(Entmwttntimm Satlg fflampua T U I T I 0 N The Campus Perspective March 25, 1971 H|^^ !?• AT:-, * if not here where? Copyright 1971 by The Connecticut Daily Campus except reprined material PAGE TWO THE CAMPUS PERSPECTIVE Thursday, March 25, 1971 1 X-KJ uconn prof hits meskUVs economics By MILTON R. STERN or subtract. Should our junior high schools impose tuition? Where does Professor of English, UConn one stop? Wherein is the higher education different from the lower Special to Th« Compus education In the concept of social and individual benefits accruing Fundamentally all arguments for free public education must define from a PUBLIC educational system? the social perspectives within which higher education Is viewed: some- Furthermore, because the median Income of the families of Unt- 4* 4*5*- thing like 'of the people, by the people, for the people.' But there is verslty students Is now $12,800, what will happen to that median U little time left at this point for formulations of social philosophy and tuition is Imposed? It must go up. We have no way of knowing how many besides, the 'hardheaded, practical, fiscally responsible" citizens are qualified and potentially constructive students are now being denied only interested in arguments of dollars and cents. Okay. an education because the costs of attendance at the University are Proponents of a tuition fee argue that a user's tax makes sense: ALREADY too high. those who benefit from a social Institution should pay for It more than And consider this: the very people who argue that because students those who don't. First of all, users do pay--and pay and pay and pay. will earn a higher income they should pay higher fees never once say Precisely because college graduates do benefit from their education that in hard times, when people can find no jobs, that graduates should and as a group earn higher incomes than non-graduates, they are be reimbursed by the state because as students they had Invested exactly the ones who pay the taxes that support the public Institu- more in the possibilities of a higher income than had non-users of tions. This argument can be explored from various viewpoints, and the public higher educational system. You can bet the cost of your the more one pushes the point, the more evident it becomes that it Is education you won't hear them saying any such thing. Insupportable to assume that the people who use the higher educational system don't already pay for and support It. But let's turn the argument around. Do the good citizens REALLY want a user's tax? We support state and local police with tax money. Few of us ever use the police. "no compromise on this issue ... no little bit of preg- When we do, should we be billed for our experience? Few of us use the tax supported fire department. When we do, should we pay a nancy" special 'tuition* assessment? Every street and road in this state Is supported by tax money of one kind or another: should we Install "tuition" turnstiles at the head of each street so that the users can pay Those who argue that tuition fees will separate out the students more than other taxpayers? Obviously, when one advances such argu- who really want an education from those who merely play are pro- ments, the concept of a user tax for public services becomes either bably quite wrong In actual fact. The higher Income suburban home too foolish or toocomplexto be useful. tends to be the home in which a college education is a status neces- What one finally comes to is the redefinition of what we want in a sity, an expectation. It is the home in which daddy and mom tend tc civilized society. We all use streets, schools, policemen; we all cooper- coerce the child Into "being good" and going to school and are willliu. ate in building civilization that will provide human necessities. True, to foot the bill to have the child become a college graduate, whethe policemen and fireman protect property, but are we to say that our the child really wants to go to college or not. That Is, the more costl>| priorities are so narrowly and selfishly conceived that our education, education becomes, at best, poor players are forced out and rich the quality of our individual lives, are less important than the owner- players are allowed in. At worst poor STUDENTS are forced out ship of things? True, policemen and firemen save lives, but are we to and rich players are allowed In. say that the consequences of education (In medicine alone, for In- There are many basic arguments to confront, most of which have stance) do not save and preserve more lives than all the policemen been advanced at Finance Committee hearings. There Is no space here r» and firemen put together? if one conceives of the social use of our to meet all fronts. But. as a citizen and parent I oppose the narrow- public institutions and the quality of the society he lives in, then in ness of social vision and selfishness of social priority that wishes the broadest sense all citizens are users of the public institutions. to turn students into a revenue source (for the General Fund!). As a All benefit from higher education. teacher I oppose the closing out of financially poor students, many of H income differentials are to be the standard for tuitions, then whom have been the best I've had in class. And there is no compro- consider this: high school graduates make more money than those who mise in this issue, just as there is no little bit" of pregnancy. D do not graduate from high school: are we then to say that our public the principle of tuition is admitted, sooner or later this baby will come high schools should impose a tuition fee? And an eighth grade educa- full term and it won't be long before students will be asked to deliver tion wUl open jobs that would be closed to an illiterate who cannot add in a big way. No one should be under any illusions about that. viaij LIUIIUI Contemporary Economic Issues Contemporary Economic Issues Contemporary Economic Issues Contemporary Economic Issues ecsc prof takes survey poll shows most legislators anti-tuition college education, he will be icism as to how the proposed students are those attending our unable to effectively utilize it funds would be spent. "An In- private Institutions of higher By FRANK J. CONNELLY for his benefit and society's be- crease In tuition will be simply learning. The Connecticut Con- ECSC Federation of Teachers nefit." a tax on education, any increase ference of Independent Colleges He said that Co v. Mesk ill's will go not to education but to a has requested that each student Returns from an Eastern proposal would be more effective general fund which may be used attending a private school be Connecticut State College (ECSC) in helping needy students than the to purchase anything, Including granted a flat sum of $1,000. poll show that the majority of present system. Lowell also fa- political patronage which as trip- state legislators oppose the pro- vors a substantial stipend for led in Connecticut in the past posed tuition for the state col- medical students, but not for the five years." A raise in tuition at the State leges, according to Frank J.Con- "general college student" who, he He also claimed that state Colleges, and the granting of pu- nelly, President of the Eastern feels, does not have anywhere college graduates generally re- blic funds to private institutions 1 Connecticut Federation of Tea- near as demanding a schedule. main in Connecticut after grad- of higher learning would violate chers and assistant professor of Criticizing the letter, Con- uation, and "enrich the culture, the philosophies underlying the philosophy at ECSC. Only 60 nelly said that Lowell had over- civilization and economy of our existence of State Colleges and of of the 213 members of the Gen- looked that "whether there be a state." He said that the pre- private colleges and universities. eral Assembly responded to the crippling sales tax, or a grad- sent low cost of education is res- poll, however. uated Income tax with all of Its ponsible for enabling a good The needy students of the Connelly wrote to each mem- loopholes for the wealthy to ex- cross-section of students to at- State of Connecticut are already ber of the state legislature ask- ploit, the low and moderate In- tend. acquiring an education at the In ghelr position regarding a come families and students will Connelly was critical of legis- State Colleges. Over 90% of the tuition at the state colleges and be paying the overwhelming bulk lators who look first to education students attending State Colleges UConn. Among those indicating of the state revenues, and that system to cut costs in times of and the University of Connecticut a "strong opposition to any hike" means they will be paying for fiscal need. "If It's a question are working at least part-time to are Rep. John Blake of Wllli- of money or education we sac- help pay their way. The needy mantlc, Sen. Robert Houley of "The raise in tuition rifice our sons and daughters students are already being help- Vernon, Rep. Tom Sweeney of . would violate the first," he remarked. ed at the State Colleges. They Norwich, Rep. Audrey Beck of The following is the text of will be the first to be turned Mansfield, and Rep.