Possible Toxic Effects from Nuclear Reprocessing Plants at Sellafield

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Possible Toxic Effects from Nuclear Reprocessing Plants at Sellafield Stichting Laka: Documentatie- en onderzoekscentrum kernenergie De Laka-bibliotheek The Laka-library Dit is een pdf van één van de publicaties in This is a PDF from one of the publications de bibliotheek van Stichting Laka, het in from the library of the Laka Foundation; the Amsterdam gevestigde documentatie- en Amsterdam-based documentation and onderzoekscentrum kernenergie. research centre on nuclear energy. Laka heeft een bibliotheek met ongeveer The Laka library consists of about 8,000 8000 boeken (waarvan een gedeelte dus ook books (of which a part is available as PDF), als pdf), duizenden kranten- en tijdschriften- thousands of newspaper clippings, hundreds artikelen, honderden tijdschriftentitels, of magazines, posters, video's and other posters, video’s en ander beeldmateriaal. material. Laka digitaliseert (oude) tijdschriften en Laka digitizes books and magazines from the boeken uit de internationale antikernenergie- international movement against nuclear beweging. power. De catalogus van de Laka-bibliotheek staat The catalogue of the Laka-library can be op onze site. De collectie bevat een grote found at our website. The collection also verzameling gedigitaliseerde tijdschriften uit contains a large number of digitized de Nederlandse antikernenergie-beweging en magazines from the Dutch anti-nuclear power een verzameling video's. movement and a video-section. Laka speelt met oa. haar informatie- Laka plays with, amongst others things, its voorziening een belangrijke rol in de information services, an important role in the Nederlandse anti-kernenergiebeweging. Dutch anti-nuclear movement. Appreciate our work? Feel free to make a small donation. Thank you. www.laka.org | [email protected] | Ketelhuisplein 43, 1054 RD Amsterdam | 020-6168294 STOA Scientific and Technological Options Assessment POSSIBLE TOXIC EFFECTS FROM THE NUCLEAR REPROCESSING PLANTS AT SELLAFIELD (UK) AND CAP DE LA HAGUE (FRANCE) A first contribution to the scientific debate 1.) Introduction: Letter to the reader by the Chairman of the STOA Panel on the decision taken by the Panel on 23 October 2001 2.) Study by WISE - Paris 3.) Evaluation reports by experts Luxembourg, November 2001 Directorate General for Research EN EN Title: POSSIBLE TOXIC EFFECTS FROM THE NUCLEAR REPROCESSING PLANTS AT SELLAFIELD AND CAP DE LA HAGUE Workplan Ref.: EP/IV/A/STOA/2000/17/01 Publisher: European Parliament Directorate General for Research Directorate A The STOA Programme Authors: WISE - Paris, Study director: Schneider, M., Study team: Coeytaux, X., Faïd, Y.B., Marignac, Y., Rouy, E., Thompson, G. (IRSS, Cambridge, USA) Fairlie, I., Lowry, D., Sumner, D. (Independent consultants) Editor: STOA Unit Date: November 2001 PE number: PE 303.110 This document is a working Document for the 'STOA Panel'. It is not an official publication of STOA. This document does not necessarily represent the views of the European Parliament POSSIBLE TOXIC EFFECTS FROM THE NUCLEAR REPROCESSING PLANTS AT SELLAFIELD AND CAP DE LA HAGUE PE 303.110 4 POSSIBLE TOXIC EFFECTS FROM THE NUCLEAR REPROCESSING PLANTS AT SELLAFIELD AND CAP DE LA HAGUE 1. LETTER TO THE READER....................................................................................................3 2. STUDY BY WISE-PARIS ............................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND GENERAL CONCLUSIONS.....................................................................9 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Reprocessing Status and Issues ......................................................................................................... 9 3. International and European Legal Framework ................................................................................... 9 4. Risk Assessment of Radioactive Releases ....................................................................................... 10 5. Case Study Sellafield ...................................................................................................................... 11 6. Case Study La Hague...................................................................................................................... 13 7. Comparative and Cumulative Analysis............................................................................................ 15 8. Alternative Options......................................................................................................................... 15 General Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 16 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................17 1.1. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY .................................................................................................................. 17 1.2. BACKGROUND AND CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................... 18 2. REPROCESSING STATUS AND ISSUES.......................................................................................19 2.1. NUCLEAR REPROCESSING ................................................................................................................... 19 2.2. ORIGINS OF REPROCESSING ................................................................................................................ 19 2.3. IMPLICATIONS OF REPROCESSING ....................................................................................................... 