DOCSLIB.ORG

DODGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN Federal Emergency Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DODGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN Federal Emergency Management DODGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER BEAVER DAM, CITY OF 550095 BROWNSVILLE, VILLAGE OF 550096 * CLYMAN, VILLAGE OF 550447 COLUMBUS, CITY OF 550058 DODGE COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 550094 FOX LAKE, CITY OF 550097 HARTFORD, CITY OF 550473 HORICON, CITY OF 550098 HUSTISFORD, VILLAGE OF 550557 * IRON RIDGE, VILLAGE OF 550100 * JUNEAU, CITY OF 550448 KEKOSKEE, VILLAGE OF 550101 * LOMIRA, VILLAGE OF 550449 LOWELL, VILLAGE OF 550102 MAYVILLE, CITY OF 550103 NEOSHO, VILLAGE OF 550104 * RANDOLPH, VILLAGE OF 550072 REESEVILLE, VILLAGE OF 550105 THERESA, VILLAGE OF 550106 WATERTOWN, CITY OF 550107 WAUPUN, CITY OF 550108 * NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IDENTIFIED IN DODGE COUNTY April 19, 2010 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study Number 55027CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A99 AE B X C X The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: April 19, 2010 Revised Countywide Effective Dates: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study.......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgements.............................................................. 2 1.3 Coordination................................................................................................ 4 2.0 AREA STUDIED.....................................................................................................5 2.1 Scope of Study............................................................................................. 5 2.2 Community Description............................................................................... 7 2.3 Principal Flood Problems............................................................................. 8 2.4 Flood Protection Measures........................................................................ 11 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS................................................................................ 12 3.1 Hydrologic Analyses.................................................................................. 12 3.2 Hydraulic Analyses.................................................................................... 18 3.3 Vertical Datum........................................................................................... 23 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS........................................... 25 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries............................................................................... 25 4.2 Floodways.................................................................................................. 26 5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATION............................................................................. 43 6.0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP..................................................................... 43 7.0 OTHER STUDIES................................................................................................. 44 8.0 LOCATION OF DATA......................................................................................... 44 9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES.............................................................. 47 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page FIGURES Figure 1 – Flood Scenes in Beaver Dam, June 2008.........................................................10 Figure 2 – Floodway Schematic........................................................................................ 27 TABLES Table 1 – Initial and Final CCO Meetings........................................................................... 4 Table 2 – Letters of Map Change…………........................................................................ 7 Table 3 – Summary of Stillwater Elevations..................................................................... 16 Table 4 – Summary of Discharges.....................................................................................17 Table 5 – Roughness Coefficients..................................................................................... 22 Table 6 – Vertical Datum Conversion Factor.................................................................... 24 Table 7 – Floodway Data................................................................................................... 28 Table 8 – Community Map History................................................................................... 