DOCSLIB.ORG

DANE COUNTY, WISCONSIN and INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DANE COUNTY, WISCONSIN and INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 2 DANE COUNTY, WISCONSIN AND INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 2 Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number BELLEVILLE, VILLAGE OF 550159 MAPLE BLUFF, VILLAGE OF 550618 BLACK EARTH, VILLAGE OF 550079 MARSHALL, VILLAGE OF 550084 *BLUE MOUNDS, VILLAGE OF 550620 MAZOMANIE, VILLAGE OF 550085 BROOKLYN, VILLAGE OF 550621 McFARLAND, VILLAGE OF 550086 CAMBRIDGE, VILLAGE OF 550080 MIDDLETON, CITY OF 550087 COTTAGE GROVE, VILLAGE OF 550617 MONONA, CITY OF 550088 CROSS PLAINS, VILLAGE OF 550081 MOUNT HOREB, VILLAGE OF 550624 DANE COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 550077 OREGON, VILLAGE OF 550089 *DANE, VILLAGE OF 550622 ROCKDALE, VILLAGE OF 550090 DEERFIELD, VILLAGE OF 550623 SHOREWOOD HILLS, VILLAGE OF 550556 DeFOREST, VILLAGE OF 550082 STOUGHTON, CITY OF 550091 EDGERTON, CITY OF 550365 SUN PRAIRIE, CITY OF 550573 FITCHBURG, CITY OF 550610 VERONA, CITY OF 550092 MADISON, CITY OF 550083 WAUNAKEE, VILLAGE OF 550093 * NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IDENTIFIED WITHIN COMMUNITY REVISED: January 2, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 55025CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Effective Date: 06/17/03 Revised Dates: 01/02/09 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of Study............................................................................................................1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments ..................................................................................1 1.3 Coordination ..................................................................................................................6 2.0 AREA STUDIED .................................................................................................................8 2.1 Scope of Study...............................................................................................................8 2.2 Community Description.................................................................................................10 2.3 Principal Flood Problems...............................................................................................10 2.4 Flood Protection Measures ............................................................................................14 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS .............................................................................................14 3.1 Hydrologic Analyses......................................................................................................15 3.2 Hydraulic Analyses........................................................................................................25 3.3 Vertical Datum...............................................................................................................33 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS ......................................................34 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries...................................................................................................34 4.2 Floodways......................................................................................................................35 5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATIONS ........................................................................................91 6.0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP ..................................................................................91 7.0 OTHER STUDIES...............................................................................................................92 8.0 LOCATION OF DATA.......................................................................................................92 9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES ..........................................................................96 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) FIGURES Figure 1 – Floodway Schematic ....................................................................................................... 37 TABLES Table 1 – CCO Meeting Dates............................................................................................................ 7 Table 2 – Flooding Sources Studies By Detailed Methods ................................................................ 8 Table 3 – Letters of Map Change ....................................................................................................... 9 Table 4 – Summary of Discharges.................................................................................................... 20 Table 5 – Summary of Stillwater Elevations .................................................................................... 24 Table 6 – Floodway Data.................................................................................................................. 38 Table 7 – Community Map History.................................................................................................. 93 VOLUME 2 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 - Flood Profiles Badger Mill Creek 01P – 03P Badger Mill Creek Diversion Channel 04P Black Earth Creek 05P – 10P Black Earth Creek Secondary Channel 11P Brewery Creek 12P Dorn Creek 13P – 16P Dry Tributary to Badger Mill Creek 17P – 19P East Branch Badger Mill Creek 20P East Branch Starkweather Creek 21P – 22P Enchanted Valley Creek 23P – 25P Greenway 26P Koshkonong Creek 27P – 36P Maunesha River 37P – 38P Milwaukee Street Tributary 39P Nine Springs Creek 40P – 41P Oregon Branch Badfish Creek 42P – 43P Pennito Creek 44P – 45P Pheasant Branch 46P – 49P Portage Road Tributary 50P – 51P Sixmile Creek 52P – 56P South Fork to Pheasant Branch 57P Starkweather Creek 58P Sugar River 59P – 63P Token Creek 64P Unnamed Tributary to Lake Waubesa 65P – 67P Vermont Creek 68P West Branch Starkweather Creek 69P – 72P Wisconsin River 73P – 75P Yahara River 76P – 97P Exhibit 2 - Flood Insurance Rate Map Index Flood Insurance Rate Map ii FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY DANE COUNTY, WISCONSIN AND INCORPORATED AREAS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Study This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) revises and updates information on the existence and severity of flood hazards in the geographic area of Dane County, Wisconsin, including the Cities of Edgerton, Fitchburg, Madison, Middleton, Monona, Stoughton, Sun Prairie, and Verona; the Villages of Belleville, Black Earth, Brooklyn, Cambridge, Cottage Grove, Cross Plains, Deerfield, Deforest, Marshall, Mazomanie, McFarland, Mount Horeb, Oregon, Rockdale, Shorewood