20 3. INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK.........................................................21 3.1. INTERNATIONAL LEGISLATION AND TREATIES .................................................................................... 21 3.1.1. Major International Bodies........................................................................................................ 21 3.1.2. Major International Conventions............................................................................................... 21 3.1.3. The European Legal Framework And Its Implementation.......................................................... 22 3.1.3.1. Euratom Treaty 22 3.2. MARINE POLLUTION - APPLICATION OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE ........................................... 26 4. RISK ASSESSMENT OF RADIOACTIVE RELEASES.....................................................................28 4.1. RELEASES FROM REPROCESSING......................................................................................................... 28 4.2. COLLECTIVE DOSES............................................................................................................................ 28 4.2.1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 28 4.2.2. Theoretical Justification............................................................................................................ 28 4.2.3. Global Collective Doses............................................................................................................ 29 4.2.4. Important Radionuclides in Reprocessing Releases ................................................................... 29 4.2.4.1. Carbon-14 (14C) 29 4.2.4.2. Krypton-85 (85Kr) 29 4.2.4.3. Iodine-129 (129I) 29 4.2.4.4. Tritium (3H) 30 4.2.4.5. Technetium-99 (99Tc) 30 4.3. UNCERTAINTIES IN RISK ASSESSMENT................................................................................................ 31 5. CASE STUDY SELLAFIELD ......................................................................................................33 5.1. NATIONAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................. 33 5.2. OPERATIONS AT SELLAFIELD .............................................................................................................. 33 5.3. RELEASES FROM SELLAFIELD ............................................................................................................. 34 5.3.1. Air Emissions ........................................................................................................................... 34 5.3.2. Liquid Discharges..................................................................................................................... 35 5.3.3. Technetium Discharges............................................................................................................. 37 5.3.4. Expected Future Sellafield Discharges ...................................................................................... 37 5.4. IMPACT OF SELLAFIELD DISCHARGES ................................................................................................. 39 5.4.1. Plutonium and other actinides near Sellafield ............................................................................ 39 5.4.2. Estimated Doses from Consumption of Irish Sea Fish and Shellfish .......................................... 40 5 PE 303.110 POSSIBLE TOXIC EFFECTS FROM THE NUCLEAR REPROCESSING PLANTS AT SELLAFIELD AND CAP DE LA HAGUE 5.4.3. Doses to Critical Groups........................................................................................................... 40 5.4.4. Environmental Concentrations .................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ireland the Future of Europe Synopsis Nuala Ahern
    Labour was usually in Government in coalition with Fine The Future of EuropeEurope:: Perspectives Gael. from Ireland Ireland has been independent from the United Kingdom since 1922 and a Republic since 1949. Ireland was in a currency union with the UK until 1979. For a period of 30 years from 1969 until 1998 there was instability in Is there room for a European Northern Ireland which successive Irish Governments dream in a country captivated in worked to resolve and contain. EU entry in 1972 was the structures of IMF -EU backed by both centre right parties and opposed by adjustment programmes? Is more Labour, which however soon became converted to the European integration desired and European project. Sinn Fein and the small socialist feasible at all? parties are anti - Globalisation and anti EU. The Irish Greens formerly had an influential Eurosceptic wing which is decreasing and many young greens are pro EU. These were among the key questions addressed Most Unions and business organisations are Pro EU. during a seminar on the future of Europe, organised by Green European Foundation with the support of Impact of the financial and economic crisis on the Heinrich Boll Foundation and Green Foundation Ireland Ireland on November 17th in Dublin. This article is a synopsis of the seminar, written by Nuala Ahern, Ireland had a booming economy and massive growth in Chair of the Green Foundation Ireland and former the 1990’s.This turned into a housing bubble, fuelled by Green MEP. low Eurozone interest rates and a global market saturated with liquidity. A comprehensive analysis of how the Irish economy collapsed is contained in the Nyberg Report , an independent report by a Norwegian The seminar took place in Tailors’ Hall, the headquarters economist.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union
    Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union By Brian Harvey This document was commissioned by the Equality Authority and the views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Equality Authority. Preface The European Union has played a valuable role in stimulating and shaping equality strategies in Ireland over the past three decades.The majority of key equality initiatives in Ireland can trace their origins to European Union directives, European case law or European Union action programmes. This influence continues to the present moment. However, innovation and ambition in our new equality legislation – the Employment Equality Act, 1998 and the Equal Status Act, 2000 – and our related equality institutions have changed this situation to one of mutual influencing. Europe now looks to the Irish experience of implementing a multi- ground equality agenda for learning. This publication provides an introductory briefing on approaches to equality at the level of the European Union – focusing on policy, institutions and funding programmes. It seeks to resource those who are engaging with the challenge to shape European Union policy and programmes in relation to equality. It aims to assist those addressing the impact of European Union policy and programmes on Ireland or to draw benefit from this influence. It is a unique document in bringing an integrated nine-ground equality focus to policy and programmes at European Union level.We are grateful to Brian Harvey for this work in drawing all this material together in this format.We are also grateful to Jenny Bulbulia B.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Pursuant to the OSPAR Convention (Ireland – United Kingdom)
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Proceedings pursuant to the OSPAR Convention (Ireland – United Kingdom) 2 July 2003 VOLUME XXIII pp. 59-151 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2006 PART II Dispute Concerning Access to Information Under Article 9 of the OSPAR Convention between Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Final Award Decision of 2 July 2003 Différend opposant l'Irlande au Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord concernant l'accès à l'information prévu par l'article 9 de la Convention pour la protection du milieu marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est (Convention OSPAR), Sentence définitive Décision du 2 juillet 2003 DISPUTE CONCERNING ACCESS TO INFORMATION UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE OSPAR CONVENTION BETWEEN IRELAND AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, FINAL AWARD, DECISION OF 2 JULY 2003 DIFFÉREND OPPOSANT L'IRLANDE AU ROYAUME-UNI DE GRANDE-BRETAGNE ET D'IRLANDE DU NORD CONCERNANT L'ACCÈS À L'INFORMATION PRÉVU PAR L'ARTICLE 9 DE LA CONVENTION POUR LA PROTECTION DU MILIEU MARIN DE L'ATLANTIQUE DU NORD-EST (CONVENTION OSPAR), SENTENCE DÉFINITIVE, DÉCISION DU 2 JUILLET 2003 Tribunal constituted pursuant to the 1992 Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic ("the OSPAR Convention"). Applicable Law: The "rules of international law" to be applied by such a Tribunal include the OSPAR Convention as well as customary international law and general principles unless and to the extent that the Parties have created a lex specialis not inconsistent with a relevant jus cogens.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Session document FINAL A5-0444/2002 9 December 2002 REPORT on the Commission White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – C5-0658/2001 – 2001/2281(COS)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Juan de Dios Izquierdo Collado RR\484385EN.doc PE 301.855 EN EN PE 301.855 2/31 RR\484385EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY........................................................................................................................ 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 26 RR\484385EN.doc 3/31 PE 301.855 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 14 September 2001 the Commission forwarded to Parliament its White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – 2001/2281(COS)). At the sitting of 13 December 2001 the President of Parliament announced that she had referred the White Paper to the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism as the committee
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2021 Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas Vaida Lilionyte Manthos West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Manthos, Vaida Lilionyte, "Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas" (2021). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 8290. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/8290 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas Vaida Lilionyte Manthos Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Science at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science John Kilwein, Ph.D., Chair Shauna Fisher, Ph.D. Erik S. Herron, Ph.D. Daniel Renfrew, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Llamamiento Mundial De Los Parlamentarios a Favor De La Tasa Tobin Appel Mondial Des Parlementaires Pour La Taxe Tobin Parliamen