45 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 - Flood Profiles Panels Beaver Dam River 01P-02P Crawfish River 03P-05P Davy Creek 06P East Branch Rock River 07P-16P Libby Creek 17P Maunesha River 18P Old Mill Creek 19P-21P Park Creek 22P-26P Pratt Creek 27P Rock River 28P-33P Rubicon River 34P Silver Creek 35P-37P Spring Brook 38P Unnamed Tributary to Rock River 39P Exhibit 2 - Flood Insurance Rate Map Index Flood Insurance Rate Map ii FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY DODGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN AND INCORPORATED AREAS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Study This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) revises and updates information on the existence and severity of flood hazards in the geographic area of Dodge County, including the Cities of Beaver Dam, Columbus, Fox Lake, Hartford, Horicon, Juneau, Mayville, Watertown and Waupun; the Villages of Brownsville, Clyman, Hustisford, Iron Ridge, Kekoskee, Lomira, Lowell, Neosho, Randolph, Reeseville, and Theresa; and the unincorporated areas of Dodge County (referred to collectively herein as Dodge County), and aids in the administration of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. This study has developed flood-risk data for various areas of the community that will be used to establish actuarial flood insurance rates and to assist the community in its efforts to promote sound floodplain management. Minimum floodplain management requirements for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) are set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations at 44 CFR, 60.3. Please note that the City of Watertown is geographically located in Dodge and Jefferson Counties. The City of Waupun is geographically located in Fond du Lac and Dodge Counties. The City of Columbus and the Village of Randolph are geographically located in Dodge and Columbia Counties. The City of Hartford is geographically located in Dodge and Washington Counties. The portions of these communities which are contained within Dodge County are included in this FIS. See the separately printed FIS report and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) for areas outside Dodge County. Please note that the City of Juneau and the Villages of Clyman, Iron Ridge, Lomira, and Randolph have no special flood hazard areas identified. In some States or communities, floodplain management criteria or regulations may exist that are more restrictive or comprehensive than the minimum Federal requirements. In such cases, the more restrictive criteria take precedence, and the State (or other jurisdictional agency) will be able to explain them. 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgements The sources of authority for this FIS are the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. This FIS was prepared to include the unincorporated areas and incorporated communities within Dodge County into a countywide FIS. Information on the authority and acknowledgments for each jurisdiction included in this countywide FIS, as compiled from their previously printed FIS reports, is shown below. Beaver Dam, City of: The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for the original FIS report effective on October 3, 1983, were performed by Donohue & Associates, Inc., for FEMA, under contract No. EMW-C-0287. That work was completed in September, 1980. Dodge County (Unincorporated Areas): The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for the original FIS report effective on December 15, 1980, were performed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA), under Inter-Agency Agreement No. IAA-H-9-N, Project Order No. 25. That work was completed in June 1979. Fox Lake, City of: The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for the original FIS report effective on September 16, 1980, were performed by the USGS for the FIA, under Inter- Agency Agreement No. IAA-H-9-77, Project Order No. 25. That work was completed in October 1978. Horicon, City of: The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for the original FIS report effective on February 1980, were performed by the USGS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maps Clyman 2030
    Map 2, Functional Classification of Highways & D R Location of Railroads and Airports A N I` E L ?¬ E Town of Clyman, Dodge County, Wisconsin H Il IJDJ T Iv S OAKMAN RD IJKW LIGHTHOUSE RD IJKW OAKMAN RD I`?¬ Iv Il GUBIN RD D R WILLOW RD MAPLE RD H S L IJKW E IJDJ W N L HOGSBACK RD E IJKW S EAGLE RD EAGLE RD O R M I R P D R Ij FITZGERALD RD E L P A M IJDJ R E D K R C O'SIXTY RD E Iv B CREEK RD ?Ñ ?Ñ ?Ñ D R H S L E W D R E D A H S DEGNITZ M D L RD R E Ij N O I T BLUFF RD C N U 16 16 BIWER RD J SUN RD CB60 AB60 D R N A M L D T L R S E F W N F I D A U L R M B N D D A D D R R R R M BIRCH RD L E W H D N L D E S R O E I I A L T V T W H E S C S P W E N D O U M U R T L J Q L E P L Ii I M H A Ii Ii Ii L D CLYMAN IJDJ R D O D R O E W D A IJCJ H CAUGHLIN ST S N CAUGHLIN RD O M L T D E N R A T D S R E N OAK I A WILSON RD L ELM HILL RD B D R TRAIN RD SHADE RD D R H S E L K E S W U B JUSTMAN RD HILL RD D R E W CLYMET RD N A L SCHMIDT RD S 16 IJDJ R E AB26 V Il O LOVERS E CLYMET RD L W CLYMET RD LANE RD N W CLYMET RD L Id E CLYMET RD R 16 E T AB26 L Il A H Id IJDJ Dodge County Wisconsin Legend Functional Roadway Classification Railroads Principal Arterials o Airport Minor Arterials µ Town Boundaries Major Collectors Municipalities Dodge County Minor Collectors Land Resources and Parks Lake Department Local Town of Clyman Source: Dodge County Land Resources and Parks Department, January 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, Available Online, from Your License Distributor, Or Any DNR Service Center