Hills and Waunakee; and the unincorporated areas of Dane County (referred to collectively herein as Dane County). The following communities are non-floodprone: the Villages of Blue Mounds and Dane. The City of Edgerton and Villages of Belleville, Brooklyn, and Cambridge are located in more than one county. Only the portions of these communities within Dane County are shown. This FIS aids in the administration of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. This study has developed flood-risk data for various areas of the community that will be used to establish actuarial flood insurance rates. This information will be used by Dane County to update existing floodplain regulations as part of the Regular Phase of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The information will also be used by local and regional planners to further promote sound land use and floodplain development. Minimum floodplain management requirements for participation in the NFIP are set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations at 44 CFR, 60.3. In some states or communities, floodplain management criteria or regulations may exist that are more restrictive or comprehensive than the minimum Federal requirements. In such cases, the more restrictive criteria take precedence and the State (or other jurisdictional agency) will be able to explain them. 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments The sources of authority for this FIS are the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. Information on the authority and acknowledgments for each jurisdiction included in this countywide FIS, as compiled from their previously printed FIS reports, is shown on the following pages. 1 Belleville, Village of: The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for the FIS report dated September 18, 1986, were prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA) under Inter-Agency Agreement No. IAA-H-14-78, Project Order No. 3. That work was completed in November 1978. In a 1986 revision to this study, the hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for Sugar River were performed by the State of Wisconsin, Department of Natural Resources (DNR). FEMA reviewed and accepted these data for purposes of this revision. Black Earth, Village of: The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, Available Online, from Your License Distributor, Or Any DNR Service Center
    Wisconsin Fishing.. it's fun and easy! To use this pamphlet, follow these 5 easy steps: Restrictions: Be familiar with What's New on page 4 and the License Requirements 1 and Statewide Fishing Restrictions on pages 8-11. Trout fishing: If you plan to fish for trout, please see the separate inland trout 2 regulations booklet, Guide to Wisconsin Trout Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, available online, from your license distributor, or any DNR Service Center. Special regulations: Check for special regulations on the water you will be fishing 3 in the section entitled Special Regulations-Listed by County beginning on page 28. Great Lakes, Winnebago System Waters, and Boundary Waters: If you are 4 planning to fish on the Great Lakes, their tributaries, Winnebago System waters or waters bordering other states, check the appropriate tables on pages 64–76. Statewide rules: If the water you will be fishing is not found in theSpecial Regulations- 5 Listed by County and is not a Great Lake, Winnebago system, or boundary water, statewide rules apply. See the regulation table for General Inland Waters on pages 62–63 for seasons, length and bag limits, listed by species. ** This pamphlet is an interpretive summary of Wisconsin’s fishing laws and regulations. For complete fishing laws and regulations, including those that are implemented after the publica- tion of this pamphlet, consult the Wisconsin State Statutes Chapter 29 or the Administrative Code of the Department of Natural Resources. Consult the legislative website - http://docs. legis.wi.gov - for more information. For the most up-to-date version of this pamphlet, go to dnr.wi.gov search words, “fishing regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Mitigation Plan Dodge County, Wisconsin
    Hazard Mitigation Plan Dodge County, Wisconsin Plan Update – August 2020 EPTEC, Inc. Lenora G. Borchardt 7027 Fawn Lane Sun Prairie, WI 53590-9455 608-358-4267 [email protected] Contents Table of Contents *update when final Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 3 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction and Background .......................................................................................... 9 Previous Planning Efforts and Legal Basis ......................................................... 10 Plan Preparation, Adoption and Maintenance .................................................... 16 Physical Characteristics of Dodge County .................................................................... 23 General Community Introduction ........................................................................ 23 Plan Area ............................................................................................................ 24 Geology .............................................................................................................. 25 Topography ........................................................................................................ 27 Climate ............................................................................................................... 28 Hydrology ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report Language for Your Consideration
    Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Phosphorus and Total Suspended Solids in the Rock River Basin Columbia, Dane, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Green, Green Lake, Jefferson, Rock, Walworth, Washington, and Waukesha Counties, Wisconsin July 2011 Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Wisconsin Department of Agency Natural Resources Region 5 101 S. Webster Street, PO Box 7921 77 W. Jackson Blvd. Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7921 Chicago, IL 60604 Prepared by: Rock River TMDL – Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Problem Statement ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION .................................................................... 10 2.1. Watershed Characteristics ........................................................................................................ 10 2.2. Water Quality .......................................................................................................................... 14 3.0 APPLICABLE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ..................................................... 17 3.1. Designated Uses ....................................................................................................................... 17 3.2. Narrative
