Report on the Basin of Moose River and Adjacent Country Belonging To
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
" What Indians Are We Talking About?": a Discourse Analysis Of
"What indians Are We Talking About?": A Discourse Analysis of Intercultural Dialogues in an Ojibway Setting Jordan Davidson A Thesis in The Department of Sociology and Anthropology Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (Social and Cultural Anthropology) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada June 2008 © Jordan Davidson, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-42480-3 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-42480-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. -
TOXIC WATER: the KASHECHEWAN STORY Introduction It Was the Straw That Broke the Prover- Had Been Under a Boil-Water Alert on and Focus Bial Camel’S Back
TOXIC WATER: THE KASHECHEWAN STORY Introduction It was the straw that broke the prover- had been under a boil-water alert on and Focus bial camel’s back. A fax arrived from off for years. In fall 2005, Canadi- Health Canada (www.hc-sc.gc.ca) at the A week after the water tested positive ans were stunned to hear of the Kashechewan First Nations council for E. coli, Indian Affairs Minister appalling living office, revealing that E. coli had been Andy Scott arrived in Kashechewan. He conditions on the detected in the reserve’s drinking water. offered to provide the people with more Kashechewan First Enough was enough. A community bottled water but little else. Incensed by Nations Reserve in already plagued by poverty and unem- Scott’s apparent indifference, the Northern Ontario. ployment was now being poisoned by community redoubled their efforts, Initial reports documented the its own water supply. Something putting pressure on the provincial and presence of E. coli needed to be done, and some members federal governments to evacuate those in the reserve’s of the reserve had a plan. First they who were suffering from the effects of drinking water. closed down the schools. Next, they the contaminated water. The Ontario This was followed called a meeting of concerned members government pointed the finger at Ot- by news of poverty and despair, a of the community. Then they launched tawa because the federal government is reflection of a a media campaign that shifted the responsible for Canada’s First Nations. standard of living national spotlight onto the horrendous Ottawa pointed the finger back at the that many thought conditions in this remote, Northern province, saying that water safety and unimaginable in Ontario reserve. -
Reducing Life Safety Risks to the Kashechewan First Nation Community Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards
Reducing Life Safety Risks to the Kashechewan First Nation Community Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards • • • • • • Figure 1: Dam Safety Risk Assessment Tool Figure 2: Flood Forecast Tool De : Lamirande-Gauvin, Gabrielle A : Ducharme, Sophie Objet : FW: Canadian Consulting Engineer Awards - your entry Date : Friday, April 20, 2018 2:25:39 PM FYI Gabrielle Lamirande-Gauvin Global Marketing Manager, Energy Marketing Lead, Eastern North America From: Canadian Consulting Engineer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: April 20, 2018 2:24 PM To: Lamirande-Gauvin, Gabrielle <[email protected]> Subject: Canadian Consulting Engineer Awards - your entry DO NOT REPLY Project Information Project Name Reducing Life Safety Risks to the Kashechewan First Nation Community Location of Project Not applicable Kashechewan First Nation, Ontario Canada Map It Completed by 2017 To be entered in Category C. Water Resources Entering Firms Firm Name(s) Hatch/FHR Inc. Firm Address 2800 Speakman Drive Mississauga, Ontario L5K 2R7 Canada Map It Role in the Project Research and Studies to quantify the flooding risks associated with an ageing dam to a remote First Nations Community and develop solutions to reduce these risks. Member of the Association of Consulting Engineering Companies of Canada (ACEC)? Yes Contact #1 (Communications/Marketing/Public Relations) Gabrielle Lamirande-Gauvin Phone for Contact #1 (514) 864-5500 Email for Contact #1 [email protected] Contact #2 (Management/Administration) Gabrielle Lamirande-Gauvin Phone for Contact #2 (514) 864-5500 Email for Contact #2 [email protected] Contact #3 (Project Engineer) C. Richard Donnelly Phone for Contact #3 (905) 357-6970 Email for Contact #3 [email protected] P.Eng? Yes Project Outline Project Summary The Kashechewan Ring Dyke protects over 2000 residents of a remote community from flooding that occurs during spring break up. -