    Wisconsin Fishing.. it's fun and easy! To use this pamphlet, follow these 5 easy steps: Restrictions: Be familiar with What's New on page 4 and the License Requirements 1 and Statewide Fishing Restrictions on pages 8-11. Trout fishing: If you plan to fish for trout, please see the separate inland trout 2 regulations booklet, Guide to Wisconsin Trout Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, available online, from your license distributor, or any DNR Service Center. Special regulations: Check for special regulations on the water you will be fishing 3 in the section entitled Special Regulations-Listed by County beginning on page 28. Great Lakes, Winnebago System Waters, and Boundary Waters: If you are 4 planning to fish on the Great Lakes, their tributaries, Winnebago System waters or waters bordering other states, check the appropriate tables on pages 64–76. Statewide rules: If the water you will be fishing is not found in theSpecial Regulations- 5 Listed by County and is not a Great Lake, Winnebago system, or boundary water, statewide rules apply. See the regulation table for General Inland Waters on pages 62–63 for seasons, length and bag limits, listed by species. ** This pamphlet is an interpretive summary of Wisconsin’s fishing laws and regulations. For complete fishing laws and regulations, including those that are implemented after the publica- tion of this pamphlet, consult the Wisconsin State Statutes Chapter 29 or the Administrative Code of the Department of Natural Resources. Consult the legislative website - http://docs. legis.wi.gov - for more information. For the most up-to-date version of this pamphlet, go to dnr.wi.gov search words, “fishing regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Mitigation Plan Dodge County, Wisconsin
    Hazard Mitigation Plan Dodge County, Wisconsin Plan Update – August 2020 EPTEC, Inc. Lenora G. Borchardt 7027 Fawn Lane Sun Prairie, WI 53590-9455 608-358-4267 [email protected] Contents Table of Contents *update when final Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 3 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction and Background .......................................................................................... 9 Previous Planning Efforts and Legal Basis ......................................................... 10 Plan Preparation, Adoption and Maintenance .................................................... 16 Physical Characteristics of Dodge County .................................................................... 23 General Community Introduction ........................................................................ 23 Plan Area ............................................................................................................ 24 Geology .............................................................................................................. 25 Topography ........................................................................................................ 27 Climate ............................................................................................................... 28 Hydrology ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018
    Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress 2018 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Water Quality Bureau Division of Environmental Management Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 101 South Webster Street • PO Box 7921 • Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7921 dnr.wi.gov i Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Governor Scott Walker Natural Resources Board Terry Hilgenberg, Chair Dr. Frederick Rehn, Vice-Chair Julie Anderson, Secretary William Bruins Preston D. Cole Gregory Kazmierski Gary Zimmer Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Daniel Meyer, Secretary Ed Eberle, Deputy Secretary Pat Stevens, Assistant Deputy Jim Zellmer, Environmental Division Deputy Administrator Sharon Gayan, Director, Water Quality Bureau Steve Galarneau, Director, Office of Great Waters Pam Biersach, Director, Watershed Management Justine Hasz, Director, Fisheries Management Steve Elmore, Director, Drinking Water & Groundwater Cover Photo: View of Seidel Lake in Florence County. Photo by Luke Ernster. ii Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Wisconsin’s Water Quality Report The Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires all states to prepare a Water Quality Report to Congress every two years. This “Integrated Report” combines the CWA sections 305(b) and 303(d). The report contains an overall summary of water quality conditions in the State and an updated Impaired Waters List. Wisconsin data are also provided electronically to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Integrated Reporting Process. Wisconsin’s 2018 Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress summarizes assessment progress and activities related to water quality protection during the past two years. This document is an online publication only that can be accessed at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) website: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/surfacewater/assessments.html.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    OUB Ho 1024-0018 NPS Fcxm \0-fOO (FUv R~M) 233, United States Department of the Interior FEB271989 National Park Service NATIONAL National Register of Historic Places REGISTER Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines tor Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets KForm 10-900a). Type all entries. 1 . Name of Property historic name Copeland-Ryder Company other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number 411 Wisconsin Drive TH/Anot for publication city, town Jefferson jj/Jwicinity state Wisconsiflode WI county Jefferson code 055 zip code 53549 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property 00 private [X] building(s) Contributing Noncontributing { 1 public-local [.73 district 2 0 buildings [U public-State Dsite sites CU public-Federal [ ] structure structures 1 1 object objects 2 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register _. 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this |X| nomination I I request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Heritage Area Plan
