Finacial Sector Development in the Pacific
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Market Structure and Liquidity on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Industrial Organization and Regulation of the Securities Industry Volume Author/Editor: Andrew W. Lo, editor Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-48847-0 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/lo__96-1 Conference Date: January 19-22, 1994 Publication Date: January 1996 Chapter Title: Market Structure and Liquidity on the Tokyo Stock Exchange Chapter Author: Bruce N. Lehmann, David M. Modest Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8108 Chapter pages in book: (p. 275 - 316) 9 Market Structure and Liquidity on the Tokyo Stock Exchange Bruce N. Lehmann and David M. Modest Common sense and conventional economic reasoning suggest that liquid sec- ondary markets facilitate lower-cost capital formation than would otherwise occur. Broad common sense does not, however, provide a reliable guide to the specific market mechanisms-the nitty-gritty details of market microstruc- ture-that would produce the most desirable economic outcomes. The demand for and supply of liquidity devolves from the willingness, in- deed the demand, of public investors to trade. However, their demands are seldom coordinated except by particular trading mechanisms, causing transient fluctuations in the demand for liquidity services and resulting in the fragmenta- tion of order flow over time. In most organized secondary markets, designated market makers like dealers and specialists serve as intermediaries between buyers and sellers who provide liquidity over short time intervals as part of their provision of intermediation services. Liquidity may ultimately be pro- vided by the willingness of investors to trade with one another, but designated market makers typically bridge temporal gaps in investor demands in most markets.' Bruce N. -
Global IPO Trends Report Is Released Every Quarter and Looks at the IPO Markets, Trends and Outlook for the Americas, Asia-Pacific and EMEIA Regions
When will the economy catch up with the capital markets? Global IPO trends: Q3 2020 ey.com/ipo/trends #IPOreport Contents Global IPO market 3 Americas 10 Asia-Pacific 15 Europe, Middle East, India and Africa 23 Appendix 29 About this report EY Global IPO trends report is released every quarter and looks at the IPO markets, trends and outlook for the Americas, Asia-Pacific and EMEIA regions. The current report provides insights, facts and figures on the IPO market for the first nine months of 2020* and analyzes the implications for companies planning to go public in the short and medium term. You will find this report at the EY Global IPO website, and you can subscribe to receive it every quarter. You can also follow the report on social media: via Twitter and LinkedIn using #IPOreport *The first nine months of 2020 cover completed IPOs from 1 January 2020 to 30 September 2020. All values are US$ unless otherwise noted. Subscribe to EY Quarterly IPO trends reports Get the latest IPO analysis direct to your inbox. GlobalGlobal IPO IPO trends: trends: Q3Q3 20202020 || Page 2 Global IPO market Liquidity fuels IPOs amidst global GDP contraction “Although the market sentiments can be fragile, the scene is set for a busy last quarter to end a turbulent 2020 that has seen some stellar IPO performance. The US presidential election, as well as the China-US relationship post-election, will be key considerations in future cross-border IPO activities among the world’s leading stock exchanges. Despite the uncertainties, companies and sectors that have adapted and excelled in the ‘new normal’ should continue to attract IPO investors. -
Published on July 21, 2021 1. Changes in Constituents 2
Results of the Periodic Review and Component Stocks of Tokyo Stock Exchange Dividend Focus 100 Index (Effective July 30, 2021) Published on July 21, 2021 1. Changes in Constituents Addition(18) Deletion(18) CodeName Code Name 1414SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. 1801 TAISEI CORPORATION 2154BeNext-Yumeshin Group Co. 1802 OBAYASHI CORPORATION 3191JOYFUL HONDA CO.,LTD. 1812 KAJIMA CORPORATION 4452Kao Corporation 2502 Asahi Group Holdings,Ltd. 5401NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION 4004 Showa Denko K.K. 5713Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Ltd. 4183 Mitsui Chemicals,Inc. 5802Sumitomo Electric Industries,Ltd. 4204 Sekisui Chemical Co.,Ltd. 5851RYOBI LIMITED 4324 DENTSU GROUP INC. 6028TechnoPro Holdings,Inc. 4768 OTSUKA CORPORATION 6502TOSHIBA CORPORATION 4927 POLA ORBIS HOLDINGS INC. 6503Mitsubishi Electric Corporation 5105 Toyo Tire Corporation 6988NITTO DENKO CORPORATION 5301 TOKAI CARBON CO.,LTD. 7011Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,Ltd. 6269 MODEC,INC. 7202ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED 6448 BROTHER INDUSTRIES,LTD. 7267HONDA MOTOR CO.,LTD. 6501 Hitachi,Ltd. 7956PIGEON CORPORATION 7270 SUBARU CORPORATION 9062NIPPON EXPRESS CO.,LTD. 8015 TOYOTA TSUSHO CORPORATION 9101Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 8473 SBI Holdings,Inc. 2.Dividend yield (estimated) 3.50% 3. Constituent Issues (sort by local code) No. local code name 1 1414 SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. 2 1605 INPEX CORPORATION 3 1878 DAITO TRUST CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD. 4 1911 Sumitomo Forestry Co.,Ltd. 5 1925 DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. 6 1954 Nippon Koei Co.,Ltd. 7 2154 BeNext-Yumeshin Group Co. 8 2503 Kirin Holdings Company,Limited 9 2579 Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc. 10 2914 JAPAN TOBACCO INC. 11 3003 Hulic Co.,Ltd. 12 3105 Nisshinbo Holdings Inc. 13 3191 JOYFUL HONDA CO.,LTD. -
