mole Rat, Common Souslik and a number of highly desirable bats such as Grey Long-eared, Northern and Parti-coloured. The tour was organised by Ecotours of Hungary and led by Istvan Bartol. It ran from 9/8/17 to 17/8/17, the two particpants being John Smart and me, both of us from the UK. 2 Logistics I flew from Luton to Budapest on Wizzair. Frankly, I’d never heard of Wizzair before and, given their two hour delay on the outward leg (resulting in an extremely late check in to my hotel in Budapest), I’m not sure I want to hear about them again! The hotels selected by Ecotours were all very good. In Mezokovesd we stayed at the Hajnal Hotel which was clean and comfortable and offered a good (cooked) buffet breakfast. In Slovakia we stayed at the equally good Penzion Reva which was set in very nice countryside overlooking a picturesque lake. Istvan Bartol led the tour and did all the driving.
    [Show full text]