Community Development in Rainy River First Nations: a Study of Self
Community Development in Rainy River First Nations: A Study of Self- Sufficiency and Land-Culture by Gordon Lyle Blackburde A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Native Studies University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2013 by Gordon Lyle Blackburde Abstract Due to government intervention the inhabitants of Rainy River First Nations were deprived of the material resources available to many Canadians. In 1914, the federal government established a community reserve that consisted of peoples from eight separate and distinct communities, which directly contravened Treaty Three. The paper (through interviews, observation and textual analysis) provides a critical overview of the community's land claims settlement and reclamation process, and struggle for sustainability in the twenty-first century. In addition, it examines the manner that land- culture, human resources and capital resources may be applied to revitalize the community through community development and economic strategies. Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the Centre for Creative Writing and Oral Culture for their generous award, the Manitoba Research Alliance grant I received for my work, and the Faculty of Arts, J.G. Fletcher Award, which assisted my field research. Gichi miigwech to my committee, peter kulchyski, Wanda Wuttunee and John Loxley. Dedication This paper is dedicated to knowledge seekers, diviners of faith and the ever -
N Shore L. Superior: Geology, Scenery
THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”). -
Petition to List US Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens)
Petition to List U.S. Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act May 14, 2018 NOTICE OF PETITION Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on May 14, 2018: Gary Frazer, USFWS Assistant Director, [email protected] Charles Traxler, Assistant Regional Director, Region 3, [email protected] Georgia Parham, Endangered Species, Region 3, [email protected] Mike Oetker, Deputy Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Allan Brown, Assistant Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Wendi Weber, Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Deborah Rocque, Deputy Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Petitioner Center for Biological Diversity formally requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the United States as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. Alternatively, the Center requests that the USFWS define and list distinct population segments of lake sturgeon in the U.S. as threatened or endangered. Lake sturgeon populations in Minnesota, Lake Superior, Missouri River, Ohio River, Arkansas-White River and lower Mississippi River may warrant endangered status. Lake sturgeon populations in Lake Michigan and the upper Mississippi River basin may warrant threatened status. Lake sturgeon in the central and eastern Great Lakes (Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River basin) seem to be part of a larger population that is more widespread. -
Climate Change Adaptation Plan 2019
Climate Change Adaptation Plan 2019 Prepared for the Indigenous Climate Change Gathering 2019 – Ottawa ON March 18-19, 2019 Moose Cree First Nation Overview Moose Factory Climate Change Adaptation Plan 2017-19 Gathering: Process Preparations: Future Q&A Contact info Moose Cree First Nation Moose Factory Est. 1673 Moose Cree First Nation Climate Change Adaptation Plan 2017-2019 Process: We are here Moose Cree First Nation #1 - Initiate • Adaptation Champion and Team. • Band Council support. • Identify stakeholders. Linked Adaptation Plan existing Plans: Moose Factory: • Strategic Plan (2015) • Community Profile (2015) • Organizational Review (2010) Moose Cree First Nation • Values and climate change Impacts • Traditional and Local Knowledge • Regional climate trends and impacts Moose Cree First Nation Understanding Climate Change Impacts Traditional And Local Knowledge Scientific Moose Cree First Nation Gathering the information We took the consultation process to the people One on one interviews with Elders Went to Youth Centre with Pizza Survey Moose Cree First Nation Identified Community Priorities and Impacts become the focus of the Plan Moose Cree First Nation Climate Change - Impacts Traditional Way of Life • Changes in cultural, hunting, trapping, & camping; loss of traditional ways & knowledge. Economy • Changes in hunting & trapping means changes to the subsistence economy. Public Health & Safety • Increased danger when crossing the Moose River. Moose Cree First Nation Climate Change - Impacts Vegetation • Muskeg areas drying & different plant/tree species arriving. Birds • Changes in patterns; New species observed (i.e. Canada geese) & others no longer (i.e. snow geese). Wildlife • Decline in the moose population and small wildlife (i.e. beavers); Increase in new species (i.e. -