Feb. 22, 2021 Listing Department Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc. Outline
(Reference Translation) Feb. 22, 2021 Listing Department Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc. Outline of Initial Listing Issue Company Name G-NEXT Inc. Scheduled Listing Date Mar. 25 2021 Market Section Mothers Current Listed Market N/A Name and Title of YOKOJI Yusuke, Representative Director Representative Address of Main Office 4-7-1 Iidabashi, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo, 102-0072 Tel. +81-3-5962-5170 (Closest Point of Contact) (Same as above) Home Page https://www.gnext.co.jp/ Date of Incorporation Jul. 12, 2001 Description of Business Developing and providing "Discoveriez", a customer relationship software Category of Industry / Information & Communication / 4179 (ISIN JP3386760007) Code Authorized Total No. of 10,750,000 shares Shares to be Issued No. of Issued Shares 3,732,200 shares (As of Feb. 22, 2021) No. of Issued Shares 4,082,200 shares (incl. treasury shares) (Note 1) The number includes newly issued shares issued through the at the Time of Listing public offering. (Note 2) The number could increase as a result of the exercise of the share options. Capital JPY 396,137 thousand (As of Feb. 22, 2021) No. of Shares per Share 100 shares Unit Business Year From Apr. 1 to Mar. 31 of the following year General Shareholders In June Meeting Record Date Mar. 31 Record Date of Surplus Sep. 30 and Mar. 31 Dividend Transfer Agent Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, Limited Auditor TOHO Audit Corporation Managing Trading SMBC Nikko Securities Inc. Participant -1- © 2021 Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc. All rights reserved. DISCLAIMER: This translation may be used only for reference purposes. This English version is not an official translation of the original Japanese document. -
Price and Volume in the Tokyo Stock Exchange : an Exploratory Study
rcsffinz , i. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN BOOKSTACKS ]^ *- Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/pricevolumeintok1573tsey BEBR FACULTY WORKING PAPER NO. 89-157:5 • '-/w Trice and \ olume in the rokyo Stock Exchange: An Exploratory Study The Library of the AUG 1 1989 University cl Hiinofc of Urbana-Champalgn V. K. Tse . BEBR FACULTY WORKING PAPER NO. 89-1573 College of Commerce and Business Administration University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign May 1989 Price and Volume in the Tokyo Stock Exchange An Exploratory Study Y. K. Tse, Visiting Scholar Department of Economics This paper was written when I was visiting the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. I thank Josef Lakonishok for stimulation and inspiration Abstract: In this paper, we consider the unconditional distributions of market return and trading volume in the Tokyo Stock Exchange. We also examine the relationship between price changes and trading volumes. The problems considered are directed by findings in the U.S. market, with a view to ascertain similarities and differences. Daily market returns exhibit intra-week periodicity. Returns over daily, weekly and monthly intervals are negativelv skewed and leptokurtLc. While daily returns are slightly positively autocorre- lated, the autocorrelations for weekly and monthly returns are statistically insignificant. There is evidence against the stable Paretian hypothesis for market returns; and the empirical results are in support of market returns following a low order mixture of normal distribution. Trading volume is highly positively autocorrelated. This suggests that trading volume is not a good proxy for information. -
B3 Transfers Equities to Its Multi-Asset Clearing Platform
Press release 29 August 2017 B3 transfers equities to its multi-asset clearing platform Cinnober’s real-time clearing solution now handles post trading process for both the equities and the derivatives markets in Brazil • BRL 21 billion of collateral returned to the market (approx. USD 6,4 billion) • Phase two completed of major Post-Trade Integration Project going from two clearinghouses to one for equities and derivatives • More efficient risk management by analyzing the risk on entire portfolios B3 (the Brazilian exchange and clearinghouse) successfully launched on Monday the equities, corporate bonds, and equities lending markets on its new multi-asset clearing platform. The clearing solution is delivered by Cinnober, built on its TRADExpress RealTime Clearing system. The migration of the equities clearinghouse was the target for phase two of B3’s Post-Trade Integration Project that will consolidate B3’s originally four clearinghouses into one integrated entity (managing equities, derivatives, government and corporate debt securities and FX). Derivatives and OTC products were the first to launch on the new platform in phase one. With the new integrated clearinghouse, B3 manages risk more efficiently. By analyzing the risk on entire portfolios, the clearinghouse can compensate if an investor has opposite positions in the same underlying asset across product groups and markets. When financial and commodity derivatives, along with OTC products, migrated to the new clearinghouse in phase one, the total systemic benefit in terms of margin release amounted to around BRL 20 billion. The estimated effect from Monday’s launch of phase two is BRL 21 billion of collateral that was returned to the market with complete preservation of the clearinghouse’s safety system. -