    Parliamentarian World Call for the 'Tobin Tax' The campaign for a 'Tobin Tax' continues... 864 parliamentarians from 33 coun- However, despite the good intentions agenda. Globalisation creates wealth, tries have signed the Parliamentarian of these declarations of, no new but also a great deal of inequality. A World Call for the 'Tobin Tax'. mechanism of financing was put in 'Tobin Tax' could be the first tax of this place to reverse the decrease in public new type, leading to others of this kind Last year, following the Earth fund budgets going to development such as a tax on maritime activity. Summit in Johannesburg and the aid and to pay for universal access to International Conference on all global public goods. We invite you to continue to spread Financing for Development in the word about this appeal and to col- Monterrey, the international commu- It has never been so urgent to create a lect signatures. nity confirmed that it is imperative to more equal world, a world where find the necessary funding to guaran- poverty is not the only future for tee universal access to all the essen- millions of human beings. Peace and Harlem Désir, Glyn Ford, tial elements of a decent quality of stability in the world are also at stake. Carlos Carnero life, the ability to nourish oneself pro- "Capital Taxes, Fiscal Systems and Globalisation" perly, access to drinking water, to This is why the question of a global Intergroup of the European Parliament education, and to medicines..... solidarity tax remains at the top of the Appel mondial des parlementaires pour la taxe Tobin Le combat pour la taxe Tobin se poursuit… 864 parlementaires de 33 pays, ont signé Mais, malgré les déclarations d’inten- pour lutter contre la spéculation et les l’Appel mondial des parlementaires tions, aucun mécanisme nouveau de paradis fiscaux.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Hrequena\Desktop\OSPAR
    PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION DISPUTE CONCERNING ACCESS TO INFORMATION UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE OSPAR CONVENTION IRELAND VERSUS UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND FINAL AWARD The Hague, 2 July 2003 DISPUTE CONCERNING ACCESS TO INFORMATION UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE OSPAR CONVENTION IRELAND VERSUS UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND FINAL AWARD TRIBUNAL: Professor W. Michael Reisman, Chairman Dr. Gavan Griffith QC Lord Mustill Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................................... 1 II. The OSPAR Convention .......................................... 1 III. Factual Background .............................................. 9 IV. The Claims and Submissions of the Parties and Questions Raised for Determination by the Tribunal .............................. 19 V. Procedural History.............................................. 21 VI. The Tribunal’s Findings .......................................... 27 VII. Applicable Law ................................................ 27 1. Interpretation............................................... 28 2. The Sintra Ministerial Statement ............................... 30 3. “Applicable International Regulations” .......................... 32 VIII. Findings with Respect to Article 9(1) ............................... 35 1. The Parties’ Arguments ...................................... 35 2. The Tribunal’s Decision with Respect to Jurisdiction Under Article 9(1)........................................ 39 IX. Findings with Respect to Article 9(2)..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Da´Il E´Ireann
    Vol. 651 Wednesday, No. 3 9 April 2008 DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DA´ IL E´ IREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Wednesday, 9 April 2008. Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 531 Ceisteanna—Questions Taoiseach ………………………………… 538 Death of Former Member: Expressions of Sympathy ………………… 547 Requests to move Adjournment of Da´il under Standing Order 32 ……………… 555 Order of Business ……………………………… 555 European Council Meeting: Statements ……………………… 563 Ceisteanna—Questions (resumed) Minister for Education and Science Priority Questions …………………………… 575 Other Questions …………………………… 586 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 600 An Bille um an Ochtu´ Leasu´ is Fiche ar an mBunreacht 2008: An Dara Ce´im (Ato´ ga´il) … … … 601 Twenty-Eighth Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2008: Second Stage (resumed) ……… 601 Message from Seanad ……………………………… 640 Private Members’ Business Cluster Munitions Bill 2008: Second Stage (resumed) ………………… 640 Adjournment Debate Hospitals Building Programme ………………………… 661 Schools Building Projects …………………………… 663 Crime Prevention ……………………………… 665 Traveller Accommodation ………………………… 668 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 671 DA´ IL E´ IREANN ———— De´ Ce´adaoin, 9 Aibrea´n 2008. Wednesday, 9 April 2008. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 10.30 a.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Leaders’ Questions. Deputy Enda Kenny: I was struck by a statement of the late Martin Luther King Jr., who was buried on this date. He said: “Our lives begin to end once we become silent about things that matter”. The Taoiseach will be reflecting on his years as Taoiseach and head of the country in the next period and he must look back on how we as a nation have treated our elderly. A number of years ago Deputy O’Dowd exposed a number of scandals in the area of care of the elderly.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalised Consensus in Europe's Parliament