Missinaibi River Route
- p. I Me " ,* at. U F. I :: I, I’ uJu -a--- A TRIP TO MOOSE FACTORY. ft - A BACKGROUND INFORMATION UNIT ON THE FUR TRADE OF NORTH EASTERN ONTARIO. 1 I. D. E. PUGH. - -- inabie River Page 18 Northern Times Wednesday,-Septembcr 1, 1971 tilE -e to canoeists OF ASERIES BY D1LfP - the low-lying The Migginabie River pnivenitfi’’ reaches north. marsh and muskeg belt of the udied the Dnlnage j0ttreat in canoe Hudson Bay Lowlands. Flora and fauna this region Is still unorganized. BY thai he is writing a D.E. PUGH strawberries and blueberries of. his education- Lakes are myriad but are only few feet deep. Tributaries spread 0,2. PdW is a unfveni& stud fer delightful wilderness treats River, draining like ant who has shad/ed the amidst the lush growihof Ili:iie;is Is the prin- from the Missinaibi River north. cracks In shattered glass;but the with particular interest ha canoe ferns and wild grasses. The Ca- tjihultary of the muskeg. The routes, fore thesis he is writing noet±t will delight, too,lntbeco To-day it Is the creeks drain nearby river Itself Is wide and shallow, In furthering his education. lourful bright flowers of rnnryh the Moose River martgold, blue iris, -and jose tdsms eaxide- often flowing merely a few Ira- Blotic growth along the Missi- pa- ches deep over wide gravel beds nalbl River reflects the fertile honey suckle and asters. toe pulp and checkerboard-like Amidst this atuzc;-;rt vc-ta The River Is no- which sprout a aiy alluvial banks which are formation of numerous glacier well drained and sheltered. -
North Lake Superior Métis
The Historical Roots of Métis Communities North of Lake Superior Gwynneth C. D. Jones Vancouver, B. C. 31 March 2015. Prepared for the Métis Nation of Ontario Table of Contents Introduction 3 Section I: The Early Fur Trade and Populations to 1821 The Fur Trade on Lakes Superior and Nipigon, 1600 – 1763 8 Post-Conquest Organization of the Fur Trade, 1761 – 1784 14 Nipigon, Michipicoten, Grand Portage, and Mixed-Ancestry Fur Trade Employees, 1789 - 1804 21 Grand Portage, Kaministiquia, and North West Company families, 1799 – 1805 29 Posts and Settlements, 1807 – 1817 33 Long Lake, 1815 – 1818 40 Michipicoten, 1817 – 1821 44 Fort William/Point Meuron, 1817 – 1821 49 The HBC, NWC and Mixed-Ancestry Populations to 1821 57 Fur Trade Culture to 1821 60 Section II: From the Merger to the Treaty: 1821 - 1850 After the Merger: Restructuring the Fur Trade and Associated Populations, 1821 - 1826 67 Fort William, 1823 - 1836 73 Nipigon, Pic, Long Lake and Michipicoten, 1823 - 1836 79 Families in the Lake Superior District, 1825 - 1835 81 Fur Trade People and Work, 1825 - 1841 85 "Half-breed Indians", 1823 - 1849 92 Fur Trade Culture, 1821 - 1850 95 Section III: The Robinson Treaties, 1850 Preparations for Treaty, 1845 - 1850 111 The Robinson Treaty and the Métis, 1850 - 1856 117 Fur Trade Culture on Lake Superior in the 1850s 128 After the Treaty, 1856 - 1859 138 2 Section IV: Persistence of Fur Trade Families on Lakes Superior and Nipigon, 1855 - 1901 Infrastructure Changes in the Lake Superior District, 1863 - 1921 158 Investigations into Robinson-Superior Treaty paylists, 1879 - 1899 160 The Dominion Census of 1901 169 Section V: The Twentieth Century Lake Nipigon Fisheries, 1884 - 1973 172 Métis Organizations in Lake Nipigon and Lake Superior, 1971 - 1973 180 Appendix: Maps and Illustrations Watercolour, “Miss Le Ronde, Hudson Bay Post, Lake Nipigon”, 1867?/1901 Map of Lake Nipigon in T. -
The State of Lake Superior in 2005