    Glacial Heritage Area Plan Conceptual Plan for: Master Plan for: Conservation Parks State Wildlife Areas COLD SPRING CONSERVATION PARK DEANSVILLE STATE WILDLIFE AREA DOROTHY CARNES CONSERVATION PARK GOOSE LAKE STATE WILDLIFE AREA JEFFERSON MARSH STATE WILDLIFE AREA & STATE DR. J.S. GARMAN NATURE PRESERVE NATURAL AREA KORTH CONSERVATION PARK KOSHKONONG STATE WILDLIFE AREA LAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PRESERVE LAKE MILLS STATE WILDLIFE AREA CUSHMAN MILL CONSERVATION PARK LIMA MARSH – STORR’S LAKE STATE WILDLIFE AREA HOLZHUETER FARM CONSERVATION PARK PRINCE’S POINT STATE WILDLIFE AREA HOPE LAKE CONSERVATION PARK ROME POND STATE WILDLIFE AREA NORTH SHORE MORAINE CONSERVATION PARK WATERLOO – MUD LAKE STATE WILDLIFE AREA OAKLAND HIGHLANDS CONSERVATION PARK RED CEDAR LAKE CONSERVATION PARK CRAWFISH PRAIRIE STATE HABITAT AREA RURAL LANDSCAPE PROTECTION AREAS SCUPPERNONG VALLEY CONSERVATION PARK State Natural Area Linking Trails RED CEDAR LAKE STATE NATURAL AREA River-based Conservation Areas ALLEN CREEK CONSERVATION AREA LOWER BARK RIVER CONSERVATION AREA LOWER KOSHKONONG CREEK CONSERVATION AREA WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Bureau of Facilities and Lands GLACIAL HERITAGE AREA WM-GHA-OVERVIEW acr Map Updated: March 2011 l i a r . T R e t m a a t Glacial Heritage Area D S r e v 26 e 151 a s e Project Area B Lowell o o 60 60 G d l 16 i W 0 2.5 5 Miles Reeseville 67 . R h s 89 i f w a r C M a u n 73 e Deansville s h 109 a Wildlife Area Waterloo- R DODGE CO. Mud Lake Wildlife Area Langer 19 Family Waterloo Park Marshall Watertown .
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report Language for Your Consideration
    Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Phosphorus and Total Suspended Solids in the Rock River Basin Columbia, Dane, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Green, Green Lake, Jefferson, Rock, Walworth, Washington, and Waukesha Counties, Wisconsin July 2011 Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Wisconsin Department of Agency Natural Resources Region 5 101 S. Webster Street, PO Box 7921 77 W. Jackson Blvd. Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7921 Chicago, IL 60604 Prepared by: Rock River TMDL – Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Problem Statement ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION .................................................................... 10 2.1. Watershed Characteristics ........................................................................................................ 10 2.2. Water Quality .......................................................................................................................... 14 3.0 APPLICABLE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ..................................................... 17 3.1. Designated Uses ....................................................................................................................... 17 3.2. Narrative
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson County, Wisconsin, and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WISCONSIN, AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Name Number Cambridge, Village of 550080 Fort Atkinson, City of 555554 Jefferson, City of 555561 Jefferson County, Unincorporated Areas 550191 Johnson Creek, Village of 550194 Lac LaBelle, Village of 550565 Lake Mills, City of 550195 Palmyra, Village of 550196 Sullivan, Village of 550197 Waterloo, City of 550198 Watertown, City of 550107 Whitewater, City of 550200 PRELIMINARY Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 55055CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this Preliminary FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: June 2, 2009 Revised Countywide FIS Date: TBD TABLE OF CONTENTS – VOLUME 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Materials Section
    YOUR RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD ~ THE ROCK RIVER BASIN Reference Materials Section 123 YOUR RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD ~ THE ROCK RIVER BASIN Natural Resources Acronym Guide State/County Agencies DATCP Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection DNR Department of Natural Resources DOC Department of Commerce DOT Department of Transportation LCD Land Conservation Department LWCB Land and Water Conservation Board NPM Nutrient and Pest Management UWEX University of Wisconsin - Extension WGNHS WI Geographical and Natural History Survey Federal Agencies (many have county or regional offices) EPA Environmental Protection Agency FSA Farm Services Administration NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service RC&D Resource Conservation & Development USCOE U. S. Army Corp of Engineers USDA U. S. Department of Agriculture USFS U. S. Forest Service USFWS U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U. S. Geological Survey Conservation Programs CRP Conservation Reserve Program (federal) CREP Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (federal) EQIP Environmental Quality Incentive Program (federal) FIP Forestry