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson County, Wisconsin, and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WISCONSIN, AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Name Number Cambridge, Village of 550080 Fort Atkinson, City of 555554 Jefferson, City of 555561 Jefferson County, Unincorporated Areas 550191 Johnson Creek, Village of 550194 Lac LaBelle, Village of 550565 Lake Mills, City of 550195 Palmyra, Village of 550196 Sullivan, Village of 550197 Waterloo, City of 550198 Watertown, City of 550107 Whitewater, City of 550200 PRELIMINARY Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 55055CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this Preliminary FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: June 2, 2009 Revised Countywide FIS Date: TBD TABLE OF CONTENTS – VOLUME 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Materials Section
    YOUR RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD ~ THE ROCK RIVER BASIN Reference Materials Section 123 YOUR RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD ~ THE ROCK RIVER BASIN Natural Resources Acronym Guide State/County Agencies DATCP Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection DNR Department of Natural Resources DOC Department of Commerce DOT Department of Transportation LCD Land Conservation Department LWCB Land and Water Conservation Board NPM Nutrient and Pest Management UWEX University of Wisconsin - Extension WGNHS WI Geographical and Natural History Survey Federal Agencies (many have county or regional offices) EPA Environmental Protection Agency FSA Farm Services Administration NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service RC&D Resource Conservation & Development USCOE U. S. Army Corp of Engineers USDA U. S. Department of Agriculture USFS U. S. Forest Service USFWS U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U. S. Geological Survey Conservation Programs CRP Conservation Reserve Program (federal) CREP Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (federal) EQIP Environmental Quality Incentive Program (federal) FIP Forestry Incentive Program (federal) FPP Farmland Preservation Program (state) GHRA Glacial Habitat Restoration Are (state) LESA Land Evaluation Site Assessment MFL Managed Forest Law (state) NPS Nonpoint Source Program (state) SIP Stewardship Incentive Program (federal) TRM Targeted Resource Management Program (state) WRP Wetland Reserve Program (federal) WHIP Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (federal) Conservation Organizations RRHI Rock River Headwaters, Inc. (formerly Horicon Marsh Area Coalition) RRC Rock River Coalition RRP Rock River Watershed Partnership Educational Initiatives WAV Water Action Volunteers WERC Water Education Resource Centers WET Project WET (Water Education) WILD Project WILD (Wildlife Education) 124 YOUR RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD ~ THE ROCK RIVER BASIN Glossary A Algae: simple, single-celled aquatic plant. A good indicator of excessive nutrients of lakes and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • The Streams of Time: the History of Channelization in Dane County's
    The Streams of Time: The History of Channelization in Dane County’s Riparian Systems and the Hope for Healing Authored by Claire Kuettner, Marielle Milligan, and Kyle Watter The University of Wisconsin - Madison, Department of Geography Geography Undergraduate Colloquium December 16, 2017 Abstract: Water is, and likely will always be, both a celebrated and fervently contested natural resource. Rivers have been both a basis for development of civilization and a victim of that development. Dane County, Wisconsin is no different, with streams both near cities and in the midst of farmlands whose natural bends and meanders have been forced off their natural course by the pressures imposed by urbanization and irrigation. This study defines the timeline of channelization in and the threats this poses to the ecological health of Dane County’s stream systems from 1836 to 2013. The 10 streams that were investigated all faced varying levels of channelization, despite their different lengths and settings within the county, exemplifying that waterway alterations have known no bounds in the past. However, actions taken by several organizations and government officials indicate that there is hope for the healing of these damaged systems. Introduction In a country where nature has been so lavish and where we have been so spendthrift of indigenous beauty, to set aside a few rivers in their natural state should be considered an obligation. Frank Church, U.S. Senate sponsor of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act Whether for recreation, transportation, or irrigation, it is always the hope of people settling in a new area that a reliable water source is near by.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Waterlooa GREEN and HEALTHY
    City of Waterloo A GREEN AND HEALTHY COMMUNITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN adopted August 7, 2008 Vandewalle & Associates City of Waterloo Comprehensive Plan The City of Waterloo: A Green and Healthy Community The City of Waterloo intends to become a Green and Healthy Community. Being a Green and Healthy community means taking a system-wide perspective for resolving community issues and promoting community growth and health. The color green is symbolic of growth. The following components of a Green and Healthy community are addressed and reinforced throughout this Comprehensive Plan Advancing each of these components will be a long-term and on-going endeavor. Environmental Health Waterloo’s viability relies on the health of its natural systems. The quality of the water we drink and the air we breathe as well as the integrity of the soil, natural areas, and wildlife populations provide the essential foundation for economic, social, and personal health. In Waterloo, environmental health also helps to define the community’s sense of place. The City is defined, linked, and bounded by natural features like the wetlands, the Maunesha River, natural and wildlife areas, and wooded drumlins. Paying attention to how growth and development affects these resources, and how these resources are an asset to community growth, will contribute significantly to the achievement of Waterloo’s future vision. Throughout this Plan, the symbol will identify policies, programs, recommendations, and strategies that specifically advance environmental health. Economic Health Economic health in Waterloo is defined by the availability of opportunities for residents to efficiently meet their day-to-day employment, service, shopping, and entertainment demands within the community.