THE STATE OF LAKE SUPERIOR IN 2005 SPECIAL PUBLICATION 10-01 The Great Lakes Fishery Commission was established by the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States, which was ratified on October 11, 1955. It was organized in April 1956 and assumed its duties as set forth in the Convention on July 1, 1956. The Commission has two major responsibilities: first, develop coordinated programs of research in the Great Lakes, and, on the basis of the findings, recommend measures which will permit the maximum sustained productivity of stocks of fish of common concern; second, formulate and implement a program to eradicate or minimize sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes. The Commission is also required to publish or authorize the publication of scientific or other information obtained in the performance of its duties. In fulfillment of this requirement the Commission publishes the Technical Report Series, intended for peer-reviewed scientific literature; Special Publications, designed primarily for dissemination of reports produced by working committees of the Commission; and other (non-serial) publications. Technical Reports are most suitable for either interdisciplinary review and synthesis papers of general interest to Great Lakes fisheries researchers, managers, and administrators, or more narrowly focused material with special relevance to a single but important aspect of the Commission's program. Special Publications, being working documents, may evolve with the findings of and charges to a particular committee. Both publications follow the style of the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Sponsorship of Technical Reports or Special Publications does not necessarily imply that the findings or conclusions contained therein are endorsed by the Commission. -
Draft Environmental Report Ivanhoe River
Draft Environmental Report Ivanhoe River - The Chute and Third Falls Hydroelectric Generating Station Projects Revised May 2013 The Chute and Third Falls Draft Environmental Report May 2013 Insert “Foreword” i The Chute and Third Falls Draft Environmental Report May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Waterpower in Ontario ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Introduction to Project .................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Zone of Influence .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Overview of the Environmental Screening Process ........................................................ 4 1.4 Approach to the Environmental Screening Process ........................................................ 5 1.4.1 Legal Framework ................................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Characterize Local Environment of Proposed Development ................................... 7 1.4.3 Identify Potential Environmental Effects ................................................................. 8 1.4.4 Identify Required Mitigation, Monitoring or Additional Investigations ................... 8 1.4.5 Agency and Public Consultation and Aboriginal Communities Engagement ............ 8 2. -
Appendix F Environmental Features
Appendix F Environmental Features YELLOW FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT APPENDIX F Note Prior to the release of the Draft EA, the Project was referred to as the Island Falls Hydroelectric Project. Following release of a draft environmental assessment report for review by First Nations, agencies, and members of the public, numerous comments were received. As a direct result of agency and public consultation, YFP made a decision to relocate the Project two kilometres upstream of Island Falls to Yellow Falls. Accordingly, the Project name has changed to the “Yellow Falls Hydroelectric Project” and the Project nameplate capacity has changed from 20 MW to 16 MW. The following Environmental Features report details existing natural and socioeconomic conditions and was prepared for the Island Falls location. Project relocation has not appreciably altered descriptions of existing natural and socioeconomic conditions. The Yellow Falls Project location has been provided on figures to indicate how the revised location corresponds with existing natural and socioeconomic environmental features. Appendix F1 Environmental Features Report ISLAND FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT APPENDIX F1 – ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES File No. 160960168 Prepared for: Yellow Falls Power Limited Partnership c/o 500, 1324 – 17th Avenue SW Calgary, AB T2T 5S8 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 70 Southgate Drive, Suite 1 Guelph ON N1G 4P5 February 2009 ISLAND FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT APPENDIX F1 – ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1