Securities Market Structure and Regulation
INTRODUCTION In beginning this symposium on the structure and regulation of the securities markets, I’m sure we will all keep in mind George Santayana’s caution that: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”1 Although enormous changes have taken place over the past few decades, we keep hearing echoes of the past. When the London Stock Exchange (LSE) switched from floor-based to electronic trading exactly twenty years ago, it decided that the transformation might be too traumatic for its members, so it adopted a hybrid market—an electronic market combined with traditional floor trading. The hybrid market lasted just over four months, at which time the LSE closed its floor for trading in equities. Will the New York Stock Exchange’s experience with its new hybrid market be the same or different? The Consolidated Limited Order Book (CLOB), which I expect will be discussed today, was first proposed to the SEC thirty years ago by Professor Peake, one of today’s speakers, in 1976, a year after Congress told the SEC to create a national market system. The CLOB, which would execute investors’ orders electronically under a rule of time and price priority, seemed to him the best way to assure best execution of investors’ orders throughout the national market system. In 1978, the SEC told the exchanges to create a CLOB. A year later the Commission had second thoughts: it feared that a CLOB would lead to the elimination of exchange trading floors by inexorably forcing all trading into a fully automated trading system. -
Your Exchange of Choice Overview of JPX Who We Are
Your Exchange of Choice Overview of JPX Who we are... Japan Exchange Group, Inc. (JPX) was formed through the merger between Tokyo Stock Exchange Group and Osaka Securities Exchange in January 2013. In 1878, soon after the Meiji Restoration, Eiichi Shibusawa, who is known as the father of capitalism in Japan, established Tokyo Stock Exchange. That same year, Tomoatsu Godai, a businessman who was instrumental in the economic development of Osaka, established Osaka Stock Exchange. This year marks the 140th anniversary of their founding. JPX has inherited the will of both Eiichi Shibusawa and Tomoatsu Godai as the pioneers of capitalism in modern Japan and is determined to contribute to drive sustainable growth of the Japanese economy. Contents Strategies for Overview of JPX Creating Value 2 Corporate Philosophy and Creed 14 Message from the CEO 3 The Role of Exchange Markets 18 Financial Policies 4 Business Model 19 IT Master Plan 6 Creating Value at JPX 20 Core Initiatives 8 JPX History 20 Satisfying Diverse Investor Needs and Encouraging Medium- to Long-Term Asset 10 Five Years since the Birth of JPX - Building Milestone Developments 21 Supporting Listed Companies in Enhancing Corporate Value 12 FY2017 Highlights 22 Fulfilling Social Mission by Reinforcing Market Infrastructure 23 Creating New Fields of Exchange Business Editorial Policy Contributing to realizing an affluent society by promoting sustainable development of the market lies at the heart of JPX's corporate philosophy. We believe that our efforts to realize this corporate philosophy will enable us to both create sustainable value and fulfill our corporate social responsibility. Our goal in publishing this JPX Report 2018 is to provide readers with a deeper understanding of this idea and our initiatives in business activities. -
An Institutional Comparison Between European and Japanese Junior Stock Markets
INNOVATION-FUELLED, SUSTAINABLE, INCLUSIVE GROWTH Working Paper How do financial markets adapt? An institutional comparison between European and Japanese Junior stock markets Caroline Granier Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies Valérie Revest Université Lyon 2, Triangle, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies Alessandro Sapio Parthenope University of Naples, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies 11/2017 May This project has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation action under grant agreement No 649186 How do financial markets adapt? An institutional comparison between European and Japanese Junior stock markets Caroline Granier (Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa) Valérie Revest (Université Lyon 2, Triangle & Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa) Alessandro Sapio (Parthenope University of Naples & Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa) ABSTRACT Since the last decade, new Junior stock markets or second-tier stock markets have emerged in various countries, often influenced by the Alternative Investment Market, created by the London Stock Echange in 1995, and considered by numerous economic and political actors as a reference. Junior Markets are characterised by simplified listing processes and customised information standards. The creation of junior stock market segments can be seen as an instance of financialisation and of the spread of market-led financial architectures to economies traditionally characterised by credit-based financial systems, according to the evolutionary taxonomy outlined by Dosi (1990). This begs the question as to whether we are witnessing an increasing convergence towards financial systems that are typical of the Anglo-Saxon world. With these questions in mind, in this paper we perform an institutional comparison of junior stocks markets located in countries characterised by different varieties of capitalism : AIM London, AIM Italy, Alternext, Entry Standard, OMX First North, Mothers, Tokyo AIM, JASDAQ. -