    Institutionalised Consensus in Europe’s Parliament Giacomo Giorgio Edward Benedetto College: London School of Economics and Political Science Thesis for the University of London Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government 1 Abstract Embedded consensus has characterised the behaviour of the European Parliament since its foundation in the 1950s. This research tests the path dependence of consensus during the period of 1994 to 2002, in the light of the changing institutional powers of the Parliament. It challenges existing theory and empirical evidence drawn mainly from roll call votes that has concluded that the European Parliament has become more competitive internally in response to increased institutional powers. There are three causal factors that reinforce consensus: the need to reconcile national and ideological divisions within a multinational political system; the pull of external institutional factors such as institutional change or the separation of powers; and internal incentives for collusion between political actors influenced by the need to accommodate the interests of the national elites present at the level of the European Union. Switzerland, a multiple cleavage system of decentralised federalism that includes consociational characteristics and a separation of powers, provides a comparative reference point for institutionalised consensus. The hypotheses of institutionalised consensus are tested empirically in four ways: 1) by roll call votes between 1994 and 2001, focusing on procedure, policy area, and the cut-off point of the 1999 elections; 2) competition and consensus in the distribution of policy-related office in the Parliament; 3) by Parliament’s use of its powers of appointment and censure over other institutions; and 4) by the internal consensus on the preparation of Parliament’s bids for greater powers when the European Union Treaties are reformed.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 G G G Session document FINAL A5-0133/2003 28 April 2003 REPORT on the Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development (COM(2002) 347 - 2002/2261(INI)) Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Rapporteur: Philip Bushill-Matthews RR\316408EN.doc PE 316.408 EN EN PE 316.408 2/27 RR\316408EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 12 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY ........................................................................................................................ 13 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION.............. 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES................................................................................................................... 25 RR\316408EN.doc 3/27 PE 316.408 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 2 July 2002 the Commission forwarded to Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • 72 Seanad E´ Ireann 1109
    72 SEANAD E´ IREANN 1109 De´ Luain, 24 Samhain, 2003 Monday, 24th November, 2003 1.45 p.m. RIAR NA hOIBRE Order Paper GNO´ POIBLI´ Public Business 1. (l) An Bille um Bord Measu´ naithe Dı´obha´lacha Pearsanta 2003 — An Coiste. (a) Personal Injuries Assessment Board Bill 2003 — Committee Stage. —Senator Mary O’Rourke. 2. Go gcomhaontaı´onn Seanad E´ ireann, That, in accordance with Standing Order de re´ir Bhuan-Ordu´ 52A agus chinneadh an 52A and the decision of the Committee on Choiste um No´ s Imeachta agus Pribhle´idı´, Procedure and Privileges, Seanad E´ ireann go mbeidh Joe McCartin, C.P.E. i la´thair agrees that Joe McCartin, M.E.P. shall agus go bhfaighidh se´ e´isteacht i Seanad attend and be heard in Seanad E´ ireann on E´ ireann, De´ Ce´adaoin 26 Samhain, 2003, Wednesday 26th November, 2003 and that agus go mbeidh feidhm ag na socruithe seo the following arrangements shall apply. The a leanas. Toso´ idh na himeachtaı´ ar 11.15 proceedings shall commence at 11.15 a.m a.m. le haitheasc o´ Joe McCartin, CPE nach with a speech by Joe McCartin, MEP which rachaidh thar 20 no´ ime´ad agus i ndeireadh shall not exceed 20 minutes and at the con- an aithisc sin freagro´ idh sı´ ceisteanna o´ clusion of which he will reply to questions chomhaltaı´ agus go gcrı´ochno´ idh an dı´os- from members and that the debate shall po´ ireacht tra´th nach de´anaı´ na´ 12.30 p.m. conclude no later than 12.30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Values, Religion & Secularism
    Green Values, Religion & Secularism Conversations with European politicians and activists Editors: Nuala Ahern and Erica Meijers Noël Mamère François Mandil Meryem Almaci Tina Walzer & Marco Schreuder Adam Ostolski Agnieszka Kos´cian´ska Yannis Paraskevopoulos Giorgos Dimaras Savas¸ Çömlek Nil Mutluer Mary White Trevor Sargent John Barry Judith Sargentini Sergey Lagodinsky Bettina Jarasch Green Values, Religion & Secularism Green Values, Religion & Secularism Green Values, Religion & Secularism 4 Green Values, Religion & Secularism 5 Green Values, Religion & Secularism Editors: Nuala Ahern and Erica Meijers Introduction 10 Noël Mamère: Meryem Almaci: Do not rouse the ancient When will you finally demons of religion cross that bridge? 22 44 François Mandil: Tina Walzer If you are a Christian, & Marco Schreuder: you simply have to be an Recalling the heyday of ecological activist Vienna’s Jews 34 54 Adam Ostolski: Yannis Paraskevopoulos: What is sacred for us may Religions are not immune not be sacred to others to social change 62 78 Agnieszka Kos´cian´ska: Giorgos Dimaras: The spirit of an ‘open church’ Greece must separate has faded in Poland church and state 70 86 Savas¸ Çömlek: Mary White: Make space for a colourful I am a small part of understanding of religion the great sea of life 94 112 Nil Mutluer: Trevor Sargent: Secularism in Turkey Practice what is not freedom from, you preach but control of belief 122 102 John Barry: Sergey Lagodinsky: What are the stories we The Christian idea of are telling ourselves? religion prevails 130 146 Judith Sargentini: Bettina Jarrasch: Live and let live Develop a different 138 Green Party culture 156 Afterword 167 About the Authors 172 Imprint 174 10 Introduction 11 Religion and politics have much in common.
    [Show full text]