    [Show full text]
  • DODGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN Federal Emergency Management
    DODGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER BEAVER DAM, CITY OF 550095 BROWNSVILLE, VILLAGE OF 550096 * CLYMAN, VILLAGE OF 550447 COLUMBUS, CITY OF 550058 DODGE COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 550094 FOX LAKE, CITY OF 550097 HARTFORD, CITY OF 550473 HORICON, CITY OF 550098 HUSTISFORD, VILLAGE OF 550557 * IRON RIDGE, VILLAGE OF 550100 * JUNEAU, CITY OF 550448 KEKOSKEE, VILLAGE OF 550101 * LOMIRA, VILLAGE OF 550449 LOWELL, VILLAGE OF 550102 MAYVILLE, CITY OF 550103 NEOSHO, VILLAGE OF 550104 * RANDOLPH, VILLAGE OF 550072 REESEVILLE, VILLAGE OF 550105 THERESA, VILLAGE OF 550106 WATERTOWN, CITY OF 550107 WAUPUN, CITY OF 550108 * NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IDENTIFIED IN DODGE COUNTY April 19, 2010 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study Number 55027CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A99 AE B X C X The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Badfish Creek Watershed: Page 2 RRC President’S Message RRC Organizational Tracking Down E
    A publication of the Rock River Coalition in cooperation with the Rock River Stormwater Group Fall 2020 Volume 23, Number 2 Look Inside Friends of Badfish Creek Watershed: Page 2 RRC President’s Message RRC Organizational Tracking Down E. Coli Bacteria Assessment Funding from James By Brooke Alexander Dutton Foundations Friends of Badfish Creek made to divert it instead to Page 3 Watershed became the Badfish Creek. Since then, Restoration Pleasant first chapter of Rock River wastewater treatment has Valley Branch E coli Tracking cont. Coalition in 2007. This year, vastly improved and the Friends of Badfish Creek water quality of the effluent Page 4 Watershed began to conduct discharged is comparable RRSG: Protecting Our analysis on concerning levels to that of the surface water Home Waterways Salt Reduction: Jefferson of E. coli to track down the it joins. However, the water County source. The following story quality is still monitored and interview with member closely. Page 5 and unofficial director, Lynne Becoming the Maunesha The Rock County Health Diebel, tells the story. River Alliance Department monitors E. JCWA Updates Badfish Creek is a tributary coli in the lower reach Page 6 to the Yahara River of the Badfish, the lower Farmers, Ranchers characterized by its crafty Yahara River and other Improve Water Quality currents, wide floodplain Rock County lakes and RR Clean-up Goes High and unique relationship to streams to ensure the Tech Madison’s sewerage system. safety of recreators. In Page 7 It was adopted by a group 2018, Rock County became Trees Cleared From of energetic individuals in Paul Garrison (foreground) and Ralph Erickson (back) sampling on February concerned about rising Yahara River 2006 who formed ‘Friends 11, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Drainage-Area Data for Wisconsin Streams
    Click here to return to USGS publications U.S . Geological Survey Open-File Report 83-933 Drainage-Area Data For Wisconsin Streams Prepared in cooperation with the WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Rock-Fox-Des Plaines River Basin-Continued . TYPE STATION DRAINAGE STREAM AND LOCATION TOWNSHIP RANGE SECTION COUNTY NUMBER OF AREA (mi-) SITE Mississippi River--Continued Rock River--Continued Crawfish River--Continued )5425600 North Branch Crawfish River near 11 N 12 E NW1/4SW1/4 14 Columbia 2 69 .1 Columbus, County Trunk Highway DG )5425640 North Branch Crawfish River at Fall 11 N 12 E SE1/4SE1/4 27 Columbia 2 76 .2 River, County Trunk Highway D )5425645 North Branch Crawfish River at Fall 11 N 12 E SE1/4NE1/4 34 Columbia 5 77 .7 River, at sewage-treatment plant )5425650 North Branch Crawfish River near Fall 11 N 12 E SEl/4SE1/4 34 Columbia 5 80 .0 River, town road )5425700 Robbins Creek near Columbus, U.S . 10 N 12 E NE1/4SE1/4 11 Columbia 4 8 .01 Highway 16 )5425716 Crawfish River at Columbus, U .S . Highway 16 10 N 12 E NE1/4SE1/4 13 Columbia 5 164 )5425718 Crawfish River tributary at Columbus, 10 N 13 E NW1/4SW1/4 18 Dodge 5 1 .90 State Highway 60 )5425720 Crawfish River at Columbus, at sewage- 10 N 13 E NW1/4NW1/4 19 Dodge 5 167 treatment plant )5425790 Nolan Creek at Danville, at mouth 10 N 13 E NW1/4SE1/4 22 Dodge 7 8 .28 )5425800 Crawfish River near Danville, County Trunk 10 N 13 E NE1/4SW1/4 26 Dodge 6 207 Highway TT )5425810 Mud Creek near Danville, at mouth 9 N 13 E SE1/4NW1/4 2 Dodge 7 15 .2 )5425827 Maunesha River near