The S&P/B3 Ingenius Index: Bringing Global Innovation to the Brazilian
Index Education The S&P/B3 Ingenius Index: Bringing Global Innovation to the Brazilian Market Contributor INTRODUCTION Silvia Kitchener Over the past five years, the world witnessed the dramatic rise in the Director, Global Equity Indices market capitalization of technology-driven companies like Facebook, Latin America [email protected] Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google (now Alphabet), collectively known as the FAANG stocks. The growth rates of these stocks over the past five years have been quite remarkable, with the average price change exceeding 250% and outperforming the S&P 500® by 15.5% (see Exhibit 1). On May 11, 2020, S&P Dow Jones Indices (S&P DJI) and B3 introduced the S&P/B3 Ingenius Index to the Brazilian market. The index seeks to measure the performance of global companies creating many of the innovative products and services that permeate today’s modern world and are transforming almost every aspect of daily life, including the way we communicate, work, entertain, and shop, and nearly everything in between. By launching the S&P/B3 Ingenius Index, S&P DJI is providing an index that is designed to measure the performance of 15 innovative global companies trading on B3 as Brazilian Depositary Receipts (BDRs), giving local investors access to foreign securities. Exhibit 1: Five-Year Average Price Change FAANG Stocks S&P 500 Facebook, Inc. Cl A Alphabet Inc. Cl A Amazon.com, Inc. Netflix, Inc. Apple Inc. 0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% Five-Year Average Price Change Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. Data as of July 30, 2021. -
(TOPIX High Dividend Yield 40 Index) December 25, 2020 Tokyo Stock
Tokyo Stock Exchange Index Guidebook (TOPIX High Dividend Yield 40 Index) December 25, 2020 Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc. Published December 25, 2020 DISCLAIMER: This translation may be used for reference purposes only. This English version is not an official translation of the original Japanese document. In cases where any differences occur between the English version and the original Japanese version, the Japanese version shall prevail. This translation is subject to change without notice. Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc., Japan Exchange Group, Inc., Osaka Securities Exchange Co., Ltd., Tokyo Stock Exchange Regulation and/or their affiliates shall individually or jointly accept no responsibility or liability for damage or loss caused by any error, inaccuracy, misunderstanding, or changes with regard to this translation. 1 Copyright © 2017- by Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc. All rights reserved Contents Record of Changes................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 4 Ⅰ. Outline of the Index.................................................................................................... 4 Ⅱ. Index Calculation........................................................................................................ 5 1. Outline....................................................................................................................... 5 -
How Fast Do Tokyo and New York Stock Exchanges Respond to Each Other?: an Analysis with High-Frequency Data
Discussion Paper No.10 How Fast Do Tokyo and New York Stock Exchanges Respond to Each Other?: An Analysis with High-Frequency Data Yoshiro Tsutsui and Kenjiro Hirayama October 2008 GCOE Secretariat Graduate School of Economics OSAKA UNIVERSITY 1-7 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-0043, Japan How Fast Do Tokyo and New York Stock Exchanges Respond * to Each Other?: An Analysis with High-Frequency Data Yoshiro Tsutsui Osaka University Kenjiro Hirayama Kwansei Gakuin University Abstract This paper uses one-minute returns on the TOPIX and S&P500 to examine the efficiency of the Tokyo and New York Stock Exchanges. Our major finding is that Tokyo completes reactions to New York within six minutes, but New York reacts within fourteen minutes. Dividing the sample period into three subperiods, we found that the response time has shortened and the magnitude of reaction has become larger over the period in both markets. The magnitude of response in New York to a fall in Tokyo is roughly double that of a rise. JEL Classification Numbers: G14, G15, F36 Keywords: international linkage, stock prices, market efficiency, high frequency data Correspondence: Yoshiro Tsutsui Kenjiro Hirayama Graduate School of Economics School of Economics Osaka University Kwansei Gakuin University 1-7 Machikane-yama, Toyonaka Uegahara, Nishinomiya-shi 560-0043 Japan 662-8051 Japan Phone: +81-6-6850-5223 Phone: +81-798-54-6438 Fax: +81-6-6850-5274 Fax: +81-798-54-6438 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] * We are especially grateful to the anonymous referee of this journal for many constructive comments which led to substantial improvements.