Incentive Program (federal) FPP Farmland Preservation Program (state) GHRA Glacial Habitat Restoration Are (state) LESA Land Evaluation Site Assessment MFL Managed Forest Law (state) NPS Nonpoint Source Program (state) SIP Stewardship Incentive Program (federal) TRM Targeted Resource Management Program (state) WRP Wetland Reserve Program (federal) WHIP Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (federal) Conservation Organizations RRHI Rock River Headwaters, Inc. (formerly Horicon Marsh Area Coalition) RRC Rock River Coalition RRP Rock River Watershed Partnership Educational Initiatives WAV Water Action Volunteers WERC Water Education Resource Centers WET Project WET (Water Education) WILD Project WILD (Wildlife Education) 124 YOUR RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD ~ THE ROCK RIVER BASIN Glossary A Algae: simple, single-celled aquatic plant. A good indicator of excessive nutrients of lakes and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • The Streams of Time: the History of Channelization in Dane County's
    The Streams of Time: The History of Channelization in Dane County’s Riparian Systems and the Hope for Healing Authored by Claire Kuettner, Marielle Milligan, and Kyle Watter The University of Wisconsin - Madison, Department of Geography Geography Undergraduate Colloquium December 16, 2017 Abstract: Water is, and likely will always be, both a celebrated and fervently contested natural resource. Rivers have been both a basis for development of civilization and a victim of that development. Dane County, Wisconsin is no different, with streams both near cities and in the midst of farmlands whose natural bends and meanders have been forced off their natural course by the pressures imposed by urbanization and irrigation. This study defines the timeline of channelization in and the threats this poses to the ecological health of Dane County’s stream systems from 1836 to 2013. The 10 streams that were investigated all faced varying levels of channelization, despite their different lengths and settings within the county, exemplifying that waterway alterations have known no bounds in the past. However, actions taken by several organizations and government officials indicate that there is hope for the healing of these damaged systems. Introduction In a country where nature has been so lavish and where we have been so spendthrift of indigenous beauty, to set aside a few rivers in their natural state should be considered an obligation. Frank Church, U.S. Senate sponsor of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act Whether for recreation, transportation, or irrigation, it is always the hope of people settling in a new area that a reliable water source is near by.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 5-1, Prime Agricultural Soils Dodge County, Wisconsin
    Map 5-1, Prime Agricultural Soils Dodge County, Wisconsin 49 WAUPUN 41 F O X L A K E 68 BROWNSVILLE 49 175 L E R O Y C H E S T E R LOMIRA 26 67 175 FOX LAKE 33 L O M II R A 41 33 T R E N T O N 151 RANDOLPH 28 28 67 73 KEKOSKEE 175 W II L L II A M S T O W N 28 67 THERESA W E S T F O R D B U R N E T T B U R N E T T MAYVILLE T H E R E S A 175 28 BEAVER DAM 67 33 26 HORICON B E A V E R D A M O A K G R O V E H U B B A R D 33 C A L A M U S 73 H E R M A N JUNEAU 151 IRON RIDGE 26 L O W E L L HUSTISFORD E L B A 60 LOWELL HARTFORD 16 60 16 60 60 COLUMBUS C L Y M A N R U B II C O N CLYMAN NEOSHO REESEVILLE H U S T II S F O R D 16 26 P O R T L A N D P O R T L A N D L E B A N O N A S H II P P U N S H II E L D S E M M E T 67 16 26 89 19 WATERTOWN 19 LEGEND 151 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Waterlooa GREEN and HEALTHY
    City of Waterloo A GREEN AND HEALTHY COMMUNITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN adopted August 7, 2008 Vandewalle & Associates City of Waterloo Comprehensive Plan The City of Waterloo: A Green and Healthy Community The City of Waterloo intends to become a Green and Healthy Community. Being a Green and Healthy community means taking a system-wide perspective for resolving community issues and promoting community growth and health. The color green is symbolic of growth. The following components of a Green and Healthy community are addressed and reinforced throughout this Comprehensive Plan Advancing each of these components will be a long-term and on-going endeavor. Environmental Health Waterloo’s viability relies on the health of its natural systems. The quality of the water we drink and the air we breathe as well as the integrity of the soil, natural areas, and wildlife populations provide the essential foundation for economic, social, and personal health. In Waterloo, environmental health also helps to define the community’s sense of place. The City is defined, linked, and bounded by natural features like the wetlands, the Maunesha River, natural and wildlife areas, and wooded drumlins. Paying attention to how growth and development affects these resources, and how these resources are an asset to community growth, will contribute significantly to the achievement of Waterloo’s future vision. Throughout this Plan, the symbol will identify policies, programs, recommendations, and strategies that specifically advance environmental health. Economic Health Economic health in Waterloo is defined by the availability of opportunities for residents to efficiently meet their day-to-day employment, service, shopping, and entertainment demands within the community.
    [Show full text]