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritizing Wetland Restoration in the Upper Rock River Basin
    A note about Web sites All URLs in this document were current at the time of publication. An Equal Educational Opportunity Institution (Title VI,Title IX) In conformance with applicable federal and state law and with university policy, the University of Wisconsin-Madison does not discriminate on the basis of age, race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, sexual orientation, arrest or conviction record, marital status, handicap, political affi liation, or veteran’s status with regard to treatment of employees and students in its educational programs or activities. Inquiries concerning this policy may be directed to appropriate campus admitting or employing units or to the Equity and Diversity Resource Center, 179A Bascom Hall, 608/263-2378. Disabled persons should contact the McBurney Disability Resource Center, 905 University Avenue, 608/263-2741 (voice/TDD), for information and referral. The Water Resources Management Practicum is a regular part of the curricu­ lum of the Water Resources Management (WRM) Graduate Program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The workshop involves an interdisciplinary team of faculty members and graduate students in the analysis of a contempo­ rary water resources problem. The conclusions and recommendations are those of the graduate student authors and do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views or policies of any of the cooperating agencies or organizations, nor does the mention of any trade names, commercial products, or companies constitute endorsement or recom­ mendation for use. For more information, contact: Gaylord Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies Public Information Offi ce 15 Science Hall 550 North Park Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 ✆ 608/263-3185 http://www.ies.wisc.edu This publication is available online at: http://www.ies.wisc.edu/wrm/workshops/2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Kark's Canoeing and Kayaking Guide to 309 Wisconsin Streams
    Kark's Canoeing and Kayaking Guide to 309 Wisconsin Streams By Richard Kark May 2015 Introduction A Badger Stream Love Affair My fascination with rivers started near my hometown of Osage, Iowa on the Cedar River. High school buddies and I fished the river and canoe-camped along its lovely limestone bluffs. In 1969 I graduated from St. Olaf College in Minnesota and soon paddled my first Wisconsin stream. With my college sweetheart I spent three days and two nights canoe-camping from Taylors Falls to Stillwater on the St. Croix River. “Sweet Caroline” by Neil Diamond blared from our transistor radio as we floated this lovely stream which was designated a National Wild and Scenic River in 1968. Little did I know I would eventually explore more than 300 other Wisconsin streams. In the late 1970s I was preoccupied by my medical studies in Milwaukee but did find the time to explore some rivers. I recall canoeing the Oconto, Chippewa, Kickapoo, “Illinois Fox,” and West Twin Rivers during those years. Several of us traveled to the Peshtigo River and rafted “Roaring Rapids” with a commercial company. At the time I could not imagine riding this torrent in a canoe. We also rafted Piers Gorge on the Menomonee River. Our guide failed to avoid Volkswagen Rock over Mishicot Falls. We flipped and I experienced the second worst “swim” of my life. Was I deterred from whitewater? Just the opposite, it seems. By the late 1970s I was a practicing physician, but I found time for Wisconsin rivers. In 1979 I signed up for the tandem whitewater clinic run by the River Touring Section of the Sierra Club’s John Muir Chapter.
    [Show full text]